WHITE PAPER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ............................................................................................... 1
Building an Integrated Risk Infrastructure ............................................ 2
Key Requirements .............................................................................. 2
Key Components ................................................................................. 3
Data Management ........................................................................... 3
A Powerful Risk Engine ................................................................... 4
Independent and Transparent Valuations ........................................ 5
Reporting and Workflow Configuration ........................................... 6
Introduction
Risk management today is top of mind for banking professionals around the
world, and it has begun to revolutionize the way banks operate. No longer is
risk management the sole responsibility of the chief risk officer or a banks risk
department; its responsibility now resides with vice presidents, associates,
directors and managing directors across various business units.
Banks have felt the pressure more than other financial institutions to improve
their risk management practices to avoid a repeat of the credit crisis. The need
for improved risk management is not only being driven by regulators, but by
internal and external stakeholders: investors, boards of directors and, in some
cases, governments. Compliance aside, implementing effective risk policies
that are designed to continuously manage a firms risk-and-return profile and
capital are required for the long-term success of a bank.
The recent distress in financial markets has placed greater emphasis on a
financial institutions ability to demonstrate a comprehensive approach to
viewing firmwide exposures and risk. A number of published papers1 point
to the deficiencies of many financial institutions risk management practices
and the concrete actions that need to be taken. The Institute of International
Finance report stated that a firms risk management approach should not rely
on a single risk methodology, but instead take a comprehensive approach,
integrating strands such as credit, market, operational, liquidity and reputational risks. Rating agencies are increasingly focusing on the quality of a firms
enterprise risk management practices in their rating processes. For example, in
2008, Standard & Poors announced that it will review the quality of enterprise
risk management as a new component in its reviews of credit ratings.
An additional area of focus for banks is the need to provide transparency in the
derivatives transactions and valuations that are being delivered. This change
requires banks to step away from their closed, black-box systems and move
toward third-party solutions offered by vendors especially those that include
comprehensive documentation of the models and methodologies used.
Financial models developed in-house no longer provide the required level of
transparency and independence needed to meet all stakeholder and regulatory
requirements. In a 2009 report, the analyst firm Celent stated that disclosure
and pricing or valuation methodologies were key starting points for restoring
confidence in the derivatives and structured finance markets.
Banks are now taking a closer look at how they price and value derivatives. They
are seeking better ways of assessing and measuring risk across the enterprise.
And more importantly, they are seeking ways to integrate the valuations of their
large and often disparate derivatives portfolios with an enterprise risk system
that can handle large volumes of data. To save time and money from in-house
development, banks look to best-of-breed, third-party solutions that can be
easily integrated, while providing the capabilities they need.
Full disclosure of the data, models, analytics and risk measures used.
Assurance knowing they are working with proven and accepted solutions
from two vendors that are leaders in their respective fields.
Key Requirements
The challenges faced by financial institutions demand these key requirements:
The ability to measure exposures and risks across all risk types and books
of business for better control.
The ability to distribute incentives for consistent optimization of riskadjusted returns throughout the organization.
The integrated SAS solution, SAS Risk Management for Banking, covers the
four main risk areas:
Market risk.
Credit risk.
Firmwide risk.
The applications are based on a common data model with predefined extraction,
transformation and loading (ETL), risk analytics and risk reporting. The integrated
risk applications in SAS Risk Management for Banking enable users to get up
and running quickly, while the open infrastructure of the solution allows users to
support not only current business requirements, but also future requirements on
data and risk analytics.
Key Components
The key components for building an integrated risk infrastructure include:
Data management.
Data Management
Regulators have pointed to incomplete, inconsistent and unreliable data as
contributing to the financial crisis, and continuing inadequacies in this area are
a major obstacle to more robust and efficient markets. Disparate data sources
form an often overwhelming hurdle for anyone involved in the implementation of
an ERM solution. Analyst firm TowerGroup3 stated that more than 50 percent
of the effort in implementing an enterprisewide risk management system is
feeding data.
Challenges include everything from the sheer number of sources to ensuring
the integrity of the staged data. The process of systematically organizing
information to support an enterprise risk initiative is fundamental to ensuring
good risk management practices. A well-designed approach to managing
risk information is a critical component of a best-practice risk management
program. However, high-quality risk information management programs continue
to elude many organizations, and inferior information quality adversely affects
risk management. It is important for organizations to understand not only how
to assess the integrity of their risk data but also to know how to address this
problem in a cost-efficient manner. Analysis of risk data availability and integrity
needs to be addressed in a continuous, structured, methodical way, with
measurements in place to feed analytics just like any other operational risk.
Profile, monitor and actively manage the quality of enterprise risk data:
oo
oo
Integrate and standardize risk data from multiple systems and business
units into a unified, accurate view:
oo
oo
Adopt consistent data quality business rules across risk and other
data sources and platforms.
oo
oo
Instrument Range
Interest Rates
Foreign Exchange
Credit
Fixed Income
Equity
Commodity
Mortgage-Backed Securities
Volatility
To support the hundreds of instrument types a bank may have in its portfolio,
both simple and complex models are required. FINCAD Analytics uses a variety
of models including, but not limited to:
Gaussian copula.
FINCAD Analytics is a dynamic derivatives library that keeps pace with the
changing derivatives market. Additional instrument coverage, new models
and new asset classes get added to the library as the market evolves. FINCAD
recently included the ISDA CDS model in its latest release of the analytics library.
To help mitigate systemic risk, financial institutions are moving toward best
practices that incorporate more transparent processes for derivatives valuations.
Black-box solutions are no longer acceptable from a transparency and risk
control perspective. Financial institutions are being asked to disclose all the
facts about their derivatives transactions:
Who are the counterparties involved and what is their level of risk?
reporting requirements. The SAS Risk Reporting Repository allows the bank
to meet both current and future reporting requirements, while exploiting the
power of the SAS Business Analytics Framework.
FINCAD
Phone: +1 604 957 1200
Toll-Free: 1 800 304 0702
(USA/Canada only)
www.fincad.com
The joint solution from SAS and FINCAD is an enterprise risk management
system with independent derivatives valuations. The joint solution has already
been successfully implemented at leading financial institutions, including one
of the top 10 largest banks in the US. If your organization is interested in
learning more about the joint solution, contact a representative from FINCAD
or SAS today.
FinancialCAD and FINCAD are registered trademarks of FinancialCAD Corporation. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks
or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc. in the USA and other countries. indicates USA registration. Other brand and product names are trademarks of their respective companies.
Copyright 2009 FinancialCAD Corp. and SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved.