E D U C A T I O N
2 7
TOUATI
NOVEMBER/DECEMBER
14
9
Numerous studies have confirmed the predictability of dental implants used for the
replacement of a single missing tooth. Successful application of this surgical protocol
is still technique sensitive and should be executed only by experienced restorative
teams. Factors such as implant stability, implant design, immediate loading, provisionalization, and various others have a direct influence on the result of this
procedure. This article reviews current literature on immediate implant placement
and provides clinical guidelines aimed at improving the use of this technique in
daily restorative practice.
Key Words: implant, immediate provisionalization, soft tissues, osseointegration, aesthetics
*Editor-in-Chief, Practical Procedures & Aesthetic Dentistry; private practice, Paris, France.
Private
Bernard Touati, DDS, DSO, The Dental Institute, 33 Rue de Prony, 75017 Paris, France
Tel: 011- 33-1-56-33-2300 Fax: 011- 33-1-47- 64-1425 E-mail: esthdent@club-internet.fr
699
700
Touati
PPAD
701
Table
Clinical Translation of ISQ Values*
ISQ
Clinical Translation
< 50
Insufficient Stability
50 to 60
Good Stability
> 60
Excellent Stability
*For Replace (Nobel Biocare, Yorba Linda, CA) implants.
702
Figure 10A. Preoperative radiographic evaluation demonstrates the position of the fractured lateral incisor requiring
extraction. 10B. Immediate postoperative radiograph
demonstrates implant placement (Replace Select, Nobel
Biocare, Yorba Linda, CA).
Touati
Clinical Considerations
Guidelines For Immediate Implantation
It is clear that immediate implantation can no longer
be considered as an experimental technique. Numerous
studies show medium- and long-term survival rates comparable to those for conventional techniques involving
delayed implantation.15-19 The clinical parameters (eg,
appearance of tissues surrounding the implant, bleeding,
probing) and histological parameters also demonstrate
an identical appearance to those of delayed implants.20,21
One of the principal advantages of the immediate
technique is the prevention of postextraction bone resorption. According to Carlsson 22, this bone loss may affect
approximately 23% of the anterior alveolar crest during
the six months following extraction. The literature
PPAD
703
Figure 14. The emergence profile was completed. The provisional restoration was sandblasted and covered with a
light-cured varnish (Palaseal, Heraeus Kulzer, Armonk, NY).
A
Figure 16. One-week postoperative view of the provisional
restoration with optimal tissue healing. The length of the
provisional restoration was slightly reduced to protect the
implant during incisal guidance.
704
Touati
Immediate Replacement
Research on the preservation of the tissue architecture,
the reduction of surgical sequences, the augmentation of
patient comfort during provisionalization, and greater
aesthetic requirements31 have led many practitioners to
consider immediate replacement of the missing or freshly
extracted tooth. Studies and clinical reports alike demonstrate the increasing interest of dental professionals in this
technique for the aesthetic zone.34- 37 These various studies allow the authors to develop and to present a set
of criteria for evaluation and implementation that should
be rigorously followed to optimize the chances for success of the technique.
PPAD
705
Clinical Implications
It follows from this analysis that objective control of implant
stability (eg, via RFA), in combination with the application
of a controlled insertion torque, is essential for confirming
the possibility of immediate replacement as early as the
installation of the implant. Furthermore, it seems advisable
that, whenever technically possible, the implant should
be splinted with the adjacent natural teeth in order to limit
micromovement at the bone/implant interface. The connection to two or three adjacent teeth on each side of
the implant, with fibers and composite, for example,
706
Touati
Conclusion
In a previous article on the immediate replacement of a
single tooth, the authors wrote: Since the maintenance
of the existing anatomical structures is easier than their
re-creation, it has even been advocated to perform provisionalization with a pseudoloaded prosthesis immediately
following stage I surgery in immediate tooth replacement
although this procedures is still experimental.31 Immediate
replacement, while no longer experimental, nevertheless
remains challenging and requires careful case selection
(ie, preimplant identification of unfavorable factors), a
rigorous observance of the criteria for success, flawless
technical execution, serious collaboration with the patient,
and strict professional maintenance.
Long-term multicenter prospective studies would be
useful in confirming the reliability of the technique, identifying factors to optimize it, and to define its limitations.
