API578 - My Self Study Notes

Material Verification Program for New
and Existing Alloy Piping Systems

API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 578
2013- My exam preparation Notes
-,
Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang
API578
Contents
1 Scope
2 Normative References
3 Definitions
4 Extent of Verification
4.1 General
4.2 New Construction Quality Assurance (QA) Material Verification
Program
4.3 Material Verification Program for Existing Piping Systems
4.4 Material Verification Program as an Element of Maintenance
Systems
5. Material Verification Program Test Methods
5.1 Material Verification Program Test Method Objectives
5.2 PMI Test Methods
5.3 Equipment Calibration
5.4 Equipment Precision
5.5 Personnel Qualifications
5.6 Safety Issues
Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong
API578
6 Evaluation of PMI Test Results

6.1 Material Acceptance Methods 6.2 Dissimilar Metal Welds and Weld
Overlays
6.3 Follow-up PMI Testing after Discovery of a Nonconformity
7 Marking and Recordkeeping
7.1 Materials Identification Process
7.2 Material Certifications
7.3 Shop and Field PMI Test Documentation
7.4 New and Existing Piping System Documentation
7.5 PMI Test Records
7.6 PMI Test Procedures
7.7 Traceability to Field Components
API578
There will be about 5 questions from this document on the API 570 exam
API578
API578
1 Scope
API578
1 Scope
The purpose of this recommended practice (RP) is to provide the guidelines for a
material and quality assurance system to verify that the nominal composition of
alloy components within the pressure envelope of a piping system is consistent
with the selected or specified construction materials to minimize the potential for
catastrophic release of toxic or hazardous liquids or vapors. This RP provides the
guidelines for material control and material verification programs on ferrous and
nonferrous alloys during the construction, installation, maintenance, and inspection of
new and existing process piping systems covered by the ASME B31.3 and API 570
piping codes. This RP applies to metallic alloy materials purchased for use either
directly by the owner/user or indirectly through vendors, fabricators, or contractors and
includes the supply, fabrication, and erection of these materials. Carbon steel
components specified in new or existing piping systems are not specifically
covered under the scope of this document unless minor/trace alloying elements
are critical to component corrosion resistance or similar degradation.
API578
Key Words:
The purpose of this recommended practice (RP) is to provide the guidelines for a
material and quality assurance system to verify that the nominal composition of
alloy components within the pressure envelope of a piping system is consistent
with the selected or specified construction materials to minimize the potential for
catastrophic release of toxic or hazardous liquids or vapors.
RP578
,
, , , .
API578
API578 RP ,,
, .
API578
API578
Key Words:
Alloy components within the pressure envelope

/
API578
Key Words:
RP On ferrous and nonferrous alloys during the construction,

installation, maintenance, and inspection of new and existing
process piping systems covered by the ASME B31.3 and API
570
ASME B31.3API 570
API578
Key Words:
Carbon steel components specified in new or existing piping

systems are not specifically covered under the scope of this
document unless minor/trace alloying elements are critical to
component corrosion resistance or similar degradation.
-/
.
API578
API578 Applicable: construction,

installation, maintenance, and
inspection of new and existing
process piping systems covered
by the ASME B31.3 and API 570
piping codes
API578
This RP provides
the guidelines for
material control and
material verification
programs on ferrous
and nonferrous
alloys
Carbon steel components specified in new or existing piping systems are

not specifically covered under the scope of this document unless
minor/trace alloying elements are critical to component corrosion resistance
or similar degradation.
API578
API578
API578 Section 1:
ASME B31.3 API 570

-/
.
API578
API578
API 570, Piping Inspection Code: Inspection, Repair, and Rerating of In-service Piping Systems
API Publ 581, Risk-Based InspectionBase Resource Document
API RP 571, Damage Mechanisms Affecting Fixed Equipment In the Refining Industry
API RP 939-C, Guidelines for Avoiding Sulfidation Corrosion Failures in Oil Refineries
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code: Section II, Material Specifications Part A, Ferrous
Materials Part B, Nonferrous Materials Part C, Welding Rods, Electrodes, and Filler Metals
ASME B31.3, Process Piping
CSB Chemical Safety Board Bulletin 2005-04-B, Positive Material Verification: Prevent Errors
During Alloy Steel Systems Maintenance
NACE Paper No 03651, Specification for Carbon Steel Materials for Hydrofluoric Acid
Alkylation Units
PFI ES22, Recommended Practice for Color Coding of Piping Materials
3 Definitions
API578
3.1
alloy material
Any metallic material (including welding filler materials) that contain alloying elements
that are intentionally added to enhance mechanical or physical properties and corrosion
resistance, or a combination thereof (e.g. Chromium, Nickel, or Molybdenum).
3.2
distributor
A warehousing supplier for one or more manufacturers or suppliers of alloy materials or
components.
API578
3.3
fabricator
One who fabricates piping systems or portions of a piping system as defined by ASME
B31.3.
3.4
inspection lot
A group of items or materials of the same type from a common source from which a
sample is to be drawn for examination.
NOTE An inspection lot does not include items from more than one heat.
API578
3.5
level of examination
The specified percentage of the number of components (or weldments when specified)
to be examined in an inspection lot.
3.6
lot size
The number of items available in the inspection lot at the time a representative sample
is selected.
3.7
material manufacturer
An organization that performs or supervises and directly controls one or more of the
operations that affect the chemical composition or mechanical properties of a metallic
material.
3.8
material nonconformance
A positive material identification (PMI) test result that is not consistent with the selected
or specified alloy.
API578
3.9
material supplier
An organization that supplies material furnished and certified by a material
manufacturer, but does not perform any operation intended to alter the material
properties required by the applicable material specification.
3.10
material verification program
A documented quality assurance procedure used to assess metallic alloy materials
(including weldments and attachments where specified) to verify conformance with
the selected or specified alloy material designated by the owner/user.
NOTE This program may include a description of methods for alloy material testing,
physical component marking, and program
record-keeping.
API578
3.11
mill test report
A certified document that permits each component to be identified according to the
original heat of material from which it was produced and identifies the applicable
material specification (including documentation of all test results required by the
material specification).
3.12
owner/user
An owner or user of piping systems who exercises control over the operation,
engineering, inspection, repair, alteration, testing, and rerating of those piping
systems.
3.13
positive material identification (PMI) testing
Any physical evaluation or test of a material to confirm that the material which has
been or will be placed into service is consistent with the selected or specified alloy
material designated by the owner/user. These evaluations or tests may provide
either qualitative or quantitative information that is sufficient to verify the nominal
alloy composition.
API578
3.14
pressure-containing components
Items that form the pressure-containing envelope of the piping system.
3.15
random
Selection process by which choices are made in an arbitrary and unbiased manner.
3.16
representative sample
One or more items selected at random from the inspection lot that are to be examined to
determine acceptability of the inspection lot.
3.17
standard reference materials
Sample materials for which laboratory chemical analysis data are available and are used
in demonstrating test instrument accuracy and reliability.
API578
API578
4.1 General
The owner/user should establish a written material verification program indicating
the extent and type of PMI testing to be conducted during the construction of new
piping systems, retroactively on existing piping systems, and during the
maintenance, repair, or alteration of existing piping systems.
For higher-risk systems, the owner/user should consider the need for employing a
higher percentage of examination (up to 100 %) rather than random sampling
which may be more appropriate for lower-risk systems. Inadvertent material
substitution problems tend to be sporadic; therefore, small sample sizes may not
locate all inadvertent alloy substitutions. The owner/user should also consider the
need to conduct examinations after fabrication is complete, to ensure that
incorrect substitutions did not occur at the work site.
API578
4.1 General
Owner/User
, , ,
, /.
(%)/
,
.
API578
4.1.1 Alloy Substitutions in Carbon Steel Systems

