HOTELS IN INDIA
TRENDS & OPPORTUNITIES
Kaushik Vardharajan
Managing Director - HVS Hospitality Services
Juie S. Mobar
Associate Director - Special Projects
www.hvs.com
HVS 6th Floor, Building 8-C, DLF Cyber City, Phase - II, Gurgaon 122 002, INDIA
The only thing we learn from History is that we learn nothing from History.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Introduction
As we go to press with this year's edition of
the Trends & Opportunities report, we do so
against a backdrop of reduced GDP growth, a
plummeting rupee, increased economic and
political uncertainty and a general
sentiment that India has lost its way.
Resultantly, most stakeholders seem to be
playing a wait-and-watch game until the
general elections next year. Industries and
sectors across the spectrum such as
automobile, FMCG, and residential real
estate have reported slowing sales and even
declines in some cases. While the overall
economic scenario has also had an impact on
the hospitality industry, it is important to
remember that hospitality, like many other
industries, is cyclical in nature and that while
we are in the down cycle right now, things
will improve and markets and investors will
start seeing positive momentum in the next
12-18 months. People seem to have
forgotten that our industry has been through
such downturns before and has always
bounced back stronger, with periods of slow
growth being followed by strong occupancy
and average rate performance.
It is, therefore, very important for us to get
beyond the over-simplified commentary in
the press and closely examine the four
parameters that impact overall hotel
industry performance, namely supply,
demand, occupancy and average rate. In
this year's report, we have shown how and
why these parameters have changed in
recent years and also how we expect them to
change going forward. Through our analysis
later in this report, we aim to present a
balanced account on what is well with the
hotel industry in India and where we have
challenges, so that stakeholders can make
informed decisions based on an
understanding of ground realities and not
just perceptions.
The Trends & Opportunities report, based on
the results of the Trends & Opportunities
Survey conducted by HVS annually, depicts
and analyses the key trends in the hotel
performance of the country and presents
151
160
150
900
131
129
800
124
128
129
137
126
133
133
130
126
122
122
127
140
127
120
700
120
600
100
500
80
400
60
300
40
200
717
861
551
698
462
586
407
495
349
424
316
397
268
348
Number of Hotels
252
335
235
312
211
289
215
271
199
256
199
255
174
216
180
232
163
214
122
183
120
182
100
20
-
12.0%
60
10.0%
50
8.0%
40
6.0%
30
4.0%
20
2.0%
10
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
Supply
Inflation (WPI)
Exhibit 3: Contribution of Travel and Tourism Towards Indias GDP (2011 and 2012)
6,600
6.7%
6,400
6.6%
6,200
6.5%
6,000
6.4%
5,800
6.3%
5,600
6.2%
5,400
6.1%
5,200
6.0%
2011
2012
Total Contribution of Travel and Tourism Towards India's GDP (`, billion)
Expressed as a % of GDP
Source: WTTC Travel & Tourism Economic Impact 2013 - India
Tourism Overview
United Nations World Tourism Organization
(UNWTO) in its Tourism Highlights 2013
Edition reports that the total number of
international tourist arrivals worldwide
surpassed the one billion mark for the first
time in history in 2012, touching 1.04 billion
from 995 million in 2011. The Asia Pacific
region recorded the strongest growth at
7.0% during this period.
The total contribution of Travel and Tourism
to India's GDP was 6.6% (`6,385 billion) in
2012 and is projected to rise to 7.3% in 2013,
according to World Travel & Tourism
Council's (WTTC's) Economic Impact
2013 India report (Exhibit 3). Domestic
travel spends generated 80.3% of the direct
Travel and Tourism GDP, with domestic
tourist visits (1,036 million) registering an
increase of close to 20% over 2011.
International Tourist Arrivals, on the other
hand, were recorded at 6.6 million in 2012,
an increase of 4.3% over the previous year.
Foreign Exchange Earnings also rose by
7.1% over the same period. The top three
international source markets for India
continued to be USA (15.8%) followed by UK
(11.9%) and Bangladesh (7.4%)2.
The Travel and Tourism industry has shown
a sturdy resilience in the face of global
economic uncertainties in the past; we
2
Demand
69.0%
80,000
70,000
71.5%
71.4%
64.8%
55.4%
60,000
53.9%
57.2%
51.6%
80.0%
68.8%
70.0%
59.5%
57.2%
59.5%
60.6%
59.3%
58.4% 60.0%
50.0%
50,000
40,000
40.0%
30,000
30.0%
20,000
20.0%
10,000
-
10.0%
Occupancy
Table 1: Supply and Demand Trends Across Major Cities (2008/09 2012/13)
Pune
Nationwide
17.8%
Agra
Ahmedabad
Bengaluru
Chennai a
Delhi b
Gurgaon c
NOIDA d
Goa
Hyderabad
Jaipur
Kolkata
Mumbai e
17.3%
-0.5%
-6.9%
Occupancy
58.8%
56.7%
55.8%
62.4%
63.0%
58.7%
45.1%
68.8%
50.3%
54.1%
69.5%
63.8%
58.0%
58.4%
2012/13
Average Rate
6,380
3,863
6,007
5,380
7,539
6,870
6,704
6,423
4,861
4,917
6,093
7,646
3,992
5,803
Note
Supply tracked for Agra in 2012/13 is lower than 2011/12 due to the removal of unbranded hotels from the sample set in light of adequate
branded supply reporting
Existing Supply tracked for NOIDA in 2012/13 is significantly higher than 2011/12 owing to a larger sample set and new supply entering
the market
For all tables
a - Chennai (includes Sriperumbudur and Oragadam)
b - Delhi NCR data in 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2012/13
c - Gurgaon (including Manesar) data from 2009/10 to 2012/13
d - NOIDA (including Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2012/13
e - Mumbai (includes Navi Mumbai)
63.2%
62.3%
62.5%
60.0%
7,000
63.9%
63.4%
60.3%
59.3%
6,750
62.5%
6,500
60.3%
59.4%
6,250
6,000
57.5%
5,750
55.0%
5,500
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
5,400
64.9%
63.9%
65.0%
58.8%
60.0%
54.1%
55.0%
50.0%
5,150
52.5%
48.6%
4,900
44.2%
45.0%
41.8%
40.0%
4,650
39.0%
38.8%
35.0%
4,400
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
NA
14.7%
1,966
1,714
Two-star
1,432
1,212
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
7.4%
6.0%
-2.6%
3,267
3,354
5.1%
Three-star
1,543
1,457
1,505
1,673
1,696
1,669
1,670
1,830
2,212
3,012
3,488
3,530
3,255
3,348
-2.3%
-4.8%
5,843
4,794
4,905
4,905
4,638
5,745
6,135
7,652
5,722
5,111
6,506
4,985
3,847
3,088
2,580
2,246
2,368
2,392
2,168
2,296
1,825
2,515
1,418
Five-star
Four-star
3,315
3,516
4.8%
3,044
2,538
6,380
6,410
7,268
3,897
3,372
3,114
3,277
3,447
3,368
3.9%
-3.8%
-2.6%
8,948
5,803
6,032
9,189
9,350
6,513
6,489
9,277
11,096
7,722
7,989
11,200
9,778
7,071
5,444
7,168
5,606
4,299
3,569
4,686
4,335
3,269
3,467
4,668
5,102
3,731
3,505
4,910
5,572
3,903
5,613
3,688
3,986
4,991
3,025
4,019
Five-star Deluxe
2012/13
2011/12*
2010/11
2009/10
2008/09
2007/08
2006/07
2005/06
2004/05
2003/04
2002/03
2001/02
2000/01
1999/00
1998/99
1997/98
1996/97
1995/96
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
Overall Average
Compounded
Growth
12-Month**
Change
NA
-3.7%
62.3%
64.8%
Two-star
0.2%
0.5%
-1.4%
56.1%
56.9%
58.5%
55.5%
56.2%
64.7%
68.9%
65.9%
56.7%
59.6%
53.6%
49.7%
48.8%
47.7%
47.0%
49.2%
51.5%
Three-star
48.2%
-1.0%
-4.2%
-0.2%
59.8%
56.6%
59.1%
60.0%
60.7%
61.9%
58.6%
60.3%
58.5%
58.5%
67.2%
68.9%
71.7%
70.2%
70.4%
72.7%
71.8%
71.1%
68.7%
66.8%
57.0%
56.4%
52.7%
51.4%
56.1%
58.7%
53.2%
55.7%
56.4%
58.2%
60.5%
57.9%
58.5%
65.7%
67.5%
Four-star
55.9%
-1.2%
-0.8%
-1.5%
0.3%
59.9%
58.4%
59.3%
59.8%
60.9%
60.6%
59.5%
61.6%
62.5%
59.5%
68.8%
71.7%
73.0%
71.4%
71.5%
73.8%
71.4%
69.0%
65.0%
64.8%
57.2%
59.3%
52.2%
51.6%
57.2%
60.9%
58.3%
53.9%
55.4%
60.2%
62.0%
57.1%
62.9%
2001/02
2000/01
1999/00
1998/99
1997/98
1996/97
1995/96
Five-star
2002/03
67.6%
2003/04
2004/05
74.0%
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
