Abstract: This paper aims to present dynamic phenomena under major disturbances of EGAT power system. The
EGAT power system can be considered as a remote system connected to a main system via a long tie transmission line.
Dynamic phenomena on the tie transmission line are observed using two Phasor Measurement Units (PMU) that were
installed at the sending end bus and receiving end bus where the tie transmission line is connected. Dynamic
phenomena on the tie transmission line were observed during one year and were selected to present in this paper.
Static Var Compensator (SVC) and HVDC were installed in the EGAT power system to increase transient and dyamic
stability. These devices have enhanced stability function, which were designed to maintain stability and cecurity of the
remote system. Reactions of the SVC and HVDC under several disturbances were evaluated from PMU recorder. The
PMUs offers accurate measurement of voltage and current phasors. Moreover, phase angle between two power systems
are also calculated. These features allow engineers to analyses dynamic phenomena of the power system. Particular
disturbance has special dynamic characteristic which are analyzed in the paper.
The HVDC received electric power of 300 MW r Characterisation of Large Disturbance\HVDC-Trip Feb-24-2006 2319-23
phenomena of the real and reactive power flow of the tie 49.9 Hz
transmission line are shown in Fig.2. 49.90
BSP Frequency
BSP Real Power Flow [MW] BSP Reactive Power Flow [Mvar]SRT Real Power Flow [MW] SRT Reactive Power Flow [ 49.85
500
-100
SRT Reactive Power Fig.5 presents phase angle difference between the
-200
Central system and the Southern system. The Central
-300
SRT Real Power system is assigned as a reference bus. Therefore, positive
-400
Time in Seconds
angle value means power flow from the Southern system
to the Central system. It could be seen that the phase
r Characterisation of Large Disturbance\HVDC-Trip Feb-24-2006 2319-23 angle swung and settled within 13 seconds.
Phase Ang
Fig.2: Real and Reactive Power Flow of the Tie
5
244
95.2 MW
242 kV POD Action of the SVC -100
Time in Seconds
242
BSP Voltage
240 er Characterisation of Large Disturbance\BSP-SRT-circuit2_trip_Sep-6-0
238
Fig.7: BSP Real and Reactive Power during the Circuit
236 No.2 Tripped
SRT Voltage 234 kV
234
232
In Fig.8 presented dynamic phenomena during
230
10 s restoration of the circuit No.2. The circuit No.2 was
energized after the fault was cleared. Firstly, the BSP CB
228
360 365 370 375 380 385 390 395 400 was closed and then the SRT CB was closed at 12.7
Time in Seconds
second after that. When the BSP CB closed, BSP bus
r Characterisation of Large Disturbance\HVDC-Trip Feb-24-2006 2319-23
received -52.5 Mvar from VAR charging of the circuit
Fig.6: Voltage Magnitude Measured at BSP and SRT No.2.
At the time of the SRT CB was closed, the real and
The BSP voltage was 242 kV at the beginning reactive power oscillated again but the oscillation
whereas the voltage reference of the SVC was set at 240 frequency was 0.5 Hz and took 13.1 second to settle. The
kV. At the time of the incident, the BSP voltage started real and reactive power of both lines became equal again.
to swing from 242 kV to 234 kV and then turned up to The power oscillation records confirmed that the power
246 kV. The SRT voltage began at 237 kV and then also system has better system damping when the tie
swung following the BSP voltage. Since the tie transmission line was two circuits in service. Namely,
transmission line transferred more real power flow, the the power oscillation in case of two circuits in service
BSP and SRT voltage dropped to 240 kV and 234 kV at decayed and finished faster than the case of one circuit in
the final respectively. From the PMU records, they were operation.
