Anda di halaman 1dari 68

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

______________________________________________________________________________

Engineering Design Basis

Ductwork Design Program

Copyright 1998 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. All rights reserved.


______________________________________________________________________________

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Air Flow and Pressure Analysis


Preliminary Analysis
Information that is required to analyze a duct system for flow, pressures and sizes include:

Supply or extract air quantities for each terminal device (diffuser, register, grille) in the room.
The location of the terminal device in the room and the routing of ductwork from fan to
terminal
Design criteria limits for the project. These include:
Sizing method and associated velocity limits
Ductwork dimensional criteria
Static and total pressure limits to be used in
Fan Selection
Ductwork design and sizing

Air quantities for terminal devices located in each room can be calculated by the HVAC
Application Loads Program. Locating terminal devices, assigning air quantities to them and
during graphic input routing ductwork from the fans to the terminal devices.

Q=

AV
c f

Sizing Principles
Duct design is essentially a solution of two basic equations, the relationship between duct
velocity, air quantity and duct cross-sectional area, Eq. 1, and Bernoulli's energy balance
equation, Eq. 2.

V1
V2

+ P z 1 + P 1 + Z 1 =
+ P Z 2 + P 2 + Z 2 + P t
2 gc
2 gc
where: 1,2
A
V
Q
gc
P

= subscripts for stations 1 and 2 in the system


= cross-sectional area of duct (sq in.)
= fluid average velocity (ft/min)
= airflow rate (cu ft/min)
= dimensional constant (lbm - ft)/(lbf - s2)
= static pressure (lbf/sq ft)
= fluid density (lbm/sq ft)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

g
Z
P1, P2
PZ1, PZ2
Pt
cf

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

g = specific weight (lbf/cu ft)


= __
gc
= acceleration due to gravity (ft/sec2)
= elevation (ft)
= gage pressures at stations 1 and 2 (lb/sq ft)
= atmospheric pressures at elevations Z1 and Z2
= total pressure loss between station 1 and station 2 in the system (lbf/sq
ft)
= conversion factor (144)

When the specific weight of atmospheric air a is constant, it can be written that:

P Z 1 - P Z 2 = a Z 2 - Z 1
Assuming that the specific weight of atmospheric air equals that of air within the duct, and
combining Eq. 2 and 3 yields:
2

V 1 + P1 = V 2 + P 2 + P t
2 gc
2 gc
Head and Pressure
Head and pressure are often used interchangeably, but these terms have specific meanings.
Head is the height of a fluid column supported by fluid flow, while pressure is the normal force
per unit area. With a liquid, it is convenient to measure the head of a fluid in terms of the
flowing fluid. With a gas or air, however, it is customary to measure pressure on a column of
liquid.

Static Pressure
Air exerts pressure on the walls of the duct in which it is confined. This pressure Ps is called static
pressure at a station in the system and is positive or negative according to whether the pressure
is greater or less than the ambient atmospheric pressure.

Velocity Pressure
The term ( V2/2gc) in Eq. 2 is called the velocity pressure. Acting in the same direction as the
flow of air, it is a measure of the kinetic energy. The velocity head (V2/2g) is independent of fluid
density, while velocity pressure is not independent of density.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

V
Pv =

c f
where: Pv
V

cf

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

= velocity pressure (in. of water)


= fluid mean velocity (ft/min)
= fluid density (lbm/cu ft)
= conversion factor (1097)

Total Pressure
Total pressure is the sum of static pressure and velocity pressure:

Pt = P s + Pv
V
Pt = P s +

c f
where: Pt
Ps
Pv

= total pressure (in. of water)


= static pressure (in. of water)
= velocity pressure (in. of water)

The pressure loss Pt in Eq. 2 is the resistance of a section of a duct system to flow and is
composed of two elements:

Duct friction, which as the name implies, is the frictional drag of the fluid moving along a
rough surface, the duct wall.
Dynamic loss, caused by restrictions and changes in direction to the flow through a piece of
equipment (volume damper, heating coil, sound attenuator, etc.) and duct fittings.

Frictional Losses
When air flows through a duct, there is a loss of pressure due to the frictional drag of the air
moving along the surfaces of the ducts.
For air flow in ducts, the friction loss may be calculated by the Darcy-Weisbach equation:

Pf r= f d
where:
V

V
L

c
x
x

D
c f 2

= fluid density (lbm/cu ft)


= fluid mean velocity (ft/min)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Pfr
fd
L
D
cf1
cf2

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

= friction losses in terms of total pressure (in. of water)


= friction factor, dimensionless
= duct length (ft)
= equivalent internal diameter of duct (in.)
= conversion factor (12)
= conversion factor (1097)

Air flow in ducts follow two very different regimes: laminar flow at low velocities, and turbulent
at high velocities. A transition zone in which flow may be either laminar or turbulent exists
between the laminar and fully developed turbulent regions. Experimentation has determined
two Reynolds numbers for which the flow is entirely laminar or turbulent. This dimensionless
quantity, known as the Reynolds number Re, is defined by:

Re - c f x
where: D
V

cf

V D

= equivalent internal diameter of duct (in.)


= fluid velocity in an equivalent round duct (ft/min)
= fluid density (lbm/cu ft)
= fluid dynamic viscosity (lbm/ft x hr)
= conversion factor (5)

Within the region of laminar flow (Reynolds numbers less than 2100). The friction factor f d is a
function of the Reynolds number only, and it is ndependent of the roughness coefficient of the
duct wall. It is defined by:

fd=

64
Re

In completely turbulent regions (Reynolds numbers greater than 4000), the friction fd depends on
the relative roughness of the duct material. It is independent of the Reynolds number and
defined by:

D
= 1.14 + 2 log

c
f

fd

In the transition zone (Reynolds numbers between 2100 and 4000), the fraction fd depends on
duct material absolute roughness and the Reynolds number represented by the Colebrook
equation:

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

D
9.3
- 2 log 1 +
= 1.14 + 2 log
fd
R e c f / D
c f

where:
cf

f d

= duct material absolute roughness (ft)


= conversion factor, (12)

If the air flow is smooth (Re < 2100), then Eq. 10 is used to determine the friction factor fd to
solve the Darcy-Weisbach equation, Eq. 8, for friction drop through the duct section. To
differentiate between transitional and rough turbulent flows, a value for fd is calculated from the
equation for rough turbulent flows. Eq. 11. This is then used in Eq. 13 which is a close
approximation of the curve which separates the rough flow from transitional on the Moody chart
(ASHRAE Handbook: 1981 Fundamentals p. 4.10, fig. 13).

T =V
where: cf

f / 8 x x

xc f

= conversion factor (2.16 x 10-6)

If T is greater than 100, the flow is rough and the value calculated for fd in Eq. 11 is
representative of the flow. If T is less than 100, the flow is transitional and the value for fd
obtained from Eq. 11 is used as a starting value to solve Eq. 12 iteratively for the friction factor
for the flow. fd is then used in Eq. 8 to obtain the friction loss through the duct section.

Absolute Roughness
Duct material absolute roughness used by the program is shown in Fig. 1-6:
Duct Material
Uncoated Carbon Steel, Clean
Aluminum
Galvanized Steel, Hot Dipped
Stainless Steel
Fibrous Glass Duct, Rigid
Flexible Duct, Metallic
Fibrous Glass Duct Liner

Absolute Roughness, / ft
0.00015
0.0002
0.0005
0.0003
0.0003
0.007
0.015

Fig. 1-6: Duct Material Absolute Roughness


(reproduced with permission from ASHRAE Handbook: 1981
Fundamentals p. 33.5)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Frictional Losses for Noncircular Ducts


All friction loss calculations are based on the equivalent hydraulic diameter.
With equal length of round and rectangular ducts, constant flow in each duct, and equal
resistance to flow in both the round and rectangular ducts, the equivalent round of a rectangular

(a b )0.625
De = 1.30
(a + b )0.250
duct is:
where: De = circular equivalent of a rectangular duct of equal length, fluid resistance and flow
a = length of one side of duct (in.)
b = length of adjacent side of duct (in.)
The mean velocity in a rectangular and oval duct will be less than its circular equivalent.
For oval ducts, the corresponding equations are:

De =

1.55 A0.625
0.25
p

b2
A=
+ b (a - b)
4

P = b + 2 (a - b)
where: p
a
b

= perimeter of oval duct (in.)


= length of major axis (in.)
= length of minor axis (in.)

For both rectangular and oval ducts, the length of the sides is initially determined by the target
aspect ratio. If the resulting dimensions fall outside the minimum and maximum allowable limits
you have set, the dimensions are recalculated without using the target aspect ratio.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Dynamic Losses
Dynamic losses are caused by restrictions and changes in direction to the flow through a piece of
equipment (volume damper, heating coil, etc.) and duct fittings. HVAC Systems Duct Design,
SMACNA, 1985 lists the fittings available for round and rectangular ducts. Since little dynamic
loss data for oval fittings are available, the data for rectangular fittings are used as an
approximation.

Fittings
A duct fitting can occur anywhere along the length of a duct section. The program does not limit
the number of fitting types or multiples thereof per duct section. If a fitting type is not available
in the tables, its dynamic loss has to be entered as a special loss.
All the necessary engineering performance information for fittings is provided in the Ducts
Program. The engineering design effort is to locate the appropriate fitting type in the duct
network system. The duct fitting type and shape type should be compatible. Fittings are
classified as junctions, transitions, and elbows.
Junctions

Junctions are fittings which split the air stream into two or more branches.
Converging junctions join two or more air streams into one and are basically
used in a return/extract duct system. Fittings called take-offs, tees, and wyes
are in this category. Loss coefficients for junctions are functions of the duct
dimensions, air velocities and airflow rates.

Transitions Transitions are fittings which change the duct size or shape without changing
airflow direction or airflow rate. Transitions can be converging or diverging.
Loss coefficients for transitions are functions of upstream and downstream
duct velocities, angle of transition, transition length, and Reynolds number, Re.
Elbows

Elbows are fittings which change the direction of the air stream without
changing the air quantity or velocity. The loss coefficients of elbows are
functions of the elbow radius, duct dimensions, angle of turn, and Reynolds
number, Re.

By definition, a new duct section occurs when there is a change in air quantity, velocity, shape,
duct material or duct insulation. Every duct section, therefore, begins with a junction or
transition type fitting. These fittings are commonly referred to as take-off fittings. There is
always one, and only one, take-off fitting per duct section.

Fitting Losses
Methods of computing the energy losses from the various fitting types are based on information
found in ASHRAE Handbook: 1981 Fundamentals p. 33.28 through 33.50

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

The fluid resistance coefficient represents the ratio of the total pressure loss to the dynamic
pressure at the referenced cross-section O:

Co =

Pt

=
2

c f o

where: cf
Pt
Co
V
Pv,o

Pt
P v,o

= conversion factor (1097)


= total losses of fitting in terms of total pressure (in. of water)
= overall fluid resistance coefficient referenced to section O, dimensionless
= average velocity to which coefficient Co is referenced (ft/min)
= velocity pressure (in. of water)
= fluid density (lbm/cu ft)

For entries, exists, elbows and transitions, the fitting total pressure loss at section is calculated
by:

P t = C o P v,o
where the subscript o is the cross section at which the velocity pressure is referenced.
For converging and diverging flow junctions, the total pressure loss through the main section is
calculated as:

Pt = C c,s P v,c
For total pressure losses through the branch section

P t = C c,b P v,c
where: Cc,s = main local coefficient, dimensionless
Cc,b = branch local coefficient, dimensionless
Pv,c = velocity pressure at the common section, c

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

A tee nomenclature is shown in Fig. 1-7 for converging and diverging flow junction where,

P t (s to c) = C c,s P v,c | P t (c to s) = C c,s P v,c


p t (b to c) = C c,b P v,c | P t (c to b) = C c,b P v,c

(reproduced with permission from ASHRAE Handbook:


1981 Fundamentals, Fig. 6, p. 33.8)

Fan Pressures, Mechanical Energy


For a supply duct system, a circuit is defined as the succeeding sections of ductwork from the fan
discharge up to either a terminal device or a primary damper (for constant-volume, fan-powered
boxes only). For an extract duct system, a circuit is defined as the succeeding section of
ductwork from a terminal device up to a fan.
The number of circuits in a duct system is, by definition, equal to the number terminal devices
and/or constant-volume, fan-powered boxes.
The supply and extract duct systems are run independently; however, the supply system does
need the total pressure losses from the extract system in order to determine the fan total
pressure if a return fan is not specified. Therefore, the extract duct system should be run first,
the total pressure losses of the extract duct system are compared to the loss from the outdoor
intake to the mixing box. The greater of the two is used as miscellaneous duct losses for the
supply system.
n

i=1

j =1

Pt = Pi + P j + Pk
The total pressure losses for each section of a duct system are calculated by Eq. 22:
where: Pt = total pressure loss for section of ductwork (in. of water)
Pi = fitting total pressure loss (in. of water)
n = number of fittings within a section of ductwork
Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