66.5%
2011/12*
Five-star Deluxe
2012/13
12-Month**
Change
Overall Average
Compounded
Growth
Survey Results
36.3
43
42.2
37
43.5
35
47.2
36
50
69
99
73
2001/02
705
821
624
Four-star
Three-star
2,000
725
1,477
1,939
3,480
2,276
1997/98
702
1,283
1,983
3,354
2,162
1998/99
718
1,153
1,876
2,863
1,889
1999/00
816
1,404
1,934
3,107
2,134
2000/01
843
1,248
1,684
2,437
1,789
2001/02
20
19
Three-star
36.3
20
41
53
96
63
1997/98
42.2
18
43.5
16
44.9
18
31
43
43
27
44
34
69
48
2000/01
66
43
1999/00
77
50
1998/99
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
Source: HVS Research
Exchange Rate
35.4
31
25
32.4
58
53
Five-star
Four-star
Two-star
95
92
Five-star Deluxe
66
62
1996/97
Overall Average
1995/96
47.2
18
26
36
52
38
2001/02
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
Source: HVS Research
Two-star
1,104
1,698
Five-star
3,374
2,974
Five-star Deluxe
2,320
2,012
1996/97
Overall Average
1995/96
44.9
37
53
77
50
114
77
83
2000/01
113
81
1999/00
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
Source: HVS Research
Exchange Rate
Two-star
35.4
61
70
52
40
44
37
Four-star
Three-star
32.4
79
128
91
89
155
141
78
90
124
110
1998/99
Five-star Deluxe
Five-star
104
1997/98
93
1996/97
Overall Average
1995/96
48.2
19
26
37
53
39
2002/03
895
1,267
1,775
2,571
1,870
2002/03
48.2
35
47
65
90
68
2002/03
46.0
22
39
49
66
50
2003/04
995
1,772
2,252
3,046
2,313
2003/04
46.0
36
56
73
102
78
2003/04
44.9
23
49
62
89
66
44.5
33
63
79
119
87
2005/06
1,458
2004/05
2,797
1,038
3,509
5,290
3,892
2005/06
44.5
50
86
112
161
122
2005/06
2,217
2,771
4,003
2,966
2004/05
44.9
41
69
87
125
96
2004/05
43.6
48
84
105
164
116
2006/07
2,075
3,665
4,567
7,138
5,049
2006/07
40.2
56
98
128
200
137
2007/08
2,257
3,942
5,142
8,030
5,496
2007/08
40.2
87
43.6
142
69
190
278
199
2007/08
117
149
224
162
2006/07
45.9
43
73
93
151
100
2008/09
1,985
3,362
4,250
6,933
4,598
2008/09
47.7
38
59
79
120
81
2009/10
1,806
2,797
3,756
5,715
3,861
2009/10
47.7
68
45.9
97
77
134
194
136
2009/10
125
158
242
168
2008/09
45.6
43
65
87
125
87
2010/11
1,959
2,977
3,949
5,694
3,947
2010/11
45.6
73
108
140
205
143
2010/11
48.0
23
40
61
76
114
75
54.5
23
34
53
61
98
62
2012/13
1,226
1,110
2011/12*
2,869
1,832
1,909
3,309
5,361
3,388
2012/13
54.5
36
60
88
107
164
107
2012/13
2,942
3,626
5,491
3,575
2011/12*
48.0
36
70
102
128
192
126
2011/12*
4.0%
7.6%
-8.7%
-2.5%
NA
3.4%
-15.4%
-2.7%
0.8%
4.4%
-14.1%
0.4%
-14.0%
-19.6%
0.0%
Compounded
Growth
NA
-16.5%
12-Month**
Change
10.4%
6.5%
3.5%
-2.4%
-4.0%
3.1%
Compounded
Growth
NA
-5.2%
12-Month**
Change
1.0%
4.2%
2.9%
-14.2%
1.9%
-13.9%
1.7%
-16.1%
0.8%
Compounded
Growth
-14.2%
-15.3%
12-Month**
Change
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
-
Number of Rooms
Future Supply
Over the years, HVS has followed a
comprehensive approach for tracking new
hotel development. We would like to state
that a lot of effort goes into collating this data
and then verifying many of these projects
across various cities in terms of their
development stage. Our tracking omits any
flippant statements made to the media or
announcements made by real estate
developers to promote their brand and,
therefore, get greater visibility. Thus, as we
do each year, we have put together a list of
developments under construction or those
announced in each market that have a
confirmed tie-up with an operator. Such
developments have been analysed rationally,
through the prism of an unbiased third party,
for the probability factor of their
development within the next five years.
