www.elsevier.com/locate/ijfatigue
a
Nautical School, 2780-572 Paco de Arcos, Portugal
IST-Technical University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1096 Lisbon, Portugal
c
ESTGL, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
Received 19 March 2005; received in revised form 29 May 2005; accepted 8 June 2005
Available online 28 November 2005
Abstract
Most of catastrophic mechanical failures in power rotor shafts occur under cyclic bending combined with steady torsion: Mode I (DKI)
combined with Mode III (KIII). An analysis of the influence of steady torsion loading on fatigue crack growth rates in shafts is presented for short
as well as long cracks. Long cracks growth tests have been carried out on cylindrical specimens in DIN Ck45k steel for two types of testing: rotary
or alternating bending combined with steady torsion in order to simulate real conditions on power rotor shafts. The growth and shape evolution of
semi-elliptical surface cracks, starting from the cylindrical specimen surface, has been measured for several loading conditions and both testing
types. Short crack growth tests have been carried out on specimens of the same material DIN Ck45k, under alternating bending combined with
steady torsion. The short crack growth rates obtained are compared with long crack growth rates. Results have shown a significant reduction of the
crack growth rates when a steady torsion Mode III is superimposed to cyclic Mode I. A 3D Finite Element analysis has also shown that Stress
Intensity Factor values at the corner crack surface depend on the steady torsion value and the direction of the applied torque.
q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Multiaxial fatigue; Short and long crack growth; Rotary and alternating bending; Steady torsion; Cyclic mode I and steady mode III
1. Introduction
Mechanical failures in rotor power shafts generally occur
under cyclic bending, Mode I (DKI), combined with steady
torsion, Mode III (KIII). A large number of power plant systems
present a general steady torsion combined with cyclic bending
stress due to the self-weight bending during the rotation or
possible misalignment between journal bearings. In the case of
rotor shafts (for example, those used in electric power plants,
propeller shafts of screw ships, or any other rotary loadtransmission devices), the lifetime spent between crack
initiation and final fracture is of capital importance to improve
the inspection intervals and maintenance procedures.
Many examples of fatigue crack growth under Mode I
loading have shown that linear elastic fracture mechanics
(LEFM) theory is increasingly being applied to the practical
engineering problems, including material selection, design and
analysis of engineering structures. Fracture mechanics
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: fonte@enautica.pt (M. Fonte), mfreitas@dem.ist.utl.pt
(M. Freitas).
0142-1123/$ - see front matter q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.051
610
Table 1
Chemical composition of Ck45k steel (weight %)
C
Si
Mn
Cr
Ni
Mo
Cu
0.45
0.21
0.56
0.018
0.024
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.10
Ru (MPa)
Rp0.2, monotonic (MPa)
A (%)
E (GPa)
HV
660
410
23
208
195
611
the Irwins elastic energy release rate parameters [24] for the
three loading modes:
2 1=2
DKeq Z Gtotal E1=2 Z DKI2 C DKII2 C 1 C vDKIII
(2)
(1)
DKI Z Y1 Dspa1=2
(3)
DKII Z Y2 Dtpa1=2
(4)
DKIII Z Y3 Dtpa1=2
(5)
and Y1, Y2, Y3 are geometry factors (for Mode I, Mode II and
Mode III, respectively), depending on the crack aspect ratio,
the Poissons ratio, the parametric angle F (Fig. 1) and the
loading conditions.
For short cracks, the mixed-mode models proposed for long
cracks are inappropriate, because the SIF, K, can only be used
when the plastic zone size is small compared to the crack
length and structure dimensions. However, substantial effort
has recently been directed to model the short crack growth
behaviour [1921], where the elasticplastic loading conditions are significant. For elasticplastic loading conditions, a
strain intensity factor, DKI(3), is often used, as is shown in Ref.
[21]. Any equivalent stress intensity factor can be used as a
strain intensity by appropriately replacing the normal stress and
shear stress terms with ED3 and GDg, respectively. This allows
an effective strain intensity factor, DKeq(3), to be written in
terms of the strain amplitudes and crack geometry factors.
In this paper, a model based on the ASME code approach is
proposed by considering the additional hardening and,
correcting the strain range parameter for non-proportional
loading path, an effective strain-based intensity factor range is
given by:
p
DKNP Z E1 C aFNP D3eq pa
(6)
where FNP is the non-proportionality factor for the loading
path, FNP ZRb/Ra, Ra and Rb are the major and minor radius of
the Minimum Circumscribed Ellipse circumscribing the multiaxial loading path, respectively. a is a material constant related
to additional hardening [25], D3eq is the strain range parameter
calculated by the ASME code approach:
1
p D3x KD3y 2 C D3y KD3z 2
D3eq Z
1 C v 2
(7)
1=2
CD3z KD3x 2 C 6 D32xy C D32yz C D32xz
Eq. (6) can be used to correlate the short crack growth rate.
3.2. Fatigue crack growth parameters
The crack geometry parameters in cylindrical specimens are
here characterized according to the Shiratori nomenclature [8],
i.e. the half-length of the arc crack front is denoted by s and the
minor semi-ellipse axis corresponding to the maximum crack
depth is denoted by b, see Fig. 1. The crack depth b against the
612
(8)
KI
K
p Z
Bs ps K0
(10)
Fig. 2. Finite element mesh: (a) normal plane of eight semi-elliptical surface cracks; (b) the whole round bar with the semi-elliptical crack No. 7 at the middle
position.
613
2.5
2.0
d(2s)/dN [mm/cycle]
1.5
1.0
10-4
Mode I
Mode(I+III)
Mode (I+III)
10-5
0.5
10-6
Mode (I+III)
0.0
200000
0.1
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
10
Number of cycles
Fig. 4. Fatigue crack growth in the short crack regime.
Fig. 5. Fatigue crack growth rate vs. arc crack length 2s in Mode (ICIII) for
short cracks and in Mode I and Mode (ICIII) for long cracks.
614
d(2s)/dN [mm/cycle]
ds/dN [m/cycle]
Mode(I+III), Bs=205MPa,Ts=420MPa
FIT Line
1E-8
ds/dN=3x10
-10
( K
-4
10
Mode I
Mode (I+III)
0,93
NPI
-5
10
1E-9
10
20
30
1/2
KNP [MPa m
40
50
deflection means that the local effective stress at the crack tip
(for a remote bending stress of 200 MPa) or the driving force
decrease as fatigue crack propagates. This situation is similar to
that in a shaft with a misalignment between journal bearings.
In rotating bending, due to the fact that fatigue surface crack
continuously rotates during the cyclic loading, the crack can
grow up to final rupture. In alternating or reversed bending
under controlled deflection, the fatigue crack growth rate
decreases and generally stops for the crack depth b equal to
about r, being r the shaft radius.
Experimental results are reported in Fig. 710. Fig. 7 shows
the fatigue crack growth (FCG) for rotary bending and rotary
bending combined with steady torsion, whereas Fig. 8 displays
the FCG rate against the arc crack length 2s. A significant effect
of steady torsion on FCG rate for two levels of torsion, TsZ50
and 100 MPa, is observed. Results show that FCG rate in rotary
bending decreases with the level of steady torsion.
The evolution of the arc crack length (fast and slow) is
shown in Fig. 9 for a specimen (14 mm diameter) under
alternating bending combined with steady torsion (BsZ
200 MPa and TsZ200 MPa). The torsion level clearly shows
Mode (I+III)
14
12
10
8
4
2
Mode I
20
Mode I
Fast growth
Slow growth
Mode I
9.0
16
15
Fig. 8. Fatigue crack growth rate 2s/dN vs. arc crack length 2s in rotary
bending.
20
18
10
Fig. 6. Fatigue crack growth rates vs. DKNP in Mode (ICIII) for short cracks.
8.0
Mode (I+III)
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
50.000
Number of cycles
Fig. 7. Arc crack length 2s vs. number of cycles in rotary bending for long
cracks.