10

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Pj = equipment (damper, coil, etc.) total pressure loss (in. of water)


m = number of pieces of equipment within a section of ductwork
Pk = duct friction loss in terms of total pressure (in. of water)
The total pressure drop through each circuit is calculated by summing the pressure loss through
each section in the circuit.
The fan total pressure requirement for an extract duct system is given by the expressions:

P t = P t + SEF i + SEF o + P f + P d
where: Pt
?
SEFI
SEFo
Pf
Pd

= fan total pressure (in. of water)


= pressure drop through critical circuit, circuit with maximum resistance to flow
(H2O)
= system effect factor due to fan inlet conditions (in. of water)
= system effect factor due to fan outlet conditions (in. of water)
= total pressure loss through fan components such as coils, filters, etc. (H2O)
= total pressure loss through miscellaneous ductwork such as ductwork
downstream of the fan for an extract system, or extract or return ductwork for
a supply system (H2O)

Duct Sizing
The sections of supply duct systems can be sized using one of the following methods:

Pre-sized
equal friction
static regain
total pressure
velocity reduction
constant velocity

Equal friction and constant velocity are the only methods for the design of extract duct systems.
For a draw-through fan, the first section is the one immediately downstream of the fan outlet. If
the supply fan arrangement is blow-through, the first section of the ductwork is the section
immediately downstream of the cooling coil. If the fan has a discharge plenum, the first section
of the ductwork is the one immediately following the plenum. You should identify the first
section and lay out the duct network accordingly.
The static regain, total pressure and velocity reduction sizing methods cannot be used to size
duct sections downstream of terminal boxes. If you select one of these three methods

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

11

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

downstream of a terminal box, the program will automatically default to the equal friction
method.
Flexible ducts are always considered round in shape. They are sized using the velocity you
specify.

Pre-Sized Method
The pre-sized method can be used to calculate pressure losses for a system with pre-calculated
duct dimensions. If you choose this method, the program will check the network for duct
dimensions. Only if all sections are sized will it calculate pressure drops through each section
and determine critical circuits.

Equal Friction Sizing Method


In the equal friction method, the system is sized for a constant pressure loss per unit length of
duct. The equal friction method can be used for the design of supply and extract duct systems.
The program offers two options for this method. The first option, called ASHRAE Limits, allows
the designer to specify high and low limits for pressure loss per unit length and velocity.
For the other option, you can specify the pressure loss per unit length and the maximum and
minimum velocity for the sections of a duct system.
The equal friction sizing method works iteratively between the minimum and maximum velocity
limits to determine a duct size that results in the specified pressure loss per unit length. You can
also request a pressure analysis of the network.

Static Regain Sizing Method


For this method, a section of the duct system is sized so that the increase in static pressure due
to velocity reduction from its upstream section, offsets the friction loss in the section. As in the
other sizing methods, the program starts sizing with the first section. If you have not specified
any overrides for the ducts in that section, it is sized based on the maximum velocity you
specified.
When sizing any other section, the program searches upstream of that section until it finds a
section that also used the static regain sizing method. The velocity at the exit of that section is
used as the upper velocity limit for the section to be sized; the minimum you specified is used as
the lower limit. The program searches iteratively between these limits to calculate a duct size
that results in the required static regain. If the static regain calculated is less than that required
even at minimum velocity, the section is sized using minimum velocity.
If the program encounters a section where all upstream sections are pre-sized, that section is
sized using maximum velocity and the sizing method is applicable starting at that section.
Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

12

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Essentially, the program disregards any sections that have been overridden or that use another
sizing method.
The advantage of this method is that all sections have approximately the same entering static
pressure, thereby simplifying outlet selection. One disadvantage might be seen in networks with
a large pressure drop in a section near the fan outlet. The velocity could be reduced to the
minimum within a few sections in such a way that all the ductwork downstream would be sized
using minimum velocity. Another disadvantage could stem from specifying a very low minimum
velocity. Ducts would then tend to be very large at the end of long branch runs. The sizing
method does not account for the total mechanical energy supplied to the air by the fan.

Total Pressure Sizing Method


The total pressure sizing method is a variation of the static regain method. The total pressure of
any point in the ductwork represents the actual energy of the moving air at that point.
The program will search for the first section that does not have override dimensions. This
section is sized at the maximum velocity you have specified. When sizing any other section, the
program searches upstream until it finds a section that also used the total pressure sizing
method. The total pressure leaving that section is considered equal to the total pressure
entering the section to be sized. The program then uses binary convergence, starting with the
minimum velocity, until it finds a duct size that matches the required entering total pressure. All
presized duct sections are disregarded when applying the total pressure sizing method to the
sections to be sized.
The advantage of this method is that it accounts for all mechanical energy losses in a system.
The system design does not have to be dependent on an assumed velocity at the fan outlet.

Velocity Reduction Sizing Method


This method sizes the first section for the maximum velocity that you specified and designs the
downstream sections at progressively lower velocities using the reduction percentage you also
specified. The velocity cannot fall below the minimum that you specified.
If the section immediately above the section to be sized is a presized section, the program
searches upstream until it finds a section that also used the velocity reduction sizing method and
treats it as the upstream section for the section to be sized.

Constant Velocity Sizing Method


The constant velocity method is a design in which every section of a duct system is sized based
on the design velocity you specified. This design velocity may be overridden for any section of
the system. Maximum and minimum velocity limits are not applicable in this method. Flexible

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

13

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

ducts are also sized based on a design velocity you specified. The constant velocity method can
be used for the design of supply and extract duct systems.

Circuit Analysis and System Balancing


The series of duct sections starting from the primary fan/air handling unit section to the duct
section with an opening is defined as a circuit. The number of duct circuits in a duct system is, by
definition, equal to the number of supply and exhaust openings (registers, grilles or diffusers).
Circuit pressure analysis consists of the following steps:

Add the pressure losses in each section of the circuit to obtain the circuit pressure loss.
Determine the highest circuit pressure loss.
Set the entering total pressure of the first section in the circuit as the sum of the highest
circuit pressure loss and the velocity pressure in the section.
Analyze each section in the circuit starting with the first section and moving through each
section in the fluid flow sequence.
The entering section total pressure is the leaving section total pressure of the upstream
section.
The leaving section total pressure is the entering section total pressure less the section
pressure loss.
The entering and leaving section static pressures are obtained by deducting the velocity
pressure at these nodes.
Calculate the balancing required in each circuit. This is equal to the highest circuit total
pressure loss minus the given circuit total pressure loss.

In the case of primary-secondary systems, the primary circuit ends at the fan-powered box or the
terminal device if there is no box in the circuit.
Secondary systems are analyzed independently as separate systems. The entering pressure of
the first section in the secondary system is the pressure loss of the secondary circuit with the
highest pressure loss.
The objective of system balancing is to maintain the same pressure loss in all circuits. Dampers
at the end of each circuit will still be required, but are used to make the fine tuning adjustment
to maintain the right air quantity at each opening.
Using the specified sizing method, the Ducts Program makes the preliminary analysis and
calculates sizes for all sections of the duct system. It next determines the circuit with the highest
pressure loss. This circuit is commonly referred as the longest hydraulic run. All other circuits
will have to be dampered. The amount of dampering is directly related to the difference
between the pressure loss of the given circuit and the highest pressure loss of the system.
The system balancing process involves a series of iterations to increase the pressure losses of all
circuits to that of the circuit with the highest pressure loss. The process starts with the circuit
Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

14

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

with the next highest pressure loss and continues in descending order of circuit pressure loss.
Duct sections in the circuit and that are not common to the previously analyzed circuits are
iteratively reduced in size until the circuit pressure loss is equal to the loss in the longest run.
There are limits to the process of reducing sizes. The iteration stops when the pressure loss,
velocity and noise levels in the duct section reaches the maximum limits of the design criteria. In
this case, the circuit still remains unbalanced and requires dampering. Output reports indicate
the amount of dampering required by each circuit.

Thermal Analysis
After the duct network has been sized, the system can be analyzed to calculate heat gains or
losses in the network.
The thermal analysis option is available only for systems that satisfy the following criteria:
There are no terminal boxes in the network with reheat coils.
All rooms are in either the heating or cooling mode.
There are no secondary heating coils in the system.
The program begins the thermal analysis with the first section in the ductwork. The temperature
of air entering the first section is the same as the coil leaving temperature for a blow-through
system. For a draw-through system, the temperature of air entering the first section is adjusted
for heat gain across the fan. For a motor that is inside the airstream, the heat gain is given by

qm =

HPm x LF x cf
/100

For a motor that is outside the airstream, the heat gain is

qm = HPm x LF x cf
where: qm = heat gain from electric motor (Btu/hr)
HPm = horsepower rating for the motor
= full load motor efficiency (%)
LF = load factor, i.e. a fraction of rated load delivered
cf = conversion factor (745.7)
The horsepower rating and full load efficiency are obtained from Fig. 1-8.
The temperature rise across the fan is then calculated using the following equation:

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

15

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

T f =
where: Tf
qm
Q
cf1

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

qm
Q xc f1x
= temperature rise across the fan (F)
= heat gain from electric motor (Btu/hr)
= air flow quantity (cu ft/min)
= conversion factor (14.4)
= air density (lbm/cu ft)

Rated
Motor HP
0.16
0.25
0.33
0.50
0.75
1
2
3
5
7.5
10
15

Full Load
Efficiency %
35
54
56
60
72
77
79
81
82
84
85
86

Rated
Motor HP
20
25
30
40
50
60
75
100
125
150
200
250

Full Load
Efficiency %
87
88
89
89
89
89
90
90
90
91
91
91

Fig. 1-8: Heat Gains from Typical Electric Motors


(reproduced with permission from ASHRAE Handbook: 1981 Fundamentals p. 26.26, Table 24)
Once the temperature of air entering the first section is determined, the individual sections can
be analyzed for heat gains or losses. The program calculates heat gains or losses using the
following expressions:

qe =

UPL t e + t i

- ta
cf 2

te =

t i ( y + 1) - 2 t a
( y - 1)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

16

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

ti =

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

t e ( y - 1) 2 t a
( y + 1)

where: Y
y
qe
U
P
A
D
L

and
te
ti
ta
cf
cf1
cf2

= cf1 AV /UPL for rectangular and oval ducts


= cf2 DV /UL for round ducts
= heat loss/gain through duct walls (Btu/hr) (Negative for heat gain)
= overall coefficient of heat transfer of duct walls (Btu/sq ft. F)
= perimeter of duct (in.)
= cross-sectional area of duct (sq in.)
= duct diameter (in.)
= duct length (ft)
= density (lbm/cu ft)
= temperature of air entering duct (F)
= temperature of air leaving duct (F)
= temperature of air surrounding duct, (F)
= conversion factor (12)
= conversion factor (2.4)
= conversion factor (0.6)

The U-values used in the program for sheet metal, lined and insulated ducts are shown in Fig 1-9.

