Anda di halaman 1dari 150

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 1
INTRODUCTION

SET -JU

Page 1

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
The transformation of Sri Kempegowdas 16th Century Garden City
Bangalore to todays Silicon Valley has been rapid. The city has grown from 21
Sqkm. in 1897 to 800 Sqkm. in 2013. The capital of Karnataka, Bangalore, is the
fifth largest city in the country, is the perfect blend of natural beauty man made
marvels of architecture and technology. The city is the second fastest growing in
the world after Mexico City.

The city which was originally developed as a garden city subsequently


became an administrative, industrial center and lately transformed itself into the
software hub of India. Bangalore city, which had an area of 28.85 sq. km in 1901,
had grown to 174.7 Sq. km in 1971 and presently it has expanded to nearly 800
Sq. km. The last three decades have witnessed rapid growth in the population of
Bangalore city. The city, which had a population of 29.14 lakh in 1981, has
currently reached a level of nearly 8.426 million in 2011. It is expected that the
population will be about 110 lakh by 2015. Traffic and other infrastructure has
become one of the key problems due to the rapid growth of the city. There were
hardly any high rise buildings. The population of the city exploded during the last
three decades. From a population of about 2.9 million in 1981, it is going to
surpass 12 million by 2022. Figure 1.1 shows the growth of population projected
as on 2022 in Bangalore. The value as on 2020 will be of the order of 121 lakhs

SET -JU

Page 2

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Fig 1.1

1.2 Key Map


The proposed grade separator is located in the western part of Bangalore City,
acts as a link between Magadi road and Basaveshwara nagar and is one of the
busiest stretches in the city. This junction attracts a lot of traffic throughout the
day as either side of the corridor is populated with establishments like Adyar
Anand Bhavan, Government Homeopathy College, A D Halli Park, and also welldeveloped Residential Areas like Vijaynagar, Govindrajnagar, Priyadarshini Layout,
K H B Layout , etc. fig 1.2 shows the key map of the proposed grade separator.

SET -JU

Page 3

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Fig 1.2

SET -JU

Page 4

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 2
Objectives and scope of study

SET -JU

Page 5

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 2
Objectives and scope of study
2.1 General
Junctions located in the Western Part of the City. The Project Junction along
Magadi Road connects with Outer Ring Road in the west at a distance of
about 2.2km away and with Chord Road in the east at a distance of about
1.5km away. The Junction is surrounded by Residential Layouts such as
Vijay Nagar, K. H. B. Colony, Govindaraja Nagar, Kamakshipalya, Prashant
Nagar Colony, Basaveshwara Nagar, etc. and Industrial Establishments like
Rajaji Nagar Industrial Town, Kamakshipalya Industrial Estate, etc.
The Primary Objectives of the Study are
To effectively and optimally manage Traffic at the Project Junction.
To conduct necessary Surveys and Investigations to arrive at Alignment
Alternatives for Traffic Improvement at the Project Junction.
To suggest Optimal and Feasible Junction Improvement Measures to
reduce travel time.
To improve the existing Junction to streamline Traffic Flow at Grade
Level.
To improve the Environmental Conditions near the Project Junction by
reducing Idle Time.
To reduce the Vehicle Operation Cost of the Road Users commuting
through this Junction.
To reduce Traffic Accidents at the Junction.

SET -JU

Page 6

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

To summarise, the Main Objective of the Study of this Junction is to offer to


the Road Users commuting through this Junction Comprehensive
Connectivity, Convenience, Comfort, Affordability, Safety and Aesthetics.

2.2 Project Scope


The Scope of the Study to be carried out involves the following.
Review of Available Data and Reports.
Topographical Survey of the Project Junction.
Necessary Traffic Survey to obtain Data and its Analysis for the Concept
Proposal.
Geotechnical Investigation.
Study of Alternative Solutions and Evaluation of the same.
Selection of Feasible Alternative.
Work out Traffic Management / Diversion and Traffic Engineering
Schemes.
2.3 Approach Methodology
The Activities that are involved in the Preparation of Detailed Project Report
for Construction of Underpass at the Junction of Magadi Road and
Basaveshwara Nagar Road, Bangalore are briefed below.

2.3.1 Stage 1
To define the Objectives and Scope of Work.
To plan Approach and Methodology, Data Collection.

Carry out Field Reconnaissance Survey that includes Site Appreciation,


Identification of Survey Locations and Site Constraints.

SET -JU

Page 7

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

2.3.2 Stage 2
Data Collection
Engineering Surveys and Investigations
1. Classified Turning Traffic Volume Survey.
2. Topographic Survey.
3. Geotechnical Investigation.
Secondary Data
1. Economic Indicators affecting Traffic Growth.
2. Details of any on going Road Improvements, Junction
Improvements, Grade Separator Schemes; Footpath Improvement
Scheme.
Analysis of Traffic Volume Count in deciding the Alignment of Grade
Separation Scheme.
Analysis of Surface Level Improvements based on the Traffic Data and
Proposed Grade Separation Scheme.
Analysis of Traffic Circulation at Surface Level based on Proposed
Scheme.
Design suitable Traffic Improvement Measures to reduce Conflicting
Traffic Stream.
Preparation of Layout Drawings and Longitudinal Sections of the
Proposals conceptualized.

2.3.3 Stage 3

Basic Engineering Designs, Drawings and Longitudinal


Sections of the Approved Concept.
Geometrical design.
Designing of Retaining wall of Underpass

SET -JU

Page 8

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Designing of Box Portion of Underpass

2.4 Design Philosophy


The Technical Proposal given in this Detailed Project Report
consists of four lanes divided bi directional Underpass along
Magadi Road, its Basic Engineering Designs and Drawings and all
relevant Technical Data / Details based on the Studies and
Investigations stated in Section 2.2.
The Design Standards that will be adopted in the Design of
Proposed Underpass at the Junction of Magadi Road and
Basaveshwara Nagar Road, Bangalore shall be in accordance with
the Codal Provisions of India as stipulated by the Indian Road
Congress (IRC), the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
(MoRT&H) and the Bureau of Indian Standard Specifications
(BIS). Deviations may be considered in Planning Parameters, if
absolutely necessary, considering the Dense Urban Conditions
from the present Codal Provisions. These Modifications in the
Design shall be adopted based on Sound Engineering Practices.
The Basic Engineering Designs and Drawings presented as part of
this Detailed Project Report are based on the Studies and
Investigations carried

SET -JU

Page 9

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

2.5 Approach Methodology

SET -JU

Traffic Survey

Designing of
Retaining wall

Geometrical
Design

Designing of
Box portion

Page 10

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 3
Site Characteristics

SET -JU

Page 11

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter 3
Site Characteristics
3.1 Junction Details Physical
The Junction of Magadi Road Basaveshwara Nagar Road is one of the
most important and busiest Junctions located on Magadi Road (SH 17E) in
the Western Part of the City. The Project Junction along Magadi Road
connects with Outer Ring Road in the west at a distance of about 2.2km
away and with Chord Road in the east at a distance of about 1.5km away.
The Junction is surrounded by Residential Layouts such as Vijay Nagar, K.
H. B. Colony, Govindaraja Nagar, Kamakshipalya, Prashant Nagar Colony,
Basaveshwara Nagar, etc. and Industrial Establishments like Rajaji Nagar
Industrial Town, Kamakshipalya Industrial Estate, etc. This is a typical three
legged (T Shaped) Intersection in which Magadi Road forms the East
West Axis and Road towards Basaveshwara Nagar forms the North Axis.
The Details of the Arms forming this Intersection are as follows.

SET -JU

Page 12

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

3.1.1 Arm (Magadi Road) towards Chord Road Side of the


Intersection
This part of the Road is divided bi directional with 0.3m wide Central
Median. The Carriageway Width of this Stretch varies between 20m and
21m whereas the ROW of this Road varies between 39m and 40m near the
Junction. Slip Road of average width of 9m is present on southern side of
this Stretch of Road. The Gradient is slopping away from the Junction.
Thickly Developed Commercial and Residential Establishments are present
on either side of this Stretch of Road.

3.1.2 Arm (Magadi Road) towards Outer Ring Road Side of the
Intersection
This Part of the Road is divided bi directional with 0.9m wide Central Median. The
Width of Carriageway varies between 21m and 22m whereas the ROW of this
Road varies between 35m and 36m near the Junction. Slip Road of average width
of 7m is present on southern side of this Stretch of Road. The Gradient is slopping
towards the Junction. Well Developed Commercial and Residential
Establishments, Public Service Buildings are present along this Stretch of Road.
Bus Stop is located on either side of this Stretch of Road at about 100m away from
the Junction.
SET -JU

Page 13

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

3.1.3 Arm towards Basaveshwara Nagar Side of the Intersection


This part of the Road is divided bi directional with 0.4m wide Central
Median. The Width of Carriageway varies between 15m and 16m whereas
the ROW of this Road is 24m near the Junction. The Gradient is slopping
towards the Junction. Either side of this Stretch is populated with thickly
developed Residential and Commercial Establishments.

3.2 Existing Traffic Regulations


Two directional movements are present along all the three arms of the
Junction. It is permitted to move from one arm to other two arms of the
Junction. There are Signals present at the Junction. At present the Traffic
Flow at the Junction is being controlled by Automated Traffic Signal
manned with Traffic Police Personnel.

3.3 Street Lighting Pattern


Road Side Street Lighting Arrangement along the Project Stretch is not
adequate. Hence, Provision of adequate Nos. of Street Lights along all the
Approach Arms to the Project Junction shall be incorporated in the Project
Proposal for the effective illumination.
3.4 Bus Stops
The presence of Bus Stops on the Intersecting Arm of the Junctions, four on
the Arm towards Outer Ring Road Side of the Intersection inside the
Carriageway hinders the smooth traffic movement along the Corridor near
the Junction.

3.5 Pedestrian Movement


The presence of Bus Stops, Educational Institutions, Hospital Building,
Commercial Establishments and their related activities in the vicinity of the
SET -JU

Page 14

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Junction leads to hazardous movement pattern of the Pedestrians across the


Road, thus reducing the Safety Aspects. Further, presence of Trees, other
Utilities and Hawkers Activities on the Footpath has reduced the Effective
Width of the Footpath and in turn is obstructing the Pedestrian Movement.

Chapter - 4
Field studies and Analysis

SET -JU

Page 15

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 4
Field studies and Analysis
4.1 General
This Chapter presents the various Studies (Reconnaissance Survey, Traffic
Survey, Topographical Survey, etc.) and thereafter the Data, obtained as a Result
of these Studies, Analysis carried out. The Results of Analysis form Inputs for
Planning and Design of Proposed Junction Improvement Scheme, Traffic Forecast
and Economic Analysis.

4.2 Reconnaissance Survey


Reconnaissance Survey has been carried out at and around the Project
Junction and the Physical Characteristics of the Junction such as Road Geometrics,
Pavement Structure, Traffic Controls (Signs, Signals, Road Markings and Parking
Restrictions), Side Walks, Shoulders, Adjacent Land Use, Service Lines (for
example Water, Electricity, Telephone), Storm Water Drains and the Intensity of
Non Traffic Activities, which encroach upon Road Space (such as Hawkers,
Builders Materials, Market Stalls, etc.) have been studied. The Data recorded have

SET -JU

Page 16

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

been detailed out in Chapter 3 Site Characteristics. At present no Improvement


Scheme has been taken up in and around Basaveshwara Nagar Road Junction.
4.3 Traffic Surveys
To establish the Vehicular Traffic Flow Characteristics such as Hourly Variation,
Composition, Peak Hour Flows at the Junction, Turning Movement Survey of
Vehicles at the Project Junction has been conducted on first week of April.

4.3.1 Methodology for Traffic Surveys


4.3.1.1 Turning Movement Survey of Vehicles at the Junction
24 hours Manual Traffic Counts have been conducted to cover all the Vehicular
Movements at the Junction. The Vehicle Classification System adopted for the
Study is given in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1
Vehicle Classification System
Motorised Traffic
Non Motorised Traffic
2 Wheelers, Auto Rickshaw,
Passenger Car: Car, Taxi and Jeep

Bicycle, Cycle Rickshaw, Animal


Drawn Vehicle, Hand Drawn Cart

Utility Vehicle: Van and Tempo


Bus
Truck

Mini Bus
Standard Bus
Light
Commercial
Vehicle (LCV)
Heavy
Commercial
Vehicle (HCV)

SET -JU

Page 17

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

The Turning Movement Survey has been conducted to obtain Information on Mode
wise and Direction wise Turning Movement of Traffic at the Intersection. The
Survey has been conducted for 24 hours (0600 hrs. to 0600 hrs.) covering Morning
and Evening Peak Hours.
Traffic Counting has been carried out manually in two twelve hour shifts by
trained enumerators, using Hand Tally. The Count Data have been recorded at 15
minute intervals using Hand Tallies and total per hour for each vehicle category
has been computed. The Traffic Volume Count Data has been processed using the
commonly used Spreadsheet Package. The processed Hourly Traffic Volume Data
has been compiled Direction wise.
The Peak Hourly Directional Vehicular Movement Data has been used to plan and
design the Improvement Scheme such as Grade Separation and At Grade
Intersection with Traffic Signals.

4.4 Analysis of Traffic Study Data


The Data and Pertinent Information collected from the Traffic Survey have been
analysed using the Utility Software Packages (MS Excel) to obtain the required
Information concerning Traffic Characteristics at the Intersection. Findings and the
brief Discussions thereon are presented in this Section.

4.4.1 Analysis of Turning Movement Count Data


Data have been processed on quarter hourly basis to establish the most appropriate
Peak Hours. Data collected from Survey have been computerised and analysed to
study Hourly Variation of Traffic, Peak Hour Flows, Traffic Composition, etc. and
are presented below. The Counts have been classified by Category of Vehicles and
by Direction of Movement. The various Vehicle Types having different Sizes and
Characteristics have been converted into Equivalent Passenger Car Units. The
SET -JU

Page 18

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Passenger Car Unit (PCU) Factors recommended by Indian Road Congress in


Guidelines for Capacity of Urban Roads in Plain Areas (IRC: 106 1990) have
been used. The same are detailed in Table 4.2
Table 4.2
Recommended PCU Factors for Various Types of Vehicles in Urban Roads
Sl. No.

Vehicle Type

Equivalent PCU Factors


% Composition of Vehicle
Type
Up to 10%

10%
above

Fast Vehicles

Two wheelers, Motorcycle or Scooter, etc.

0.5

0.75

Passenger car, Pick up Van

1.0

1.0

Auto Rickshaw

1.2

2.0

Light Commercial Vehicle

1.4

2.0

Truck or Bus

2.2

3.7

6
B

Agricultural Tractor Trailer


Slow Vehicles

4.0

5.0

Cycle

0.4

0.5

Cycle Rickshaw

1.5

2.0

Tonga (Horse drawn vehicle)

1.5

2.0

Hand Cart

2.0

3.0

and

4.4.2 Hourly Variation of Traffic


Hourly Variation of Vehicular Traffic Flow is presented in Fig. 4.1. The Hourly
Traffic Volume observed at the Junction varied in the range of 527 8243 PCUPH
SET -JU

Page 19

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

(Passenger Car Unit per Hour). Peak Hour Flows are observed during 0900 1000
hrs. in the morning (8243 PCU) and 1800 1900 hrs. in the evening (7876 PCU).
This Junction handles more than 5500 PCU / hr. for most part of the day (0700
2200 hrs.)

