rotordynamics

© All Rights Reserved

8 tayangan

rotordynamics

© All Rights Reserved

- Syllabus
- Eccentric Check for 12 piles group
- IITian Pace Phy1&2
- muk5 - Copy
- mechanics - chapter 4
- Momentum
- Mechanics New 1
- Motion
- lecture32.pdf
- OASYS3
- Instrumentation 5
- VAM TOP Torque Table
- Time Delays May Come From the Retardation of Either a Controller or an Actuator In
- Rep
- Fiitjee 35 36 Sol
- Adams Basic Syllabus - 5 Days (1).pdf
- VD estimation Kalman filtering
- SIMULATION OF METEORQID-VELOCITY IMPACT BY USE F DENSE PROJECTILE
- 17..6.CONVDIFF.pptx
- He Analysis and Modification of Spur Gear Design

Anda di halaman 1dari 17

in)

CHAPTER 8

Bearings commonly used in heavy rotating machine play a significant role in the dynamic behaviour

of rotors. Of particular interest are the hydrodynamic bearings, which are self acting and capable of

carrying heavy loads. Because the thin film that separates the moving surfaces supports the rotor load,

these bearing acts like a spring and provide damping due to squeeze film effect. The stiffness and

damping properties of the oil film significantly alter the critical speeds and out-of-balance-response of

a rotor, lowering its critical speed by up to 25 % in practice. In addition, rotor instability occurs,

which is self excited vibration arising out of the bearing fluid film effects and this is an important

factor to be considered in the rotor design. In fluid film bearings, the hydrodynamic pressure is

generated between the bearing and journal surfaces by the motion of the journal, from which the

resultant dynamic bearing force can be derived. For small vibration about the steady state equilibrium

position of the journal, we can define linearized bearing stiffness and damping coefficients. In this

chapter, the fluid film bearing characteristics (coefficients) are discussed for short bearing

approximation. Natural whirl frequency and stability analyses are done for speed independent and

speed dependent bearing characteristics. Guyan condensation scheme is utilized to decrease the size of

system matrices in case of fourteen-element model.

Fluid film bearing stiffness & damping coefficients, direct as well as cross-coupled, stiffness and

damping can be derived based on short bearing approximation (where pressure variation in the

circumferential direction is assumed to be negligible compared with that in the axial direction and

converse applies for long bearing approximation; Lee, 1993). The stiffness and damping coefficients

are functions of the eccentricity (load), the rotational speed and the temperature. If we evaluate the

linearized coefficients, assuming small changes in displacements and velocities from a steady state

equilibrium position as shown in Fig. 8.1, we may write the equilibrium equation as

f y

k yy

=

k zy

f z

k yz v c yy

k zz w czy

c yz v

czz w

(8.1)

where kij and cij are the stiffness and damping coefficients, with i representing the direction of force

and j representing the direction of displacement and velocity. The eight linearized stiffness and

damping coefficients depend on the steady state operating conditions of the journal, and in particular,

upon the rotational speed.

Figure 8.1 Locus of journal equilibrium position for short bearing (Lee, 1993)

For the short bearing, the dimensionless bearing stiffness and damping coefficients as a function of

the steady state eccentricity ratio of bearing, Kij =kijC/W, Cij =cijC/W, i, j = y, z, are given by Lee

(1993),

K yy =

K yz =

K zy =

)

(

(

)

) }

) }

4 2 + 32 + 2 2 + 2 16 2 4 Q ( )

;

1 2

4 2 + 32 + 2 2 + 2 16 2 4 Q ( )

(1 2 )

) }

2 2 2 2 2 16 2 4 Q ( )

(1

) }

K zz = 4 2 2 + 16 2 2 Q ( )

(8.2)

and

C yy =

C zz =

2 2 + 2 24 2 2 + 2 4 Q ( )

(1

(1 ){

2

) }

+ 2 2 8 2 Q ( )

(8.3)

where

Q ( ) =

{ (1 ) + 16 }

2

2 3/ 2

) }

C yz = C zy = 8 2 + 2 2 8 2 Q ( )

S=

361

N r

=

P C

DLN r

W

.

C

To determine the stiffness and bearing coefficients of a short bearing, we first determine the

Sommerfield number, S. Here W is the bearing radial load, D is the journal diameter, L is the length of

bearing, is the viscosity of lubricant at operating temperature (usually given in the unit of

centipoise, 1 cp = 1.0054(10)-3 Nsec/m2), = 2N the rotational speed of journal, N the number of

revolutions per second, and C is the radial clearance. The eccentricity of the journal center defined as,

= e/C, where e is the journal equilibrium eccentricity. We can then determine the eccentricity ratio

under steady state operating conditions by

2

(1 2 )

L

S =

D 2 (1 2 ) + 16 2

2

(8.4)

While determining the eccentricity ratio, an iteration procedure is required, as equation (8.4) is

transcendental in nature. A plot of S as a function of eccentricity for L/D=0.5 short bearing according

to equation (8.4) is given in Fig. 8.2.

