DOI 10.1007/s10578-010-0179-0
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Abstract Adolescent Latinas continue to report higher levels of suicide attempts than
their African-American and White peers. The phenomenon is still not understood and is
theorized to be the result of the confluence of many cultural, familial, and individual level
factors. In Latino cultures, belief in the importance of the family, the value known as
familism, appears to protect youths emotional and behavioral health, but parent-adolescent conflict has been found to be a risk factor for suicide attempts. The role of familism in
relation to parent-adolescent conflict, self-esteem, internalizing behaviors, and suicide
attempts has not been studied extensively. To address this question, we interviewed 226
adolescent Latinas, 50% of whom had histories of suicide attempts. Using path analysis,
familism as a cultural asset was associated with lower levels of parent-adolescent conflict,
but higher levels of internalizing behaviors, while self-esteem and internalizing behaviors
mediated the relationship between parent-adolescent conflict and suicide attempts. Our
findings point to the importance of family involvement in culturally competent suicide
prevention and intervention programs. Reducing parent-daughter conflict and fostering
closer family ties has the added effect of improving self-esteem and shrinking the likelihood of suicide attempts.
Keywords Familism Parent adolescent conflict Internalizing behaviors
Self-esteem Suicide attempts Adolescent Latinas
Introduction
Since the early 1990s, national surveys of high school youth show that Latinas attempt
suicide at higher rates than their African American and White peers, both male and female
[1].This phenomenon has been recognized over time by multiple national studies, and so
123
426
far has not been found to be more prevalent in any one specific Hispanic1 ethnic group
[13]. As a previous attempt is the strongest predictor of completed suicide, and is a
leading cause of hospitalization, more research needs to be done to understand this public
health issue affecting Hispanic girls [4].
We may find many explanatory factors of the problem of suicide attempts by teenage
Hispanic girls by exploring the convergence of familial, developmental and cultural processes in the suicide attempts [5]. We follow the conceptual model advanced by Zayas
et al. [5] that posits a variety of individual, familial and socio-cultural factors are related to
the attempts of these girls. Based on the developmental theories of Vygotsky [6] and
Bronfenbrenner [7], the model highlights the interactions between Hispanic cultural values
and the relationships of girls and their families as being an integral part of understanding
the suicide attempts in this population. For this study, we focus on testing aspects of this
model by examining the relationships between cultural, familial, and individual level
constructs (i.e., familism, parentchild conflict, self-esteem, and internalizing behaviors)
with each other and with suicide attempts among an urban sample of Latinas.
123
427
123
428
123
429
Fig. 1 Path model predicting suicide attempts in adolescent Latinas. Note: positive and negative symbols
indicate the direction of the relationship between the variables
conflict), cultural factors (i.e., familism), and individual factors (i.e., self-esteem; internalizing behaviors). Our aims are to explore how these factors interact to protect or
potentiate suicidal behavior among Latinas in adolescence. Our primary research questions
are: What is the relationship between parent-adolescent conflict, self-esteem, internalizing
behaviors, and suicide attempts in Latina adolescents? What role does familism play as a
cultural asset in building self-esteem and protecting against parent-adolescent conflict,
internalizing behaviors, and suicide attempts? Building from the model proposed by Zayas
et al. [5], we examine the model depicted in Fig. 1. We test the following direct effects and
indirect effects (i.e., mediation effects) in the model.
Direct Relationships
1. Familism will be positively related to adolescent self-esteem and negatively related to
parent-adolescent conflict and internalizing behaviors.
2. Parent-adolescent conflict will be negatively related to self-esteem and positively
related to internalizing behaviors and suicide attempts.
3. Internalizing behaviors will be positively related to suicide attempts.
4. Self-esteem will be negatively related to suicide attempts.
5. Internalizing behaviors and self-esteem will be negatively associated with each other.
Indirect Relationships
1. Internalizing behaviors and self-esteem will mediate the relationship between familism
and suicide attempts.
123
430
2. Internalizing behaviors and self-esteem will both serve as mediators between parentadolescent conflict and suicide attempts .
3. Parent-adolescent conflict will mediate the relationship between familism and both
self-esteem and internalizing behaviors.
Method
This study used cross-sectional data from a project on the sociocultural processes in the
suicide attempts of adolescent Hispanic females. Participants in the study who had
reported having attempted suicide in the past 6 months were recruited in the New York
City area from social service agencies and general and psychiatric hospitals that serve
largely Hispanic populations. A comparison group of Latina adolescents with no known
histories of suicide attempts were also recruited through primary care health care
agencies and community programs from the same New York boroughs as the sample of
suicide attempters. Adolescent girls and participating parents were administered questionnaires with a number of standardized measures. About half of the girls and parents
also participated in an in-depth ethnographic interview. In this report, we utilize only
data from the scales administered to both groups of adolescents and their participating
parents.
