1990
Printed in Great Britain.
Pergamon
Resaplc
PLATE
M. H. VERWOERDand A. W. M. KOK~
Department of Civil Engineering, Room 5.22, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1,
2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
(Received 17 July 1989)
Abstract-This paper presents the introduction of an isoparametric six-node plate element (SHELL6)
which is free of shear locking. The element has been based upon the Mindlin/Reissner plate bending theory
and is suited for the calculation of thick and thin plates. Some samples are shown to demonstrate the
accuracy of the new element.
INTRODUCTION
For thin plate structures shear locking [l] is a well
known phenomenon. For quadrilateral elements the
reduced integration technique [2-41 is well known in
solving the locking problems.
To model every structure shape some triangles are
usually needed. For the six-node triangle the results
are not satisfactory. Application of reduced integration techniques (the three-point integration rule)
does not improve the results. In particular, the results
of the shear forces are very poor. Consequently, the
six-node bending element is very often neglected in
the finite elements software.
To improve the quality of this element, an alternative solution is found to solve the shear locking of
these elements.
The membrane
and
Constitutive relations
HYPOTHESES
Thick plate and shell elements have been based
upon the hypotheses of Mindlin/Reissner
bending
theory [5-71 and given by:
Rigid pin hypothesis-A
rigid pin, normal to the
midplane, remains a straight pin after deformation.
Plane stress hypothesis-The
normal stress Q,, is
neglected.
Transverse shear strain hypothesis-Transverse
shear strains and stresses are assumed to be constant
about the thickness of the plate.
Following the Mindlin theory the displacements
[u, u, w] at (x, y, z) are formulated as functions of the
midplane (z = 0), translations u, v and w, and
rotations 4, and &, Fig. 1, following:
Drt,
where
(4b)
u =u+z&
v =v-z4,y
a, = Gt,
(1)
where
w =w.
G=-
t To whom correspondence
CAS 36,)_-K
should be addressed.
547
kE
1
2(1 +v) [ 0
548
M. H. VERWOERD
and A. W. M. KOK
Substituting eqns (5b) and (6b) for &, and &,, the
strain energy is discretized for an element, and given
by,
duB;GB,udV.
(8)
s
Fig. 1. Rigid pin and midplane deformation.
or
c, =
B,u
(5b)
and
Y,= 9, + w.,,
(9b)
the
by
the
of
rt=r,+Av,
(loa)
Y: = w,, + 4. + Aw,,
(1W
or
or
L, =
B,u
(6b)
Strain energy
The strain energy of the plate may be written as
the sum of membrane
and transverse
shear
energy.
aE,=
+
sv
aL;.a,dV+
ac:.a,dV.
s
(7)
(11)
549
(12a)
where
Aw., = Aw,,, cos a + 3Aw,, cos* a sin a
+ ~Aw,,,,~cos a sin* a + Aw,, sin a
d.,, = &,XXcos a + (2#5,, - 9,,)
(12b)
cos* a sin a
by,, = Aw,, =
(12c)
(fxya:,
+ iy2a:, - a:P,)&
-(~x2a:X+fxya:Y+~y2a;Y+a:P2)~Y
(15b)
(1%)
+ 2xiyia~Y+y~a~,,)(xi~Y-yi~X)
(14b)
or
Numerical test
A symmetric quadrant of a uniformly loaded,
simply supported, square plate is idealized by 32
elements for a thin plate of span/thickness ratio
L/t = 50. To compare the quality of the refined
SHELL6* element the same quadrant has been idealized by 16 eight-node plate elements (SHELLS) too.
The exact solution for this class of problems is given
in [9].
L=lOrn
t=0.2m
E=lON/m
x
G.lON/m
VSO
550
VERWOERD and
M. H.
-601
A. W. M.
KOK
-+x
[ml
-x
hl
30 -
SHELL6*/SHELLB
-60
SHELL6
-60
i
I
----x [ml
2
-x
[ml
RESULTS
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
CONCLUSIONS
The introduction
of transverse shear strain in
the family of Mindlin element leads to shear
locking problems with decreasing thickness of
triangular and quadrilateral
plate elements. Reduced or selective integration
techniques
can
overcome shear locking for four-node and eightnode elements.
For
triangles,
reduced
integration techniques do not solve the shear locking
problem.
For triangular plate elements shear locking can be
effectively eliminated by the introduction of the correction terms, Aw. These correction terms neutralize
the inhomogeneous
quadratic terms in the shear
strain and successively the shear locking effects, This
new element leads to much more accurate results for
moments and shear forces.
4.
5.
6.
I.
8.
9.
551
APPENDIX
The expression of the shape functions a,@, y) in vector a
are
L,(2L, - 1)
a=
L&L, - 1)
L,(ZL,-1)
0
4
4LI L*
4L, L3
4&L,
whereL,=x;L,=y;L,=l-x-y;O<x<l;O<y<l.
a,,
%v
0
0
-8
0
-8
0
0
4
axY=
4
-4
-4