Law
Contributors : Prof. Aparna Nashikkar
Prof. Latika Salgaonkar
Prof. Hemangini Shah
Prof. Pankaj Dahibhate
Page 1 of 23
Business Laws
Corporate laws are vital and play an important part in business transactions. A person must be
aware how to tackle any legal issues so as to have a smooth and steady functioning of his
business. The following Acts have been incorporated in our syllabus so as to give a thought to
the subject.
Session No
Name of Topic
Required Reading
I Contract Act
Akhileshwar Pathak
Business Law, S S Gulshan
Jain
Merchantile Law, Dr. R K
Chopra
Mercantile
law,
N.
D.
Kapoor
Consideration Definition and rules for
valid consideration, Exception to no
consideration no contract
law,
N.
D.
Kapoor
law,
N.
D.
Kapoor
Legal Object- essentials, unlawful and
illegal agreements, void agreements,
contingent contracts, Discharge of
contract, Remedies for breach of
contract, Quasi contracts
law,
N.
D.
Kapoor
Legal Aspects of Business,
5
Akhileshwar Pathak
Business Law, S S Gulshan
Merchantile Laws, Dr. V K
Page 3 of 23
Jain
Merchantile Law, Dr. R K
Chopra
Mercantile
law,
N.
D.
Kapoor
6
Case I
Mercantile law by N. D.
Consumer,
Kapoor,
trader,
person,
goods,
manufacturer,
service,
complaint
Akhileshwar Pathak
consumer dispute
Consumer
8
protection
councils,
Mercantile law by N. D.
Kapoor,
Legal Aspects of Business,
Akhileshwar Pathak
Case-II
Characteristics
of
Negotiable
Page 4 of 23
11
12
Negotiation,
Chopra
Endorsement
&
Mercantile law by N. D.
Kapoor,
Case-III
goods,
and
Chopra
and
Mercantile law by N. D.
price,
Warranties,
Conditions
implied
conditions
warranties
Kapoor,
14
Akhileshwar Pathak
Merchantile Laws, Dr. V K
Jain
Merchantile Law, Dr. R K
Chopra
Mercantile law by N. D.
Page 5 of 23
Kapoor,
15
Case-IV
V Companies Act
Companies Act, Dr. Avtar
Singh
Legal Aspects of Business,
Akhileshwar Pathak
Definition of Company, Incorporation
16
Maheshwari
Mercantile law by N. D.
Kapoor
17
Maheshwari
Mercantile law by N. D.
Kapoor
18
Case-V
19
20
21
Case-VI
Oppression
and
Mismanagement, Singh
VI Competition Law
Mercantile law by N. D.
Competition
23
purpose,
Law
concept
Definitions-
and
acquisition,
Kapoor,
Legal Aspects of Business,
Akhileshwar Pathak
24
Case-VII
Anti-competition agreements, Abuse of
dominant position
Combinations,
Mercantile law by N. D.
regulation
combinations,
Kapoor,
Establishment
25
of
of
competition
commission of India,
Composition ,
duties
and
power
of commission,
penalties
VII
Environment Protection Act
Page 8 of 23
27
Case-VIII
can be
License,
Termination
and
29
IPR, N. K. Archarya
30
Case-IX
IX
32
33
Kapoor,
Legal Aspects of Business,
Akhileshwar Pathak
Page 9 of 23
Page 10 of 23
Case no.01
1. Rodney agrees to pay pocket money to his son Roco sum of Rs. 1,500/- per month for 12
months starting November 2013, after paying for first two months Rodney stops paying
Roco pocket money without any explanation. Discuss whether this is a valid contract.
2. Adam a car dealer induces Annette to buy a car from his shop and depicts that same is
brand new. Annette buys the car on Adams representation, after driving for few
kilometres the car breaks down. Discuss whether Annette can cancel the contract and
claim damages?
3. Anita agrees to sell her farm to Sarah for Rs. 50,000/- . Sarah sends her cash of Rs.
25,000/- and agrees to pay the balance in 10 instalments of Rs. 2,500/- each. Discuss
whether this a valid contract?
4. Frank received summons to appear in the court as witness at a trial. Richard promised to
pay Frank Rs. 5,000/- for his appearance. After the court date Richard refuses to pay
Frank, discuss whether Richard could sue Frank and recover the money.
Page 11 of 23
Case no.02
1. Abhilasha booked a ticket with the Railways to travel from Chennai to Delhi in the
Superfast Train Taj Express. The Taj Express started from the scheduled station of
departure on time but was delayed for long hours. The Railways was not in a position to
justify the delay nor give any valid and convincing reasons for such a delay. Abhilasha
was too irritated with the long journey. Abhilasha could not tolerate this long delay and
claimed from the Railways Rs. 1,00,000/- for the inconvenience caused to her. She is
also claiming that the Railways pay her the amount of Rs. 5000/- as compensation for the
expenditures incurred by her on the food during that long journey. Can Abhilasha
succeed on this ground by filing a complaint against the Railways? Give reasons.
