Anda di halaman 1dari 98

Method of Consistent

Deformation
Structural Analysis
By
R. C. Hibbeler

Theory of Structures-II
M Shahid Mehmood
Department of Civil Engineering
Swedish College of Engineering and Technology, Wah Cantt

FRAMES
Method of consistent deformation is very useful for
solving problems involving statically indeterminate
frames for single story and unusual geometry.
Problems involving multistory frames, or with high
indeterminacy are best solved using the slope deflection
or moment distribution or the stiffness methods.

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 6
Determine the support reactions on the frame shown. EI
is constant.
8 kN/m
A

5m

Actual Frame

4m

B
3

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
8 kN/m
A

5m

Actual Frame

4m

By inspection the frame is indeterminate to the first


degree.
4

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
We will choose the horizontal reaction at support B as
the redundant.
The pin at B is replaced by the roller, since a roller will
not constraint B in the horizontal direction.
8 kN/m
A

Primary Structure

B
B

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

8 kN/m

Solution
Principle of Superposition

Primary Structure
8 kN/m
A

B
B

5m

Actual Frame

4m
B

redundant Bx
applied
Bx

B
Bx fBB6

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

8 kN/m

Solution
Compatibility Equation

0 B Bx f BB
Primary Structure
8 kN/m

B
B

5m

Actual Frame

4m
B

redundant Bx
applied
Bx

B
Bx fBB7

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation

0 B Bx f BB
The terms B and fBB will be computed using the method
of virtual work.
The frame s x coordinates and internal moments are
shown in figure.
It is important that in each case the selected coordinate
x1 or x2 be the same for both the real and virtual loadings.
Also the positive directions for M and m must be same.
8

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
For B we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit load at B
8 kN/m

A
1 kN

x1

M 1 20 x1 4 x12

x1

20 kN

m1 0.8 x1

0.8 kN

M2 0

m2 1x2
x2
B

x2
B
1 kN

20 kN

0.8 kN
9

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

2
5 20 x 4 x 0.8 x dx
4 01x dx
Mm
1
1
1
1
2
2
B
dx

dx
0 EI
0
0
EI
EI
166.7
166.7

0
EI
EI
L

8 kN/m

A
1 kN

x1

M 1 20 x1 4 2x1

x1

20 kN

m1 0.8 x1

0.8 kN

M2 0

m2 1x2
x2
B

x2
B
1 kN

20 kN

10

0.8 kN

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
For fBB we require application of real unit load acting at B
and a virtual unit load acting at B
A
1 kN
x1

m1 0.8 x1

0.8 kN

m2 1x2
x2
B
1 kN
0.8 kN
11

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

mm
0.8 x1 dx1
01x2 dx2
f BB
dx

dx
0 EI
0
0
EI
EI
26.7 21.3 48.0

EI
EI
EI
L

A
1 kN
x1

m1 0.8 x1

0.8 kN

m2 1x2
x2
B
1 kN
0.8 kN

12

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation

0 B Bx f BB

(1)

Substituting the data in Eq. (1)

166.7
48.0
0
Bx

EI
EI

Bx 3.47 kN

ANS

13

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Equilibrium Condition
Showing Bx on the free body diagram of the frame in the
correct direction, and applying the equations of
equilibrium, we have
40 kN
A
Ax
Ay

2.5 m

2.5 m
4m

B
3.47 kN
By

14

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Equilibrium Condition

40 kN
A
Ax
Ay

2.5 m

2.5 m
4m

B
3.47 kN

Fx 0;

Ax 3.47 0

Ax 3.47 kN

By

M A 0; 402.5 B y 5-3.474 0 By 22.8 kN

Fy 0;

Ay 40 22.8 0

Ay 17.2 kN
15

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 7
Determine the moment at fixed support A for the frame
shown. EI is constant.

4 ft

5f

10
0l
b/

ft

8 ft

A
3 ft
Actual Frame

16

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

4 ft

5f

10
0l
b/

ft

C
Actual Frame

8 ft

A
3 ft

By inspection the frame is indeterminate to the first


degree.
17

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
B

The capacity of the frame to


support a moment at A is
removed and therefore a pin is
used at A for support.

