26 tayangan

Diunggah oleh bourbaki74

A to Evaluate the Internal Stability of Grain Structrures

- 12 Peat Soils of Sarawak
- Uncertainty Quantification by Using Stochastic
- Soil Pore System1 [UDAH]
- Explanation About Our Website
- soli8
- Pore Formation During Laser Beam Welding
- 1-s2.0-S0016236112005492-main.pdf
- CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING CT III 2012-13.docx
- IntJournalMineralResEng-v12n2-2007-CaracterizaçãoMecânicaPropriedadesEnchimento-Yilmaz et al
- AIRW 2007 Engineering Book
- Chap 2.5 Porosity of Mortars
- 08_chapter 3.pdf
- Laporan Fisika Batuan 3712100017
- Pore Structure of Air-Entrained Hardened Cement Paste
- JURNAL Cr-Karbon Aktif
- Projet d'Article Alterites de Foreke-dschang 07 10 2017' Sans Tableaux Et Figures
- Soil
- koefisien Tanah
- Gas Reservoir Performance in Abnormally High Pressure Carbonates
- Patent

Anda di halaman 1dari 9

ICSE6-112

Structures

Thomas ETZER1 , Markus AUFLEGER1 , Peter MUCKENTHALER2

A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria, +43 512 507 2912, markus.aufleger@uibk.ac.at

D-82418 Murnau, Germany, ib.dm@t-online.de

Abstract: Many of the available criteria for the assessment of internal erosion require extensive calculations

and are therefore prone to arithmetic errors. A free software tool developed at the University of Innsbruck

provides a user-friendly possibility for the application of established methods to estimate the internal stability

of grain structures. A simplified pore model based on geometrical considerations is also included. The paper

deals with the range of functions of this instrument. The on-site conditions of a conducted dyke project are

used as a case study to illustrate its practicability.

Key words: seepage, software, erosion criteria, pore model

Introduction

Common criteria for the evaluation of the internal stability in grain structures have been derived either empirically by laboratory tests or theoretically by geometrical considerations. Despite the remarkable number of

different findings, only a few rules are recommended in reference books and used in practice. In many cases

the applied criterion is not the one, which is fitted best to the problem, but the easiest to use. A reason for this

may be the fact that some procedures require more calculation effort than others.

For research on internal erosion processes, a software tool named Prolix was developed at the University of

Innsbruck to apply and compare different approaches. It was written in the widely-used programming language

MATLAB, which is marketed by MathWorks Inc. The structure has a modular concept to allow a quick adaption

of existing parts and the easy implementation of new thoughts. The basic idea was to provide a simple graphical

interface for the user which controls a couple of expandable functions. These functions are realized as so called

Script-Files and may be adapted individually. Some of them are presented and discussed below.

The usual starting point for most approaches is the particle size distribution (PSD) of the observed soil. It can

be easily received by standardized methods and is therefore a suitable base for an objective examination. To

run an analysis in Prolix, the used sieve sizes and the corresponding percentage passing by weight are required.

The data can be transferred into the software interactively for several soils at once from an Excel table with a

defined structure.

567

Basic Functions

The software stores the name of each soil and its PSD in a temporary file. Additionally, each PSD is stored in a

vector of uniform size as given in equation 1. Therefore, the corresponding grain diameters are interpolated loglinear from mass percentage 0 to 100 with spacing of 1 %. As usual, the characteristic diameter dx,i represents

the grain size, which is not exceeded by x weight percent of the particles in soil specimen number i. This step

simplifies the handling of samples which are gathered with unequal sets of sieves.

PSDi = [d0,i d1,i d2,i ... d100,i ]

(1)

It is possible, to classify the soils as a filter or base material in an additional column in the data source. This information is also written in the temporary file and allows the application of standard recommendations for filter

design. The actual version of Prolix contains the criteria of Terzaghi, the United States Bureau of Reclamation and the United States Department of Agriculture [Terzaghi & Peck, 1948], [USBR, 1987], [USDA, 1994].

Herein, these functions will not be treated further. All the results as well as the PSD of each soil can be plotted

automatically in standard graphs by the software. Export to common file formats is provided.