From the given geometric parameters of bearing and its operating conditions the Sommerfield

number, S, can be obtained. From Figure 8.2 eccentricity ratio, , can be obtained for a particular

Sommerfield number. Once the eccentricity ratio is obtained the stiffness and damping coefficients

are obtained from equations (8.2) and (8.3). These are given (For L/D =0.5, bearing load, W =

1181.88 N, radial clearance, C = 0.00254 cm, and viscosity at operating temperature, = 0.0242 N

sec/m2) as a function of speed in Table 8.1 & in Figure 8.3 for direct and cross-coupled stiffness

coefficients and in Table 8.2 & in Figure 8.4 for direct and cross-coupled damping coefficients (these

values will be used for illustration in section 8.4).

362

Table 8.1

Speed in

rpm

Stiffness coefficients N/m2 (Direct and cross-coupled)

Kyy

Kyz

Kzy

Kzz

1000

3.936821e+09

6.809046e+08

1.623416e+08

7.643129e+07

2000

2.858729e+09

5.830242e+08

1.363980e+08

7.688122e+07

4000

2.105380e+09

5.503287e+08

1.401673e+08

9.913111e+07

6000

1.635817e+09

7.468616e+08

9.895919e+07

7.810302e+07

8000

1.410633e+09

7.170087e+08

9.035882e+07

7.855623e+07

10000

1.267522e+09

3.968864e+08

8.442852e+07

7.892672e+07

12000

1.151563e+09

3.798138e+08

7.929070e+07

7.929333e+07

14000

1.074176e+09

3.679887e+08

7.566316e+07

7.958118e+07

16000

9.898842e+08

3.546709e+08

7.149753e+07

7.994483e+07

19000

9.075716e+08

3.411792e+08

6.717485e+07

8.036354e+07

Table 8.2

Speed in

rpm

Damping coefficients N sec/m2 (Direct and cross-coupled)

Cyy

Cyz = Czy

Czz

1000

9.771283e+06

7.665431e+05

1.325797e+05

2000

7.186395e+06

3.852731e+05

9.857461e+04

4000

1.943713e+06

3.343040e+05

8.823743e+04

6000

1.071831e+06

1.302347e+05

3.557666e+04

8000

7.507976e+05

9.817935e+04

2.902359e+04

10000

5.720564e+05

7.887238e+04

2.469650e+04

12000

7.565297e+05

6.599767e+04

2.176765e+04

14000

3.793448e+05

5.675179e+04

1.944188e+04

16000

3.201499e+05

7.985925e+04

1.786434e+04

19000

2.595662e+05

7.218133e+04

1.585703e+04

respect to rotational speed

respect to rotational speed

363

The classical linearized model with eight spring and damping coefficients is employed for the

modelling of bearings in the present work. In this model, the forces at each bearing are assumed to

obey the governing equations of the following form

c yy

c

zy

c yz b k yy

{q } + k

czz

zy

k yz b

{q } = { F b }

k zz

(8.5)

where {q b } = {v w} is the bearing displacement vector and cij and kij are the bearing and damping

T

The bearing equations of motion (8.5) included in the equations of motion of the rotor substructure,

which include the rotary inertia, shear and gyroscopic effects. The resultant system equations of

motion then becomes

s

(8.6)

where [Cb] and [Kb] are the bearing damping and stiffness matrices respectively. To determine the

whirl speeds and stability equation (8.6) can be rewritten as

(8.7)

where

[ 0]

M s

,

[ A] =

M s C b G s

M s [ 0]

and

[B] =

[ 0]

K s

{q}

{h} =

{q}

(8.8)

The associated eigen value problem for equation (8.7) is sought from an assumed solution form as

{h} = {h0 } et

(8.9)

(8.10)

[ 0]

1

K s M s

}{

[I ]

{h } = 1 {h }

0

s 1

s 1

s

0

K [ C ] + K G

364

where = + j p is the complex eigen values and p is the natural whirl frequency. The real part of

the eigen value indicates the damping in the system at the given speed and it is associated with each

whirl speed. The parameter of logarithmic decrement, , is defined as

2

p

(8.11)

where represents the instability threshold when < 0. The response of a dynamic system is a decay

function, which involves the damping term. In order to get stable response the amplitude of vibration

should decay as time increases. This will happen if the damping index ( < 0) is negative. Eigen

values are of the form v = ip where p is the natural whirl frequency (speed dependent) and is

the damping. The logarithmic decrement is defined as

where

2

p

is negative stable

is positive

is positive unstable

is negative

> 0 stable

< 0 unstable

Campbell diagram can be drawn similar to gyroscopic couple effects. Here also forward and

backward whirls will occur. Stability can be checked by observing the sine of logarithmic decrement.