(reproduced with permission from ASHRAE Handbook: 1981 Fundamentals, p. 33.10, Fig. 8)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

17

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Reanalysis Options
The program provides two ways to reanalyze heat gains and losses. You can choose to
Recalculate air flow quantities at each terminal device
Adjust the coil leaving temperature
Option One
The first option is to recalculate air flow quantities required at each terminal device in order to
satisfy the design cooling or heating loads in each room. This is done by comparing the actual
supply air temperature to the design supply air temperature that you can specify for each room.
The following expression is used to recalculate the air flow quantities:

Q 2 = Q1
where: Q1
Q2
Tr
Ts
To

Tr -Ts
Tr -To

= design supply air quantity (cu ft/min)


= recalculated supply air quantity (cu ft/min)
= design room dry-bulb temperature (F)
= design supply air temperature at terminal device (F)
= actual supply air temperature at terminal device (F)

Once the supply air quantities are adjusted, the program then resizes the ductwork and has the
option of performing pressure, acoustic and thermal analyses for the new network.
Option Two
The second option is to recalculate the coil leaving temperature by an amount equal to the
temperature difference in the circuit with the maximum temperature rise or drop.
For a network that has net heat gain across the sections, the coil leaving temperature is lowered
so that the design supply air temperature can be maintained at the terminal device for the circuit
with the maximum temperature rise. For a network that has net heat loss across the sections,
the coil leaving temperature is increased so that design supply air temperature can be
maintained at the terminal device for the circuit with the maximum temperature drop.
The next step is to recalculate supply air quantities for all other terminal devices in order to
satisfy design cooling or heating loads for each room.
Once the required air quantities are recalculated, the program then resizes the network and has
the option of performing pressure, acoustic and thermal analyses for the network.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

18

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Acoustic Analysis and System Noise Attenuation


The program determines the amount of required attenuation on the inlet and discharge sides of
the fan(s), or in the main ductwork and branches as described below.
For each circuit, the program determines the resultant attenuation provided by the following
items:
1. In straight, line and unlined duct
2. In lined and unlined elbows
3. Fan discharge plenum (supply ductwork only)
4. Branch takeoffs
5. Duct and reflection loss
6. Room effect
The resultant sound power level per terminal device (inlet or outlet) is the difference between
the attenuation of the ductwork system and room effect (items 1 through 6) and the fangenerated sound power level for all eight octave bands. The difference between this resultant
sound power level per diffuser and the sound pressure levels that correspond with the specified
room criterion (NC level) represents the attenuation required on the inlet and discharge sides of
the fan(s), or in the main ductwork and branches.
Fig. 1-10 summarizes the system noise procedure described for each circuit.
Line

Item

Fan Lw re 10-2 watts

Attenuation of duct system

Branch take-offs and room effect attenuation

Total system attenuation, line 2 + line 3

Sound Power level per terminal device

6
7

Room criterion (NC level), line 1 - line 4


Required attenuation, line 5 - line 6

Fig. 1-10:

Summary Table

On determining the resultant sound power level for each circuit, the program does not take into
account the following items:
attenuation through terminal boxes
terminal box discharge sound power level
regenerated noise at fitting
attenuation in fittings other than elbows and branch takeoffs

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

19

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Fan Noise
The sound power generation of a given fan obtained from the fan manufacturer may be entered
using the fan sound power levels input form. However, if the data are not available, the program
can estimate the octave band sound power levels for various fans using the following expression:

L w = K w + 10 log
where: Lw
Kw
Q
Q1
P
P1
C

Q
P
+ 20 + log
+C
Q1
P1

= estimated sound power level of fan (dB re 1pW)


= specific sound power level from table
= flow rate (cu ft/min)
= 1 when flow is in sq ft/min
= Fan static pressure (in. of water)
= 1 when pressure is in in. of water
= correction factor in dB, for point of operation

The values of the estimated sound power level Lw are calculated for all eight bands using Eq. 30,
and the BFI (see Fig. 1-11) is added to the octave band in which the blade passage frequency
falls. Fig. 1-12 is used to determine the octave band in which blade frequency increment (BFI)
occurs for the various types of fans.

63

Fan Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

>= 36 in.

32

32

31

29

28

23

15

10

< 36 in.
All
> 40 in.
40 in.-20 in.
20 in.
>= 40 in.
40 in.
>= 40 in.
40 in.

36
47
45
55
63
39
37
41
40

38
43
39
48
57
36
39
39
41

36
39
42
48
58
38
43
43
47

34
33
39
45
50
39
43
41
46

33
28
37
45
44
37
43
39
44

38
25
32
40
39
34
41
37
43

20
23
30
38
38
32
38
34
37

15
20
29
36
37
30
35
31
32

All

48

51

58

55

52

46

40

Fan Type
Centrifugal Airfoil
backward curved,
Backward inclined
Forward, curved
Radial blade,
Pressure blower
Vaneaxial
Tubeaxial
Propeller
Cooling tower

BFI
3
2
8
6
5

Fig. 1-11:
Sound Power Levels
Specific sound power levels for inlets or outlets.
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.7, p. 11.14)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

20

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Fan Type

Octave Band

Centrifugal
Airfoil, backward curved, backward
inclined
Forward curved
Radial blade, pressure blower

250 Hz

Vaneaxial

125 Hz

Tubeaxial

63 Hz

Cooling Tower Propeller

63 Hz

500 Hz
125 Hz

Fig. 1-12: Octave Band


Octave band in which blade frequency increment occurs.
(reproduced with permission from 1987 ASHRAE Handbook, Table 4, p. 52.7)

Point of Operation
The specific sound power levels given in Fig. 1-11 are for fans operating at or near the peak
efficiency point of the fan performance curve. If a fan is not operating at or above 90% of peak
static efficiency, a correction factor, C (see Eq. 30), is added to the specific sound power levels
given in Fig. 1-13 for all eight octave bands. Fig. 1-12 gives the correction factor C as a function
of percent of peak static efficiency.
Static Efficiency
% of Peak

Correction Factor
dB

90 to 100

85 to 89

75 to 84

65 to 74

55 to 64

12

50 to 54

15

Fig. 1-13: Correction Factor C


Correction factor, C, for off-peak operation (reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems
Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.8, p. 11.15)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

21

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Fans In Parallel
The program can accept up to ten fans in parallel. These fans must be of the same type and
produce the same static pressure and flow rate. The resultant sound power levels of two or
more fans in parallels for all octave bands are obtained from Fig. 1-14.

Difference
between sound
levels in dB

No. of dB to be
added to higher
level

3.0

2.6

2.1

1.8

1.5

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

10

0.4

12
14

0.3
0.2

Fig. 1-14: Combining Decibels


(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.1, p. 11.2)
Example:

Find the resultant sound power levels of three fans in parallel having an estimated
sound power level equal to 90 dB at the 125 octave band using Fig. 1-14.

Solution:
1. 90 dB - 90 dB = 0 dB from Fig. 1-14, 3 dB is added to the higher level 90 dB. The
resultant sound power level for 2 fans in parallel is 90 + 3 = 93 dB.
2. 93 dB - 90 dB = 3 dB from Fig. 1-14, 1.8 dB is added to the higher level 93 dB. The
resultant sound power level for 3 fans in parallel is 93 + 1.8 = 94.8 dB.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

22

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Fan Discharge Air Plenum


The sound attenuation provided by a plenum on the fan discharge shown in Fig. 1-15 is

A = 10 log
where:
Se
Sw
dr

1 cos 1 -
+

2
S e 2 d S w

= absorption coefficient of lining, dimensionless


= plenum exit area (sq ft)
= plenum wall area (sq ft)
= distance between entrance and exit (ft)
= angle of incident at exit, degrees

Attenuation of the Duct System


The program calculates the natural attenuation of unlined rectangular and round duct sections of
the duct system using Fig. 1-16 and Fig. 1-17. These tables give the natural attenuation for linear
length as a function of the duct dimension for all the eight octave bands.
Fig. 1-16 is also used for oval ducts. The program uses the smallest duct dimensions for
rectangular and oval ducts. The attenuation values given in Fig. 1-16 and Fig. 1-17 are doubled if
the unlined duct section has an external insulation.
The program calculates the natural attenuation of lined rectangular and round duct sections and
elbows using Fig. 1-18 through Fig. 1-21. These tables give the attenuation as a function of duct
dimension and lining thickness for all eight octave bands.
Fig. 1-18 and Fig. 1-19 are also used for oval ducts. The program uses the smallest duct
dimension for rectangular and oval ducts. The attenuation values given in Fig. 1-18 through Fig.
1-21 are used for duct sections of only a maximum of 15 linear feet of lined duct, lined duct
sections of over 15 linear feet are considered as unlined duct.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

23

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Attenuation
Of Unlined
Rectangular
Duct dB/ft

Smallest Duct
Dimension
3"-12"
13"-18"
19"-24"
25"-36"
37"-48"
49"-72"
73"-96"+

63
.10
.15
.18
.20
.20
.20
.20

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


125
250
500 1000 2000 4000
.10
.05
.05
.04
.04
.04
.10
.05
.05
.04
0.4
0.4
.12
.06
.05
.04
0.4
0.4
.14
.06
.05
.04
0.4
0.4
.14
.06
.05
.04
.04
.04
.15
.06
.05
.04
.04
.04
.16
.07
.05
.04
0.4
0.4

8000
.04
0.4
0.4
0.4
.04
.04
0.4

Fig. 1-16:
Attenuation, Unlined Rectangular and Oval Ducts
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10A, p. 11.16)

Attenuation
Of Unlined
Round
Duct dB/ft

Smallest Duct
Dimension
3"-5"
6"-12"
13"-18"
19"-24"
25"-36"
37"-48"
49"-72"
73"-96"+

63
.03
.03
.02
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


125
250
500 1000 2000 4000
.03
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.03
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
0
0
0
.02
.01
.01
0
0
0
.02
.01
.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.01
0
0
0
0
0
.01
0
0
0
0
0

8000
.01
.01
0
0
0
0
0
0

Fig. 1-17:
Attenuation, Unlined Round Ducts
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10B, p. 11.16)
Smallest Duct
Dimension
Attenuation
3"-5"
Of Unlined
6"-12"
Rectangular
13"-18"
Duct dB/ft with
19"-24"
1 lining
25"-36"
37"-48"
49"-72"
73"-96"+

63
.3
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


125
250
500 1000 2000 4000
.6
1.0
2.1
5.0
10.5
5.0
.4
.9
1.9
4.3
7.5
2.0
.3
.6
1.5
3.7
3.0
1.0
.2
.5
1.4
3.5
1.8
.8
.2
.4
1.0
1.8
1.2
.6
.2
.3
.9
1.5
1.0
.4
.2
.25
.8
1.0
.8
.3
.2
.25
.7
.8
.7
.2

8000
4.0
2.0
1.0
.8
.6
.4
.3
.2

Fig. 1-18:
Rectangular Duct, 1 Inch Lining
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10E, p. 11.17)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

24

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Attenuation
Of Unlined
Rectangular
Duct dB/ft
with 1/2
lining

Smallest Duct
Dimension
3"-5"
6"-12"
13"-18"
19"-24"
25"-36"
37"-48"
49"-72"
73"-96"+

63
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


125
250
500 1000 2000 4000
.4
.7
1.3
2.5
5.0
5.0
.3
.6
1.1
2.2
4.5
2.0
.25
.5
1.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
.2
.4
.8
1.6
1.4
.8
.2
.3
.6
1.2
1.0
.6
.2
.2
.4
.8
.8
.3
.2
.2
.3
.5
.5
.3
.2
.2
.2
.4
.4
.2

8000
4.0
2.0
1.0
.8
.6
.3
.3
.2

Fig. 1-19:
Rectangular Duct, 1/2 Inch Lining
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10F, p. 11.17)

Attenuation
Of Unlined
Round
Duct dB/ft
with 1
lining

Smallest Duct
Dimension
6"-12"
13"-18"
19"-24"
25"-36"
37"-48"
49"-72"
73"-96"+

63
.3
.2
.1
.07
.04
.02
.01

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


125
250
500 1000 2000 4000
1.0
1.5
1.5
3.7
4.8
2.8
.7
1.0
1.2
2.7
2.8
1.5
.5
.6
1.0
1.7
.9
.5
.2
.4
.8
1.0
.7
.5
.08
.3
.6
.6
.5
.5
.04
.2
.5
.5
.4
.4
.02
.1
.4
.4
.3
.3

8000
2.2
1.3
.5
.5
.5
.4
.3

Fig. 1-20:
Round Duct, 1 Inch Lining
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10G, p. 11.17)

Attenuation
Of Unlined
Round
Duct dB/ft
with 2
lining

Smallest Duct
Dimension
6"-12"
13"-18"
19"-24"
25"-36"
37"-48"
49"-72"
73"-96"+

63
.5
.4
.3
.2
.12
.08
.06

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


125
250
500 1000 2000 4000
1.2
1.7
2.3
3.9
5.0
3.0
1.0
1.2
2.2
3.0
3.0
1.7
.8
.9
2.1
2.0
1.0
.8
.3
.7
1.5
1.5
.8
.6
.2
.5
1.0
1.0
.7
.6
.1
.3
.7
.7
.5
.5
.08
.2
.6
.6
.4
.4

8000
2.3
1.5
.7
.6
.6
.5
.4

Fig. 1-21:
Round Duct, 2 Inch Lining
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10H, p. 11.17)
The attenuation of unlined rectangular and round elbows is given in Fig. 1-22. The program
doubles the attenuation values given in this table if the unlined elbow has external insulation.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

25

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Smallest Duct
Dimension
To 4"
5"-10"
11"-20"
21"-40"
41"-80"+

63
0
0
0
0
0

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


125
250
500 1000 2000 4000
0
0
0
0
1.0
2.0
0
0
0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0
0
1.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
0
1.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0

8000
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0

Attenuation
Of Unlined
Elbows
Rectangula
Duct dB/ft
Fig. 1-16:
Unlined Rectangular and Round Elbows
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10C, p. 11.16)
The attenuation of lined rectangular and round elbows is given in Fig. 1-23.
Octave Band Center Frequency Hz
Smallest Duct
Dimension
63
125
250
500 1000 2000 4000 8000
Attenuation
To 4"
0
0
0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
6.0
Of lined Elbows
5"-10"
0
0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
Round &
11"-20"
0
1.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Rectangular
21"-40"
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
41"-80"+
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
Duct dB/ft
Fig. 1-23:
Lined Rectangular and Round Elbows
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10D, p. 11.16)

