Materials Letters
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matlet
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 12 January 2012
Accepted 21 February 2012
Available online 3 March 2012
Keywords:
Carbon nanotubes
Nano-pores
Microstructure
Firing voltage
MgO
Thin lms
Secondary electron emission
a b s t r a c t
This study reports on the ion-induced secondary electrons emission (SEE) from MgO lms deposited on multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). MWCNTs are grown on quartz substrates using plasma enhanced
chemical vapor deposition system and MgO lms are deposited on that MWCNTs using electron-beam evaporation technique. The SEE coefcients are obtained from experimentally measured ring voltage. We observed stabilized and lower ring voltage of MgO lms deposited on MWCNTs than that for MgO. The
experimental results suggest that the density, uniformity and alignment of nanotubes inuence the local
electric eld in nano-pores of MgO lms which in turn affects the emission of secondary electrons from
MgO surface.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The study of secondary electron emission mechanism from MgO
materials has been a matter of great importance as it plays signicant
role in decreasing the operating voltage and increasing the life-time
and luminescence of plasma display panels (PDPs). The high secondary electron emission of MgO is important in lowering the ring voltage while low sputtering yield provides long life time [1]. Wide range
of interesting applications of MgO thin lms has led to the emphasis
on increasing the SEE () coefcient as high as possible. Ultra high
coefcient (~ 123) from single walled nanotubes has been reported
by Luo et al. [2]. And, more recently M. K. Alam et al. (2011) measured
the coefcient around 1 for single MWCNTs and concluded that
depends on the number of walls, internal structure of CNT forest and
nanotube density in forest [3,4]. Very high coefcient of CNTs has
paved the way to make MgO/CNT combination to increase the of
MgO. Indeed, an enormously high electron-induced yield (~1500)
for MgO/CNTs has been reported in literature [5]. MgO is an insulating
material and its high resistivity slows down the electron emission
through its lm. Inclusion of CNTs in MgO changes its geometrical
structure. High aspect ratios and small tip radius of CNTs may cause
a high eld across the MgO lm and an increase in yield [6]. In the
present work, idea of using two different densities of CNTs has been
developed to study the discharge characteristics of MgO lms. For
our experiment, MWCNTs are grown on quartz substrates by plasma
enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), followed by deposition
of MgO lm using electron-beam evaporation technique. Ion-induced
of MgO and MgO/MWCNT lms are measured.
2. Experimental details
MWCNTs were grown on quartz substrates using PECVD process. A
thin layer of Ti (~500 A) followed by Ni (~40 A), which acts as the catalyst layer was deposited by e-beam evaporation. Ti and Ni coated
quartz substrates were annealed to 800 C in a vacuum so that nickel
layer breaks into very small islands. These small islands of nickel act
as catalysts for the growth of the MWCNTs. A hydrogen plasma treatment was performed on Ni lms for 10 min to remove oxides and dangling bond. This H2-plasma treatment further breaks Ni islands into
nano-clusters. A mixture of C2H2 and H2 with ratio 20:80 is used to
grow MWCNTs. Oxygen treatment for 30 min was done to remove
amorphous carbon from the walls of MWCNTs. Thin MgO lms of
1 m in thickness were deposited by e-beam evaporation on MWCNT
coated quartz substrates. Three different samples of MgO, MgO/
MWCNTs (1) and MgO/MWCNTs (2) were prepared to study the effect
of MWCNTs on SEE from MgO lms. In MgO/MWCNTs (1) sample, CNTs
were less dense as compared to sample MgO/MWCNTs (2).
132
0:5 Cdiel
C
V ref V
Cgap 0:5 Cdiel s Cdiel R
2
1
2
Vf D :p:d = ln C:p:d=ln
1
where Cdiel is capacitance of MgO lm, Cgap is capacitance of gap between the cell and Cref is capacitance of reference capacitor. Where p
HV
Electrode
Glass
Spacer
Surface
Discharge
MgO
Cdiel
Cgap
Cdiel
Cref
Reference
Capacitor
Fig. 1. The schematic of the ion-induced SEE measurement setup. The equivalent electrical circuit of cross section of discharge cell present the various capacitors (where
Cdiel = capacitance of MgO, Cgap = capacitance of gap between cell formed with two
MgO lms Cref = reference capacitor).