When determining the need to perform material verification on carbon steel
systems, the owner/user should evaluate the effect that the process stream could
have on substituted alloy materials. In some cases, the substitution of
hardenable alloy materials in carbon steel piping systems resulted in failure and
loss of containment. Examples of such systems include wet hydrogen sulfide (H2S),
hydrofluoric acid (HF), and sulfuric acid (H2S04) services.
PMI , /
API578
4.2 New Construction Quality Assurance (QA) Material Verification

Program PMI
RP-/
This section covers alloy piping during fabrication either in the shop or in the
field prior to the items being placed into service and is restricted to the
pressure-containing boundaries.
RP
API578
4.2.1 Roles and Responsibilities

A material verification program for piping systems may involve participation of
several groups within the operating plant or the shop of a contractor, vendor, or
fabricator. When establishing a material verification program, consideration should
be given to the roles and responsibilities that each group has within the specific
organization. These roles and responsibilities should be clearly defined and
documented. Within the operating plant, this can include those groups responsible
for purchasing, engineering, warehousing /receiving, operations, reliability,
maintenance, and inspection. It is the responsibility of the owner/user or designee to
determine the extent of examination required and to verify that the implementation
and conduct of the material verification program is properly performed in accordance
with this RP. It is also the responsibility of the owner/user to verify that the alloy
materials subsequently placed into service are as specified, and that the
documentation of the material verification program is in accordance with this RP.
PMIRP
-/
API578
,
;
, ,
PMI
API578
API578
4.2.2 Material Verification Test Procedure Review

When PMI testing is performed by the material supplier or third-party agency, the
owner/user or designee should review and approve the adequacy of the material
verification program and testing procedure of the fabricator or
material supplier prior to testing.
4.2.3 Scheduling of Material Verification Testing
PMI testing should be performed at the point in time that ensures that proper alloy
materials have been used in the fabrication of an identifiable assembly.
PMI, /
RP
PMI.
API578
4.2.4 Mill Test Report

Mill test reports should not be considered a substitute for a PMI test.
However, mill test reports are an important part of an overall material
quality assurance program.
PMI.
API578
4.2.5 Components Covered in a Material Verification Program

Examples of pressure-containing components that make up fabricated piping
systems that are covered by this RP include:
a) pipe lengths;
b) pipe fittings, such as tees, elbows, reducers, special pipe components, blinds and
plugs;
c) flanges;
d) special forgings;
e) process valves (including control valves) and relief valves;
f) pressure-containing welds;
g) instruments (all pressure containing parts);
h) weld overlays or cladding;
i) bolting;
j) expansion joints and bellows;
k) gaskets.
API578
4.2.6 PMI Testing of Welding Consumables

When welding is conducted, one electrode or wire sample from each lot or
package of alloy weld rod should be positively identified. The remainder of the
lot should be compared to the sample to verify that the markings of the
wires/electrodes are correct. Some weld rods have the alloying elements
contained in the flux, and do not meet the alloy specification until welded. PMI
testing of weld metal (e.g. deposited weld metal or undiluted weld buttons) is
a permissible alternative to PMI testing of an electrode or wire sample provided
it is conducted immediately prior to welding or during the welding process.
, PMI
.
,(
)PMI (2013 June)
API578
API578
4.2.6.1 Longitudinal Pipe and Fitting Welds

Where there is reason to suspect problems, longitudinally welded alloy pipe and
fittings should receive random PMI testing verification of the base metal and weld
metal.
4.2.6.2 Autogenous Welds
If the owner/user determines that material verification testing is required on
autogenous-welded (with no added filler metal) alloy pipe or fittings, it is necessary to
conduct testing on only the base metal.
4.2.7 PMI Testing of Components Supplied by a Distributor
A higher degree of PMI testing verification should be conducted on alloy material
supplied by stocking distributors due to the potential for material mix-ups as a result
of handling.
Longitudinal Pipe and Fitting Welds
API578
API578
API578
stocking distributors
A higher degree of PMI
testing verification should
be conducted on alloy
material supplied by
stocking distributors due to
the potential for material
mix-ups as a result of
handling.
PMI
.
API578
API578 Section 4.2: ()
PMIRP-/.
PMI.
PMI.
.
Section 4.2.5 , (gasket)(bolting).
API578
4.3 Material Verification Program for Existing Piping Systems

4.3.1 General
This section covers alloy piping systems that are already in service where the
material verification program procedures for the construction were not in
accordance with 4.2. Material verification is limited to the pressure containing
components and their attachment welds. It is important to recognize that previous
maintenance activities, as well as new construction practices, may influence the
likelihood of inadvertent materials substitutions.
4.3.2 Responsibilities
The owner/user is responsible for determining if a retroactive material verification
program is appropriate for each existing piping system, for prioritizing the piping
systems to receive retroactive PMI testing, and for determining the extent of PMI
testing required.
Section 4.3
PMI 4.2 .
,
. 4.3.2 /
.
API578
4.3.3 Prioritizing Piping Systems for Retroactive PMI Testing

If the owner/user elects to prioritize piping systems for the material verification program
or needs to determine whether PMI testing is needed at all, the owner/user should
consider the following.
/ PMI, ;
a) Likelihood of a material mix-up during previous project and maintenance activities. A
key factor is the effectiveness of the material verification program at the time of these
activities.
b) Consequences of a failure. Some factors to be considered include flammability, fire
potential, toxicity, proximity to other equipment or community, temperature, pressure,
mode of failure, and size of release.
c) Reason for alloy specification (i.e. corrosion resistance or product purity).
API578
d) Historical data relating to inadvertent material substitutions. This may be related to

previous experience with material nonconformities in the process unit or within the
operating plant.
Taken together, these factors can be used to determine the risk associated with
possible material non-conformances in a piping system. The owner/user should
establish a methodology for estimating the relative priority for PMI testing of various
piping circuits within a given unit. This methodology may be based on qualitative or
quantitative risk analysis. API 581 discusses several risk-based approaches and the
factors that should be considered when conducting a risk analysis such as material,
service conditions, service fluid, and mode of failure.
,
PMI. API581.
API578
,, API580
14. The lead inspector (owner/user) has decided to prioritize existing piping
systems in the crude unit for PMI testing. Which is a consideration for prioritization?
A. How lucky he feels.
B. Likelihood of Failure
C. Consequence of failure
D. Both A and B
API578
API 581 discusses several riskbased approaches and the factors

that should be considered when
conducting a risk analysis such as
material, service conditions, service
fluid, and mode of failure.
API581
.
API578
4.3.3.1 Carbon Steel Substitutions in Low Alloy Steel Systems

In determining the likelihood of material non-conformances, it is worth noting that
historically the greatest number of material non-conformances with serious
consequences have involved carbon steel components in low alloy steel (e.g. 1
Cr Mo, 2 Cr1 Mo, 5 Cr Mo, 9 Cr1 Mo) piping systems. There have been
fewer non-conformances in stainless steel and nonferrous (e.g. Monel, Inconel)
systems because of appearance and weldability issues.
4.3.3.2 Residual Elements In Carbon Steels In Hydrofluoric Acid Alkylation
Units
Carbon steels in some specific locations in HF acid service have been reported to
suffer increased corrosion rates based on the residual elements (RE) (i.e. C, Ni, Cr,
and Cu) in the steels, and is discussed in API 751. PMI methods can be used to
assess the potential for enhanced corrosion in HF service. Consideration should be
given to the ability of the PMI method to detect the various elemental concentrations.
API578
API571/ 5.1.1.6 Hydrofluoric (HF) Acid Corrosion
In carbon steel, residual

elements ( %C, %Cu, %Ni,
%Cr) may accelerate corrosion
in certain parts of the unit but
industry recommended
guidelines have not been
formally developed. Some
users limit the total Residual
Element (RE) content to 0.20%
maximum, where RE= %Cu +
%Ni +%Cr. See Figure 5-5.
API578
It is worth noting that historically the greatest number of material nonconformances with serious consequences have involved carbon steel
components in low alloy steel
,
.
API578
API578
4.3.3.3 Gasket Materials