also confirmed that the POD of the SVC could help the
EGAT transmission system to damp the inter-area BSP Real Power Line 1 [MW] BSP Reactive Power Line 1 [Mvar]BSP Real Power Line 2 [MW] BSP Reactive Power Line 2
oscillation. 10
12.7 s
1272 MCM ACSR conductors. The tie transmission line -40
real and reactive power on the tie transmission line Fig.8: BSP Real and Reactive Power during the Circuit
oscillated with oscillation frequency of 0.42 Hz. The No.2 Closed
BSP real power swung from -36.2 MW to -95.2 MW and
The BSP and SRT voltages during the circuit No.2 deviation of 150 MW. The FLC function was described
tripped were presented in Fig.9. At the time of the line in details in [1].
tripped, the POD of SVC was not activated even the Fig.11 presents real and reactive power flow at BSP and
power oscillation occurred on circuit No.1. It might be SRT during the FLC was activated. The large power
concluded that the performance of the POD was reduced plant in Malaysia transmission grid was tripped and
when the tie transmission line was not two circuits in system frequency dropped over the acceptable limit.
operation. The BSP voltage behavior in Fig. 10 also Therefore, the FLC was activated by an activation signal
confirmed that the POD of the SVC could perform when from HVDC converter station at Gurun (Malaysia). The
the circuit No.2 was in service. These incidents lead to HVDC started to draw the DC power from EGAT
modification of the POD function of the SVC in feature. transmission grid. The HVDC drew the real power about
130 MW. The real power flow on the tie transmission
BSP Voltage [kV] SRT Voltage [k line increased from 35 MW to 170 MW within 2
246
seconds. It could be seen that there was a small
244
oscillation with frequency of 0.58 Hz. The tie
242 kV transmission line flow was recovered back to the
242
previous flow (35 MW) in 10 second. The real power
240
swing occurred after FLC action with magnitude of 14
MW.
238
It could be observed that the real power flow of BSP
236 kV
236
and SRT has large difference because the tie
transmission line had changed configuration. It was
234 sectioned to LANG SUAN (LSN) substation. The tie
10 s
232
transmission line is now called 230 kV BSP-LSN-SRT
30 35 40 45 50
Time in Seconds
55 60 65 70
rather than the 230 kV BSP-SRT.
er Characterisation of Large Disturbance\BSP-SRT-circuit2_trip_Sep-6-0
BSP Real Power Flow [MW] BSP Reactive Power Flow [Mvar]SRT Real Power Flow [MW] SRT Reactive Power Flow [
100
244
242 kV 10 s
242 50
BSP Real Power
240
0
SRT Real Power
300 305 310 315 320
BSP Reactive Power
325 330 335 340
238
POD Action
-50
SRT Reactive Power
236
234 kV -100
Time in Seconds
234
49.94
Action of the FLC can consider as a disturbance of the r Characterisation of Large Disturbance\HVDC FLC Activate at Gurun Aug-25-
observed that the Southern system frequency had an Energized 500 kV 100 MW
100 SRT Real Power
oscillation frequency of 0.58 Hz.
Power flow deviation on the tie transmission line 50 BSP Real Power
has difference in characteristic. It did not activate the BSP Reactive Power
POD function of the SVC even there was the power 0
250 300 350 400 450
oscillation during the FLC action. Hence, the BSP
voltage was regulated by the SVC and the SRT voltage -50
-150
Time in Seconds
BSP Voltage [kV] SRT Voltage [k
245
242kV
242 Fig.14: Real and Reactive Power Flow of the Tie
BSP Voltage
Transmission Line (230 kV BSP-LSN-SRT)
BSP Frequency SRT Frequen
239
50.20
233
50.1 Hz
50.10
10 s
230
300 305 310 315 320 325 330 335 340 50.05
Time in Seconds
Line BSP2-CBG
Fig.15: The Central and the Southern systems frequency
To support demands in the feature, the 500 kV line
BSP2-CBG was constructed. The 500 kV line connected BSP Voltage [kV] SRT Voltage [k
to the BSP substation via a tie transformer and the other 260
power flow at SRT also reduced from -73 Mvar to -114 Fig.16: Voltage Magnitude Measured at BSP and SRT
Mvar. The reactive power had slow increased. It took
approximately 25 seconds to settle. The Central system When the 500 kV line was complete in service. The
frequency and the Southern system frequency were real power flows oscillated due to a configuration change
shown in Fig. 15. At the time of the energization, of the Central system. It resulted in real power flows
frequency was not changed because there was no real changes. Moreover, the reactive power flows of the tie
power change. The BSP and SRT voltage were shown in line recovered close to the previous value. Both system
Fig. 16. The BSP and SRT voltage decrease in the first frequencies were also oscillated, which could see in
Fig.15. Since the 500 kV line was completed in service, observed that the Southern system frequency began
the BSP and SRT voltage were also reduced. However, oscillate and trended to apart from the Central system
the voltages were still high and did not recover close to even there were not change in real power. It could be
the previous value. The POD action of SVC was not confirmed that the synchronous link could not still
found even the power oscillation occurred on the tie operate.
