Plaintiff,
vs.
ROBERT G. WRIGHT D/B/A
LITTLE BOBBY CREATIONS
Defendant.
COMPLAINT
advertising, and unfair competition arising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051, et seq. and
Wisconsin statutory and common law. Harley-Davidson seeks equitable and monetary relief
from Robert Wright d/b/a Little Bobby Creations (Defendant) willful violations of HarleyDavidsons trademark rights in its famous and federally registered marks HARLEYDAVIDSON, H-D, and the Bar & Shield Logo (the Harley-Davidson Marks).
2.
and its objections to Defendants actions that are the subject of this Complaint, Defendant has
continued to promote and sell lampshades bearing the famous Harley-Davidson Marks (the
Infringing Products). Defendants Infringing Products are made from genuine, licensed
1
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 28 Document 1
Harley-Davidson bedding and other products that have been reconstructed and materially
altered into completely different products having different functions and purposes, i.e.,
lampshades. The public is likely to believe that the Infringing Products come from or are
authorized, approved, and/or licensed by Harley-Davidson. Defendants unauthorized Infringing
Products also circumvent Harley-Davidsons ability to control the quality of products branded
with the Harley-Davidson Marks.
3.
Defendants unlawful activities are also likely to dilute and tarnish the famous
Harley-Davidson Marks, constitute false advertising and unfair competition, and have caused
and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Harley-Davidson, the Harley-Davidson Marks,
and the consuming public.
THE PARTIES
4.
principal place of business at 3700 West Juneau Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53208, and is
the owner of the trademark rights asserted in this action, i.e., the Harley-Davidson Marks.
5.
Point, Indiana 46307 and doing business as Little Bobby Creations and littlebobbycreations.com.
Defendant advertises, promotes, sells, and distributes numerous lampshades bearing the HarleyDavidson Marks. Defendant is not an authorized Harley-Davidson dealer or a licensee of any of
the Harley-Davidson Marks.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
6.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 15
U.S.C. 1121, and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) and (b). Because the parties are citizens of
different states and the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of seventy-five thousand
2
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 2 of 28 Document 1
dollars ($75,000.00), exclusive of interest and costs, this Court also has jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. 1332. Jurisdiction over the state law claims is also appropriate under 28 U.S.C.
1367(a) and principles of pendent jurisdiction because those claims are substantially related to
the federal claims.
7.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant and venue is proper in the
Since at least as early as 1903, Harley-Davidson has used and promoted the
3
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 3 of 28 Document 1
11.
Since at least as early as 1912, Harley-Davidson has used the H-D trademark and
variations thereof in connection with its motorcycles and motorcycle parts and accessories (the
H-D Mark). Harley-Davidson and its dealers and licensees, motorcycle enthusiasts, the media,
and the general public have for many decades regarded the H-D Mark as being synonymous and
interchangeable with the HARLEY-DAVIDSON mark, and motorcycle enthusiasts, the media,
and the general public have used H-D and HARLEY-DAVIDSON interchangeably to refer to
Harley-Davidson and its products for decades.
12.
Since at least as early as 1910, Harley-Davidson has used its Bar & Shield logo.
Over the years, Harley-Davidson has used its Bar & Shield logo and variations thereof, including
but not limited to, those shown below (collectively, the Bar & Shield Logo), for motorcycles
and motorcycle products and services.
4
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 4 of 28 Document 1
13.
Over the years, Harley-Davidson has expanded its business to a wide range of
other products and services, including but not limited to apparel, bedding, signs, collectibles,
home furnishings, housewares, and more. The Harley-Davidson Marks have been used on a
wide variety of products for decades.
14.
The Harley-Davidson Marks are famous and premium brands and Harley-
Davidson has a reputation for providing a wide variety of high-quality products and merchandise
under those brands itself and through numerous licensees. Given its substantial commercial
success over the years and its status for many years as a famous, iconic, and cult brand, there has
long been a strong demand from motorcycle enthusiasts as well as the general public for
merchandise bearing the Harley-Davidson Marks, including home furnishings, so they can show
their affinity for Harley-Davidson and its products and brands. To satisfy this demand and to
further build awareness of the Harley-Davidson Marks, Harley-Davidson has for decades
licensed the Harley-Davidson Marks (and other of its trademarks) to numerous licensees for use
on a wide range of products including home furnishings, bedding, and apparel, just to name a few.