50
100
150
200
250
300
Thousands of cycles
Fig. 9. FCG curves showing the evolution of the arc crack length in alternating
bending combined with torsion.
10 -6
-9
3.2
ds/dN=5.1x10 (KI )
ds/dN [m/cycle]
10 -7
10
Mode I (rotary)
Mode I (alternate)
FIT Mode I (rotary)
Mode (I+III)(altern)
FIT Mode(I+III)
Mode (I+III)(altern)
-8
10 -9
10
15
20
25
30
KI [MPa m1/2]
Fig. 10. Fatigue crack growth rate vs. KI in rotary and alternating bending.
Ts
Bs
(12)
where:
xZ
b
r
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
TB * = B * + T *
K / Ko
0.6
B* C*
0.5
0.4
TC * = C * T *
TC*
0.3
T*
B*-C*
0.2
0.1
TB*
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
615
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
b/r
Fig. 11. Geometric factors FI (KI/Ko) at points B and C, for different semielliptical cracks under Mode I and mixed-mode (ICIII).
616
Fig. 12. Deformed mesh for bending (a), torsion (b) and combined bending and torsion (c) in a round bar and for a given semi-elliptical surface crack.
Fig. 13. SEM morphology of the crack surface due to torsion: (a) factory roof with a pronounced rubbed effect near the notch; (b) factory roof closed to the crack tip.
which decreases the FCG rate [1214]. The SEM fatigue crack
growth morphology shows a factory roof (see Fig. 13(b))
which explains the zig-zag crack path and the effect of friction
between the crack surfaces due to the torsion. The deformed
mesh shown in Fig. 12(b) leads to the friction effect in
Fig. 13(a).
It is also observed that the crack initiation period is
significantly delayed by the steady torsion level when it is
superimposed to Mode I loading. This means that values of Kth
especially increase with increasing KII, and agree with the
conclusions by Tschegg [7]. For long cracks, Tschegg et al. [6]
have also suggested that, during compression phase of fatigue,
the loading close to the crack tip is lower than that close to the
notch root, and that means that, in rotary bending, the R-value
continuously changes with increasing the crack depth. Under
rotary bending conditions, this is valid for point A (Fig. 1 and
Fig. 2(a)), but not for points B and C. These points alternatively
experience the same nominal maximum and minimum values
of the stress bending, since the beginning up to the end of
testing.
Steady Mode III (KIII) cannot contribute alone to fatigue
crack growth but, due to the plane stress effect in presence of
cyclic Mode I (DKI), it does induce a significant plastic zone
size at the crack front, mainly at the interception of crack front
with cylindrical surface (points B and C). This fact seems to be
the major contribution to decreasing of crack growth rates and
even more important than friction or fretting debris. Moreover,
the fatigue crack growth follows a micrograph twisted line
Acknowledgements
Financial supports from the Fundacao para a Ciencia e
Tecnologia (FCT) is acknowledged.
References
[1] Hourlier F, McLean D, Pineau A. Fatigue crack growth behaviour of
Ti5Al2.5Sn alloy under complex stress (mode ICsteady mode III). Met
Technol 1978;1548.
[2] Akhurst KN, Lindley TC, Nix KJ. The effect of mode III loading on
fatigue crack growth in a rotating shaft. Fatigue Eng Struct 1983;6:3456.
[3] Pook LP. Comments on fatigue crack growth under mixed modes I and III
and pure mode III loading. In: Miller KJ, Brown MW, editors. Multiaxial
fatigue. ASTM STP 853; 1985. p. 259.
[4] Yates JR, Miller KJ. A torsion-bending loading frame for use with a
uniaxial test machine. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1988;11:32130.
[5] Yates JR, Miller KJ. Mixed mode (ICIII) fatigue thresholds in a forging
steel. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1989;12:25970.
[6] Tschegg EK, Stanzl S, Mayer H, Czegley M. Crack face interactions near
threshold fatigue crack growth. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1983;16:
7183.
[7] Tschegg EK. Mode III and mode I fatigue crack propagation behaviour
under torsional loading. J Mater Sci 1983;18:160414.