2. Indresh had applied for electricity connection in the month of August 2011. He was told
that he shall get the connection within two days. However, no connection was not
provided to him till November 2011. But he has been asked to remain present at the
electricity office to state reasons as to why there is no consumption of the connection.
Can Indresh seek redressal in a Consumer Court? If yes, how on what grounds?
3. Mr. Sanjay had an internet connection at home. He was expecting an important interview
call. The net connection was not working properly. Mr. Sanjay sent a written complaint
to the net provider about the net connection not working properly. The connection was
set right after 3 days and Mr. Sanjay lost his opportunity as he could not access his net.
He has filed a complaint against the net provider claiming for damages. The net provider
says he is not responsible as Mr. Sanjay never mentioned the urgency. Can Mr. Sanjays
claim stand? Is he a consumer?
Page 12 of 23
Page 13 of 23
Case no.03
discuss whether Brian promise to pay constitutes valid promise and is a promissory note?
borrowed for his daughters marriage, discuss whether Gregs admission in writing
amounts to valid promissory note?
3. Grant gives a post-dated cheque to Joanne who presents it for payment to the bank before
the due date and as a result same gets dishonoured; discuss whether Grant is liable u/s
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
4. A Bank wrongfully dishonoured Annies cheque and without any justification; discuss
whether A Bank is liable to compensate Annie for any loss or damage?
Page 14 of 23
Case no.4
1. Darshan and Prakash enter into an agreement, wherein Darshan sells his lawn-mover to
Prakash. But Darshan refuses to deliver it to Prakash till he has been paid fully by Prakash.
Before the full and final payment of the lawn-mover, Darshan lends the lawn-mover to
Prakash in order that Prakash may cut the grass. Bring out the rights of the buyer and the
seller.
2. Goods were sold and sent by the sellers at the request of the buyer to shipping agents of the
buyer and were put on board a ship by those agents. Subsequently, they were re-landed and
sent back to the sellers for the purpose of re-packing. While they were still in the possession
of the sellers for that purpose, the buyer became insolvent. The sellers refused to deliver
them to the Official Receiver except upon payment of the price. Are the sellers entitled to
refuse to deliver the goods to the Official Receiver? Discuss.
3. A particular hair dye was normally used to dye hair by a hair dresser. In fact, all the hair
dressers in the area commonly used that particular hair dye as it was considered the best.
Arun was allergetic to this particular hair dye. Yet, he got his hair dyed and as a result he
developed dermatitis because of that hair - dye. Arun claims that the hair dresser is liable to
compensate him because the hair dresser had not specifically asked him whether that
particular dye suits him or not. Discuss.
Page 15 of 23
Case no.05
1. An annual general meeting was called by a company in Dec. 2000. This meeting was
adjourned to
Annual General
company liable for an irregularity, while the directors claim that there is no such
irregularity. Discuss whether the registrar will succeed in his claim and be able to
take any action against the company.
validly constituted
company and the directors are also appointed as per the provisions of the act. The
directors have the power to enter into contracts on behalf of the company. They
entered into one such contract with Dharti Ltd. The common seal of a company was
affixed on the document without the compliance of the provisions of the companies
act. Can the document be said to be valid? What options are available with both the
companies, if at all the document is void? If it is void, Can the contract be ratified by
the Board of Directors?
3. Anand was the managing director and a shareholder of a company. The cheques
payable to the company were indorsed by him to himself in the capacity as a
managing director and deposited in personal account with the Bank of India. The
bank collected the money and allowed him to withdraw. The company soon went into
liquidation and the liquidators sue the bank for recovery of money of the cheques
payable to the company but credited to the account of Anand. Will the liquidator
succeed? Will Anand be able to claim any compensation from the bank or the
company?
Page 16 of 23
4. The shareholders of Camins Ltd. duly called upon the managing director to convene a
meeting. The agenda of the meeting was to move a motion removing the managing
director from his post. The managing director promised to fix up a meeting, but as he
was flying out for business reasons, requested to conduct the meeting after a week.
Later on the managing director failed to oblige them, hence the shareholders
themselves met at a place, away from the registered office. They passd a resolution
and removed the managing director from his post. The managing director claims that
this is not a valid resolution and that he cannot be removed on the basis of such a
resolution. Advice the shareholders as well as the managing director.
Page 17 of 23
Case no.06
1. A accepts a bill for the accommodation of B the drawer. The bill is dishonoured by A on
the due date and C, the holder of the bill, on that date, collects the amount from B.
a. Can B sue A for the recovery of the amount?
b. Will it make any difference, if the bill gets into the hands of the holder in due course
and he files a suit against A for the recovery of the amount?