Eigen vectors will be complex.

Example 8.1 Obtain the assembled system equations of motion by the finite element method for

transverse vibrations of rotor-bearing system as shown in Figure 8.5. Consider shaft as continuous

system i.e. mass and stiffness is distributed continuously throughout the shaft. The shaft is of 1 m of

span and the diameter is 0.05 m with the mass density of 7800 kg/m3. The shaft is supported at ends

by flexible bearings as shown in Figure 8.5. Consider the motion in both the vertical and horizontal

planes. Discretise the shaft into one-element and show elemental equations for the shaft and bearings.

Take the following bearing properties:

365

For bearing A: kxx = 20 MN/m, kyy = 15 MN/m, kxy = -1.5 MN/m, kyx = 25 MN/m,

cxx = 200 kN-s/m, cxy = 150 kN-s/m, cyx = 140 kN-s/m, cyy = 400 kN-s/m,

and

for bearing B: kxx = 24 MN/m, kyy = 17 MN/m, kxy = -2.5 MN/m, kyx = 30 MN/m,

cxx = 210 kN-s/m, cxy = 160 kN-s/m, cyx = 135 kN-s/m, cyy = 380 kN-s/m.

shaft

bearings

Obtained the Campbell diagram to show critical speeds and stability thresholds.

c1yy

1

c zx

1

c1yz u y1 k yy

+ 1

c1zz u z1 k zy

k 1yz u y1 f yb1

=

k 1zz u z1 f zb1

(A)

y

x

x

1

z

z

x

1

(a) A rotor-bearing system

EOM of the bearing at location 2 can be written as

2

c yy

2

c zx

2

c yz2 u y 2 k yy

+

2

c zz2 u z 2 k zy

k yz2 u y 2 f yb2

=

k zz2 u z 2 f zb2

366

(B)

c1yy

0

c1zy

0 c1yz

0 0

0 c1zz

2

c yy

0

czy2

0 c 2yz

0 0

0 czz2

0 u y1 k 1yy

0 z1 0

+

0 u z1 k 1zy

0 y1 0

0 k 1yz

0 0

0 k 1zz

0 u y 2 k yy2

0 z 2 0

+

0 u z 2 k zy2

0 y 2 0

0 k yz2

0 0

0 k zz2

0 u y1 f yb1

0 z1 0

=

0 u z1 f zb1

0 y1 0

(C)

0 u y 2 f yb2

0 z 2 0

=

0 u z 2 f zb2

0 y 2 0

(D)

and

c1yy

0

c1zy

0

0

0

0

0 c1yz

0 0

0

0

0 c1zz

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

2

0 c yy

0 0

0 czy2

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

0 0

0 c yz2

0 0

0 czz2

0 0

0 u y1 k 1yy

0 z1 0

0 u z1 k 1zy

0 y1 0

+

0 u y 2 0

0 z 2 0

0 u z 2 0

0 y 2 0

0 k 1yz

0 0

0

0

0 k 1zz

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 k yy2

0 0

0 k zy2

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

0 0

0 k yz2

0 0

0 k zz2

0 0

0 u y1 f yb1

0 z1 0

0 u z1 f zb1

0 y 1 0

=

0 u y 2 f yb2

0 z 2 0

0 u z 2 f zb2

0 y 2 0

EOM of the shaft element considering the single element as shown in Figure 8.5(b), is given as

0 54 13 0

0 uy1

156 22 0

4

0

0 13 3

0

0 z1

156 22 0

0

54 13 uz1

4

0

0

13 3 y1

AL

156 22 0

0 uy 2

420

4

0

0 z 2

156 22 uz 2

4 y 2

sym

367

(E)

6

0

0 12 6

0

0 u y1 S y1

12

6

4

0

0 6 2

0

0 z1 M z1

0

0 12

6

0

0 12 6 u z1 S z1

0

6

4

0

0 6 2 y1 M y1

EI 0

+ 3

=

0 12 6 0

0 u y 2 S y 2

l 12 6 0

2

0

0 6 4

0

0 z 2 M z 2

6

0

0 12 6 0

0 12 6 u z 2 S z 2

0

6

2

0

0 6 4 y 2 M y 2

0

(F)

Combining equations (E) and (F), we get equations of motion of the rotor-bearing system, as