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


63
Branch
Duct
Attenuation

125

250

500

1000

2000

4000

8000

0.2%

27

27

27

27

27

27

27

27

0.5%
1.0%
2.0%
5.0%
10.0%
20.0%
50.0%

23
20
17
13
10
7
3

23
20
17
13
10
7
3

23
20
17
13
10
7
3

23
20
17
13
10
7
3

23
20
17
13
10
7
3

23
20
17
13
10
7
3

23
20
17
13
10
7
3

23
20
17
13
10
7
3

First Critical Room CFM


=%
System CFM

Fig. 1-24:
Branch Takeoff Attenuation
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.11A, p. 11.18)
Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

26

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

The program calculates the attention of branch takeoffs using Fig. 1-24. This table gives the
branch duct attenuation as a function of the percentage of the room to the system air flow
quantities for all eight octave bands.
The program computes the attenuation available through end reflection loss using Fig. 1-25.
Smallest
Duct
Dimensions

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


63

125

250

500

1000 2000 4000 8000

To 5"

17

12

6"-8"

14

10

9"-12"

12

13"-16"

10

Reflection

17"-22"

Loss

23"-30"

31"-40"

41"-60"+

Duct
Diameter
End

Fig. 1-25:
Duct End Reflection Loss
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10B, p. 11.18)

Room
Effect
(for
average
rooms)

Room
Volume

Ceiling
Height

1000
2000
5000
10000
10000
20000
20000
30000
30000
40000+
40000+
40000+

8'
8'
8'-12"
8'-10"
11'-14"
8'-12"
13'-15"
8'-11"
12'-15"
8'-14"
15'-17"
18'-22"

Octave Band Center Frequency Hz


63
2
2
5
7
8
8
9
11
12
10
11
12

125
3
6
8
9
9
10
12
13
11
12
13

250

500

2
3
6
8
9
9
10
12
13
11
12
13

4
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
12
13
14

1000 2000 4000 8000


2
4
7
9
10
10
11
13
14
12
13
14

5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
13
14
15

2
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
13
14
15

6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
14
15
16

Fig. 1-26:
Room Effect Attenuation
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10C, p. 11.18)
The program calculates the room effect attenuation using Fig. 1-26. This table gives the
attenuation for room with suspended ceilings as a function of the ceiling height and room
volume for all eight octave bands.
Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

27

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Room Criteria
Fig. 1-27 gives the sound pressure levels for all eight octave bands that correspond with a
specified NC level for the room.
Octave Band Center Frequency Hz
NC-30
NC-35
NC-40
NC-45
NC-50

NC
Noise
Criterion
Levels

63
57
60
64
67
71

125
48
53
57
60
64

250
35
46
51
54
59

500 1000 2000 4000 8000


31
29
28
28
27
40
36
34
33
32
45
41
39
38
37
49
46
44
43
42
54
54
49
48
47

Fig. 1-27:
Sound Pressure Levels
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.11D, p. 11.18)

Material Estimation
Classification of Ducts
This feature of the program allows you to select a gage or thickness and reinforcement required
for the ducts once they have been sized.
Operating pressures for each section of ductwork are calculated earlier during the pressure
analysis. Fig. 1-28 gives the pressure class for each section and corresponding operating
pressure. Once the operating pressures are determined, the sections are analyzed based on the
specified shape, rectangular/oval or round.
Static Pressure
Pressure Class
0.5 in. of water
1 in. of water
2 in. of water
3 in. of water
4 in. of water
6 in. of water
10 in. of water

Operating Pressure
up to 0.5 in. of water
over 0.5 in. of water to 1 in. of water
over 1 in. of water to 2 in. of water
over 2 in. of water to 3 in. of water
over 3 in. of water to 4 in. of water
over 4 in. of water to 6 in. of water
over 6 in. of water to 10 in. of water

Fig. 1-28
Operating Pressures
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, p. 106)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

28

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Duct Materials
The thickness and weight of sheet-metal sheets available in the program are given in Fig. 1-29
through Fig. 1-32 reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Appendix 1 through 4. The program uses the nominal thicknesses from the tables. Minimum
and maximum thicknesses are shown for your information only.
Thickness in Inches
Gage

Min
30
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
12
11

Max

.0105
.0136
.0142
.0158
.0189
.0220
.0241
.0273
.0304
.0335
.0388
.0450
.0513
.0565
.0643
.0711
.0100
.1150

.0145
.0176
.0202
.0218
.0249
.0280
.0321
.0353
.0384
.0415
.0488
.0550
.0613
.0685
.0763
.0851
.1184
.1350

Nom
.0125
.0156
.0172
.0188
.0219
.0250
.0281
.0313
.0344
.0375
.0438
.0500
.0563
.0625
.0703
.0781
.1094
.1250

Weight
Lb/ft2
.525
.656
.722
.788
.919
1.050
1.181
1.313
1.444
1.575
1.838
2.100
2.363
2.625
2.953
3.281
4.594
5.250

Fig. 1-29:
Stainless Steel
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Appendix 1)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

29

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

M.S. Gage

Weight lb/ft2

28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12

.625
.750
1.000
1.250
1.500
2.000
2.500
3.125
4.375

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Nominal
.0149 in
.0179 in
.0239 in
.0299 in
.0359 in
.0478 in
.0598 in
.0747 in
.1046 in

Thickness
Cold Rolled
Min
Max
.0129 in
.0169 in
.0159 in
.0199 in
.0209 in
.0269 in
.0269 in
.0329 in
.0329 in
.0389 in
.0438 in
.0518 in
.0548 in
.0648 in
.0697 in
.0797 in
.0986 in
.1106 in

Fig. 1-30:
Standard Gage Uncoated Steel
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Appendix 2)

Nom.

Thickness in Inches
Min.

Max.

Weight
lb/ft2

.016
.020
.024
.025
.032
.040
.050
.063
.080
.090
.100
.125

.014
.0175
.0215
.0225
.0295
.037
.046
.059
.076
.086
.095
.12

.018
.0225
.0265
.0275
.0345
.043
.054
.067
.084
.094
.105
.13

.228
.285
.342
.356
.456
.570
.713
.898
1.140
1.283
1.426
1.782

Fig. 1-31:
Aluminum Alloy 3003-H14
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Appendix 3

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

30

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Gage
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Min

Thickness in Inches
Max

Nom

Weight
Nom lb/ft2

.0127
.0157
.0187
.0236
.0296
.0356
.0466
.0575
.0705

.0187
.0217
.0247
.0316
.0376
.0436
.0566
.0695
.0865

.0157
.0187
.0217
.0276
.0336
.0396
.0516
.0635
.0785

.656
.781
.906
1.156
1.406
1.656
2.156
2.656
3.281

Fig. 1-32:
Galvanized Tolerances
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Appendix 4)

Rectangular Metal Duct Construction


Duct construction requirements are listed in Fig. 1-33 through Fig. 1-39, reproduced with
permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Tables 1-3 through 1-9, pp. 1-16 1-22. The program uses these tables to determine the gage and reinforcement required for the
material used in a rectangular or oval duct section.
Since the greater dimension of a rectangular duct is more likely to deform, that dimension is
assumed to be critical. A gage, reinforcement spacing and tie rod requirement corresponding to
the working pressure in the duct is chosen from the table. The smaller dimension is analyzed
using the gage and reinforcement chosen for the greater dimension.
You can use the override forms to specify the reinforcement spacing. If you specify an override,
the program will check the table and determine the gage and reinforcement rigidity class for that
spacing. If there is no gage for that spacing, your override will be ignored. The program will
proceed to choose the appropriate gage, reinforcement spacing and tie rod requirement.
As Fig. 1-33 through Fig. 1-39 are based on galvanized steel, the program will first find the duct
construction requirements for that material then find the equivalent construction requirements
for other materials. For aluminum ducts, the thickness is determined from Fig. 1-40 while Fig. 141 is used to determine the reinforcement.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

31

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Duct
Duct
Gauge (No
Dimension
Reinforce(in.)
ment)
10 dn.

12

14

16

18
26 ga.
20
24 ga.
22
22 ga.
24
22 ga.
26
20 ga.
28
18 ga.
30
18 ga.
36
16 ga.
42
48
54
60
72
84
96
97 UP

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Guage Duct


Re-inforcement Spacing
10

2-1/2

A-26
A-26
A-26
A-26
B-24
B-24
C-22
D-20
E-20
E-18
F-18
H-16
F+rod

B-26
B-26
C-24
D-24
D-22
E-20
F-20
G-18
F+rod
H-16
F+rod
I-16
F+rod

C-26
D-26
D-26
D-26
E-24

C-26

E-26

F-22

F-24

H-22
+rod
H-20
F+rod
H-18

G-24
F+rod
H-22
F+rod

Fig. 1-33:
1/2-inch W.G.
Rectangular duct reinforcement for 1/2" of water, positive and negative static pressure

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

32

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Duct
Duct
Gauge (No
Dimension
Reinforce(in.)
ment)
10 dn.

12
26 ga.
14
24 ga.
16
22 ga.
18
22 ga.
20
20 ga.
22
18 ga.
24
18 ga.
26
18 ga.
28
16 ga.
30
16 ga.
36
42
48
54
60
72
84
96

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Guage Duct


Re-inforcement Spacing
10

2-1/2

A-26
A-24
A-24
A-24
A-24
B-24
B-22
C-22
C-22
D-20
E-18
F-16
G-16
F+rod

A-26
A-26
A-26

B-24
C-24
C-24
D-22
D-20
E-18

A-26
A-26
A-26
B-26
B-26
C-26
D-24
E-24

D-26
D-26

F-18

E-22

E-24

G-18
F+rod

F-22

F-24

H-18
F+rod
I-18
F+rod
J-16
F+rod

G-22
F+rod
H-20
F+rod
I-18
F+rod

G-24
F+rod

I-20
F+rod

97 UP
Fig. 1-34:

H-22
F+rod
I-22
F+rod

H-18t
1-inch W.G.

Rectangular duct reinforcement for 1" of water, positive and negative static pressure
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Table 1-4, p. 1-17)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

33

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Duct
Dimension
(in.)

Duct Gauge
(No Reinforcement)

10 dn.
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
36
42
48

26 ga.
24 ga.
22 ga.
20 ga.
20 ga.
18 ga.
16 ga.
16 ga.

54

NOT

60

ALLOWED

72
84
96
97 UP

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct


Reinforcement Spacing
210'
8'
5'
4'
3'
1/2'
A-26
A-24
A-26
A-22
A-24
A-26
A-22
A-24
A-26
B-20
B-22
A-26
B-20
B-22
A-26
C-20
C-22
B-26
C-20
C-22
B-26
C-18
C-20
C-24
B-26
D-18
D-20
C-24
C-26
E-16
E-18
D-22
D-24
E-16
E-22
E-24
G-16
F-20
E-22
E-24
G-18
F-20
F-24
F+rod
H-18
G-20
G-22
G-24
F+rod F+rod
F+rod F+rod
I-16
H-18
H-22
F+rod F+rod
F+rod
J-18
I-20
F+rod
F+rod
K-16
K-18
J-26
G+rod
G+rod F+rod
H-18t

2'
H-24
F+rod
I-22
F+rod
-

Fig. 1-35:
2-inch W.G.
Rectangular duct reinforcement for 2" of water, positive and negative static pressure
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 1-5, p. 1-18)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

34

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Duct
Dimension,
in.
10 dn.

No
Reinforcement Duct
Gauge

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct


Reinforcement Spacing
10'

8'

5'

4'

3'

2'

2'

24

12

22

A-24

A-24

14

20

A-22

A-24

16

18

A-22

A-24

18

18

A-22

A-24

20

16

B-18

B-20

A-24

22

16

C-18

B-20

B-24

24

16

C-18

C-18

B-24

26

D-18

D-18

C-24

28

D-18

D-18

C-22

C-24

30

D-16

D-18

C-22

C-24

E-16

E-20

D-24

42

E-20

E-22

E-24

48

G-18

F-20

E-22

E-24

54

H-18
F+rod
H-16
F+rod

H-18
F+rod
H-18
F+rod
I-16
F+rod

G-22
F+rod
G-20
F+rod
H-20
F+rod
J-18
F+rod
L-16
G+rod

E-24

G-24
F+rod
H-22
F+rod
I-20
F+rod
K-18
G+rod
H-18t

36

60
72
84
96
NOT
97 UP

H-24
F+rod
I-22
F+rod
J-20
G+rod
H-18t

Fig. 1-36:
3-inch W.G.
Rectangular duct reinforcement for 3" of water, positive and negative static pressure
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 1-6, p. 1-19)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

35

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

8 dn.
10

No
Reinforce
-ment
Duct
Gauge
24 ga.
22 ga.