15.
merchandise sold under the Harley-Davidson Marks, Harley-Davidson requires its licensees to
comply with its extensive and stringent quality-control standards. These quality standards include,
among other things: (1) the licensee must first submit product concepts and artwork for HarleyDavidsons prior written approval, (2) once the concept and artwork is approved, the licensee must
then submit a pre-production product sample for Harley-Davidsons prior written approval, and (3)
once the pre-production product sample is approved, the licensee must then submit a production
sample of the product (i.e., the product that will be sold in the public) for Harley-Davidsons prior
written approval. A licensee cannot promote or advertise any licensed products without
5
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 5 of 28 Document 1
completing all of these steps. As part of this quality-control review process, Harley-Davidson
carefully reviews the licensed products in numerous respects, including the materials used in
making the licensed products, the quality of the craftsmanship and construction of the products, the
design, style, and appearance of the product, and the overall quality of the products.
16.
merchandise over the years. The vast majority, if not all, of Harley-Davidsons licensed products
and/or associated labeling and packaging bear one or more of the Harley-Davidson Marks.
Harley-Davidsons royalty revenues from licensing exceeded $400 million during 2005-2013
alone, which translates into billions of dollars of sales at retail.
17.
accessories, and licensed merchandise, including home furnishings, under the Harley-Davidson
Marks through a network of more than 695 authorized dealers located throughout the country,
and numerous other retail outlets. These other retail outlets consist of Alternative Retail Outlets
(AROs) and Seasonal Retail Outlets (SROs).
18.
popular vacation destinations and focus on selling Harley-Davidsons general merchandise as well
as licensed products. SROs are located in similar high-traffic areas, but operate on a seasonal basis
out of temporary locations such as vendor kiosks. AROs and SROs are not authorized to sell new
motorcycles. This right is reserved for authorized Harley-Davidson dealers.
19.
sold through the HARLEY-DAVIDSON.COM website, authorized dealers websites, and/or the
websites of Harley-Davidsons licensees.
6
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 6 of 28 Document 1
20.
Harley-Davidson and its dealers and licensees have sold many billions of dollars
of products and services under the Harley-Davidson Marks over the years, and have expended
many millions of dollars advertising and promoting those marks through virtually every media.
For example, Harley-Davidson has promoted its products and marks through dealer promotions,
customer events, direct mailings, national television, print, and radio advertisements, and the
Internet.
21.
Harley-Davidson, its products and services, and its Harley-Davidson Marks have
received significant unsolicited media coverage for many years, including, for example, in
national publications such as Business Week, The Chicago Tribune, The New York Times, The
Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and USA Today, as well as in numerous national
television programs and online publications and websites, such as MSNBC, CNN Money,
CNN.COM, and Yahoo Finance.
22.
success, and popularity, the HARLEY-DAVIDSON brand has been ranked annually for the past
decade among the top 100 most valuable brands in the world by Interbrand, a leading
independent branding firm. In 2014, Interbrand estimated the value of the HARLEYDAVIDSON brand at US $4.77 billion.
23.
Davidson Marks, and the widespread advertising, publicity, promotion, and substantial sales of
products and services under those marks, the Harley-Davidson Marks have been well known and
famous to both the general public and the motorcycling public for many years.
24.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Board)
7
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 7 of 28 Document 1
expressly held that the HARLEY-DAVIDSON, HARLEY, and Bar & Shield Logo marks were
famous for motorcycles, apparel, and accessories. 2009 WL 1227921, at *5 (TTAB 2009).
25.
The Boards reviewing court, the Federal Circuit, has also recognized HARLEY-
DAVIDSON as a well-known and famous mark. See Ronda Ag v. Harley-Davidson, Inc., 1997
U.S. App. LEXIS 3597, *3-4 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 27, 1997).
