CDM PDD DRJ 15june06

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02
CDM Executive Board
page 1
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD)
Version 02 - in effect as of: 1 July 2004)
CONTENTS
A.
General description of project activity
B.
Application of a baseline methodology
C.
Duration of the project activity / Crediting period
D.
Application of a monitoring methodology and plan
E.
Estimation of GHG emissions by sources
F.
Environmental impacts
G.
Stakeholders comments
Annexes
Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity
Annex 2: Information regarding public funding
Annex 3: Baseline information
Annex 4: Monitoring plan
This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.
CDM Executive Board
page 2
SECTION A. General description of project activity

A.1
Title of the project activity:
Darajat Unit III Geothermal Project.

Document version number 2.
15th June 2006.
A.2.
Description of the project activity:
Purpose of Project Activity:

The purpose of this project is to increase the share of renewable energy resources utilization in Indonesia
by installing additional capacity of geothermal power generation. Chevron Geothermal Indonesia, Ltd
(CGI filling the roles formerly undertaken by ChevronTexaco Energy Indonesia Limited which itself
filled the roles formerly undertaken by Amoseas Indonesia Inc. and Texaco Darajat Ltd.), under a Joint
Operating Contract (JOC) with PT. Pertamina (Persero) [the Indonesian state-owned oil and gas
company] and an Energy Sales Contract (ESC) with PT. PLN (Persero) [PLN the state owned electricity
grid operator, retailer and majority generator (through 100% ownership of the two major generating
companies in Indonesia)], is planning to expand operations at Darajat, in West Java, by installing Unit III,
a 110MW geothermal power plant. The project is expected to provide electrical energy to meet growing
national and regional demand and is consistent with the Indonesian Governments energy diversification
and sustainable development goals. The electricity produced from this power plant will be supplied to the
Java-Madura-Bali (JAMALI) interconnected grid system. Darajat Unit III will reduce emissions of
greenhouse gases by avoiding fossil fuel-based electricity generation by other generators on the grid.
Currently, CGI is involved with two geothermal power plants in operation at Darajat:
Unit I (55 MW - built, owned and operated since 1994 by Indonesia Power, a wholly owned
company of PLN, the state electricity company; the steam is supplied by CGI);
and Unit II (901 MW built and operated since 2000 by CGI).
In Darajat Unit III, steam produced from the field will be used to generate electricity, which will then be
sold to PLN (as is the case for Unit II). The electricity feeds into the JAMALI grid and is distributed
through PLN's transmission system. Agreement to supply electricity to the JAMALI grid, through
partnership with PLN and Pertamina, is critical for developing the Darajat geothermal field.
The Darajat Unit III Project will meet the following objectives:
Contribute to the supply of electricity to the JAMALI interconnected grid system to meet the
critical shortage of energy;
Avoid greenhouse gas emissions that would otherwise occur from the electricity generation by
predominantly fossil fuel based sources;
Assist in achieving the Indonesian governments energy diversification goal of minimizing oil
consumption by maintaining the use of renewable resources; and
Contribute to sustainable development in the West Java region of Indonesia.
The Ministry of the Environment, serving as Indonesias National CDM Focal Point, has formulated four
sustainable development criteria which are the minimum which must be fulfilled by CDM projects being
hosted in Indonesia. These national criteria are posted at:
http://dna-cdm.menlh.go.id/en/susdev/
1
The turbine nameplate rating of Unit II is 81.3MW. It is currently operated above this due to favourable power factor
conditions on the Jamali grid. The nameplate rating of Unit I is 55 MW.
CDM Executive Board
page 3
A summary of the four national criteria is given below:

1) Environmental Sustainability
2) Economic Sustainability
3) Social Sustainability
4) Technological Sustainability
The scope of evaluation is the area directly impacted by the project.

Criteria: Sustainable environment i.e. implementing the conservation
or diversification of natural resource utilization; Safety and Health of
the local community
The scope of evaluation is within the administrative border of the
regency. If the impacts are cross boundary, the scope of evaluation
includes all impacted regencies. Criteria: local community welfare.
The scope of evaluation is within the administrative border of the
regency. If the impacts are cross boundary, the scope of evaluation
includes all impacted regencies. Criteria: community participation;
the project does not reduce the social integrity of the community.
The scope of evaluation is the national border. Criteria: Technology
transfer.
The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources has elaborated on the national sustainable development
criteria by outlining seven specific criteria for energy-related projects which are complementary to, and
aligned with the four national criteria. The work to develop these seven criteria was carried out by the
Ministrys Research and Development Center for Energy and Electricity Technology (Pusat Penelitian
dan Pengembangan Teknologi Energi dan Ketenagalistrikan) which has defined the sectors sustainable
development criteria for energy related CDM projects (Ministerial Decree No. 953.K/50/2003).
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
To promote implementation of programs on energy diversification or conservation

To promote development of clean energy and/or technology on clean energy
To enhance protection of environmental functions
To promote growth of local economies
To increase employment opportunities
To promote transfer of technology, and
To implement community development.
By reference to these seven criteria, the proposed Darajat Unit III Project fulfils both the energy-related
and the national sustainable development criteria, as follows:
Compliance to Criterion 1: Implementing Darajat Unit III will assist in achieving the Indonesian
governments energy diversification goal of minimizing oil consumption by increasing the use of
renewable resources. Further detail on the Government of Indonesias energy strategy is provided
in Section B. Currently, the share of geothermal capacity on the JAMALI grid is exceptionally
small (only about 4%). Implementing the Darajat Unit III Project will assist in maintaining the
overall percentage of renewable electricity generation that feeds the JAMALI grid and serves the
region. Furthermore, the project will adhere to all federal, regional and local rules and regulations.
CGI and the Darajat Unit III Project will be held to the highest environmental standards by both
internal and external experts to minimize potential impacts from the project.
Compliance to Criterion 2: Geothermal energy is a renewable resource that can be sustained for
decades. The exploitation of geothermal energy as opposed to fossil fuel consumption can
substantially decrease GHG and air pollutant emissions.
Compliance to Criterion 3: Compared to other types of power plants, geothermal plants have
relatively little effect on the environment. Only a very small area (less than 4 hectares) of the
5,000 hectare geothermal resources concession will be directly impacted by the construction and
operation of the Unit III Project; geothermal development using the latest in high angle drilling and
land use efficiency requires minimal land utilization. CGI and the Darajat Unit III Project will be
CDM Executive Board
page 4
held to the highest environmental standards by both internal and external experts to minimize
potential impacts from the project. The project will adhere to all local, regional, and federal rules
and regulations. Installation of Unit III will result in minimal environmental disturbance because it
will rely on much of the infrastructure installed during construction of Darajat Unit II.
Compliance to Criteria 4 & 5: Construction and operation of Darajat Unit III will result in
significant (over $128MM) foreign direct investment in Indonesia. Over ninety percent of the
employees at CGI are Indonesian and this investment will increase the number of local jobs during
both the construction and operation phases of the unit. The use of local labour and sub-contracts
with local businesses is a mandatory corporate requirement for Chevron business units and the
parties constructing the project. CGI is also implementing world class safety standards in the
construction and operation of the project. These requirements will bring direct and tangible
benefits to the indigenous community. Non-skilled workers from the local communities constitute
20% of the total workforce, and this equates to more than 100 personnel. Included in this local
community involvement program is post job training to allow workers to enhance their potential
for future job opportunities. Additionally, apprenticeship programs are being provided for local
high school students.
Compliance to Criterion 6: The project will therefore build capacity in a range of areas from
systems management and operation to manual skills.
Compliance to Criterion 7: CGI is actively involved in community support activities under the four
pillars of education, health, socio-economics and infrastructure. CGI has contributed extensively
to community driven projects and will continue supporting local community development;
examples include promoting educational opportunities through the provision of scholarships,
improvements to the infrastructure in surrounding communities such as water supplies and roads.
CGIs goals in the local communities are driven by its desire for the activities and operations to
create benefits for society, the environment and the communities in which CGI works.
A.3.
Project participants:
Name of Party involved

((host) indicates a host Party)
The Government of Indonesia

(host)
The Government of the United

Kingdom of Great Britain &
Northern Ireland
Private and/or public entity(ies)

project participants (as
applicable)
Chevron Geothermal Indonesia,

Ltd (CGI is registered in
Indonesia)
PT. Darajat Geothermal

Indonesia (CGI's 5% partner in
Darajat Unit III)
Chevron Limited (registered in

the United Kingdom)
Kindly indicate if the Party

involved wishes to be
considered as project
participant (Yes/No)
No
No
Under its JOC with Pertamina and its ESC with PLN, CGI supplies geothermal steam to a 55 MW power
plant (Unit I, owned by PLN) and owns and operates a 90 MW power plant (Unit II) in Darajat, West
Java. CGI also operates a steam and electricity co-generation facility (300 MW) in North Duri, Central
Sumatra on behalf of PT Mandau Cipta Tenaga Nusanatara. Pertamina, PLN and CGI amended the ESC
in 2004 and CGI expects to begin commercial operation of the new 110 MW Darajat Unit III in the 4th
Quarter of 2006.
CDM Executive Board
page 5
Through its acquisition of Unocal in 2005, Chevron Corporation has acquired the Unocal geothermal
assets in Indonesia (Gunung Salak) and in the Philippines (Tiwi and Mak Ban). The Gunung Salak
operation covers steam supply to six power plant units totalling 375 MW. Of this total, 195 MW (3 units)
is owned and operated by Chevron and sells electricity to PLN, and 180 MW (3 units) is owned by PLN.
In the Philippines Chevron supplies steam to power plants totalling 630 MW (Tiwi 230 MW, Mak Ban
400 MW) owned by the National Power Corporation.
Chevron Ltd. is the UK-based trading affiliate of Chevron Corporation. Chevron Ltd. will provide the
GHG trading capability for this project.
PT. Darajat Geothermal Indonesia is CGI's 5% partner in Darajat Unit II and Unit III and is part of
PT. Austindo Nusantara Jaya, an Indonesian conglomerate with interests in agribusiness, electric power
generation, mining and financial services.
As host country, the Government of Indonesia (GOI) has a key role in the development of this CDM
project activity. As noted in Section A2, the GOI has already set the sustainable development criteria for
such CDM project activities. In an announcement concerning the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol the
Ministry of the Environment noted that investment in the proposed Darajat Unit III was one of the
benefits brought by ratification. The Designated National Authority, which was established by the GOI
in July 2005, will have a critical role in the review process and approval decision concerning the project
activity.
The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland is the Annex I Party which
is expected to authorize the voluntary participation of Chevron Ltd. in this project.
A.4.
Technical description of the project activity:

A.4.1. Location of the project activity:
7119 - 71540 South Latitude, 1074154 - 1074540 East Longitude. See Figures 1 & 2.
Figure 1: Location of the Darajat Unit III Project
CDM Executive Board
page 6
A.4.1.1.
Host Party(ies):
A.4.1.2.
Region/State/Province etc.:
A.4.1.3.
City/Town/Community etc:
Indonesia.
West Java.
Garut.
A.4.1.4.
Detail of physical location, including information allowing the
unique identification of this project activity (maximum one page):
Situated 150km from Jakarta, the Darajat area is characterized by medium to high topographic relief. The
concession area ranges in height from approximately 1500m to 2200m above sea level with an average
height of more than 1600m. The major peaks within the concession area are Mt. Cawene, Mt. Gagak and
Mt. Kiamis. The area is characterized by a mountain range that is formed by the activities of relatively
young volcanoes. Volcanic activities in the area are indicated by the formation of hot springs, fumaroles
and craters. The area surrounding Darajat is partly a mixture of nature reserve, production forest and
farmed land (in a progression from highest to lowest elevation). Being cool and fertile, hundreds of
hectares in the area are used for cultivation.
Figure 2: Location of the Project Activity
Unit I
PLN 55 MW
Unit III
110 MW
Unit II
90 MW
Nature Reserve
Reserve
Private
Land
CTEI
Protected
Forest
1 KM.
CDM Executive Board
page 7
A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity:

Renewable electricity generation for a grid (geothermal).
A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity:
Geothermal energy in Darajat is stored in a steam reservoir within the earth's crust. Dry saturated steam
at high pressure is produced at the surface from wells drilled into this reservoir. The steam is delivered to
the power generation facilities through a steam gathering system, to move the turbine blades and drive a
generator hence generating electricity. Exhaust steam from the turbine is condensed in a direct contact
condenser and approximately 25% of the condensed exhaust steam is reinjected into the geothermal
reservoir, with the remaining 75% being evaporated in the cooling tower. See Figure 3 below depicting
the proposed geothermal plant and reservoir at Darajat.
The power plant will consist of a conventional geothermal condensing steam turbine generator with a
capacity of 110 MW. Energy of condensation will be transferred to the circulating cooling water system
in the steam exhaust condenser and will subsequently be rejected to atmosphere in a conventional
mechanical draught cooling tower. This technology is technically sound and environmentally safe as is
demonstrated by hundreds of similar installations around the world, including Indonesia. The same
technology is being utilized by Darajat Units I and II Geothermal Projects.
Figure 3: Schematic diagram of proposed Darajat Unit III Project geothermal power plant and
steam reservoir
CDM Executive Board
page 8
A.4.4. Brief explanation of how the anthropogenic emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse

gas (GHGs) by sources are to be reduced by the proposed CDM project activity, including why the
emission reductions would not occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, taking into
account national and/or sectoral policies and circumstances:
Darajat Unit III will reduce emissions of greenhouse gases in Indonesia by substituting renewable energy
for fossil fuel-fired generation. In the absence of the project, fossil-based generation (predominantly
coal) is anticipated to satisfy electricity demand due to its favourable economics. As discussed in Section
B, the Governments most recent energy statistics for 2004 and plans for 2005-2025 show that coal and
other fossil fuels dominate both capacity and electricity generation on the JAMALI grid2. Significantly,
expansions of the grid are expected to further maintain the dominance of fossil fuel-fired power plant
capacity and generation.
To calculate the baseline emissions, this project uses ACM0002 Consolidated baseline methodology
for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources. This provides the combined margin
which is an average of the build margin and operating margin on the JAMALI grid. The combined
margin on the JAMALI grid is 0.728 tCO2equ/MWh.
By contrast, the actual greenhouse gas emissions that will result from operation of the proposed Darajat
Unit III Project are estimated to be just 0.03014 tCO2equ/MWh or 27,155 tonnes CO2equ per year (given
an expected output of 900,966 MWh/year). Emissions from the proposed Darajat Unit III Project are
limited to those from the co-existing non-condensable gases in the steam evaporated in the cooling tower
plus some additional emissions from combustion of fuel for operational purposes (vehicles and engines).
The baseline methodology ACM0002 requires the use of a tool for the demonstration and assessment of
additionality. The application of this tool to the Darajat Unit III Project is briefly summarized below. A
detailed description of additionality is provided in Section B.
Step 0 Project start date
The project is expected to commence operation in Q3 2006. The crediting period is expected to start after
the registration of the project activity.
Step 1 Identify Alternatives & Regulatory Analysis
The following alternatives are identified:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
The proposed project activity is not undertaken as a CDM project activity

No further investment in the project activity (equal to continuation of the current situation)
The project participant sells the proposed project
Build a gas-fired power plant of similar or larger capacity
Build an oil-fired steam power plant of similar capacity, and
Build a coal-fired steam power plant of similar or larger capacity.
The project activity and the alternatives to the project, such as natural gas-fired or coal-fired power
generation, are consistent with current laws and regulations in Indonesia. Furthermore, there is no legal
requirement to build Darajat Unit III.
Step 2 Investment Analysis
Given the option in the additionality tool to choose either Step 2 or Step 3, we have chosen to apply the
barrier analysis (Step 3) instead of the investment analysis (Step 2) in Section B. The barrier analysis is
Refer to Footnotes 12 and 13.
CDM Executive Board
page 9
selected as it provides a better reflection of the complexity of the project investment decision and the
investment barrier is included in the barrier analysis.
Step 3 Barrier Analysis
There are greater barriers to foreign direct investment in geothermal power on the JAMALI grid than in
other forms of investment in power generation particularly coal-based electricity generation. These
barriers to investment in geothermal energy supply to the JAMALI grid include:
i)
Investment barriers due to political and economic circumstances in Indonesia, which impede the flow
of any foreign direct investment into Indonesia (this applies to thermal and geothermal capacity
expansion);
ii) Tariff barriers to independent power producers in the electricity market due to the absence of open
market competition for selling electricity, with the state power monopoly under political and
commercial pressure to keep power purchase prices low (this applies to thermal and geothermal
capacity expansion);
iii) Technological barriers to geothermal generation due to subsurface / reservoir risk and other technical
aspects; and
iv) Barriers to alternative sources of electricity generation due to the abundance of fossil fuel reserves
(particularly certain types of coal which are not suitable for export) in Indonesia.
By registering Darajat Unit III as a CDM activity, the additional revenue from the sale of CERs helps to
alleviate the barriers or the investment risks faced by the project developer. The best indicators of the
numerous barriers to investment in geothermal energy in Indonesia are the level of new investment and
the current capacity relative to the total geothermal resource. The estimated potential geothermal
resource in Indonesia is 20,000 MW3, whereas only 800 MW has been developed commercially to date.
Furthermore, apart from the decision to invest in Darajat Unit III (in October 2004) and Kamojang Unit
IV (in February 2006) there have been no new investment funding decisions which have led to increases
in geothermal capacity on the JAMALI grid since 1997. Further detail on these indicators and the level
of geothermal generation in Indonesia is given in Step Four Common Practice.
Step 4 Common Practice
Historically, geothermal projects have made a relatively small contribution to Indonesias generation mix.
In 2004, the most recent year for which comprehensive data is available, geothermal energy represented
just 7% of the total MWh dispatched to the JAMALI grid and just 4% of the grid capacity. As much as
87% of the total MWh dispatched to the grid is from fossil-fuel based power generation, 47% of which is
from coal-based electricity generation.
As noted above, Indonesia has an estimated potential geothermal resource of 20,000 MW and only
800 MW have been developed commercially to date; furthermore, current levels of investment (zero new
investment decisions since 1997 apart from the 60 MW Kamojang Unit IV plant which was confirmed in
February 2006) by independent power producers in new geothermal capacity indicate that this is not
common practice.
Step 5 Impact of CDM Registration
Returns must be sufficient to overcome the investment barriers (i.e., risks) inherent in the development of
the Darajat Unit III Project. Analysis in Section B shows that the value of CERs obtained through the
CDM process has a strong influence on the projects economics and helps to overcome some of the
barriers outlined above. If approved by the CDM Executive Board the CERs could increase the annual
revenue of the project by up to 10%, the IRR of the project by up to 220 basis points, and the NPV by up
to 22% (values as at investment funding decision in October 2004). This additional value and the benefit
3
National Energy Policy 2003-2020: Integrated Policy to Support a Sustainable National Development. Ministry of Energy &
Mineral Resources, Jakarta (2004).
CDM Executive Board
page 10
of participating in the CDM process were significant factors in the decision to proceed with the project.
Indeed one of the conditions for reaching agreement on 10 August 2004 with PLN on the value
negotiated for the selling price of electricity from Unit III was that All rights to and revenue from any
and all emissions credits and trading as a result of the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol for CDM or other
Gas Emission Credit market mechanism related to the Darajat Contract Area are the property of and
owned by CGI. Given the risks that exist now and which will continue to exist in the future for the
proposed Darajat Unit III Project, the returns must be sufficient to offset them and potential CER credits
will help to overcome the barriers to investment by improving the project's economics.
The potential value of the emissions reduction credits were considered in the very early stages of the
projects planning. In 2002 the emissions reductions were calculated as part of a baseline study
undertaken by URS.
As discussed in Section B, during the internal recommendation to proceed with the project, members of
Chevrons Decision Review Board noted [1st October 2004] that the CDM component of the project was
an important aspect in their decision. In the announcement of the decision to invest in the project,
Wahyudin Yudiana, president director of Chevrons Indonesia Business Unit, stated that: Tradable
United Nations Clean Development Mechanism credits, (CDM) credits generated by the project for
CO2 emissions reduction, are to be pursued for approvals by appropriate Indonesian and international
authorities and contribute significantly to the Project economics, which is a significant factor in the
approval of the Project.
A.4.4.1.
Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting
period:
Using an average approach for the operating margin as per the methodology ACM0002 the JAMALI
grid has a combined margin emissions baseline rate of 0.728 tCO2equ/MWh. Darajat Unit III is expected
to generate 900,966 MWh/year, and have emissions of 0.03014 tCO2equ/MWh, yielding annual
emissions reductions of 628,748 tCO2equ over the first crediting period. Start up of Unit III is expected
on 1st October 2006.
Years
2006
Annual estimation of emission reductions in

tonnes of CO2equ
209,582
2007
628,748
2008
628,748
2009
628,748
2010
628,748
2011
628,748
2012
628,748
2013
419,166
Total estimated reductions (tonnes CO2equ)
4,401,236
Total number of crediting years
7 years (first crediting period)
Annual average estimated reductions (tonnes