12

20 ga.

A-22

14

18 ga.

16
18

Duct
Dimension,
in.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct


Reinforcement Spacing
10'

8'

5'

4'

3'

2'

2'

A-24

A-22

A-24

A-20

A-22

A-24

18 ga.

A-20

A-20

A-24

16 ga.

B-18

B-20

A-24

20

C-18

C-20

B-24

22

C-18

C-18

B-24

24

D-18

D-18

C-22

C-24

26

D-18

D-18

C-22

C-24

28

E-18

E-18

D-22

D-24

30

E-18

E-18

D-22

D-24

36

E-20

E-22

D-24

42

F-18

F-20

E-22

E-24

48

G-18

G-18

F-22

F-22

E-24

54

H-16
F+rod
I-16
F+rod

H-18
F+rod
I-16
F+rod

G-20
F+rod
H-20
F+rod

G-22
F+rod
H-22
F+rod

F-24

I-18
F+rod
K-16
G+rod

I-20
F+rod
J-18
F+rod
L-16
G+rod
H-18t

60
NOT
ALLOWED

72
84
96
97 UP

-24
F+rod
H-22
F+rod
J-20
F+rod
K-20
G+rod
H-18t

Fig. 1-37:
4-inch W.G.
Rectangular duct reinforcement for 4" of water, positive static pressure
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 1-7, p. 1-20)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

36

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Duct
Dimension
, in.

No
Reinforcement Duct
Gauge

8 dn.
10

24
20

12

18

A-20

14

18

16

16

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct


Reinforcement Spacing
10'

8'

5'

4'

3'

2'

2'

A-24

A-20

A-24

A-20

A-20

A-22

A-24

B-18

B-18

A-22

A-24

18

C-18

C-18

B-22

B-24

20

C-16

C-18

B-22

B-24

22

D-16

C-18

C-22

C-24

24

D-18

C-22

C-22

C-24

26

D-16

D-20

C-22

C-24

28

E-16

D-20

D-22

C-24

30

D-18

D-22

D-24

36

F-18

E-20

E-22

E-24

42

G-16

G-18

F-20

E-22

48

H-18

H-18

G-22

54

H-16
F+rod

H-18
F+rod
H-18
F+rod
J-16
F+rod

H-20
F+rod
H-20
F+rod
J-18
F+rod
L-16
G+rod

G-22
F+rod
H-22
F+rod
I-20
F+rod
K-18
G+rod
L-16
G+rod
H-18t

60
72
84

NOT

96
97 UP

ALLOWED

Fig. 1-38:
6-inch W.G.
Rectangular duct reinforcement for 6" of water, positive static pressure
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 1-8, p. 1-21)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

37

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Duct
Dimension,
in.

No
Reinforcement Duct
Gauge

8 dn.
10

22
18

12

16

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct


Reinforcement Spacing
5'
A-24
A-22

A-24

A-18

A-22

A-24

14

B-18

A-20

A-22

A-24

16

B-16

B-20

B-22

B-24

18

C-16

C-20

B-22

B-24

20

D-16

C-18

C-20

B-24

22

C-18

C-20

C-24

24

D-18

D-20

C-24

26

D-18

D-20

D-22

C-24

28

E-18

D-20

D-22

C-24

30

E-16

E-18

D-22

D-24

36

F-16

F-18

F-20

E-22

E-24

H-16

G-18

G-20

F-22

NOT

H-18

H-18

G-22

ALLOWED

I-16
F+rod
J-16
F+rod

H-18
F+rod
I-18
F+rod
K-16
F+rod

84

H-20
F+rod
I-20
F+rod
K-18
F+rod
H-16

96

H-16t

97 UP

H-16t

42
48

10'

8'

4'

54
60
72

3'

2'

2'

Fig. 1-39:
10-inch W.G.
Rectangular duct reinforcement for 10" of water, positive static pressure
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 1-9, p. 1-22)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

38

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Galvanized Steel

Commercial Size (in.)

28
26

.025
.032

24

.040

22

.050

20

.063

10

0.080

16

.090

Fig. 1-40:
Aluminum Commercial Sizes
Galvanized steel gauge conversion to aluminum sheet thickness
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 1-14, p. 1-32)

Galvanized Rigidity Class

Fig. 1-41:

A
B

Aluminum Dimension
per Galvanized Class
C
D

K
Rigidity Class Conversion

Galvanized steel rigidity conversion


(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 1-15, p. 1-32)

Round Metal Duct Construction


Duct construction requirements for round galvanized steel and aluminum ducts are given in Fig.
1-42 and Fig. 1-43, reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards,
SMACNA, Table 3-2 and 3-3, pp. 3-3, 3-4. These tables give the galvanized steel gauge and the
aluminum commercial size as a function of static pressure, type of seam (spiral or longitudinal)
and diameter. The program uses these tables to select the gage for round ducts.
Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

39

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

Duct
Diameter
in Inches

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Maximum 2" w.g.


Static Positive

Maximum 10" w.g.


Static Positive

Spiral
Seam
Gauge

Longitudi
nal Seam
Gauge

Spiral
Seam
Gauge

8
14

28
28

28
26

26

26

36

Maximum 2" w.g.


Static Negative
Spiral
Seam
Gauge

26
26

Longitudi
nal
Seam
Gauge
24
24

28
26

Longitudi
nal
Seam
Gauge
24
24

24

24

22

24

22

24

22

22

20

22

20

50

22

20

20

20

20

18

60

20

18

18

18

18

16

84

18

16

18

16

16

14

Fig. 1-42:
Gauge Selection
Round duct gauge selection, galvanized steel
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 3-2, p. 3-3)

Duct Diameter
in Inches

Maximum 2" w.g.


Static Positive

Maximum 2" w.g.


Static Negative

8
14

Spiral
Seam Gauge
.025
.025

Longitudinal
Seam Gauge
.032
.032

Spiral
Seam Gauge
.025
.032

Longitudinal
Seam Gauge
.040
.040

26

.032

.040

.040

.050

36

.040

.050

.050

.063

50

.050

.063

.063

.080

60

.063

.080

N.A.

.090

84

N.A.

.090

N.A.

N.A.

Fig. 1-43:
Aluminum Gauge Schedule
Aluminum round duct gauge schedule
(reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,
Table 3-3, p. 3-4)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

40

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Quantity Takeoffs
Ductwork
Since the unit weight of all sheet-metal sheets is pounds per square foot of surface area, the
program therefore calculates the surface area of all ductwork to be used.
The program then calculates the total weight of sheet-metal ductwork on the basis of gauge for
fibrous ducts and commercial size for aluminum ducts. The one-inch thick fibrous glass ducts are
estimated on a per square foot basis.
The program calculates the quantity of flexible ducts based on the diameter and linear foot of
flexible ducts. Duct reinforcements are not included in the weights of the ductwork.
Lining and Insulation
The program calculates the lining and insulation quantity takeoff on a per square foot basis.
Appendix Three: Duct Fittings

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

41

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Figures and tables appearing in this appendix are reprinted with permission from HVAC Systems
Duct Design, SMACNA, 1981. Use the table to identify the figure that corresponds to each
keyword choice on the fittypes form.
Keyword
el001
el002
el007
el003
el004
el005
el006
tc001
td001
td003
td004
td002
td005
td006
jc001
jc002
jc003
jc004
jc005
jc006
jc007
jc008
jc009
jd001
jd002
jd003
jd004
jd005
jd006
jd007
jd008
jd009
jd010
jd011
jd012
jd013
jd014
jd015

Table and
Figure
6-6: A
6-6: B
6-6: C
6-6: D
6-6: F
6-6: G
6-6: H
6-8: A
6-7: A
6-7: C
6-7: D
6-7: B
6-7: J
6-7: E
6-9: A
6-9: B
6-9: C
6-9: D
6-9: E
6-9: F
6-9: G
6-9: H
6-9: I
6-10: A
6-10: B
6-10: G
6-10: H
6-10: I
6-10: J
6-10: K
6-10: L
6-10: M
6-10: N
6-10: Q
6-10: V
6-10: U
6-10: W
6-10: X

Duct Cross Section to which Coefficient "C" is referred is at the top of each table. Negative
numbers indicate that the static regain exceeds the dynamic pressure loss of the fitting.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

42

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Table 6-6
LOSS COEFFICIENTS, ELBOWS
Use the velocity pressure (Vp) of the upstream section. Fitting Loss (TP) = C x Vp
A.

Elbow, Smooth Radius (Die Stamped), Round (2)


Coefficients for 90 Elbows: (See Note 1)
R.D.

0.5

0.75

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

0.71

0.33

0.22

0.15

0.13

0.12

Note 1:

B.

For angles other than 90 multiply by the following factors:

20

30

45

60

75

90

110

130

150

180

0.31

0.45

0.60

0.78

0.90

1.00

1.13

1.20

1.28

1.40

Elbow, Round, 3 to 5 pc -- 90 (2)


Coefficient C
#

R.D.

Pieces

0.5

0.75

1.0

1.5

2.0

0.46

0.33

0.24

0.19

0.50

0.37

0.27

0.24

0.98

0.54

0.42

0.34

0.33

Coefficient C (See Note 2)


H

20

30

45

60

75

90

0.08

0.16

0.34

0.55

0.81

1.2

Note 2: Correction factor for Reynolds number -- KRe


-4

Re 10

10

14

KRe

1.40

1.26

1.19

1.14

1.09

1.06

1.04

1.0

For Standard Air: Re = 8.56 DV


where: D = duct diameter, inches

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

43

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

D.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Elbow, Rectangular, Mitered (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 2 -- Page 6.13)
H

E.

HW
0.25

0.5

0.75

1.0

1.5

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

8.0

20

0.08

0.08

0.08

0.07

0.07

0.07

0.06

0.06

0.05

0.05

0.05

30

0.18

0.17

0.17

0.16

0.15

0.15

0.13

0.13

0.12

0.12

0.11

45

0.38

0.37

0.36

0.34

0.33

0.31

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

0.24

60

0.60

0.59

0.57

0.55

0.52

0.49

0.46

0.43

0.41

0.39

0.38

75

0.89

0.87

0.84

0.81

0.77

0.73

0.67

0.63

0.71

0.58

0.57

90

1.3

1.3

1.2

1.2

1.1

1.1

0.98

0.92

0.89

0.85

0.83

8.0
1.2
0.4
4
0.2
1
0.1
7
0.1
5

Elbow, Rectangular, Mitered with Converging or Diverging Flow (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 2 -- Page 6.13)
HW

F.

W1 W
0.6

0.8

1.2

1.4

1.6

2.0

0.25

1.8

1.4

1.1

1.1

1.1

1.1

1.0

1.7

1.4

1.0

0.95

0.90

0.84

4.0

1.5

1.1

0.81

0.76

0.72

0.66

1.5

1.0

0.69

0.63

0.60

0.55

Elbow, Rectangular, Smooth Radius without Vanes (15)


Coefficients for 90 elbows (See Note 1)
Coefficient C (See Note 3)
RW

HW
0.25

0.5

0.75

1.0

1.5

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

0.5

1.5

1.4

1.3

1.2

1.1

1.0

1.0

1.1

1.1

1.2

0.75

0.57

0.52

0.48

0.44

0.40

0.39

0.39

0.40

0.42

0.43

1.0

0.27

0.2

0.23

0.21

0.19

0.18

0.18

0.19

0.20

0.27

1.5

0.22

0.20

0.19

0.17

0.15

0.14

0.14

0.15

0.16

0.17

2.0

0.20

0.18

0.16

0.15

0.14

0.13

0.13

0.14

0.14

0.15

Note 3: Correction Factor for Reynolds number -- KRe


-4

RW

Re 10
1

10

14

20

0.5

1.40

1.26

1.19

1.14

1.09

1.06

1.04

1.0

1.0

0.75

2.0

1.77

1.64

1.56

1.46

1.38

1.30

1.15

1.0

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

44

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Install Equation Editor and doubleclick here to view equation.

For Standard Air: Re = 8.56 DV


where: D = duct diameter, inches V = duct velocity, fpm
G.