From 1,14,466 branded rooms in 2007/08,
the highest in the last seven years, the total
proposed supply was down to 84,650 rooms
in 2012/13. Considering this in conjunction
with the 138% growth in existing supply
over the same period, one can attribute the
decline in proposed supply partially to a
substantial number of previously planned
rooms becoming operational. Additionally,
Compounded
Growth
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
1,336
1,336
1,419
1,439
1,439
1,739
1,299
519
675
800
1,521
1,785
1,975
2,477
25.4%
29.8%
Bengaluru
2,414
3,456
3,889
5,597
5,947
7,713
8,536
10.7%
23.4%
Chennai
2,442
2,826
3,307
3,806
4,066
4,904
6,086
24.1%
16.4%
Delhi **
7,990
9,019
8,625
8,129
9,111
10,697
11,338
6.0%
6.0%
1,980
3,246
3,782
4,472
18.3%
31.2%
40.7%
Agra a
Ahmedabad
Gurgaon
NOIDA b
2012/13
12-Month*
Change
2006/07
300
351
527
836
58.6%
Goa
2,450
2,768
2,795
3,288
3,375
3,885
4,309
10.9%
9.9%
Hyderabad
1,868
2,554
2,761
3,782
4,036
4,797
5,322
10.9%
19.1%
Jaipur
Kolkata
1,388
1,556
1,683
2,472
2,554
3,054
3,875
26.9%
18.7%
1,354
1,396
1,373
1,520
1,588
1,787
2,163
21.0%
8.1%
Mumbai
7,402
8,454
7,948
9,877
11,303
12,052
12,807
6.3%
9.6%
777
1,346
1,518
2,672
4,691
5,672
5,817
2.6%
39.9%
9,345
11,596
12,357
15,412
18,039
21,729
24,142
11.1%
17.1%
39,285
46,982
48,475
61,795
71,531
84,313
93,479
10.9%
15.5%
Pune
Other Cities ***
Total
*
** Delhi NCR data (shaded portion), rest Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data
*** Other Cities (includes all other hotel markets across India)
a - Supply tracked for Agra in 2012/13 is lower than 2011/12 due to the removal of unbranded hotels from the sample set in light of adequate
branded supply reporting
b - Existing supply tracked for NOIDA in 2012/13 is significantly higher than 2011/12 owing to a larger sample set and new supply entering the market
Source: HVS Research
Table 8: Proposed Branded Hotel Rooms Across Major Cities (2012/13 2017/18)
Existing Supply
2012/13
Proposed
Supply
Increase in
Future Supply
Active Development
of Supply
Luxury
Upscale
Mid Market
Budget
Extended Stay
Agra
1,299
866
67%
76%
11.5%
0.0%
76.0%
12.5%
0.0%
Ahmedabad
2,477
1,857
75%
66%
11.6%
47.9%
20.8%
19.8%
0.0%
Bengaluru
8,536
10,731
126%
75%
22.8%
22.5%
20.2%
23.7%
10.7%
Chennai
6,086
5,331
88%
65%
6.5%
11.8%
43.9%
31.3%
6.5%
11,338
6,144
54%
84%
17.8%
23.4%
38.8%
20.0%
0.0%
4,472
5,033
113%
53%
38.0%
20.2%
24.0%
16.2%
1.6%
Delhi
Gurgaon
NOIDA
836
5,615
672%
28%
44.6%
36.2%
10.6%
6.8%
1.8%
Goa
4,309
2,622
61%
62%
26.9%
19.7%
29.7%
23.8%
0.0%
Hyderabad
5,322
3,433
65%
87%
0.0%
16.9%
40.7%
37.8%
4.6%
Jaipur
3,875
2,859
74%
56%
2.0%
44.0%
23.9%
30.1%
0.0%
Kolkata
2,163
3,511
162%
64%
28.3%
27.0%
31.4%
13.3%
0.0%
Mumbai
12,807
9,802
77%
42%
31.6%
18.9%
27.1%
18.0%
4.4%
5,817
3,705
64%
67%
15.2%
8.9%
52.6%
23.3%
0.0%
Other Cities
24,142
23,141
96%
55%
1.9%
23.9%
46.6%
26.4%
1.2%
Total
93,479
84,650
91%
60%
17.1%
23.0%
34.4%
22.6%
3.0%
Pune
Table 9: Distribution of Existing and Proposed Branded Hotel Rooms Across Major Cities (2006/07 2012/13)
Existing Supply
Proposed Supply
Total
1,336
519
2,414
2,442
7,990
1,336
675
3,456
2,826
9,019
2,450
2,768
1,868
2,554
1,388
1,556
1,354
1,396
7,402
8,454
777
1,346
9,345 11,596
39,285 46,982
1,419
800
3,889
3,307
8,625
1,439 1,439
1,521 1,785
5,597 5,947
3,806 4,066
8,129
9,111
1,980 3,246
300
351
2,795
3,288 3,375
2,761 3,782 4,036
1,683
2,472 2,554
1,373
1,520 1,588
7,948
9,877 11,303
1,518
2,672
4,691
12,357 15,412 18,039
48,475 61,795 71,531
1,739
1,975
7,713
4,904
10,697
3,782
527
3,885
4,797
3,054
1,787
12,052
5,672
21,729
84,313
1,299
2,477
8,536
6,086
11,338
4,472
836
4,309
5,322
3,875
2,163
12,807
5,817
24,142
93,479
670
3,664
15,542
7,147
22,360
400
3,058
10,784
4,945
16,560
510
667
2,339
2,319
9,819 12,509
5,995
7,819
20,021 18,608
3,058
3,353
10,619