0 54 13 0

0 uy1 c1yy

156 22 0

4

0

0 13 3

0

0 z1 0

156 22 0

0

54 13 uz1 c1zy

4

0

0

13 3 y1 0

AL

+

156 22 0

0 uy 2 0

420

4

0

0 z 2 0

156 22 uz 2 0

4 y 2 0

(12 + k 1yy k ) 6

6

4

1

0

k zy k

0

0

EI

+ 3

l

12

6

6

2

0

0

0

0

0 c1yz

1

zz

0 c

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 c yy2

0 c yz2

2

zy

0 czz2

0 0

0

0

0

0

k 1yz k

12

12

(12 + k

12

(12 + k

1

zz

k)

0

2

yy

k ) 6

6

k

1

zy

6

2

yz

k /k

(12 + k

2

zz

k)

0 c

0 0

0 u y1

0 z1

0 u z1

0 y1

0 u y 2

0 z 2

0 u z 2

0 y 2

0

b

u y1 S y1 + f y1 0

0 M

z1

0

z1

6 u z1 S z1 + f zb1 0

2 y1 M y1 0

=

+

b

0 u y 2 S y 2 + f y 2 0

0 z 2 M z 2 0

u z 2 S + f b 0

z2

z2

6

M

y2

y2

4

(G)

In the right hand side the first vector represents reaction forces and moments and second vector is

corresponding to the external forces and moments. The reaction force vector will become zero.

(H)

{h} = [D]{h}

(I)

368

where

[ D ] = 1

[ M ] [ c ]

1

[M ]

;

[ k ]

{u}

{h} =

{u}

(J)

Let

{h} = {h0 }e vt

(K)

v {h0 } = [ D ] {h0 }

(L)

To demonstrate the application of finite element model, a typical rotor bearing system as illustrated in

Fig. 4.11 is analyzed to determine the whirl speeds and stability. The distributed rotor is modelled as

seven and fourteen element member and both the bearings are to be taken identical. The geometric

and physical data of these elements are same as of Example 4.4. The fluid film bearings are idealized

as a linear short bearing (L/D = 0.5) and are located at stations two and seven for the case of sevenelement model and three and thirteen for the case of fourteen-element model. The following two cases

of bearing characteristics are analyzed: (a) Speed independent bearing characteristics and (b) Speed

dependent bearing characteristics.

(a) Speed independent bearing characteristics. Bearing geometric and physical data are as follows:

diameter of the bearing, D = 2.54 cm, length of bearing, L = 1.27 cm, (i.e. L/D = 0.5), radial clearance,

C = 0.00254 cm, and viscosity at operating temperature, = 0.0242 N sec/m2. The direct as well as the

cross-coupled stiffness and damping coefficients are found at spin speed 4000 rpm. These are

369

K yzb = 0.55 109 N/m, K zyb = 0.14 109 N/m, K zzb = 0.091 109 N/m

C yyb = 1.94 106 N sec/m, C yzb = C zyb = 0.33 106 N sec/m, C zzb = 0.081 106 N sec/m

These bearing characteristics are taken as constants for all other speeds of the rotor i.e. these values

are treated as speed independent characteristics of the bearing for illustration (but we could have take

bearing characteristics at any other spin speeds). In order to illustrate a Jeffcott rotor model (simply

supported massless shaft with a central disk) mounted on flexible identical bearings having direct and

cross-coupled stiffness coefficients (without damping) is analyzed. Critical speeds from the classical

closed form solutions (Rao, 1996; Appendix 8.1) and from the present analysis are tabulated in Table

8.3 for the comparison. It shows that the present code results are in excellent agreement with the

classical solutions.

Table 8.3 Comparisons of critical speeds from classical solutions and from the present analysis for

Jeffcott rotor model (simply supported massless shaft with a central disk) mounted on flexible

identical bearings

Critical speeds from the

Critical speeds from the

classical solutions*

present FEM code

(rad/sec)

(rad/sec) p(7)#

143.85

142.69

140.68

138.92

The whirl frequencies a function of spin speed and the corresponding logarithmic decrements, for the

rotor system shown in Figure 2.3, are tabulated in Table 8.4 for seven-element rotor model. The whirl

frequency map and stability are presented in Fig. 8.5. The letters F and B refers to forward and

backward whirl modes, respectively. The first four critical speeds in forward & backward direction

and logarithmic decrement are tabulated in Table 8.5 for seven and fourteen element models. It is

observed that third & fourth forward whirl mode and all the backward whirl modes are stable for

entire spin-speed envelope studied. Condensation scheme is performed in the case of fourteenelement rotor model. Here all the rotational degrees of freedoms except at lumped mass and bearing

stations taken as slave degrees of freedom (total no. stations = 15, , no. of DOF at each node = 4, total

no. of lumped stations = 4 (at stations 5, 7, 9 & 11), total no. of bearing stations = 2 (at stations 3 and

13), no. of rotational DOF at each node = 2, total no. slave degrees of freedom = (15-6)2 = 18, final

DOF = (154) (92) = 42, final order of eigen value problem = 242 = 84). The first four critical

speeds in forward & backward direction and logarithmic decrement are also tabulated in Table 8.5.