Fig.4.4.2
4.4.3 Direction wise Traffic
Peak Hour Direction wise Vehicular Traffic Flow is presented in Fig. 4.2 for the
Junction of Magadi Road and Basaveshwara Nagar Road. The Major Flow is along
Magadi Road in which Current Peak Hour Flow is 4301 PCU, which amounts to
52.18% of Junction Volume.

4.4.4 Traffic Composition


Composition of Traffic (on 24 hour basis) has been observed at the Junction and is
shown in Fig. 4.3. Share of Two Wheelers is high (32.44%). The Analysis of
Composition of Vehicles in the Traffic Stream at the Junction brings out the
following.
Passenger Vehicle Category: Two Wheelers along with Car / Jeep / Taxi and
Auto constitute 68.01% while Buses account for 7.74%.
SET -JU

Page 20

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

4.5 Topographic Survey


A Comprehensive Topographic Survey has been conducted using Total Station
Equipment to accurately map the Area and obtain the Present Information on Road
Width, Adjoining Land Use, Building Offsets and Levelling Data using Auto
Level. The GTS Bench Mark has been transferred to the Site by carrying out Fly
Levelling and the Bench Marks have been established at Site. The entire Levelling
has been carried out using GTS Bench Mark. The Profiles and Levels of the Road
Network within the Study Area have been also captured by taking Longitudinal
and Cross Section Levels. The Extent of Survey has been limited to 300m on all
the Approach Arms of the Junction and the Details have been captured adequately
for Planning and Designing of Grade Separation Scheme. The Data captured are in
3D Format, which could be directly downloaded to computers and compatible for
Modern Design Softwares. The Existing Site Features collected during
Topographical Survey are enumerated in Chapter 3 Site Characteristics.
SET -JU

Page 21

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

4.6. Traffic volume survey

Table 4.6.1
Traffic Volume at the Junction of Magadi Road and Basaveshwara Nagar Road,
Bangalore(MONDAY)
Fast Moving Vehicles
Ti
m
e
Pe
rio
d

08
00

09
00

Trucks
Dire
ctio
n

Auto

Car /
Jeep
/
Taxi

Van
/
Tem
po

Min
i
Bus

377

255

159

183

174

138

106

80

Two
Whe
eler

1-2

1-3

SET -JU

Slow Moving
Vehicles
Ani
ma
O
Total
l/
t
Vehicl
Ha Cycl h
es
nd
es
e
Dr
r
aw
s
n

Total
PCU

Bus

L
C
V

HC
V

117

193

1289

1822

85

584

782

Page 22

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

09
00
10
00

10
00
11
00

11
00

12
00

12
00

13
00

2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

394
298
155
373
1771

228
185
115
179
1100

249
129
93
166
902

176
98
89
174
800

147
74
61
53
537

234
0
0
1
429

3
0
1
1
8

3
1
0
0
4

0
0
0
0
0

1
0
0
0
3

0
0
0
0
0

1435
785
514
947
5554

2026
986
664
1098
7377

427

282

177

204

131

215

1447

2039

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

192
470
332
189
414
2024

154
259
196
124
202
1217

110
278
143
112
183
1003

89
196
110
99
194
892

97
150
82
68
59
587

4
261
2
0
1
483

0
4
2
2
1
14

0
3
3
0
0
8

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
2
3
2
0
12

0
0
0
0
0
0

647
1623
873
596
1054
6240

874
2262
1089
754
1225
8243

384

259

161

186

119

196

1310

1854

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

177
401
303
158
380
1803

140
232
188
117
182
1118

108
253
131
94
169
916

81
179
100
91
177
814

87
150
75
62
54
547

2
238
0
2
1
439

0
3
1
0
1
7

0
2
0
1
0
5

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
2
1
0
0
4

0
0
0
0
0
0

595
1460
799
525
964
5653

798
2060
1001
681
1117
7510

323

219

136

157

101

165

1108

1568

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

149
338
256
133
320
1519

118
196
159
99
154
945

91
214
110
80
143
774

68
151
84
76
149
685

73
126
63
52
46
461

3
201
0
0
0
369

0
2
1
0
0
6

0
1
0
0
0
3

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
2
0
0
2
7

0
0
0
0
0
0

503
1231
673
440
814
4769

674
1736
844
568
942
6332

271

183

114

132

85

139

928

1313

1-3

125

99

76

132

61

494

636

SET -JU

Page 23

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

13
00
14
00

14
00
15
00

15
00

16
00

16
00

17
00

2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

284
215
112
269
1276

164
133
83
129
791

179
93
67
120
649

57
127
71
64
583

106
53
44
38
387

169
1
0
0
310

1
0
0
0
3

0
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
2

0
0
0
0
0

960
623
377
620
4002

1383
766
485
727
5312

240

162

101

117

78

128

831

1181

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

111
251
190
99
238
1129

88
146
118
74
114
702

68
159
82
59
106
575

51
112
63
57
111
511

57
98
49
40
35
357

2
155
0
1
1
287

0
1
1
0
0
4

0
1
0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0
3

0
0
0
0
0
0

377
924
503
330
605
3570

508
1312
633
428
703
4765

245

126

138

113

92

151

870

1227

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

111
126
249
159
289
1179

51
106
120
103
234
740

45
125
79
82
156
625

26
80
85
67
143
514

69
106
58
48
42
415

2
184
1
0
1
339

0
0
0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
2
0
0
0
4

0
0
0
0
0
0

304
729
592
459
865
3819

412
1150
721
580
1078
5169

261

135

147

121

98

162

929

1312

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

119
135
266
170
309
1260

54
113
128
110
250
790

48
133
84
87
166
665

27
86
91
72
152
549

73
113
62
51
45
442

2
196
0
0
1
361

1
1
0
0
0
4

0
1
0
1
0
3

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0
0
0

324
778
631
491
923
4076

439
1230
767
621
1151
5519

307

158

173

141

116

190

1089

1539

1-3

140

64

56

32

86

379

512

SET -JU

Page 24

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

17
00
18
00

18
00
19
00

2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

158
312
199
362
1478

132
151
128
294
927

156
99
103
195
782

101
106
84
179
643

132
73
60
52
519

231
1
0
0
423

2
1
1
0
6

2
0
1
0
4

0
0
0
0
0

2
1
0
0
4

0
0
0
0
0

916
744
576
1082
4786

1446
906
728
1348
6479

352

182

199

162

133

218

1253

1769

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

160
182
358
228
416
1696

73
152
173
147
337
1064

64
179
113
118
224
897

37
116
122
96
205
738

98
152
84
69
60
596

3
265
0
0
1
487

1
1
0
2
0
7

1
2
0
1
1
6

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
2
1
6

0
0
0
0
0
0

437
1049
850
663
1245
5497

593
1659
1034
837
1552
7443

371

192

210

171

140

230

1325

1872

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al

169
191
378
241
439
1789

77
160
183
156
356
1124

68
189
120
124
237
948

39
122
129
102
216
779

104
160
88
72
63
627

3
279
1
3
1
517

2
4
1
2
0
12

0
3
2
0
1
10

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
2
2
1
0
10

0
0
0
0
0
0

463
1110
904
701
1313
5816

626
1753
1101
887
1637
7876

Table 4.6.2
Traffic Volume at the Junction of Magadi Road and Basaveshwara Nagar Road,
Bangalore(TUESDAY)
Ti
m
e
Pe
rio
d
08
00

09
00

Fast Moving Vehicles


Dire
ctio
n

1-2

SET -JU

Two
Whe
eler

Auto

345

277

Car
/
Jee
p/
Tax
i
165

Trucks

Van
/
Tem
po

Min
i
Bus

170

120

Bus

L
C
V

H
C
V

180

Slow Moving
Vehicles
Ani
mal /
Cy
Ot
Han
cle her
d
s
s
Dra
wn
0
2
0

Total
Vehi
cles

Total
PCU

1264

1816

Page 25

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

09
00
10
00

10
00
11
00

11
00

12
00

12
00

13
00

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

143
401
323
143
398
1753

140
266
156
170
192
1201

111
232
135
92
150
885

78
150
104
77
192
771

88
153
82
59
59
561

3
220
0
0
2
405

0
2
0
3
0
10

0
2
2
0
0
4

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
3
0
6

0
0
0
0
0
0

563
1427
802
547
993
5596

776
2043
978
751
1159
7523

420

288

155

210

123

221

1428

2027

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

186
501
320
193
420
2040

164
268
188
136
213
1257

127
234
153
127
176
972

77
201
123
85
176
872

103
142
92
53
63
576

6
271
2
0
2
502

0
5
1
3
2
17

0
2
1
0
0
5

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
2
2
3
12

0
0
0
0
0
0

664
1625
882
599
1055
6253

912
2267
1103
750
1240
8299

365

244

146

186

123

178

1247

1764

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

189
378
299
168
365
1764

165
232
156
112
189
1098

123
233
165
76
134
877

101
154
123
98
176
838

88
154
88
76
70
599

2
245
0
4
2
431

0
3
0
0
2
7

0
1
0
2
0
5

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
3
2
0
2
9

0
0
0
0
0
0

669
1403
833
536
940
5628

894
2020
1019
704
1124
7524

343

222

145

143

121

176

1158

1652

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

133
354
256
144
329
1559

133
202
144
111
143
955

86
222
98
92
154
797

77
145
77
82
143
667

68
132
55
65
49
490

5
193
0
0
0
374

0
3
2
0
0
9

0
2
0
0
0
3

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
3
0
1
1
9

0
0
0
0
0
0

503
1256
632
495
819
4863

690
1761
779
647
938
6467

266

176

122

138

90

123

917

1284

SET -JU

Page 26

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

13
00
14
00

14
00
15
00

15
00

16
00

16
00

17
00

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

132
298
198
121
154
1169

101
172
142
65
132
788

64
187
99
72
111
655

143
51
132
66
72
602

56
109
54
54
43
406

2
176
1
0
0
302

0
1
0
2
0
4

0
1
0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
2
1
0
1
4

0
0
0
0
0
0

498
997
627
380
513
3932

636
1437
785
480
658
5279

254

171

99

109

85

122

843

1199

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

121
234
187
109
243
1148

76
156
121
76
123
723

54
165
89
70
111
588

61
109
54
64
101
498

63
85
54
33
29
349

2
158
0
1
1
284

1
1
0
0
1
5

0
1
0
0
1
2

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
0
2
0
5

0
0
0
0
0
0

379
910
505
355
610
3602

503
1300
644
443
710
4799

254

133

143

121

102

143

899

1265

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

119
133
239
145
291
1181

45
98
132
98
154
660

56
112
85
91
139
626

31
76
72
75
151
526

76
111
55
54
32
430

3
179
1
0
2
328

0
0
0
0
0
2

0
0
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
1
0
0
3

0
0
0
0
0
0

331
710
585
463
769
3757

440
1122
724
590
891
5032

254

145

143

128

85

154

912

1281

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

123
145
221
187
293
1223

65
123
111
93
134
671

56
123
92
78
173
665

21
92
85
69
145
540

87
98
71
43
51
435

2
201
0
0
1
358

0
2
0
1
0
4

1
0
0
1
1
4

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1
2

0
0
0
0
0
0

355
784
580
472
799
3902

497
1230
721
571
923
5224

312

159

165

154

121

188

1102

1555

SET -JU

Page 27

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

17
00
18
00

18
00
19
00

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

154
134
320
176
354
1450

70
123
164
131
301
948

71
159
109
111
178
793

29
123
91
92
165
654

78
141
82
51
61
534

1
222
2
0
0
413

2
2
0
2
1
8

1
0
1
1
2
6

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
2
1
0
1
6

0
0
0
0
0
0

407
906
770
564
1063
4812

535
1431
955
714
1351
6541

343

178

201

171

121

221

1240

1743

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al
1-2

169
176
348
232
404
1672

65
165
182
156
321
1067

64
183
121
101
231
901

43
98
132
104
197
745

113
145
87
72
51
589

4
263
0
0
1
489

1
1
0
1
1
6

1
1
1
2
0
6

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
1
1
3
0
7

0
0
0
0
0
0

460
1033
872
671
1206
5482

625
1645
1072
856
1489
7430

356

193

198

182

151

231

1319

1884

1-3
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-2
Tot
al

181
198
178
231
419
1563

77
132
204
143
332
1081

73
199
112
133
212
927

43
131
134
98
211
799

98
153
93
65
76
636

3
281
1
2
2
520

3
3
2
2
1
13

1
3
1
0
2
10

0
0
0
0
0
0

1
3
2
1
3
13

0
0
0
0
0
0

480
1103
727
675
1258
5562

635
1709
1000
841
1580
7649

Table 4.6.3
Traffic Volume at the Junction of Magadi Road and Basaveshwara Nagar Road,
Bangalore(WEDNESDAY)
Fast Moving Vehicles