We followed the definition of a suicide attempt as any non-fatal self-injury reported by
the adolescent after having made the attempt [57]. No adolescent was rejected on the basis
of the degree of lethality of the attempt. Potential participants were excluded from participation in the study if they were not between the ages of 11 and 19, had been diagnosed
with a severe mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia), substance abuse, mental retardation, or
living in foster care at the time of the project. Our recruitment sites were able to avoid
including any girls with co-morbid disorders.
All girls with suicidal histories were cleared for participation by their mental health
clinician, since they were all recruited from mental health services. All adolescent participants provided both assent and consent to participate, and their parents provided their
consent for both their adolescent daughters participation and their own, if they chose to
participate. Interviews were all conducted by doctorate and masters level clinicians, who
were bilingual and bicultural Hispanic women. The Human Research Protections Office at
Washington University in St. Louis approved all procedures.
Participants
A total of 121 adolescent Latina suicide attempters and 105 non-attempters were recruited.
Participants parents were recruited and completed study measures; 105 parents of suicide
attempters (86 mothers, 19 fathers) and 95 parents of non-attempters (78 mothers, 17
fathers) participated. The majority of our sample of girls (72%) was U.S.-born. Most girls
identified with a Hispanic group or culture: 79 Puerto Rican, 64 Dominican, 27 Mexican,
23 Colombian, 10 Ecuadorian, three Guatemalan, two Salvadorian, and one each Cuban,
Honduran, Peruvian, and Venezuelan. Eleven girls identified themselves as other (three
MexicanAmerican, three Puerto RicanDominican, one DominicanAmerican, one
DominicanCuban, one EcuadorianAmerican, one PeruvianPuerto Rican, and one Black
Puerto Rican) and three girls identified as American but were classified as Hispanic
based on their mothers Hispanic origin.
123
431
Variables
The adolescents age at the time of the interview was measured in years. For the purposes
of the current study, girls were categorized by self-report into the four largest subgroups
represented: Puerto Rican, Dominican, Mexican, and Colombian, and one group Other
Hispanic Culture, which included those girls from subgroups with smaller representation
in the sample, and who identified with more than one subgroup. Parent education was
assessed by asking the highest level of education completed by the parent who provided
consent for the adolescent.
Self-esteem was measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale [58]. It consists of ten
items that assess the adolescent respondents level of global self-esteem by scores ranging
from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-esteem. The Cronbachs
alpha scale of reliability for our sample was 0.86.
Internalizing Behaviors were measured using the internalizing behavior items included
in the Youth Self-Report [59]. Responses to these three-point Likert-scale questions
include not true, somewhat true, and very true or often true. Scores range from 0 to
48, with higher scores indicating higher levels of internalizing behaviors [59]. The
Cronbachs alpha for this subscale of the YSR in this study was 0.91.
Parent-adolescent conflict was measured by 15 dichotomous yes or no items from
the Conflict Behavior Questionnaire [60]. Instead of asking respondents to describe their
relationship with only one parent in these items, the questions probe the adolescents
description of both parents at once (e.g., My parent(s) dont understand me, and My
parent(s) are good friends to me.). Higher scores indicate increased levels of perceived
conflict and negative communication between the parent and adolescent, with scores
ranging from 0 to 15. The alpha coefficient for this scale in this study was 0.91.
Familism was measured with an attitudinal familism scale tapping familial support,
familial interconnectedness, familial honor, and subjugation of self to family [19]. Lugo
Steidel and Contreras report a full-scale Cronbachs alpha of 0.83; the alpha reported for
Latina adolescents in our study was 0.87.
Suicide attempter status was the outcome variable for the path. This is a binary variable,
coded as 1 for those girls who have attempted suicide and 0 for those who have never
attempted suicide.
Data Analysis Strategy
We used Mplus Version 5.2 [61] to run a path analysis to explore the direct and indirect
relationships hypothesized in our model. Control variables for path analysis included
parental education level, adolescent age, and Hispanic cultural group. A weighted least
squares estimator was used for the path analysis model, which calculates statistical differences in a model for both direct and indirect effects, and also provides the CFI/TLI,
RMSEA, and WRMR fit indices. Coefficients using this estimator yield are comparable to
regression betas with continuous outcomes and probit coefficients when there is a binary
outcome.
Missing data was handled using an inclusive multiple imputation strategy. Collins et al.
(2001) have shown this strategy to be the most successful in reducing, and in some cases
eliminating bias that otherwise would occur in listwise deletion and other ad-hoc missing
data methods (e.g., mean substitution). This strategy works particular well in scenarios
with little to modest missing data, which was the case for the variables in our model [62].