3

3.1

Implemented Criteria

Criterion of Burenkova

The criterion of Burenkova is based on experiments carried out on wide-graded, non-cohesive sand-gravel soils

with a maximum grain size of 100 mm [Burenkova, 1993]. The basic assumption is that transport processes

of internal erosion may only occur, if fine soil particles are able to pass through the constrictions between the

coarser grains. This approach divides the material in a supporting soil skeleton and a potentially mobile filling.

Initially, the tested soils were divided into fractions with grains of about the same size and the volume of the

coarsest size fraction was measured. Stepwise, at a time the next finer size fraction was added and the volume

of the mixture was measured again. If the volume of the mixture increased after the addition of a finer fraction,

this finer fraction was considered to belong to the soil skeleton. Otherwise it was believed to consist of particles,

which are loose and able to move though the specimen. Burenkova used two factors of uniformity to describe

the soils. Their definition is given in equation 2 and 3.

h0 = d90 /d60

h

00

= d90 /d15

(2)

(3)

0.76 log(h00 ) + 1 h0 1.86 log(h00 ) + 1

(4)

Figure 1 shows a plot of h0 against log(h00 ) and the boundaries between Suffusive Soils and Non-suffusive

Soils. The Zones I and III represent soils which are vulnerable to suffusion, and Zone IV is an area of artificial

soils. The materials which are stable against the effects of suffusion are located in Zone II.

The evaluation of this criterion is done pretty simple in the software. The program reads the characteristic grain

diameters out of the temporary file and calculates the factors of uniformity h0 and h00 . The output is done in a

graph similar to figure 1 and additionally in written text.

568

IV

d90 /d60

III

II

2

I

1

10

20 30

d90 /d15

50

100

200

3.2

The diameter of pores left between equally sized grains is in average about a fourth of their size. Kenney & Lau

stated that a particle with size d can not be washed out of a soil, if there are enough grains with a size between

d and 4 d. They carried out seepage tests on non-cohesive sand-gravel soil samples with a maximum grain size

of 100 mm [Kenney & Lau, 1985].

For the evaluation of their results, Kenney & Lau plotted the mass percentage F(d) passing a sieve with an

opening width of d against the auxiliary number H. H represents the proportion of grains that will prevent

particles of size d from moving and is calculated according to equation 5.

H = F(4 d) F(d)

(5)

Soils that were unstable in the experiment had according to Kenney & Lau at least a part of the shape curve

plotted below the borderline represented by H = 1.3 F. The percentage of possible movable grains, and

therefore the end of the limit range in the H-F diagram was defined with 30 %. In widely-graded soils with an

uniformity coefficient Cu > 3, only the smallest 20 % of the grains are suspected to be washed out. Figure 2

shows the H-F diagrams for narrow and for widely-graded soils and an example for a stable and an unstable

specimen.

1

1

unstable sample

stable sample

H = F(4d) F(d)

0.8

H = F(4d) F(d)

0.8

0.6

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.2

0

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.6

F(d)

0.8

0.2

0.4

0.6

F(d)

0.8

Figure 2: H-F diagrams for narrow (left) and for widely-graded (right) soils after Kenney & Lau

569

Based on additional tests the borderline was later lowered to H = 1.0 F. The area between the first and the

revised threshold is referred to as transition zone.

To rate a soil sample using this criterion, the Prolix Software calculates in the first step a log-linear interpolation

of the mass percentages corresponding to the 4-times multiples of all characteristic diameters. This allows

the evaluation of equation 5 to determine H. The length of the borderline is selected due to the uniformity

coefficient Cu . Then it is checked, whether or not H is smaller than 1.3 or 1.0 F in this interval. The result is

delivered in written text. Also, the H F diagram for the examined soil sample is plotted.