Ti
m
e
Pe
rio
d

Dir
ect
ion

08
00

12

SET -JU

Two
Wheele
r

Auto

365

265

Car
/
Jee
p/
Tax
i
134

Trucks
Van /
Tem
po

Min
i
Bus

Bus

LC
V

H
CV

178

125

193

Slow Moving
Vehicles
Ani C
mal / y
Ot
Han c
he
d
l
rs
Dra e
wn
s
0
2 0

Total
Vehicle
s

Total
PCU

1264

1819

Page 28

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


09
00

09
00
10
00

10
00
11
00

11
00
-

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

SET -JU

183

143

114

71

89

603

810

401

221

253

187

151

236

1456

2044

287

193

131

103

69

786

991

163

124

86

76

71

520

688

385

165

178

183

49

966

1095

1784

1111

896

798

554

431

5595

7446

434

272

183

198

141

213

1453

2046

189

164

121

76

88

646

874

465

265

261

211

143

264

1616

2256

340

201

139

99

88

876

1104

192

133

99

103

76

609

784

420

197

193

204

63

1081

1251

2040

1232

996

891

599

485

15

10

6281

8314

392

263

171

193

121

193

1
3
1

1339

1884

183

132

112

76

91

599

799

411

241

243

181

145

234

1458

2053

299

173

141

96

81

795

991

163

121

102

87

71

547

715

371

177

156

182

49

940

1087

1819

1107

925

815

558

434

5678

7529

322

222

143

145

97

163

1095

1550

Page 29

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


12
00

12
00
13
00

13
00
14
00

14
00
15

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

SET -JU

156

112

87

71

65

498

655

345

205

221

145

134

204

1262

1788

133

143

98

92

71

540

737

142

102

76

65

59

445

582

332

145

151

152

51

833

956

1430

929

776

670

477

372

4673

6267

265

191

121

141

91

141

954

1358

132

101

67

139

56

498

636

276

158

181

45

112

165

939

1361

221

141

88

131

61

644

804

98

89

59

79

54

380

511

251

134

131

72

41

629

749

1243

814

647

607

415

309

4044

5418

249

176

108

121

76

131

864

1227

119

93

71

63

63

412

554

243

138

163

109

101

156

913

1298

181

124

89

54

53

501

643

103

81

63

61

47

360

475

246

104

112

119

40

622

714

1141

716

606

527

380

293

3672

4912

239

132

123

120

87

154

860

1221

Page 30

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


00

15
00
16
00

16
00
17
00

17
00
18
00

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
1
2

SET -JU

109

62

51

31

78

335

468

132

90

131

69

113

187

723

1139

256

115

89

91

63

616

744

167

97

75

71

52

462

580

193

226

145

139

34

740

960

1096

722

614

521

427

347

3736

5113

254

143

154

133

101

165

952

1351

123

64

54

32

78

355

486

141

109

123

93

120

198

784

1239

253

134

78

81

54

601

738

178

103

93

75

60

510

642

303

259

172

159

51

947

1192

1252

812

674

573

464

366

4149

5648

312

163

167

153

121

187

1107

1563

134

67

61

42

91

398

542

165

143

145

97

138

229

922

1465

320

149

105

89

80

747

915

187

139

91

91

54

566

725

359

302

187

167

61

1076

1361

1477

963

756

639

545

419

4816

6572

339

192

186

149

141

215

1226

1760

Page 31

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

18
00
19
00

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al

171

79

71

43

109

480

653

189

161

183

121

143

267

1067

1676

345

181

121

131

78

858

1048

238

132

123

86

71

652

809

417

321

119

199

68

1129

1431

1699

1066

803

729

610

487

5412

7376

365

201

198

178

153

234

1337

1914

171

67

76

43

109

474

634

189

171

195

112

14

272

958

1428

367

176

112

134

99

896

1102

253

143

131

91

78

700

876

446

345

243

223

67

1328

1644

1791

1103

955

781

520

514

10

1
0

5693

7598

Total
Vehicle
s

Total
PCU

1216

1688

Table 4.6.4
Fast Moving Vehicles
Ti
m
e
Pe
rio
d

08
00
09

Trucks
Dir
ect
ion

12

SET -JU

Two
Wheele
r

365

Auto

Car /
Jeep
/
Taxi

Van
/
Tem
po

Min
i
Bus

Bus

LC
V

HC
V

240

162

175

85

185

Slow Moving
Vehicles
Ani
ma
l/
Cy Ot
Ha
cle her
nd
s
s
Dr
aw
n
0
2
0

Page 32

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


00

09
00
10
00

10
00
11
00

11
00
12
00

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
1
2

SET -JU

178

145

99

75

90

589

800

405

212

250

165

135

252

1430

2011

283

178

129

102

70

762

953

160

125

101

95

72

554

726

362

170

175

183

55

948

1096

1753

1070

916

795

507

440

10

5499

7274

436

271

189

215

130

254

1507

2132

183

150

125

75

97

637

864

483

265

285

183

142

249

1616

2233

352

205

135

116

85

902

1127

193

135

119

101

65

615

780

395

205

180

180

60

1023

1204

2042

1231

1033

870

579

514

12

11

6300

8340

401

300

150

174

125

205

1364

1964

165

135

98

95

90

586

791

385

245

265

171

151

251

1475

2109

298

192

145

110

78

828

1039

165

125

92

100

70

554

724

352

175

173

185

55

944

1098

1766

1172

923

835

569

461

10

5751

7725

319

220

135

142

111

160

1093

1560

Page 33

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

12
00
13
00

13
00
14
00

14
00

15
00

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

1-

SET -JU

51

110

84

60

82

395

596

342

185

215

135

135

190

1208

1700

250

163

117

95

68

694

877

138

101

89

82

59

469

606

323

161

135

129

39

792

920

1423

940

775

643

494

356

4651

6258

255

172

115

129

70

145

892

1261

132

98

78

135

65

509

653

285

159

185

65

111

155

961

1368

201

125

93

139

62

625

775

105

85

72

69

45

379

494

272

135

121

72

39

639

753

1250

774

664

609

392

303

4005

5304

245

160

108

115

70

119

823

1151

121

90

70

55

60

401

539

240

135

165

102

92

152

890

1259

185

120

85

59

52

504

639

102

75

65

57

45

346

452

252

106

99

121

52

632

740

1145

686

592

509

371

279

3596

4780

235

151

141

38

98

145

817

1203

105

52

48

29

78

316

440

Page 34

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

15
00
16
00

16
00
17
00

17
00

18
00

3
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13

SET -JU

135

117

135

85

99

195

767

1202

251

132

78

83

62

607

752

162

111

83

61

55

474

609

270

236

165

151

48

873

1103

1158

799

650

447

440

348

3854

5310

265

142

139

120

102

155

932

1319

132

55

45

28

75

341

459

140

140

130

85

104

201

802

1275

255

125

88

91

55

615

742

161

99

93

75

45

474

588

292

245

155

162

52

910

1148

1245

806

650

561

433

363

4074

5531

299

165

179

125

125

188

1087

1555

141

62

65

45

90

406

544

165

129

155

99

145

292

989

1603

322

163

109

110

78

788

969

203

131

95

85

65

583

744

365

295

186

185

55

1086

1356

1495

945

789

649

558

487

10

4939

6770

355

170

218

135

112

245

1240

1751

180

65

68

40

83

447

579

Page 35

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

18
00
19
00

21
23
31
32
Tot
al
12

13
21
23
31
32
Tot
al

175

165

190

105

145

265

1048

1663

351

172

110

125

88

846

1036

265

129

115

62

60

637

776

420

341

243

173

56

1239

1549

1746

1042

944

640

544

525

5457

7355

378

173

221

175

135

225

1319

1834

175

78

73

45

120

499

683

180

165

195

135

165

285

1134

1797

345

180

115

119

85

849

1048

263

145

120

111

65

713

878

445

349

245

232

60

1334

1647

1786

1090

969

817

630

522

17

5848

7887

Day 1

SET -JU

Page 36

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Hourly variation of traffic flow


9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000

Total PCU day 1

3000
2000
1000
0
0800 - 0900 - 1000 - 1100 - 1200 - 1300 - 1400 - 1500 - 1600 - 1700 - 1800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

Day-1 Hourly variation of Traffic flow(fig.4.6.1)

Day 2
Hourly variation of traffic flow
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000

Total PCU day 2

3000
2000
1000
0
0800 - 0900 - 1000 - 1100 - 1200 - 1300 - 1400 - 1500 - 1600 - 1700 - 1800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

Day-2 Hourly variation of Traffic flow(fig.4.6.2)

Day 3

SET -JU

Page 37

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Hourly variation of traffic flow


9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
Total PCU day 3

3000
2000
1000
0
0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

Day-2 Hourly variation of Traffic flow(fig.5)

Day 4
Hourly variation of traffic flow
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000

Total PCU day 4

3000
2000
1000
0
0800 - 0900 - 1000 - 1100 - 1200 - 1300 - 1400 - 1500 - 1600 - 1700 - 1800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

Day-2 Hourly variation of Traffic flow(fig.6)

SET -JU

Page 38

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 5
Designing

Chapter - 5
SET -JU

Page 39

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Design

Fig.5

5.1 Planning and Investigations


The Junction Improvement Scheme has been discussed in Detail in Chapter
6. Diversion of the Underground Services like Water, Sewer, Electricity,
etc., which will affect the Construction Activities will be programmed prior
to the Excavation Work.

5.2 General Arrangement

SET -JU

Page 40

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Care has been taken while designing so that the structure generally fulfills
the following requirements.
The Soundness of the Structure and its Durability are of the highest
standards.
Aesthetics is in harmony with the surroundings.
Speedy and Practicable Construction.
Economy in Construction.

5.3 Design Loads


1. Live Load
Live Load has been considered as per IRC: 6 2010.
2. Seismic Force
The Underpass has been designed for the Seismic Force as per the
Provisions of IRC: 6 2010.
3. Earth Pressure
The Soil Properties for Embankment like Dry Density of Soil 1.85 t /
0

cum.; Saturated Density 2.00 t / cum.; = 30 and c = 0 have been


considered for Estimation Purpose.
Saturated Density of the Backfill (minimum 2 t / cum) has been
considered for calculating Active Earth Pressure for Estimation
Purpose.
4. Temperature Range
For Design of Structure, to account for Temperature, the following Formula
has been considered.
(DL) = Lt,
SET -JU

Page 41

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


0

The value of t shall be 17 C.


Where = Coefficient of expansion or contraction
L = Length of the member
(DL) = Expansion / Contraction due to Temperature Variation in Appropriate
Units.
The Super Structure has been designed for Effects of Distribution of Temperature
across the Deck Depth as per the relevant Codal Provisions. For Calculation,
Thermal ForceEffect (E) of 50% of the Insulation Value has been considered so
that to account for Effect of Creep on Thermal Strain.
5.4 Design of Underpass
5.4.1 General
The Length of the Underpass has been determined based on the Depth of
Deck Slab, where a minimum Vertical Clearance of 5.5m has to be provided.
By considering the Economy of the Project, Open Cut System has been
considered both for Ramp and Covered Portion of the Underpass. The
Covered Portion of the proposed Underpass has been designed as Cast in
Situ RCC Closed Box Section. For Approaches and Open Box,
Conventional RCC Retaining Structure has been adopted.
5.4.2 Foundation
a. Retaining Walls
The Retaining Walls for the Approaches have been proposed to be of RCC
appropriate with the Site Conditions. The Depth of the Foundation shall
be determined based on the Soil Investigation Report. Maximum
Settlement allowed is 10mm. Adequate Protection shall be given to
Reinforcement against Corrosion.
b. Concrete Grade
SET -JU

Page 42

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Closed and Open Portions of the Underpass including Retaining Walls shall be
of minimum M35 Grade Ready Mix Concrete.
5.4.3 Joints
5.4.3.1 Expansion Joint
Expansion Joint in Covered and Open Portions of the Underpass has been
considered at every 30m interval and also at the Junction of Wall and Slab at
top and bottom with size 12mm X 25mm with Gun Grade Polysulphide
Elastomeric Joint Sealant over a Bitumen Pad fixed in the Joints, applying
the Joints with NITOSEAL Primer or equivalent, including Preparation of
Surface, Primer Coat, Finishing Cost of all Materials, Labour including Cost
of Bitumen Pad.
5.4.3.2 Contraction Joint
Contraction Joint will be provided along the Pavement in the Underpass as per the
Design approved by the Engineer.
5.4.4 Crash Barriers
Concrete Crash Barriers shall conform to Clause 809 of MoRT&H Specifications.
The Height of the Concrete Crash Barrier is 1000mm above the Finished Road
Level. It has been designed to resist an Impact of 30t Axle Loads.
5.4.5 Wearing Coat
Wearing Coat conforming to Clause 2702.1 of MoRT&H Specifications for
Road and Bridge Works (Latest Edition) has been provided for Smooth
Riding Surface.
5.4.6 Approach Slab
The Approach Slab conforming to Clause 2704 of MoRT&H Specifications
for Road and Bridge Works (Latest Edition) has been provided.
5.5 Durability
From the Durability Consideration, the following minimum Grades of
Concrete are to be considered for Plain Cement Concrete (PCC) and
Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC).
a. Minimum Grade of Concrete shall be as below.
SET -JU

Page 43

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

PCC for Levelling Course M15


RCC for Open Foundation, Substructure and Superstructure M35
b. Minimum Cement Content, Diameter of Bar and Cover Requirements
For PCC and RCC, the value given below regarding minimum Cement
Content and maximum Water Cement Ratio shall be followed.
The minimum Nominal Diameter of Reinforcement is 8mm.
5.6 Drainage
Drainage of Storm Water collected in the Underpass and at Surface Level
Roads are essentially based on
IRC: SP: 42 1994 Guidelines on Road Drainage.
IRC: SP: 50 1999 Guidelines on Urban Drainage.
The Drainage Spouts conform to Clause 2705 of MoRT&H Specifications.
5.7 Traffic Signs, Markings and other Road Appurtenances
Traffic Signs, Markings and other Road Appurtenances shall conform to
Clause 800 of the MoRT&H Specifications for Road and Bridges (Latest
Edition). Road Markings shall conform to IRC: 35 1997 and Road Signs
shall confirm to IRC: 67 2012.
5.8 Medians, Kerbs and Footpaths
Medians, Kerbs and Footpaths shall conform to Clause 407, 408 and 409 of the
MoRT&H Specifications for Road and Bridges (Latest Edition).
5.9 Lighting
The Lighting within the Covered and Open Portion of Underpass, Slip Roads,
Junction at Surface Level over the Covered Portion of Underpass, etc. has been
provided as per relevant Codal Provisions. The Illumination proposed is an average
40 lux throughout.

SET -JU

Page 44

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

5.9.1 Designing of Retaining walls


What are retaining walls?
Retaining walls are soil structure systems intended to support earth back fills

Some of the types of retaining wall


Gravity retaining wall
Semi-gravity retaining wall
Cantilever retaining wall
Counterfort retaining wall

Basic Principles of Cantilever wall


Cantilever walls are made of reinforced concrete, and come in different
geometries.
Rely on their self-weight to resist sliding & overturning, but derive part of
their stability from the weight of backfill above the heel of the wall. Basic
principles of cantilever wall

SET -JU

Page 45

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

(fig 5.9.1)

SET -JU

Page 46

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Typical dimension of Cantilever Retaining wall

(fig.5.9.2)
External stability
In analyzing or designing for external stability, all the forces acting on
the structure are considered. These forces include lateral earth pressures,
the self-weight of the structure, & the reaction from the foundation soil.
The stability of the wall is then evaluated by considering the relevant
forces for each potential failure mechanism.
The wall has to stable against
Sliding FS>1.5
Overturning FS>2.0
Bearing failure FS>1.5
SET -JU

(fig 10)
Page 47

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

SET -JU

Page 48

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Retaining walls of Underpass


Underpass consists of eight Retaining walls and the of all the eight
Retaining walls are shown below
Designing of retaining wall R1
Problem :Density of soil =20KN/m
= 30
= 0
= 20
= 90

SET -JU

Page 49

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

SBC = 350KN/m
Ka = (1-sin)/(1+sin)=0.33
Kp = (1+sin)/(1-sin)=3
SET -JU

Page 50

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Design constant
fck = 30 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
cbc =7.5(IRC 21-2000 Tab-9)
st = 200(IRC 21-2000Tab-10)
modular ratio m = 280/3cbc = 12.44
Co-efficient of N.A K= (mcbc)/(mcbc+st) =
co-efficient of Leq Arm j =1-

=1-

=0.893

co-efficient of moment of resistance R= cbc Kj


=0.5*7.5*0.318*0.893
=1.06
Stability Analysis
To calculate BM
Earth pressure
Ph= KaH
=0.5*0.33*20*(2.75)
=25KN
M=Ph*
=25*
=22.9KN-m
Surcharge pressure
Ph = KaqH
SET -JU

Page 51

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

q=1.2*20[IRC-6-2000 Cl 217.1]
= 24 KN/m
Ph= 0.33*24*2.75
= 21.78 KN
M = Ph*
= 29.94 KN-m
Total over turning movement
M = 22.9+29.94
= 52.84 KN-m
Total pressure Ph = 25+21.78
= 46.78 KN
Item

Stem
Rectangle
Triangular
Base slab
Earth filling
Above heel
Super imposed
Load

Load in
(KN)

Distance from
Toe
(m)
0.8+(0.2/2)=0.90

1*0.2*2.45*25=
12.25
(1/2)*0.1*2.45*25= 0.8+0.2+(0.1/2)=
3.0625 KN
1.05
2.5*0.3*1*25=
(2.5/2)=1.25
18.75 KN
1*1.4*2.45*20 =
0.8+0.3+(1.4/2) =
68.6 KN
1.8
1*1.4*24=
0.8+0.3+(1.4/2)=
33.6 KN
1.8
W=136.26

BM
(KN-m)
11.25
3.21
23.43
123.48
60.48
M=221.85

Check Against overturning :FOS = (MR/M)=

SET -JU

= 4.19 > 1.44(safe)

Page 52

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Check against sliding


FOS = (/Ph) =

= 1.45 1.44(safe)