The results show that up to second mode agreement is excellent as compared to the without

condensation scheme, and for third & fourth mode agreement is quite good. The comparison of the

370

critical speeds when the rotor is mounted on fluid film bearings is made with the critical speeds when

the rotor is mounted on rigid bearings and is given in Table 8.6. The comparison shows that with the

bearing characteristics the natural whirl frequencies are decreased especially for higher modes.

Table 8.4 Natural whirl frequency and logarithmic decrement as function of spin speed of a rotorbearing system supported on speed independent bearings.

Spin speed

(rad/sec)

0

418.88

837.76

1047.2

1256.64

1675.52

2097.4

(rad/sec)

Forward

Backward

Logarithmic decrement

Forward

Backward

115.68

432.75

693.90

883.11

117.28

436.48

697.1

889.49

119.64

443.57

697.29

901.00

120.85

447.37

697.39

907.43

122.08

451.21

697.49

917.02

127.56

458.94

697.69

927.29

127.07

466.63

697.89

940.40

0.0003

0.0165

0.3313

0.0765

-0.010

-0.007

0.330

0.0824

-0.011

-0.006

0.332

0.0809

-0.011

-0.006

0.3367

0.0802

-0.0121

-0.0056

0.335

0.0089

-0.0128

-0.0045

0.337

0.0792

-0.0136

-0.0034

0.341

0.079

0.0013

0.0010

0.3284

0.0022

0.0104

0.0252

0.3334

0.0001

0.0102

0.0244

0.3356

0.005

0.0099

0.0239

0.3337

0.00723

0.0096

0.02340

0.337

0.0797

0.0090

0.0224

0.339

0.0114

0.0084

0.0216

0.3422

0.01261

113.61

420.59

691.98

847.69

112.03

416.75

692.15

838.44

109.75

409.42

692.30

826.25

108.59

405.47

692.36

819.20

107.43

401.43

692.42

811.80

105.13

393.25

692.51

796.32

102.85

387.98

692.58

780.27

Fig. 8.5 Natural whirl frequency map and stability of rotorbearing system supported on speed

independent bearings.

371

Table 8.5 Critical speeds & logarithmic decrement of a rotor system supported on speed independent bearings

P(7)

p(14)

Forward

Backward

Forward

Backward

Mode

No.

#p(14)

Forward

Backward

115.00

117.28

115.10

117.29

115.79

117.48

(0.00709)*

(0.0057)

(0.00709)

(0.0057)

(0.0060)

(0.00636)

2

436.63

417.02

436.63

416.44

435.87

415.28

(-0.0076)

(0.0252)

(-0.0076)

(0.0252)

(-0.0069)

(0.024)

3

697.25

692.40

693.56

691.44

691.35

688.27

(0.3319)

(0.3347)

(0.33054)

(0.33372)

(0.339)

(0.00685)

4

903.13

826.44

902.50

825.96

901.5

812.88

(0.0806)

(0.0058)

(0.08077)

(0.00485)

(0.08030

(0.00392)

* The values in the parenthesis are logarithmic decrements, # Values obtained from condensation scheme by

taking the 18 rotational degrees of freedom as slaves at all nodes except at lumped mass bearing nodes.

Table 8.6 Comparison of critical speeds for the rotors mounted on rigid bearings against the fluid film bearings.

Mode

No.

critical

speeds

with rigid bearings

with fluid film bearings

(for

forward

Forward

Backward

Forward

Backward

whirl)

1

2

3

4

116.44

441.83

871.73

1226.35

115.14

427.71

818.5

1135.5

115.00

436.63

697.25

903.13

117.28

417.02

692.40

826.44

1.25

1.19

11.02

26.35

(a) Speed dependent bearing characteristics: The direct as well as cross-coupled stiffness and

damping coefficients are considered as speed dependent. These are calculated from the equations (8.2)

and (8.3) as a function of speed and given in Table 8.1 and 8.2 (For L/D =0.5, bearing load, W =

1888.2 N, radial clearance, C = 0.00254 cm, and viscosity at operating temperature, = 0.0242 N

sec/m2). The natural whirl frequencies, as a function of spin speed is determined from the equation

(8.10) for rotor-bearing system as shown in Figure 2.3. These are tabulated along with the logarithmic

decrement at each spin speed in Table 8.7 for seven-element model and are shown in Fig 8.6. The first

four critical speeds and corresponding logarithmic decrement are tabulated in Table 8.8 for seven and

fourteen element models. It is observed that third & fourth forward whirl mode and all the backward

whirl except fourth modes are stable for entire spin-speed envelope studied. Condensation scheme is

performed in case of fourteen-element model. The selection of slaves and order of eigen value

problem is same as the case (a). Results show that up to second mode agreement is excellent as

compared to the without condensation scheme, and for third & fourth mode agreement is quite good.

