2010-01
TAREA 3
1) FoG. Using the data in Table 1.1 calculate the gravitational acceleration on the
surface of the Moon as a percentage of that on the surface of the Earth
GE
R2
aE =
aM =
Gm
RL 2
Ratio
2
aM Gm RL 2 m R
=
=
aE
GE R 2 E RL
Inserting values from Table 1.1 for the mass E (5.974 x 1024 kg) and radius R (6371
km) of the Earth and the mass m (0.0735 x 1024 kg, or 0.0123 E) and radius RL (1738
km) of the Moon gives
6371 2
aM
= 0.0123
= 0.165
1738
aE
Gravitational acceleration on the Moon is 16.5% of that on the surface of the Earth.
The mean value of gravity on the Earth is 9.81 m s-2, on the Moon it is 1.62 m s-2.
hL =
gE
9.81
hE =
2.45 = 14.8 m
gL
1.62
(a) What must the period and orientation of the orbit be?
(b) What is the radius of the orbit?
(c) If a radio signal is sent to the satellite from a transmitter at latitude 45N,
what is the shortest time taken for its reflection to reach the Earth?
(a) A geostationary orbit is one for which the period of rotation of the satellite
about the Earth is equal to the rotation of the Earth about its own axis. This
keeps the satellite stationary above a given location. The orbit must be in the
plane of the equator.
(b) The radius of the satellites orbit is found as in the previous exercise.
Satellite rotation period, T = 1 day = 86.400 seg
Rotation speed, s = 2 = 7.2722 105 rad s-1
T
2
Centripetal acceleration at distance rs, ac = s rs
GE
Gravitational acceleration at distance rs, aG = 2
rs
GE
2
Equating the accelerations, s rs = 2
rs
2
2
R
GE R
rs3 = 2 = aG
R s
s
6 2
6.37110
3
rs = 9.81
= 7.5297 10 22
5
7.272 10
1 = 5.30244 10 3
2 = 5.8 10 6.
This expression gives the change of gravity in m s-2 with latitude, where the
latitude is in radians. To convert to kilometers of north-south displacement (s)
it is necessary to use the relationship s =(R), where R is the Earths radius.
dgN dgN gE
=
= sin2 (1 + 4 2 cos2 )
ds Rd R
dgN 978032.7
=
(5.30244 103 ) sin2(1+ 4.375 103 cos2)
ds
6371
= 0.81399sin2
The cos 2 term in the equation is much smaller than the first term. At latitude
45N, as in this exercise, sin2 = 1 and cos2 = 0, and the last term in the
equation is zero.
dgN
978033
=
Gravity (mgal)
-39.2
-49.5
-65.6
-78.1
-95.0
-104.2
The measured gravity anomaly contains (1) a variation due to the elevation above the
reference ellipsoid and the corresponding changing thickness of the Bouguer plate
beneath the traverse, and (2) a contribution from deep sources. Ignoring finer details
such as tidal and topographic corrections, the Bouguer anomaly gB is
gB = gm + ge gN
where gm is the measured gravity, given in the table, and gN is the theoretical value on
the reference ellipsoid. ge is the combined elevation correction for elevation h :
ge = (0.3086 0.0419 103 ) h
The mean rock density is unknown. Using the Nettleton method (Section 2.5.5.4)
trial values of density are inserted in the equation and added to the observed gravity
values to give an elevation-corrected gravity at each measurement station. The
optimum density is found when the corrected anomaly shows the least correlation
with the elevation profile.
The table above gives the gravity anomaly at each station corrected with the
combined elevation correction using densities of 2500, 2700 and 2900 kg m-3.
A plot of these data (below) shows that using = 2500 kg m-3 the anomaly is parallel
to the elevation profile; this indicates that the chosen density is too low. Using =
2900 kg m-3 the data are over-corrected; with increasing eleavation the corrected
anomaly becomes ever more negative. With = 2700 kg m-3 there is minimum
correlation with the elevation.
A better method is to draw a graph in which the gravity anomaly, corrected only for
the free-air effect (last column in the above table), is plotted against the station
elevation.
The points fall on a straight line whose equation may be found using linear regression.
In this case it is
g = 0.1129h - 19.73
The first term corresponds to the Bouguer correction; the second term is the
background anomaly, equal to 19.7 mgal. Thus the coefficient 0.1129 is equal to
0.0419 x 10-3. This gives the optimum density, = 2695 kg m-3 (aprox 2700 kg m-3)
as in the first method.