Let ((MR-M)/ =

= 1.24

Eccentricity e = (b/2)-
=

-1.24

= 0.01 <

=0.41 (ok)

max,min = (/b)[1(6c/b)]
=

[1

max = 54.78 KN/m < SBC (350 KN/m) (ok)


min = 52.21 KN/m > 0 (ok)

Design of Stem
Earth pressure Ph =

*Kah2 = 0.5*0.33*20*2.452 = 19.8 KN

MEp =19.8 *
SET -JU

= 16.1KN-m
Page 53

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Surcharge pressure Ph = Kaqh = 0.33*24*2.45 = 19.4 KN


Msp = 19.4*

= 23.76 KN-m

Total moment = MEP+Msp


M = 16.1+23.76
= 39.86 KN-m
Mn = 39.86*1.5
= 59.79 KN-m
Check for depth
Mn = 0.138 fCK bd2
59.79*106 = 0.138*30*1000*d2
d = 120mm < 200mm (safe)
(Mn/bd2) =

*106
=2.65

Assume clear cover 50mm


D = 200mm
d= 200-50 = 150mm

From Sp-16,Table-4
Pt = 0.689
Ast =

*1000*150

= 1033.5

for #12mm
Spacing =

*1000

= 109.43 mm
Provide #12mm Spacing @ 100mm c/c
SET -JU

Page 54

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Curtailment of Bars
Curtail by 50%
)2 = 0.5

h = 1.94 m
actual cut off = h-Ld
Ld = 50 = 50*
= 600 mm
Cutoff = 1.94-0.6
= 1.34 m From Top
Provide Spacing #12 mm @ 200 mm c/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =
=

*b*D
*1000*200

= 300mm2
for # 8mm2 Spacing = (((8)2/4)/240) *100 = 209.44mm
Provide Spacing 38mm @200mmc/c
Check for Shear
v = (Vn/bd) =
= 0.392 N/mm2

tab 19,PP73 IS456-2000


c = 0.59 N/mm2
Hence v < c (safe)
SET -JU

Page 55

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Design of Toe Slab

M1 = [0.8*0.3*1*25]

(self Wt)

M2 = [0.8*53.95*1]

(moment clue to upward

pressure)
M3 = [ *0.8*0.83*1]

(moment clue to upward pressure)


[M]=15.03 KN-m

Mn = 15.03*1.5 = 22.54 KN-m


SET -JU

Page 56

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

*106 = 0.36
from Sp-16
Pt = 0.0842
Ast =
= 210.5 mm2
for # 10mm spacing =

*102*1000

Hence provide spacing # 10@ 190 mmc/c


Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*300 = 360 mm2

Spacing for #10mm =

*102 = 218 mm

Provide spacing # 10 @ 200mm c/c


Check for shear :
v = (Vn/bd)
Vu = [(0.8*0.3*1*25)-(0.8*53.95*1)+(0.5*0.8*0.83)]
= 56.25 KN
v =

*103 = 0.22 N/mm2


=

c = 0.29 (IS456-2000,PP73)
Hence u < c (safe)
Design of Heel slab

SET -JU

Page 57

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

M1= 1.4*52.1

Upward pressure

M2=

Upward pressure

M3= 1.4*0.3*25

Soil over Burden pressure

M4= 1.4*2.45*20

Self wt

M5=1.4*24*

Surcharge load

*1.4*1.43

64.77 KN-m
M = 64.77 KN-m
(M2/bd2)=

*106 = 1.55

from Sp-16 Pt = 0.381


SET -JU

Page 58

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Ast =

*1000*250

= 952.5 mm2
Spacing for #10mm =

*1000
= 82.41 mm

provide spacing #10 @ 75 mm c/c

Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*300

Ast = 360 mm2


Spacing for Shear :
*103=0.23 N/mm2

v = (vn/bd)=
=

as per PP- 73, IS456-2000


c = 0.458
v < c
(safe)

Designing of retaining wall R2


Density of soil =20KN/m
= 30
= 0
= 20
SET -JU

Page 59

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

= 90

SBC = 350KN/m
Ka = (1-sin)/(1+sin)=0.33
Kp = (1+sin)/(1-sin)=3
Design constant
fck = 30 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
cbc =7.5(IRC 21-2000 Tab-9)
st = 200(IRC 21-2000Tab-10)
modular ratio m = 280/3cbc = 12.44
Co-efficient of N.A K= (mcbc)/(mcbc+st) =
SET -JU

Page 60

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

co-efficient of Leq Arm j =1-

=1-

=0.893

co-efficient of moment of resistance R= cbc Kj


=0.5*7.5*0.318*0.893
=1.06
Stability Analysis
To calculate BM
Earth pressure
Ph= KaH
=0.5*0.33*20*(3.75)
=47.65KN
M=Ph*
=47.55*( 3.8 3 )
=60.35KN-m
Surcharge pressure
Ph = KaqH
q=1.2*20[IRC-6-2000 Cl 217.1]
= 24 KN/m
Ph= 0.33*24*3.8
= 30.096 KN
M = Ph*
= 30.096*(3.82)
57.18 KN-m
SET -JU

Page 61

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Total over turning movement


M = 57.18+60.35
= 117.53 KN-m
Total pressure Ph = 47.65+30.096
= 77.746 KN
Item

Load in
(KN)

Stem
Rectangle
Triangular
Base slab
Earth filling
Above heel
Super imposed
Load

Distance from
Toe
(m)
0.8+(0.2/2)=0.90

1*0.2*3.4*25=
17
(1/2)*0.15*3.45*25= 0.8+0.2+(0.15/2)=
6.375 KN
1.075
2.95*0.4*1*25=
(2.95/2)=1.475
29.5 KN
1*1.8*3.4*20 =
0.8+0.35+(1.8/2) =
68.6 KN
2.05
1*1.8*24=
0.8+0.35+(1.8/2)=
43.2 KN
2.05
W=218.475

BM
(KN-m)
15.3
6.853
43.5
43.5
250.92
M=355.13

Check Against overturning :FOS = (MR/M)=

355.13
= 3.02 > 1.44(safe)
117.53

Check against sliding


FOS = (/Ph) =

0.5 * 218.475
= 1.4 1.44(safe)
77.745

Let ((MR-M)/ =

355.133 117.53
= 1.08
218.475

Eccentricity e = (b/2)-
=

SET -JU

2.95
-1.08
2

Page 62

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

= 0.395 <

b
=0.491 (ok)
2

max,min = (/b)*1(6e/b)+
=(

218.475
) [1
2.95

6 * 0..395
]
2.95

max = 133.55 KN/m < SBC (350 KN/m) (ok)


min = 14.56 KN/m > 0 (ok)

Design of Stem
Earth pressure Ph =

*Kah2 = 0.5*0.33*20*3.42 = 38.14 KN

MEp =38.14 *

3 .4
= 42.23KN-m
3

Surcharge pressure Ph = Kaqh = 0.33*24*3.4 = 26.92 KN


Msp = 26.92*

3 .4
= 45.76 KN-m
2

Total moment = MEP+Msp


M = 43.23+45.76
= 88.99 KN-m
Mn = 88.99*1.5
= 133.48 KN-m
SET -JU

Page 63

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Check for depth


Mn = 0.138 fCK bd2
133.48*106 = 0.138*30*1000*d2
d = 180mm < 200mm (safe)

(Mn/bd2) =

133.48
*106
1000 *150 *150

=5.93

Assume clear cover 50mm


D = 200mm
d= 200-50 = 150mm

From Sp-16,Table-4
Pt = 1.13
Ast =

1.13
*1000*150
100

= 1695

for #12mm
Spacing =

12 *12 * 0.7854
*1000
1695

= 66.72 mm
Provide #12mm Spacing @ 100mm c/c
Curtailment of Bars
Curtail by 50%
(

h 2
) = 0.5
3 .8

h = 2.68 m
actual cut off = h-Ld
SET -JU

Page 64

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Ld = 50 = 50*
= 600 mm
Cutoff = 2.68-0.6
= 2.08 m From Top
Provide Spacing #12 mm @ 200 mm c/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =
=

*b*D
*1000*200

= 300mm2
for # 8mm2 Spacing = (((8)2/4)/240) *100 = 209.44mm
Provide Spacing 8mm @200mmc/c
check for Shear
v = (Vn/bd) =

(138 .14 26 .92 ) * 1.5


(1000 * 150 )

= 0.650 N/mm2
100 Ast 100 *1615.68

1.07
bd
1000 *150

tab 19,PP73 IS456-2000


c = 0.67 N/mm2
Hence v < c (safe)

SET -JU

Page 65

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Design of Toe Slab


0.8
] 1.6
2

M1 = [0.8*0.4*1*25] [
M2 = [0.8*101.58*1] [

0.8
] 16.20
2
2
3

M3 = [ *0.8*32.27*1] [ * 0.8] 6.88

(self Wt)
(moment clue to upward pressure)

(moment clue to upward pressure)

[M]=24.68 KN-m
Mn = 24.68*1.5 = 37.02 KN-m
Mn
37.02
*106 = 0.59

bd * d 100 * 250 * 250

from Sp-16
Pt = 0.1386
Ast =

0.1386
*1000 * 250
100

= 346.5 mm2
for # 10mm spacing =

0.78
*102*1000
346.5

Hence provide spacing # 10@ 120 mmc/c


Distribution of Steel
SET -JU

Page 66

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Ast =

*1000*400 = 480 mm2

Spacing for #10mm =

0.75 *1000
*102 = 163.5 mm
480

Provide spacing # 10 @ 150mm c/c


Check for shear :
v = (Vn/bd)
Vu = [(0.8*0.4*1*25)-(0.8*101.28*1)+(0.5*0.8*32.27)]
= 90.174 KN
v =

90.174
*103 = 0.36 N/mm2
1000 * 250
100 * 940
0.26
1000 * 350

c = 0.26 (IS456-2000,PP73)
Hence u < c (safe)
Design of Heel slab
1.8
] 23.58
2

M1= 1.8*14.56 [

M2=

1.8
] 31.34
3

*1.8*58.04 [

Upward pressure

Upward pressure

1.8
] 16.2
2

Soil over Burden pressure

1.8
] 110.16
2

Self wt

Surcharge load

M3= 1.8*0.4*20 [

M4= 1.8*3.4*20 [

1.8
] 38.88
2

M5=1.8*24* [

220.16 KN-m
M = 220.16*1.5=330.24 KN-m
SET -JU

Page 67

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

(M2/bd2)=

33.024
*106 = 2.69
1000 * 350 * 350

from Sp-16 Pt = 0.701


Ast =

0.701
*1000*350
100

= 2453.5 mm2
Spacing for #10mm =

78.5
*1000
2453.5

= 32.01 mm
provide spacing #10 @ 50 mm c/c

Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*400

Ast = 480 mm2


Check or Shear :
v = (vn/bd)=

157.74
*103=0.45 N/mm2
1000 * 350

100 * 2616.66
0.747
1000 * 350

as per PP- 73, IS456-2000


c = 0.588
v < c (safe)

Designing of retaining wall R3


Density of soil =20KN/m
= 30
SET -JU

Page 68

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

= 0
= 20
= 90

SBC = 350KN/m
Ka = (1-sin)/(1+sin)=0.33
Kp = (1+sin)/(1-sin)=3
Design constant
fck = 30 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
cbc =7.5(IRC 21-2000 Tab-9)
st = 200(IRC 21-2000Tab-10)
modular ratio m = 280/3cbc = 12.44
Co-efficient of N.A K= (mcbc)/(mcbc+st) =
co-efficient of Leq Arm j =1SET -JU

=1-

=0.893
Page 69

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

co-efficient of moment of resistance R= cbc Kj


=0.5*7.5*0.318*0.893
=1.06
Stability Analysis
To calculate BM
Earth pressure
Ph= KaH
=0.5*0.33*20*(4.6)
=69.82KN
M=Ph*
=69.82*

4 .6
3

=107.069KN-m
Surcharge pressure
Ph = KaqH
q=1.2*20[IRC-6-2000 Cl 217.1]
= 24 KN/m
Ph= 0.33*24*4.6
= 36.43 KN
M = Ph*
= 83.79KN-m
Total over turning movement
SET -JU

Page 70

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

M = 107.069+83.79
= 180.85 KN-m
Total pressure Ph = 69.82+36.43
= 106.258 KN
Item

Load in
(KN)

Stem
Rectangle
Triangular
Base slab
Earth filling
Above heel
Super imposed
Load

Distance from
Toe
(m)
0.8+(0.2/2)=0.90

1*0.2*4.2*25=
21
(1/2)*0.25*4.2*25= 1+0.2+(0.25/2)=
13.125 KN
1.325
3.5*0.4*1*25=
(3.35/2)=1.675
33.5 KN
1*2.1*4.2*20 =
0.8+0.45+(2.1/2) =
176.4 KN
2.3
1*2.1*24=
0.8+0.45+(2.1/2)=
50.4 KN
2.3
W=294.425

BM
(KN-m)
18.9
17.39
56.1125
405.72
115.92
M=614.0425

Check Against overturning :FOS = (MR/M)=

614.0425
= 3.21 > 1.44(safe)
190.859

Check against sliding


FOS = (/Ph) =

0.5 * 294.425
= 1.38 1.44(unsafe)
106.25

Therefore provide shear key


Let ((MR-M)/ =

614.0425 190.859
= 1.43
294.425

Eccentricity e = (b/2)-
=

SET -JU

3.35
-1.43
2

Page 71

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

= 0.245 <

=0.41 (ok)

max,min = (/b)[1(6c/b)]
=(

294.425
) [1
3.35

6 * 0.245
]
3.35

max = 126.45 KN/m < SBC (350 KN/m) (ok)


min = 49.32 KN/m > 0 (ok)

Design of Stem
Earth pressure Ph =

*Kah2 = 0.5*0.33*20*4.22 = 58.212 KN

MEp =58.212 *

4 .2
= 81.49KN-m
3

Surcharge pressure Ph = Kaqh = 0.33*24*4.2 = 33.26 KN


Msp = 33.264*

4 .2
= 6985KN-m
2

Total moment = MEP+Msp


M = 81.49+69.85
= 151.35 KN-m
Mn = 151.35*1.5
SET -JU

Page 72

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

= 227.026KN-m
Check for depth
Mn = 0.138 fCK bd2
227.026*106 = 0.138*30*1000*d2
d = 234mm < 200mm (unsafe)
section is under reinforced
assume depth=450mm
d=450-50=400mm
(Mn/bd2) =

227.02
*106
1000 * 400 * 400

=1.41
From Sp-16,Table-4
Pt = 0.346
Ast =

0.3446
*1000*400
100

= 1378.4
for #12mm
Spacing =

12 * 12 * 0.7154
*1000
1378.4

= 82.049 mm
Provide #12mm Spacing @ 100mm c/c
Curtailment of Bars
Curtail by 50%
(

h 2
) = 0.5
4 .6

h = 3.25 m
actual cut off = h-Ld
SET -JU

Page 73

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Ld = 50 = 50*30
= 1500 mm
Cutoff = 3.25-1.5
= 1.75 m From Top
Provide Spacing #12 mm @ 200 mm c/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =
=

*b*D
*1000*450

= 540mm2
for # 8mm2 Spacing = (((8)2/4)/250) *100 = 200mm
Provide Spacing 8mm @200mmc/c
check for Shear
v = (Vn/bd) =

(58 .212 33 .264 ) * 1.5


(1000 * 400 )

= 0.34 N/mm2
100 Ast 100 * 1130.9

0.28
bd
1000 * 400

tab 19,PP73 IS456-2000


c = 0.38 N/mm2
Hence v < c (safe)