Elbow, Rectangular, Smooth Radius with Splitter Vanes (2)


NOTES FOR THIS FIGURE ONLY:
A) See Page 5.12 to calculate splitter vane spacing.
B) CR = Curve Ratio
C) Use correction factors in Note 1 on Page 6.13 for elbows other
than90.
Coefficient C

1
spli
tter
van
e

0.218
0.302
0.361
0.408
0.447

0.25
0.52
0.36
0.28
0.22
0.18

0.5
0.40
0.27
0.21
0.16
0.13

1.0
0.43
0.25
0.18
0.14
0.11

1.5
0.49
0.28
0.19
0.14
0.11

2.0
0.55
0.30
0.20
0.15
0.11

HW
3.0
0.66
0.35
0.22
0.16
0.12

4.0
0.75
0.39
0.25
0.17
0.13

5.0
0.84
0.42
0.26
0.18
0.14

6.0
0.93
0.46
0.28
0.19
0.14

7.0
1.0
0.49
0.30
0.20
0.15

8.0
1.1
0.52
0.32
0.21
0.15

0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50

0.480
0.509
0.535
0.557
0.577

0.15
0.13
0.11
0.10
0.09

0.11
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06

0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05

0.09
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.05

0.09
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04

0.09
0.08
0.06
0.05
0.04

0.10
0.08
0.06
0.05
0.04

0.10
0.08
0.07
0.05
0.05

0.11
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05

0.11
0.09
0.07
0.06
0.05

0.12
0.09
0.07
0.06
0.05

0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25

0.362
0.450
0.507
0.550
0.585

0.26
0.17
0.12
0.09
0.08

0.20
0.13
0.09
0.07
0.05

0.22
0.11
0.08
0.06
0.04

0.25
0.12
0.08
0.05
0.04

0.28
0.13
0.08
0.06
0.04

0.33
0.15
0.09
0.06
0.04

0.37
0.16
0.10
0.06
0.05

0.41
0.17
0.10
0.06
0.05

0.45
0.19
0.11
0.07
0.05

0.48
0.20
0.11
0.07
0.05

0.51
0.21
0.11
0.07
0.05

0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50

0.613
0.638
0.659
0.677
0.693

0.06
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.03

0.04
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02

0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02

0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02

0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02

0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01

0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01

0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01

0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01

0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01

0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01

0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25

0.467
0.549
0.601
0.639
0.669

0.11
0.07
0.05
0.03
0.03

0.10
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02

0.12
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.02

0.13
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.02

0.14
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.02

0.16
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.02

0.18
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.02

0.19
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.02

0.21
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.02

0.22
0.08
0.05
0.03
0.02

0.23
0.09
0.05
0.03
0.02

0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50

0.693
0.714
0.731
0.746
0.760

0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01

0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

RW

CR

0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

45

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

H.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Elbow, Rectangular, Mitered with Turning Vanes (2)


SINGLE THICKNESS VANES
Dimensions, inches

*No
.

Coef
f

2.0

1.5

0.75

0.12

4.5

2.25

0.15

4.5

3.25

1.60

0.18

*Numbers are for reference only.

*When extension of trailing edge is not provided for this vane, losses
are approximately unchanged for single elbows, but increase
considerably for elbows in series.
DOUBLE THICKNESS VANES
Coefficient C
Dimensions,
in.

*No
.

2.0

2
3
4

Velocity (V), fpm


Remarks
1000

2000

3000

4000

1.5

0.27

0.22

0.19

0.17

Embossed Vane Runner

2.0

1.5

0.33

0.29

0.26

0.23

Push-On Vane Runner

2.0

2.13

0.38

0.31

0.27

0.24

Embossed Vane Runner

4.5

3.25

0.26

0.21

0.18

0.16

Embossed Vane Runner

*Numbers are for reference only.

I.

Elbows, 90, Rectangular, Z-Shaped (15)


Coefficients for WH = 1.0 (See Notes 4 and 5)
LH

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0.62

0.90

1.6

2.6

3.6

4.0

4.2

4.2

4.2

LH

2.4

2.8

3.2

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

9.0

10.0

3.7

3.3

3.2

3.1

2.9

2.8

2.7

2.6

2.5

2.3

Note 4: For W/H values other than 1.0 apply the following favctor:
WH

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.0

1.5

2.0

3.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

1.10

1.07

1.04

1.0

0.95

0.90

0.83

0.78

0.72

0.70

14

Note 5: Correction factor for Reynolds number -- KRe


4

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Re 10

10

KRe

1.40

1.26

1.19

1\.1
4

1.09

1.06

1.04

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

1.0

46

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Install Equation Editor and doubleclick here to view equation.

For Standard Air:


Re = 8.56 D V
where: D= hydraulic diameter, inches V = duct velocity, fpm
J.

Elbows, 90, Rectangular in Different Planes (15)


Coefficients for H/W - 1.0: (See Notes 4 & 5 -- Page 6.16)
L/W

K.

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.2

2.4

2.9

3.3

3.4

3.4

3.4

3.3

3.2

3.1

L/W

2.4

2.8

3.2

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

9.0

10.0

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.0

2.9

2.8

2.7

2.5

2.4

2.3

Elbows, 30, Round, Offset (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 5 -- Page 6.16)

L.

L/D

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0.15

0.15

0.16

0.16

0.16

0.16

Elbows, 90, Rectangular Wye or Tee Shape

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

47

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Table 6-7
LOSS COEFFICIENTS TRANSITIONS (Diverging Flow)
Use the velocity pressure (Vp) of the upstream section. Fitting loss (TP) = C x Vp
A.

Transition, Round, Conical (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 6)

Re

A1A
9

Re = 8.56 DV

V = Upstream Velocity
(fpm)

B.

20

30

45

60

90

120

180

0.5 10

2
4
6
10
16

0.14
0.23
0.27
0.29
0.31

0.19
0.30
0.33
0.38
0.38

0.32
0.46
0.48
0.59
0.60

0.33
0.61
0.66
0.76
0.84

0.33
0.68
0.77
0.80
0.88

0.32
0.64
0.74
0.83
0.88

0.31
0.63
0.73
0.84
0.88

0.30
0.62
0.72
0.83
0.88

2
4
6
10
16

0.07
0.15
0.19
0.20
0.21

0.12
0.18
0.28
0.24
0.28

0.23
0.36
0.44
0.43
0.52

0.28
0.55
0.90
0.76
0.76

0.27
0.59
0.70
0.80
0.87

0.27
0.59
0.71
0.81
0.87

0.27
0.58
0.71
0.81
0.87

0.26
0.57
0.69
0.81
0.87

2
4
6
10
16

0.05
0.17
0.16
0.21
0.21

0.07
0.24
0.29
0.33
0.34

0.12
0.38
0.46
0.52
0.56

0.27
0.51
0.60
0.60
0.72

0.27
.56
0.69
0.76
0.79

0.27
0.58
0.71
0.83
0.85

0.27
0.58
0.70
0.84
0.87

0.27
0.57
0.70
0.83
0.89

where:
D = Upstream
Diameter (inches)

16

2 10

6 10

Transition, Rectangular, Pyramidal (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 6)

A1/A

When = 180

16

20

30

45

60

90

120

180

0.18

0.22

0.25

0.29

0.31

0.32

0.33

0.30

0.36

0.43

0.50

0.56

0.61

0.63

0.63

0.63

0.42

0.47

0.58

0.68

0.72

0.76

0.76

0.75

10

0.42

0.49

0.59

0.70

0.80

0.87

0.85

0.86

Note 6: A = Area (Entering airstream), A1 = Area (Leaving airstream)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

48

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

C.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Transition, Round to Rectangular (15)


Install Equation Editor and doubleclick here to view equation.

D.

Transition, Rectangular to Round (15)

For Figures C and D, compute using the


equations and find the coefficient C from Table 67B. Transition, Rectangular, Pyramidial.

Install Equation Editor and doubleclick here to view equation.

E.

Transition, Rectangular, Side Straight (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 6)

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

A1A

14

20

30

45

60

90

180

0.09

0.12

0.20

0.34

0.37

0.38

0.35

0.16

0.25

0.42

0.60

0.68

0.70

0.66

0.19

0.30

0.48

0.65

0.76

0.83

0.80

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

49

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

F.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Transition, Symmetric at Fan With Duct Sides Straight (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 6)
A1/A

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

10

0.05

0.07

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.11

15

0.06

0.09

0.11

0.13

0.13

0.14

20

0.07

0.10

0.13

0.15

0.16

0.16

25

0.08

0.13

0.16

0.19

0.21

0.23

30

0.16

0.24

0.29

0.32

0.34

0.35

35

0.24

0.34

0.39

0.44

0.48

0.50

Note 6: A = Area (Entering airstream), A1 = Area (Leaving airstream)


G.

Transition, Asymmetric at Fan with Duct Sides Straight, Top Level (15)
Coefficient C (See Note 6)

H.

A1/A

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

10

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.10

0.11

0.11

15

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

0.15

20

0.12

0.14

0.15

0.16

0.17

0.18

25

0.15

0.18

0.21

0.23

0.25

0.26

30

0.18

0.25

0.30

0.33

0.35

0.35

35

0.21

0.31

0.38

0.41

0.43

0.44

Transition, Asymmetric at Fan With Duct Sides Straight, Top 10 Down (15)
Coefficient C (See Note 6)
A1/A

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

10

0.11

0.13

0.14

0.14

0.14

0.14

15

0.13

0.15

0.16

0.17

0.18

0.18

20

0.19

0.22

0.24

0.26

0.28

0.30

25

0.29

0.32

0.35

0.37

0.39

0.40

30

0.36

0.42

0.46

0.49

0.51

0.51

35

0.44

0.54

0.61

0.64

0.66

0.66

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

50

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

I.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Transition, Asymmetric at Fan With Duct Sides Sgraight, Top 10 Up (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 6)
A1/A

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

10

0.05

0.08

0.11

0.13

0.13

0.14

15

0.06

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.15

0.15

20

0.07

0.11

0.14

0.15

0.16

0.16

25

0.09

0.14

0.18

0.20

0.21

0.22

30

0.13

0.18

0.23

0.26

0.28

0.29

35

0.15

0.23

0.28

0.33

0.35

0.36

Note 6: A = Area (Entering airstream), A1 = Area (Leaving airstream)


J.

Transition, Pyramidal at Fan With Duct (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 6)
A1/A

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

10

0.10

0.18

0.21

0.23

0.24

0.25

15

0.23

0.33

0.38

0.40

0.42

0.44

20

0.31

0.43

0.48

0.53

0.56

0.58

25

0.36

0.49

0.55

0.58

0.62

0.64

30

0.42

0.53

0.59

0.64

0.67

0.69

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

51

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Table 6-8
LOSS COEFFICIENTS TRANSITIONS (Converging Flow)
Use the velocity pressure (Vp) of the downstream section. Fitting loss (TP) = C x Vp
A.

Contraction, Round and Rectangular, Gradual to Abrupt (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 7)

A1/
A

B.

10

1540

5060

90

120

150

180

0.05

0.05

0.06

0.12

0.18

0.24

0.26

0.05

0.04

0.07

0.17

0.27

0.35

0.41

0.05

0.04

0.07

0.18

0.28

0.36

0.42

10

0.05

0.05

0.08

0.19

0.29

0.37

0.43

Contraction, Conical, Round and Rectangular (15)


Install Equation Editor and doubleclick here to view equation.

(See Note 7)
A/A1
K

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.85

0.68

0.50

0.30

0.18

1.0
0

Co

L/D

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

10

20

30

40

60

100

140

180

0.025

0.50

0.47

0.45

0.43

0.41

0.40

0.42

0.45

0.50

0.05

0.50

0.45

0.41

0.36

0.33

0.30

0.35

0.42

0.50

0.075

0.50

0.42

0.35

0.30

0.26

0.23

0.30

0.40

0.50

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

52

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

0.10

0.50

0.39

0.32

0.25

0.22

0.18

0.27

0.38

0.50

0.15

0.50

0.37

0.27

0.20

0.16

0.15

0.25

0.37

0.50

0.60

0.50

0.27

0.18

0.13

0.11

0.12

0.23

0.36

0.50

Note 7: A1 = Area (Entering airstream), A = Area (Leaving airstream)


C.

Contraction, Rectangular Slot to Round (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 7)
Re 104

10

20

0.27

0.25

0.20

0.17

0.14

0.11

0.04

40
0

Table 6-9
LOSS COEFFICIENTS, CONVERGING JUNCTIONS (Tees, Wyes)
Use the velocity pressure (Vp) of the downstream section. Fitting loss (TP) = C x Vp
A.