Incorrect gasket materials in incompatible service may cause premature failings. The
main principles outlined in this document can be applied to gasket materials. The
owner/user is required to ascertain the potential material variations and select
analytical methods capable of providing the required data. The actual test procedures
can be more detailed due to the geometric structure of the gasket materials.
4.3.3.4 Process Units Susceptible To Sulfidation.
Carbon steels with low silicon (< 0.10 %) content can corrode at an accelerated rate
when exposed to hydrogen-free sulfidation conditions. These phenomena are
discussed more extensively in AP 571 and API 939-C. Owner/users with assets at risk
from this type of degradation should consider the risks and the requirements to apply
PMI control in order to determine Silicon levels and the extent to which the material
may corrode.
API578
Sulfidation
API578
4.3.3.5 Other Factors to Consider When Prioritizing Piping Systems

Site-specific or experienced-based factors should be considered when prioritizing
piping systems. Factors to consider include the following.
a) Construction and maintenance practices. In assessing the likelihood of
material non-conformances, the owner/user should also consider the materials
handling, material control, and any PMI testing procedures followed during
construction of the process unit. Process-unit maintenance procedures are
also important. Process units in which rigorous procedures for material
verification are used would be expected to have a lower likelihood of nonconformances. .
b) Reason for the alloy specification. In some cases, alloys are used in piping
systems for reasons other than corrosion resistance or structural integrity. In
these cases, the structural integrity of the system would not be harmed by
material non-conformances. A material verification program may not be
necessary in these systems. An example would be stainless steel lube oil
systems in which stainless steel is used for maintaining oil purity.
.
API578
, ;

API578
4.3.4 Component Prioritization Factors

Based on experience, some types of piping system components can have a higher
likelihood of inadvertent substitution of a non-specified material. This can provide
a basis for prioritizing specific equipment in a given system or process unit.
Examples are:;
a) warm-up and bypass lines on pumps or check valves;
b) small diameter piping systems, including welds, with a diameter less than or equal
to 2 in. (50 mm);
c) valves and other removable devices such as rupture discs, spacer blinds, or ring
joint gaskets;
d) thermowells;
e) bolting;
f) piping as a part of a packaged system;
g) components without an ASTM stamp; ASTM
h) specific process systems with corrosion issues (e.g. residual elements in Carbon
Steels in HF Acid service or high Silicon content in potential sulfidation conditions).
API578
API578 :
specific process systems with corrosion issues (e.g. residual elements in Carbon
Steels in HF Acid service or high Silicon content in potential sulfidation conditions).
Residual elements in Carbon Steels in HF Acid service
Silicon content in potential sulfidation conditions
API578
(< 0.10%)
Sulfidic corrosion of piping and equipment within the refining industry continues to
be a significant cause of leaks and issues that can lead to early replacements,
unplanned outages, and incidents potentially resulting in loss of property and
injury to workers. Carbon steels with low silicon (<0.10%) content have been
shown to corrode at an accelerated rate when exposed to sulfidation corrosion
conditions1.
According to the American Petroleum Institute (API) Recommended Practice 939C (Guidelines for Avoiding Sulfidation Corrosion Failures in Oil Refineries), onethird of high-temperature sulfidic corrosion failures are the result of low silicon
content in piping. API RP 939-C is a subcomponent of the larger API RP 578
(Material Verification Program for New and Existing Alloy Piping Systems)
Positive Material Identification (PMI) program the verification of correct alloy
installation in all sulfidation surfaces, both proactive and reactive.
API578
4.3.5 Factors to Consider When Determining the Extent of PMI Testing

PMI
The owner/user should determine the extent of PMI testing. Factors to consider
when determining the extent of PMI testing for an existing process unit include:
a) Historical inspection and material verification program records,
b) Number of plant modifications,
c) Materials control during original construction and during modifications,
d) Material verification program quality during construction and fabrication,

PMI
e) Consequence of release,
f) Likelihood of corrosion/degradation./
API578
API578 Section 4.3:

()
- PMI: Si ()
- PMI: Re ()
API581.
4.3.5 PMI .
API578
4.4 Material Verification Program as an Element of Maintenance Systems

The principles associated with materials verification as part of a new piping installation
should also be applied to provide confidence that proper materials are being used as
part of maintenance activities. The concepts noted previously in 4.2 and API 570
should be reviewed and applied as applicable to the maintenance function.
4.4.1 Responsibilities
It is the responsibility of the owner/user to evaluate maintenance systems so that
material verification programs can be designed and implemented to effectively support
the mechanical integrity of alloy piping systems. The owner/user should establish a
written procedure for the material verification program to be used for repair of piping
systems during maintenance outages. This procedure should be documented by the
owner/user.
,, /.
.
API578
/:
/,,
//.
API578
4.4.2 Control of Incoming Materials and Warehousing
A material verification program should be directly applied to activities associated with

receiving alloy materials into warehouse systems. PMI testing may be performed as
part of this receiving function, or, when appropriate, may be performed at the suppliers
location as a condition of release for shipment. The material verification program that is
adopted should provide for proper documentation and methods for indicating which
materials have been tested and are approved for use.
The use of material verification program principles to check materials received into a
warehouse system should be regarded as a quality assurance practice to minimize the
potential for discovering an alloy material discrepancy during subsequent PMI testing.
PMI testing within the warehouse should not be regarded as an alternative to PMI
testing of the fabricated piping system when testing is specified.
,
API578
PMI testing within the warehouse should not be regarded as an

alternative to PMI testing of the fabricated piping system when
testing is specified. PMI,
PMI.
API578
PMI,
PMI
.
API578
PMI,
PMI
.
API578
4.4.3 Maintenance Activities of Piping Systems

There are a number of in-service maintenance activities where material verification
should be established. Temporary removal of spool pieces needs to be managed in
such a way that material mix-ups cannot occur. Incidents have occurred when same
size spool pieces have been removed during turnarounds and substituted into the
wrong locations during installation. Consideration shall be given to a firm control
system or a verification prior to reinstallation to prevent these incidences occurring. A
process where a system of tagging spools as they are removed to ensure correct
replacement should be considered It is important that repair procedures include
consideration of PMI testing as part of obtaining satisfactory alloy materials to be used
for the repair. As appropriate, this may include any of the components noted in 4.2.5.
Much of this can be controlled through awareness of the issues at all levels within the
repair process. Consulting with an inspector prior to commencement of work can
ensure that systems, processes and activities are in place to ensure good material
control.
//
, ,
, PMI.
API578
5 Material Verification Program Test Methods
API578
5.1 Material Verification Program Test Method Objectives

The test methods outlined in this RP are intended to identify alloy materials and are
not intended to establish the exact conformance of a material to a particular alloy
specification. Depending on the test method selected, the PMI test method may
identify the nominal composition of alloy materials. Identification of materials by
visual stamps/ markings alone should not be considered as a substitute for PMI
testing but may be an important component of an overall quality assurance
program.
API578 RP, ,
.
,PMI.
API578
API578 RP ,,
, .
API578
5.2 PMI Test Methods PMI