We generated the ten datasets using the ICE function, created by Royston [63] for STATA,
123
432
and then analyzed them using the TYPE = IMPUTED command in Mplus [61]. Besides
variables in our model, we used auxiliary variables either correlated with variables in the
model (e.g., public or private insurance) or potentially associated with missingness (i.e.,
social desirability) to create multiple datasets.
Results
Sample Demographics
All the adolescents were between the ages of 11 and 19 (M = 15.47, SD = 2.01). Suicide
attempters comprised 53.54% of the sample (n = 121), and 46.46% (n = 105) of the
sample had reported never having attempted suicide (non-attempters) in their lifetime. The
girls self-identified as being Puerto Rican (n = 79, 34.96%), Dominican (n = 64, 28.32%),
Mexican (n = 27, 11.95%), and Colombian (n = 23, 10.18%), with the remaining portion
of the participants (n = 33, 14.59%) reporting as being from other Hispanic cultures and
ethnic groups including Venezuelan, Cuban, Honduran, Ecuadorian, Salvadoran, Nicaraguan, or a combination of two groups. The education level of their parents ranged from
1 year of formal schooling to over 17 years (M = 10.57, SD = 3.66). Table 1 contains a
more detailed description of the sample.
The following information about the entire sample of adolescents is described below in
Table 1. Girls reported an average score 7.42 (SD = 1.19) for familism, with the lowest
score being 3.22 and the highest being 10.00 points. The mean score for parent-adolescent
conflict was 5.26 (SD = 4.59), with scores ranging from 0 (very little/no conflict) to 15
(the maximum score possible for the set of items). The average self-esteem score for the
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of Latina adolescent suicide attempters and non-attempters
Total sample Attempters (n = 121)
(N = 226)
Non-attempters
(n = 105)
M (n) SD
(%)
SD
t/v2 Values
SD
Age
15.47
2.01
15.33
1.80
Parent education
level
10.57
3.66
10.17
3.81
Puerto Rican
79.00
36.00 0.34
v2(1) = 0.04
Dominican
64.00
26.00 0.25
v2(1) = 1.22
Mexican
27.00
10.00 0.10
v2(1) = 1.10
Colombian
23.00
0.10
5.00 0.04
18.00 0.17
v2(1) = 10.41**
Other ethnicity
33.00
15.00 0.14
v2(1) = 0.02
Ethnicity
Familism
7.42
1.19
7.33
1.31
Parentadolescent
conflict
5.20
4.61
6.59
4.84
Internalizing
20.67 11.13
25.98 10.70
Self-esteem
29.28
26.85
5.72
123
5.29
433
entire group was 29.45 (SD = 5.70), with the lowest score being 15 and the highest being
40 (note: the lowest possible score for the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale is 10). Internalizing behaviors scores ranged from 0 to 48, with the average score being 20.37
(SD = 11.20).
Bivariate Results
Bivariate analyses revealed that attempters reported statistically higher levels of conflict
with their parents (M = 6.59, SD = 4.84) than non-attempters (M = 3.72, SD = 3.86), as
well as higher levels of internalizing behaviors (M = 25.98, SD = 10.70) than non-attempters (M = 14.95, SD = 8.547). Latina non-attempters showed significantly higher
levels of self-esteem (M = 31.94; SD = 4.95) than attempters (M = 26.85; SD = 5.29).
There were, however, no reported statistically significant differences in parent education
level, adolescent age, or familism between the two groups. Bivariate results comparing
attempters and non-attempters are shown in Table 1.
Correlations between variables used in this study are found in Table 2. A number of
variables were related to each other, but none so much that would cause concern for
multicolinearity. Kline [64] states that multicolinearity should be addressed when variables
report r coefficients greater than 0.85, and the highest in this sample was -0.68. Selfesteem was significantly correlated to suicide attempts (r = -0.45, p \ 0.001), familism
(r = 0.25, p \ 0.001), parent-adolescent conflict (r = -0.43, p \ 0.001), and internalizing behaviors (r = -0.69, p \ 0.001). Internalizing behaviors showed a significant correlation to suicide attempts (r = 0.50, p \ 0.001) and parent-adolescent conflict (r = 0.41,
p \ 0.001). In addition to the significant correlations already described to internalizing
behaviors and self-esteem, parent-adolescent conflict was significantly related to suicide
attempts (r = 0.34, p \ 0.001) and familism (r = -0.38, p \ 0.001).
Path Analysis Results
The path model (Fig. 1), which included covariates (adolescent age, parent education level,
and Hispanic ethnic/cultural group), and internalizing behaviors and self-esteem mediating
the relationship between the risk factor of parent-adolescent conflict and cultural protective
factor familism was fitted using Mplus Version 5.2, using the weighted least squared
estimator, which calculates the significance of direct and specified indirect paths [61].
