The real missing contexts of Ferguson and other

protests
By: Luigi DeFrancesco

The Ferguson incident has taught us that it had nothing to do about race. The
grand jury determined by the facts presented that it was a questions of survival
by one individual that wore the uniform of a police officer. The facts also showed
that the individual who paid the ultimate price was an African American. If the
individuals race were reversed would the media and public figures such as the
President of the United States of America (USA) and Al Sharpton been actively
involved? The Washington Times reported on November 27, 2014 the following:
Gilbert Collar, a white, unarmed 18-year-old under the influence of drugs was
shot and killed Oct. 6, 2012, by Officer Trevis Austin, who is black, in Mobile,
Alabama. Despite public pressure for an indictment, a Mobile County grand jury
refused to bring charges against Officer Austin, concluding that the officer acted
in self-defense. Does anybody ever heard of Gilbert Collar? What is the real
contexts of the Ferguson incident? How about a left wing conspiracy. Possible?
Lets see by going over the real contexts. Context no. 1: the end justifies the
means.
The best individual to explain this context is Karl Marx the socialist philosopher
who said: It is not history which uses men as a means of achieving - as if it were
an individual person - its own ends. History is nothing but the activity of men in
pursuit of their ends.
What ends the demonstrators are pursuing all over the major cities in the USA?
Do they really care about a particular segment of the USA population? I doubt it
since it would be well recognized if their intent was to build instead of destroying
neighborhoods. The protesters showed up from outside Ferguson with
manufactured signs and the composition of the youth who caused the major
problems were black and white youths. What did these youths have in common?
They both used the clenched fist to identify themselves. Is the general public
aware of the meaning of a clenched fist? The clenched fist is the international
salute of the communists and socialists. I have personally witness many of these
kind of demonstrations when I lived in Italy from 1960 to 1964. The tactics are
the same and at times so disruptive to cause the toppling of governments. Such
was the case when in March 1960 Christian Democrat Fernando Tramboni was
named prime minister of Italy with the duties to form a new government. He was

able to form a government with the help of what, at that time, was considered a
far right minor political party. This event was not acceptable to the parties of the
left led by socialists and communists in fact they unleashed the worst imaginable
rioting throughout the Italian peninsula. The upheaval caused such strain on the
Italian economy that Tramboni was forced to resign. Tramboni was sworn in on
March 25, 1960 and his government was dissolved on July 19, 1960. This ensured
years of governing by a coalition which included the socialists. Is it possible that
something similar could happened in the USA? Well it already did, in fact the
same tactics-under the guise of peace movement- were used effectively to force
President Lyndon B. Johnson not to run for a second term. You must keep in
mind that the agitators participating at these demonstrations came from the
same group that comprised the Occupy Wall Street Movement of recent
memory. Context no 2: democracy is the path to socialism. In fact Karl Marx also
stated: Democracy is the road to socialism. Marx is correct that the Democracy
provides the tool to reach socialism. Since there is a two party system the first
goal would be to hold leadership positions in a major political party with a name
that the common people would relate to then propose and implement a system
that would guarantee votes in your favor and finally take control of the party.
Socialists have joined the Democratic Party under the guise of so called
Progressives or liberals for years. The creation of President Johnson Great
Society built a solid voting base for the new liberal Democratic Party. When
Barrack Hussein Obama was elected the transformation was completed as
candidate Obama promised to completely transform America. Context no. 3:
creating dependency is not enough and in Karl Marx own words Anyone who
knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without
feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position
of the fair sex, the ugly ones included. Marx stated the above when the African
population in Europe was at the very best minimal with no impact on any political
outcome. Had he lived today in the USA he would have, most likely, included
African American upheaval in his quote. Is there any party that has been
propagating the idea of injustices towards women and blacks in the USA today?
Did someone start propagating white racism or white privilege to justify the
protests in Ferguson and in other cities? To those with an open mind should be
obvious of the ends of the progressives, liberals or socialists are trying to achieve
and it seems that the facts indicate that they will use any means to do so. I stated
to a local leader of the Democratic Party last year that if they would clean up their
party of all socialists they would never lose an election. The following is the

answer I received: what is wrong with socialism?. Is there a conspiracy by the

left to take over America? Perhaps?