3.3

Wan & Fell carried out seepage tests in the laboratory and applied various existing criteria on the used soils to

compare the results [Wan & Fell, 2004]. In their investigation, they identified the already mentioned methods

of Kenney & Lau and Burenkova as most accurate. The criterion of Kenney & Lau seemed to be more conservative and identified a couple of soils as unstable, which really showed no sign of internal erosion during

the experiments. According to the authors, the method of Burenkova was more accurate in identifying unstable

soils, but also predicted some collapsing samples as reliable.

Based on their results, Wan & Fell suggested to combine these methods, as they seem to successfully supplement each other. The scheme for assessing the likelihood of internal instability is given in table 1. The software

Table 1: Scheme for the criterion of WAN & FELL

Likelihood of internal instability

KENNEY & LAU (1985, 1986)

H <F

F H < 1, 3F H 1, 3F

0

00

h 0, 76 log(h ) + 1

Likely Neutral Very

BURENKOVA

Very likely

Likely

unlikely

(1993)

h0 > 0, 76 log(h00 ) + 1

Unlikely

Very unlikely Very

Unlikely

unlikely

simply carries out the steps which are required for the methods of Kenney & Lau and Burenkova and unites the

results. The classification of the observed sample is done in form of a chart similar to table 1.

Pore model

Another approach to evaluate the internal stability of granular materials is based on the geometry of the void

constrictions. A soil can be considered as internal stable, if the voids between the coarser grains are narrow

enough to prevent the fines from moving through this interstitial volume. Therefore, a couple of authors have

tried in the past to determine the pore structure to describe the liability of a soil to processes of internal erosion.

Unfortunately, there is an infinite number of possible combinations, because the particles in a natural soil differ

widely in size and shape. Therefore, the use of spherical shaped grains is a prevalent simplification for this kind

of calculations. In a soil with the densest packing, a void is built by three grains. The narrow point is within the

plane going through the center of these spheres, as pictured in the left side of figure 3. The biggest grain which

would be able to pass this void can be drawn as a circle, which is tangent to the outer three. Its diameter d p can

be calculated with simple, trigonometric considerations. This model was established by Silveira, who published

the void diameters for all possible combinations of five different grain sizes in form of a table [Silveira, 1965].

The use of four connected grains as limit for the void is a common assumption for the loosest state of packing

in a soil. The biggest possible pore is composed, if the centers of all spheres are within the same plane. Again,

the pore size can be found as the solution of an 2D-problem. It is shown on the right side of figure 3. Silveira

described the area of the pore A p dependent on the aperture angle . This function has a maximum which can

be found by solving the corresponding extremum problem [Silveira et al., 1975].

570

r2

r2

Ap

r1

dp

r1

r3

@

@

r4

r3

Figure 3: Model of pore constrictions for dense and loose packing after Silveira

He used the size of the circle with the same surface area than A p as pore diameter d p for the loose state. This

practice overestimates the void size, which can be seen in figure 4. Silveiras approach was later improved by

Muckenthaler, who figured out the exact solution for the diameter of the pore [Muckenthaler, 1989].

d p exact

*

Pore area A p

*

d of Silveira

A

AU

To calculate the constriction size distribution (CSD) of a soil, knowledge about the present number of grains is

needed. Two fractions with the same weight will have a different number of particles because of the different

grain sizes. The Prolix Program uses an approach of Ziems to calculate the particle size distribution by number

[Ziems, 1968].

After this step, every weighted fraction is represented by its mean particle size and the number of grains within

this fraction. This allows calculating the probability of occurrence for all possible combinations of grains and

the corresponding pore diameters. To receive the CSD, they are sorted by size and plotted in a cumulative curve

as shown in figure 5. The calculation using three grains leads to the CSD of a soil with maximum density.