10
0l
b/

ft

MA can be directly obtained by


choosing as the redundant.
C

Actual Frame

18

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
Reference to point A


ft

10
0l
b/

10
0l
b/
C

A
A
actual frame

(1)

ft

0 A M A AA

A
primary structure

MAAA
A

MA

Redundant MA applied
19

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation

0 A M A AA

(1)

The terms A and AA will be computed using the method


of virtual work.
The frame s x coordinates and internal moments are
shown in figure.

20

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
Reference to point A
0.05 lb

222.5 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb

3 5
4

x2

x2

296.7 lb

0.0833 lb
0.0667 lb

m2 0.0667 x2

M 2 296.7 x2 50 x22

m1 1 0.0833 x1

M 1 29.17 x1

x1

x1
29.17 lb

0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft

300 lb

21

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
For A we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit couple moment at A
0.05 lb

222.5 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb

3 5
4

x2

x2

296.7 lb

0.0833 lb
0.0667 lb

m2 0.0667 x2

M 2 296.7 x2 50 x22

m1 1 0.0833 x1

M 1 29.17 x1

x1

x1
29.17 lb

0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft

300 lb

22

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

2
8 29.17 x 1 0.0833 x dx
5 296.7 x 50 x 0.0067 x dx
Mm
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
A
dx

0
0
0
EI
EI
EI
518.5 303.2 821.8

EI
EI
EI
L

0.05 lb

222.5 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb

3 5
4

x2

x2

296.7 lb

0.0833 lb
0.0667 lb

m2 0.0667 x2

M 2 296.7 x2 50 x22

m1 1 0.0833 x1

M 1 29.17 x1

x1

x1
29.17 lb

0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft

300 lb

23

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
For AA we require application of real unit couple
moment and a virtual unit couple moment at A
0.05 lb

x2

0.0833 lb
0.0667 lb

m2 0.0667 x2

m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0

24

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila


8 1 0.0833 x dx
5 0.0067 x dx
m m
1
1
2
2
AA
dx

0
0
0
EI
EI
EI
3.85 0.185 4.04

EI
EI
EI
2

0.05 lb

x2

0.0833 lb
0.0667 lb

m2 0.0667 x2

m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0

25

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

821.8
4.04
M A

EI
EI

M A 204 lb. ft

10
0l
b/

ft

Solution
Substituting these results into
Eq. (1), and solving yields

ANS

The negative sign indicates MA


acts in opposite direction to that
shown in figure.

MA =204 lb.ft

26

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 8
Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending
moment diagrams. EI is constant.

2 k/ft

10 k

15 ft

D
Actual Frame
30 ft
27

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
B

2 k/ft

10 k

15 ft

A
Actual Frame

30 ft

Degree of indeterminacy = 2
28

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
We will choose the horizontal reaction Dx and vertical
reaction Dy at point D as the redundants.
Actual Frame
B

2 k/ft

10 k

Dx

D
Dy

29

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is obtained by removing the hinged
support at point D.

2 k/ft

10 k

D
Primary Structure

30

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
B

2 k/ft

10 k

D
Dy

Primary Structure

Dx

31

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
B

Dx

DyDx=DxfDyDx
DxDx=DxfDxDx
Redundant Dx applied

32

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
C
B

DyDy=DyfDyDy

Dy
DxDy=DyfDxDy
Redundant Dy applied

33

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
'
'
0 Dx DxDx
DxDy
Dx Dx f DxDx D y f DxDy

(1)

'
'
0 Dy DyDx
DyDy
Dy Dx f DyDx D y f DyDy

(2)

The equations for bending moments for the members of


the frame due to external loading and unit values of the
redundants are tabulated in the table.
By applying the virtual work method, we will find Dx, Dy,
fDxDx, fDyDx, fDxDy, fDyDy,
34

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
B

M2

2 k/ft

10 k
x2

M1

M3
x1

10 k
A

x3

1050 k-ft
60 k

Member

Origin

Limits

M (k-ft)

AB

0-15

-1050+10x1

CB

0-30

-x22

DC

0-15

35

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation

mDx2

C
x2

mDx1

mDx3
x1

1k

x3

Member

1k
D

Origin

Limits

M (k-ft)

mDx (k-ft/k)

AB

0-15

-1050+10x1

-x1

CB

0-30

-x22

-15

DC

0-15

-x3

36

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation

mDy2

C
x2

mDy1
30 k-ft
A

mDy3
x1

x3
D

1k
Member

1k

Origin

Limits

M (k-ft)

mDx (k-ft/k)

mDy (k-ft/k)

AB

0-15

-1050+10x1

-x1

30

CB

0-30

-x22

-15

x2

DC

0-15

-x3

37

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Dx

Dx

241875
106875 135000 0
k ft 3
EI

Dy

Dy

2
15 1050 10 x x
30 x 15
MmDx
1
1
2
dx
dx1
dx 2
0
0
EI
EI
EI
15 0 x
3

dx3
0
EI

MmDy
EI

15

dx

1050 10 x1 30 dx
EI

641250
438750 202500 0
k ft 3
EI

30

x x dx
2
2

EI

38

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
f DxDx

f DxDx

9000 3

ft
EI

f DyDy

f DyDy

15 x
30 15
15 x
mDx mDx
3
1
dx
dx1
dx 2
dx3
0
0
0
EI
EI
EI
EI

mDy mDy
EI

15

dx

30 2 dx
EI

30

x2 2 dx
EI

22500 3

ft
EI
39

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
f DxDy f DyDx

f DxDy f DyDx

mDx mDy
EI

15

dx

x1 30 dx
EI

30

15x2 dx
EI

10125 3

ft
EI

40

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Dx

241875

k ft 3
EI

Dy

641250

k ft 3
EI

f DxDx

9000 3

ft
EI

f DyDy

22500 3

ft
EI

f DxDy f DyDx

10125 3

ft
EI
41

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Now put these values in the Equations (1) and (2)

0 241875 9000 Dx 10125 D y

(1)

0 641250 10125 Dx 22500 D y

(2)

By solving (1) and (2) simultaneously we get

Dx 10.503 k

D y 33.226 k
42

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Applying equations of equilibrium, we have the other
support reactions as
2 k/ft

10 k

0.503 k

A
53.22 k-ft
26.774 k

10.503 k

D
33.226 k

43

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Shear diagram

26.774
C

10.503

-0.503

-33.226

44

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Moment diagram

118.447

C
60.765

157.545

60.765
157.545

53.22

45

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

TRUSSES
The degree of indeterminacy of a truss can be find using
Equation b+r > 2j.
where
b = unknown bar forces, r = support reactions,
2j = equations of equilibrium
This method is quite suitable for analyzing trusses that
are statically indeterminate to the first or second degree.

46

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 9
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.
AE is same for all members.
400 lb
D

6 ft

B
8 ft
Actual Truss
47

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.

b + r = 2j
6 + 3 = 2(4)
9>8
9 8 = 1st degree

400 lb
D

6 ft

B
8 ft
Actual Truss
48

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
The force in member AC is to be determined, so member
AC is chosen as redundant.
This requires cutting this member, so that it cannot
sustain a force, making the truss S.D. and stable.
400 lb
D

6 ft

Actual Truss

B
8 ft

49

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

400 lb
D

Actual Truss

=
400 lb
D

FAC

AC

FAC

FACfACAC

Primary Structure

Redundant FAC applied

50

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
With reference to member AC, we require the relative
displacement AC, which occurs at the ends of cut
member AC due to the 400-lb load, plus the relative
displacement FACfACAC caused by the redundant force
acting alone, be equal to zero, that is
0 AC FAC f ACAC
400 lb

FAC

AC

FAC
FACfACAC

Primary Structure

Redundant FAC applied

51

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
Here the flexibility coefficient fACAC represents the
relative displacement of the cut ends of member AC
caused by a real unit load acting at the cut ends of
member AC.
0 AC FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D

FAC

AC

FAC
FACfACAC

Primary Structure

Redundant FAC applied

52

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
This term, fACAC, and AC will be computed using the
method of virtual work.

0 AC FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D

FAC

AC

FAC

FACfACAC

Primary Structure

Redundant FAC applied

53

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
For AC we require application of the real load of 400 lb,
and a virtual unit force acting at the cut ends of member
AC.
+400
D

-50
0

C
1 lb

+300

-0.8

400 lb

1 lb

-0.6

-0.6
+1

+1

400 lb
A

+400
300 lb

B
300 lb

-0.8
54

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
nNL
AE
0.8400 8 0.6 0 6 0.6 300 6 1 500 10 10 10
2

AE
AE
AE
AE
AE

11200

AE

AC

+400
D

-50
0

C
1 lb

+300

-0.8

400 lb

1 lb

-0.6

-0.6
+1

+1

400 lb
A

+400
300 lb

B
300 lb

-0.8
55

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
For fACAC we require application of the real unit forces
acting on the cut ends of member AC, and virtual unit
forces acting on the cut ends of member AC
-0.8