5.2.1 General
A variety of PMI test methods are available to determine the identity of alloy materials.
The primary methods include (1) portable X-ray fluorescenceX, (2)
portable optical emission spectroscopy, and (3) laboratory chemical
analysis. A description of several test methods is listed below.
In addition to these methods, there are a variety of alloy sorting techniques that may be
appropriate for the purposes of this RP including magnetic testing to
differentiate between ferritic and austenitic materials. It is important that users verify
what the objectives and accuracies are required from the PMI tool they wish to use. All
of the tools have benefits and limitations on the elements they can or cannot detect, in
addition to the accuracy and ability to differentiate between different material grades
which have only slight variations in alloying elements.
API578
5.2.2 Portable X-ray Fluorescence X

There are several variants of portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometers
available. The principle of operation is that one or more gamma ray or X-ray sources
are used to generate a beam of low energy radiation to excite the material under
analysis. The material under analysis then emits a characteristic radiation spectrum
which can be analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively to determine which
elements are present and in what quantity. The results of this analysis can be
reported in either or both of the following formats.
a) as a match against one of many reference spectra stored in the instrument, i.e. 316
stainless steel or 5 Cr 12 Mo steel;
b) each element present is reported as a percentage.
API578
Because of the inherent limitations of the technique it is not possible to detect all
elements. XRF analyzers are capable of detecting elements from Ti to U in the
periodic tables. This may exclude some of the important elements in carbon steels
such as C, Si, and S. In addition many analyzers are sold with basic element
packages so it is important to decide exactly what elemental analysis is required and
select an appropriate instrument.
API578
XRF method X
http://inspectioneering.com/content/2013-0301/3226/xrf-inspection-of-piping-syste
http://www.squareoneinspection.
com/XRF_Drywall.html
API578
Portable X-ray Fluorescence X
Limitation:
This may exclude some of the important elements in carbon steels such as
C, Si, and S.
API578
5.2.3 Portable Optical Emission Spectrometry

An electric arc stimulates atoms in the test sample to emit a characteristic spectrum
of light for each element in the sample. The combined light spectra from different
elements are passed through a light guide to the optical analyzer. In the analyzer,
the light is dispersed into its spectral components, and then measured and evaluated
against stored calibration curves. These devices fall into two groups;
the first being a light portable and operator evaluated device that can typically
identify up to 16 elements but depends upon operator evaluation of a light spectra.
These devices do not directly indicate alloy grade or composition, but produce an
output in the form of visible light spectra that permits semi qualitative alloy
identification The technique is also sensitive to operator skill and experience.
API578
The second group are field portable laboratory grade analyzers. These were
originally difficult to use due to their size and weight. Modern units are now available
weighing only 33 lbs including small Argon cylinders. Some operate in a pure arc mode
for routine PMI applications and the more sophisticated units have a spark mode
allowing laboratory quality analysis. The significant advantage of these instruments is
the expansion of elements that can be analyzed including C. These more advanced
instruments are also not subject to operator interpretation. Similar to X-ray
fluorescence devices, results can be reported in either a spectral match or elemental
percentage mode. As these techniques generate arcs and sparks a potential ignition
source occurs therefore prior to use of this technique in the field, a review should be
conducted to determine if gas testing and hot work permits are required.
API578
Principle:
XRF X
The principle of operation is that one or more gamma
ray or X-ray
sources X are used to generate a beam of low energy

radiation to excite the material under analysis. The material under
analysis then emits a characteristic radiation
spectrum .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Portable Optical Emission Spectrometry
An electric arc stimulates atoms in the test sample to emit
a characteristic spectrum of light for each element in the
sample.
API578
35. How do portable X-Ray Fluorescence PMI tools work?

a. Radiation waves excite the materials and the material emits a different spectrum
of radiation that can be analyzed.
b. Radiation waves excite the materials and the material emits a different spectrum
of light that can be analyzed.
c. Sound waves excite the materials and the material emits a different spectrum of
radiation that can be analyzed.
d. Sound waves excite the materials and the material emits a different spectrum of
light that can be analyzed.
API578
5.2.4 Chemical Laboratory Chemical Analysis ,

Owner/user-approved material analysis laboratories using;
(1) X-ray emission spectrometry, X
(2) optical emission spectrometry, or
(3) wet chemical analysis
can provide the most accurate analytical
results for all elements. The accuracy is
typically much higher than is normally
needed for PMI testing. Laboratory analysis
may involve the removal of significant
amounts of material, and is typically slower
than field PMI test techniques.
API578
5.2.5 Other Qualitative Tests
5.2.5.1 Chemical Spot Testing

The chemical spot test is typically accomplished by electrochemically removing a minute
amount of surface metal and depositing it onto moistened filter paper. Reagents dropped
onto the paper produce distinct colors that are indicative of the presence of specific
elements in the sample tested. Chemical spot testing is much slower than the other field
PMI test methods and interpretation is subjective.
API578
5.2.5.2 Resistivity Testing

The principle employed in the test method is known as the Seebeck Effect, or
thermoelectric principle. A heated junction of dissimilar metal is created when the
heated probe [300oF (150oC)] and the metal being tested are in contact with each
other. The voltage generated at this junction is representative of the chemistry
and crystalline structure of the metal being tested. Every alloy of a given
crystalline structure will generate the same voltage regardless of the geometry or
size of the piece being tested or the pressure applied. By references to known
standards, these instruments are capable of sorting and identifying a wide range
of ferrous and nonferrous materials. Alloy sorters have not proved to be
consistently capable of sorting low alloy (< 5 % Cr) and austenitic stainless steels.
API578
5.2.5.2 Resistivity Testing
Limitation:
Alloy sorters have not proved to be consistently capable of sorting low alloy (< 5
% Cr) and austenitic stainless steels.
API578
5.2.5.3 Other Techniques

Techniques such as;
Eddy-current sorters ,
Electromagnetic alloy sorters,
Triboelectric testing devices (e.g. ferrite meters), and
Thermoelectric tests
are qualitative and as such may only be appropriate for limited sorting
applications and not for specific alloy identification.
ferrite meters
API578
5.3 Equipment Calibration

The person performing the PMI testing should calibrate and/or verify the test
equipment performance as specified by the equipment manufacturer. The
PMI test procedure should provide the frequency interval for this calibration/
verification. If calibration procedures are not provided by the equipment
manufacturer, they should be established by the owner/user. Typically, these
procedures should include calibration/verification using certified standards.
, PMI.
, /
.
API578
API578
5.4 Equipment Precision

The precision of the test equipment should be consistent with the established test
objectives (see 5.1). When component composition is desired, the owner/user
should establish the acceptable precision and repeatability. The accuracy and
the method in which accuracy is determined needs to be understood. For example,
in some tools, the sensitivity may be dependent upon how long you conduct the test
in order to improve signal averaging algorithms. Failure to understand these issues
may produce inaccurate results.
( 5.1)
, /
API578
API578 RP ,,
, .
(RP, )
API578
5.5 Personnel Qualifications

The person(s) performing the PMI test should be knowledgeable about all aspects of
operation of PMI test equipment and the PMI test method used. Qualifications of the
person performing the PMI test, including training and experience, should be
submitted for review and approval by the owner/user. Owner/users should ensure
that personnel using testing devices are adequately trained not only in the specific
instrument but also in the alloys they will be examining. In some cases for critical
application a formal documented program and some form of testing of personnel
may be required. The higher the degree of operator analysis the more important this
aspect of the whole procedure becomes.
,PMI
. /.
API578
5.6 Safety Issues

The specific requirements for each PMI test technique should be clearly reviewed as
to the amount of mechanical preparation. Consideration should be given to the
anticipated thickness of the sample before mechanical methods are used to
prepare the sample. In addition, considerations for electrical arcing and hot
spots should be considered as well as appropriate electrical and hot work
permits. Chemical spot testing involves the use of a variety of chemicals.
Appropriate safety precautions should be taken when handling these chemicals.
:

PMI

API578
6 Evaluation of PMI Test Results
API578
6.1 Material Acceptance Methods

The owner/user may elect any one of the following methods of material acceptance.
a) Materials can be confirmed to contain the nominal amounts of alloying elements
specified in the relevant materials specification (e.g. ASME Section II or ASTM
specifications).
b) Materials can be classified through a qualitative sorting technique (see 5.2.4) to
establish the conformance with the intended material.
c) When PMI testing indicates alloying elements are outside the ranges indicated
in the material specification, the owner/user may still choose to allow the use of
the tested materials in situations where a person knowledgeable of the
appropriate damage mechanisms confirms that the material will perform
satisfactorily in the service. ,.
d) If testing using one of the portable or qualitative analysis methods (see 5.2.1 or
5.2.2) leads to the potential rejection of a component, a more accurate analysis
may be used to determine component acceptance (see 5.2.3).
.
API578
6.1 Material Acceptance Methods

/
a)
b)
c)
d)
.(/)
.
API578
6.2 Dissimilar Metal Welds and Weld Overlays
Results from testing dissimilar metal welds should take into account the effects of
dilution, which occurs during weld deposition. The owner/user should establish the
minimum compositional requirements of the as-deposited weld metal necessary for
the intended service.
:
6.3 Follow-up PMI Testing after Discovery of a Nonconformity
If any one of a representative sample is rejected, all items of that inspection lot
should be considered suspect. A more extensive inspection of the remaining lot
should be considered.
PMI, ..
API578
7 Marking and Recordkeeping
API578
7.1 Materials Identification Process

Alloy materials should be identified by their alloy designation or nominal composition.
Examples of some acceptable identification methods are:
a) color coding by alloy,
b) a low-stress stamp marking indicating that the test has been performed,
c) documentation showing both the PMI test results and the PMI test locations.
PMI
Test locations should be shown on appropriate drawings so that each test site can be
traceable to the fabricated piping components.
API578
7.1.1 Color Coding/Marking /

If the material verification program procedure established by the owner/user
requires a visual identification such as color coding or marking, the owner/user
should maintain a record of the alloy material/color code combinations. Pipe
Fabrication Institute (PFI) Standard ES22 is an example of one such system.
Materials identification by color coding is not a substitute for permanent
manufacturers markings required by applicable ASTM or other materials
specifications.
API578
7.1.2 Marking of Components

If the owner/users documentation process requires physical marking of piping
components, it should specify one of the following.
a) Whether or not the marking system should remain legible for the expected life of
the component without deterioration due to corrosion or elevated temperature.
b) Whether or not the marking system is only temporary to facilitate proper
handling and identification from the point of PMI testing to final installation. This
marking can be semi permanent paint applied to each item. The markers should
not contain additives such as metallic pigments (Al, Pb, or Zn), sulfur or
chlorides.
(Al, Pb, or Zn), sulfur or chlorides.
API578
7.2 Material Certifications

Material certifications, mill test reports, or certificates of compliance should not be
considered a substitute for PMI testing, but may be an important part of an overall
quality assurance program.
PMI.
7.3 Shop and Field PMI Test Documentation PMI
Those individuals performing PMI testing should obtain and follow the PMI test
procedure approved by the owner/ user. This procedure should cover the
technique used, equipment calibration, the qualification requirements of PMI test
personnel, the testing methodology, and documentation requirements. When
documentation, such as drawings, is used in lieu of physical marking, the
documentation should allow the owner/user to identify which components were
tested.PMI.
API578
7.4 New and Existing Piping System Documentation
When PMI testing is conducted on new or existing piping systems, records of the
results should be kept as long as the piping system exists in its original location.
If a piping system or a portion of a piping system that has not received material
verification is relocated, the owner/user should consider the need for PMI testing
prior to placing the relocated components into service.
?
, PMI.
,/PMI
API578
7.5 PMI Test Records

Typical PMI test records should contain the following.
a) Reference to the PMI test procedures used./
b) Date of testing.
c) Test instrument identification number or serial number where appropriate.
d) Name of each person and company performing the tests. /

e) Results of the tests.
f) Basis and action for resolving and documenting PMI test nonconformances
including those that have been left in service.
g) Documentation of the criteria used for prioritization of piping systems and extent
of PMI testing performed. Alternately, the owner/user may choose to include this
within the written material verification procedure. When included in the
owner/users written material verification procedure, the date and edition number
of the written procedure should be documented in the test record.
/.
API578
7.6 PMI Test Procedures

The PMI test procedure should include the techniques used, equipment
calibration elements, the qualification requirements for PMI test personnel, the
testing methodology, acceptance criteria and the documentation requirements.
7.7 Traceability to Field Components
The information listed in 7.5 should be reported in such a manner that they are
traceable to the point of installation.
API578
API578
API578
1. API 578 provides guidelines for a quality assurance system to verify:

a.
b.
c.
d.
all materials.
b. all alloy materials.
c. only non-ferrous materials.
d. only high-alloy materials.
3. An alloy material is any metallic material that contains alloying elements

that are added:
a. only to improve mechanical properties.
b. only to improve corrosion resistance.
c. to improve either mechanical properties or improve corrosion resistance
API578
5. An inspection lot includes:

a.
b.
c.
d.
all materials from same supplier.

all materials included on the same purchase order.
all materials of the same material type (i.e. 316 SS)
all materials of the same material type from the same supplier and heat.
6. A documented material verification program should be established by the:

a.
b.
c.
d.
Authorized inspector.
Owner/User.
Repair organization.
Engineering organization.
API578
7. The material verification program should cover PMI testing of materials:

a. during construction of piping systems.
b. in existing piping systems.
c. during repairs and alterations of piping systems.
d. in existing piping systems and during construction, repairs and alterations of
piping systems.
8. Random sampling is most appropriate for:

a. low-risk systems.
b. low alloy systems.
c. stainless steel systems.
d. ferritic steel systems.
API578
9. Who has the responsibility to determine the extent of PMI performed?

a.
b.
c.
d.
Authorized inspector
Owner/User
Repair organization
Engineering organization.
10. Who has the responsibility to verify that the material verification program is
properly implemented?
a.
b.
c.
d.
Authorized inspector
Owner/User
Repair organization
Engineering organization
API578
11. Who has the responsibility to review and approve the adequacy of the PMI
program used by fabricators and material suppliers?
a. Authorized inspector
b. Owner/User
c. Repair organization
d. Engineering organization
12. A mill test report:

a. eliminates the need for further material verification.
b. is a report showing material discrepancies.
c. is an important part of the material qualify assurance program.
d. is issued by the owner upon receipt of materials.
API578
13. The material verification program specified by API 578 covers:

a. only pressure-containing components
b. only pipe, and fittings.
c. only pipe, fittings, and welds.
d. pressure-containing and non-pressure containing components.
14. During alloy welding:

a. one electrode from each box should be sampled.
b. two electrodes from each box should be sampled.
c. one electrode from each lot should be sampled.
d. two electrodes from each lot should be sampled.
API578
15. If alloy element(s) are contained in the flux of a welding electrode, PMI testing:
a. is not necessary.
b. is not necessary provided appropriate documentation is provided by the supplier.
c. could be conducted on any of the production welds.
d. could be conducted on a weld button prior to production welds.
16. New longitudinal welded alloyed pipe should:

a. never be used.
b. be used only if the Quality Factor is 1.0.
c. receive random PMI testing of weld and base metal.
d. receive 100% PMI testing of weld and base metal.
API578
17. Who has the responsibility to determine the extent of PMI testing required on
existing piping systems?
b. Owner/User
19. Incorrect substitution of carbon steel is most likely to be found in:

a. chrome steels.
b. stainless steels.
c. any ferritic steel.
d. any non-ferrous.
API578
20. Which of the following piping components is most likely to have a substitution with the
wrong material?
a. A 20 length of 6 NPS pipe
b. Weld-neck flange
c. Expansion joint
d. Bolting
21. Which of the following piping components is most likely to have a substitution with the
wrong material?
a. A 10 length of 6 NPS 316L SS pipe
b. 6 NPS Gate valve
c. 4 NPS Monel elbow
d. Slip-on flange
API578
22. Who has the responsibility to determine the extent of PMI testing required during
repairs and alterations of piping systems?
b. Owner/User
23. PMI testing at the warehouse is:
a. done by only checking material stampings.
b. accomplished by the Authorized Inspector.
c. not important since materials will be checked during fabrication.
d. not an important part of the material verification program.
e. not a substitute for PMI testing required during fabrication.
API578
24. Identification of materials by visual stamps or markings:

a. is not an important part of the material verification program.
b. is not a substitute for PMI testing.
c. is important only on high alloy materials.
d. should only be done by inspectors.
25. PMI tools that use X-Ray fluorescence can not detect:
a. carbon content.
b. chrome content.
c. iron content.
d. molybdenum content.
API578
26. How does Portable Optical Emission Spectrometry determine the elements in a
material?
a. An electric arc causes a spectrum of light to be emitted from the tested material.
The light is analyzed.
b. X-rays striking the material cause a spectrum of x-rays to be emitted from the
tested material. The x-rays are analyzed.
c. Specific chemicals deposited on the tested material cause a spectrum of colors to
be emitted. The colors are analyzed.
d. The surface is polished and etched. A replication is preformed and is analyzed
with a microscope.
27. PMI testing equipment should be:
a. calibrated every 4 hrs.
b. calibrated as specified by the manufacturer.
c. used only by the manufacturers personnel.
d. used by owner/user personnel.
API578
28. All personnel performing PMI tests should be:

a. qualified by national exam.
b. qualified by the owner/user.
c. knowledgeable about the operation of the PMI test equipment.
d. knowledgeable about the operation of the plant where the PMI is conducted.
29. An alloy weld overlay is applied to carbon steel base metal. Who has the
responsibility to establish the minimum alloy requirements of the as-deposited weld
metal?
b. Owner/User
API578
30. What is the appropriate action to take when an incorrect material is located during
a PMI sampling of new materials.
a. Inspect 2 more items from the inspection lot.
b. Inspect 50% of the items from the inspection lot.
c. Inspect 100% of the items from the inspection lot.
d. Inspection all items supplied by that manufacturer.
31. Marking pens should not contain chlorides or:

a. Carbon.
b. Chrome.
c. Oxides.
d. Sulfur.
API578
Answers:
1. b. all alloy materials.
3. c. to improve either mechanical properties or improve corrosion resistance
5. d. all materials of the same material type from the same supplier and heat
6. b. Owner/User
7. d. in existing piping systems and during construction, repairs and alterations
8. a. low-risk systems
9. b. Owner/User
10. b. Owner/User
11. b. Owner/User
12. c. is an important part of the material qualify assurance program
13. a. only pressure-containing components
14. c. on electrode from each lot should be sampled
15. d. could be conducted on a weld button prior to production welds
16. c. receive random PMI testing of weld and base metal
17. b. Owner/User
API578
19. a. chrome steel

20. d. bolting
21. b. Valve
22. b. Owner/User
23. e. not a substitute for PMI testing required during fabrication.
24. b. is not a substitute for PMI testing
25. a. carbon content
26. a. an electrode arc causes a spectrum of light to be emitted from the tested material.
27. b. calibrated as specified by the manufacturer
28. c. knowledgeable about the operation of the PMI test equipment
29. b. Owner/User
30. c. inspect 100% of the items from the inspection lot / 31. d. sulfur
API578
API578
1. API 578 provides guidelines for a material assurance system to verify:

a. all materials.
b. all alloy materials.
c. only non-ferrous materials.
d. only high-alloy materials.
2. The material verification program specified by API 578 covers:
a. only pressure-containing components.
b. only pipe, and fittings.
c. only pipe, fittings, and welds.
d. pressure-containing and non-pressure containing components.
API578
3. An alloy material is any metallic material that contains alloying elements that
are added:
a. only to improve mechanical properties.
b. only to improve corrosion resistance.
c. to improve either mechanical properties or corrosion resistance.
4. An inspection lot includes:
a. all materials from a common source.
b. all materials included on the same purchase order.
c. all materials of the same material type (i.e. 316 SS)
d. all materials from a common source, of the same material type and
same heat.
API578
5. For construction and repair activities a written material verification

program should be established by the:
a. API 570 Authorized Inspector.
b. Engineering Organization.
c. Owner/User.
d. Repair Organization.
6. The material verification program should cover PMI testing of materials:
a. during construction of piping systems.
b. in existing piping systems.
c. during repairs and alterations of piping systems.
d. in existing piping systems and during construction, repairs and
alterations of piping systems.
API578
7. During repairs, random PMI sampling of new components is most appropriate

for:
a. low-risk piping systems.
b. low alloy piping systems.
c. stainless steel piping systems.
d. ferritic steel piping systems.
e. all piping systems.
8. Who has the responsibility to determine the extent of PMI performed?
a. API 570 Authorized Inspector
b. Owner/User
c. Piping Engineer
d. Repair Organization
API578
9. During construction the Owner should consider 100% PMI of new

components on:
a. all piping systems.
b. all alloys above P-5.
c. exotic alloys.
d. high-risk piping systems.
API578
10. Usually substituting an alloy for carbon steel does not cause a problem. But
hardenable alloys may cause failure in some carbon steel systems. Which of
the following process services would substituting an alloy for carbon steel
not result in a potential problem.
a. Benzene
b. Hydrofluoric acid (HF)
c. Sulfuric acid
d. Wet hydrogen sulfide
11. Who is responsible to assure that the material verification program meets
the guidelines of API 578?
a. Authorized Inspector
b. Examiner
c. Owner/User
d. Piping Engineer
API578
12. Who is responsibility to verify the adequacy of the material verification

program that is performed by material suppliers?
a. API PMI Specialist
b. Authorized Inspector
c. Piping Engineer
d. Owner/User
13. Who has the responsibility to review and approve the adequacy of the PMI
program used by fabricators?
b. API 578 Certified Inspector
c. Engineering Organization
d. Owner/User
e. Repair Organization
API578
14. A mill test report:

a. eliminates the need for further material verification.
b. is a report showing material discrepancies.
c. is an important part of the material qualify assurance program.
d. is issued by the owner upon receipt of materials.
15. During construction, which of the following alloy components does not need
to be covered by a material verification program?
a. Bolts
b. Expansion Joints
c. Gaskets
d. Pressure containing welds
e. All the above components need to be checked
API578
16. During alloy welding:

a. one electrode from each pallet should be identified.
b. two electrodes from each pallet should be identified.
c. one electrode from each lot or package should be identified.
d. two electrodes from each lot or package should be identified.
17. If alloy element(s) are contained in the flux of a welding electrode, PMI
testing:
a. is not necessary.
b. is not necessary provided appropriate documentation is provided by
the supplier.
c. could be conducted on any of the production welds.
d. could be conducted on a weld button prior to production welds.
API578
18. New longitudinal welded alloyed pipe should:

a. never be used.
b. always receive random PMI testing of weld and base metal.
c. receive random PMI testing of weld and base metal if there is a
reason to suspect problems.
d. always receive 100% PMI testing of weld and base metal.
19. PMI of autogenous welds is:
a. always required.
b. never required.
c. not required if the weld rod was PMI tested.
d. not required if the base metal was PMI tested.
API578
20. Who has the responsibility to determine the extent of PMI testing required
on existing piping systems?
a. API Authorized Inspector
b. Engineering Organization
c. Owner/User
21. When prioritizing the need for PMI on existing piping systems, which of the
following is not a factor to consider?
a. Age of the facility
b. Consequence of failure
c. Likelihood of failure
d. Plant experience with inadvertent material substitutions
e. Reason for the alloy
API578
22. Incorrect substitution of carbon steel is most likely to be found in:

a. chrome systems.
b. stainless systems.
c. any ferritic systems.
d. any non-ferrous systems.
23. Which residual element in a carbon steel system has not caused increased
corrosion rates in HF acid piping system?
a. C
b. Cr
c. Cu
d. Fe
e. Ni
API578
24. Low silicon carbon steel can corrode rapidly when exposed to:
a. hydrogen-free sulfidation.
b. hydrogen-rich sulfidation.
c. hydrogen-free oxidation.
d. hydrogen-rich oxidation.
25. Carbon steel can corrode rapidly in hydrogen-free sulfidation when the
silicon content in carbon steel is:
a. < 0.10%.
b. > 0.10%.
c. < 0.25%.
d. > 0.25%.
API578
26. The owner decides to conduct PMI testing on some existing piping systems.
Which of the following is a major factor in prioritizing the pipe?
a. The effectiveness of the construction & maintenance practices
b. The effectiveness of the inspection practices
c. Age of the unit
d. Line size
27. Which of the following piping components is most likely to have a
substitution with the wrong material?
a. A 20 length of 6 NPS pipe
b. Weld-neck flange
c. Expansion joint
d. Bolting
API578
28. Which of the following piping components is most likely to have a

substitution with the wrong material?
a. A 10 length of 6 NPS 316L SS pipe
b. 6 NPS Gate valve
c. 4 NPS Monel elbow
d. Slip-on flange
29. Who has the responsibility to determine the extent of PMI testing required
during repairs and alterations of piping systems?
c. Owner/User
API578
30. Who has the responsibility to evaluate the effectiveness of a PMI program
during repairs and alterations?
a. API Authorized Inspector
b. Examiner
c. Owner/User
d. Piping Engineer
e. Repair Organization
31. During repairs and alterations the Owner should:
a. use NACE certified examiners.
b. have a written procedure describing their PMI program.
c. PMI test 100% of all materials.
d. PMI test 100% of all alloy materials.
API578
32. PMI testing at the warehouse is:

a. done by only checking material stampings.
b. accomplished by the Authorized Inspector.
c. not important since materials will be checked during fabrication.
d. not an important part of the material verification program.
e. not a substitute for PMI testing required during fabrication.
33. In the petrochemical industry, one common material mix-up problem occurs:
a. when temporarily removing spool pieces.
b. when sending pumps out for repair.
c. by using carbon steel in a 300 series stainless steel system.
d. by using 300 series stainless steel in a carbon steel system.
API578
34. Identification of materials by visual stamps or markings:

35. How do portable X-Ray Fluorescence PMI tools work?
a. Radiation waves excite the materials and the material emits a different spectrum
of radiation that can be analyzed.
b. Radiation waves excite the materials and the material emits a different spectrum
of light that can be analyzed.
c. Sound waves excite the materials and the material emits a different spectrum of
radiation that can be analyzed.
d. Sound waves excite the materials and the material emits a different spectrum of
light that can be analyzed.
API578
36. PMI tools that use X-Ray fluorescence can not detect:
a. carbon.
b. chrome.
c. iron.
d. molybdenum.
37. How does Portable Optical Emission Spectrometry determine the elements
in a material?
a. An electric arc causes a spectrum of light to be emitted from the tested material.
b. An electric arc causes a spectrum of radiation to be emitted from the tested
material. The radiation is analyzed.
c. X-rays striking the material cause a spectrum of radiation to be emitted from the
tested material. The radiation is analyzed.
d. Specific chemicals deposited on the tested material cause a spectrum of colors to
be emitted. The colors are analyzed.
e. The surface is polished and etched. A replication is preformed and is analyzed
with a microscope.
API578
38. Chemical spot testing:

a. is the fastest PMI technique.
b. provides an accurate way to determine the percentage of the types of metals in the
material.
c. uses droplets of acids or caustics that are placed on the component. Different colors
indicated different materials.
d. removes a small amount of surface metal that is placed in a filter paper. Small
droplets of reagents are used on the sample and different colors indicated different
materials.
39. PMI tools that use Resistivity Testing are not always able to sort:
a. low chromes.
b. high chromes.
c. 300 series stainless steels.
d. 400 series stainless steels.
e. low chromes and 300 series stainless steels.
f. high chromes and 400 series stainless steels.
API578
40. PMI testing equipment should be:

a. calibrated every 4 hrs.
b. calibrated as specified by the manufacturer.
c. used only by the manufacturers personnel.
d. used by owner/user personnel.
41. All personnel performing PMI tests should be:
a. qualified by national exam.
b. qualified by the owner/user.
c. knowledgeable about the operation of the PMI test equipment.
d. knowledgeable about the operation of the plant where the PMI is conducted.
API578
42. Qualifications for personnel performing PMI testing should be submitted

and reviewed by:
a. API.
b. ASNT.
c. the Authorized Inspection.
d. the Owner/User.
e. the Piping Engineer.
43. When PMI testing indicates that an alloy is outside the range allowed on the
material spec, the component can:
a. never be used.
b. be used if the alloy percentages exceed requirements.
c. be used in low risk piping systems.
d. be used if accepted by the Owner/User following an assessment.
API578
44. An alloy weld overlay is applied to carbon steel base metal. What will occur?
a. Cracking due to differential expansion rates
b. Dilution
c. Lack of Fusion
d. Underbead cracking
45. An alloy weld overlay is applied to carbon steel base metal. Who has the
responsibility to establish the minimum alloy requirements of the as deposited
weld metal?
c. Owner/User
d. Repair organization
API578
46. What is the appropriate action to take when an incorrect material is located
during a PMI sampling of an inspection lot?
a. Inspect 2 more items from the inspection lot.
b. Inspect 50% of the items from the inspection lot.
c. Inspect 100% of the items from the inspection lot.
d. Inspection all items supplied by that manufacturer.
e. A more extensive inspection of the lot should be considered.
47. A color code system for pipe is specified by:
a. ASME B31.3.
b. ASME 16.34.
c. NACE 3389.
d. PFI ES22.
API578
48. Identification of materials by color coding:

49. Which of the following is not required when the owners PMI system
requires physical marking of components?
a. Whether the marking should remain legible for the components life
b. The name of individual doing the marking
c. If colors are used, a description of color used for each alloy
API578
50. Marking pens should not contain chlorides or:

a. Carbon.
b. Chrome.
c. Oxides.
d. Sulfur.
51. When PMI testing is conducted on a new piping system, the documentation
of the PMI results should be kept:
a. until the piping system is operational.
b. 1 year.
c. until piping system is no longer in operation.
d. until piping system is removed/scrapped.
e. forever.
API578
API578
API578
1. RP 578 applies to _______________________________process piping systems

covered by ASME B 31.3 and API 570 piping codes.
A. New
B. Existing
C. New and Existing
D. None of the Above
2. RP 578 applies to ____________________________materials purchased directly
or indirectly by the owner/user.
A. all materials
B. metallic and non metallic
C. metallic alloy
D. all grades of monel
API578
3. Carbon steel components________________ under the Scope of RP 578.