26.
and/or in connection with the advertising and sales of bedding and window covering products.
Over the years, these goods have included sheets, pillow cases, pillow shams, pillows, bed skirts,
comforters, blankets, duvets, throws, pillows, and linens, as well as window coverings such as
drapes, and window valances. Representative examples of these products are shown below.
Harley-Davidson Tattoo
Full Sheet Set
Harley-Davidson Fireball
Decorative Pillow
Harley-Davidson Flame
Rider Fireball Pillow Shams
Harley-Davidson
Tattoo Valance
Harley-Davidson
Tattoo Full Bed skirt
8
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 8 of 28 Document 1
27.
H-D has sold home furnishings under the Harley-Davidson Marks since as early as
the 1980s and table lamps since as early as 1986. Over the years, Harley-Davidson has used the
Harley-Davidson Marks on and/or in connection with table lamps, desk lamps, billiard lamps,
neon signs, decorative wall plaques and mirrors, posters, glassware, barware, barstools,
jukeboxes, tables, chairs, benches, wall clocks, beverage carts, mini refrigerators, gas grills,
vaults and safes, and other goods. Representative examples of some of these products are shown
below.
Harley-Davidson Art
Glass Long B&S 14"
Tiffany Style Hand
Painted Table Lamp
Harley-Davidson Neon
Wall & Table Orange
Lamp
Harley-Davidson
Chrome Bar & Shield
Black Clip Lamp
9
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 9 of 28 Document 1
Harley-Davidson
Animated Novelty Lamp
Harley-Davidson
Art Glass Motorcycle
Table Lamp
Harley-Davidson
Rotating Pub Light
Harley-Davidson Art
Glass Table Lamp
Harley-Davidson
Midnight Chrome Billiard Lamp
10
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 10 of 28 Document 1
DAVIDSON mark, Harley-Davidson owns, among others, the following federal registrations for
that mark:
Mark
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
0508160
04-05-1949
Electric lamps and spare parts for same, electric signs, among other
goods.
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
3690031
09-29-2009
Non-luminous, non-mechanical tin signs, non-luminous, nonmechanical metal signs, tool boxes of metal, tool chests of metal,
metal keys for locks, key rings of metal, knife handles of metal, metal
pet tags, metal luggage tags and metal personal identification tabs
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
0508160
04-05-1949
Electric lamps and spare parts for same, spark plugs, electric signs
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
1708418
08-18-1992
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
1610377
08-21-1990
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
1610396
08-21-1990
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
1450348
08-04-1987
11
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 11 of 28 Document 1
Mark
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
0539805
03-27-1951
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
0526750
06-27-1950
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
1078871
12-06-1977
Vehicles-namely, motorcycles
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
1311457
12-25-1984
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
3490890
08-26-2008
29.
In addition to its longstanding and strong common-law rights in the Bar & Shield
Logo, Harley-Davidson owns, among others, the following federal registrations for that mark:
Mark
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
3640579
06-16-2009
1660539
10-15-1991
12
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 12 of 28 Document 1
Mark
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
3082869
04-18-2006
1725918
10-20-1992
Pool and billiard cues and cases therefor, among other goods.
1263936
01-17-1984
3058720
02-14-2006
3559365
01-13-2009
2344680
04-25-2000
1692178
06-09-1992
Jewelry pins
13
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 13 of 28 Document 1
Mark
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
1224868
11-02-1982
As shown above, Harley-Davidsons rights in its Bar & Shield Logo extend to the marks design,
regardless of the wording contained within the design.
30.
In addition to its longstanding and strong common-law rights in the H-D Mark,
Harley-Davidson owns, among others, the following federal registrations for the H-D Mark:
Mark
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
H-D
1317592
02-05-1985
14
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 14 of 28 Document 1
Mark
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
H-D
1239313
Motorcycles
05-24-1983
31.
facie evidence of Harley-Davidsons ownership and the validity of the Harley-Davidson Marks.