CO2equ) over the crediting period
628,748
A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity:

There is no public funding for the Darajat Unit III Project.
CDM Executive Board
page 11
SECTION B. Application of a baseline methodology

B.1.
Title and reference of the approved baseline methodology applied to the project activity:
ACM00024: Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable
sources
B.1.1. Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project
activity:
Consistent with the Applicability described in Annex 2 of ACM0002:
This methodology is applicable to capacity additions to grid-connected renewable power generation

project activities from geothermal sources such as Darajat Unit III.
The project does not involve switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy at the site of the project
activity.
The geographic and system boundaries for the JAMALI electricity grid can be clearly identified in
the case of Darajat Unit III, and information on the characteristics of the grid is available.
B.2.
Description of how the methodology is applied in the context of the project activity:
The Darajat Unit III geothermal power plant will be a 110MW capacity addition to the JAMALI grid.
The project activity mainly reduces carbon dioxide emissions by substituting fossil fuel-based electricity
generation on the grid with renewable electricity based on geothermal energy. ACM0002, the
Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources,
and the Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality5 are applied to this project. Given
that new projects compete with existing plant on the JAMALI grid, operating and build margins are used
to derive the emissions factor for the connected grid or the Combined Margin. The selected approach
under ACM0002 is Existing actual or historical emissions, as applicable.
The additionality tool is used to demonstrate that the GHG emissions are reduced below those that would
have occurred in the absence of the CDM project activity. See Section B.3.
The emissions sources from Darajat Unit III includes very small emissions of carbon dioxide and methane
from non-condensable gases contained in the geothermal steam and extremely small carbon dioxide
emissions from combustion of fossil fuels required to operate the geothermal power plant. The spatial
extent of the project boundary includes the project site (Darajat Unit III) and all power plants connected
to the JAMALI grid (which can be dispatched without significant transmission constraints). There are no
imports or exports of electricity to or from the JAMALI grid.
The baseline scenario is the electricity that would have otherwise been generated by the operation of gridconnected power plants and by the addition of new generation sources. For the Darajat Unit III baseline,
option (d) average operating margin is used to calculate the operating margin, and option 1 calculate
the build margin emissions factor ex ante is used to calculate the build margin. The most recent capacity
additions to the grid that comprise 20% of the system gives a larger annual generation than the five most
recently built power stations. The reasons for selecting the average operating margin are as follows:
Version 6 dated 19 May 2006. Downloaded from:

http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/approved.html
5
Refer Footnote 3.
CDM Executive Board
page 12
1. Data is not gathered and made publicly available from an official source to calculate a dispatch data
analysis operating margin;
2. Data is not gathered and made publicly available from an official source to calculate a simple
adjusted operating margin; and
3. Low-Cost/Must-Run resources constitute more than 50% of total grid generation in each of the
years 2000-2004, precluding the use of the simple operating margin (refer to D.2.1.4).
As per ACM0002, leakage emissions in particular from construction of the power plant, and from
geothermal wells on bleed or on test are not considered as part of the baseline scenario or project
emissions. Reductions in output from Unit I or Unit II that are attributable to the project activity are
considered leakage; this is addressed in Section E.
Calculations for the baseline emissions for the JAMALI Grid based on the Average Operating Margin
method and the Build Margin are presented in Annex 3.
B.3.
Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below
those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity:
As defined in ACM0002, the baseline scenario is the following: electricity which would have otherwise
been generated by the operation of grid-connected power plants and by the addition of new generation
sources. The project scenario is the development of the Darajat Unit III plant.
The additionality of the Darajat Unit III Project scenario shown in Steps 0-5 is established using the
Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality.
Step 0 Preliminary screening based on the starting date of the project activity
The project is expected to commence operation in Q3 2006. The crediting period is expected to start after
the implementation of the project activity.
Step 1 Identification of alternatives to the project activity consistent with current laws and
regulations
Sub-step 1a. Define alternatives to the project activity
1. The following alternatives available to the project participants are identified.
a) The proposed project activity is not undertaken as a CDM project activity
b) No further investment in the project activity (or continuation of the current situation)
c) The project participant sells the proposed project (CGI owns the rights to build Unit III which it
could sell to another project developer)
d) Build a gas-fired power plant of similar or larger capacity
e) Build an oil-fired steam power plant of similar capacity, and
f) Build a coal-fired steam power plant of similar or larger capacity.
Sub-step 1b. Enforcement of applicable laws and regulations
2. Both the project scenario and the other alternatives are in compliance with all applicable legal and
regulatory requirements. Items 3-4 are therefore not applicable.
3. Not applicable.
4. Not applicable.
CDM Executive Board
page 13
Step 2 Investment Analysis

Not Applied.
Step 3 Barrier Analysis
Sub-step 3a. Identify barriers that would prevent the implementation of this type of the proposed
project activity:
There are a number of significant barriers that impede the implementation of geothermal projects in
Indonesia, particularly by Independent Power Producers. In general, the barriers result from the
investment climate, electricity market, and other technology risks arising from the choice of geothermal
energy. These include the following:
i) Investment Barriers due to political and economic circumstances in Indonesia, which impede the
flow of any foreign direct investment into Indonesia (whether coal or geothermal capacity
expansion);
ii) Tariff Barriers to independent power producers in the electricity market due to the absence of open
market competition for selling electricity, with the state power monopoly under political and
commercial pressure to keep power purchase prices low;
iii) Technological barriers to geothermal generation due to subsurface / reservoir risk and other
technical aspects; and
iv) Barriers to alternative sources of electricity generation due to the abundance of fossil fuel reserves
(particularly certain types of coal which are not suitable for export) in Indonesia.
By registering Darajat Unit III as a CDM activity, the additional revenue from the sale of CERs helps to
alleviate the barriers or the investment risks faced by the project developer.
i)
Investment Barriers
Chevrons experience with the Darajat Unit II project, the predecessor to the proposed project
outlined in this PDD, provides a first-hand example of the financial risks and associated costs
inherent in an uncertain investment climate. These financial risks create significant barriers to new
investment in geothermal generation in Indonesia.
The high economic growth of Indonesia throughout the early 1990s encouraged a large inflow of
private foreign capital into Indonesia. Medium and long-term electricity supply expansion and
indigenous energy resource development plans were drawn up in anticipation of continued growth in
energy demand6. When the Asian financial crisis began in mid-1997, many energy projects were
either ongoing or scheduled for implementation in the next two to three years. Others were planned
for implementation after 2000 and through 2005, and several projects were planned to come onstream through 2010. The Asian financial crisis caused the delay or cancellation of several of these
projects, and threatened many others. Many, if not most, of these projects were undertaken by the
private sector and financed through private investment.
As a result of the Asian financial crisis in 1997, the GOI suspended the development of Darajat and
put the ESC on hold. At that time the development of Darajat Unit II was already eighty percent
complete, and CGI (then Amoseas) made the decision to complete construction and attempt to
renegotiate the ESC to avoid greater financial loss. By November 1998, the construction of Unit II
was completed but the plant was not commissioned until February 2000 after an amendment to the
ESC was negotiated, with significant GOI overview and direction, at a reduced selling price (40%
lower). Unit II began commercial operation in June 2000.
Seventeenth ASEAN Ministers on Energy Meeting (1999). Impacts of Economic Crisis on energy sector: Indonesias case,
Bangkok, July 3www.eppo.go.th/inter/asean/AMEM17-Bangkok/AMEM-CR-Indonesia.html
CDM Executive Board
page 14
In 2002, reflecting on the investment climate, the US Embassy7 in Jakarta described the investment
climate for geothermal development in the following manner: The early 1990s saw the awarding of
eleven contracts for development of geothermal power plants, with a total committed capacity of
3,417 MW and original completion dates between 1998 and 2002. As a result of the 1997-1998
financial crisis, the Government suspended nine conventionally powered Independent Power Projects
(IPPs) and seven geothermal projects. The government is now attempting to resuscitate the seven
contracts but with little progress".
In a County Commercial Guide8 published the following year, the US Embassy highlighted the
ongoing risks and barriers to all foreign investment in Indonesia: Analysts cite a number of factors
contributing to Indonesia's prolonged business investment slump. These include slowing structural
reforms, rapidly rising labor costs, the lack of an efficient and transparent legal system, widespread
official corruption, signs of impending infrastructure shortages, uncertainties stemming from
Indonesia's decentralization program, and competition from other labor-intensive economies in Asia,
especially China and Vietnam. Although the Government of Indonesia has held dialogues on doing
business issues with domestic and international business groups, through the end of 2002 it made
little progress in formulating and implementing a meaningful reform program that would encourage
potential investors. Focusing on improving Indonesia's investment climate has emerged as the GOI's
top short-term policy challenge.
More recently, Pointcarbon9 has provided a brief analysis of the investment climate in Indonesia from
a CDM perspective: Indonesia has a relatively vibrant project development sector, particularly
within the energy production industry. Despite persistent rumours that the DNA notification is
around the corner, it has not taken place10. Moreover, investment climate is weak and corruption
rampant. Nevertheless, the Netherlands have signed an umbrella ERPA with the Indonesian
government on 2 million CERs.
Indonesia excels in potential for geothermal power, small hydro and waste biomass from palm oil
and forestry operations, and the oil and gas sector could substantially reduce gas flaring. Moreover,
Javas large agglomerations could sustain many landfill gas projects. The Active Geothermal
Association was the first to recognise the benefits of CDM and has developed several interesting
projects, whose additionality is not in doubt. This is due to the high levels of fossil fuel and electricity
subsidisation, which is only slowly being reduced. However, two projects prepared for the Dutch
CERUPT tender have been cancelled due to changes in ownership. The Indocement project got its
methodology for fuel switch accepted by the EB. The Dutch Bilateral Carbon Purchase Agreement
(BCPA) of 2 million CERs should spur project development.
The National Energy Policy11 itself states that an investment climate that is not conducive will
hamper the development of the energy industry. The lack of government funding for the energy
sector means that private investments will be needed more than ever. As mentioned earlier, in an
announcement concerning the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, the Ministry of the Environment
noted that investment in the proposed Darajat Unit III was one of the benefits brought by ratification.
ii) Tariff Barriers in the electricity market due to no open market competition for selling electricity
Investors are placing a premium on country risk in Indonesia due to uncertainty in law, international
arbitration and surety of payment from state companies. Generators are required to sell to the state
company PLN. With no open market competition, investors are worried that fair market prices may
not be achieved, and that once projects are completed signed contracts may be suspended as has
7
US Embassy Jakarta. 15 February 2002. (http://www.usembassyjakarta.org/econ/geothermal.html)