8,250
4,012
2,937
3,644
5,965
11,578 10,613
8,072
8,243
19,476 25,722
1,01,971 1,14,466
2,178
5,884
3,357
4,025
13,386
8,054
21,484
94,115
1,736
2,154
5,302
5,713
2,664
4,867
3,481 3,612
7,477 12,121
5,196
5,545
24,909 26,504
89,449 102,438
650
2,550
9,716
7,547
5,626
5,818
5,522
2,422
5,265
3,356
3,118
10,896
4,645
26,224
93,355
866
1,857
10,731
5,331
6,144
5,033
5,615
2,622
3,433
2,859
3,511
9,802
3,705
23,141
84,650
32%
60%
61%
68%
56%
55%
47%
60%
71%
51%
75%
71%
58%
67%
53%
41%
69%
65%
72%
75%
22%
73%
67%
57%
75%
53%
77%
45%
58%
35%
56%
56%
80%
69%
71%
58%
87%
55%
37%
53%
74%
52%
74%
47%
69%
48%
76%
66%
75%
65%
84%
53%
28%
62%
87%
56%
64%
42%
67%
55%
58%
47%
56%
67%
49%
77%
58%
42%
64%
53%
49%
62%
66%
60%
31%
73%
53%
62%
73%
52%
60%
41%
63%
77%
51%
60%
67%
65%
58%
58%
60%
67%
60%
58%
60%
16,581
16,894
16,518
16,000
14,000
12,000
9,557
10,000
5,923
6,000
4,000
8,302
7,115
8,000
8,295
5,468
3,710
4,409
2,400
1,957
2,000
Agra
Ahmedabad
Bengaluru
Chennai
Delhi
Gurgaon
* The supply for 2017/18 has been computed by adding the active future supply to the existing base of rooms in 2012/13
Source: HVS Research
NOIDA
2012/13
Goa
Hyderabad
Jaipur
Kolkata
Mumbai
Pune
2017/18
160,000
140,000
120,000
93,479
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
24,905
20,000
2000/01
Source: HVS Research
2012/13
Number of Rooms
2017/18
Trendline
-2.0%
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
a - Delhi NCR data (shaded portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2012/13
-1.4%
0.2%
13.0%
58.0%
63.8%
63.7%
51.3%
46.7%
62.4%
62.5%
50.9%
62.2%
60.6%
74.6%
69.5%
83.4%
77.9%
76.2%
83.1%
86.4%
68.9%
71.0%
72.0%
69.7%
63.4%
52.0%
64.6%
64.5%
67.6%
65.3%
73.0%
81.0%
Mumbai
Pune
0.2%
0.5%
-0.6%
-2.0%
54.1%
69.5%
70.0%
55.2%
57.7%
68.3%
67.5%
57.3%
54.1%
69.5%
73.9%
64.7%
65.5%
75.5%
76.4%
65.7%
67.2%
69.0%
62.8%
58.8%
44.9%
65.4%
66.4%
48.3%
55.0%
62.9%
54.8%
47.0%
45.6%
57.8%
63.8%
Kolkata
51.7%
58.4%
55.9%
52.2%
Jaipur
61.8%
0.6%
-0.8%
-6.8%
0.4%
68.8%
50.3%
54.0%
68.5%
67.7%
57.1%
53.3%
65.1%
61.1%
55.8%
65.7%
72.2%
72.8%
72.1%
82.0%
67.8%
62.5%
78.7%
75.9%
59.3%
60.5%
68.9%
68.0%
53.6%
60.6%
69.1%
61.3%
53.3%
58.6%
66.0%
53.4%
59.2%
58.4%
62.1%
58.1%
Goa
Hyderabad
54.8%
-15.2%
-3.8%
-5.3%
-19.8%
45.1%
58.7%
62.0%
80.7%
74.0%
NOIDA
56.2%
66.5%
66.0%
Gurgaon
-0.8%
-1.8%
-5.0%
-1.2%
63.0%
62.4%
65.7%
63.8%
68.7%
67.2%
62.1%
68.3%
67.3%
63.1%
72.8%
73.9%
76.9%
74.7%
78.2%
80.8%
79.1%
72.9%
66.6%
73.1%
60.4%
58.3%
56.5%
53.3%
58.9%
64.6%
65.3%
52.9%
54.1%
64.7%
68.4%
60.2%
Delhi a
80.2%
84.6%
71.7%
Chennai
67.3%
0.1%
-1.4%
-1.5%
55.8%
56.6%
58.4%
53.2%
54.6%
65.3%
72.5%
76.7%
81.4%
78.5%
72.0%
64.3%
69.8%
64.4%
59.0%
61.2%
71.3%
Bengaluru
67.2%
1.2%
3.0%
-5.4%
56.7%
58.8%
57.1%
59.9%
54.3%
60.2%
55.9%
58.2%
61.2%
52.4%
58.3%
73.3%
67.9%
58.9%
56.0%
69.1%
68.3%
57.1%
50.0%
63.2%
53.8%
30.7%
33.7%
53.2%
55.8%
42.5%
40.1%
50.8%
58.0%
46.4%
46.1%
71.8%
65.8%
51.7%
2006/07
2005/06
2004/05
2003/04
2002/03
2001/02
2000/01
1999/00
1998/99
1997/98
1996/97
Trident Hyderabad
1995/96
2007/08
Agra, Pune, Goa and Jaipur were the only major hotel
markets in the country to record notable RevPAR growths
in 2012/13. There has been a surge in domestic demand,
which appears to have a positive correlation with the
falling rupee as taking holidays abroad have become
increasingly expensive. In fact, our research reveals that
the growing trend of vacations within India is visible
across other major leisure markets such as Kerala and
Udaipur (not being tracked individually in this report);
reaffirming our belief that domestic tourism will be a
driving force for the industry going forward. Another
benefit of this trend is the reduction in seasonality of
these leisure markets, with domestic visitations helping
narrow the gap in demand recorded during peak and lean
periods.