At the lower speeds (below 2000 rpm) the natural whirl frequencies happens to be infinite. We would

not able to explain this behaviour.

372

Fig 8.6 Whirl frequency map of rotorbearing system supported on speed dependent fluid film bearings.

Table 8.7 Natural whirl frequencies and logarithmic decrement as function of spin speed of a rotor

bearing system supported on speed dependent fluid film bearings.

Spin speed

Natural whirl frequencies

Logarithmic decrement

(rad/sec)

(rad/sec)

Forward

Backward

Forward

Backward

107.72

115.84

432.98

577.80

847.36

117.22

436.23

688.97

886.48

119.58

443.54

701.63

907.03

120.80

447.45

707.69

911.44

122.04

451.42

708.42.

918.57

123.28

455.39

711.33

925.42

125.79

463.33

717.10

938.74

418.88

837.76

1047.2

1256.64

1466.08

1887.96

113.23

423.15

573.03

*

111.93

416.23

685.16

838.27

109.69

409.17

700.24

826.74

109.69

405.28

705.60

820.17

109.69

401307

708.98

813.27

109.69

397.26

711.61

806.11

103.96

389.11

716.83

791.30

0.015402

0.002445

3.223702

0.003701

-0.00961

-0.00420

0.565563

0.097201

-0.01337

-0.01158

0.267101

0.076321

-0.01468

-0.01378

0.225162

0.075242

-0.01589

-0.01550

0.192820

0.076812

-0.01691

-0.01676

0.169752

0.078994

-0.01904

-0.01883

0.142446

0.087177

0.012393

0.012912

2.882490

*

0.012579

0.040687

0.530957

0.002730

0.012954

0.029706

0.258887

-0.005129

0.012999

0.028400

0.209098

-0.00795

0.013021

0.027825

0.177773

-0.009921

0.012911

0.02741

0.15542

-0.00110

0.012770

0.027341

0.128098

-0.011441

Table 8.8 Critical speeds & logarithmic decrement of a rotor system supported on speed dependent bearings

Mode

No.

1

p(7)

p(14)

Forward

Backward

Forward

Backward

p(14

Forward

Backward

115.87

113.17

115.90

113.13

115.91

373

113.22

(0.01248)

436.82

(-0.0058)

698.07

(0.22574)

909.62

(0.0778)

2

3

4

(0.00113)

416.44

(0.049)

696.01

(0.31872)

827.50

(-0.0077)

(0.0123)

436.40

(-0.0056)

697.36

(0.22129)

905.96

(0.0701)

(0.00113)

416.30

(0.041)

695.53

(0.3042)

827.12

(-0.0072)

(0.0124)

436.44

(-0.0058)

697.34

(0.2249)

906.35

(0.0778)

(0.00114)

416.25

(0.04896)

692.62

(0.3177)

827.5

(-0.00783)

For a simple Jeffcott rotor mounted on flexible identical bearings (having direct and cross-coupled

stiffness coefficients with no damping) the frequency equation can be written as (Rao, 1996):

2

1, 2

12 + 22

2

2 22

2 2

1

+ 1 11 2

2

where

12 =

and

K1 =

K1

K

K

K

; 22 = 2 ; 1 = 12 ; 2 = 21

m

m

K1

K2

K 2 K zz (2 K yy + K ) 4 K zy K yz

(2 K zz + K )(2 K yy + K ) 4 K zy K yz

K 12 =

2 K zy K 2

(2 K zz + K )(2 K yy + K ) 4 K zy K yz

K2 =

K 21 =

K 2 K yy (2 K zz + K ) 4 K zy K yz

(2 K zz + K )(2 K yy + K ) 4 K zy K yz

2 K yz K 2

(2 K zz + K )(2 K yy + K ) 4 K zy K yz

Here the following parameters are chosen: Kyy = 2.1 109 N/m2 & Kzz = 0.091 109 N/m2are the

direct stiffness coefficients, respectively and Kyz = 0.55 109 N/m2 & Kzy = 0.14 109 N/m2are the

cross-coupled stiffness coefficients, respectively. These are obtained for short bearing (L/D = 0.5) at

spin speed = 4000 rpm (these are same as those for speed independent bearing). And K = (n)2m is

the stiffness of the simple Jeffcott rotor, n = 145.27 rad/sec (chosen from Table 2.2 for first mode) is

the rigid bearing critical speed and m = 241.2 kg (total mass of four disks) is mass of the central disk

mounted on the shaft. The length and the diameter of the shaft are 3.5 m and 0.00522 m, respectively.