US Embassy Jakarta (2003). Country Commercial Guide Indonesia. (http://www.usembassyjakarta.org/). Also: Indonesia:
Investment Climate Statement 2003 (http://www.usembassyjakarta.org/econ/investment2. html); See also the 2004 Investment
Climate Statement Appendix (http://www.usembassyjakarta.org/download/2004%20Investment %20Climate.pdf).
9
Pointcarbon Country Analysis Indonesia. 27th May 2005. (http://www.pointcarbon.com)
10
This occurred on 17 July 2005. The Indonesian DNA has been registered with the UNFCCC.
11
Refer Footnote 2.
8
CDM Executive Board
page 15
happened before. This barrier is particularly significant for private sector investment in electricity
capacity expansion projects involving renewable energy. As stated in the National Energy Policy
(2003-2020) the utilization of new energy and renewable energy is not progressing because the
price of energy cannot compete with the price of fossil energy.
iii) Technological barriers specific to investment in geothermal power
There are several specific barriers to investment in geothermal power including the small size and
remote location of geothermal plants, the complicated government / operator management of the
geothermal resource and power generation, plus the significant subsurface risks.
Size & location
The small size of geothermal power projects compared with gas or coal fired power plants and (as
noted in the national energy policy) the remote location of the geothermal resource, often in hard-toaccess mountainous areas, are both barriers to investment in geothermal power plants. Small 50150MW geothermal power plants do not provide the economies of scale compared with larger 6002400MW coal or gas plants and therefore are not as attractive to Independent Power Producers.
Management of the geothermal resource
In the past in Indonesia, separated upstream and downstream regulatory management of the
geothermal resource required complex tri-party negotiations between PLN, Pertamina and the project
developer and added complexity and bureaucracy to geothermal power development. A Joint
Operating Contract (JOC) governed the contractors relationship with Pertamina. PLN bought
electricity on the basis of an Energy Sales Contract (ESC) which was agreed with the private sector
party and Pertamina. Upstream regulatory oversight responsibilities were split between the Ministry
of Energy and Mineral Resources (Directorate General of Oil and Gas) and Pertamina.
In mid-2002, and following legislation to restructure Pertamina into a state-owned limited liability
company, Pertaminas regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the government. At the same
time, the government upstream regulatory role was transferred within the Ministry of Energy and
Mineral Resources from the Directorate General of Oil and Gas to the Directorate General of Geology
and Mineral Resources (recently (late 2005/early 2006) restructured as the Directorate General of
Minerals, Coal and Geothermal Energy).
In 2003, a new Geothermal Energy Act (No. 27/2003) came into effect. This act retrospectively
protected the ongoing validity of existing JOCs and ESCs and other existing contracts, but changed
the situation for new entrants. The separated upstream and downstream regulatory management of the
geothermal resource remains, but Pertamina is no longer required as a partner in the development and
new geothermal projects which are outside existing JOCs and ESCs will not receive the favourable
tax treatment enjoyed by the existing JOCs and ESCs. They are therefore likely to find it much harder
to negotiate an acceptable electricity sales contract with PLN. At the time of writing (June 2006), no
new geothermal projects coming under this new act have been promoted. The first project to do so
will need to negotiate an uncharted and uncertain path with an undefined time frame a significant
barrier to investment. Kamojang Unit IV was mentioned previously as a new geothermal
development. However, that project was under development as an IPP contract prior to 2003 so is not
expected to be affected by the new law.
Even though the 2003 Geothermal Energy Act provided for the ongoing validity of the existing JOCs
and ESCs, the change in status of Pertamina and the change in the government regulator have given
rise to additional difficulties for existing JOCs and ESCs. There are difficulties in respect of the
existing JOCs continuing to enjoy the exemption from import taxes and duties on capital and
operational goods which was previously ratified by the GOI and which is specified in the JOCs and
ESCs (and on which the original, and renegotiated, selling prices for steam and electricity under the
ESCs were based). A temporary, legal, work-around of these difficulties on a consignment-byconsignment basis has, in some cases, taken several months and has consequently resulted in
unplanned project delays and additional costs for Darajat Unit III.
CDM Executive Board
page 16
Subsurface / reservoir risk

In comparison with conventional power projects, geothermal projects have the additional significant
risk of the uncertainty of the availability and production cost of the fuel source, i.e. steam. Whereas
conventional projects can enter into long term fuel contracts for coal, oil and gas, a geothermal
project is totally reliant on the steam produced from the reservoir deep below the earth. Often with
limited information, the geothermal project must determine the extent of the steam resource available
then produce a plan and budget to develop this as efficiently as possible. Significant capital
expenditure and risks are associated with drilling wells to both confirm and then ensure this steam
fuel delivery. Major uncertainty remains during the operation phase that the forecast remaining steam
is actually in place and can be accessed economically. The number, location and timing of wells
required to maintain the steam fuel supply is critical.
iv) Barriers due to prevailing practices and abundance of fossil fuel reserves in Indonesia
Fossil fuel reserves, particularly coal, are available in Indonesia in significant amounts; geological
studies confirm abundant availability of low-rank coal resources in Indonesia. As noted in the GOIs
National Energy Policy the low-rank coal is not in high demand in international markets (i.e. it cannot
be economically exported) and the development of mine-mouth power plants that use this fuel will be
able to increase the added value of low-rank coal. These coal resources and associated mine mouth
power plants pose a competitive barrier to alternative sources of electricity generation, including
geothermal.
Sub-step 3b. Show that the identified barriers would not prevent the implementation of at least one
of the alternatives (except the proposed project activity).
This section shows how the four main barriers identified above affect the six alternatives to the project
activity defined in Step 1. The identified barriers would not prevent implementation of two of the
alternatives (1) no further investment in the geothermal unit, and (2) investment in small- or mediumsized gas-fired power generation.
a) The proposed project activity is not undertaken as a CDM project activity.
i) Investment Barriers: CGI wishes to achieve a fair return on its investment. Darajat Unit III has to
compete for capital with other projects in Chevrons capital project portfolio. About 80% of
Chevrons annual capital budget is invested in oil and gas projects. High oil prices put this
geothermal power project at a further disadvantage within Chevron because of the internal
competition for capital. The CDM is cited as a critical aspect of the Darajat Unit III Project by
senior Chevron executives because it gives the project strategic fit within Chevrons global
operations (further detail is given in the Step 5 of the additionality tool). Even with a
conservative CER price, the CDM raises the expected income stream by up to 10%, the IRR by
up to 220 basis points and increases the NPV of the project by up to 22% (values as at investment
funding decision in October 2004). This was a significant factor in the decision to approve the
project.
ii) Tariff Barriers: The current selling price for electricity with a single sole customer does not
make this a particularly attractive investment alternative. Any further development at Darajat
faces the risk of default or revision of the ESC and given that this has happened in the past, it is
clearly a significant barrier to investment in the project.
iii) Technological Barriers: technological issues are the same whether the project is undertaken as a
CDM project or not.
iv) Prevailing Practice: All current developers of future geothermal projects under existing JOCs
and ESCs have indicated that they anticipate revenue from CDM or similar, and that has been
factored into revisions to their purchase agreements with the sole customer for such future
capacity. Developers of future geothermal projects under the new Geothermal Law are expected
to have the same expectation, even though no such projects have yet come to an agreement with a
purchaser.
CDM Executive Board
page 17
b) No further investment in the project activity (or continuation of the current situation).
There are no barriers that affect this alternative. However this is not the preferred alternative of the
Government of Indonesia.
c) The project participant sells the proposed project.
i) Investment Barriers: CGI would wish to recover all investment costs plus a fair return on these,
and the current selling price for electricity to PLN, the sole customer, is unlikely to be attractive
enough to another purchaser without the additional value of the CDM.
ii) Tariff Barriers: The current selling price for electricity with a single sole customer does not make
this a particularly attractive investment alternative. Any further development at Darajat faces the
risk of default or revision of the ESC and given that this has happened in the past, it is clearly a
significant barrier to investment in the project.
iii) Technological Barriers: Not all potential customers have the capability or desire to operate and
maintain a geothermal reservoir with its associated subsurface risks
iv) Prevailing Practice: All potential developers of geothermal capacity have indicated that the
CDM is a critical aspect of new projects.
d) Build a gas-fired power plant of similar or larger capacity.
i) Investment Barriers: For independent power producers, the sole customer's (PLN) past history of
not honouring its contracted obligations to purchase, and of agreeing to purchase but at a reduced
selling price, is a common barrier. However, gas plant can be built quickly as a combustion
turbine (open cycle), then converted to a combined cycle power plant. Fuel can be supplied by
pipeline, and the plant can be located close to load centers. Such plants are being built in the
JAMALI system.
ii) Tariff Barriers: The current selling price for electricity with a single sole customer does not make
this a particularly attractive investment alternative. Any development faces the risk of default or
revision of its ESC and given that this has happened in the past, it is clearly a significant barrier
to investment.
iii) Technological Barriers: None these facilities are currently being installed in the JAMALI grid
(such as Cilegon).
iv) Prevailing Practice: None these facilities are currently being installed in the JAMALI grid
(such as Cilegon).
e) Build an oil-fired power steam plant of similar capacity.
i) Investment Barriers: The high $ per MW installed capacity of an oil-fired steam development as
small as 110 MW would be a barrier to this type of investment.
make this a particularly attractive investment alternative. Any development faces the risk of
default or revision of its ESC and given that this has happened in the past, it is clearly a
significant barrier to investment.
iii) Technological Barriers: This alternative is not available to CGI which has a company policy to
invest in clean power generation technology.
iv) Prevailing Practice: As Indonesia has moved from a position where crude oil was a significant
foreign exchange earner, to being an oil importer, there will be increasing pressure to reduce the
amount of oil used for power generation. Figure 4 confirms that the government goal is for oil to
make up a smaller part of the power generation mix. The current high oil prices have placed a
high burden on the GOI as PLN has not been permitted to increase its retail tariffs to cover these
costs, with a resultant requirement on the GOI to provide fuel price support to PLN. This has
come at a time when local natural gas supplies have been decreasing due to field depletion and
the JAMALI load has been increasing.
CDM Executive Board
page 18
f) Build a coal-fired steam power plant of similar or larger capacity.