-0.8

D
1 lb
-0.6

1 lb

+1

-0.8

1 lb
-0.6

+1

-0.6

-0.6
+1

x
B

1 lb

+1

-0.8
56

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

n2 L
f ACAC
AE
0.82 8 0.6 2 6 1210
2
2
2

AE
AE
AE

34.56

AE
-0.8

-0.8

D
1 lb
-0.6

1 lb

+1

-0.8

1 lb
-0.6

+1

-0.6

-0.6
+1

x
B

1 lb

+1

-0.8
57

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Substituting the data into Eq. (1) and solving yields
11200 34.56
0

FAC
AE
AE
FAC 324 lb (T)

ANS

Since the numerical result is positive, AC is subjected to


tension as assumed.
Using this result, the forces in other members can be
found by equilibrium, using the method of joint.
58

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 10
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.

6 ft

B
8 ft
Actual Truss
59

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 11
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. E = 29,000 ksi

(6 in.2)

E
2)

28 k

2)

n.
4i

(6

(4 in.2)

(4 in.2)

n.
6i

in. 2
)

15 ft

A
(6 in.2)

25 k

(6 in.2)

25 k

(6 in.2)

3 panels at 20 ft = 60 ft
Actual Truss

60

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.
b + r = 2j
9 + 4 = 2(6)
13 > 12
13 12 = 1st degree
(6 in.2)

E
2)

28 k

2)

n.
4i

(6

(4 in.2)

(4 in.2)

n.
6i

in. 2
)

15 ft
D

A
(6 in.2)

(6 in.2)

25 k

25 k

(6 in.2)

3 panels at 20 ft = 60 ft
Actual Truss

61

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

Ax

28 k

A
B
Ay

Actual Truss

25 k

Dx

C
25 k

Dy

Dx at hinged support D is selected as Redundant.


Primary structure is obtained by removing the effect of
Dx and replacing hinge by roller support there.
Primary structure is subjected separately to external
loading and redundant Force Dx.
62

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

28 k

Primary
Structure

D
Ax

A
B
Ay

25 k
E

30

18

25 k
24

11

Dy
28 k

.67

53
25

.33

28 k A
52

18 k

B
25 k

42.67

25 k

42.67

D
32 k

63

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
D is horizontal deflection at point D of primary
structure due to external loading.

30

18

24

11

28 k

.67

53
25

Primary
Structure
.33

28 k A
52

18 k

B
25 k

42.67

25 k

42.67

D
32 k

64

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

F
Redundant
Dx is applied

Dx

A
B

D
DD=DxfDD

1k

0
0

fDD

1k
1

D
65

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

F
Redundant
Dx is applied

Dx

A
B

D
DD=DxfDD

DD is horizontal deflection at point D due to redundant


force Dx.

66

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

fDD is horizontal deflection at point D due to unit force.

1k

0
0

fDD

1k
1

D
67

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation

0 D Dx f DD
28 k

Dx

Ax
Ay

25 k

25 k

Dy

=
28 k

Primary
Structure
D

Ax

Ay

25 k

25 k

Dy

Redundant
Dx is applied
Dx

DD=DxfDD
68

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
We will use virtual work method to find D and fDD.
Deflection of truss is calculated by

where
n=
N=

nNL
D
AE

axial force in truss members due to virtual unit load


acting at joint and in the direction of D
axial force in truss members due to real load acting
that causes D
69

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
We will use virtual work method to find D and fDD.
Deflection of truss is calculated by
2

f DD
where
n=
n=

n L

AE

axial force in truss members due to real unit load


acting at joint and in the direction of D
axial force in truss members due to virtual unit load
acting at joint and in the direction of D
70

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
TABLE
Member

L (in.)

A (in.2)

N (k)

n (k)

nNL/A
(k/in.)

n2L/A

F=N+nDx

AB

240

52

2,080

40

6.22

BC

240

42.67

1,706.8

40

-3.11

CD

240

42.67

1,706.8

40

-3.11

EF

240

-24

-24

BF

180

18

18

CF

180

25

25

AE

300

-30

-30

BF

300

11.67

11.67

DF

300

-53.33

-53.33

5,493.6

120

nNL 5,493.6 k/in.