REFERENCES

Lee C.-W., 1993, Vibration Analysis of Rotors, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.

Rao, J. S., Rotor Dynamics, New Age International Publishers, Third Edition, 1996.

Exercise 8.1 A long rigid symmetric rotor is supported at ends by two identical bearings. Let the

shaft has the diameter of 0.2 m, the length of shaft is 1 m and the mass density of the shaft material

374

equal to 7800 kg/m3. The bearing dynamic characteristics are as follows: kxx = kyy = 1 kN/mm with

other stiffness and damping terms equal to zero. By considering the gyroscopic effect also, obtain

whirl natural frequencies of the system, if rotor is rotating at 10, 000 rpm.

Exercise 8.2 Find the critical speeds of the rotor bearing system shown in Figure E8.2. The shaft is

made of steel with Youngs modulus E = 2.1 (10)11 N/m2 and uniform diameter d = 10 mm. Treat the

shaft as flexible and massless. The mass of the disc is: md = 1 kg with negligible diamentral mass

moment of inertia. Bearings B1 and B2 are identical bearings and having the following properties: kyy

= 1.1 kN/m, kzz = 1.8 kN/m, kyz = 0.2 kN/m and kzy = 0.1 kN/m. The various shaft lengths are as

follows: B1D = 75 mm, and DB2 = 50 mm. Give the detailed steps involved in formulation of the

system equations.

X

Y

B1

B2

Z

Figure E8.2

Exercise 8.3 Obtain critical speeds of a rotor-bearing system as shown in Figure E8.2. The shaft is

made of steel with Youngs modulus E = 2.1 (10)11 N/m2, mass density of = 7800 kg/m3 and

uniform diameter d = 10 mm. Treat the shaft as flexible and having distributed mass. The mass of the

disc is: md = 1 kg with the diamentral mass moment of inertia Id = 0.02 kg-m2 and negligible polar

mass moment of inertia (i.e. gyroscopic effects neglected). Bearings B1 and B2 are identical bearings

and can be assumed as short bearing with L/D = 0.25, D = 10 mm and cr = 1 m. The kinetic

viscosity, , of the lubricant is 28 centi-Stokes at operating temperature ( 400 C ) and the specific

gravity is 0.87. Plot and use the short bearing dynamic parameters as given in Appendix 8.1. The

various shaft lengths are as follows: B1D = 75 mm, and DB2 = 50 mm. Give the detailed steps

involved in formulation of system equations.

Exercise 8.4 (a) Find the bending critical speed of the system shown in Figure E8.2 in which the disc

is made of solid steel with a diameter of 127 mm, and a thickness of 25.4 mm. The mass density of

the steel is 7800 kg/m3. The disc D is placed in the middle of a shaft and the total length of the steel

shaft between bearings is 508 mm, and its diameter is 12.7 mm. The bearings have equal flexibility in

all directions, the constant for either one of them being k = 175 N/m. (b) Solve the same problem as

375

part (a) except that the bearings have different vertical and horizontal flexibilities: khoz = 175 N/m and

khoz = 350 N/m for each of the bearings. Neglect the cross-coupled stiffness coefficients and the mass

of the shaft.

Exercise 8.5 Draw the first three modes, associated with the lowest three natural frequencies of a

flexible uniform shaft as hwon In Figure E8.5, with increasing support stiffness i.e.

(i) K = 0 (ii) 0 < K < (iii) K .

Figure E8.5

376

- SyllabusDiunggah olehMike Hoot
- Eccentric Check for 12 piles groupDiunggah olehAlsonChin
- IITian Pace Phy1&2Diunggah olehLokesh Kumar
- muk5 - CopyDiunggah olehMuhammed Muktar
- mechanics - chapter 4Diunggah olehsanjivtis
- MomentumDiunggah olehahmedyashar
- Mechanics New 1Diunggah olehKanishka_Veedi_3183
- MotionDiunggah olehvinkumar_hbti
- lecture32.pdfDiunggah olehAnkan Gayen
- Instrumentation 5Diunggah olehjlcastroa
- VAM TOP Torque TableDiunggah olehKhaledFekair
- Fiitjee 35 36 SolDiunggah olehBHAAJI0001
- OASYS3Diunggah olehPimsree Mecute
- Time Delays May Come From the Retardation of Either a Controller or an Actuator InDiunggah olehpankaj arvikar
- Adams Basic Syllabus - 5 Days (1).pdfDiunggah olehAshwin Raghavan
- 17..6.CONVDIFF.pptxDiunggah olehvivekzz
- RepDiunggah olehVardhan
- VD estimation Kalman filteringDiunggah olehtrisino
- SIMULATION OF METEORQID-VELOCITY IMPACT BY USE F DENSE PROJECTILEDiunggah olehqwerty11111-1
- He Analysis and Modification of Spur Gear DesignDiunggah olehPrakash Kumar Sen
- 7-Polyflow_12.1-adaptDiunggah olehwoongs73
- DeeDiunggah olehNick Cogan
- Design of Structural Element SampleDiunggah olehSudipThapa
- Dynamic FoundationDiunggah olehdovi01
- Frame With SettlementDiunggah olehjoe
- CODiunggah olehAnonymous 3sHEQD
- AHU Friction Loss CalculationsDiunggah olehAdnan Attish
- FORMUALAS OF PHYSICS FOR JEE MAINS_ADVANCED AND NEET.pdfDiunggah olehRanjan Kumar
- muro de contencionDiunggah olehPhilip Peterson
- Web Geometry - How to AdoptDiunggah olehAnonymous ARMtmNKL