SET -JU

Page 74

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Design of Toe Slab


M1 = [0.8*0.4*1*25] [
M2 = [0.8*97.67*1] [

0.8
] 3.2
2

0.8
] 31.25
2
2
3

M3 = [ *0.8*10.36*1] [ * 0.8] 2.21

(self Wt)
(moment clue to upward pressure)

(moment clue to upward pressure)

[M]=30.26 KN-m

Mn = 30.26*1.5 = 45.39 KN-m

Mn
45.39
*106 = 0.37

bd * d 100 * 350 * 350

from Sp-16
Pt = 0.0864
Ast =

0.0864
* 1000 * 350
100

= 302.4 mm2
for # 10mm spacing =
SET -JU

0.78
*102*1000=259.5
302.4

Page 75

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Hence provide spacing # 10@ 130 mmc/c


Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*400 = 480 mm2

Spacing for #10mm =

0.785 * 1000
*102 = 163.35 mm
480

Provide spacing # 10 @ 200mm c/c


Check for shear :
v = (Vn/bd)
Vu = [(0.8*0.4*1*25)-(0.8*97.67*1)+(0.5*0.8*10.36)]*1.5
= 99.34 KN
v =

99.34
*103 = 0.283 N/mm2
1000 * 350

100 * 301.9
0.086
1000 * 350

c = 0.29 (IS456-2000,PP73)
Hence u < c (safe)
Design of Heel slab
M1= 2.1*49.32 [

M2=

2.1
] 108.75
2

*2.1*48.35 [

2.1
] 35.53
3

M3= 1.4*0.4*25 [

2.1
] 22.05
2

M4= 2.1*4.2*20 [

2.1
] 185.22
2

M5=2.1*24* [
SET -JU

2.1
] 52.92
2

Upward pressure

Upward pressure

Soil over Burden pressure

Self wt

Surcharge load
Page 76

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

115.91 KN-m
Mu = 173.865 KN-m
(M2/bd2)=

173.865
*106 = 1.419
1000 * 350 * 350

from Sp-16 Pt = 0.3469


Ast =

0.3469
*1000*350
100

= 1214.15 mm2
Spacing for #10mm =

78.5
*1000
1214.5

= 64.65 mm
provide spacing #10 @ 75 mm c/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*400

Ast = 480 mm2


spacing for #10mm=

78.5 * 1000
=163.5mm
480

provide spacing #10mm @ 200mmc/c

check for Shear :


v = (vn/bd)=

93.53
*103=0.267 N/mm2
1000 * 350

100 * 1046
0.298
1000 * 350

as per PP- 73, IS456-2000


c = 0.3449
v < c (safe)
Design of shear key
SET -JU

Page 77

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Pressure at phase of toe


=159.1
Co-eff of passive earth pressure=kp=3
If a is a projection of shear key resistance offered by passive
Earth pr= kp*verticle pr
=3*108.030
=324.09a
w pp
Therefore FOS against F2= p

97.7592=324.09a+132.49
a=0.107m

Designing of retaining wall R4


Density of soil =20KN/m
= 30
= 0
= 20
= 90

SET -JU

Page 78

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

SBC = 350KN/m
Ka = (1-sin)/(1+sin)=0.33
Kp = (1+sin)/(1-sin)=3
Design constant
fck = 30 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
cbc =7.5(IRC 21-2000 Tab-9)
st = 200(IRC 21-2000Tab-10)
modular ratio m = 280/3cbc = 12.44
Co-efficient of N.A K= (mcbc)/(mcbc+st) =
co-efficient of Leq Arm j =1-

=1-

=0.893

co-efficient of moment of resistance R= cbc Kj


SET -JU

Page 79

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

=0.5*7.5*0.318*0.893
=1.06
Stability Analysis
To calculate BM
Earth pressure
Ph= KaH
=0.5*0.33*20*(5.1)
=85.83KN
M=Ph*
=85.83*( 5.1 3 )
=145.91KN-m
Surcharge pressure
Ph = KaqH
q=1.2*20[IRC-6-2000 Cl 217.1]
= 24 KN/m
Ph= 0.33*24*5.1
= 40.39 KN
M = Ph*
= 40.39*(5.12)
102.99 KN-m

Total over turning movement


M = 102.99+145.91
= 248.9 KN-m
SET -JU

Page 80

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Total pressure Ph = 85.83+40.39


= 126.22 KN
Item

Load in
(KN)
1*0.2*4.6*25=
23
(1/2)*0.3*4.6*25=
17.25 KN
3.8*0.5*1*25=
29.5 KN
1*2.3*4.6*20 =
211.6 KN
1*2.3*24=
55.2 KN
W=354.55

Stem
Rectangle
Triangular
Base slab
Earth filling
Above heel
Super imposed
Load

Distance from
Toe
(m)
1+(0.5/2)=1.25

BM
(KN-m)

1+0.2+(0.3/2)=
1.35
(3.8/2)=1.9

23.28

1+0.5+(2.3/2) =
2.65
1+0.5+(2.3/2)=
2.65

560.74

28.75

90.25

146.28
M=849.3

Check Against overturning :FOS = (MR/M)=

849.3
= 3.14 > 1.44(safe)
248.9

Check against sliding


FOS = (/Ph) =

0.5 * 354.55
= 1.40 1.44(safe)
126.22

Let ((MR-M)/ =

849.3 248.9
= 1.69
354.55

Eccentricity e = (b/2)-
=

3 .8
-1.69
2

= 0.21 <

b
=0.63 (ok)
2

max,min = (/b)[1(6e/b)]
=(
SET -JU

354.55
) [1
3.8

6 * 0...21
]
3.8

Page 81

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

max = 124.2 KN/m < SBC (350 KN/m) (ok)


min = 62.14KN/m > 0 (ok)

Design of Stem
Earth pressure Ph =

*Kah2 = 0.5*0.33*20*4.62 = 38.14 KN

MEp =69.82 *

4 .6
= 107.05KN-m
3

Surcharge pressure Ph = Kaqh = 0.33*24*4.6 = 36.43 KN


Msp = 36.43*

4 .6
= 83.78 KN-m
2

Total moment = MEP+Msp


M = 107.05+83.78
= 190.83 KN-m
Mn = 190.83*1.5
= 286.24 KN-m
Check for depth
Mn = 0.138 fCK bd2
286.24*106 = 0.138*30*1000*d2
d = 180mm < 400mm (safe)
SET -JU

Page 82

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

(Mn/bd2) =

286.24
*106
1000 * 350 * 350

=2.33

Assume clear cover 50mm


D = 400mm
d= 400-50 = 350mm

From Sp-16,Table-4
Pt = 0.595
Ast =

0.595
*1000*350
100

=2082.5
for #12mm
Spacing =

12 *12 * 0.7854
*1000
2082.5

= 54.28 mm
Provide #12mm Spacing @ 100mm c/c

Curtailment of Bars
Curtail by 50%
(

h 2
) = 0.5
5.1

h = 3.60 m
actual cut off = h-Ld
Ld = 50 = 50*
= 600 mm
Cutoff = 3.6-0.6
= 3 m From Top
Provide Spacing #12 mm @ 300 mm c/c
Distribution Steel

SET -JU

Page 83

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Ast =
=

*b*D
*1000*400

= 480mm2
for # 8mm2 Spacing = (((8)2/4)/480) *100 = 104.66mm
Provide Spacing 8mm @100mmc/c
check for Shear
v = (Vn/bd) =

(69 .82 36 .43) * 1.5


(1000 * 350 )

= 0.455 N/mm2
100 Ast 100 *1538.6

0.439
bd
1000 * 350

tab 19,PP73 IS456-2000


c = 0.463N/mm2
Hence v < c (safe)

Design of Toe Slab


1
2

M1 = [0.5*1*1*25] [ ] 6.25

SET -JU

(self Wt)

Page 84

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


1
2

M2 = [1*107.96*1] [ ] 53.18
2
3

M3 = [ *1*16.27*1] [ *1] 5.423

(moment clue to upward pressure)

(moment clue to upward pressure)

[M]=65.65 KN-m

Mn = 65.65*1.5 = 98.47 KN-m

Mn
98.47
*106 = 0.615

bd * d 100 * 400 * 400

from Sp-16
Pt = 0.1446
Ast =

0.1446
*1000 * 400
100

= 578.4 mm2
for # 10mm spacing =

0.78
*102*1000
578.4

Hence provide spacing # 10@ 120 mmc/c


Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*500 = 600 mm2

Spacing for #10mm =

0.75 *1000
*102 = 130.83 mm
600

Provide spacing # 10 @ 130mm c/c


Check for shear :
v = (Vn/bd)
Vu = [(1*0.5*1*25)-(1*107.96*0.5)+(0.5*1*16.27)]
= 79.73 KN

SET -JU

Page 85

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


79.73
*103 = 0.199 N/mm2
1000 * 400

v =

100 *1614.8
0.358
1000 * 450

c = 0.26 (IS456-2000,PP73)
Hence u < c (safe)

Design of Heel slab


M1= 2.3*62.41 [

M2=

2.3
] 165.07
2

*2.3*37.14 [

2.3
] 49.47
3

M3= 2.3*0.5*20 [

2.3
] 33.06
2

M4= 2.3*4.6*20 [

2.3
] 243.24
2

M5=2.3*24* [

Upward pressure

Upward pressure

2.3
] 63.48
2

Soil over Burden pressure


Self wt
Surcharge load

554.42 KN-m
M = 554.42*1.5=831.63. KN-m
(M2/bd2)=

831.63
*106 = 4.106
1000 * 450 * 450

from Sp-16 Pt = 1.13


Ast =

1.13
*1000*450
100

= 5085 mm2
Spacing for #10mm =

SET -JU

78.5
*1000
5085

Page 86

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

= 15.43 mm
provide spacing #10 @ 16 mm c/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*500

Ast = 600 mm2


Check for Shear :
v = (vn/bd)=

396.13
*103=0.88 N/mm2
1000 * 450

100 * 4906.25
1.090
1000 * 450

as per PP- 73, IS456-2000


c = 0.588
v < c (safe)

Designing of retaining wall R5


Density of soil =20KN/m
= 30
= 0
= 20
= 90

SET -JU

Page 87

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

SBC = 350KN/m
Ka = (1-sin)/(1+sin)=0.33
Kp = (1+sin)/(1-sin)=3
Design constant
fck = 30 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
cbc =7.5(IRC 21-2000 Tab-9)
st = 200(IRC 21-2000Tab-10)
modular ratio m = 280/3cbc = 12.44
Co-efficient of N.A K= (mcbc)/(mcbc+st) =
co-efficient of Leq Arm j =1-

=1-

=0.893

co-efficient of moment of resistance R= cbc Kj


=0.5*7.5*0.318*0.893
SET -JU

Page 88

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

=1.06
Stability Analysis
To calculate BM
Earth pressure
Ph= KaH
=0.5*0.33*20*(5.7)
=107.21KN
M=Ph*
=25*

5 .7
3

=203.71KN-m
Surcharge pressure
Ph = KaqH
q=1.2*20[IRC-6-2000 Cl 217.1]
= 24 KN/m
Ph= 0.33*24*5.7
= 45.144 KN
M = Ph*
= 128.66 KN-m
Total over turning movement
M = 128.66+203.71
= 332.37 KN-m
Total pressure Ph = 45.144+107.21
= 152.354 KN
SET -JU

Page 89

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Item

Load in
(KN)
1*0.2*5.2*25=
12.25
1*0.35*5.2*25=
45.5 KN
3.95*0.6*1*25=
59.25 KN
1*2.4*5.2*20 =
249.6 KN
1*2.4*24=
57.6 KN
W=437.95

Stem
Rectangle
Triangular
Base slab
Earth filling
Above heel
Super imposed
Load

Distance from
Toe
(m)
1+(0.2/2)=0.90

BM
(KN-m)

1+0.2+(0.35/2)=
1.37
(3.95/2)=1.975

62.52

1+0.55+(2.4/2) =
2.75
1+0.35+(2.4/2)=
2.55

28.6

117.01
686.4
146.88
M=1041.45

Check Against overturning :FOS = (MR/M)=

1041.45
= 3.133 > 1.44(safe)
332.37

Check against sliding


FOS = (/Ph) =

0.5 * 437.95
= 1.44 1.44(safe)
152.35

Let ((MR-M)/ =

1041.55 332.37
= 1.619
437.95

Eccentricity e = (b/2)-
=

3.95
-1.619
2

= 0.35 <

=0.658 (ok)

max,min = (/b)[1(6c/b)]
=(
SET -JU

437.95
) [1
3.95

6 * 0.35
]
3.95

Page 90

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

max = 169.81 KN/m < SBC (350 KN/m) (ok)


min = 51.92 KN/m > 0 (ok)

Design of Stem
Earth pressure Ph =

*Kah2 = 0.5*0.33*20*5.22 = 89.23 KN

MEp =89.23 *

5 .2
= 154.66KN-m
3

Surcharge pressure Ph = Kaqh = 0.33*24*5.2 = 41.18 KN


Msp = 41.18*

5 .2
= 107.08 KN-m
2

Total moment = MEP+Msp


M = 154.66+107.08
= 261.72 KN-m
Mn = 261.72*1.5
= 392.58 KN-m
Check for depth
Mn = 0.138 fCK bd2
392.5*106 = 0.138*30*1000*d2
d = 307.93 < 200mm (unsafe)
SET -JU

Page 91

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

assume D=450mm
d=450-50=400mm

(Mn/bd2) =

392.58
*106
1000 * 400 * 400

=2.4536

Assume clear cover 50mm


D = 200mm
d= 200-50 = 150mm

From Sp-16,Table-4
Pt = 0.631
Ast =

0.631
*1000*150
100

= 2524
for #12mm
Spacing =

12 * 12 * 0.7854
*1000
2524

= 44.78 mm
Provide #12mm Spacing @ 50mm c/c
Curtailment of Bars
Curtail by 50%
(

h 2
) = 0.5
5 .7

h = 4.03 m
actual cut off = h-Ld
Ld = 50 = 50*
= 1500 mm
Cutoff = 4.03-1.5
= 2.5 m From Top
SET -JU

Page 92

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Provide Spacing #12 mm @ 100 mm c/c


Distribution of Steel
Ast =
=

*b*D
*1000*450

= 540mm2
for # 8mm2 Spacing = (((8)2/4)/250) *100 = 200.56mm
Provide Spacing @8mm @200mmc/c
check for Shear
v = (Vn/bd) =

(89 .23 41 .18 ) *1.5


(1000 * 400 )

= 0.4890 N/mm2
100 Ast 100 * 2261.95

0.565
bd
1000 * 400

tab 19,PP73 IS456-2000


c = 0.5234 N/mm2
Hence v < c (safe)

Design of Toe Slab


SET -JU

Page 93

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


1
2

M1 = [1*0.6*1*25] [ ] 7.5
1
2

M2 = [1*139.96*1] [ ] 69.98
2
2

M3 = [ *1*29.85*1] [ * 1] 9.95

(self Wt)
(moment clue to upward pressure)

(moment clue to upward pressure)

[M]=72.43 KN-m
Mn = 72.43*1.5 = 108.64 KN-m
Mn
108.64
*106 = 0.359

bd * d 100 * 550 * 550

from Sp-16
Pt = 0.0825
Ast =

0.0825
* 1000 * 550
100

= 453.75 mm2
for # 10mm spacing =

0.78
*102*1000
453.75

Hence provide spacing # 10@ 190 mmc/c


Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*600 = 720 mm2

Spacing for #10mm =

0.75 * 1000
*102 = 109.627 mm
720

Provide spacing # 10 @ 100mm c/c


Check for shear
v = (Vn/bd)
Vu = [(1*0.6*1*25)-(1*139.96*1)+(0.5*1*29.85)]
= 209.82 KN