Further, many of these registrations are incontestable, and such registrations constitute
conclusive evidence of Harley-Davidsons exclusive right to use those marks for the products
and services specified in those registrations pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1065 and 1115(b).
32.
registrations for its HARLEY-DAVIDSON, H-D, and Bar & Shield marks:
Mark
Reg. Date
HD
11-18-2009
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
11-18-2009
11-18-2009
15
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 15 of 28 Document 1
Mark
Reg. Date
11-18-2009
unauthorized ways on and in connection with the Infringing Products that falsely suggest and are
likely to create the mistaken impression that Defendants reconstructed and materially altered
products are authorized, approved, and/or licensed by Harley-Davidson when they are not.
34.
Harley-Davidson Marks and materially altered and reconstructed those products to create
completely new and different products having different functions and purposes. Specifically,
Defendant has materially altered and reconstructed genuine Harley-Davidson bedding products and
other genuine Harley-Davidson products and cut and sewed these products to create new products
in the form of lampshades. Representative examples of the Infringing Products sold on
Defendants website www.littlebobbycreations.com are shown below.
16
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 16 of 28 Document 1
35.
17
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 17 of 28 Document 1
HARLEY-DAVIDSONS OBJECTIONS TO
DEFENDANTS WRONGFUL ACTS
36.
advertising, promotion, manufacture, and sale of the Infringing Products, Defendant expressly
refused to cease his unlawful conduct and argued that his activities were not in violation of any
trademark or copyright laws.
37.
Harley-Davidson then turned the matter over to its outside counsel. On July 30,
18
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 18 of 28 Document 1
I have fully reviewed your letter, making clear to H-D that Defendant would not resume sales of
the Infringing Products until and unles he had responded substantively to H-D.
38.
More than a year later, Defendant, without having sent a substantive response to
H-Ds outside counsel and without giving notice to H-Ds outside counsel, removed the
suspension notice from his website and resumed offering the Infringing Products for sale. In
response, Harley-Davidsons outside counsel contacted Defendant on January 7, 2014 and
reiterated its demand that Defendant remove the Infringing Products from his website and
provide a substantive response to Harley-Davidsons outside counsels initial letter. In response,
Defendant sent an email on January 17, 2014 stating that he would again suspend sales of the
Infringing Products. Defendant then put the suspension notice back on his website, and removed
several of the Infringing Products from his website, but still failed to provide the promised
substantive response to Harley-Davidsons outside counsels initial letter. On January 23, 2014,
Harley-Davidsons outside counsel again contacted Defendant and objected to the continued
display of the Infringing Products on Defendants website, and Defendant later removed the
Infringing Products from his website altogether and retained the suspension notice on his website.
39.
havng sent a substantive response to H-Ds outside counsel and without giving notice to H-Ds
outside counsel, had removed the suspension notice from his website, redisplayed and/or relisted
the Infringing Products he originally had for sale, and displayed or listed new additional
Infringing Products for sale on his website.
40.
From time to time, Defendants website has disclaimed an affiliation with Harley-
19
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 19 of 28 Document 1
pay attention to, or understand the disclaimer, and the disclaimer has no effect whatsoever on
post-sale confusion.
41.
news publication providing information about classic cars. In response to one of the
interviewers questions Defendant stated:
The most difficult challenge has been copyright/trademark owners such as Disney,
Marvel Comics, Dr. Seuss Enterprises, WWE and many others who claim our
lampshades violate their copyright/trademark images and logos. As an attorney, I know
the law, and none of our lampshades violate any copyright/trademark laws. To address
these false claims, I drafted a 20-page legal document which explains in detail why our
lampshades do not violate any copyright/trademark laws. When a copyright/trademark
owner files a complaint, I send them a copy of the 20-page document. Each of them has
withdrawn their complaint.
42.
Defendants above statements in his interview are false. Such statements were
The Infringing Products are not subject to the same standards, review, and
Infringing Products and/or Harley-Davidsons products are false, deceptive, and/or misleading.