Converging Wye, Round (2)


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Install Equa
click here t

Ab/Ac

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.4

-.56

0.44

0.35

0.28

0.15

0.04

0.05

0.5

-.48

-.37

-.28

-.21

-.09

0.02

0.11

0.6

-.38

-.27

-.19

-.12

0.10

0.18

0.7

-.26

-.16

-.08

-.01

0.10

0.20

0.28

0.8

-.21

-.02

0.05

0.12

0.23

0.32

0.40

0.9

0.04

0.13

0.21

0.27

0.37

0.46

0.53

1.0

0.22

0.31

0.38

0.44

0.53

0.62

0.69

1.5

1.4

1.5

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.7

1.8

2.0

3.1

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.3

3.3

3.3

2.5

5.3

5.3

5.3

5.4

5.4

5.4

5.4

3.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

53

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Main, Coefficient C
Ab/Ac

Install Equa
click here t

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.1

-8.6

-4.1

-2.5

-1.7

-.97

-.58

-.34

0.2

-6.7

-3.1

-1.9

-1.3

-.67

-.36

-.18

0.3

-5.0

-2.2

-1.3

-.88

-.42

-.19

-.05

0.4

-3.5

-1.5

-.88

-.55

-.21

-.05

0.05

0.5

-2.3

-.95

-.51

-.28

-.06

0.06

0.13

0.6

-1.3

-.50

-.22

-.09

0.05

0.12

0.17

0.7

-.63

-.18

-.03

0.04

0.12

0.16

0.18

0.8

-.18

0.01

0.07

0.10

0.13

0.15

0.17

0.9

0.03

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.13

1.0

-0.01

0.10

0.02

0.04

0.05

Note 8: A = Area (sq. in.), Q = Airflow (cfm), V = Velocity (fpm)


B.

Converging Tee, 90, Round (15)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
A/A

Q/Q

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.1

0.40

-.37

-.51

-.46

-.50

-.51

-.52

0.2

3.8

0.72

0.17

-.02

-.14

-.18

-.24

0.3

9.2

2.3

1.0

0.44

0.21

0.11

-.08

0.4

16

4.3

2.1

0.94

0.54

0.40

0.32

0.5

26

6.8

3.2

1.1

0.66

0.49

0.42

0.6

37

9.7

4.7

1.6

0.92

0.69

0.57

0.7

43

13

6.3

2.1

1.2

0.88

0.72

0.8

65

17

7.9

2.7

1.5

1.1

0.86

0.9

82

21

9.7

3.4

1.8

1.2

0.99

1.0

101

26

12

4.0

2.1

1.4

1.1

Main Coefficient C (See Note 8)


Q/Q
Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

54

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

C.

0.16

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

0.27

0.38

0.46

0.53

0.57

0.59

0.60

0.63

0.65

Converging Tee, Round Branch to Rectangular Main


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
V

Qb/Qs
0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1200
fpm

-.63

-.55

0.13

0.23

0.78

1.30

1.93

3.10

4.88

5.60

1200
fpm

-.49

-.21

0.23

0.60

1.27

2.76

2.75

3.70

4.93

5.95

For Main Loss Coefficient (C) see Fitting 6-9B


When:
Ab/As

As/Ac

Ab/Ac

1.0

0.5

0.5

D.

Converging Tee, Rectangular Main and Branch


Branch Coefficient (See Note 8)
V

Qb/Qs
0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1200
fpm

-.75

-.53

0.03

0.33

1.03

1.10

2.15

2.93

4.18

4.78

1200
fpm

-.69

-.21

0.23

0.67

1.17

1.66

2.67

3.36

3.93

5.13

For Main Loss Coefficient


(C) see Fitting 6-9B
When:
Ab/As
0.5

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

As/Ac

Ab/Ac

1.0

0.5

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

55

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

E.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Converging Wye, Conical, Round (2)


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Qb/Q
Install Equa
Install Equa
click here
click
t here st
0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0.3

0.2
0.3

-2.4
-2.8

-.01
-1.2

2.0
0.12

3.8
1.1

5.3
1.9

6.6
2.6

7.8
3.2

8.9
3.7

9.8
4.2

11
4.6

0.4

0.2
0.3
0.4

-1.2
-1.6
-1.8

0.93
-.27
-.72

2.8
0.81
0.07

4.5
1.7
0.66

5.9
2.4
1.1

7.2
3.0
1.5

8.4
3.6
1.8

9.5
4.1
2.1

10
4.5
2.3

11
4.9
2.5

0.5

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5

-.46
-.94
-1.1
-1.2

1.5
0.25
-.24
-.38

3.3
1.2
0.42
0.18

4.9
2.0
0.92
0.58

6.4
2.7
1.3
0.88

7.7
3.3
1.6
1.1

8.8
3.8
1.9
1.3

9.9
4.2
2.1
1.5

11
4.7
2.3
1.6

12
5.0
2.5
1.7

0.6

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6

-.55
-1.1
-1.2
-1.3
-1.3

1.3
0
-.48
-.62
-.69

3.1
0.88
0.10
-.14
-.26

4.7
1.6
0.54
0.21
0.04

6.1
2.3
0.89
0.47
0.26

7.4
2.8
1.2
0.68
0.42

8.6
3.3
1.4
0.85
0.57

9.6
3.7
1.6
0.99
0.66

11
4.1
1.8
1.1
0.75

12
4.5
2.0
1.2
0.82

0.8

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8

0.06
-.52
-.67
-.73
-.75
-.77
-.78

1.8
0.35
-.05
-.19
-.27
-.31
-.34

3.5
1.1
0.43
0.18
0.05
-.02
-.07

5.1
1.7
0.80
0.46
0.28
0.18
0.12

6.5
2.3
1.1
0.68
0.45
0.32
0.24

7.8
2.8
1.4
0.85
0.58
0.43
0.33

8.9
3.2
1.6
0.99
0.68
0.50
0.39

10
3.6
1.8
1.1
0.76
0.56
0.44

11
3.9
1.9
1.2
0.83
0.61
0.47

12
4.2
2.1
1.3
0.88
0.65
0.50

1.0

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.0

---------------

21
-.54
-.21
-.05
-.02
-.10
-.14

3.7
1.2
0.62
0.37
0.23
0.11
0.05

5.2
1.8
0.96
0.60
0.42
0.24
0.16

6.6
2.3
1.2
0.79
0.55
0.33
0.23

7.8
2.7
1.5
0.93
0.66
0.39
0.27

9.0
3.1
1.7
1.1
0.73
0.43
0.29

11
3.7
2.0
1.2
0.80
0.46
0.30

11
3.7
2.0
1.2
0.85
0.47
0.30

12
4.0
2.1
1.3
0.89
0.48
0.29

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

56

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

F.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Converging Tee, 45 Entry Branch to Rectangular Main

When:

Ab/As

As/Ac

Ab/Ac

0.5

1.0

0.5

Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)


QbQc
Vc

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

< 1200
fpm

-.83

-.68

-.30

0.28

0.55

1.03

1.50

1.93

2.50

3.03

> 1200
fpm

-.72

-.52

-.23

0.34

0.76

1.14

1.83

2.01

2.90

3.63

Main, Coefficient C (See Note 8)


Qb/Q
Install Equa
Install Equa
click here
click
t here st
0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0.3

0.2
0.3

5.3
5.4

-.01
3.7

2.0
2.5

1.1
1.6

0.34
1.0

-.20
0.53

-.61
0.16

-.93
-.14

-1.2
-.38

-1.4
-.58

0.4

0.2
0.3
0.4

1.9
2.0
2.0

1.1
1.4
1.5

0.46
0.81
1.0

-.07
0.42
0.68

-.49
0.08
0.39

-.83
-.20
0.16

-1.1
-.43
-.04

-1.3
-.62
-.21

-1.5
-.78
-.35

-1.7
-.92
-.47

0.5

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5

0.77
0.85
0.88
0.91

0.34
0.56
0.66
0.73

-.09
0.25
0.43
0.54

-.48
0.03
0.21
0.36

-.81
-.27
0.02
0.21

-1.1
-.48
-.15
0.06

1.3
-.67
-.30
-.06

-1.5
-.82
-.42
-.17

-1.7
-.96
-.54
-.26

-1.8
-1.1
-.64
-.35

0.6

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6

0.30
0.37
0.40
0.43
0.44

0
0.21
0.31
0.37
0.41

-.34
-.02
0.16
0.26
0.33

-.67
-.24
-.01
0.14
0.24

-.96
-.44
-.16
0.02
0.14

-1.2
-.63
-.30
-.09
0.05

-1.4
-.69
-.43
-.20
-.03

-1.6
-.93
-.54
-.29
-.11

-1.8
-1.1
-.64
-.37
-.18

-1.9
-1.2
-.73
-.45
-.25

0.8

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8

-.06
0
0.04
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09

-.27
-.08
0.02
0.08
0.12
0.15
0.17

-.57
-.25
-.08
0.02
0.09
0.14
0.18

-.86
-.43
-.21
-.06
0.03
0.10
0.16

-1.1
-.62
0-.34
-.16
-.04
0.05
0.11

-1.4
-.78
-.46
-.25
-.11
-.01
0.07

-1.6
-.93
-.57
-.34
-.18
-.07
0.02

-1.7
-1.1
-.67
-.42
-.25
-.12
-.02

-1.9
-1.2
-.77
-.50
-.31
-.17
-.07

-2.0
-1.3
-.85
-.57
-.37
-.22
-.11

1.0

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.0

---------------

-.39
-.19
-.10
0.04
0
0.06
0.09

-.67
0-.35
-.19
-.09
-.02
0.07
0.13

-.96
-.54
-.31
-.17
-.07
0.05
0.13

-1.2
-.71
-.43
-.26
-.14
0.02
0.11

-1.5
-.87
-.55
-.35
-.21
-.03
0.08

-1.6
-1.0
-.66
-.44
-.28
-.07
0.06

-1.8
-1.2
-.77
-.52
-.34
-.12
0.03

-2.0
-1.3
-.86
-.59
-.40
-.16
-.01

-2.1
-1.4
-.94
-.66
-.46
-.20
-.03

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

57

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

G.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Symmetrical Wye, Dovetail, Rectangular (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 8)
A1b/Ac or A2b/Ac

0.50

1.0

0.23

0.07

Install Equation Editor and do


click here to view equation.

H.

Converging Wye, Rectangular (15)


Branch, Coefficient (See Note 8)
Ab/As

Qb/Qc
Ab/Ac

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.25

0.25

-.50

0.50

1.2

2.2

3.7

5.8

8.4

11

0.33

0.25

-1.2

-.40

0.40

1.6

3.0

4.8

6.8

8.9

11

0.5

0.5

-.50

-.20

0.25

0.45

0.70

1.0

1.5

2.0

0.67

0.5

-1.0

-.60

-.20

0.10

0.30

0.60

1.0

1.5

2.0

1.0

0.5

-2.2

-1.5

-.95

-.50

0.40

0.80

1.3

1.9

1.0

1.0

-.60

-.30

-.10

-.04

0.13

0.21

0.29

0.36

0.42

1.33

1.0

-1.2

-.80

-.40

-.20

0.16

0.24

0.32

0.38

2.0

1.0

-2.1

-1.4

-.90

-.50

-.20

0.20

0.25

0.30

Main, Coefficient (See Note 8)


Ab/As

Qb/Qc
Ab/Ac

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.75

0.25

0.30

0.30

0.20

-.10

-.45

-.92

-1.5

-2.0

-2.6

1.0

0.5

0.17

0.16

0.10

-0.08

-.18

-.27

-.37

-.46

0.75

0.5

0.27

0.35

0.32

0.25

0.12

-.03

-.23

-.42

-.58

0.5

0.5

1.2

1.1

0.90

0.65

0.35

-.40

-.80

-1.3

1.0

1.0

0.18

0.24

0.27

0.26

0.23

0.18

0.10

-.12

0.75

1.0

0.75

0.36

0.38

0.35

0.27

0.18

0.05

-.08

-.22

0.5

1.0

0.80

0.87

0.80

0.68

0.55

0.40

0.25

0.08

-.10

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

58

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

I.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Wye, Rectangular and Round (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Q1b/Qc or Q2b/Qc
0

0.1
0

0.2
0

0.3
0

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.0

15

2.6

1.9

1.3

.77

-.30

0.10

0.41

0.67

0.85

0.97

1.0

30

2.1

1.5

1.0

.53

-.10

0.28

0.69

0.91

1.1

1.4

1.6

45

1.3

.93

.55

.16

0.20

0.56

0.92

1.26

1.6

2.0

2.3

When:
A1b = A2b
Ac
= A1b + A2b

Table 6-10
LOSS COEFFICIENTS, DIVERGING JUNCTIONS (Tees, Wyes)
Use the velocity pressure (Vp) of the upstream section. Fitting loss (TP) = C x Vp
A.