i) Investment Barriers: Such plants are being built in the JAMALI system (Cilacap 2 x 300MW),
so if investment barriers exist, they have been overcome. Paiton Energy Company has stated
their readiness to undertake an expansion of their coal fired power plant in East Java if an
electricity sales contract can be negotiated with PLN at the price they have offered (less than 5US
c/kWh).
make this a particularly attractive investment alternative. Any development faces the risk of
default or revision of its ESC and given that this has happened in the past, it is clearly a
significant barrier to investment.
iii) Technological Barriers: A specific barrier to new coal fired power generation is the relatively
strict environmental permitting for new coal plant, and the time it takes to acquire land required
for the project. A further barrier for a small coal-fired facility as small as 110MW is the high cost
per MW installed capacity by comparison with gas-fired open cycle or combined cycle gas
turbine power plants. The option of building a new coal fired facility is not available to CGI
which has a company policy to invest in clean power generation technology.
iv) Prevailing Practice: Abundance of low-rank coal which cannot be economically exported,
means that there is much less risk of fuel price fluctuations for new coal plant particularly those
located at the mine-mouth. None of the low-grade coal resources occur on the islands of Java,
Madura or Bali. However, such resources do exist in South Sumatra and a connection to the
JAMALI grid would not be technologically difficult.
As noted above, the main alternative to the project activity is to maintain the status quo which is low
investment by Independent Power Producers and low (or zero) investment in geothermal power projects.
The barriers identified above affect private sector investment in geothermal power projects and to a lesser
extent investment in fossil fuel based power generation, given that there is some investment in gas fired
power plant. Private investment will be required to expand power generation capacity as envisioned in
the National Energy Policy12. The Energy Policy also states that utilization of renewable sources of
energy, with the exception of hydro power, is relatively small because they are not competitive with
conventional energy. The utilization of new energy and renewable energy is not progressing because the
price of energy cannot compete with the price of fossil energy (liquid fuels excluded).
Given the barriers noted above the two most viable alternative scenarios are:
The continuation of the current situation (or no further capital investment in geothermal capacity
expansion at Darajat); or
Investment in small or medium-sized gas fired power generation which has fewer risks and
uncertainties, fewer issues with siting or environmental permitting (compared with geothermal or
coal) and can overcome the various investment barriers outlined.
Step 4 Common Practice

Sub-step 4a. Analyse other activities similar to the proposed project activity
Sub-step 4b. Discuss any similar options that are occurring.
Although Indonesia has significant geothermal resources (the National Energy Policy notes there are 51
geothermal fields around the archipelago and 17 locations are fields with high enthalpies that could
generate 20,000MW over 30 years), this type of electricity generation is currently not common practice.
In the 1990s there were expectations that total geothermal capacity on the JAMALI grid would rise to
3,417MW. By 2001 this projection was revised downwards to 1,987MW geothermal capacity by 2005.
In reality, in 2004 geothermal energy represented just 7% of the total MWh dispatched to the JAMALI
grid and just 800MW capacity or 4% of the grid capacity. The current projection for capacity expansion
12
Refer Footnote 2.
CDM Executive Board
page 19
is only for another 660MW capacity by 2025. In contrast, as much as 87% of the total MWh dispatched
is from fossil-fuel based power generation, of which 47% is coal-based electricity generation (see
Table 1). In the longer term, fossil fuels, particularly coal, are expected to dominate electricity generation
on the JAMALI grid (see Figure 4). As stated in the National Energy Policy: utilization of renewable
sources of energy, with the exception of hydro power, is relatively small because they are not competitive
with conventional energy. Apart from the decision to invest in Darajat Unit III (in October 2004) the
only new investment funding decision associated with increasing geothermal capacity on the JAMALI
grid since 1997 is the 60 MW Kamojang Unit IV plant which was confirmed in February 200613.
Chevrons success with this project would be an important stimulant to the geothermal industry in the
country after nearly a decade of stagnation.
JAMALI Grid Electricity Generation Capacity and Electricity Production 2004 14
Table 1:
2004
Capacity
MW
%
Power Plant Type

Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam Coal
Combustion Turbine - Oil
Combined Cycle - Oil
Combustion Turbine - Gas
Combined Cycle Gas
Total
6,122
6,493
89
8,307
1,050
45,088
2,044
12,509
104
13,660
95,466
13.2%
4.2%
0.5%
5.6%
4.1%
34.4%
7.5%
12.5%
0.2%
17.7%
2,559
812
104
1,080
800
6,660
1,459
2,416
40
3,417
19,347
2004
Generation
GWh
%
6.4%
6.8%
0.1%
8.7%
1.1%
47.2%
2.1%
13.1%
0.1%
14.3%
Figure 4: Planned Generation Mix (Energy) 2005-202515 (refer Annex 3, Tables 9 and 9a)
Planned Generation Mix (Electrical Energy). JAMALI Grid. 2005-2025
100%
90%
80%
Uranium
Oil
Geothermal
Natural Gas
Water
Coal
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
0%
13
US Embassy Jakarta, Energy Highlights February 2006. http://www.usembassyjakarta.org/econ/energy_highlight_feb06.html

Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization Statistics: Electricity and Energy. Year 2004. Report No.18-2005.
15
Decision of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources. No. 1213 K/31/MEM/2005. National Electricity Plan.
Department of Energy and Mineral Resources. Jakarta, 25 April 2005.
14
CDM Executive Board
page 20
Step 5 Impact of CDM Registration

Given the risks that exist in the proposed Darajat Unit III Project, the returns must be sufficient to offset
them and potential CER credits will help to overcome the barriers to investment by improving the
project's economics. If approved by the CDM Executive Board the CERs could increase the annual
revenue of the project by up to 10%, the IRR of the project by up to 220 basis points, and the NPV of the
project by up to 22% (values as at investment funding decision in October 2004). This additional value
and the benefit of participating in the CDM process (and the experience gained) are significant factors in
the decision to proceed with the project. Indeed one of the conditions for reaching agreement on 10
August 2004 with PLN on the value negotiated for the selling price of electricity from Unit III was that
All rights to and revenue from any and all emissions credits and trading as a result of the UNFCCC and
Kyoto Protocol for CDM or other Gas Emission Credit market mechanism related to the Darajat
Contract Area are the property of, and owned by CGI. As has been shown above, the project is not
business as usual for either Indonesia or Chevron.
The potential value of the emissions reduction credits was considered in the very early stages of the
projects planning. In 2002, the emissions reductions were calculated as part of a baseline study
undertaken by URS. In the internal recommendation to proceed with the project, members of Chevrons
Decision Review Board noted in October 2004 that the CDM component of the project was an important
aspect in their decision. The following statements from different members of the Decision Review Board
were included (and documented) as part of their recommendation to proceed. The statements show the
significance of the CDM aspect of Darajat Unit III in gaining the internal project approval.
The use of Clean Development Mechanism credits was extremely important in my decision for
approval. The strategic learning for future projects was important and very meaningful.
Obtaining the value for the CDM credits, and understanding how they were calculated, were
necessary for my approval to proceed. Greg Vesey President, Chevron Technology Ventures.
The possibility of securing CDM credits certainly made the project more attractive and added to
its positive recognition as environmentally friendly. The incorporation of the range of values also
took into consideration the on-going validation efforts underway with the UN. Byron Wong
Vice President, Commercial Development Asia.
Please continue to pursue CDM issue under UN standards. It is an issue that could have a
positive impact on the project economics. It is also something that Chevron, as a corporation
pursuing greenhouse gas reduction projects, should have detailed working knowledge. Charles
McHugh Regional General Counsel, Chevron International Exploration & Production.
Conditional criteria for proceeding to next CPDEP Phase IV (implementation): Decision Review
Board support to proceed to Phase IV and report this project to CTOP and Chevron OpCom is
based on the assumption that the CDM credits will materialize through the UN process. The value
created by the CDM credits significantly enhance the economic viability of this project considering
other financial risk components associated with revenue receipt. Chris Prattini Managing
Director, Indonesia Strategic Business Unit.
In the announcement of the decision to invest in the project, Wahyudin Yudiana, President Director of
Chevrons Indonesia Business Unit, noted that:
Tradable United Nations Clean Development Mechanism credits, (CDM) credits generated by the
project for CO2 emissions reduction, are to be pursued for approvals by appropriate Indonesian and
international authorities and contribute significantly to the Project economics, which is a significant
factor in the approval of the Project.
As mentioned previously, in an announcement concerning the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, the
Ministry of the Environment noted that investment in the proposed Darajat Unit III was one of the
benefits brought by ratification.
CDM Executive Board
page 21
According to Huttrer16, in 2001 Indonesian geothermists estimated that by the year 2005 fifteen fields will
have been developed so as to produce 1,987MW. Today the total geothermal capacity is closer to
800 MW indicating that investment in geothermal in Indonesia is not taking place as fast as anticipated.
As Huttrer noted: the development of Indonesia's very considerable geothermal resources was brought
to a halt by the serious economic downturn in the late 1990s and the ensuing political upheaval. The
power sales from geothermal plants were very negatively affected by this situation and until stability
returns to the country, geothermal exploration and development by non-Indonesian entities will be
scant. The benefit of CDM registration is a key factor in the implementation of the proposed Darajat
Unit III Project, but, as the electricity baseline has been established, it would also pave the way for further
geothermal capacity expansion projects in the region by lowering the CDM transaction costs.
B.4.
Description of how the definition of the project boundary related to the baseline
methodology selected is applied to the project activity:
The electricity generation process in the Darajat geothermal power plant is presented in Figure 5. The
physical boundary corresponds to the actual geographical location of the geothermal power plant and
reservoir. The dashed line indicates the boundary of the Project. Only emissions from the project activity
within these boundaries were taken into account in this study.
Figure 5:
16
Project boundary of the Darajat Unit III Project
Huttrer, G.W. (2001). The status of world geothermal power production 1995-2000. Published in Geothermics, Vol. 30, No. 1.
CDM Executive Board
page 22
The implementation of a geothermal power project involves four key stages. These stages and their
corresponding GHG emissions are as follows:
Table 2:
Geothermal Project Development Stages & their GHG Emission Sources