Model results will be reported using the standardized coefficients (the standard deviation change in the dependent variable for every one unit change in the standard deviation of
Table 2 Correlations between study variables
1
1. Age at interview
2. Parent education
-0.06
3. Familism
-0.07
-0.11
4. Parent-adolescent conflict
0.08
0.09
5. Self-esteem
0.08
0.06
-0.38***
6. Internalizing behaviors
-0.12
-0.08
-0.07
0.41***
-0.69***
7. Suicide attempter
-0.08
-0.13
-0.10
0.34***
-0.45***
0.25***
-0.43***
0.50***
123
434
the independent variable), but both standardized and unstandardized coefficients can be
found in Fig. 2,with the unstandardized coefficients shown in parentheses. The path model
demonstrated good model fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.02). The results from
the path model showed that familism had a negative relationship with parent-adolescent
conflict (b = -1.43, p \ 0.001) and a positive relationship with internalizing behaviors
(b = 0.12, p \ 0.05), and the relationship between familism and self-esteem was no longer
significant in the path model. Parent-adolescent conflict was negatively related to selfesteem (b = -0.57, p \ 0.001) and positively related to internalizing behaviors (b = 1.25,
p \ 0.001). Both self-esteem (b = -0.04, p \ 0.05) and internalizing behaviors
(b = 0.04, p \ 0.001) showed significant relationships with suicide attempts in the
hypothesized directions. Neither parent education level, nor adolescent age showed significant relationships to any of the variables in the path model, and no Hispanic subgroup
had a significant relationship to any of the variables in the model after adjusting for
pairwise comparisons.
Using Sobels test, we found that the several indirect paths in our model were also
significant (Table 3). Both paths from parent-adolescent conflict through adolescent selfesteem (z = 6.87, p \ 0.001) and internalizing behaviors (z = 6.92, p \ 0.001) to suicide
attempts were significant. The indirect path from familism through internalizing behaviors
to suicide attempts was also significant (z = 10.44, p \ 0.001). In addition, the paths from
familism to internalizing behaviors (z = -4.45, p \ 0.001) and self-esteem, (z = 4.84,
p \ 0.001) both via parent-adolescent conflict, were significant.
Fig. 2 Full model results for path analysis. Note: Standardized coefficients are listed on the model paths,
followed by unstandardized coefficients in parentheses. Model Fit Indices: CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99,
RMSEA = 0.02. Results for covariates were not significant and are not shown. * p \ 0.05; ** p \ 0.01;
*** p \ 0.001
123
435
Sa
Sb
ab
b2 s2a a2 s2b
Familism ? internalizing
behaviors ? suicide attempt
1.13 0.56
0.04
0.00
10.44***
Familism ? self-esteem
? suicide attempt
0.02
-1.41
1.20 0.17
0.03 0.01
0.03 0.01
0.04
0.01
6.92***
0.02
0.00
6.87***
0.82
0.17
4.84***
Familism ? P-A
conflict ? internalizing
behaviors
-1.43 0.27
0.39
-4.45***
Discussion
From self-report data provided by a group of adolescent Latinas living with their families
in a large northeastern metropolitan area, we undertook analyses that focused on familism,
parent-adolescent conflict, self-esteem, internalizing behaviors, and suicide attempts.
Controlling for adolescent age, Latino ethnicity, and parent education level, we sought
answers to several hypotheses that support an ecological model when seeking to understand the phenomenon of suicide attempts in adolescent Latinas.
Consistent with our expectations, familism was a protective factor against parent-adolescent conflict, and parent-adolescent conflict was in-turn related to higher levels of
internalizing behaviors and lower self-esteem. Both internalizing behaviors and selfesteem were related to suicide attempts, with higher levels of the former predicting
attempts, and higher levels of the latter protecting against them. Although we had
hypothesized that familism would be a cultural protective factor against internalizing
behaviors, our results suggested a relationship in the opposite direction, since familism
predicted higher levels of internalizing behaviors in the adolescent girls. Various indirect
paths to adolescent suicide attempts were also significant in our model, including the two
paths from parent-adolescent conflict to suicide attempts, mediated by internalizing
behaviors and self-esteem, and the path from familism to attempts through internalizing
behaviors. The mediation paths from familism to both internalizing behaviors and selfesteem through parent-adolescent conflict were both significant as well.
Familism in this study was related to both individual level variables and the familial
level variable of parent-adolescent conflict. The complexity of the concept and measurement of familism was evident in this study in that as the girls familistic attitudes rose, they
evinced lower levels of conflict but higher levels of internalizing behaviors. Girls with a
suicidal history did not differ in their endorsement of familism from girls without such a
history.
Familisms relationship to lower conflict between the parent and adolescent can be
interpreted in several ways. In using an attitudinal measure of familism that measures
deference to elders among other domains, we may have an indication that girls with higher
familism may refrain from engaging in conflict with parents as it is deemed disrespectful to
123
436
them [19]. Girls with higher levels of familism may also be more in-tune with their
parents values but it is possible that as the disparity grows between parents and
daughters familistic attitudes with the girls increasing acculturation and maturation,
conflict may also increase [3].
Traditional Hispanic family values may have different meanings across genders [19].
For example, respecting elders for a Latina adolescent could mean internalizing problems
in order to maintain harmonious family relationships [5]. As familism is a multi-faceted
concept, it may be that certain components are more related to higher levels of internalizing behaviors, and other components account more for reduced levels of parent-adolescent conflict. This merits more research attention that could explore the interactions of
the separate dimensions of the familism construct.
Parent-adolescent conflict at the familial level emerged as the variable most strongly
associated with other variables. This is not surprising and illuminates the importance of the
interpersonal changes that dawn in early adolescence. That Latinas who perceived more
conflict with their parents also reported higher levels of internalizing behaviors and lower
levels of self-esteem is consistent with findings of higher internalizing behaviors in the
presence of parent-adolescent conflict among Latino and non-Latino youth [35, 50, 65, 66].
There is room to speculate that adolescent perception of high conflict with parents may have
particular salience in the context of Latino family dynamics and child socialization. With
considerable emphasis given to the individuals obligation to the family through familism
and deference to parents that is transmitted through child-rearing practices, Latino adolescents may experience conflict differently than youth from mainstream American culture who
are encouraged to assert themselves and establish their independence. As conflict with their
parents escalates, adolescent Latinas may feel especially guilty for not conforming to the
deferential posture expected of them and to traditional gender norms that urge them to
sacrifice autonomy for their parents and family. Like other females in this age group, Latinas
may turn their stress inward, raising the possibilities of depression and other internalizing
disorders [67, 68]. In sum, familism presents a very interesting dynamic in the lives of the
Latinas in our study: it can have a double-edged effect. On one side, familism has protective
effects on Latino adolescents that enhance self-esteem. On the other side, familism can blunt
the conflict between adolescents and parents. Restricting a young womans rights to deviate
from parents values, attitudes, beliefs and practices may cause a turning inward that can lead
to lowered self-esteem, more internalization of emotions, depression, and suicidality.
Although our results did not show a direct relationship from parent-adolescent conflict
to suicide attempts, the indirect paths from parent-adolescent conflicts mediated by
internalizing behaviors and self-esteem were significant, which gives support to the suggestion made by Gould et al. [42], that researchers should take caution in interpreting direct
effects from parent-adolescent conflict to suicide because of the likely presence of these
indirect paths. Self-esteem and internalizing behaviors were also correlated with each
other, a finding consistent with past research that shows that this relationship can arguably
run in both directions [69, 70].
Limitations
There are some limitations of this study. One limitation is the purposive sampling strategy
we used in which we sought girls from mental health centers who had attempted suicide
and the convenience sample of our comparison group. We also did not account for any
group differences that may be present in the types of clients and/or patients served at the
community facilities. Not controlling for lethality introduced variability in our sample that
123
437
limits our conclusions. Because the girls in our study do not represent participants from
other parts of the country, our findings can only be interpreted as applicable to girls in the
metropolitan area we surveyed; they do not necessarily generalize to other Latina girls.
Although, a longitudinal study also examining familism and parent-adolescent conflict,
internalizing behaviors, and self-esteem showed the temporal order we posit to be significant [35], our data were collected at one time point, not prospectively, and so no lines of
causation can be drawn from the relationships examined. Another limitation is that we used
the girls reports of conflict with parents only; we did not include parents perceptions of
conflict or familism in this report.
Implications for Practice
In spite of these limitations, this study contributes to knowledge about the characteristics of
Latina adolescents who attempt suicide and to the general body of research on adolescent
suicide attempts. With the limited literature on the correlates and explanations for the high
rates of suicidal behavior in adolescent Latinas, and even fewer studies with a clear
theoretical frame [53], our study and our findings are a step in closing gaps on this topic.
Furthermore, many of our findings support the results reported by other researchers who
have studied both non-Latino and Latino youth in rural and urban settings in different parts
of the United States [44].
The fact that the girls themselves report that familistic attitudes provide positive outcomes, like heightened self-worth and lower conflict with their parents, should be viewed
as a target of interventions for these girls and families. Communication between Latino
parents and daughters [3] can reduce conflict and the risk of suicidal actions by improving
the emotional connection and sense of support and affection that comes from talking with
parents in open, trusting, and reliable interactions. Besides reinforcing cultural values and
ethnic identity that promotes prosocial and adaptive behaviors [71, 72], communication is
the pathway toward enhancing shared familistic values in families.
For the clinical realm, we can glean some insights that can help program developers and
practitioners who work with this vulnerable population. Suicide prevention and intervention programs for Latina adolescents must involve the parents and siblings, and possibly
extended family. Reports by Rossello and Bernal [73] indicate that cultural adaptations for
Puerto Rican youth include the incorporation of parents as part of the therapy that is
provided. Results of our study suggest not only that Latina adolescents can benefit from
parent-involved suicide prevention and intervention programs, but that services that target
reducing conflict in the parentchild dyad can also help build or retain adolescent-self
esteem and reduce risks for internalizing behaviors. Program developers and practitioners
should take carefully into consideration the values of familism when working with Hispanic populations. Familism can be an enormous support in the treatment of suicidal girls
but it also needs to be recognized as restrictive on girls through its emphasis on selfsacrifice and obligations to parents and siblings. These findings support the development of
suicide prevention programs that are both culturally competent and focused on the parentdaughter relationship in adolescence.
Summary
This study analyzed the relationships between cultural, familial, and individual variables in
a sample of adolescent 115 Latina suicide attempters and 111 non-attempters in New York
123
438
City. Our results point to the importance of familism in suicide attempts in our sample,
through its relationship to parent-adolescent conflict, self-esteem, and internalizing behaviors. While familism acted as a protective factor against parent-adolescent conflict, it was
also related to higher levels of internalizing behaviors. Parent-adolescent conflict also
showed a strong positive relationship to internalizing behaviors and a negative relationship
with self-esteem; however, its effects on suicide attempts were completely mediated by
internalizing behaviors and self-esteem. These findings emphasize the importance of
involving families in suicide interventions and prevention programs that target Latina
adolescents, as improving the relationship between adolescents and their parents reduces the
likelihood for suicide attempts by lowering levels of internalizing behaviors and building
self-esteem. As the phenomenon of high suicide attempts among adolescent Latinas is still
not understood, future research should work to further disentangle and the confluence of
cultural, familial, and individual factors that could be predicting these attempts.
Acknowledgments Support for this paper was provided by grant R01 MH070689 from the National Institute
of Mental Health to Luis H. Zayas. Additional support was provided by the Center for Latino Family Research.
We extend our gratitude to the adolescent girls and their families who participated in this study.
References
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008) Youth online: comprehensive results. Available at:
http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/yrbss/
2. Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration (2003) Summary of findings from the 2000
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville
3. Zayas L, Pilat A (2008) Suicidal behavior in Latinas: explanatory cultural factors and implications for
intervention. Suicide Life Threat 38(3):334342
4. Hawton K, Harriss L, Zahl D (2006) Deaths from all causes in a long-term follow-up study of 11583
deliberate self-harm patients. Psychol Med 36(3):397405
5. Zayas L, Lester R, Cabassa L, Fortuna L (2005) Why do so many Latina teens attempt suicide? A
conceptual model for research. Am J Orthopsychiatry 75(2):275287
6. Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
7. Bronfenbrenner U (1986) Ecology of the family as a context for human development: research perspectives. Dev Psychol 22(6):723742
8. Cooley C (2001) The relationship between familism and child maltreatment in Latino and Anglo
families. Child Maltreat 6(2):130142
9. Smokowski PR, Rose R, Bacallao ML (2008) Acculturation and Latino family processes: how cultural
involvement, biculturalism, and acculturation gaps influence family dynamics. Fam Rel 57(3):295308
10. Rodriguez JM, Kosloski K (1998) The impact of acculturation on attitudinal familism in a community
of Puerto Rican Americans. Hisp J Beh Sci 20(3):375390
11. Cauce AM, Domenech-Rodriguez M (2002) Latino families: myths and realities. In: Contreras JM,
Kerns KA, Neal-Barnett AM (eds) Latino children and families in the United States. Greenwood,
Westport, pp 326
12. Vega WA, Kolody B, Valle R, Weir J (1991) Social networks, social support, and their relationship to
depression among immigrant Mexican women. Hum Organ 50(2):154162
13. Gil AG, Wagner EF (2002) Acculturation, familism, and alcohol use among Latino adolescent males:
longitudinal relations. J Commun Psychol 28:443458
14. Smokowski PR, Bacallao ML (2006) Acculturation and aggression in Latino adolescents: a structural
model focusing on cultural risk factors and assets. J Abnorm Child Psychol 34:657671
15. Rodriguez N, Ramirez M, Korman M (1999) The transmission of values across generations of Mexican,
Mexican American and European American families: implications for mental health. In: Sheets RH,
Hollins ER (eds) Racial/ethnic identity and human development. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 728
16. Cuellar I, Arnold B, Gonzalez G (1995) Cognitive referents of acculturation: assessment of cultural
constructs in Mexican Americans. J Commun Psychol 23(4):339356
17. Ramirez JR, Crano WD, Quist R, Burgoon M, Alvaro EM, Grandpre J (2004) Acculturation, familism,
parental monitoring, and knowledge as predictors of marijuana and inhalant use in adolescents. Psychol
Addict Behav 18(1):311
123
439
18. Sabogal F, Marn G, Otero-Sabogal R, Marn BV, Perez-Stable EJ (1987) Hispanic familism and
acculturation: what changes and what doesnt? Hisp J Behav Sci 9(4):397412
19. Lugo Steidel A, Contreras J (2003) A new familism scale for use with Latino populations. Hisp J Behav
Sci 25(3):312330
20. Valenzuela A, Dornbusch SM (1994) Familism and social capital in the academic achievement of
Mexican origin and Anglo adolescents. Soc Sci Q 75(1):1836
21. Rodriguez RA, Henderson CE, Rowe CL, Burnett KF, Dakof GA, Liddle HA (2007) Acculturation and
drug use among dually diagnosed Hispanic adolescents. J Ethn Subst Abuse 6(2):97113
