Anda di halaman 1dari 3

The current commercial process in the world today is a game, is created entirely in the realm of

FICTION, operating as private law and private contract between legal fictions, i.e., Countries (Nations,)
Corporations, and straw men (Individuals/Sole Proprietors.)
Todays operational jurisdiction is private law, called public policy, not public law as existed in the
Republic. To make his way in the Real world a living being, who cannot enter, operate in, or be in the realm of
the fictitious and imaginary, needs a commercial vessel.
Such a vessel is the straw man.
Inasmuch as law must always provide a remedy, when US Inc. declared bankruptcy in 1933, it had to
structure a means for living people to appear in their private, proper capacity and deal with whatever claims
might arise. The result is that all claims must be resolved through private administrative process to
determine whether or not the public sector (public policy) has jurisdiction in a given matter.
Consequently, in order to properly bring or deal with an action in the public sector, the private,
administrative remedies must properly be exhausted first. The real being cannot perfect his claim and assert
any standing as a creditor in the absence of perfecting the private administrative process, hereinafter PAP,
first.
Inasmuch as all courts today are admiralty-equity tribunals, the universal principles of equity are
operational. These principles include such maxims of equity as:
1.

He who comes into a court of equity must come with clean hands. 79 Fed. Rep. 854; 97 Tenn.
180; 11 Tex. Civ. App. 624.

2.

He who has committed iniquity shall not have equity. Francis, 2d Max.

3.

Equity denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing, which would
regulate the intercourse of men with men.

4.

Equity suffers no right without a remedy.

5.

Equality is equity.

6.

Equity follows the law.

7.

He who seeks equity must do equity.

8.

He who seeks equity must have clean hands.

9.

Equity will not permit a party to profit by his own wrong.

10.

To receive equity one must give equity.

If, in an action, both parties are in dishonor, both have failed to give equity and have proceeded
without clean hands. In such a case, the judge has unbridled discretion, since he is dealing with two losers
from inception. The judge must then do is what his exclusive duty is in any case, uphold public policy and
collect revenue for paying the insurance policy premiums to keep the bankrupt corporation afloat.
The solution, therefore, is never to dishonor, i.e., always do equity and act with clean hands, and
perfect your claim in the private, administrative realm at the outset of a dispute. By so doing, you have
availed yourself of the remedy in law and exhausted your administrative remedies. At this point, should the
matter enter a court and be put before a judge, you will be the one with a perfected claim on the private side
and also the only party with clean hands, having done equity and acted in honor and good faith.

Because administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to a matter entering the judicial arena, as
long as you are doing administrative procedure, the public officials cannot proceed with any court action
against the straw man.
The administrative process consists of having your notary send (you should always send and receive
all paperwork by and through a friendly and knowledgeable notary) notice of your position to all of the
parties, i.e., Respondents, who are assaulting your straw man with demands, obligations, and charges. Said
Respondents are sent your private, administrative notices in the private capacity of all concerned, so that you
are operating as a real being sending notices to other real beings. The nature of your paperwork is that
without dishonoring (denying, traversing, faultfinding, etc.), you require that your adversary put up or shut
up. In other words, you send your adversaries, in private capacity, conditional acceptances and negative
averments that in essence state:
I have no idea whether your claims and charges are bona fide or not, or whether I have a valid obligation
to satisfy the obligations you assert, but I am not aware of any evidence substantiating your position in
any of these matters and if you claim that your demands are valid, provide documentary proof of claim for
the record and I will comply with whatever you have substantiated.

It is essential to remember that the entire current judicial system functions by stipulations, i.e.,
agreements, between disputing parties. Either stipulations occur by the two parties openly agreeing on a
particular point or, if they do not, the discovery and trial process resulting in stipulations based on the ruling
of the judge, i.e., the discretionary conscience of the court.
The entire legal/commercial process today is a game, the essential rule of which is: Whoever
dishonors first loses. Or, phrased differently, No one who dishonors can be assured of prevailing. In short,
if you wish to win you must proceed without dishonoring, or there is no guarantee you will prevail and, what
is worse, if your adversary is the system itself, you are automatically guaranteed to lose because the judge
must faithfully adhere to his Prime Directive: Uphold public policy and collect revenue for the bankruptcy
reorganization.
Your private administrative process must operate as follows:
1.

Do everything by affidavit or asseveration, notarized.

2.

Use a notary for everythingsending out all of your paperwork, receiving responses,
keeping the notarial logbook, retaining copies of everything sent and received, executing
such notarial documents as those involved in a notary protest, etc.

3.

Have your notary send your adversaries your notices in the private capacity of all involved
parties.

4.

Never dishonor or traverse, which you can do by enjoining (commenting on, whether
admitting or denying) any of the content, i.e., subject matter, in their communications, as
well as by ignoring what you receive (failing to respond within the time frames required).
Remember the definition of traverser from Blacks Law Dictionary: In pleading, one who
traverses or denies. A prisoner or party indicted; so called from his traversing the
indictment. Regard the content of their documents as their truth or fantasy, which, in either
case, is not your position/truth and therefore not your business to comment on one way or
another, other than as above, maybe what you say is true, but if so, prove it. Then you have
not dishonored by ignoring, nor traversed by commenting on their statements.

5.

Remember the maxim of law: The burden of proof resides on him who asserts, not on one
against whom a claim or charge is made. They initiated the matter and are demanding
something from you, not the reverse. Therefore, in the Private Administrative Process the
burden of proof concerning the validity of their assertions rests with them, not you.

6.

Invoke the principle of acquiescence by silence, i.e., by the terms and conditions of the
interchange, their failure to put up or shut up within the time frame you allow for them to
prove their claims constitutes their stipulation (agreement) that your position is true,
correct, and complete in entirety and they are devoid of proof of claim for anything theyve
alleged against the straw man.

7.

After you have consummated your private administrative process, proceed to the public side
by invoking the notary for the notarial protest process, at the end of which you have the
following established as documentary proof on the record:

a.

A private (from you) and public (from the notary) exhaustion of administrative remedies;

b.

A complete set of stipulations by them in support of your position;

c.

Private, commercial, and judicial summary judgment and judgment in estoppel on the law,
facts, and money.

Their stipulations established by the foregoing process include their admission and confession, i.e.,
confession of judgment, that:
1.

You are the creditor and not a debtor concerning the transaction;

2.

There is no evidence that they are the creditor;

3.

They owe you, and you can bill them for, the sum-certain amount set forth in the paperwork;

4.

They have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted;

5.

Any and all proceeding against you thereafter constitutes a libel on the public record
authorizing your filing a libel of review in the (general) admiralty against all parties in their
private capacity, devoid of official immunity;

6.

They and all others are hereafter forever estopped from raising the issue, contesting the
stipulations, or proceeding against you in any way concerning what has been finalized.

After completion of the above, you can file your administrative judgment with the appropriate
Recorder, and thereafter record a certified copy of the filed judgment on a UCC-1 or UCC-3.
Remember that your notary constitutes a disinterested third-party witness. When the notary, an
agent of the State and the court, enters the public side with your private information, your position appears
on the public record.
Thereafter, any form of court action against your straw man would constitute self-validating proof,
based on the public record that has been established, that any and all involved parties are acting
inequitably and with unclean hands. If you have any form of court proceeding asserted against you, show the
judge that he has only one course of action based on the record.
Once the Private Administrative Process has been completed, then all manner of remedies and
recourses exist for you that formerly did not and could not. These include a habeas corpus, criminal affidavits,
maritime liens, and other remedies.