Stage
Source of GHG Emissions
1.
Surface Exploration by Exploratory Drilling
Gasoline and diesel combustion from machinery / diesel
2.
Steam Field Development (production well

drilling and testing)
Gasoline and diesel combustion from machinery / diesel units
3.
Power Plant and Steam Field Construction
Gasoline and diesel combustion from machinery / diesel units
4.
Operation (including make-up well drilling

and testing, if undertaken)
Fuel combustion (diesel, gasoline) by equipment and

generation sets, non-condensable gases from cooling tower,
potential fugitive emissions near steam reservoir well-heads for
existing wells or future make-up wells on test or bleed.
Since the drilling and testing of wells for surface exploration and steam field development (Stage 1 & 2
above) were completed as part of the development and construction of Darajat Units I & II, Unit III will
not incur these emissions.
In the future, when make-up well drilling is undertaken, there will be short term emissions similar to
Stage 2. As per the methodology ACM0002, leakage emissions in particular emissions arising from
construction of the power plant (Stage 3 above), and from geothermal wells on bleed or on test (Stages 2
and 4 above) are not considered as part of the baseline scenario or project emissions.
The boundary for the baseline scenario is the JAMALI interconnected electricity grid.
B.5.
Details of baseline information, including the date of completion of the baseline study
and the name of person (s)/entity (ies) determining the baseline:
The date of completion of the baseline study was 15 June 2006.
Mr. Maher Sungkar
Chevron Geothermal Indonesia, Ltd
Sentral Senayan I
Jl. Asia Afrika No. 8
Jakarta 10270
INDONESIA
OE/HES Manager
Ph.:
+62 21 5798 4278
Fax.: +62 21 5798 4477
Email: mahersk@chevron.com
CDM Executive Board
page 23
SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period

C.1
Duration of the project activity:

C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity:
1st October 2006

C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:
Thirty years.
C.2
Choice of the crediting period and related information:

C.2.1. Renewable crediting period
Renewable.
C.2.1.1.
Starting date of the first crediting period:
1st October 2006

C.2.1.2.
Length of the first crediting period:
7 years.
C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:
C.2.2.1.
Starting date:
C.2.2.2.
Length:
CDM Executive Board
page 24
SECTION D. Application of a monitoring methodology and plan

D.1.
Name and reference of approved monitoring methodology applied to the project activity:
Approved consolidated monitoring methodology ACM0002 Consolidated monitoring methodology for

zero-emissions grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources (Version 6).
D.2.
Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project
activity:
This monitoring methodology shall be used in conjunction with the approved baseline methodology
ACM0002 (Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from
renewable sources) and applied to geothermal sources.
The geographic and system boundaries for the relevant electricity grid can be clearly identified and
information on the characteristics of the grid is available.
Consistent with the Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from
renewable sources (ACM0002), the project boundary includes the following emissions sources:
For geothermal project activities, fugitive emissions of methane and carbon dioxide from noncondensable gases (NCGs) contained in geothermal steam and carbon dioxide emissions from
combustion of fossil fuels required to operate the geothermal power plant.
The monitoring methodology is applicable to the Darajat Unit III Geothermal Project as it provides a
comprehensive monitoring of the emissions reductions associated with the project. The monitoring
methodology consists of measurements of all the process and data streams needed in order to accurately
quantify the emissions associated with the proposed Darajat Unit III Project. These include:
Generated electricity and the fraction exported to the JAMALI grid, for Darajat Unit III and for the
existing Unit I and Unit II, and a daily log of Unit I and Unit II
Steam mass flow delivered to the power plant,
NCG fraction in the main steam flow,
Analysis of NCG samples to determine GHG content, and
Measurement of fuel consumption in vehicles and other ancillary on-site equipment.
The collected data will be inventoried over the lifetime of the project.
CDM Executive Board
page 25
D.2. 1. Option 1: Monitoring of the emissions in the project scenario and the baseline scenario
D.2.1.1.
Data to be collected in order to monitor emissions from the project activity, and how this data will be archived:
Recording
frequency
Proportio
n of data
to be
monitore
d
How will the

data be
archived?
(electronic/
paper)
For how long is

archived data kept?
Comment
tonne (t)
Measured
(m),
calculated
(c) or
estimated (e)
m
daily
100%
electronic
See note 1
Fraction of CO2 in
produced steam
tCO2/tsteam
every 4
months
100%
electronic
During the crediting

period and two years
after
after
Mass
fraction
Fraction of CH4 in
produced steam
tCH4/tsteam
every 4
months
100%
electronic
See note 2
15. Mt,y
Mass
quantity
tonne (t)
100%
electronic
16.
wt,CO2
Mass
fraction
Quantity of steam
generated during well
testing
Fraction of CO2 in steam
during well testing

after
after
tCO2/tsteam
100%
electronic
See note 2
17.
wt,CH4
Mass
fraction
Fraction of CH4 in steam

during well testing
tCH4/tsteam
100%
electronic

after
after
18. Fi,y
Fuel
quantities
Mass or
volume
100%
electronic
19.
COEFi
Emission
factors
coefficient
Amount of fossil fuels

used for the operation of
the geothermal plant
CO2 emission coefficients
of fossil fuels types i
displaced by used in the
operation of the
geothermal plant
tCO2/mass
or volume
unit
100%
electronic
ID number
Data
variable
Source of data
Data unit
12. MS,y
Mass
quantity
Quantity of steam
produced during the year
13.
wMain,CO2
Mass
fraction
14.
wMain,CH4
(Please use
numbers to ease
cross-referencing
to D.3)
17
footnote 17
footnote 17
17
See note 1
See note 2

after
Emissions from well testing form part of the construction emissions which are now excluded from the project emissions, baseline and monitoring methodology
See note 2
Plant or countryspecific values to

calculate COEF are
preferred to IPCC
default values.
CDM Executive Board
page 26
Note 1: Flow rates

1a. Steam flow rate, power plant
The steam quantity discharged from the geothermal wells will be measured with a venturi flow meter (or other equipment with at least the same accuracy).
Measurement of temperature and pressure upstream of the venturi meter is required to define the steam properties. The calculation of steam quantities should
be conducted on a continuous basis and should be based on international standards. The measurement results should be summarized transparently in regular
production reports.
Note 2: Non-condensable gases in geothermal steam
Non-condensable gases (NCGs) in geothermal reservoirs usually consist mainly of CO2 and H2S. They also contain a small quantity of hydrocarbons,
including predominantly CH4. In geothermal power projects, NCGs flow with the steam into the power plant. In conventional vacuum condensing steam
cycle geothermal power plants, a small proportion of the CO2 is converted to carbonate / bicarbonate in the cooling water circuit. In addition, parts of the
NCGs are reinjected into the geothermal reservoir, if the facility practices reinjection of excess steam condensate. However, as a conservative approach, this
methodology assumes that all NCGs entering the power plant are discharged to atmosphere via the cooling tower or (in the case of a geothermal power plant
where the steam is condensed at a pressure above atmospheric, the NCGs are commonly vented to atmosphere from the condenser, unless they are collected
and reinjected into the geothermal reservoir).
NCG sampling should be carried out in production wells and 18at the steam field-power plant interface using ASTM Standard Practice E1675 for Sampling 2Phase Geothermal Fluid for Purposes of Chemical Analysis (as applicable to sampling single phase steam only). The CO2 and CH4 sampling and analysis
procedure consists of collecting NCG samples from the main steam line with glass flasks, filled with sodium hydroxide solution and additional chemicals to
prevent oxidation. Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2) dissolve in the solvent while the residual compounds remain in their gaseous phase.
The gas portion is then analyzed using gas chromatography to determine the content of the residuals including CH4. All alkanes concentrations are reported in
terms of methane. The NCG sampling and analysis should be performed at least once every four months.
D.2.1.2.
Description of formulae used to estimate project emissions (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units
of CO2 equ.)
The following emissions will be monitored:
18
Fugitive emissions of carbon dioxide and methane due to release of non-condensable gases from produced steam; and
Carbon dioxide emissions resulting from combustion of fossil fuels related to the operation of the geothermal power plant.
This is not necessary since fugitive emissions from wells on test or bleed are excluded in this methodology, refer Footnote 7 in ACM0002, Version 6
CDM Executive Board

a)
page 27
Fugitive carbon dioxide and methane emissions due to release of non-condensable gases from the produced steam (PESy):
PESy = (wmain,CO2 + wMain,CH4 GWPCH4 ) MS,y
where PESy are the project emissions due to release of carbon dioxide and methane from the produced steam during the year y, wMain,CO2 and wMain,CH4
are the average mass fractions of carbon dioxide and methane in the produced steam, GWPCH4 is the global warming potential of methane and MS,y is
the quantity of steam produced during the year y.
b)
Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion (PEFFy)

PEFFy =
i ,y
COEFi
where PEFFy are the project emissions from combustion of fossil fuels related to the operation of the geothermal power plant in tons of CO2, Fi,y is
the fuel consumption of fuel type i during the year y and COEFi is the CO2 emission factor coefficient of the fuel type i.
Total project emissions, PEy , are therefore equal to PESy + PEFFy.
D.2.1.3.
Relevant data necessary for determining the baseline of anthropogenic emissions by sources of GHGs within the
project boundary and how such data will be collected and archived :
Based on the Average OM method
ID number
(Please use
numbers to ease
cross-referencing
to table D.3)
1. EGy
Data
variable
Source of data
Electricity
quantity
Electricity
supplied to the
grid by the
project
Data unit
MWh
Measured
(m),
calculated (c),
estimated (e)
Recording
frequency
Hourly
measurement
and monthly
recording
Proportion
of data to
be
monitored
100%
How will
the data be
archived?
(electronic/
paper)
electronic
For how long is

archived data
kept?
Comment
During the
crediting period
and two years
after.
Electricity supplied by the

project activity to the grid.
Double check by receipt of
sales.
CDM Executive Board
page 28
D.2.1.3.
ID number
(Please use
numbers to ease
cross-referencing
to table D.3)
Data
variable
Source of data
Data unit
Measured
(m),
calculated (c),
estimated (e)
2. EFy
Baseline
emission
factor
CO2 emission
factor of the
grid
tCO2/MWh
3. EFOM,y
Operating
Margin
emission
factor
tCO2/MWh
4. EFBM,y
Build
Margin
emission
factor
Operating
Margin CO2
emission
factor of the
grid
Build Margin
CO2 emission
factor of the
grid
tCO2/MWh
Mass or
volume
m, e
5. Fi,j,y & i,k,y
19
Fuel
quantity
Amount of
fossil fuel
consumed by
each power
source per
plant, per fuel
type when
there is more
than one fuel
Recording
frequency
Yearly, for three