The software part considering four grains in a random sample delivers the CSD for the loose state. Figure 5

pictures the CSD for the loose and dense state of a protective filter material and the possible options for the

bordering base material. All particles of soil I are smaller than the voids of the filter. They cannot be held back

and the material will erode completely. Soils II and III both contain grains which cannot pass the voids of the

filter. Only a part of the smaller grains will be washed out. Soil IV can be considered as mechanical stable

against the contact surface to the filter material. All grains therein are bigger than the largest calculated void

constriction. Prolix allows to rate the liability of contact erosion at the interface between a coarse filter and a

571

100

H

HH

j

H

HH

j

II

d p,min

III

IV

log d

d p,max

finer base material using the thoughts mentioned above. The CSD of a filter can be plotted together with the

PSD of another soil sample in a graph similar to figure 5.

fine

Sand

medium

coarse

fine

medium

Gravel

coarse

fine

Cobbles

Fines

Silt

coarse

medium

100

PSD

PSD

PSD

CSD

80

soil sample

fine fraction

coarse fraction

scope

60

40

20

0.002

0.006

0.02

0,06

0.2

0.6

Grain size [mm]

2.0

6.3

20

63

To evaluate the internal stability of a soil using this approach, the material has to be divided into two fractions.

The software treats the coarser fraction as the supporting and stable soil skeleton and the finer fraction as the

potentially mobile filling. For both fractions the PSD is calculated and shown, while the user is requested to

choose a dividing diameter ddiv interactively. A suggestion for ddiv is calculated and displayed according to

equation 6.

572

ddiv

< 1.87 (h0 )1.5

d100

(6)

This proposal is based on the findings of Burenkova who stated that the size of the biggest erodible grain is

lying within this intervall [Burenkova, 1993]. Figure 6 shows an evaluation chart given by Prolix for the internal

stability of a gap graded soil. Beneath the PSD of the original soil sample, the recalculated curves for the fine

and the coarse fraction of this soil are displayed. For the coarse fraction, the constriction size distribution is

calculated and shown for dense and loose bedding conditions. For the pictured example, ddiv was set to 1 mm.

Case study

To prove the convenience of the software it was used to evaluate the internal stability of an already conducted

dyke projekt in southern Germany. The investigation was based on available data of soil samples taken at the

project site. Figure 7 shows the corresponding PSDs. The internal stability of each sample was rated by the

fine

Sand

medium

coarse

fine

medium

Gravel

coarse

fine

Cobbles

Fines

Silt

coarse

medium

100

QS2BS2/1 H

H

Sand H

HH

80

60

QS3BS2H

HH

Gravel

QS4BS1H

40

QS2BS1/2 H

H

QS4BS3H

H

H

20

0.002

0.006

0.02

0,06

0.2

0.6

Grain size [mm]

HH

HH

QS3BS1

HH

H

HH

H QS1BS3/2

HH

HH

H QS1BS1/1

HH

H QS2BS3/2

2.0

6.3

20

63

software using the criteria mentioned earlier. Since the related functions of Prolix were not discussed in this

paper, the liability of contact erosion at the interface of two soils was not evaluated. The examination results

are summarized in table 2. Almost all soils are classified as stable against internal erosion.

Two of the samples are widely graded "mixed soils" with a high factor of uniformity h00 . They are out of the

confidence range in which the criterion of Burenkova is supported by experiments. Therefore, it would not be

appropriate to rate them using the criteria of Burenkova or Wan & Fell. Out of these two, sample QS4BS2 is

classified as unstable by the criterion of Kenney & Lau. This happens, because the slope of the PSD is relatively

flat for this soil. The H-F ratio is slightly under the borderline in a small area of the corresponding diagram.

The current stage of development allows no unambiguous rating using the presented pore model because the

dividing diameter ddiv depends on the user. Unfortunately, the suggestion based on Burenkovas findings varies

573

Sample

Gravel

Sand

QS1BS1/1

QS1BS3/2

QS2BS1/2

QS2BS2/1

QS2BS3/2

QS3BS1

QS3BS2

QS4BS1

QS4BS3

Table 2:

Burenkova

stable

stable

stable

stable

stable

stable

stable

stable

not valid

stable

not valid

Kenney & Lau

Wan & Fell

stable

very unlikely

stable

very unlikely

likely stable

very unlikely - unlikely

stable

very unlikely

likely stable

very unlikely - unlikely

stable

very unlikely

likely stable

very unlikely - unlikely

stable

very unlikely

stable

not valid

unstable

unlikely

unstable

not valid

in a wide range. Therefore, the results are not listed in table 2. Further research will be necessary to achieve an

unique and automated evaluation using this method.