SET -JU

Page 94

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


209.82
*103 = 0.3814 N/mm2
1000 * 550

v =

100 * 436.11
0.29
1000 * 550

c = 0.29 (IS456-2000,PP73)
Hence u < c (safe)
Design of Heel slab
M1= 2.4*51.92 [

M2=

2.4
] 149.52
2

*2.4*71.62 [

2.4
] 68.75
3

Upward pressure

Upward pressure

M3= 2.4*5.6*25 [

2.4
] 43.2
2

Soil over Burden pressure

M4= 2.4*5.7*20 [

2.4
] 328.32
2

Self wt

M5=2.4*24* [

2.4
] 69.12
2

Surcharge load

222.37 KN-m
Mu = 333.55 KN-m
(M2/bd2)=

333.55
*106 = 1.1026
1000 * 550 * 550

from Sp-16 Pt = 0.2629


Ast =

0.2629
*1000*550
100

= 1445059 mm2
Spacing for #10mm =

78.5
*1000
1445.59

= 54.30 mm
provide spacing #10 @ 50 mm c/c
SET -JU

Page 95

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*600

Ast = 720 mm2


spacing for #10mm= 78.5 * 1000 109.02
720

provide spacing @10@ 100mmc/c

check for Shear :


v = (vn/bd)=

156.64
*103=0.284 N/mm2
1000 * 550

100 * 1570
0.285
1000 * 550

as per PP- 73, IS456-2000


c = 0.3882
v < c (safe)

Designing of retaining wall R6


Density of soil =20KN/m
= 30
= 0
= 20
= 90

SET -JU

Page 96

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

SBC = 350KN/m
Ka = (1-sin)/(1+sin)=0.33
Kp = (1+sin)/(1-sin)=3
Design constant
fck = 30 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
cbc =7.5(IRC 21-2000 Tab-9)
st = 200(IRC 21-2000Tab-10)
modular ratio m = 280/3cbc = 12.44
Co-efficient of N.A K= (mcbc)/(mcbc+st) =
co-efficient of Leq Arm j =1-

12 .44 * 7.5
0.318
(12 .44 * 7.5) 200

K
0.318
=1=0.893
3
3

1
2

co-efficient of moment of resistance R= cbc Kj


=0.5*7.5*0.318*0.893
=1.06
SET -JU

Page 97

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Stability Analysis
To calculate BM
Earth pressure
1
2

Ph= KaH
=0.5*0.33*20*(6.3)
=130.977KN
M=Ph*

H
3

=85.83*(6.3/3)
=275.05KN-m
Surcharge pressure
Ph = KaqH
q=1.2*20[IRC-6-2000 Cl 217.1]
= 24 KN/m
Ph= 0.33*24*6.3
= 49.89 KN
M = Ph*

H
2

= 49.89*(6.32)
157.15 KN-m
Total over turning movement
M = 157.15+275.05
= 432.20 KN-m
Total pressure Ph = 49.89+130.977
= 180.86 KN
Item

SET -JU

Load in
(KN)

Distance from Toe


(m)

BM
(KN-m)
Page 98

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

1*0.2*5.7*25=
1+(0.2/2)=1.1
28.5
(1/2)*0.4*5.7*25=
1+0.2+(0.4/2)=
28.5 KN
1.4
4.2*0.6*1*25=
(4.2/2)=1.9
63 KN
1*2.6*5.7*20 =
296.4 KN
1+0.2+0.4+(2.6/2) =
2.9
1*2.6*24=
0.8+0.2+0.4+(2.6/2)=
62.4 KN
2.9
W=478.8

Stem
Rectangle
Triangular
Base slab
Earth filling
Above heel
Super imposed
Load

31.35
39.9
132.3
859.56

168.48
M=1231.59

Check Against overturning :FOS = (MR/M)=

1231.59
= 2.84 > 1.44(safe)
432.2

Check against sliding


FOS = (/Ph) =

0.5 * 478.8
= 1.323 1.44(unsafe)
180.86

It is unsafe against sliding shear key is to be provided


Let ((MR-M)/ =

1231.59 432.2
= 1.66
478.8

Eccentricity e = (b/2)-
=

4 .2
-1.66
2

= 0.44 <

b
=0.7 (ok)
2

max,min = (/b)[1(6e/b)]
=(

478.8
6 * 0.44
) [1
]
4.2
4.2

max = 185.65 KN/m < SBC (350 KN/m) (ok)


min = 42.40KN/m > 0 (ok)

SET -JU

Page 99

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Design of Stem
Earth pressure Ph =

1
*Kah2 = 0.5*0.33*20*5.72 = 107.21 KN
2

MEp =107.21 *

5 .7
= 203.69KN-m
3

Surcharge pressure Ph = Kaqh = 0.33*24*5.7 = 45.14 KN


Msp = 45.14*

5 .7
= 128.64 KN-m
2

Total moment = MEP+Msp


M = 203.69+128.64
= 332.33 KN-m
Mn = 332.23*1.5
= 498.49 KN-m
Check for depth
Mn = 0.138 fCK bd2
498.49*106 = 0.138*30*1000*d2
d = 346.99 200mm (unsafe)
Thickness is more than the limiting value hence the section is under reinforced

SET -JU

Page 100

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

(Mn/bd2) =

498.49
*106
1000 * 400 * 400

=3.115

Assume clear cover 50mm


D = 400mm
d= 400-50 = 350mm

From Sp-16,Table-4
Pt = 0.8328
Ast =

0.8328
*1000*400
100

=3331.2
for #16mm
Spacing =

16 *16 * 0.785
*1000
3331.2

= 60.32 mm
Provide #16mm Spacing @ 60mm c/c
Curtailment of Bars
Curtail by 50%
(

h 2
) = 0.5
6 .3

h = 4.45 m
actual cut off = h-Ld
Ld = 50 = 50*
= 1500 mm
Cutoff = 4.45-1.5
= 2.95 m From Top
Provide Spacing #16 mm @ 122 mm c/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =

0.12
*b*D
100

SET -JU

Page 101

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

0.12
*1000*450
100

= 540mm2
for # 10mm2 Spacing = (((10)2/4)/540) *100 = 145.37mm
Provide Spacing 10mm @150mmc/c
check for Shear
v = (Vn/bd) =

(107 .21 45 .14 ) * 1.5


(1000 * 400 )

= 0.57 N/mm2
100 Ast 100 * 3349.33

0.837
bd
1000 * 400

tab 19,PP73 IS456-2000


c = 0.6143 N/mm2
Hence v < c (safe)

Design of Toe Slab


1
2

M1 = [0.6*1*1*25] [ ] 7.5
1
2

M2 = [1*151.54*1] [ ] 75.77

SET -JU

(self Wt)
(moment clue to upward pressure)

Page 102

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


2
3

1
2

M3 = [ *1*34.11*1] [ *1] 11.37

(moment clue to upward pressure)

[M]=79.64 KN-m
Mu = 79.64*1.5 = 119.46 KN-m
Mn
119.46
*106 = 0.394

bd * d 100 * 550 * 550

from Sp-16
Pt = 0.0916
Ast =

0.0916
*1000 * 550
100

= 503.8 mm2
for # 16mm spacing =

0.78
*162*1000
503.8

S = 398.88
Hence provide spacing # 16@ 200 mmc/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =

0.12
*1000*600 = 720 mm2
100

Spacing for #16mm =

0.75 *1000
*162 = 279.11 mm
720

Provide spacing # 16 @ 280mm c/c


Check for shear :
v = (Vn/bd)
Vu = [(1*0.6*1*25)-(1*151.54*0.5)+(0.5*1*34.11)]
= 230.39 KN
v =

239.39
*103 = 0.418 N/mm2
1000 * 550

100( Ast) provided 100 * 502.2


=
0.476
bd
1000 * 550

c = 0.44 (IS456-2000,PP73)
SET -JU

Page 103

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Hence u < c (safe)


M1= 2.6*42.4 [
M2=

2.6
] 143.312
2

2.6
1
*2.6*88.67 [ ] 99.90
2
3

M3= 2.6*0.6*25 [

2.6
] 50.70
2

M4= 2.6*5.7*20 [

2.6
] 385.32
2

M5=2.6*24* [

Upward pressure

Upward pressure

2.6
] 81.12
2

Soil over Burden pressure


Self wt
Surcharge load

473.72 KN-m
M = 473.72*1.5=710.59. KN-m
(M2/bd2)=

710.59
*106 = 2.34
1000 * 550 * 550

from Sp-16 Pt = 0.5982


Ast =

0.5982
*1000*550
100

= 3290.1 mm2
Spacing for #10mm =

78.5
*1000
3290.1

= 23.85 mm
provide spacing #10 @ 25 mm c/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =

0.12
*1000*600
100

Ast = 720 mm2


Spacing for #10mm =

78.5
* 100 =109.027
720

Provide 10mm diameter bar @100mm c/c


SET -JU

Page 104

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Check for Shear :


v = (vu/bd)
vu=[(2.6*42.40)+(0.5*2.6*88.67)-(2.6*5.7*20)+(2.6*0.6*25)+(2.6*24)]*1.5
vu=258.43
=

258.43
*103=0.469 N/mm2
1000 * 550

100( Ast) provided 100 * 3140


=
0.57
bd
1000 * 550

as per PP- 73, IS456-2000


c = 0.5252
v < c (safe)

Designing of retaining wall R7


Density of soil =20KN/m
= 30
= 0
= 20
= 90

SET -JU

Page 105

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

SBC = 350KN/m
Ka = (1-sin)/(1+sin)=0.33
Kp = (1+sin)/(1-sin)=3
Design constant
fck = 30 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
cbc =7.5(IRC 21-2000 Tab-9)
st = 200(IRC 21-2000Tab-10)
modular ratio m = 280/3cbc = 12.44
Co-efficient of N.A K= (mcbc)/(mcbc+st) =
co-efficient of Leq Arm j =1-

=1-

=0.893

co-efficient of moment of resistance R= cbc Kj


=0.5*7.5*0.318*0.893
=1.06
SET -JU

Page 106

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Stability Analysis
To calculate BM
Earth pressure
Ph= KaH
=0.5*0.33*20*(7.1)
=166.3KN
M=Ph*
=25*

7 .1
3

=394KN-m
Surcharge pressure
Ph = KaqH
q=1.2*20[IRC-6-2000 Cl 217.1]
= 24 KN/m
Ph= 0.33*24*7.1
= 56.23 KN
M = Ph*
= 200KN-m
Total over turning movement
M = 394+200
= 594 KN-m
Total pressure Ph = 166.3+56.23
= 222.53KN
Item
SET -JU

Load in
(KN)

Distance from
Toe

BM
(KN-m)
Page 107

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

(m)
1.2+(0.2/2)=1.3

Stem
Rectangle
Triangular
Base slab
Earth filling
Above heel
Super imposed
Load

1*0.2*6.5*25=
32.5
(1/2)*0.45*6.5*25= 1.2+0.2+(0.45/2)=
36.56 KN
1.625
4.65*0.7*1*25=
(4.65/2)=2.325
81.37 KN
1*2.8*6.5*20 =
1.2+0.65+(2.8/2)
36.4 KN
=
3.25
1*2.8*24=
1.2+0.65+(2.8/2)=
67.2 KN
3.25
W=581.63

42.25
59.41
189.18
1183

218.4
M=1692.24

Check Against overturning :FOS = (MR/M)=

1692.24
= 2.84 > 1.44(safe)
594

Check against sliding


FOS = (/Ph) =

0.5 * 581.63
= 1.30 1.44(unsafe)
222.53

Therefore provide shear key


Let ((MR-M)/w =

1692.24 594
= 1.88
581.63

Eccentricity e = (b/2)-
=

4.65
-1.88
2

= 0.445 <

b
(0.77) (ok)
6

max,min = (/b)[1(6e/b)]
=(

58163
6 * 0.445
) [1
]
4.65
4.65

= 125.08(10.574)
max = 196 KN/m < SBC (350 KN/m) (ok)
SET -JU

Page 108

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

min = 53.2 KN/m > 0 (ok)

Design of Stem
Earth pressure Ph =

1
*Kah2 = 0.5*0.33*20*6.52 = 139.42 KN
2

MEp =139.42 *

6 .5
= 302 KN-m
3

Surcharge pressure
Ph = Kaqh = 0.33*24*6.5 = 51.48 KN
Msp = 51.48*

6 .5
= 54.73 KN-m
2

Total moment = MEP+Msp


M = 302+54.73
= 356.73 KN-m
Mn = 350.73*1.5
= 535 KN-m
Check for depth
Mn = 0.138 fCK bd2
59.79*106 = 0.138*30*1000*d2
d = 360 < 400mm (safe)

SET -JU

Page 109

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

(Mn/bd2) =

535
*106
1000 *150 *150

=23.77

Assume clear cover 50mm


D = 200mm
d= 200-50 = 150mm

From Sp-16,Table-E
Pt = 1.13
Ast =

1.13
*1000*150
100

= 1695
for #12mm Spacing =

12 *12 * 0.7854
*1000
1695

= 66.72 mm
Provide #12mm Spacing @ 100mm c/c
Curtailment of Bars
Curtail by 50%
(

h 2
) = 0.5
7 .1

h = 5.02 m
actual cut off = h-Ld
Ld = 50 = 50*30
= 1500 mm
Destination Steel
Ast =

0.12
*b*D
100

0.12
*1000*200
100

= 300mm2
check for Shear

SET -JU

Page 110

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

v = (Vn/bd) =

(139 .42 51 .48 ) *1.5


(1000 *150 )

= 0.0019 N/mm2
100 Ast 100 *1615.6

1.07
bd
1000 *150

tab 19,PP73 IS 456-2000


c = 0.685 N/mm2
Hence v < c (safe)

Design of Toe Slab


1.2
] 12.6
2

M1 = [1.2*0.7*1*25] [

(self Wt)

1.2
] 114.55
2

M2 = [1.2*159.1*1] [

(moment clue to upward

pressure)
1
2

2
2

M3 = [ *1.2*36.9*1] [ *1.2] 17.71

(moment clue to upward pressure)

[M]=119.66 KN-m
Mn = 119.66*1.5 = 179.49 KN-m
Mn
217.29
*106 = 0.424

bd * d 1000 * 650 * 650

from Sp-16
SET -JU

Page 111

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Pt = 0.0987
Ast =

0.0987
*1000 * 650
100

= 641.55 mm2
for # 10mm spacing =

0.7854
*102*1000
641.55

= 122.24
Hence provide spacing # 10@ 100 mmc/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =

0.12
*1000*700 = 840 mm2
100

Spacing for #10mm =

0.7854 *1000
*102 = 93.5 mm
840

Provide spacing # 10mm @ 100mm c/c


Check for shear :
v = (Vn/bd)
Vu = [(1.2*0.7*1*25)-(1.2*159.1*1)+(0.5*1.2*36.9)]1.5
= 221.67 KN
v =

221.67
*103 = 0.34 N/mm2
1000 * 650

100( Ast) provided 100 * 785.4


=
0.48
bd
1000 * 650

c = 0.485 (IS456-2000,PP73)
Hence u < c (safe)
Design of Heel slab
M1=2.8*53.2 [
M2=