years most
recent data prior
to CDM
registration
Yearly, for three
years most
recent data prior
to CDM
registration
Yearly, for three
years most
recent data prior
to CDM
registration
Yearly, for three
years most
recent data prior
to CDM
registration
Proportion
of data to
be
monitored
100%
How will
the data be
archived?
(electronic/
paper)
electronic
100%
electronic
Calculated ex-ante as per

the Average Operating
Margin Emission Factor
method
100%
electronic
Calculated ex-ante as per

the Build Margin Emission
Factor method
100%
electronic
Either directly from the

power plants (including
IPPs), or from data
supplied by DJLPE19 or
DJGSDM for PLN plants
(either as actual fuel
consumed per plant for
coal, or lumped
consumption by fuel type
for oil and gas)
A description of the abbreviations used to identify the groups supplying data is given at the end of Annex 3
For how long is

archived data
kept?
Comment
Calculated as an ex-ante
weighted sum of the OM
and BM emission factors
CDM Executive Board
page 29
D.2.1.3.
Data
variable
Source of data
Data unit
Measured
(m),
calculated (c),
estimated (e)
Fuel
carbon
content
Weighted
annual carbon
content per
fuel type per
power plant
%C as
received
basis
m, e
6b.
COEFi,j,y & i,k,y
Emission
factor
coefficient
Country
specific data
published by
IPCC
tCO2/mass
or volume
unit
7.
GENi,j,y & i,k,y
Electricity
quantity
MWh
8.
Plant name
Text
Matches data in 7.
9.
Plant name
Electricity
generation of
each power
plant per fuel
type
Identification
of each power
plant for the
OM
Identification
of each power
plant for the
BM
Text
Matches data in 7, but adds

year of first operation.
ID number
(Please use
numbers to ease
cross-referencing
to table D.3)
6
CCi,j,y & i,k,y
Recording
frequency
Proportion
of data to
be
monitored
Yearly, for three

years most
recent data prior
to CDM
registration
100%
How will
the data be
archived?
(electronic/
paper)
electronic
Yearly, for five

years most
recent data prior
to CDM
registration
100%
electronic
For how long is

archived data
kept?
Comment
Directly from the power

plants (including IPPs), or
based on IPCC data for
Indonesia, or estimated if
this is more conservative
than using IPCC values
Refer to Revised 1996
IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse
Inventories: Reference
Manual. Chapter 1.
Data provided by PT PLN
(Persero), P3B (Grid
Manager), Settlement
Group
CDM Executive Board
page 30
D.2.1.3.
Data
variable
Source of data
Data unit
Measured
(m),
calculated (c),
estimated (e)
9a.
LowCost/Must-Run
Plant list
Text
m, e
10. y
Parameter
Identification
of whether
each power
plant is LowCost/Must
Run or not
Fraction of
time during
which lowcost/mustsources are on
the margin
The merit
order in which
power sources
are dispatched
ID number
(Please use
numbers to ease
cross-referencing
to table D.3)
11.
Merit
Order
Recording
frequency
Proportion
of data to
be
monitored
How will
the data be
archived?
(electronic/
paper)
For how long is

archived data
kept?
Comment
Yearly, for five

years most
recent data prior
to CDM
registration
Supplied by the power

plant operators, or assumed
by CGI if not supplied.
Required to prove that the
Average OM EF method
can be applied
Not applicable. This data is not available for the JAMALI grid. This data is only required for the simple adjusted
operating margin which is not applied in this project.
Not applicable. This data is not available for the JAMALI grid. This data is only required for the dispatch analysis which
is not applied in this project.
11a.
GENi,j,y & i,k,y
IMPORTS
Not applicable because there are no imports on the JAMALI Grid
11b.
COEFi,j,y & i,k,y
IMPORTS
Not applicable because there are no imports on the JAMALI Grid
CDM Executive Board

D.2.1.4.
page 31
Description of formulae used to estimate baseline emissions (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units
of CO2 equ.)
As per ACM0002 (Version 6): A baseline emission factor (EFy) is calculated as a combined margin (CM), consisting of the combination of operating margin
(OM) and build margin (BM) factors according to the following three steps. Calculations for this combined margin must be based on data from an official
source (where available) and made publicly available.
STEP 1. Calculate the Operating Margin emission factor(s) (EFOM,y) based on one of the four following methods:
Per ACM0002, the Operating Margin emission factor (EFOM,y) can be based on one of the four following methods:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Simple OM, (SOM) or

Simple adjusted OM (SAOM), or
Dispatch Data Analysis OM (DDOM), or
Average OM (AOM).
Dispatch data analysis should be the first methodological choice. Where this option is not selected project participants shall justify why and may use the
simple OM, the simple adjusted OM or the average emission rate method taking into account the provisions outlined hereafter.
The Simple OM method (a) can only be used where low-cost/must run resources3 constitute less than 50% of total grid generation in: 1) average of the five
most recent years, or 2) based on long-term normals for hydroelectricity production.
The average emission rate method (d) can only be used
where low-cost/must run resources constitute more than 50% of total grid generation and detailed data to apply option (b) is not available, and
where detailed data to apply option (c) above is unavailable.
The JAMALI grid is complex. It includes more than 200 individual electric generators, driven by a variety of turbines, themselves driven by a variety of
energy sources.
For the operating margin, data is not publicly available with which to calculate this margin using the dispatch data analysis method. The choice thus narrows
to the Simple or Average OM. CGI was able to show (see later) that low-cost/must run resources constituted more than 50% of total grid generation in the
five most recent years and therefore that the Average OM could be applied. ACM0002 (Version 6) defines the Average Operating Margin (OM) emission
factor (EFOM,average,y) as:
CDM Executive Board
page 32
the average emission rate of all power plants, using equation (1)*, but including low-operating cost and must-run power plants. Either of the two
data vintages described for the simple OM (a) may be used.
(*In fact, the correct reference should be to equation (2) in ACM0002 (Version 6), which is:)
EFOM,y =
i, j, y
COEFi , j
i, j
/ GEN
j,y
where Fi,j,y is the amount of fuel i (in a mass or volume unit) consumed by relevant power sources j in year(s) y,
j refers to the power sources delivering electricity to the grid, including low-operating cost and must-run power plants, and including imports to the
grid,
COEFi,j,y (not simply COEFi,j as shown in equation (2)) is the CO2 emission coefficient of fuel i (tCO2 / mass or volume unit of the fuel), taking into
account the carbon content of the fuels used by relevant power sources j and the percent oxidation of the fuel in year(s) y, and
GENj,y is the electricity (MWh) delivered to the grid by source j in year(s) y20.
The CO2 emission coefficient COEFi is obtained as:
COEFi = NCViEFCO2,iOXIDi
where:
NCVi is the net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel i,
OXIDi is the oxidation factor of the fuel (see page 1.29 in the 1996 Revised IPCC Guidelines for default values),
EFCO2,i is the CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i.
Where available, local values of NCVi and EFCO2,i should be used. If no such values are available, country-specific values (see e.g. IPCC Good
Practice Guidance) are preferable to IPCC world-wide default values.
The Simple OM emission factor can be calculated using either of the two following data vintages for years(s) y:
A 3-year average, based on the most recent statistics available at the time of PDD submission, or (<< this option chosen by CGI)
The year in which project generation occurs, if EFOM average,y is updated based on ex post monitoring.
20
Underlined text added for completeness
CDM Executive Board
page 33
Data was sought from official sources in order to calculate the operating and build margins for the JAMALI grid. Several approaches were made to
generators and the national dispatch center. Several meetings were held with stakeholders through 2005 and 2006 at which the data requirements for
ACM0002 were described and discussed. These meetings were called by the government body which had been appointed (by the Minister of the
Environment) as the CDM Focal Point for renewable electricity projects, namely the Sub-Directorate of New Energy and Energy Conservation within the
Directorate of Electricity and Energy Utilization (DJLPE) of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. The stakeholders included:
Ministry of the Environment

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
Non Governmental Organisations
PT Pertamina (Persero)
PT PLN (Persero) (Pusat, P3B)
PLN generating companies (PTPJB, PTIP)
IPPs (coal and geothermal)
The following data was supplied from various sources for the JAMALI grid:
The electricity dispatched onto the JAMALI grid by each generating unit for the 5 years 2000-2004, and information as to the type of power plant (from
the PLN Dispatch Center; P3B)
Fuel consumed by power plants operated by PTPJB for years 1999-2004 (from PTPJB)
Year of first operation for all power plants operated by PTIP and of the fossil fuel power plants of PTPJB (from PTIP and PTPJB)
Low cost / Must Run status of PTPJBs thermal power plants
Coal consumed by Paiton Energy Company (2002-2004), analyses of coals used plus the mix ratio of these coals
Coal consumed by Jawa Power Company (2003-2004), analyses of coals used plus the mix ratio of these coals
PTIPs design coal specification for the Suralaya Power Station, plus some analyses of typical coals supplied to Suralaya
DJLPE annual Indonesia statistics on electricity and energy for 2000-2004 (including lumped values for electricity generated and fuel consumed by PLN
and electricity purchased by PLN from IPPs)
DJGSDM annual Indonesia statistics on minerals and coal for 2004 (including the quantities of coal consumed by domestic coal users for electricity
production 2003-2004)
Actual non-condensable gas contents and steam consumption data for Darajat Unit II, Gunung Salak Units 1-6, and estimated values for Wayang Windu
geothermal power plants.
CDM Executive Board
page 34
Based on the data received as detailed above, for fossil fuel fired power plants, CGI calculated the mass CO2 emissions (the numerator in the equation for
EFOM above) of each fossil fuel fired generating unit on the JAMALI grid as below. Where information was missing from the above data sets, CGI made
assumptions or used IPCC default values (Indonesia-specific where available) in order to calculate the mass emissions. Items [1] through [5] below define the
hierarchical approach used by CGI where CO2 mass emissions were calculated for each generator based on the type of generator and the actual quantity and
actual carbon content of the fuel consumed, if any, and if known. When one or either of these two parameters was not available, the next most rigorous
source of information was applied, with [1] being the most rigorous, and [5] being the least rigorous.
[1]
When actual fuel consumption was given by the generator or was available from DJGSDM data and the actual carbon content of the fuel used by a
specific generator was either known or could be estimated [applies to Paiton PTPJB, Paiton IPP (PEC:2002-2004, JP:2003-2004) and PTIP Suralaya
(2003-2004) coal plants]
CO2 emissions =
[2]
When actual fuel consumption was not given by the generator but a generator-specific fuel consumption for subsequent years was available from
DJGSDM or IPP fuel data together with P3B generation data and the actual carbon content of the fuel used by a specific generator could be estimated
[applies to PTIP and IPP coal plants not included in [1]]
CO2 emissions =
[3]
lumped specific fuel consumption/MWh x estimated carbon content [converted to mass carbon per unit of fuel
consumed] x IPCC oxidation factor x 44/12 x total MWh dispatched by generator (refer Annex 3, Table 6.4)
When fuel consumption by a specific generator was known and actual carbon content of fuel was not known [applies to PTPJB oil and gas plants]
CO2 emissions =
[4]
fuel consumed x actual (or estimated) carbon content [converted to mass carbon per unit of fuel consumed] x IPCC
oxidation factor x 44/12 (refer Annex 3, Table 6.4)
fuel consumed x IPCC Indonesia-specific default carbon content [converted to mass carbon per unit of fuel consumed]
x IPCC oxidation factor x 44/12 (refer Annex 3, Table 6.2)
When actual fuel consumption was not given by the generator but a lumped value was available from DJLPE statistics and actual carbon content of
fuel was not known [applies to PTIP and IPP steam oil plants and PTIP open cycle gas turbine oil fired plants]
CO2 emissions =
lumped specific fuel consumption/MWh x IPCC Indonesia-specific default carbon content [converted to mass carbon
per unit of fuel consumed] x IPCC oxidation factor x 44/12 x total MWh dispatched by generator (refer Annex 3, Table
6.3)
CDM Executive Board