55.7%
2008/09
47.6%
2009/10
Ahmedabad
2010/11
2011/12*
2012/13
Agra
12-Month**
Change
Compounded
Growth
3,086
4,269
3,985
5,103
3,714
7,470
8,762
4,804
6,909
4,357
5,801
9,192
5,378
10,406
3,526
4,715
2006/07
6,255
10,429
6,340
9,827
4,351
5,262
2007/08
6,271
9,811
6,677
9,495
4,754
5,322
2008/09
8,834
5,710
6,597
4,540
5,773
2009/10
5,137
Kolkata
Mumbai
6,229
3,556
1,836
6,169
3,951
2,473
1,646
6,297
3,888
2,533
1,579
5,661
3,557
2,514
1,867
5,555
3,698
2,902
2,316
4,932
3,409
2,949
2,414
2,603
4,184
2,917
2,728
2,541
2,805
4,356
3,021
2,980
2,774
89
85
75
83
89
114
108
155
98
197
70
81
2005/06
133
211
123
239
81
108
2006/07
155
259
158
244
108
131
2007/08
137
214
145
207
104
116
2008/09
185
120
138
95
121
2009/10
32.4
35.4
68
36.3
170
109
42.2
138
88
62
39
43.5
130
82
45
43
44.9
124
82
65
52
47.2
104
72
62
51
48.2
54
87
61
57
53
46.0
61
95
66
65
60
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
a - Delhi NCR data (shaded portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2012/13
Source: HVS Research
Exchange Rate
176
159
Mumbai
Pune
52
100
47
96
Jaipur
Kolkata
45
44.9
78
107
72
77
84
44.5
110
136
87
99
109
43.6
150
200
121
121
137
40.2
197
272
163
141
156
45.9
163
233
146
130
137
47.7
122
177
128
95
108
45
67
93
72
166
62
67
2004/05
46
57
85
67
105
52
53
2003/04
Hyderabad
57
92
78
45
41
2002/03
118
65
101
79
50
39
2001/02
5,810
8,428
6,087
4,539
5,146
157
63
95
79
80
61
35
2000/01
7,493
10,679
6,686
5,982
6,297
69
73
111
70
62
38
1999/00
7,946
10,932
6,575
5,664
6,271
NOIDA
63
135
110
81
53
50
1998/99
6,523
8,738
5,288
5,285
5,962
Goa
66
113
100
95
50
56
1997/98
4,915
6,041
3,887
4,407
4,870
173
94
89
76
52
1996/97
3,521
4,822
3,240
3,461
3,772
Gurgaon
86
71
Bengaluru
Delhi a
66
Ahmedabad
Chennai
49
Agra
1995/96
Table 12: Key Operating Characteristics by Major Cities Average Rate (US$)
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
a - Delhi NCR data (shaded portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2012/13
Source: HVS Research
Pune
1,518
3,104
Jaipur
1,604
1,499
2,754
4,089
3,323
4,832
3,111
3,622
2005/06
Hyderabad
2,676
4,338
3,752
3,224
2,787
3,012
2004/05
5,613
2,914
4,526
3,535
3,735
2,410
2,431
2003/04
7,496
2,727
4,115
3,602
3,796
2,164
1,954
2002/03
2,220
2,863
4,626
3,025
3,424
2,354
1,840
2001/02
Goa
2,303
4,913
3,600
3,254
2,736
1,586
2000/01
NOIDA
2,347
4,007
3,054
3,451
3,977
2,705
1,638
1999/00
8,247
3,540
2,779
Chennai
Delhi a
2,220
1,906
1998/99
Gurgaon
3,136
2,300
Bengaluru
1,833
2,027
2,678
1,826
1,593
2,132
Agra
Ahmedabad
1997/98
1996/97
1995/96
Table 11: Key Operating Characteristics by Major Cities Average Rate (`)
45.6
109
180
141
104
114
133
170
166
189
124
149
94
137
2010/11
4,949
8,194
6,408
4,718
5,173
6,056
7,752
7,554
8,634
5,632
6,776
4,285
6,243
2010/11
48.0
87
165
126
99
105
128
155
159
170
115
131
82
124
2011/12*
4,163
7,923
6,049
4,727
5,026
6,162
7,416
7,639
8,174
54.5
73
140
112
90
89
118
123
126
138
99
110
71
117
2012/13
3,992
7,646
6,093
4,917
4,861
6,423
6,704
6,870
7,539
5,380
6,007
6,293
5,524
3,863
6,380
2012/13
3,917
5,958
2011/12*
8.5%
4.4%
2.4%
4.0%
7.2%
7.2%
6.4%
-3.7%
-5.9%
5.5%
4.0%
5.8%
3.6%
-0.7%
3.1%
-15.0%
0.9%
-15.5%
3.9%
-8.4%
4.0%
3.2%
-7.8%
-10.0%
2.3%
0.8%
2.6%
0.4%
5.3%
-11.3%
-14.8%
-8.2%
-20.4%
-20.8%
-18.8%
-14.2%
-15.9%
-13.1%
-5.7%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
-4.1%
-3.5%
0.7%
4.0%
-3.3%
4.2%
-9.6%
-10.1%
-7.8%
-2.6%
-4.5%