Fig. 2. (a) SEM image of sample MgO/MWCNT (1) (b) SEM image of sample MgO/
MWCNT (2).
and are not well aligned. SEM image of sample MgO/MWCNTs (2)
shows uniform, highly dense and well aligned CNTs as depicted in
Fig. 2(b). A comparison between the experimentally measured ring
voltage of MgO and MgO/MWCNTs lms at different neon gas pressure is shown in Fig. 3(a). A marked reduction in ring voltage for
MgO/MWCNTs can be observed in Fig. 3(a). Firing voltage for MgO/
MWCNTs lms decreases with the increase in discharge pressure
and becomes constant in range 510 Torr.cm. While for MgO lms, ring voltage rst decreases with the increase in discharge pressure and
then again starts increasing at high discharge pressure as illustrated in
Fig. 3(a). This observed change in the trend of the curve may be because of the structural change in MgO/MWCNT lms, which affect
the SEE process. Experimentally obtained Paschen curves of MgO
and MgO/MWCNTs lms are compared with the theoretically calculated ring voltage using Eq. (2) to deduce the ion-induced SEE coefcient as presented in Fig. 3(a). MgO lm shows lower coefcient
(~0.07) which becomes constant (~0.10) at p.d equals 10 Torr.cm.
Both MgO/MWCNT lms show higher coefcient than pure MgO
lm. However, higher coefcient is measured for sample MgOs/
MWCNTs (2) as compared to MgO/MWCNTs (1). For sample MgO/
MWCNTs (1), there was not much improvement in coefcient
(~0.08) at lower gas discharge pressure but with increasing pressure
it showed enhancement in coefcient and reached at ~ 0.23 for
p.d = 10 Torr.cm. Whereas, for sample MgO/MWCNTs (2), we found
coefcient 0.40 at p.d = 10 Torr.cm, which may be because of well
aligned and dense CNTs. We obtained ion-induced yield between
0.20 and 0.40 for MgO/MWCNTs, which is higher than previously
reported value (~0.1) by Won Tae Lee et al. [9]. Effective SEE (eff) of
these lms has been calculated, and results are shown in Fig. 3(b).
eff is higher than coefcient because it also includes the emitted
SEs due to the interaction with photons and other charged particles.
The value of eff for MgO/MWCNTs (2) varies from 0.40 to 0.60
while it ranges in 0.250.43 for MgO/MWCNTs (1). At E/
133
Fig. 3. (a) Experimental Paschen curves, ring voltage (Vf) versus (p d) measured for
MgO (open circle + line), MgO/MWCNTs (1) (open square + dash line) and MgO/
MWCNTs (2) lms (lled triangle + line). The dot and dashed lines represent the theoretically calculated Paschen curves using xed value of . (b) Effective secondary electron emission (eff ) as a function of E/p, where E corresponds to ring voltage and p is
pressure. Figure shows MgO (lled circle + line), MgO/MWCNTs (1) (open square +
dot line) and MgO/MWCNTs (2) lms (lled triangle + dash line).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank SCDT, IIT Kanpur and Council for
Scientic and Industrial Research, India, Ministry of Information
Technology, New Delhi, India for funding this research.
134
References
[1] Boeuf JP. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2003;36:R5379.
[2] Luo J, Warner JH, Feng C, Yao Y, Jin Z, Wang H, et al. Appl Phys Lett 2010;96:
213113.
[3] Alam MK, Yaghoobi P, Chang M, Nojeh A. Appl Phys Lett 2010;97:26190.
[4] Alam MK, Yoghoobi P, Nojeh A. J Vac Sci Technol B 2011;29:041803.
[5] Yi W, Yu SG, Lee W, Han IT, Jeong T, Woo Y, et al. J Appl Phys 2001;89:40915.
[6] Heo JN, Kim WS, Jeong TW, Yu SG, Lee JH, Lee CS, et al. Physica B 2002;323:1746.
[7] Ram SK, Barik UK, Sarkar S, Biswas P, Singh V, Dwivedi HK, et al. Thin Solid Films
2009;517:62525.
[8] Bachmann PK, Elsbergen VV, Wiechart DU, Zhang D, Robertson J. Diamond Relat
Mater 2001;10:80917.
[9] Lee WT, Im SJ, Han JG, Yu SG, Kim HY, Han IT, et al. J Appl Phys 2002;41:65502.
[10] Kim WS, Yi W, Yu SG, Heo J, Jeong T, Lee J, et al. Appl Phys Lett 2002;81:1098100.
[11] Jacobs H, Freely J, Brand FA. Phys Rev 1952;88:4929.
[12] Straumal BB, Protasova SG, Mazilkin AA, Baretzky B, Myatiev AA, Straumal PB,
et al. Mater Lett 2012;71:214.
[13] Mckenna KP, Shluger AL. Phys Rev B 2009;79:224116.
[14] Kim YS, Yoon SH, Ahn SG, Hong CR, Yang H. Electron Mater Lett 2008;4:11329.
[15] Ha CH, Kim JK, Whang KW. J Appl Phys 2007;101:123301.