Tee or Wye, 30 to 90, Round (15)


Main, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vs/Vc
C

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.35

0.28

0.22

0.17

0.13

0.09

0.06

0.02

Wye = 30: Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)


Qb/Qc
Ab/Ac
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.75

0.55

0.40

0.28

0.21

0.16

0.15

0.16

0.19

0.72

0.51

0.36

0.25

0.18

0.15

0.16

0.20

0.26

0.69

0.46

0.31

0.21

0.17

0.16

0.20

0.28

0.39

0.65

0.41

0.26

0.19

0.18

0.22

0.32

0.47

0.67

0.59

0.33

0.21

0.20

0.27

0.40

0.62

0.92

1.3

0.55

0.28

0.24

0.38

0.76

1.3

2.0

---

---

0.40

0.26

0.58

1.3

2.5

---

---

---

---

0.28

1.5

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Wye = 45: Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)


Qb/Qc
Ab/Ac
0.8
0.7
Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.78

0.62

0.49

0.40

0.34

0.31

0.32

0.35

0.40

0.77

0.59

0.47

0.38

0.34

0.32

0.35

0.41

0.50

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

59

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

0.74

0.56

0.44

0.37

0.35

0.36

0.43

0.54

0.68

0.71

0.52

0.41

0.38

0.40

0.45

0.59

0.78

1.0

0.66

0.47

0.40

0.43

0.54

0.69

0.95

1.3

1.7

0.66

0.48

0.52

0.73

1.2

1.8

2.7

---

---

0.56

0.56

1.0

1.8

---

---

---

---

---

0.60

2.1

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Wye = 60: Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)


Qb/Qc
Ab/Ac
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.83

0.71

0.62

0.56

0.52

0.50

0.53

0.60

0.68

0.82

0.69

0.61

0.56

0.54

0.54

0.60

0.70

0.82

0.81

0.68

0.60

0.58

0.58

0.61

0.72

0.87

1.1

0.79

0.66

0.61

0.62

0.68

0.76

0.94

1.2

1.5

0.76

0.65

0.65

0.74

0.89

1.1

1.4

1.8

2.3

0.80

0.75

0.89

1.2

1.8

2.6

3.5

---

---

0.77

0.96

1.6

2.5

---

---

---

---

---

1.0

2.9

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Tee = 90: Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)


Qb/Qc
Ab/Ac
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
B.

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.95

0.92

0.92

0.93

0.94

0.95

1.1

1.2

1.4

0.95

0.94

0.95

0.98

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.4

1.6

0.96

0.97

1.0

1.1

1.1

1.2

1.4

1.7

2.0

0.97

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.4

1.5

1.8

2.1

2.5

0.99

1.1

1.3

1.5

1.7

2.0

2.4

---

---

1.1

1.4

1.8

2.3

---

---

---

---

---

1.3

1.9

2.9

---

---

---

---

---

---

2.1

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

90 Conical Tee, Round (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

0.85

0.74

0.62

0.52

0.42

0.36

0.32

0.32

0.37

0.52

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

60

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

C.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

45 Conical Wye, Round (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

0.84

0.61

0.41

0.27

0.17

0.12

0.12

0.14

0.18

0.27

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
D.

90 Tee, Round, Rolled 45 with 45 Elbow, Branch 90 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

1.32

1.51

1.60

1.65

1.74

1.87

2.0

2.2

2.5

2.7

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
E.

90 Tee, Round, with 90 Elbow, Branch 90 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

1.03

1.08

1.18

1.33

1.56

1.86

2.2

2.6

3.0

3.4

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
F.

90 Tee, Round, Rolled 45 with 60 Elbow, Branch 45 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

1.06

1.15

1.29

1.45

1.65

1.89

2.2

2.5

2.9

3.3

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
G.

90 Conical Tee, Round, Rolled 45 with 45 Elbow, Branch 90 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

0.94

0.88

0.84

0.80

0.82

0.84

0.87

0.90

0.95

1.02

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

61

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

H.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

90 Conical Tee, Round, Rolled 45 with 60 Elbow, Branch 45 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

0.95

0.90

0.86

0.81

0.79

0.79

0.81

0.86

0.96

1.10

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
I.

45 Wye, Round, Rolled 45 with 60 Elbow, Branch 90 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

0.88

0.77

0.68

0.65

0.69

0.73

0.88

1.14

1.54

2.2

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
J.

45 Conical Wye, Round, Rolled 45 with 60 Elbow, Branch 90 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

0.82

0.63

0.52

0.45

0.42

0.41

0.40

0.41

0.45

0.56

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
K.

45 Wye, Round, Rolled 45 with 30 Elbow, Branch 45 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

0.84

0.72

0.62

0.54

0.50

0.56

0.71

0.92

1.22

1.66

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
L.

45 Conical Wye, Round, Rolled 45 with 30 Elbow, Branch 45 to Main (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/
Vc
C

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1.0

0.93

0.71

0.55

0.44

0.42

0.42

0.44

0.47

0.54

0.62

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

62

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

M. 45 Wye, Conical Main and Branch with 45 Elbow, Branch 90 to Main (15)
Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/Vc

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

0.76

0.60

0.52

0.50

0.51

0.52

0.56

0.61

0.68

Vb/Vc

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

0.86

1.1

1.4

1.8

2.2

2.6

3.1

3.7

4.2

Main, Coefficient C (See Note 8)

N.

Vs/Vc

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0.14

0.06

0.05

0.09

0.18

0.30

0.46

0.64

0.84

1.0

Tee, 45 Entry, Rectangular Main and Branch


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Qb/Qc
Vb/Vc

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.2

0.91

0.4

0.81

0.79

0.6

0.77

0.72

0.70

0.8

0.78

0.73

0.69

0.66

1.0

0.78

0.98

0.85

0.79

0.74

1.2

0.90

1.11

1.16

1.23

1.03

0.86

1.4

1.19

1.22

1.26

1.29

1.54

1.25

0.92

1.6

1.35

1.42

1.55

1.59

1.63

1.50

1.31

1.09

1.8

1.44

1.50

1.75

1.74

1.72

2.24

1.63

1.40

0.9

1.17

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

63

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

P.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Tee, 45 Entry, Rectangular Main and Branch with Damper


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Qb/Qc
Vb/Vc

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.2

0.61

0.4

0.46

0.61

0.6

0.43

0.50

0.54

0.8

0.39

0.43

0.62

0.53

1.0

0.34

0.57

0.77

0.73

0.68

1.2

0.37

0.64

0.85

0.98

1.07

0.83

1.4

0.57

0.71

1.04

1.16

1.54

1.36

1.18

1.6

0.89

1.08

1.28

1.30

1.69

2.09

1.81

1.47

1.8

1.33

1.34

2.04

4.78

1.90

2.40

2.77

2.23

0.9

1.92

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
Q.

Tee, Rectangular Main and Branch


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Qb/Qc
Vb/Vc

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.2

1.03

0.4

1.04

1.01

0.6

1.11

1.03

1.05

0.8

1.16

1.21

1.17

1.12

1.0

1.38

1.40

1.30

1.36

1.27

1.2

1.52

1.61

1.68

1.91

1.47

1.66

1.4

1.79

2.01

1.90

2.31

2.28

2.20

1.95

1.6

2.07

2.28

2.13

2.71

2.99

2.81

2.09

2.20

1.8

2.32

2.54

2.64

3.09

3.72

3.48

2.21

2.29

0.9

2.57

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

64

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

R.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Tee, Rectangular Main and Branch with Damper


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Qb/Qc
Vb/Vc

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.2

0.58

0.4

0.67

0.64

0.6

0.78

0.76

0.75

0.8

0.88

0.98

0.81

1.01

1.0

1.12

1.05

1.08

1.18

1.29

1.2

1.49

1.48

1.40

1.51

1.70

1.91

1.4

2.10

2.21

2.25

2.29

2.32

2.48

2.53

1.6

2.72

3.30

2.84

3.09

3.30

3.19

3.29

3.16

1.8

3.42

4.58

3.65

3.92

4.20

4.15

4.14

4.10

0.9

4.05

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
S.

Tee, Rectangular Main and Branch with Extractor


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Qb/Qc
Vb/Vc

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.2

0.60

0.4

0.62

0.69

0.6

0.74

0.80

0.82

0.8

0.99

1.10

0.95

0.90

1.0

1.48

1.12

1.41

1.24

1.21

1.2

1.91

1.33

1.43

1.52

1.55

1.64

1.4

2.47

1.67

1.70

2.04

1.86

1.98

2.47

1.6

3.17

2.40

2.33

2.53

2.31

2.51

3.13

3.25

1.8

3.85

3.37

2.89

3.23

3.09

3.03

3.30

3.74

0.9

4.11

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).
Main, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/V

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0.03

0.04

0.07

0.12

0.13

0.14

0.27

0.30

0.25

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

65

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

T.

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Tee, Rectangular Main to Round Branch


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Qb/Qc
Vb/Vc

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.2

1.00

0.4

1.01

1.07

0.6

1.14

1.10

1.08

0.8

1.18

1.31

1.12

1.13

1.0

1.30

1.38

1.20

1.23

1.26

1.2

1.46

1.58

1.45

1.31

1.39

1.48

1.4

1.70

1.82

1.65

1.51

1.56

1.64

1.71

1.6

1.93

2.06

2.00

1.85

1.70

1.76

1.80

1.88

1.8

2.06

2.17

2.20

2.13

2.06

1.98

1.99

2.00

0.9

2.07

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).

Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)


Vb/Vc

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

15

0.81

0.65

0.51

0.38

0.28

0.20

0.11

0.06

0.14

0.30

0.51

0.76

1.0

30

0.84

0.69

0.56

0.44

0.34

0.26

0.19

0.15

0.15

0.30

0.51

0.76

1.0

45

0.87

0.74

0.63

0.54

0.45

0.38

0.29

0.24

0.23

0.30

0.51

0.76

1.0

60

0.90

0.82

0.79

0.66

0.59

0.53

0.43

0.36

0.33

0.39

0.51

0.76

1.0

90

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

66

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

Main, Coefficient C (See Note 8)

1560

90
As/Ac

Vs/Vc

0-1.0

0-0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Install Equation Editor and do
click here to view equat
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0

1.0
0.81
0.64
0.50
0.36
0.25
0.16
0.04
0
0.07
0.39
0.90
1.8
3.2

1.0
0.81
0.64
0.50
0.36
0.25
0.16
0.04
0
0.07
0.39
0.90
1.8
3.2

1.0
0.81
0.64
0.52
0.40
0.30
0.23
0.17
0.20
0.36
0.79
1.4
2.4
4.0

1.0
0.81
0.64
0.52
0.38
0.28
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.21
0.59
1.2
-----

1.0
0.81
0.64
0.50
0.37
0.27
0.18
0.07
0.05
0.14
0.39
-------

1.0
0.81
0.64
0.50
0.36
0.25
0.16
0.04
0
0.07
---------

V.

Tee Rectangular Main to Conical Branch (2)


Branch Coefficient C (See Note 8)
Vb/Vc

0.40

0.50

0.75

1.0

1.3

1.5

0.80

0.83

0.90

1.0

1.1

1.4

For Main Loss Coefficient (c) see Fitting 6-10A (Page 6.27).

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

67

Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis

SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

W. Wye, Rectangular (15)


Branch, Coefficient C (See Note 8)

90 Branch

Qb/Qc

Ab/
Ac

Ab/
Ac

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.25

0.25

0.55

0.50

0.60

0.85

1.2

1.8

3.1

4.4

6.0

0.33

0.25

0.35

0.35

0.50

0.80

1.3

2.0

2.8

3.8

5.0

0.5

0.5

0.62

0.48

0.40

0.40

0.48

0.60

0.78

1.1

1.5

0.67

0.5

0.52

0.40

0.32

0.30

0.34

0.44

0.62

0.92

1.4

1.0

0.5

0.44

0.38

0.38

0.41

0.52

0.68

0.92

1.2

1.6

1.0

1.0

0.67

0.55

0.46

0.37

0.32

0.29

0.29

0.30

0.37

1.33

1.0

0.70

0.60

0.51

0.42

0.34

0.28

0.26

0.26

0.29

2.0

1.0

0.60

0.52

0.43

0.33

0.24

0.17

0.15

0.17

0.21

Main, Coefficient C (See Note 8)

X.

Qb/Qc

Ab/
As

Ab/
As

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.25

0.25

-.01

-.03

-.01

0.05

0.13

0.21

0.29

0.38

0.46

0.33

0.25

0.08

-.02

-.01

0.02

0.08

0.16

0.24

0.34

0.5

0.5

-.03

-.06

-.05

0.06

0.12

0.19

0.27

0.35

0.67

0.5

0.04

-.02

-.04

-.03

-.01

0.04

0.12

0.23

0.37

1.0

0.5

0.72

0.48

0.28

0.13

0.05

0.04

0.09

0.18

0.30

1.0

1.0

-.02

-.04

-.04

-.01

0.06

0.13

0.22

0.30

0.38

1.33

1.0

0.10

0.01

-.03

-.01

0.03

0.10

0.20

0.30

2.0

1.0

0.62

0.38

0.23

0.13

0.08

0.05

0.06

0.10

0.20

Symmetrical Wye, Dovetail, Rectangular (15)


Coefficient C (See Note 8)
A1b/Ac or A2b/Ac

0.50

1.0

0.30

0.25

When: R/W = 1.5


Install Equation Editor and doubleclick here to view equation.

Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E.

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP

68

Anda mungkin juga menyukai