AE
E
2
n L 120 (1/in.)

AE
E

D
f DD

71

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

nNL
D
AE
52 1 20 12 42.67 1 20 12 42.67 1 20 12
D

6E
6E
6E
2080 1706.8 1706.8
D

6E
6E
6E
5493.6 k/in
D
E

72

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

f DD

n2 L

AE

f DD

1 1 20 12 1 1 20 12 1 1 20 12

6E
6E
6E

f DD

120 (1/in)

Now put these results into Equation (1)

5493.6
120
Dx
0
E
E

Dx 45.78 k
73

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

F N nDx
FAB 52 1 45.78 6.22 (T)

FBC 42.67 1 45.78 3.11 (C)

FCD 3.11 (C)


Equation of Equilibrium
28 k

F 0
Ax 28 45.78 0
Ax 17.78 k
Ay 18 k
D y 32 k

Dx=45.78

Ax=17.78
Ay=18

25 k

25 k

Dy=32

74

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

28 k

Primary
Structure

Ax =17.78

Dx = 45.78
A

25 k

25 k
Dy = 32

Ay =18
E

30

18

24

11

28 k

.67

53
25

.33

Dx = 45.78

Ax =17.78
A
Ay =18

6.22

B
25 k

3.11

25 k

3.11

D
Dy = 32

75

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 12
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. EA = constant. E = 200
GPa., A = 4000 mm2
F

70 kN
10m

A
B
80 kN

80 kN
4 panels at 10m= 40m
Actual Truss

76

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Degree of Indeterminacy = 2
b+r>2j
14 + 4 > 2 8
18 > 16
F
G

Ax

70 kN

E
B

Ay

80 kN

D
80 kN

Actual Truss

Dy

Ey
77

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Dy at support D and force FBG in member BG are selected
as redundants.

Ax

70 kN

E
B

Ay

80 kN

D
80 kN

Actual Truss

Dy

Ey
78

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
The roller support at D is removed and member BG is
cut to make the structure determinate.

Ax

70 kN

E
B

Ay

80 kN

D
80 kN

Determinate Truss

Ey
79

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual
loading, redundant Dy and redundant force in the
redundant member BG.
F

70 kN

BG
A

E
B
80 kN

80 kN

Primary structure subjected to actual loading

80

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual
loading, redundant Dy and redundant force in the
redundant member BG.
F

BG,D=DyfBG,D
G

E
B

DD=DyfDD D
Dy

Redundant Dy applied

81

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual
loading, redundant Dy and redundant force in the
redundant member BG.
F

BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
G
FBG

FBG

E
B

D,BG=FBGfD,BG D

Redundant FBG applied

82

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

70 kN
Actual Truss

Ax

E
B

Ay

C
80 kN

80 kN

Dy

Ey

70 kN

BG
A

E
B

80 kN

Primary structure

80 kN

+
F

BG,D=DyfBG,D
G

H
Redundant Dy applied

E
B

BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
G
FBG

DD=DyfDD D
Dy
H

FBG

Redundant FBG applied

E
B

D,BG=FBGfD,BGD

83

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
F

BG,D=DyfBG,D
G

H
Redundant Dy applied

E
B

DD=DyfDD D
Dy

H
Unit load in the direction
of Dy applied

fBG,D

E
B

fDD
1

84

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
F

BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
G
FBG

Redundant FBG applied

FBG

E
B

D,BG=FBGfD,BG D

fBG,BG
F

G
1

Unit force in member


BG applied

E
B

fD,BG

D
85

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila


F

Compatibility
Equation

70 kN
Actual Truss

Ax

E
B

Ay

80 kN

80 kN

Dy

Ey

70 kN

BG
A

E
B

0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG

80 kN

Primary structure

80 kN

0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG

BG,D=DyfBG,D
G

H
Redundant Dy applied
E

A
B

BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
G
FBG

DD=DyfDD D
Dy
H

FBG

Redundant FBG applied

E
B

D,BG=FBGfD,BGD

86

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG
D = vertical deflection at joint D of primary truss due to external loading
BG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to external loading
fDD = vertical deflection at joint D due to a unit load at joint D
fBG,D = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit load at D
fBG,BG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit force
fD,BG = vertical deflection at joint D due to a unit force in member BG
87

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
We will use the method of virtual work to find the
deflections
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG

NnD L
D
AE
BG

NnBG L

AE

f DD

nD nD L

AE

f BG

nBG nBG L

AE

f D, BG

nD nBG L

AE

f BG, D

nBG nD L

AE

88

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
NnD L
nD nD L
D
f DD
AE
AE
nBG nBG L
NnBG L
f BG
BG
AE
AE

f D, BG

f BG, D

nD nBG L

AE
nBG nD L

AE

N = member forces due to external loading


nD = member forces due to unit load at joint D
nBG = member forces due to unit force in member BG

The numerical values of the member forces, as computed


by the method of joints, are shown in next figures, and
are tabulated in the TABLE
89

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
N = member forces due to external loading
F
11

70

85

3.5

73
6
.
6

36

80

85

10

0
9.6

70 kN
10

9.6

E
152.5

B
80 kN

82.5

02

152.5

77.5

C
80 kN

77.5

77.5

90

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
nD = member forces due to unit load at joint D
F
0.3

0.5

0.3

54

54

0.5

5
0.3

1.0

E
0.25

0.25

61

0.25

0.75

0.75

D
1 kN

0.75

91

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
nBG = member forces due to unit force in member BG

0.707

0.707

0.707

0
0

E
0

0.707

92

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila


Member

L (m)

N
(kN)

nD
(kN/kN)

nBG
(kN/kN)

NnDL
(kN.m)

NnBGL
(kN.m)

nD2L
(m)

nBG2L
(m)

nDnBGL
(m)

F = N + nDDy +
nBGFBG (kN)

AB

10

152.5

-0.25

-381.25

0.625

128.373

BC

10

152.5

-0.25

-0.707

-381.25

-1078.175

0.625

1.768

104.265

CD

10

77.5

-0.75

-581.25

5.625

5.12

DE

10

77.5

-0.75

-581.25

5.625

5.12

FG

10

-85

0.5

-0.707

-425

600.95

2.5

-3.535

-60.855

GH

10

-85

0.5

-425

2.5

-36.747

BF

10

80

-0.707

-565.60

55.891

CG

10

-0.707

-24.109

DH

10

-1

10

-96.507

AF

14.142

-116.673

0.354

-584.096

1.772

-82.51

BG

14.142

14.142

34.1

CF

14.142

3.536

-0.354

-17.702

50.006

1.772

14.142

-5.006

3.473

CH

14.142

109.602

0.354

548.697

1.772

143.765

EH

14.142

-109.602

1.061

-1644.541

15.92

-7.208

-4472.642

-992.819

48.736

48.284

-6.773
93

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG

4,472.642 kN .m
D
AE
BG

992.819 kN .m

AE

f DD

48.736 m

AE

f BG, BG

48.284 m

AE

f BG, D f D , BG

6.773 m

AE

By substituting these values into the above equations


94

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
4,472.642 48.736 D y 6.773FBG 0
992.819 6.773D y 48.284 FBG 0

Solving these equations simultaneously for Dy and FBG


D y 96.507 kN
FBG 34.1 kN

95

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

The remaining reactions of the indeterminate truss can


now be determined by superposition of reactions of
primary truss due to the external loading and due to
each of the redundants.
The forces in the remaining members of the
indeterminate truss can be determined by using the
superposition relationship

96

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila


11

7
6.6

3.5

85
36

80

kN
170
09
.60
2

152.5 C

B
80 kN

77.5 D

77.5

80 kN

77.5

+
0.3

0.5

0.3

54
0

54

0.5
5
0.3

H
1.0

61

E
0.25

0.25

0.75 D

0.25
F

0.707 G
1
1

0.707

0.75

1 kN
0

0.75

H
0

E
0

0.707 C

.51

128.373

Ay=58.373

3.4
34

73

.1

104.265

80 kN

36.747

14

65
3.7

70 kN
96.507

60.855

24.109

82

55.891

=
F

Ax=70

E
152.5

85
02
9.6

A
82.5

10

0.707

70

7.2

5.12
5.12
C
D
80 kN
Dy=96.507

08

Actual Truss

Ey=5.12
97

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila


Actual Truss

Ax=70

55.891

3.4
1
2.5

128.373

104.265

36.747

73

.1
34

80 kN

Ay=58.373

3
14

.76

5.12

70 kN
7.2

96.507

60.855

24.109

08

E
5.12

80 kN

Dy=96.507

Ey=5.12

98

Anda mungkin juga menyukai