Conclusions

The Prolix Software provides a user-friendly possibility for the application of established methods to estimate

the internal stability of grain structures. First applications for testing purposes show that it is already a useful

and convenient tool. Current work aims at the integration of functions for automated appraisals based on the

presented pore model. Prolix will be used to compare this new approaches to the common methods. A sufficient

control sample of soils with a known erosion behavior will be necessary, to validate the model.

References

[Burenkova, 1993] Burenkova, V. (1993). Assessment of suffusion in non-cohesive and graded soils. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Geo-Filters, Karlsruhe.

[Kenney & Lau, 1985] Kenney, T. & Lau, D. (1985). Internal stability of granular filters. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 23, 420423.

[Muckenthaler, 1989] Muckenthaler, P. (1989). Hydraulische Sicherheit von Staudmmen. Mnchen: Technische Universitt Mnchen.

[Silveira, 1965] Silveira, A. F. (1965). An analysis of the problem of washing through in protective filters. In

Proceedings of the 6th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Montreal.

[Silveira et al., 1975] Silveira, A. F., de Loreno, P., & Nogueira, J. B. (1975). On void-size distribution of

granular materials. In Proceedings of the 5th panamerican conference on soil mechanics and foundation

engineering, Buenos Aires.

[Terzaghi & Peck, 1948] Terzaghi, K. & Peck, R. B. (1948). Soil mechanics in engineering practice. New

York, NY: Wiley [u.a.].

[USBR, 1987] USBR (1987). United states bureau of reclamation, design standards no. 13: Embankment

dams.

[USDA, 1994] USDA (1994). United states departement of agriculture - national engineering handbook. chapter 26: Gradatation design of sand and gravel filters.

574

[Wan & Fell, 2004] Wan, C. & Fell, R. (2004). Experimental Investigation of Internal Instability of Soils in

Embankment Dams and their Foundations. Technical report, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

[Ziems, 1968] Ziems, J. (1968). Ein Beitrag zur Kontakterosion nichtbindiger Erdstoffe. PhD thesis, Technische Universitt Dresden.

575

- 12 Peat Soils of SarawakDiunggah olehHK
- Uncertainty Quantification by Using StochasticDiunggah olehLuis Alberto Izarra
- Soil Pore System1 [UDAH]Diunggah olehMutiaKhairunnisa
- Explanation About Our WebsiteDiunggah olehElianaParraF
- soli8Diunggah olehAmber Williams
- Pore Formation During Laser Beam WeldingDiunggah olehtazzorro
- 1-s2.0-S0016236112005492-main.pdfDiunggah olehemail4gau
- CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING CT III 2012-13.docxDiunggah olehrachna009
- IntJournalMineralResEng-v12n2-2007-CaracterizaçãoMecânicaPropriedadesEnchimento-Yilmaz et alDiunggah olehClovis Gonzatti
- AIRW 2007 Engineering BookDiunggah olehrlpr
- Chap 2.5 Porosity of MortarsDiunggah olehAalil Issam
- 08_chapter 3.pdfDiunggah olehSmit Shine
- Laporan Fisika Batuan 3712100017Diunggah olehKikiKartikaDewi
- Pore Structure of Air-Entrained Hardened Cement PasteDiunggah oleh1mattelliott
- JURNAL Cr-Karbon AktifDiunggah olehFebrian Dimas Adi Nugraha
- Projet d'Article Alterites de Foreke-dschang 07 10 2017' Sans Tableaux Et FiguresDiunggah olehAubin Tango
- SoilDiunggah olehAkbarlennon Exgema
- koefisien TanahDiunggah olehpatrik_rantetanayaho
- Gas Reservoir Performance in Abnormally High Pressure CarbonatesDiunggah olehGerman Rodriguez
- PatentDiunggah olehGaneshbabu Kodeboyina
- Sieve Analysis (Autosaved)Diunggah olehfifiee
- Hydel Poleline 2005-FULLDiunggah olehminitaur8
- Ec DarcyDiunggah olehDave Depp
- NewEQC_v1.01Diunggah olehFarid Akhechy
- Soil Testing ActDiunggah olehLAL SANKAR
- Core Laboratories - Formation Evaluation and PetrophysicsDiunggah olehTarek
- Rich Ppl HahitDiunggah olehRajiv Jeetun
- koreksi SPT.xlsxDiunggah olehRoza Wahyuni
- MCV work.docxDiunggah olehTamunosaki Awolayeofori
- geot.12.p.175Diunggah olehmichgeb

