Seismic
S
i
i H
Hazards
d iin S
Sunda
d
Trench after the IOT 2004
Danny Hilman Natawidjaja
MENTAWAI BACKTHRUST
TOPICS
Seismic and Tsunami Hazards-Risks
Hazards Risks in
Sunda Trench after IOT 2014
Scientific Knowledges of dissasters
shall lead dissaster risk reduction (DRR)
practices
Handling uncertainty in earthquake
prediction
di ti
and
dh
how t
to apply
l th
them in
i DRR
practices
Sumatran case is one of the best
example for applying sciences to DRR
practices
KALIMANTAN
SOUTH-EAST ASIA
Andaman
Spreading
Center
MALAYSIA
SUMATRA
Sumatran Fault
Back Thrust
Subduction Zone
50 mm/yr
Megathrust
60 mm/yr
70 mm/yr
HINDIA OCEAN
2009 EQ: INTRACRUSTAL FAULT
KALIMANTAN
SOUTH-EAST ASIA
MALAYSIA
MALAYSIA
SUMATRA
1799
((8.7))
1833
(8 9)
(8.9)
Ref:
1. Newcomb and McCann, 1987
2. Natawidjaja et al, 2006
Chlieh, 2008
NO MEGATHRUST EVENT
IN HISTORICAL RECORD
NO PALEOSEISMIC DATA
HINDIA OCEAN
HINDIA OCEAN
MEGATHRUST SEGMENTATION
EARTHQUAKE CYCLES
Meltzner, 2012
200
07
179
97&
183
33
160
00s
200
04
1450
ACEH
200
05
186
61
NIAS
MENTAWAI
BATU
BATU
BATU
Natawidjaja
j j et al 2004
1935
1907 1861
(7.7) (8.5)
1800
1881
(7 9)
(7.9)
SUMATRA
130
00s
1941
(7.7)
KALIMANTAN
SOUTH-EAST ASIA
SUNDA:
NO MEGATHRUST
EVENT FOR
HUNDREDS YEARS
5-Year Interval
EARTHQUAKE CYCLES
2007
1797&
1833
1300s
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
200
05
186
61
2004
145
50
1600s
Meltzner 2012
Meltzner,
Magnitude
ACEH
NIAS
MENTAWAI
BATU
1935
1800
BATU
SUNDA:
NO MEGATHRUST
EVENT FOR
HUNDREDS YEARS
Natawidjaja
j j et al 2004
5-Year Interval
Magnitude
5-Year Interval
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
5-Year Interval
5-Year Interval
Magnitude
5-Year Interval
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
Magnitude
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
Complex faulting
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
Complex faulting
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
2002
(7.2)
Magnitude
Annual Seismicity
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2002
(7.2)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
Magnitude
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
Annual Seismicity
2004
(9.2)
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2004
(9.2)
2002
(7.2)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
2005
(8.7)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
2002
(7.2)
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
2004
(9.2)
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2002
(7.2)
Annual Seismicity
Annual Seismicity
2005
(8.7)
Magnitude
Annual Seismicity
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2004
(9.2)
2002
(7.2)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
2005
(8.7)
2007
(8 4 & 7
(8.4
7.9
9&7
7.0)
0)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
Annual Seismicity
Magnitude
Annual Seismicity
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2008
(7.5)
2008
(7.5)
2009
(7 7)
(7.7)
2004
(9.2)
2002
(7.2)
2005
(8.7)
2004
(9.2)
2007
(8 4 & 7
(8.4
7.9
9&7
7.0)
0)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
Annual Seismicity
2002
(7.2)
Magnitude
Annual Seismicity
(7.7)
2005
(8.7)
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2010
2008
(7.5)
2009
(7.7)
2009
(7 7)
(7.7)
2004
(9.2)
2010
(7 8)
(7.8)
2007
(8.4 & 7.9 & 7.0)
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
(7 7)
(7.7)
2002
(7.2)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
2010
2004
(9.2)
2007
(8 4 & 7
(8.4
7.9
9&7
7.0)
0)
2008
(7.5)
2005
(8.7)
2002
(7.2)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
2005
(8.7)
2010
(7 8)
(7.8)
2007
(8.4 & 7.9 & 7.0)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
Annual Seismicity
Magnitude
Annual Seismicity
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2010
2008
(7.5)
(7.7)
2010
2008
(7.5)
2009
(7.7)
(7 7)
(7.7)
2004
(9.2)
2002
(7.2)
2012
2005
(8.7)
2009
(7 7)
(7.7)
2004
(9.2)
2010
(7 8)
(7.8)
2007
(8.4 & 7.9 & 7.0)
Magnitude
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
2002
(7.2)
2005
(8.7)
2012
(8.x & 8.y)
2010
(7 8)
(7.8)
2007
(8.4 & 7.9 & 7.0)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
FUTURE EARTHQUAKES
Magnitude
4 0 6.0
4.0
60
2004
2007
2000
6.1 7.0
7.1 7.5
7 6 8.0
7.6
80
8.0 9.2
2012
2010
2013
2010
2008
(7.5)
1970
(7.7)
2009
(7 7)
(7.7)
2004
(9.2)
2012
(8.x & 8.y)
M8
M7.7
M7
7
2005
(8.7)
2002
(7.2)
M9?