-1.4%
7.1%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
4,161
Kolkata
Mumbai
1,072
4,547
1,988
4,028
2,442
1,279
879
1,363
4,257
2,247
1,155
1,042
1,678
3,651
1,949
1,182
1,144
1,453
3,589
2,326
1,596
1,600
1,766
2,666
2,402
2,565
2,264
1,424
1,642
1,434
2,312
1,997
3,036
1,933
2,653
1,897
1,752
2,105
1,830
3,121
2,213
3,793
1,523
1,216
2003/04
1,848
1,908
1,225
1,751
1,666
2,470
1,880
2,701
1,164
600
2002/03
80
76
51
73
67
Chennai
a
Delhi
61
129
Kolkata
Mumbai
Exchange Rate
35.4
128
56
30
25
36.3
111
67
35
24
42.2
93
51
28
26
43
43.5
84
45
21
26
34
44.9
80
52
36
36
39
47.2
54
48
30
35
31
49
42
51
27
13
2001/02
48.2
38
55
40
26
37
34
51
39
56
24
13
2002/03
46.0
42
66
41
38
46
40
68
48
82
33
27
2003/04
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
a - Delhi NCR data (shaded portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2012/13
32.4
25
Jaipur
Pune
27
Hyderabad
37
59
55
56
34
15
2000/01
91
44.5
44.9
104
66
65
89
73
125
77
151
48
45
2005/06
67
77
50
52
66
56
90
61
135
42
38
2004/05
43.6
125
156
91
79
99
97
162
92
173
55
64
2006/07
40.2
137
203
121
91
102
112
192
115
159
79
76
2007/08
5,522
8,155
4,859
3,665
4,120
4,516
7,707
4,616
6,417
3,189
3,068
2007/08
45.9
101
141
101
70
76
84
144
91
113
64
61
2008/09
4,661
6,473
4,648
3,234
3,515
3,829
6,600
4,210
5,181
2,908
2,790
2008/09
6,034
3,546
3,509
2,642
3,227
2009/10
126
74
74
55
68
2009/10
2,957
5,268
4,108
2,601
2,743
47.7
62
110
86
55
58
77
116
43
Goa
39
50
52
45
31
15
1999/00
5,440
6,807
3,992
3,462
4,299
4,223
7,069
4,017
7,544
2,394
2,777
2006/07
NOIDA
60
58
48
31
23
1998/99
4,084
4,603
2,970
2,895
3,993
3,257
5,582
3,407
6,720
2,150
2,028
2005/06
114
81
75
58
36
26
1997/98
3,042
3,472
2,236
2,326
2,969
2,491
4,036
2,708
6,081
1,904
1,720
2004/05
Gurgaon
60
50
Bengaluru
27
23
37
Agra
Ahmedabad
1996/97
1995/96
* The 2011/12 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2012/13 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2011/12
a - Delhi NCR data (shaded portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2012/13
Pune
792
1,980
Jaipur
879
1,371
2,177
2,452
2,514
1,252
620
2001/02
3,654
871
Hyderabad
1,379
2,503
1,948
2,236
1,527
674
2000/01
Goa
2,958
2,329
1,920
1,374
657
1999/00
5,443
2,697
2,112
2,720
1,288
884
1998/99
5,547
2,190
Delhi a
2,839
2,107
1,316
934
1997/98
NOIDA
2,351
1,762
944
1996/97
Gurgaon
1,640
Bengaluru
Chennai
758
1,188
Ahmedabad
Agra
1995/96
45.6
51
112
96
60
65
90
137
110
130
83
87
51
82
2010/11
2,311
5,113
4,377
2,722
2,954
4,100
6,256
5,023
5,932
3,785
3,957
2,327
3,758
2010/11
48.0
45
105
88
54
57
88
87
99
109
76
74
49
71
2011/12*
2,135
5,050
4,232
2,609
2,714
4,220
4,164
4,736
5,212
3,629
3,562
2,347
3,400
2011/12*
54.5
42
90
78
49
45
81
55
74
87
62
62
40
69
2012/13
2,313
4,881
4,236
2,659
2,446
4,418
3,020
4,033
4,750
3,358
3,351
2,189
3,750
2012/13
9.9%
2.3%
0.9%
4.6%
7.4%
6.3%
7.1%
-18.3%
-9.5%
4.7%
2.1%
4.3%
3.7%
-4.6%
-14.9%
-11.8%
-10.2%
-20.6%
-7.8%
-36.1%
-25.0%
-19.7%
-18.5%
-17.2%
-17.9%
-2.9%
1.0%
-2.1%
1.4%
4.1%
3.1%
3.8%
-21.9%
-13.4%
1.5%
-1.0%
1.2%
0.5%
6.6%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
8.3%
-3.3%
0.1%
1.9%
-9.9%
4.7%
-27.5%
-14.9%
-8.9%
-7.5%
-5.9%
-6.7%
10.3%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
City Trends
Agra exhibited the highest increase in
RevPAR (10.3%) amongst the cities tracked
in the survey supported by growth in both
average rate (7.1%) and occupancy (3.0%).
