By fourth group
SPEECH PRODUCTION
Introduction
This chapter will explain the process by which a speaker turns a mental concept
into a spoken utterance.
Speech Errors
Such errors in production, called speech errors or slips of the tongue, occur
regularly in normal conversation.
Speakers used complete sentences 98% of which were grammatically
correct.
Dilsfluencies
Many utterances are characterized by hesitations, repetitions, false starts,
and filler word such as um, well, or you know (sometimes called filled
pauses).
34
Phonemic Segments
In anticipation errors, sound which will come later in the utterance
inappropriately appear earlier than intended. In preservation errors, a
sound produced early in the utterance reappears in an incorrect location
later in the utterance. Other error types include deleted or added phonemes
or phoneme exchange (reverse) errors as llustrated below:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The Syllable
35
The major argument in support of the syllable as a processing unit is based on the
fact that exchanged syllables seem to obey a structural law with regard to
syllable place; that is, initial segments replace initial segments, and final syllable:
exchange with final syllables.
Stress
Fromkin (1977) argues -again from speech error data -that because stress
ca disordered like other phonemic features, it should be viewed as an
independent production unit, for example: apples of the Origin =>apples
of the oRIgin.
No one would question that words are discrete units in the production
process. even if errors such as those below were rare, which they are not.
tend to turn '%'>out turn to tend out (word exchange)
I Love to dance $1 dance to love (exchange)
Really must go? I must really go ( word movement)
Lexical search, or the process by which the individual words are retrieved
the mental dictionary, is also reflected in patterns of speech disfluency.
example, hesitations (unfilled pauses) are more likely to occur before 00
words such as nouns, verbs, and modifiers than before content words such
articles, helping verbs. Pauses are also longer before content words than
words.
36
1.
2.
3.
4.
Grammatical Rules
Here are some examples in which grammatical rules are misapplied:
the last I knew about it =9... I knowed about it
I dont know that Id know one ifl heard it =>...that Id hear_ one if] knew
it
bunnies [s=/2/] dont eat steak =>steaks [s=/s/] dont eat bunny
an aunts (/s/) money=> moneys(/2/) aunt
he always keeps a pack '=>he always packs a keep
a watched (/t/) pot never boils '=$>a potted (/ed/) watch never boils
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The model could also allow the generation of more than one message at
stage I that ould be mapped onto one or more syntactic blending- How
long does that has to~have to simmer?-or allow multirepresentations at
any of the other levels.
Stage III. Intonation Contours (Sentence and Phrasal Stress) Are Generated
On The Basis of The Syntactic Representations.
In this model, it is at this level that sounds in words and sentence elements
are assigned locations in the eventual surface sequence. Atthis level, form
based word substitutions occur, as well as sound exchanges, stranding
exchanges, and word and morpheme shifts. In the Garret model, the
phonologization of grammatical morphemes takes place at the level of
phonetic representation.
LeveIts Model
38
information about the lemmas, which he believes are stored and accessed
separately (called lexemes).
The phonological encoder then takes the syntactic outline and generates a
phonological plan for the utterance, which includes its eventual intonation
and stress patterns. The articulator then executes the phonetic plan by
conveying instructions to the neuromuscular system.
Dell Model
In this model, words are organized into networks with connection between
uni based on semantic and phonological relatedness. The activation of a
concept spreads activation to those lexical items sharing semantic features
with the thought to be conveyed. Because activation is presumed to be
bidirectional, it is theoretically possible to have interactions between
semantic and phonological representations, leading to slips that share both
phonological and semantic properties with the intended output.
39
Summary
This chapter has discussed the planning units and stages that form the
bridge between a concept and its grammatical expressions. The process
involved on the speakers end of speech chain elude easy description and
explanation. One cannot go into speakers brains and examine the mental
processes and computations that are taking place when they are producing
an utterance.
In the attempt to understand this process, more and more linguists and
psycholinguists have turned to speech error and other speech disfluency
data. Deviant utterances serve as windows into the mind, showing that the
semi continuous speech signal is composed of discrete units of different
sizes and kinds, that speech is not produced simply by uttering one sound,
or syllable, or word at a time. By examining the constraints on the kinds of
errors that occur, we have been able to construct models and posit what
levels of representation and what computations can occur at each stage.
The model presented in this chapter still do not reveal all the complexities
and constraints and kinds of representations that are computed in the
course of producing even single short utterance. However, by attempting
to explain not only errorless production, but also those utterances that
contain slips of the tongue or fluency failures, they point to the question
about speech production process that are still unanswered, which is always
the first step in the quest for understanding.
Question Test
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
40