transmission at the time of the 500 kV line energize
completion. The reason of this incident might be BSP Frequency SRT Frequen
limitation of the SVC. Namely, The BSP voltage was too 50.05
50.01
50.0 Hz
6. System Disturbance due to 80 MW load 50.00
and Area Control Error (ACE) function did not Characterisation of Large Disturbance\Import AC from TNB April 24-2006 0839-08
construct. If both AC systems are connected, the power Fig.18: The Central and the Southern systems frequency
system will be losing system stability. Therefore, the during Load Transferring
EGAT transmission grid can import electricity by
transfer partial load about 80 MW at SADAO (SDO) 115 Phase Angle d
0.0°
AC transmission line and then the EGAT transmission 0
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
grid will cut the partial load. The partial load is now
-1
connected to the Malaysia transmission grid.
-2
BSP Real Power Flow [MW] BSP Reactive Power Flow [Mvar]SRT Real Power Flow [MW] SRT Reactive Power Flow [
-3
120 -4.0°
10 s -4
100
80 MW
80 -5
SRT Real Power Time in Seconds
60
-60
SRT Reactive Power 241
POD Action
-80 240 kV
Time in Seconds
Synchronous Link 240
239
It could imagine that if the synchronous link between Characterisation of Large Disturbance\Import AC from TNB April 24-2006 0839-08
EGAT and TNB were still performed, the tie Fig.20: BSP and SRT Voltage during Load Transferring
transmission line will oscillate.
The Central system frequency and the Southern It was also observed from Fig.19 that the phase
system frequency were presented in Fig.18. It could be angle between the Central system and Southern system
trended to unstable. The Southern system was very close
to Malaysia. Therefore, the southern system frequency
was affected by the Malaysia transmission grid.
The BSP and SRT voltage were shown in Fig.20. It
could be observed that the BSP voltage was not much
change because the SVC regulated voltage at this bus.
The SRT voltage had small fluctuation. The POD of the
SVC was not activated because the real power on the tie
transmission line was not a power oscillation. It was
activated at the end of load transferring. It could be
considered as EGAT transmission grid sudden lost load
about 70 MW.
7. CONCLUSION
This paper presented five categories of the large
disturbance in the EGAT transmission grid, which
consist of the 300 MW HVDC tripped, one circuit of the
tie transmission line tripped, Frequency Limit Control
action, large reactive power impact, and dynamic
phenomena of the power system during synchronization
of two large electric power systems.
The PMUs records were utilized to characterize
dynamic phenomena of the five disturbances. The
observation on the tie transmission line offered better
understanding on dynamic phenomena in a large electric
power system. Dynamic behaviours of the power system
during the enhanced control function were investigated.
The observation results leaded to investigation of the
SVC and HVDC performance. Moreover, this work
could be used to confirm power system studies and
adviced system operator in order to prevent system
security and stability.
Reference:
[1] Nitus Voraphonpiput, Kittipon Chuangaroon, and
Somchai chatrattana, “Parameter Optimization for
Frequency Limit Controller of EGAT-TNB HVDC
Interconnection System” Conference of Electric
Supply Industry 2004 (CEPSI 2004)