20
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 20 of 28 Document 1
Defendants actions described above have damaged and injured and, if permitted
to continue, will further damage and injure Harley-Davidson, the Harley-Davidson Marks,
Harley-Davidsons reputation and goodwill associated with those trademarks, Harley-Davidsons
reputation for high-quality products and services, and the public interest in being free from
confusion.
46.
and deception as to the source or origin of Defendants products, and are likely to falsely suggest
a sponsorship, connection, license, affiliation, or association between Defendant and/or his
products with Harley-Davidson.
47.
Defendants actions described above are also likely to dilute the distinctiveness
and value of the famous Harley-Davidson Marks and are likely to tarnish the famous HarleyDavidson Marks.
48.
Defendants actions described above have irreparably harmed, and if not enjoined,
will continue to irreparably harm the general public, which has an inherent interest in being free
from confusion, mistake, and deception.
49.
Defendants actions described above have irreparably harmed and, if not enjoined,
will continue to irreparably harm Harley-Davidson and the famous Harley-Davidson Marks.
50.
51.
Harley-Davidson hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth
21
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 21 of 28 Document 1
52.
and/or reproductions, copies, and colorable imitations thereof in connection with the offering,
sale, distribution, and advertising of goods, which is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or
deception as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of Defendants products and commercial
activities, and thus constitutes infringement of Harley-Davidsons federally registered marks
referred to in paragraphs 28 to 30 above in violation of Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
1114.
53.
The actions of Defendant described above have at all times relevant to this action
been willful.
54.
Harley-Davidson repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in
The actions of Defendant described above have at all times relevant to this action
been willful.
22
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 22 of 28 Document 1
58.
Harley-Davidson repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in
The actions of Defendant described above have at all times relevant to this action
been willful.
62.
Harley-Davidson repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in
and use of the Harley-Davidson Marks for many years. Further, Harley-Davidson has had
massive sales of its goods and services sold under the Harley-Davidson Marks for decades.
23
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 23 of 28 Document 1
65.
The Harley-Davidson Marks have for many years received extensive unsolicited
media attention nationwide. Such extensive and frequent media attention and commercial
success has had a substantial impact on the public and has long created an association in the
minds of consumers between Harley-Davidson and the Harley-Davidson Marks, and the HarleyDavidson Marks are famous and were famous nationwide before Defendant commenced his
unauthorized use of the Harley-Davidson Marks.
66.
Marks became famous, are likely to cause dilution by blurring and dilution by tarnishment of the
distinctive quality of those trademarks in violation of Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15
U.S.C. 1125(c).
67.
The actions of Defendant described above have at all times relevant to this action
been willful.
68.
Harley-Davidson repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in
24
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 24 of 28 Document 1
71.
Upon information and belief, the actions of Defendant described above have at all
Harley-Davidson repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in
The actions of Defendant described above have at all times relevant to this action
been willful.
76.
25
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 25 of 28 Document 1
1.
any other unauthorized material alterations and/or reconstructions of genuine products bearing
the Harley-Davidson Marks or variations thereof.
C.
An Order directing Defendant to file with this Court and serve on Harley-
Davidsons attorneys, thirty (30) days after the date of entry of any injunction, a report in writing
and under oath setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the
injunction;
D.
An Order requiring Defendant to account for and pay to Harley-Davidson any and
all profits arising from the foregoing acts of infringement, dilution, false designation of origin,
26
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 26 of 28 Document 1
false advertising, unfair competition, and an increasing of such profits for payment to HarleyDavidson in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1117, Wis. Stat. 132 et. seq., and other applicable
statutes and laws;
E.
an amount as yet undetermined caused by the foregoing acts of infringement, dilution, false
designation of origin, unfair competition, and trebling such compensatory damages for payment
to Harley-Davidson in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1117, Wis. Stat. 132 et. seq., and other
applicable statutes and laws;
F.
in this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117, and other applicable statutes and laws; and
H.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38, Harley-Davidson respectfully demands a trial by jury for
all claims so triable.
27
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 27 of 28 Document 1
28
Case 2:15-cv-00024-RTR Filed 01/08/15 Page 28 of 28 Document 1