22. Steinberg L (2001) We know some things: parent-adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect.
J Res Adolesc 11(1):119
23. Smetana JG (1989) Adolescents and parents reasoning about actual family conflict. Child Dev
60:10521067
24. Feldman SS, Rosenthal DA (1990) The acculturation of autonomy expectations in Chinese high
schoolers residing in two western nations. Int J Psychol 25(2):259281
25. Bulcroft RA, Carmody DC, Bulcroft KA (1998) Family structure and patterns of independence giving to
adolescents: variations by age, race, and gender of child. J Fam Issues 19(4):404435
26. Fuligni AJ, Tseng V, Lam M (1999) Attitudes toward family obligations among American adolescents
with Asian, Latin American, and European backgrounds. Child Dev 70(4):10301044
27. Portes A, Rumbaut RG (2001) Legacies: the story of the immigrant second generation. Univ of
California Press, Berkeley
28. Allen JP, Hauser ST, Bell KL, OConnor TG (1994) Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem.
Child Dev 65(1):179194
29. Baca Zinn M (1982) Chicano men and masculinity. J Ethn Stud 10(2):2944
30. Kulis S, Marsiglia FF, Hurdle D (2003) Gender identity, ethnicity, acculturation, and drug use:
exploring differences among adolescents in the Southwest. J Commun Psychol 31(2):167188
31. Cespedes YM, Huey SJ Jr (2008) Depression in Latino adolescents: a cultural discrepancy perspective.
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 14(2):168172
32. Bakan D (1966) The duality of human existence: an essay on psychology and religion. Rand McNally,
Chicago
33. Helgeson VS (1994) Relation of agency and communion to well-being: evidence and potential
explanations. Psychol Bull 116:412428
34. Davies PT, Lindsay LL (2004) Interparental conflict and adolescent adjustment: why does gender
moderate early adolescent vulnerability? J Fam Psychol 18(1):160170
35. Smokowski PR, Bacallao ML (2007) Acculturation, internalizing mental health symptoms, and selfesteem: cultural experiences of Latino adolescents in North Carolina. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev
37(3):273292
36. Portes PR, Zady MF (2002) Self-esteem in the adaptation of Spanish-speaking adolescents: the role of
immigration, family conflict and depression. Hisp J Beh Sci 24(3):296318
37. Breton JJ, Tousignant M, Bergeron L, Berthiaume C (2002) Informant-specific correlates of suicidal
behavior in a community survey of 12-to 14-year-olds. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41(6):
723730
38. Randell B, Wang W, Herting J, Eggert L (2006) Family factors predicting categories of suicide risk.
J Child Fam Stud 15(3):255270
39. Johnson JG, Cohen P, Gould MS, Kasen S, Brown J, Brook JS (2002) Childhood adversities, interpersonal difficulties, and risk for suicide attempts during late adolescence and early adulthood. Arch
Gen Psychiatry 59(8):741749
40. Allison S, Pearce C, Martin G, Miller K, Long R (1995) Parental influence, pessimism and adolescent
suicidality. Arch Suicide Res 1(4):229242
41. Toumbourou JW, Gregg ME (2002) Impact of an empowerment-based parent education program on the
reduction of youth suicide risk factors. J Adol Health 31(3):277285
42. Gould MS, Greenberg T, Velting DM, Shaffer D (2003) Youth suicide risk and preventive interventions: a review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42(4):386405
43. Kovacs M, Goldston D, Gatsonis C (1993) Suicidal behaviors and childhood-onset depressive disorders:
a longitudinal investigation: longitudinal studies of depressive disorders in children. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry 32(1):820