2.8
] 208.54
2

2.8
1
*2.8*85.9 [ ] 168.36
2
3

SET -JU

Upward pressure
Upward pressure

Page 112

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

M3= 2.8*0.7*25 [

2.8
] 68.6
2

Soil over Burden pressure

M4= 2.8*4.6*20 [

2.8
] 360.64
2

Self wt

M5=2.8*24* [

2.8
] 94.08
2

Surcharge load

M= 146.42 KN-m
Mu=146.42*1.5
Mu = 219.63 KN-m
(M2/bd2)=

219.63
*106 = 0.57
1000 * 650 * 650

from Sp-16 Pt = 0.1194


Ast =

0.1194
*1000*650
100

= 776.5 mm2
Spacing for #10mm =

78.5
*1000
776.1

= 101.1 mm
provide spacing #10 @ 100 mm c/c
Distribution of Steel
Ast =

0.12
*1000*700
100

Ast = 840 mm2


Spacing for 10mm =

78.5
*100 93.45 mm
840

Provide spacing @10mm@100mm c/c


Check for Shear :
v = (vn/bd)=

138.6
*103=0.213 N/mm2
1000 * 650

100( Ast) provided 100 * 705.5


=
0.1
bd
1000 * 650

SET -JU

Page 113

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

as per PP- 73, IS456-2000


c = 0.29
v < c (safe)
Design of shear key
Pressure at phase of toe
=159.1
Co-eff of passive earth pressure=kp=3
If a is a projection of shear key resistance offered by passive
Earth pr= kp*verticle pr
=3*159.1
=477.3
w pp
Therefore FOS against F2= p

0.9 * 0.5 * 581.63 477.3a


166.3
1.4=

a=0.060

Designing of retaining wall 8


Density of soil =20KN/m
= 30
= 0
= 20
= 90

SET -JU

Page 114

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

SBC = 350KN/m
Ka = (1-sin)/(1+sin)=0.33
Kp = (1+sin)/(1-sin)=3
Design constant
fck = 30 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
cbc =7.5(IRC 21-2000 Tab-9)
st = 200(IRC 21-2000Tab-10)
modular ratio m = 280/3cbc = 12.44
Co-efficient of N.A K= (mcbc)/(mcbc+st) =
co-efficient of Leq Arm j =1-

=1-

=0.893

co-efficient of moment of resistance R= cbc Kj


SET -JU

Page 115

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

=0.5*7.5*0.318*0.893
=1.06
Stability Analysis
To calculate BM
Earth pressure
Ph= KaH
=0.5*0.33*20*(7.6)
=190.60KN
M=Ph*
=190.60*(7.6/3)
=482.87KN-m
Surcharge pressure
Ph = KaqH

q=1.2*20[IRC-6-2000 Cl 217.1]
= 24 KN/m
Ph= 0.33*24*7.6
= 60.192 KN
M = Ph*
= 60.192*(7.62)
228.72 KN-m
Total over turning movement
M = 228.72+482.87
= 711.59 KN-m
SET -JU

Page 116

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Total pressure Ph = 60.192+190.60


= 250.79 KN
Item

Load in
(KN)
1*0.2*6.9*25=
35.5
(1/2)*0.5*6.9*25=
43.125 KN
0.7*4.9*1*25=
85.75 KN
1*3*6.9*20 =
414 KN
1*3*24=
72 KN
W=649.37KN

Stem
Rectangle
Triangular
Base slab
Earth filling
Above heel
Super imposed
Load

Distance from
Toe
(m)
1.2+(0.2/2)=1.3

BM
(KN-m)

1.2+0.2+(0.5/2)=
1.65
(4.9/2)=2.45

71.156

1.2+0.7+(3/2) =
3.4
1.2+0.7+(3/2)=
3.4

1407.6

44.85

210.08

244.8
M=1978.48KNM

Check Against overturning :FOS = (MR/M)=

1978.48
= 3.02 > 1.44(safe)
711.59

Check against sliding


FOS = (/Ph) =

0.5 * 649.37
= 1.29 1.44(safe)
250.79

Let ((MR-M)/ =

1978.48 711.59
= 1.95
250.79

Eccentricity e = (b/2)-
=

4 .9
-1.95
2

= 0.5 <

b
=0.81 (ok)
6

max,min = (w/b)[1(6e/b)]
SET -JU

Page 117

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

=(

649.37
) [1
4.9

6 * 0.5
]
4.9

max = 213.62 KN/m < SBC (350 KN/m) (ok)


min = 51.38 KN/m > 0 (ok)

Design of Stem
Earth pressure Ph =

*Kah2 = 0.5*0.33*20*6.92 = 22.77 KN

MEp =22.77 *

6 .9
= 52.371KN-m
3

Surcharge pressure Ph = Kaqh = 0.33*24*6.9 = 54.64 KN


Msp = 54.64*

6 .9
= 188.50 KN-m
2

Total moment = MEP+Msp


M = 188.50+52.371
= 240.87 KN-m
Mn = 240.87*1.5
= 361.30 KN-m
Check for depth
Mn = 0.138 fCK bd2
361.30*106 = 0..138*30*1000*d2
SET -JU

Page 118

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

d = 295.41mm >200mm (unsafe)


Thickness is more than limiting value hence the section is under reinforced
assume depth 450mm

D=450mm

d=450-50=400mm where 50mm is cover

(Mn/bd2) =

361.30
*106
1000 * 400 * 400

=2.258
From Sp-16,Table-4
Pt = 0.574
Ast =

0.574
*1000*400
100

= 2296 mm2
for #16mm
Spacing =

16 *16 * 0.7854
*1000
2296

= 87.52 mm
Provide #16mm Spacing @ 90mm c/c
Curtailment of Bars
Curtail by 50%
(

h 2
) = 0.5
7 .6

h = 5.37 m
actual cut off = h-Ld
Ld = 50 = 50*
= 1500 mm
Cutoff = 5.37-1.5
= 3.87 m From Top
SET -JU

Page 119

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Provide Spacing #12 mm @ 100 mm c/c


Distribution of Steel
Ast =
=

*b*D
*1000*450

= 540mm2
for # 12mm2 Spacing = (((12)2/4)/4900) *1000 = 23.06mm
Provide Spacing 12mm @30mmc/c
Check for Shear
v = (Vn/bd) =

(22 .77 54 .64 ) *1.5


(1000 * 400 )

= 0.290 N/mm2
100 Ast 100 * 22.32.88

0.55
bd
1000 * 400

tab 19,PP73 IS456-2000


c = 0.518 N/mm2
Hence v < c (safe)

Design of Toe Slab


SET -JU

Page 120

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014


1.2
] 12.6
2

M1 = [1.2*0.7*1*25] [

(self Wt)

1.2
] 125.19
2

M2 = [1.2*173.38*1] [

(moment clue to upward

pressure)
2
3

M3 = [ *1.2 *39.74*1] [ *1.2] 19.075

(moment clue to upward

pressure)
[M]=131.66 KN-m
Mn = 131.66*1.5 = 197.49 KN-m
Mn
197.49
*106 = 0.467

bd * d 1000 * 650 * 650

from Sp-16
Pt = 0.109
Ast =

0.109
*1000 * 650
100

= 708.5 mm2
for # 12mm spacing =

0.785
*102*1000
708.5

Hence provide spacing # 10@ 100 mmc/c


Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*700 = 840 mm2

Spacing for #10mm =

0.75 *1000
*102 = 93.45 mm
840

Provide spacing # 10 @ 100mm c/c


Check for shear :
v = (Vn/bd)
Vu = [(1.2*0.7*1*25)-(1.2*173.58*1)+(0.5*1.2*39.74)]
SET -JU

Page 121

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

= 211.13*1.5 =316.69KN
316.69
*103 = 0.36 N/mm2
1000 * 250

v =

100 * 785
0.22
1000 * 650

c = 0.48 (IS456-2000,PP73)
Hence u < c (safe)
Design of Heel slab
3
2

M1= 3*51.38 [ ] 231.21


3
3

*3*99.33 [ ] 148.99

M2=

3
2

M3= 2.6*0.7*20 [ ] 68.5


3
2

M4= 2.6*6.9*20 [ ] 538.2


3
2

M5=2.6*24* [ ] 93.6

Upward pressure

Upward pressure
Soil over Burden pressure

Self wt

Surcharge load

617.83 KN-m
M = 617.83*1.5=926.74 KN-m
(M2/bd2)=

926.74
*106 = 2.193
1000 * 650 * 650

from Sp-16 Pt = 0.556


Ast =

1.0845
*1000*650
100

= 7049.25 mm2
Spacing for #10mm =

78.5
*1000
7049.25

= 11.1 mm
SET -JU

Page 122

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

provide spacing #10 @ 15 mm c/c


Distribution of Steel
Ast =

*1000*760

Ast = 840 mm2


spacing @10mm=

78.5 *100
93.45
840

provide at 10mm @ 100mm c/c


check for Shear :
v = (vn/bd)=

245.34
*103=0.377 N/mm2
1000 * 650

100 * 5233.34
0.805
1000 * 650

as per PP- 73, IS456-2000


c = 0.6054
v < c (safe)

SET -JU

Page 123

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 6
Geometrical Design

SET -JU

Page 124

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 6
Geometrical Design
6.1 General
The proposed grade separator at the junction of Magadi Road and
Basaveshwara nagar. The proposed Underpass is a 2x2-lane wide having a carriage
way of 7.50m
The proposed alignment is straight and underpass is intended to carry the
traffic from magadi road to Vijayanagar.
The horizontal alignment, vertical gradient, width of underpass, width of
service road, drain and foot path is proposed.
The vertical clearance of min 5.50m is proposed at box. This report presents
design of vertical alignment and salient features of the proposed grade separator in
the following pages

6.2 Design Standards


6.2.1 Design speeds
The design speeds given in Table 6.2.1 shall be adopted for various terrain
classification

Table 6.2.1
Nature of Terrain

Cross slope of the


ground

Plain and rolling


Mountainous and steep

Up to 25 per cent
More than 25 per cent

Design speed (km/hr)


Ruling Minimum
100
60

80
40

6.2.2 Lane width of Carriageway


The standard lane width of the Project Highway shall be 3.5 m.
SET -JU

Page 125

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

6.2.3 Median
The median shall be either raised or depressed. The width of median is the
distance between inside edges of carriageway. The type of median shall depend
upon the availability of Right of Way. The minimum width of median, subject to
availability of Right of Way, for various locations shall be as in Table 6.2.3.

Width of median
Table 6.2.3
Type of Section

Open country with isolated built up


area
Built up area
Approach to grade separated structure

Minimum Width of Median (m)


Plain and Rolling Mountainous and
terrain
Steep terrain
Raised Depressed
Raised
median
4.5
7.0
2.0
2.0

Not
Applicable
Not
Applicable

4.5

2.0
2.0

6.2.4 Shoulders
The shoulder width on the outer side (left side of carriageway) shall be as
given in Tables 6.2.4.1 and 6.2.4.2

Width of Shoulders in Plain and Rolling Terrain


Table 6.2.4.1
Type of Section
Width of Shoulder (m)
Paved
Earthen
Total
Open country with isolated built up area
Built up area
Approaches to grade separated
structures
Approaches to bridges
SET -JU

1.5
2.0
2.0

2.0
-

3.5
2.0
2.0

1.5

2.0

3.5
Page 126

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Width of Shoulders in Mountainous and Steep Terrain (Hilly Area)


Table 6.2.4.2
Type of Section

Width of Shoulder, including drain and


crash barrier as applicable (m)

Open country with isolated built up area


Built up area and approaches to grade
separated structures bridges

1.5 (on hill side)


2.0 (on valley side)
1.5 (on hill side)
2.0 (on valley side)

Earthen Shoulder
Raised Footpath
along with
provision of
adequate drainage
along and across
the footpath

6.2.5 Roadway Width


The width of roadway shall depend upon the width of carriageway, shoulders
and the median. On horizontal curves with radius up to 300 m, width of pavement
and roadway in each carriageway shall be increased as per Table 6.2.5.

Extra Width of Pavement and Roadway in each carriageway


Table 6.2.5
Radius of Curve
Extra Width
75-100 m
101-300 m

0.9 m
0.6 m

6.2.6 Sight Distance


The safe stopping sight distance and desirable minimum sight distance for
divided carriageway for various design speeds are given in Table 6.2.6. The
desirable values of sight distance shall be adopted unless there are site constraints.
A minimum of safe stopping sight distance shall be available throughout.

Safe Sight Distance


SET -JU

Page 127

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Table 6.2.6
Design Speed
(km/hr)
100
80
60
40

Safe Stopping sight


distance (m)
180
180
90
45

Desirable minimum
sight distance (m)
360
260
180
90

6.2.7 Vertical Alignment


The vertical alignment should provide for a smooth longitudinal profile.
Grade changes shall not be too frequent as to cause kinks and visual discontinuities
in the profile. In this regard, directions given in IRC: 73 should be kept in view.

6.2.8 Gradients
The ruling and limiting gradients are given in Table 6.2.8.

Nature of terrain
Plain and rolling
Mountainous
Steep

Gradients
Table 6.2.8
Nature of terrain
3.3%
5.0%
6.0%

Limiting gradient
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%

6.3 Lateral and Vertical Clearance at Underpasses


Wherever a cross road is proposed to be taken below the Project Highway,
minimum clearances at underpasses shall be as follows:

Lateral Clearance

SET -JU

Page 128

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Full roadway width at the approaches shall be carried through the underpass.
This width shall not be less than 12 m (7 m carriageway + 2 2.5 m
shoulder width on either side) or as indicated in Schedule-B.
Guardrails/crash barriers shall be provided for protection of vehicles from
colliding with the abutments and piers and the deck of the structures.
The width of cattle and/or pedestrian underpass shall not be less than 5 m.

Vertical Clearance
Vertical clearance at underpasses shall not be less than the values given
below:

Vehicular underpass
Pedestrian and Cattle underpass

5.5 m
3.0 m (to be increased to 4.5m, in
case certain
categories of animals such as
elephant/camel
are expected to cross the Project
Highway frequently)

6.4 GEOMETRIC DESIGN


Design of Horizontal and Vertical Alignment is presented below:
Design of Horizontal Alignment: HIP-01
Horizontal Alignment
Speed

HIP-01
50 Kmph

No of Lanes

Width of Carriage way

7.5 m

Width of Crash barriers

0.5 m

SET -JU

Page 129

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Total Width of Deck

8.5 m

Cross Camber in Carriage Way

2.50 %

Details of Curve
Radius of Curve

429.55 m

Deviation Angle

3.94

Tangent Length

14.775

Beginning of Curve

82.323

Length of Curve
End of Curve

29.54 m
111.86

As per IRC-86-1983, Extra Widening and Super Elevation is not required for Design
Speed 50 KM/hr

Horizontal Alignment

HIP-02

Speed

50 kmph

No of Lanes

Width of Carriage way

7.5 m

Width of Crash barriers

0.5 m

Total Width of Deck

8.5 m

Cross Camber in Carriage Way

2.50 %

Details of Curve
Radius of Curve

458 m

Deviation Angle

5.42

SET -JU

Page 130

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Tangent Length

21.679

Beginning of Curve

627.89

Length of Curve
End of Curve

43.33 m
671.22

As per IRC-86-1983, Extra Widening and Super Elevation is not required for Design
Speed 50 KM/hr

Vertical Alignment
The vertical The vertical alignment consists of 2 summit curves at the beginning of
approach ramps on Magadi Road side, and Vijayanagar side, 1 valley curves are
proposed near box. The vertical gradient provided is 1 in 10 towards Magadi, 1 in
25 towards Vijayanagar. The speed considered in the vertical alignment is 40Kmph
as per NIT.