Page 18 of 23
Case no.07
1. Mr. Sandesh filed a suit against the four DTH service providers alleging contravention of the
provision of the competition act 2002. He said that these four DTH service providers are
limiting competition amongst themselves forcing the buyers to buy bundled hardware and
creating entry barriers to new hardware manufacturers. To avail DTH services the customers
required 4 instruments besides television i.e. a small dish antenna, a control unit, a small
radio-size device and a smart user identifier card. Mr. Sandesh alleged that ideally the
antenna and the control unit\ should be available in the open market and the smart card and
radio-size device can be provided by the DTH provider. The DTH providers have put the
product into a bundle and also manipulated the devices such that one device shall not work
for more than one DTH provider. Also the customer is loath to buy another hard ware if he
wants to change the DTH service provider. Also the customers are made to sign an
agreement with the DTH service provider in which the onerous conditions are printed very
minutely and in an illegible way. This practice adopted by the DTH service providers results
in the inconvenience for the customers. These were the main allegations along with many
others. Discuss if you feel that the provisions of the competition act have been violated. State
valid reasons/provisions for your answers.
2. Company A issued a Limited tender notice for procuring cast steel bogies. Quotations were
received. Three big manufacturers quoted identical price of Rs. 77,000/- per bogie as against
other tenderers quoting between Rs. 83,000/- and Rs. 84,500/- per bogie. The tender
committee arrived at a rate of Rs. 76,000/- per bogie. Two of the big companies offered to
reduce their price substantially, if called for negotiation. Company A offered a counter-offer
of price of Rs. 65,000/- per bogie as against Rs. 76,000/- to others as some of them were sick
units. The Three big manufacturers filed a petition against this in the High Court. Discuss,
giving legal reasons if you feel that there has been any involvement of cartel, predatory
pricing, dual pricing, etc.
Page 19 of 23
Case no.08
Mr. Ramchand Bhagirath is a proprietor and a wholesale dealer of dry chillies, was from Gondia
and had a godown in a double storeyed building where he used to store large quantity of chillies.
The residents of Gondia in that area where the godown was situate, complained against this
godown as everyday lots of trucks came and loading/unloading of dry chillies used to take place.
This activity was continued since a long time and the physical comfort of the residents in that
locality were affected and it had become practically impossible for them to bear this any further.
They claimed that this activity caused pollution and was a threat to the health and physical
comfort of the residents in the locality. It caused a lot of sneezing, coughing, adthma, irritation of
skin and burning sensation. The residents thus took action against this particular businessman.
The proprietor though admitted that the building was being used as godown, refused that it
caused any harm or threat to the health of the people. Also the building was a pakka construction
and proper care was taken before and after loading and unloading activity so as to see that
pollution does not take place since 20 years. Discuss what should be done in the situation.
Page 20 of 23
Case no.09
1. Hawkins is a company who has got registered its artistic label under the Copyright Act.
Hawkins is a company dealing in pressure cookers. Another company, also dealing in
pressure cookers applied this copyrighted label on their cookers. The Hawkins cooker
company sought to get an injunction and a decree for taking accounts on the ground that
the other company has copied its copyright, it is also dealing in pressure cookers and as
such it is an infringement of the copyright. Is it a case of infringement of copyright?
Discuss at length will the Hawkins company succeed in its claim?
2. Raghunath is a writer of stories and has a number of stories on his name. Surendra is
another person who is also a writer but who also many a times bases his stories on the
ideas which can be gathered from the society. Both of them get their work copyrighted.
He has written stories based on the culture, the violence, the bomb blasts, etc. Raghunath
has written a story which tells us about the violence that is going on in the world. It is a
pure work of intelligence, based on the facts, circumstances and experience gained and
gathered by Raghunath. Surendra has recently written a story which involves a story
based on the bomb blasts in the city. Coincidentally this story seems similar to the story
of Raghunath and also is published after that of Raghunath. Raghunath claims that
Surendra has copied the material from his story and hence claims compensation from
Surendra. Surendra claims that his story is purely based on the bomb blasts that took
place in the city. Will Raghunath succeed in his claim?
3. A manufacturer of reengineered concrete poles and pipes, who held two patents in respect
of improved process of manufacture was doing business using the patented machinery.
The other person was infringing the patent of the manufacturer by using patented
machinery. The infringer was using patented machinery to manufacture concrete poles
and pipes and also was doing a good business. When the patent holder brought
Page 21 of 23
infringement action against the infringer and conducted search and inspection, of the
infringers premises, neither the patented machinery nor the products were found with the
infringer. However the infringer submitted that he was not infringing any patented
machinery but also promised that he will not make any use of the patented machinery in
the future also. The patent holder even so believes that there is some infringement being
committed and seeks a permanent injunction against the infringer in the court. Will the
patent holder succeed?
trademarks in which the syllable is the work CIBA in respect of various items falling in
different classes. Rakesh began manufacturing filters for motor c\vehicles and adopted
the trademark Cibaca and claimed that its use was bonafide and concurrent as the goods
in question belonged to a totally different class. Can the other manufacturer, i.e. Rakesh
be allowed to use the trade mark Cibaca? Will he succeed to get the registration of the
trademark on the basis of his claims? Will it be termed to be an infringement of the
trademark?
Page 22 of 23
Case no.10
Page 23 of 23