M8 8
M8.8
2010
(7 8)
(7.8)
2007
(8.4 & 7.9 & 7.0)
2000
(7.8 & 7.0)
LEWAK
cGPS
SuGAR
UJUNG
SANGGIRAN
LHOK
PAUH
LHOK DALAM
UJUNG SALANG
Lhok Pauh
1390
Lhok Pauh
1440
1390
1420
1440
TRENCHINGPALEOTSUNAMIATLAMREH
Gempa
p 1861
Gempa 1907
Marcopolo
PARA WALI
PALEOTSUNAMI1450M
PORTUGIS
Ibnu
Batuta
NAD
RI
KOLONIAL
SAMUDRA
PASAI
KESULTANAN
ACEH
PALEOTSUNAMI1390M
MAR 2005 Mw 8
8.7)
7)
WHAT WE
KNOWS ?
A 2009 (M
Aug
(Mw 7
7.10)
10)
Mw 8.8
88
OCTOBER
2010 (Mw 7.7)
REMAINING
SLIP AFTER
OCT. 2010
PECAH
SEKALIGUS
ATAU TIDAK?
WHAT WE
DONT:
O
KAPAN?
Mw 8.8
88
ADA SLIP
ATAU TIDAK?
OCTOBER
2010 (Mw 7.7)
WHAT WE
KNOWS ?
TSUNAMI
EARTHQUAKE
September 2010
(Mw 7.7)
Modelling sumber
tsunami dari data
SuGAR (GPS
Kontinyu dan data
tinggi tsunami di
lapangan (Emma
Hill dkk 2011)
WHAT WE
KNOWS ?
Lampung
Krakatau
Jakarta
T
Tr.
f
fore-arc
b i
basin
Cimandiri-Lembang Fault
Baribis
Fault
Semarang
fault
M 8.0
Kendeng
K
d
Quaternary
Q t
Fold belt zone
Opak fault
M 9.0
90
M 7.8
M 7.5
ConcludingRemarks
g
SundatrenchMegathrusthasbeenveryactivesince
theIOT2004
Manymajorearthquakeshasoccuredincludingthe
2005 NiasSimelue
2005Nias
Simelueevent(Mw8.7),2006
event (Mw8.7), 2006
PangandaranTsunamiearthquake(Mw7.8),2007
Bengkulu tripplets (Mw8.4, 7.9, 7.0) 2010 Mentawai
Bengkulutripplets(Mw8.4,7.9,7.0)2010Mentawai
tsunamiearthquake(Mw7.8)
StillsomeSEISMICGAPSremainingtobethenext
Still some SEISMIC GAPS remaining to be the next
majorearthquaketsunamieventsincludingthewell
defined Mentawai megathrust
definedMentawaimegathrust.
Indepthresearchcanlessensomeuncertaintiesin
earthq ake predictions b t al a s not all We al a s
earthquakepredictionsbutalwaysnotall.Wealways
facelackofdataandfaultcomplexity