The evolution toward the combination of immediate
implantation and early loading techniques, however,
appears to represent the most adequate solution for solving concerns inherent in single-tooth replacement for the
aesthetic zone. Progress in the areas of implant design
(ie, scalloped neck), surgical technique, and strict control
of the implant stability will help further increase the reliability of this technique.
References
1. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH.
Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Impl Res
2000;11(1):12-25.
2. Cameron CE. The cracked tooth syndrome: Additional findings.
J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93(5):971-975.
3. Soballe K. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation. Mechanical and histological studies in dogs. Acta Orthop
Scand Suppl 1993;255:1-58.
4. Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCammond D. Finite element analysis of crestal bone loss around porous-coated dental implants.
J Appl Biomater 1995;6(4):267-282.
5. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental
implant surface. Clin Mater 1992;10(3):153-201.
6. Taborelli M, Jobin M, Francois P, et al. Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (I) Surface characterization. Clin Oral
Impl Res 1997;8(3):208-216.
7. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, et al. Immediate functional loading
of Brnemark single tooth implants. An 18 months clinical pilot
follow-up study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000;11(1):26-33.
8. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1992;
7(1):62-71.
9. Albrektsson T, Eriksson AR, Friberg B, et al. Histologic investigations on 33 retrieved Nobelpharma implants. Clin Mater 1993;
12(1):1- 9.
10. Friberg B, Sennerby L. Grondahl K, et al. On cutting torque
measurements during implant placement: A 3-year clinical prospective study. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 1999;1(2):75-83.
11. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The
osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15(2):152,154-156.
12. Brunski JB. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion
of intraosseous implants. Dent Impl Update 1993;4(10):77- 81.
13. Hui E, Chow J, Li D, et al. Immediate provisional for single-tooth
implant replacement with Brnemark system: Preliminary report.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3(2):79-86.
PPAD
707
CONTINUING EDUCATION
(CE) EXERCISE NO. 27
CE
27
CONTINUING EDUCATION
To submit your CE Exercise answers, please use the answer sheet found within the CE Editorial Section of this issue and complete as follows:
1) Identify the article; 2) Place an X in the appropriate box for each question of each exercise; 3) Clip answer sheet from the page and mail it
to the CE Department at Montage Media Corporation. For further instructions, please refer to the CE Editorial Section.
The 10 multiple-choice questions for this Continuing Education (CE) exercise are based on the article: Immediate implantation with provisionalization: From literature to clinical implications by Bernard Touati, DDS, DSO, and Gerard Guez, DDS. This article is on Pages 699-707.
Learning Objectives:
This article reviews current literature on immediate implant placement and provides clinical guidelines aimed at improving the use of this technique in daily restorative practice. Upon reading this article and completing this exercise, the reader should:
Be able to identify those cases favorable for immediate or early implant loading.
Know the clinical parameters associated with the procedure.
Have an increased awareness of the various criteria involved in a successful implantation.
1. According to the Osstell system, the ISQ defines
insufficient stability as:
a. Less than or equal to 25.
b. Less than 50.
c. Less than or equal to 60.
d. Greater than 60.
2. Which of the following is a benefit of immediate
implantation with provisionalization?
a. Improved psychological advantages.
b. Preservation of tissue and optimization of the soft
tissue contour.
c. Enhanced patient comfort and aesthetics.
d. All of the above.
3. The degree of tolerance of micromovements at the
bone/implant interface is :
a. 100 m for smooth surfaces, 50 m to 150 m for
rough surfaces.
b. 50 m for smooth surfaces, 25 m to 125 m for
rough surfaces.
c. 150 m for smooth surfaces, 100 m to 200 m for
rough surfaces.
d. 75 m for smooth surfaces, 50 m to 200 m for
rough surfaces.
4. Which cases can be considered for immediate or
early loading?
a. Cases with splinted implants and poor bone density.
b. Cases with dense bone only.
c. Cases with dense bone and splinted images.
d. Cases with splinted implants only.
5. According to microscopic study, the coadaptation
stability of an implant depends on:
a. The interlocking between mineralized bone and
the smoothness of the implant surface.
b. The interlocking of a chemical bond.
c. The interlocking between the roughness of the implant
surface and the mineralized bone.
d. The interlocking of the implant surface to a chemical bond.
708