44. Spirito A, Francis G, Overholser J, Frank N (1996) Coping, depression, and adolescent suicide attempts.
J Clin Child Adol Psychol 25(2):147155
45. Guiao IZ, Esparza D (1995) Suicidality correlates in Mexican American teens. Issues Ment Health Nurs
16(5):461479
123
440
46. Swanson JW, Linskey AO, Quintero-Salinas R, Pumariega AJ, Holzer C (1992) Depressive symptoms,
drug use and suicidal ideation among youth in the Rio Grande valley: a bi-national school survey. J Am
Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 31(4):669678
47. Dukes RL, Lorch B (1989) The effects of school, family, self-concept, and deviant behaviour on
adolescent suicide ideation. J Adolesc 12(3):239251
48. Campbell NB, Milling L, Laughlin A, Bush E (1993) The psychosocial climate of families with suicidal
pre-adolescent children. Am J Orthopsychiatry 63:142145
49. Razin AM, ODowd MA, Nathan A, Rodriguez I, Goldfield A, Martin C et al (1991) Suicidal behavior
among inner-city Hispanic adolescent females. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 13(1):4558
50. Shagle SC, Barber BK (1993) Effects of family, marital, and parent-child conflict on adolescent selfderogation and suicidal ideation. J Marriage Fam 55(4):964974
51. Roberts RE, Roberts CR, Xing Y (2007) Are Mexican American adolescents at greater risk of suicidal
behaviors? Suicide Life Threat 37(1):1021
52. Vega WA, Gil AG, Zimmerman RS, Warheit GJ (1993) Risk factors for suicidal behavior among
Hispanic, AfricanAmerican, and non-Hispanic white boys in early adolescence. Ethn Dis 3(3):229241
53. Duarte-Velez Y, Bernal G (2007) Suicide behavior among Latino and Latina adolescents: conceptual
and methodological issues. Death Stud 31(5):425455
54. Carlson GA, Asarnow JR, Orbach I (1987) Developmental aspects of suicidal behavior in children: I.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 26(2):186192
55. Ng B (1996) Characteristics of 61 Mexican American adolescents who attempted suicide. Hisp J Beh
Sci 18(1):312
56. Sabo D, Miller KE, Melnick MJ, Farrell MP, Barnes GM (2005) High school athletic participation and
adolescent suicide: a nationwide US study. Int Rev Sociol Sport 40(1):15
57. Ocarroll PW, Berman AL, Maris RW, Moscicki EK, Tanney BL, Silverman MM (1996) Beyond the
tower of Babel: a nomenclature for suicidology. Suicide Life Threat 26(3):237252
58. Rosenberg M (1979) Conceiving the self. Basic Books, New York
59. Achenbach TM (1991) Manual for the child behavior Checklist/418 and 1991 profile. Univ of Vermont, Dept Psychol, Burlington
60. Robin AL, Foster SL (1989) Negotiating parent-adolescent conflict: a behavioral-family systems
approach. Guilford Press, New York
61. Muthen LK, Muthen BO (2006) Version 5 Mplus users guide. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles
62. Collins LM, Schafer JL, Kam CM (2001) A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern
missing data procedures: New approaches to missing data. Psychol Methods 6(4):330351
63. Royston P (2004) Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J 4:227241
64. Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New York
65. Gunlicks-Stoessel ML, Powers SI (2008) Adolescents emotional experiences of mother-adolescent
conflict predict internalizing and externalizing symptoms. J Res Adolesc 18(4):621642
66. Parker JS, Benson MJ (2004) Parent-adolescent relations and adolescent functioning: Self-esteem,
substance abuse, and delinquency. Adolescence 39(155):519531
67. Li CE, DiGiuseppe R, Froh J (2006) The roles of sex, gender, and coping in adolescent depression.
Adolescence 41(163):409415
68. Elder JP, Broyles SL, Brennan JJ, de Nuncio MLZ, Nader PR (2005) Acculturation, parentchild
acculturation differential, and chronic disease risk factors in a Mexican-American population. J Immigr
Health 7(1):19
69. McDonald EJ, McCabe K, Yeh M, Lau A, Garland A, Hough RL (2005) Cultural affiliation and selfesteem as predictors of internalizing symptoms among Mexican American adolescents. J Clin Child
Adolesc Psychol 34(1):163171
70. Lee A, Hankin BL (2009) Insecure attachment, dysfunctional attitudes, and low self-esteem predicting
prospective symptoms of depression and anxiety during adolescence. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol
38(2):219231
71. Umana-Taylor AJ, Updegraff KA (2007) Latino adolescents mental health: exploring the interrelations
among discrimination, ethnic identity, cultural orientation, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms.
J Adolesc 30(4):549567
72. Phinney JS, Cantu CL, Kurtz DA (1997) Ethnic and American identity as predictors of self-esteem
among African American, Latino, and white adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 26:165185
73. Rossello J, Bernal G (1999) The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal treatments for
depression in Puerto Rican adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol 67:734745
123