- finite elementDiunggah olehlaust69
- Équations de Navier-StokesDiunggah olehtalbi19196634
- Simultaneous Modeling of Internal Erosion and Deformation of Soil StructuresDiunggah olehbourbaki74
- Iterative Methods for Linear SystemsDiunggah olehbourbaki74
- 35 Computing the fuzzy topological relations of spatial objects based on induced fuzzy topology.pdfDiunggah olehBouhadjar Meguenni
- ArcPad ExerciseDiunggah olehbourbaki74
- voronoiDiunggah olehbourbaki74
- animaux.pdfDiunggah olehbourbaki74
- A Hybrid Segmentation Method Using MRF and GVF SnakesDiunggah olehbourbaki74
- Lines MatlabDiunggah olehSergi C. Cortada
- TriangulationDiunggah olehbourbaki74
- td5.pdfDiunggah olehbourbaki74

- IS_11855_GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN AND USE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF RUBBER SEALS FOR HYDRAULIC GATESDiunggah olehkiranrauniyar
- Clinical Laboratory Management - OrganizationDiunggah olehMaryam Zainal
- FOCPDiunggah olehSibtain Raza
- Dokadek30 Report EnDiunggah olehdragan321
- Purves 1981 - Microelectrode Methods for Intracellular Recording and IonophoresisDiunggah olehdfddddsdf2
- 5-14Diunggah olehHector Renzo Zarate Rodriguez
- Experimental DesignDiunggah olehfain
- BAÜBOCK e FAIST, Diaspora and Transnationalism Concepts, Theories and MethodsDiunggah olehTeresaSantos
- Toronto Region - Hydrogen Fuel Cells Innovation Snapshot - April 2011Diunggah olehTorontoResearch
- UsbFix ReportDiunggah olehsankarsada
- Chap7SDiunggah olehwsvivi
- productcatalogue.pdfDiunggah olehLincoln ZhaoXi
- Reflash InstructionsDiunggah olehcyberdemon08
- Synopsis 24 April Rev1Diunggah olehVirajitha Chimalapati
- Java Coding Std-1Diunggah olehfareeditmsec
- fdfl afkjsdf kblajfdDiunggah olehdsureshcivil
- KNPC Refinery ProjectsDiunggah olehathar4423
- IT Green Light_Case Study_englishDiunggah olehElisei Craciun
- Catálogo de Acessórios.pdfDiunggah olehRaul Vargas
- marketing strategy of hero hondaDiunggah olehkumarsah
- Why We Show Children How Sex WorksDiunggah olehsulica
- 95957334 LTE Frequency Planning V2 0Diunggah olehWael Alkodami
- Yip-and-Zambila-Chapter_PerForming-Art-Performance-as-Research-in-Contemporary-Artworks-Alannah-Marie-Halay.pdfDiunggah olehAdilia Yip
- Bill Gates Chart InterpretationDiunggah olehMoraru Mariana
- Atomically Thin P-n Junctions With Van Der Waals_NATUREDiunggah olehPolychronis Tsipas
- Surf Act Ants From Renewable ResourceDiunggah olehpholm123
- PDF March 2018Diunggah olehAnonymous 7HogO92
- Lesson Plan_Colligative PropertiesDiunggah olehJanine Pauline Sale Sierda
- Nanua Singh, Divakar Rajamani (auth.) Cellular Manufacturing Systems- Design, planning and control 1996 (1).pdfDiunggah olehIvan Dario Cordero Rodriguez
- Law Enforcement in the 21st Century-New Technologies for analysis-GIS-Biometrics-intelDiunggah olehDan Feidt