Summit curve(VIP -01) at Ch


Speed
Stopping site distance
G1
G2

106.629
40.000 Kmph
45.000 from table 8 IRC:86-1993
0.012
-0.0500

Length of Valley curve(L)


Case 1- when L>S

N= G1-G2=0.062
= 41.060 m
Case 2- when L<S

SET -JU

Page 131

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

N= G1-G2=0.062
= 40.68164 m
Hence length of the curve = 41.05976 m
However provide L = 45 m

Beginning of Curve
VIP Chainage
End of Curve

CH = 84.124
CH = 106.629
CH = 129.129

Ordinates of vertical curve

C = G1 -G2/200L
C = 0.00069278
h = Tangent Correction
X = Distance from the point of curve
Beginning of Curve
CH = 84.124
VIP Chainage
CH = 106.629
End of Curve
CH = 129.129
RL on tangent at the beginning of
102.412
Curve
Vertical Gradient (from BC to VIP) 1 in 80.97

Vertical Gradient (from VIP to EOC) 1 in 20

Chainage

Distance

h(m)

84.129

0.00

0.000

RL
on Proposed
Tangent
Road
level
102.412
102.412

86.379

2.25

0.004

102.440

SET -JU

Remarks

Beginning
of curve

102.436
Page 132

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

valley curve(VIP -02) at Ch

353.129

88.629
90.879
93.129
95.379
97.629
99.879
102.129
104.379
106.629
108.879
111.129
113.379
115.629
117.879
120.129
122.379
124.629
126.879
129.129

102.468
102.495
102.523
102.551
102.579
102.607
102.634
102.662
102.690
102.577
102.465
102.352
102.240
102.127
102.015
101.902
101.790
101.677
101.565

SET -JU

4.50
6.75
9.00
11.25
13.50
15.75
18.00
20.25
22.50
20.25
18.00
15.75
13.50
11.25
9.00
6.75
4.50
2.25
0.00

0.014
0.032
0.056
0.088
0.126
0.172
0.224
0.284
0.351
0.284
0.224
0.172
0.126
0.088
0.056
0.032
0.014
0.004
0.000

102.454
102.464
102.467
102.463
102.452
102.435
102.410
102.378
102.339
102.293
102.240
102.181
102.114
102.040
102.959
101.871
101.776
101.674
101.565

VIP 1

End
curve

of

Page 133

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Speed
Stopping site distance
G1
G2

40.000 Kmph
45.000 from table 8 IRC:86-1993
-0.050
0.0400

Length of Valley curve(L)


Case 1- when L>S

N= G1-G2=0.090
= 59.268 m
Case 2- when L<S

N= G1-G2=0.090
= 55.83333 m
Hence length of the curve = 59.26829 m
However provide L = 60 m

Beginning of Curve
VIP Chainage
End of Curve

CH = 323.129
CH = 353.129
CH = 383.129

Ordinates of vertical curve

C = G1 -G2/200L
SET -JU

Page 134

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

C = 0.00075
h = Tangent Correction
X = Distance from the point of curve
Beginning of Curve
CH = 323.129
VIP Chainage
CH = 353.129
End of Curve
CH = 383.129
RL on tangent at the beginning of
91.865
Curve
Vertical Gradient (from BC to VIP) 1 in 20.00
Vertical Gradient (from VIP to EOC) 1 in 25.00

Chainage

Distance

h(m)

323.129

0.00

0.000

RL
on Proposed
Tangent
Road
level
91.865
91.865

326.129
329.129
332.129
335.129
338.129
341.129
344.129
347.129
350.129
353.129
356.129
359.129
362.129
365.129

3.00
6.00
9.00
12.00
15.00
18.00
21.00
24.00
27.00
30.00
27.00
24.00
21.00
18.00

0.007
0.027
0.061
0.108
0.169
0.243
0.331
0.432
0.547
0.675
0.547
0.432
0.331
0.243

91.715
91.565
91.415
91.265
91.115
90.965
90.815
90.665
90.515
90.365
90.485
90.605
90.725
90.845

SET -JU

91.722
91.592
91.476
91.373
91.284
91.208
91.146
91.097
91.062
91.040
91.032
91.037
91.056
91.088

Remarks

Beginning
of curve

VIP 1

Page 135

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

368.129
371.129
374.129
377.129
380.129
383.129

15.00
12.00
9.00
6.00
3.00
0.00

0.169
0.108
0.061
0.027
0.007
0.000

90.965
91.085
91.205
91.325
91.445
91.565

91.134
91.193
91.266
91.352
91.452
91.565

End
curve

of

Length of Valley curve(L)


Case 1- when L>S

summit curve(VIP -03) at Ch


Speed
Stopping site distance
G1
G2

402.081
30.000 Kmph
30.000 from table 8 IRC:86-1993
0.040
-0.0400

N= G1-G2=0.080
= 28.235 m
Case 2- when L<S

N= G1-G2=0.080
= 28.325 m
Hence length of the curve = 28.23529 m
SET -JU

Page 136

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

However provide L = 30 m

Beginning of Curve
VIP Chainage
End of Curve

CH = 387.081
CH = 402.081
CH = 417.081

Ordinates of vertical curve

C = G1 -G2/200L
C = 0.00133333
h = Tangent Correction
X = Distance from the point of curve
Beginning of Curve
CH = 387.081
VIP Chainage
CH = 402.081
End of Curve
CH = 417.081
RL on tangent at the beginning of
91.723
Curve
Vertical Gradient (from BC to VIP) 1 in 25.00
Vertical Gradient (from VIP to EOC) 1 in 25.00

Chainage

Distance

h(m)

387.081

0.00

0.000

RL
on Proposed
Tangent
Road
level
91.723
91.723

388.581
390.081
391.581
393.081
394.581
396.081

1.50
3.00
4.50
6.00
7.50
9.00

0.003
0.012
0.027
0.048
0.075
0.108

91.783
91.843
91.903
91.963
92.023
92.083

SET -JU

Remarks

Beginning
of curve

91.780
91.831
91.876
91.915
91.948
91.975
Page 137

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

397.581
399.081
400.581
402.081
403.581
405.081
406.581
408.081
409.581
411.081
412.581
414.081
415.581
417.081

10.50
12.00
13.50
15.00
13.50
12.00
10.50
9.00
7.50
6.00
4.50
3.00
1.50
0.00

0.147
0.192
0.243
0.300
0.243
0.192
0.147
0.108
0.075
0.048
0.027
0.012
0.003
0.000

92.143
92.203
92.263
92.323
92.263
92.203
92.143
92.083
92.023
91.963
91.903
91.843
91.783
91.723

91.996
92.011
92.020
92.023
92.020
92.011
91.996
91.975
91.948
91.915
91.876
91.831
91.780
91.723

VIP 1

End
curve

of

Proposed Levels at various locations


SL No

1
2
3

SET -JU

Chainage
106.629
353.129
402.081

FRL
102.329
91.040
92.023

Remarks
Vip-01
Vip-01
Vip-01

Page 138

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 7
Design of Box Portion

SET -JU

Page 139

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Designing of Box portion


7.1 LOAD CALCULATIONS:
1 Dead Load
Self weight of top slab

0.45*1*30=13.50 KN/m2

Self weight of side wall

0.4*1*30=12.00 KN/m2

Self weight of bottom slab

0.4*1*30=12.00 KN/m2

2 Live load Surcharge


=30

=0

soil=20 KN /m3

=20

=90

water=10 KN /m3

ka = 0.297 from Coloumbs equation


live load surcharge

1.2*ka* =7.132 KN/m

3 Earth pressure

ka**h=42.70 KN /mt

4 Super imposed DL

1.44=2.00 KN /mt

5 Crash barrier load

=7.75 KN /mt

6 Soil over burden pressure

*h=119.0 KN /mt

7 vehicular live load:


70R Tracked
70R Wheeled
2Class A

SET -JU

Page 140

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Dry condition:- Load Condition


1.Self Weight
2.Live load Surcharge(Both side)
3. Live load Surcharge(One side)
4.Earth Pressure(dry)
5.Wearing coat
6.Crash Barrier
7.Soil over birden force
8.Temperature rise
9.Temperature fall
Comb-1=1+2+4+5+6
Comb-2=1+3+4+5+6
Comb-3=Com-1+8
Comb-4=Com-2+8
Comb-5=Com-1+9
Comb-6=Com-2+9

Load Factors
AS PER IRC6:2010, TABLE 3.2, PAGE NO69, THE LOAD FACTORS ARE UNDER
1)Dead load

=1.35

2)Wearing coat

=1.75

3)LL Surcharge

=1.2

4)Earth Pressure

=1.5

5)Crash Pressure

=1.35

6)Buoyancy Force

=0.15

7)Water Pressure

=1

SET -JU

Page 141

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

8)Temperature rise

=1

9)VLL

=1.5

IMPACT FACTOR:
70R-TRACKED

10%

70R-WHEELED

25%

Class A

30%

70R WHEELED

SET -JU

Page 142

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Support Condition:
SBC of soil considered = 450kn/m2
Vertical sub grade modulus = 40*SF*qa (Ref.page 503 ,joseph E.bowles)
= 40*2.5*100
Spring constants = 45000 KN/m
The 2-D Analysis is carried out using Staad pro. And the forces are noted at critical
points for the Design of section.

Sections Considered:
TOP SLAB:

CENTER WALL

1-1 Center of wall

11-11 Center of top slab

2-2 Face of wall

12-12 Soffit of top slab

3-3 End of Haunch

13-13 Center of wall

4-4 Center of slab

14-14 At bottom haunch


15-15 Face of bottom slab
16-16 Bottom slab level

SIDE WALL

BOTTOM SLAB

5-5

Center of top slab

17-17 Center of wall

6-6

Soffit of top slab

18-18 Face of wall

7-7

Center of wall

19-19 End of haunch

8-8

At bottom haunch

20-20 Center of bottom slab

SET -JU

Page 143

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

9-9

Face of bottom slab

10-10 Bottom slab level

Effective width of dispersion


Following method is adopted for calculating beff, load position resulting
maximum BM from Staad pro is noted. Effective width of dispersion is calculated
for the load position by considering CG of the loading on deck corresponding to
the critical value of BM.
Consideration of vehicles for design
A)70R Tracked vehicle
B)70R Wheeled vehicles
C)Class A two Vehicles
1)Check for adequacy of top slab thickness
Summary of bending moments:
(Without Temperature)
1-1
Comb-1
130.46
Comb-2
125.93
Comb-3
0
Comb-4
0
Max BM
130.46
Values included is excluding VLL

2-2
105.84
118.6
0
0
118.6

3-3
130.33
149.36
0
0
149.36

4-4
185.67
208.3
0
0
208.3

BM due to VLL
VLL
70R
Wheeled
Beff
BM
Max BM
SET -JU

(L/C)
70

1-1
327.3

2-2
406.225

3-3
348.75

4-4
555.6

5.37
60.984
60.984

5.37
75.689
75.689

5.37
64.980
64.980

5.37
103.522
103.522
Page 144

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

With Temperature (rise)


1-1
131.09
123.71
0.00
0.00
131.03

Comb-5
Comb-6
Comb-7
Comb-8
Max BM

2-2
105.48
111.42
0.00
0.00
111.42

3-3
130.82
147.01
0.00
0.00
147.01

4-4
186.57
205.44
0.00
0.00
205.44

3-3
135.51
151.70
0.00
0.00
151.70

4-4
192.28
211.15
0.00
0.00
211.15

With Temperature (fall)


1-1
Comb-9
135.52
Comb-10
128.15
Comb-11
0.00
Comb-12
0.00
Max BM
135.52
Consider Max BM values

2-2
109.70
115.70
0.00
0.00
115.78

GRADE OF CONCRETE

= M-30

GRADE OF STEEL

=Fe-500

CLEAR COVER

=40

DIA OF MAIN BAR

=Y-16

DIA OF DISTR BAR

=Y-10

MU/b*d*d

=0.013*fck

Dreq

Sqrt(mu/Q*b)

Astreq=

1 - (4.6Mu/(fck * b * d * d) )

As per IRC:112-2011,CL:16.5.1.1,pg no 175,


ASMIN=0.26*(fctm/fyk)*bt*d>0.001*3bt*d

Design of Top slab (main reinforcement)


SET -JU

Page 145

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Without Temperature
Max BM due
to DL without
temp
MAX VLL
Bending
moment
Design BM
dreq
dpro
Check

1-1
130.46

2-2
118.60

3-3
149.36

4-4
208.30

60.98

75.69

64.98

103.52

191.44
219.05
402.00
Safe

194.29
220.67
402.00
Safe

214.34
231.77
402.00
Safe

311.82
279.55
402.00
safe

With Temperature IN both case with temperature case is max


Max BM due
to DL with
temp
MAX VLL
Bending
moment
Design BM
dreq
dpro
Check

1-1
135.52

2-2
115.78

3-3
151.70

4-4
211.15

60.98

75.69

64.98

103.52

196.50
206.94
402.00
Safe

191.47
204.27
402.00
Safe

216.68
217.31
402.00
Safe

314.67
261.87
402.00
safe

Design of distribution steel:


Max BM due
to DL without
temp
Max BM due
to DL with
temp
SET -JU

(0.2*DL)+(0.3*LL)

1-1
26.09

2-2
23.72

3-3
29.87

4-4
41.66

27.10

23.16

30.34

42.23

Page 146

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

MAX VLL
Bending
moment
Design BM
dreq
dpro
Check

SET -JU

18.30

22.71

19.49

31.06

45.40
106.67
389.00
Safe

46.43
107.87
389.00
Safe

49.83
111.76
389.00
Safe

73.29
135.53
389.00
safe

Page 147

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 8
Discussions and Conclusions

SET -JU

Page 148

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

Chapter - 8
Discussions and Conclusions

8.1 General
Bangalore city is the fast growing metropolitan city in India, due
to this traffic volume rate is increasing enormously in the city and every
traffic junction is getting congested. Though fly-over, under-pass, metrorails has been constructed still the traffic volume rate and delay time is
on increasing side.

Magadi and basaveshwara road junction has been identified to estimate


the traffic volume as on 1st week of April, which indicates the peak hour
traffic volume of 8340 PCU/hr. Air pollution at this junction is
considerably increasing and will be further increased over the years.
8.2 Conclusion
From the results obtained, Underpass has to be constructed in order reduce
the traffic volume rate and delay time at Magadi and Basaveshwara road
junction.

SET -JU

Page 149

Designing of Retaining Wall and Box Portion of Underpass 2014

A 4 lane divided bi-directional carriageway and an underpass at the junction


has to be made. And the provision of underpass provides relief in the traffic
flow across the junction for the highest PCU values.
Looking at the future of the junction in terms of carbon footprint, use of ecofriendly vehicles for transportation has to be promoted.

References
1. As per IRC 006 2000, Standard specifications and code of practice for
Road Bridges.
2. As per IRC 86 1983, Geometrical Design Standards for Urban Roads in
Plains.
3. As per SP 16, 1980, Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS
4. As per IS 456 2000.
5. Manual Specifications and Standards.
6. Reinforced Cement Concrete, Krishna Raju.
7. Topographic Survey Drawing.
8. Documents of NIT.
9. Google Maps.

SET -JU

Page 150

Anda mungkin juga menyukai