After having witnessed a 21% increase in
supply in 2011/12, the city did not see the
addition of any new branded hotels in
2012/13. It may be noted that the existing
supply tracked for Agra in 2012/13 is lower
than 2011/12 due to the removal of
unbranded hotels from the sample set in
light of adequate branded supply reporting
(Tables 7 and 9).
The commissioning of the Yamuna
Expressway that connects Greater NOIDA to
Agra (in August 2012) reducing the travel
time by half (from four to two plus hours)
has fuelled growth in demand for the city's
hotels. Given the improved connectivity, the
city has seen a significant increase in the
MICE and Individual Leisure Domestic
segments especially from Delhi NCR. Going
forward, HVS believes that Agra will witness
continued growth from these segments
making up for the slow pace of growth
currently being seen in the Foreign Leisure
segment. Furthermore, we are currently
tracking a proposed supply of 866 rooms
over the next few years with approximately
76% under active development. A majority
of the proposed supply (88.5%) is expected
in the mid market and budget space.
Resultantly, we expect pressure on both
occupancies and average rates in the short
term.
However, given the burgeoning middle class
and growth of domestic travellers in the
country, HVS believes that the development
of mid market and budget hotels bodes well
for the Agra hotel market. Moreover, the
re c e n t c l e a ra n c e re c e ive d fo r t h e
construction of a new terminal for civilian
operations at Agra airport is expected to
enhance the connectivity and boost tourism
for the city.
Similar to last year, Ahmedabad continues
to feature among the cities that witnessed
one of the most aggressive increases in
supply in 2012/13. On the heels of an 11%
increase in supply in 2011/12, the city added
an additional 25% inventory in 2012/13.
Consequently, there was a 5.4% drop in
occupancy this year over 2011/12. What is
more noteworthy, however, is the pace of
demand increase during this period, which
grew by approximately 22% in 2011/12
over 2010/11, followed by a 19% increase in
2012/13 over 2011/12. Large-scale events
like Vibrant Gujarat and DERMACON have
significantly boosted MICE demand in the
city; several large weddings during the year
also resulted in many city sold-out dates.
With continuing commercial development
along SG Highway and Prahaladnagar (now
considered an alternative CBD), Commercial
demand at hotels located in the area
witnessed year-on-year growth.
Additionally, small-to-medium sized
businesses located in various pockets of the
city continue to flourish and augment room
Knight Frank Investment Advisory Report 2013 'India's Top Business Districts To Invest In'
Future Trends
Opportunities
About HVS
HVS is the world's leading consulting and services organisation focused on the hotel,
restaurant, shared ownership, gaming, and leisure industries. Established in 1980,
the company performs more than 2,500 assignments per year for virtually every
major industry participant. HVS principals are regarded as the leading professionals
in their respective regions of the globe. Through a worldwide network of 34 offices
staffed by 450 seasoned industry professionals, HVS provides an unparalleled range
of complementary services for the hospitality industry. For further information
regarding our expertise and specifics about our services, please visit www.hvs.com.
Kaushik Vardharajan is
Managing Director HVS
Hospitality Services South
Asia. He joined HVS' New
York office in 2001 and
moved to the New Delhi
office in 2008 and soon
became a partner at the Indian operations
of HVS. Kaushik has worked on over 1,500
market studies, feasibility analyses, and
valuations in North America and India,
with a special focus on large mixed-use
projects and portfolio valuations. Kaushik
is also a Member of the Royal Institute of
Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and is part of
the Valuation Working Committee of RICS,
which is responsible for establishing
professional standards for property
valuations in India. He has also taught
courses and spoken at New York
University, Johnson & Wales University,
and the Indian School of Business.
www.hvs.com
HVS 6th Floor, Building 8-C, DLF Cyber City, Phase - II, Gurgaon 122 002, INDIA