Abstract
This paper describes the development of parallel spark EDM method. In the discharge circuit, the electrode is divided into multiple
electrodes, each of which is electrically insulated and connected to the pulse generator through a diode. A capacitor is inserted parallel to
each discharge gap between each electrode and workpiece (here workpiece is common for each electrode). Compared with conventional
EDM in which only a singular discharge can be generated for each pulse, multiple discharges can dispersively be generated for each pulse
in parallel spark EDM. Results of experiments on parallel spark EDM and conventional EDM show that not only is the machining process
more stable, but the machining speed and surface roughness can also be improved with parallel spark EDM.
2003 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: EDM; Parallel spark EDM; Multiple discharges; Simultaneous discharges; Large area finishing
1. Introduction
Electrical discharge machining (EDM) has the advantage
of high precision and is widely used in the machining of
metal molds. However, it comes with the major problem of
poor removal rate compared with the electrical chemical machining (ECM), milling and the like. The low removal rate
is due to the fact that discharge must be generated intermittently using a pulse generator and there is only one discharge
point for each pulse. The pulse is indispensable because the
plasma formed at the discharge point should be deionized
during the pulse interval so that the next discharge point can
be generated at some other place. Generally, the removal rate
can be improved by shortening the pulse interval, however,
when the pulse interval is shortened below a certain length,
the plasma cannot be extinguished during the pulse interval,
resulting in concentrated discharge [1]. Therefore, improving
the removal rate by generating discharges at multiple points
for each pulse will appears to be an appealing solution.
To generate discharges occur at two or more places, Fujimoto [2] developed a multi-circuit system of using a number
of discharge circuits and corresponding number of electrodes
to the circuit. It was reported that this method can improve
the machining speed. However, the demerit of this system is
that it needs a number of discharge circuits, which results a
high making cost when the number of the electrodes is larger.
Corresponding
66
Electrode
R d D1
D2
D3
Dn
Vcc
Cn
C3 C2 C1
Workpiece
Tr.
120
50
2
100
0.1
0.8
Cu
10 mm 10 mm
67
Fig. 2. Voltage and current waveforms of parallel spark EDM method using two electrodes.
Fig. 3. Voltage and current waveforms of parallel spark EDM method (simultaneous discharge).
di1
dt
(1)
Tr.
Electrode1
Diode
Electrode2
Vcc
a
Workpiece
Fig. 4. Measurement of voltage.
68
Fig. 5. Voltage and current waveforms of parallel spark EDM method (simultaneous discharge).
Tr.
69
Electrode 1
Electrode 2
Vcc
6
Normal discharge frequency[kHz]
In Section 3, it was found that simultaneous discharges occur easily in neighboring electrodes due to the induced electromotive force in parallel spark EDM. This fact indicates
that the discharge does not concentrate in one electrode, but
is distributed in all the electrodes uniformly. Hence, the parallel spark EDM method not only increases the machining
speed but also improves machining stability due to the dispersion of the discharge locations. Fig. 7 shows the change in
the normal discharge frequency with the lapse of time under
the condition that two electrodes are connected to the pulse
generator directly as shown in Fig. 8. Discharges are localized periodically and alternately in one of the pair electrodes.
Such phenomenon was also observed by Kojima et al. [7] using a discharge location detector. Based on the observation,
they presumed that the production of debris in one of the
pair electrodes decreases the breakdown strength, resulting
in enhanced localization of discharge locations in the same
electrode. In contrast, Fig. 9 shows the change in the discharge frequency with the lapse of time in the case of parallel
spark EDM. It was found that discharges occurred evenly in
both electrodes. Moreover, the total discharge frequency of
both electrodes was almost twice higher than that of the setup
shown in Fig. 8.
Workpiece
Electrode 1
Electrode 2
4
3
2
1
0
0
200
400
600
800
Time[s]
Fig. 9. Discharge frequency of parallel spark EDM method.
6
Electrode 1
Electrode 2
4
3
2
1
0
0
200
400
600
800
Time[s]
Fig. 7. Discharge frequency of conventional EDM method using branched
two electrodes.
Table 2
Machining conditions
Open voltage [V]
Discharge current [A]
Pulse duration [s]
Pulse interval [s]
120
50
2
100
70
Parallel electrode
Removal rate[mm3/min]
Single electrode
Removal rate[mm3/min]
2
1.5
1
0.5
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
20
40
60
80
Electrode numbers
Fig. 12. Relationship between removal rate and electrode numbers.
Fig. 10. Relationship between removal rate and servo reference voltage.
71
25mm
0.8mm
25mm
Electrode
Y
X
Workpiece
Fig. 13. Large area finishing using parallel spark EDM method.
than that (Ry 25 m) obtained by conventional EDM. Consequently, use of parallel spark EDM in large area finishing
not only improves machining process stability, but machining speed, and surface roughness as well.
6. Conclusions
A new parallel spark EDM method was developed. The
experiments show that multiple discharges can be generated
one by one or simultaneously during a single charging with
this method. In addition, the discharge can be distributed over
all the electrodes uniformly, resulting in stable machining.
The experimental results obtained from the parallel spark
EDM and conventional EDM show this new method not only
improves machining process stability, but machining speed,
and surface roughness as well.
References
72