[8] Shiratori M, Miyoshi T, Sakay Y, Zhang GR. Factors analysis and
application of influence coefficients for round bar with a semi-elliptical
surface crack. In: Murakami Y, editor. Handbook of stress intensity
factors, II. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1987. p. 65965.
[9] Carpinteri A. Elliptical-arc surface cracks in round bars. Fatigue Fract
Eng Mater Struct 1992;15:1141.
[10] Carpinteri A. Shape change of surface cracks in round bars under cyclic
axial loading. Int J Fatigue 1993;15:216.
[11] Freitas MM, Francois D. Analysis of fatigue crack growth in rotary bend
specimens and railway axles. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1995;18:
1718.
[12] Fonte MA, Freitas MM. Semi-elliptical crack growth under rotating or
reversed bending combined with steady torsion. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater
Struct 1997;20:895906.
[13] Fonte MA, Freitas MM. Stress intensity factors for semi-elliptical surface
cracks in round bars under bending and torsion. Int J Fatigue 1999;21:
45763.
[14] Fonte MA, Freitas MM. Stress intensity factors for two critical angular
positions of semi-elliptical surface cracks is shafts. In: Selvadurai APS,
Brebbia CA, editors. Damage and fracture mechanics VIcomputer
aided assessement and control, 2000. p. 491500.
617
[15] Miller K. The short crack problem. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1982;
3:22332.
[16] Socie D, Marquis G. Multiaxial fatigue. Warrendale, PA: Soc Aut
Engineers; 2000.
[17] Newman JC, Edwards PR. Short crack behaviour in aluminum alloyan
AGARD Cooperative Test Programme, AGARD Report 732; 1988.
[18] Carvalho MH, Freitas MM. Short crack behaviour in aluminium alloy
2090, AGARD Report 767; 1990. p. 3.13.17.
[19] Park J, Nelson D, Rostami A. Small crack growth in combined bendingtorsion fatigue of A533B steel. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2001;24:
17991.
[20] McDowell DL, Bennett VP. A microcrack growth law for multiaxial
fatigue. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1996;19(7):82137.
[21] Reddy SC, Fatemi A. Small crack growth in multiaxial fatigue. In:
Mitchell MR, Landgraf RW, editors. Advances in fatigue lifetime
predictive techniques. Philadelphia: ASTM; 1992. p. 27698.
[22] Freitas M, Reis L, Li B. Multiaxial mixed mode cracking and small
crack initiation and propagation. In: Seventh ICBMFF, Berlin; 2004.
p. 97108.
[23] Hua CT. Fatigue damage and small crack growth during biaxial loading.
PhD Thesis. Dept. of Mech and Industry Enggng, University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign; 1984.
[24] Irwin GR. Fracture mechanics applied to adhesive systems. In: Patrik RL,
editor. Treatise on adhesion and adhesives, vol. 1. New York: Marcel
Dekker; 1967. p. 23367.
[25] Reis L, Li B, Freitas M. Biaxial fatigue for proportional and nonproportional loading paths. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2004;27:
77584.
[26] Raju IS, Newman JC. Stress intensity factors for circumferential surface
cracks in pipes and rods under tension and bending loads. Fract Mech
1986;17:789805 [ASTM STP 905].
[27] Murakami Y, Tsuru H. Stress-intensity factor equations for semi-elliptical
surface crack in a shaft under bending. In: Murakami Y, editor. Stress
intensity factors handbook, vol. II. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1987. p.
6578.
[28] Carpinteri A. Propagation of surface cracks under cyclic loading. In:
Carpinteri A, editor. Handbook of fatigue crack propagation in metallic
structures. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1996. p. 653705 [chapter 18].
[29] Carpinteri A, Brighenti R. Fatigue propagation of surface flaws in round
bars: a three-parameter theoretetical model. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater
Struct 1996;19:47180.
[30] Pook LP. A finite element analysis of the angle crack specimen. In:
Rossmanith HP, Miller HJ, editors. Mixed-mode fatigue and fracture,
ESIS 14. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications; 1993. p.
285302.