- Surface Coating Operations MetalsDiunggah olehRaj Patel
- JSIR 72(6) 373-378Diunggah olehmghgol
- Full 64256 Ok OkDiunggah olehmghgol
- 1_design and Analysis of Impeller Blade for Axial Flow PumpsDiunggah olehmghgol
- CM Lecture 4Diunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 05bDiunggah olehmghgol
- Divan Iraj Mirza.pdfDiunggah olehmeysamshabnavaa
- 1001-shab-1Diunggah olehozmera
- Rtiwari Rd Book 09Diunggah olehmghgol
- Atmospheric Corrosion MechanismDiunggah olehmghgol
- Introduction to Pump Rotor Dynamics.pdfDiunggah olehJose Prado
- Suri Rotor BalancingDiunggah olehDhaval Bhayani
- 19790014348Diunggah olehmghgol
- p0155Diunggah olehmghgol
- Jp c Purdue Pump PaperDiunggah olehgunjandpatel05
- AIAA-2011-5932Diunggah olehmghgol
- AIAA-2011-1938 (1)Diunggah olehmghgol
- 126Elamy (1)Diunggah olehmghgol
- Acoustics Based Condition MonitoringDiunggah olehDeniz Yazgaç
- Rtiwari Rd Book 11cDiunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 12Diunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 11aDiunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 10Diunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 05aDiunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 06cDiunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 06bDiunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 03cDiunggah olehmghgol
- Rtiwari Rd Book 03bDiunggah olehmghgol

- vaspDiunggah olehRosely Maria
- Design of Deep Beams and JointsDiunggah olehnavern10
- Robust PID power system stabilizer design based on pole placement and nonlinear programming methods.pdfDiunggah olehnelson_herrera
- Free EnergyDiunggah olehquan123456789
- ScienceDiunggah olehMichelle Miranda
- strps_15_3Diunggah olehAkanksha Chattopadhyay
- Manual of AeroelasticityDiunggah olehAriel Gamarra Rc
- 10.1016@j.compgeo.2019.02.019Diunggah olehabidah fitra
- IS 1893 part IV revised.pdfDiunggah olehAsish Subrahmanyam
- Dynamic Analysis and Design of Large Diameter LNG Tanks to Resist Seismic Events - by Navin Peris, Andrew Cushing, Zygmunt Lubkowski, and David ScarrDiunggah olehAndrew Cushing
- Chapter 1Diunggah olehAbdullah Helmi
- HydraulicsDiunggah olehmcad12
- Lecture_8_9[1]Diunggah olehSadiq Sarfaraz
- Astm a1034Diunggah olehjenhua82
- MicrofractureI & IIDiunggah olehmhk665
- Planck Scale, Relativity Meets Quantum Mechanics Meets GravityDiunggah olehExcaliburka
- HT_QB_6BDiunggah olehaeroacademic
- paperDiunggah olehRaghav Garg
- 13S1 FE1073 C2-Deformation of Elastic BodyDiunggah olehglenlcy
- Ocean TurbulenceDiunggah olehJaqueline Palmeira
- EN1993 BenchmarksDiunggah olehDomostatikos
- Introduction to quantum field theory, based on the book by Peskin and SchroederDiunggah olehKristinnK
- P2132000 Angulos de EulerDiunggah olehDenis PA
- UT cw EOC .docDiunggah olehБарнс Бранн
- Motions and Forces in Rope SystemDiunggah olehDavid Andrés Bessalle Reyes
- 1.2 Resolving & MomentsDiunggah olehAbid Jan
- 0625_m19_qp_42Diunggah olehNurulAinMatAron
- HW10Diunggah olehHarvin Waraich
- kuis IRDiunggah olehtawa
- Modelling and Control of IR_EO-gimbalDiunggah olehStefan Glaser

## Lebih dari sekadar dokumen.

Temukan segala yang ditawarkan Scribd, termasuk buku dan buku audio dari penerbit-penerbit terkemuka.

Batalkan kapan saja.