society
is
increasingly
becoming
rural-urban
the society. Yet the fact remains that the poor in the cities tend to
get concentrated in some residential localities thus providing an
ecological dimension to the phenomenon. For this reason, a slum
was initially defined basically in ecological terms, emphasizing the
unhygienic, dehumanizing and in sanitary conditions characterizing
it of course, with some cross national as well as inter city variations.
The slums do not only constitute merely ecological units but they
are significant reflection of the larger social structure being
sufficiently demonstrated. Just as a city cannot be understood as
entity isolated from the large social structure of which it is a part of
slum too would have little meaning if treated merely as an
ecological unit. Our cities tend to appear like an extension of the
rural community in so far as residential segregation of the poor and
socially under privileged sections of the society is concerned.
Physical separation between the poor and rich often leading to
social distance has characterized both our cities and villages. This
has often been treated as normal even by the planners, policy
makers, who while rehabilitating the poor further segregated them
residentially. How important can the repercussions be of residential
segregation of the poor still remains an untouched realm as far as
our urban planning is concerned.
Slums in cities have been found to be invariably inhabited by
the poorest of the poor, those at the bottom of social hierarchy and
also engaged in the dirtiest occupations irrespective of the level of
development of the society. Slums in India inhabited largely by the
urban poor were earlier labeled as areas of despair signifying
pessimism among those dwelling in them. Urban poor are not
hopeful of a better future and they lack high ambitions and
_________________________________________________________
Industrial & Economic Planning Division of TCPO
133
_________________________________________________________
Industrial & Economic Planning Division of TCPO
134
Slums in Lucknow
Urbanization has been accompanied by growth of population
and slums from the very inception of the urban world. Urbanization
is increasing at a rapid rate and available supply of land and
housing in the urban centers cannot accommodate the surging
squatter population. People are, therefore, illegally occupying land
and creating their own shelters, residing in the deplorable living
conditions. One of the varying problems confronting many of the
developing nations in the world today is the illegal occupation of
land-, which is generally called squatting. The population in these
areas increases at a much faster rate at two or three times the rate
of the urban population as a whole, while the health services,
employment opportunities and social services do not increase
correspondingly. As such, life style of many of the households
staying in these areas starts deteriorating, facing extremely difficult
conditions leading to anti-social elements and crimes and much
needs to be done to improve their predicament.
Rapid urbanization has led to an alarming deterioration in
the quality of the city dwellers in India. Our cities suffer from various
infrastructural deficiencies, poor sanitation and solid waste
disposal, water shortage, polluted natural water resources, water
logging in monsoons and other rainy seasons, frequent epidemics,
inadequate health care, depletion of green areas and ground water
level, poor roads and transportation, proliferation of slums and lack
of support for the social and economic development of the
disadvantaged mainly economically weaker sections of the society.
The aggregate impact of distress is especially debilitating for the
urban poor living in slums.
_________________________________________________________
Industrial & Economic Planning Division of TCPO
135
No
Identified/Estimated
Populations
&
Slum
Populations In Urban India and Uttar Pradesh
1981-2001
Year
Urban
Population (Lakh)
Slum
India
i.
1981
1594.6
279.1
17.5
ii.
1991
2176.1
462.6
21.3
iii.
2001
Uttar Pradesh
2909.4
618.3
21.3
i.
1981
199.0
25.8
13.0
ii.
1991
276.1
58.4
21.1
iii.
2001
365.4
77.1
21.1
It may be observed from Table 5.1 that more than one fifth of
the total urban population of India is staying in slums. In urban India
the slum population has increased from 279.1 lakh in 1981 to 618.3
lakh in 2001.
