This paper was selected for presentation by the JFES program committee
following the review of abstract submitted by author(s).
ABSTRACT
Cementation factor (cementation exponent) is one of the
most important parameters in saturation equation to
determine the water or hydrocarbon saturations. It acts as
a power of porosity in the most of saturation equations
which increases the importance of this parameter. The
best cementation factor data is based on laboratory
measurements and log interpretation results, but
sometimes it is considered as a constant value in oil and
gas reservoirs which causes large errors in saturation
calculations. Using a constant value for cementation
factor in saturation equations may cause large errors and
uncertainties in hydrocarbon saturation determination
because it is dependent to porosity value, type of porosity
and pore types, pressure and lithology. Correlations are
the best alternatives when there are not sufficient
laboratory measurements or accurate log interpretation
values.
The effect of cementation factor on saturation was
investigated. It was shown that cementation factor has
almost the same values in porosities more than 5 percent
but there are completely different values in porosities less
than 5 percent. Investigation of pressure, porosity and
lithology effects on cementation factor from the
laboratory measurements and log interpretation in Iranian
carbonate reservoirs was resulted in a new correlation for
Sarvak, Kangan and Dalan formations. In the new
correlation, cementation factor was plotted versus
porosity to compare with the most famous existing
correlations like Shell and Borai. The most common
correlation which is being used in Iranian reservoirs is
Shell formula whereas it has completely different trend
compared to the new correlation in low porosities. Also a
couple of Monte Carlo simulations were used to
INTRODUCTION
Before 1942, core samples using oil base mud were the
only sources to measure the saturations in the reservoir
intervals. The method was difficult and expensive, so
there were a few points of measurements. In 1942,
Archie established a relationship between porosity, water
resistivity, formation resistivity and water saturation in
clean formations. Archie's method was easy and quite
cheaper than the previous methods. Also this method had
the ability of continuous determinations of saturation
through whole reservoir interval because he used log data
for the saturation equation calculations. The equation is
as follows:
S wn F
Rw
... (1)
Rt
-1-
Rw
(4)
Rt
-2-
CORRELATION
In cases including lack of laboratory measurements,
correlations from the same type of reservoirs, are the best
solutions to estimate the unknown parameters. Since
there is no correlation for cementation factor in Iranian
hydrocarbon reservoirs, it has been tried to find an
appropriate one based on available data from core and
log data. The log cementation factors has been calculated
using back calculation method in aquifer zones, S w =1, of
this reservoir by considering n=2.0. The calculated
cementation factors, by this method, had a good
consistency with core lab data. Then the effect of
different parameters on cementation factor has been
investigated to find an appropriate relation between
cementation factor and other available reservoir
parameters such as pore type, confining pressure,
reservoir temperature, lithology and porosity. Based on
geological reports, pore types did not have any effect on
cementation factor in this carbonate reservoir.
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS
-3-
m 1.87
0.042
0.035
.... (7)
1.0
........ (5)
0.36 0.08 ln
m 2.2
0.19
..... (6)
-4-
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
-5-
-6-
FIGURES
Well 1
0.8
Sw
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Sw / Z1
Sw / Z2
Sw / Z3
Sw / Z4
Sw / Z5
Zone 1-8
Sw / Z6
Sw / Z7
=Mean,+1/-1SD
Sw / Z8
=+95%,-5%
Sw
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Sw / Z1
Sw / Z2
Sw / Z3
Sw / Z4
Sw / Z5
Zone 1-8
Sw / Z6
Sw / Z7
=Mean,+1/-1SD
Sw / Z8
=+95%,-5%
Sw
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Sw / Z1
Sw / Z2
Sw / Z3
Sw / Z4
Zone 1-8
Sw / Z5
Sw / Z6
Sw / Z7
=Mean,+1/-1SD
-7-
Sw / Z8
=+95%,-5%
DT cross-plot
2.5
Cementation Factor
2.25
2
1.75
1.5
1.25
Forced Fit
Free Fit
1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Pressure
-8-
0.6
Sw
Sw
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
Sw / Z1
Sw / Z2
Sw / Z3
Sw / Z4
Sw / Z5
Zones 1-8
Sw / Z6
Sw / Z7
=Mean,+1/-1SD
Sw / Z8
=+95%,-5%
Sw
0.6
0.4
0.2
Sw / Z3
Sw / Z4
Zones 1-8
Sw / Z5
Sw / Z6
=Mean,+1/-1SD
Sw / Z7
Sw / Z3
Sw / Z4
Sw / Z5
Sw / Z6
=Mean,+1/-1SD
Sw / Z7
Sw / Z8
=+95%,-5%
0.8
Sw / Z2
Sw / Z2
Zones 1-8
0.0
Sw / Z1
0.0
Sw / Z1
Sw / Z8
=+95%,-5%
-9-