Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • Peer Review Checklist: Does The Document Fulfill Its Purpose? Put A Mark or Y/N

    Diunggah oleh

    Feroze Aalekh
    23 tayangan2 halaman
    The document is a peer review checklist for reviewing documents. It contains sections for reviewing the overall purpose and understandability of the document, the language and writing style, information design, and screen design. It also has sections to record any major or minor errors found in areas like language, graphics, information design, and others. Reviewers are asked to indicate whether specific review factors are met and provide counts of any major or minor errors found in specific categories. The checklist aims to help reviewers ensure documents are clear, concise, easy to understand and navigate, well-designed, and free of errors.

    Deskripsi Asli:

    This document defines a peer review process for a content document by a content peer reviewer.

    Judul Asli

    Content Peer Review Process

    Hak Cipta

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Format Tersedia

    DOC, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    The document is a peer review checklist for reviewing documents. It contains sections for reviewing the overall purpose and understandability of the document, the language and writing style, information design, and screen design. It also has sections to record any major or minor errors found in areas like language, graphics, information design, and others. Reviewers are asked to indicate whether specific review factors are met and provide counts of any major or minor errors found in specific categories. The checklist aims to help reviewers ensure documents are clear, concise, easy to understand and navigate, well-designed, and free of errors.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai DOC, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    23 tayangan2 halaman

    Peer Review Checklist: Does The Document Fulfill Its Purpose? Put A Mark or Y/N

    Diunggah oleh

    Feroze Aalekh
    The document is a peer review checklist for reviewing documents. It contains sections for reviewing the overall purpose and understandability of the document, the language and writing style, information design, and screen design. It also has sections to record any major or minor errors found in areas like language, graphics, information design, and others. Reviewers are asked to indicate whether specific review factors are met and provide counts of any major or minor errors found in specific categories. The checklist aims to help reviewers ensure documents are clear, concise, easy to understand and navigate, well-designed, and free of errors.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai DOC, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 2

    Peer Review Checklist

    Document Title:

    Part Number:

    Author:

    Reviewer:

    Product/OS:

    Review Date:

    Does the document fulfill its purpose? (circle the overall section rating*)

    Put a mark or Y/N

    Review Factors

    Yes/No

    Doesnt
    Apply

    GENERAL
    Is the purpose of the information clear?
    Are there overviews or introductions? Do they effectively orient users and provide context?
    Is it easy to find specific information, to navigate from one topic to another, and to return to where you
    started?
    Can you find what you want in a reasonable length of time?
    Is information clear and helpful?
    Is information effective for the intended audience?
    LANGUAGE/WRITING
    Are sentences simple, and written in active voice and present tense?
    Is the language clear, concise, and in the appropriate tone?
    Are procedures (if used) presented in clear sequential steps?
    INFORMATION DESIGN
    Do the titles and headings clearly identify the information that follows?
    Are lists, tables, graphics, etc. used to economically replace text?
    Does the entry provide signposts to orient the user?
    SCREEN DESIGN
    Are the screens easy to read?
    Does the design minimize the need to scroll where possible?
    Is the design appealing and inviting?
    GRAPHICS
    Are graphics used effectively to replace words or communicate concepts?
    Are the graphics attractive and of high quality?
    OVERALL QUALITY
    Do all of the elements such as hyperlinks and navigational tools resolve correctly and behave in the
    expected manner without error?
    Is the content consistent, easy to read, and accurate?
    Is the interface consistent, easy to use, and reliable?

    Error Statistics
    Category

    Count
    Major

    Language/Writing (includes jargons, parallelism, articles, active voice, punctuation, lists etc)
    Graphics/Formatting
    Information Design/Flow/Continuity
    Others, if any (please specify!)

    Minor

    Major Errors:

    Sentence constructions: Includes passive voice constructions, lengthy sentences, coherence issues, lack of
    parallelism.
    Punctuation errors

    Spelling errors

    Readability errors: use of jargon, difficult words

    Digressions from the Style Guide

    Organization of content

    Errors in Index

    Errors in Documentation Information/Preface: includes errors in legal notices, part numbers, etc

    Navigation: broken links:-hyperlinks, cross references

    Lists and Procedures

    Errors in Section Headings

    Errors in figures, tables, and illustrations

    Minor Errors

    Consistency errors: Examples - man page vs manpage, email vs e-mail

    errors in abbreviations and acronyms: expanding at first occurrence

    Formatting issues: errors in wrapping words in formats

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai