Ali S. Rangwala
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
August 3, 2012
Motivation
Maxima of both the flame-spread rate and mass-loss rate are
used to determine the fire hazards of materials
These quantities are both dependent on orientation
Flame spread is still not well understood for:
Forest fires (e.g. inclined slopes)
Warehouse fires
Undersides of burning roofs
August 3, 2012
Fire spread
Fire spread occurs because of
transfer of thermal energy
from flames to virgin fuel
qf ( x, t )
Excess
Pyrolyzate
t ~ xn
Vp
yf
qp
mf H cQ
xf
xp
August 3, 2012
Experimental setup
August 3, 2012
Effects of orientation
*Video
August 3, 2012
Spread Velocity
0.09
Underside measurements
(-60 to 0) have not been
reported before
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
Vp (This study, w=10cm)
0.02
0.01
0
1.
2.
3.
Pizzo (model)
Pizzo (exp, w=20cm)
Drydale and Macmillian (w=6cm)
Xie and DesJardin (model)
-60
-45
-30
0
30
Angle of Inclination,
45
60
August 3, 2012
1.
2.
August 3, 2012
Steady Burning
10
Mass-loss Rate (g/m2s)
0.09
0.08
0.06
0.05
0.09
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.07
Spread
Rate,
Rate,
Spread
Vp V(cm/s)
p (cm/s)
0.07
Pizzo
(model)
0.06
Pizzo (exp, w=20cm)
Drydale
and Macmillian (w=6cm)
0.05
Xie and DesJardin (model)
0.04 -45
-60
-30
0
30
Angle
of
Inclination,
Angle of Inclination,
45
7
6
5
4
PMMA, Spreading
3
2
-60
60
-45
-30
30
45
60
Angle
of
Inclination,
0.03
Vp (This Study, w=10cm)
0.02
Pizzo (Model)
Pizzo (Exp, w=20cm)
Drydale and Macmillian (w=6cm)
Xie and DesJardin (Model)
0.01
0
-80
1.
2.
3.
-60
-40
-20
0
20
Angle of Inclination,
40
60
80
August 3, 2012
Radiant-Flux Estimates
Total Heat Flux (estimated from
mass-loss rates)
Maximum heat flux in
combusting plume
Estimated radiant contribution
(from heat flux gauges)
rr
q q m H p
qrr Tp 4 6.1 kW/m2
August 3, 2012
Radiant-Flux Estimates
September 1, 2014
August 3, 2012
10
10
Flame-Standoff Distance
August 3, 2012
11
Flame-Standoff Distance
August 3, 2012
12
Flame Shape
August 3, 2012
13
Width Effects
August 3, 2012
14
Heat-Flux Profiles
15
10
2
1
0.5
0.25
-60o
-45o
-30o
0o
30o
45o
60o
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.2
x / xp
Power-law fit:
August 3, 2012
qf ( x) A( x / x p )n
Experimental Study of Upward Flame Spread of an Inclined Fuel Surface
15
Conclusions
Flame-spread rates were found to be greatest in
near-vertical orientations while burning rates are
maximized in near-horizontal orientations.
Qualitative trends, including the spread-rate
maximum at angles slightly less than vertical, are
general and should also apply in strictly 2D
configurations in the size range studied or larger.
August 3, 2012
16
Acknowledgements
Alexander Marcacci, Ulrich Neimann and Mario
Zuniga for their contributions to laboratory
experiments
John de Ris, Jose Torero, Adam Cowlard and Yuji
Nakamura for valuable discussions
Support from the Society of Fire Protection Engineers
Supported by:
Society of Fire Protection Engineers
Educational and Scientific Foundation
August 3, 2012
17
18
Tsai, K. (2009). Width effect on upward flame spread. Fire Safety Journal, 44(7), 962-967.
August 3, 2012
20
qi qc qr qsto qc ,st
qi
qc
qr
qc , st
qsto
21
q constant
q = constant
22
-60o
50
50
50
40
40
40
30
30
30
Y-location (cm)
-45o
10
15
-30o
10
15
0o
50
40
40
40
30
30
30
15
45o
10
10
15
15
1500
1000
30o
50
10
2000
5
50
Heat Flux
W/m2
500
10
15
60o
50
90o
50
50
40
40
30
30
5
10
15
40
30
5
10
15
10
15
X-location (cm)
August 3, 2012
23
Sensor Locations
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
September 1, 2014
10
12
14
16
18
20
24
TC Readings 0
August 3, 2012
25
TC Readings 60
August 3, 2012
26
TC Readings -60
August 3, 2012
27
August 3, 2012
28