A. are specifically covered.
B. are not specifically covered
C. are optional
D. none of the above
4. Any metallic material (including welding filler metals) that contains alloying
elements such as chromium,nickel, or molybdenum, which are intentionally added to
enhance mechanical or physical properties and/or corrosion resistance is
called___________
A. A 53B pipe.
B. Austenitic material.
C. alloy material.
API578
5. _____________________ is an organization that performs or services and directly

controls one or more of the operations that affect the chemical composition or
mechanical properties of a metallic material.
A. A material manufacturer
B. A distributor
C. A fabricator
D. A owner/user
6. An organization that supplies materials furnished and certified by a material
manufacturer, but does not perform any operation intended to alter the material
properties required by the applicable material specification is a _____________.
A. distributor.
B. fabricator.
C. material supplier.
D. material manufacture.
API578
7. Who has the responsibility to determine the extent of examination required and to verify
the material verification program is performed in accordance with RP 578?
A. engineer
B. owner/user or designee
C. Tim Schindler
D. material supplier
8. Review and approval of the material verification program and testing procedure of the
fabricator or material supplier should be done:
A. Prior to PMI testing.
B. After PMI testing.
C. Any time prior to hydrotesting.
D. Both A and B.
API578
9. Mill Test Reports _________________considered a substitute for PMI testing.

A. and X-rays are
B. should be
C. should not be
D. can be
10. Which of the following is an example of a pressure-containing component that
makes up a fabricated piping system covered in the Material Verification Program?
A. Instruments
B. dummy legs
C. spring cans
API578
11. Verification of the alloy materials subsequently placed into service are as specified is a
responsibility of:
A. Authorized inspector
B. Engineer
C. Owner/User or designee
D. None of the above
12. You have received a shipment of alloy electrodes and wire from your supplier. How
much PMI testing should you perform?
A. Positively identify two electrodes or wire samples from each lot or package.
B. Positively identify one electrode or wire sample from each lot or package.
C. As determined by the owner/user
D. No testing is required.
API578
13. A new section of seamed (longitudinal) alloy pipe is to be used for repairs and
requires PMI testing, where should PMI testing be performed?
A. PMI the weld metal only.
B. PMI the base metal only.
C. PMI the base metal and weld metal
D. No testing is required. You only need to verify the correct ASTM markings are on the
pipe.
14. The lead inspector (owner/user) has decided to prioritize existing piping systems in
the crude unit for PMI testing. Which is a consideration for prioritization?
A. How lucky he feels.
B. Likelihood of Failure
C. Consequence of failure
D. Both A and B
API578
15. The greatest Number of material non conformities with serious consequence have
involved carbon steel components in ____________
A. non ferrous systems.
B. stainless steel systems.
C. low alloy systems.
D. non metallic systems.
16. _____________ should be considered when determining the extent of PMI testing
for existing units.
A. The plant manufacturer
B. The type of PMI equipment available
C. The number of plant modifications
D. The number of previous plant turnarounds
API578
17. Which is not an example of a component prioritization factor?

A. Warm-up and bypass lines on pumps or check valves.
B. Small diameter piping systems.
C. Components with ASTM stamp.
D. Components without an ASTM stamp.
18. Calibration and/or verification of the PMI test equipment should be performed:
A. Before and after every use.
B. Once every quarter.
C. As determined by the AI.
D. As specified the equipment manufacturer.
API578
19. If PMI equipment calibration/verification procedures are not provided by the

equipment manufacturer,_________________
A. they should be established by the owner/user.
B. they should be established by the authorized inspector.
C. then equipment calibration is not required.
D. then a complete refund of the equipment should be obtained.
20. Personnel performing PMI testing should be:
A. Trained by Tim Schindler.
B. Knowledgeable about all aspects of B31.3 and API 570.
C. Certified to ASME Sec V.
D. Knowledgeable about all aspects of operation of PMI test equipment.
API578
21. What safety considerations are there when performing PMI testing?
a. All PMI testing requires a hot work permit and a fire watch.
b. Appropriate electrical permits, and hot work permits.
c. Consider electrical arching and hot spots, appropriate electrical and hot work
permits.
d. Always test the Ground Fault interrupter.
22. What is an acceptable method of material acceptance?
a. Materials can be classified through a qualitative sorting technique to establish the
conformance with the intended material.
b. Materials can be confirmed to contain nominal amounts of alloying elements
specified in relevant materials specifications.
c. Materials can be confirmed to contain nominal amounts of alloying elements
specified in the written procedure.
d. Both A and B
API578
23. You are the QA inspector of a new construction project and have been informed that
some 5 Chrome fittings were PMI tested and the alloying elements are outside the
ranges that allowed in the ASTM material specification, could these fittings still be
used for your project?
a. No, these fittings should be rejected and sent back to the supplier.
b. Yes, provided they are higher than the specified ranges allowed by ASTM and a
person knowledgeable of the appropriate damage mechanisms confirms that the
materials will perform satisfactory in the service.
c. Yes, provided a person knowledgeable of the appropriate damage mechanisms
confirms that the materials will perform satisfactory in the service.
d. Yes, proved the supplier signs off that the materials in question are acceptable.
API578
24. You are testing one representative fitting from a lot and find it rejectable, you
should________.
A. consider the entire lot suspect and send it back to the supplier.
B. consider the entire lot suspect and conduct a more extensive inspection.
C. reject the bad fitting and assume the remainder of the lot is acceptable.
D. inform the manufacturer of his poor quality materials.
25. Material test reports should _______________
a. be considered a substitute for PMI testing as long as the project engineer signs off
they are acceptable.
b. be considered a substitute for PMI testing as long as metallurgists signs off they are
acceptable.
c. be considered a substitute for PMI testing when it is near the end of the project.
d. not be considered a substitute for PMI testing.
API578
26. How long should records of PMI testing for new and existing piping systems be
kept?
a. Records should be kept as long as the piping system remains in the original
location.
b. Records should be kept until the next PMI survey is performed
c. Records should be kept as long as the plant is not sold.
d. None of the above.
API578
API578
Photos to share
API578
Chemical Laboratory Chemical

Analysis
API578
Chemical Laboratory Chemical Analysis
API578
Chemical Laboratory
Chemical Analysis
API578

574-12
API ICP
My Self Study Notes
API ICP
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1dDcSwlN
http://www.slideshare.net/charliechong/
http://issuu.com/charlieccchong/
https://www.yumpu.com/zh/browse/user/charliechong
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1sjueQ2D
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1pJwQHD5
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1qW4qoHm
http://home.126disk.com/charliechong
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/7fq2keio53max/
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/u8v4ayqbvrwl0/
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/c935doao7pq4i/
API ICP
API ICP
API ICP
API ICP
API ICP
API ICP

API578 - My Self Study Notes

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

API578 - My Self Study Notes

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Material Verification Program for New

and Existing Alloy Piping Systems

Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

6 Evaluation of PMI Test Results

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Alloy components within the pressure envelope

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

RP On ferrous and nonferrous alloys during the construction,

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Carbon steel components specified in new or existing piping

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

API578 Applicable: construction,

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Carbon steel components specified in new or existing piping systems are

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.1.1 Alloy Substitutions in Carbon Steel Systems

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.2 New Construction Quality Assurance (QA) Material Verification

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.2.1 Roles and Responsibilities

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.2.2 Material Verification Test Procedure Review

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.2.4 Mill Test Report

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.2.5 Components Covered in a Material Verification Program

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.2.6 PMI Testing of Welding Consumables

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.2.6.1 Longitudinal Pipe and Fitting Welds

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Longitudinal Pipe and Fitting Welds

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

API578 Section 4.2: ()

Fion Zhang/ Charlie Chong

4.3 Material Verification Program for Existing Piping Systems

4.3.3 Prioritizing Piping Systems for Retroactive PMI Testing