800
618.3
462.6
600
400
279.1
200
0
25.8
1981
58.4
1991
India
77.1
2001
UP
Years
1981-91
1991-2001
1981-2001
India
65.74
33.66
121.53
Uttar Pradesh
126.36
32.02
198.84
It may be inferred from Table 5.2 that the annual growth rate
of slum population in Urban Uttar Pradesh was higher than that of
the Urban India during last two decades and was observed at 3.8
per cent. The first decade recorded higher growth rate both in
Urban India and Urban Uttar Pradesh. In urban Uttar Pradesh the
annual growth during the first decade covered under the study was
_________________________________________________________
Industrial & Economic Planning Division of TCPO
139
at 12.6 per cent, while that of the urban India was only 6.6 per cent.
The highest growth rate of slum population during the decade 80s
may be due to the natural growth rate of population, the importance
of secondary and tertiary sectors, which provided larger share of
employment opportunities, the higher level of migration of
educated, skilled and semi skilled workers from the rural areas to
the urban areas, various other social reasons like movement of
family members from the rural to urban areas due to marriage and
other social ties, etc,. According to Census of India Cities classified
into Class I and Class II and others by the number of population.
The slum population of Uttar Pradesh during 1991 by classification
is presented in Table 5.3.
Table 5.3
No
1
2
3
Classification of Cities
Class I
Class II
Others
Total
Percentage Distribution
53.9
14.8
31.3
100.0
It may be observed from Table 5.3 that more than one half of
the slum population in Urban Uttar Pradesh in 1991 was in Class I
cities, 15 per cent of them in Class II and the remaining 31 per cent
of them in other cities. The higher percentage of slum population in
Class I cities may be due to the higher level of employment
opportunities, informal
sector opportunities,
etc,. The
slum
_________________________________________________________
Industrial & Economic Planning Division of TCPO
140
31.3
53.9
14.8
Class I
Class II
Others
Year
_________________________________________________________
Industrial & Economic Planning Division of TCPO
142
1
2
3
1981
1991
2001
UP
Total
Lucknow
UP
Slum
Lucknow
199.0
276.1
365.4
UA
10.07
16.69
22.58
5.06
6.04
6.18
25.8
58.4
77.1
UA
2.85
2.78
3.75
11.05
4.76
4.86
It may be inferred from Table 5.4 that only 6.2 per cent of the
urban population of Uttar Pradesh was in Lucknow UA during the
year 2001. During the last two decades the contribution of Lucknow
UA population to the total urban population of Uttar Pradesh has
increased more than one per cent, 5.06 per cent in 1981 to 6.18 per
cent 2001. On the contrary the proportion of slum population in
Lucknow UA had decreased from 11.05 per cent in 1981 to 4.86 per
cent in 2001, clearly reveals the fact that number of measures have
been undertaken by the local authorities especially Lucknow
Development Authority and Lucknow Municipal Corporation. The
information regarding the slum population of Lucknow UA during
the last two-decades is depicted in Figure 5.3.
Figure 5.3
3.75
3.5
3
2.5
2.85
2.78
2
1.5
1
0.5
_________________________________________________________
0
Industrial & Economic Planning Division of TCPO
143
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
No
1
2
3
Basic Services
Safe Drinking water
Electricity
Toilet
Sources:- 1.
2.
Uttar Pradesh
93.5
5.4
27.7
India
91.5
26.1
45.2
Details
Households Living in Slums
Slum Dwellers Living in Kutcha Houses
UP
9.53
29.17
Per cent
India
26.34
88.07
It may be observed from the Table 5.6 that more than one
fourth of the households in India were staying in slums.
As
It is only in this
stress,
depression,
defiant
social
behaviour, no
prop up the economy, but they also help the city governments make
services economical because the poor offer their labour at a very
nominal rate.
Economically
speaking, the urban poor makes the city living affordable and less
costly than it would be. But seldom do the not so poor care to help
them to make their living affordable.
In order to be more
That
government
and
its
staff
and
of
the
non-governmental
successful in some selected large cities. Some other cities are now
planning to undertake slum upgradation programmes along with
slum improvement programmes.
In order to attain
_________________________________________________________
Industrial & Economic Planning Division of TCPO
148