[5]
page 35
When fuel consumption by generator type or by generator was not known and actual carbon content of fuel was not known [applies to PTIP open
cycle gas turbine and IPP combined cycle gas turbine plants]
CO2 emissions =
IPCC Reference Indonesia-specific Fuel-specific Carbon Emission Factor x 44/12 x IPCC oxidation factor x industrytypical heat rate x total MWh dispatched by generator (refer Annex 3, Table 6.5)
Other required assumptions related to fossil fuel combustion were:

[6]
When a liquid fuel was combusted in a gas turbine, but the type of liquid fuel was not known, it was assumed to be gas/diesel oil per IPCC. When a
liquid fuel was combusted in an oil fired boiler, but the type of liquid fuel was not known, it was assumed to be crude oil per IPCC (refer Annex 3,
Table 6.1).
[7]
Industry-typical heat rates were selected based on typical values for new plant (refer Annex 3, Table 6.5).
Mass CO2 emissions from non-fossil fuel power plants were calculated as:
[8]
When geothermal CO2 emissions per MWh were not known [applies to all geothermal plants except Darajat, Gunung Salak and Wayang Windu, for
which actual or approximate actual non-condensable gas concentrations and specific steam consumptions were known and thus for which
plant-specific CO2 emissions could be calculated]
CO2 emissions =
[9]
Darajat Unit III emissions/MWh x total MWh dispatched by generator (refer Annex 3, Table 10)
For a hydro-electric power plant or a steam turbine in a combined cycle power plant
CO2 emissions =
Other data received, and assumptions made in its absence were:

[10]
Year of first operation (required for Build Margin)

This was either as provided by the generators or, if the generators did not provide data, assumed by CGI based on information available to CGI
(PTPJB and PTIP provided most of this data for their plants (refer Annex 3, Tables A7 & A8)). The data were presented by year and were not further
differentiated by month so if more than one generator came on line in a year, and any one of these generators tipped the 20% required for Build
Margin, all generators which came on line in that year were included in the Build Margin calculation.
CDM Executive Board

[11]
page 36
Low-cost/Must-run (Yes or No for each generating source)

This was either as provided by PTPJB (refer Annex 3, Table A6) or assumed by CGI on the following basis:
All hydro-electric plants are Yes as they are low cost
All IPPs are Yes because they are Must Run (Take or Pay)
All non-IPP coal plants are Yes because they are either Low Cost or Must Run or both
All PTIP thermal plants, excluding Suralaya, are No
All PTIP geothermal plants are Yes.
Based on the data in [11] above and the assumptions made by CGI, Low-Cost/Must-Run sources constituted more than 50% of the generation on the JAMALI
grid in each of the years 2000-2004, the five most recent years for which some generation data is available (refer Annex 3, Table 8). This precluded the use
of the Simple Operating Margin and the Average Operating Margin Emission Factor was calculated instead.
Note that, for coal, use of the actual as-received carbon content and fuel consumption results in power plant specific CO2 emission values which are 6-11%
lower (i.e more conservative) than would have been calculated if only IPCC values were used (1.90-2.00 tCO2equ/t (as-received coal) [Table 6.4] vs 2.13
[Table 6.1]).
In order to illustrate that the hierarchical approach described above leads to a conservative estimation of the baseline emission factor, consider the following
distribution of results for the Average Operating margin calculation from the year 2004:
Category
[9]
[1]
[2]
[3]
[8]
[4]
[5]
CO2 Emitter
None (hydro)
Coal
Coal
Oil & Gas
Geothermal
Oil & Gas
Oil & Gas
Hierarchical Data Ranking* % of total MWh

Highest
14%
48%
0% **
17%
7% ***
14%
Lowest
1%
Highest means CO2 emissions are calculated based on the least number of assumptions (i.e. they are expected to be closest to the real values), lowest
means the calculations are based entirely on IPCC default values
** Not used in 2004
*** Actual emissions are known for approximately 50% of the geothermal generation, hence this is placed midway in the ranking
CDM Executive Board
page 37
This table shows that the higher ranked data ([9] & [1]) are a significant component of the calculation (more than 60% of the total generation), which supports
the claim that this is a conservative approach (since use of the highest ranked data features strongly in the baseline emission factor calculation and it is
associated with lower emissions than use of the IPCC default values).
The ranking of the inputs to the Build Margin, although not shown directly here, is even more significant due to the preponderance of coal (>80% of MWh)
in the Build Margin calculation for 2004. Thus this hierarchical approach, which places coal at highest equal data ranking, strengthens the argument that the
approach taken is conservative for both Operating Margin and Build Margin (because coal has the highest impact on the baseline calculation). It should be
noted that the coal carbon contents used here are based on only a few data points. Nevertheless, as these are deemed to be representative, and their use leads
to a conservative result, their use is appropriate.
For each JAMALI generator a total emission value in tCO2 was calculated for each year 2002-2004. The Average Operating Margin Emission Factor
(EFOM,average, y), in tCO2equ/MWh, is the sum of the carbon dioxide emissions of all generators for the years 2002-2003 in tonnes, divided by the sum of all
electricity dispatched onto the JAMALI gird for the same period in MWh.
The actual calculation is presented in Annex 3, Table 8. The value of the Average Operating Margin Emission Factor so calculated is 0.685 tCO2equ/MWh.
STEP 2. Calculate the Build Margin emission factor (EFBM,y) as the generation-weighted average emission factor (tCO2equ/MWh) of a sample of power
plants m, as follows:
EFBM,y =
i ,m , y
i ,m
COEFi ,m
/ GEN
m,y
where Fi,m,y, COEFi,m and GENm,y are analogous to the variables described for the simple OM method above for plants m21.
ACM0002 permits two options:
Option 1. Calculate the Build Margin emission factor EFBM,y ex ante based on the most recent information available on plants already built for sample
group m at the time of PDD submission. The sample group m consists of either
the five power plants that have been built most recently, or
the power plants capacity additions in the electricity system that comprise 20% of the system generation (in MWh) and that have been built most recently.
Project participants should use from these two options that sample group that comprises the larger annual generation. If 20% falls on part capacity of a
plant, that plant is fully included in the calculation.
21
The bold font is used to indicate wording which supports use of the three year data vintage (refer to the OM definitions), in the BM calculation
CDM Executive Board
page 38
Option 2. For the first crediting period, the Build Margin emission factor EFBM,y must be updated annually ex post for the year in which actual project
generation and associated emissions reductions occur. For subsequent crediting periods, EFBM,y should be calculated ex-ante, as described in option 1
above. The sample group m consists of either
the five power plants that have been built most recently, or
the power plants capacity additions in the electricity system that comprise 20% of the system generation (in MWh) and that have been built most recently.
Project participants should use from these two options that sample group that comprises the larger annual generation. If 20% falls on part capacity of a
plant, that plant is fully included in the calculation.
CGI has chosen Option 1. The data required to calculate the value of the Build Margin Emission Factor is a sub-set of the data points used to calculate the
Average Operating Margin Emission Factor. To choose the sub-set (m) of data points, in each of the three years 2002, 2003 and 2004, the most recent plants
are selected to achieve the 20% criteria in the year 2004. The same set of plants which meets this criterion in 2004 is fixed and selected again for both 2003
and 2004. Developing the Build Margin Emission Factor based on three years provides a representative sample of capacity additions on the grid and follows
the methodology which states that the sub-set (m) of data points as defined in the Simple Adjusted Operating Margin should be used. ACM0002 is not 100%
clear regarding how many years of data should be applied to calculate the Build Margin. Alternatives to the position taken here would be (1) use only the
most recent data (2004), or (2) calculate the set of plants meeting the criteria in 2002, 2003 and 2004, and in each of these years choose the set of plants
which meets the criteria in that year (this could result in three different sets of plants, with overlap). The Build Margin was calculated according to the three
different alternatives. The chosen alternative was the most conservative (i.e. it gave the lowest value for the Build Margin).
The Build Margin Emission Factor (EFBM,y), in tCO2equ/MWh, is the sum of the carbon dioxide emissions in 2002, 2003 and 20004 of the set of mi
generators selected for the year i =2004, in tonnes, divided by the sum of all electricity dispatched onto the JAMALI grid for the same three year period in
MWh by this set of generators. The actual calculation is presented in Annex 3, Table 8. The value of the Build Margin Emission Factor so calculated is
0.772 tCO2equ/MWh.
STEP 3. Calculate the baseline emission factor EFy as the weighted average of the Operating Margin Emission Factor (EFOM,y) and the Build Margin
Emission Factor (EFBM,y):
EFy
wOM EFOM,y + wBM EFBM,y
where the weights wOM and wBM are 50% (i.e., wOM = wBM = 0.5), and EFOM,y and EFBM,y are calculated as described in Steps 1 and 2 above and are expressed
in tCO2equ/MWh.
The value of the JAMALI Baseline Emission Factor so calculated is 0.728 tCO2equ/MWh. The application of ACM0002 to calculate this value was reviewed
by the JAMALI Baseline Emission Factor stakeholders and acknowledged by them on 17 April 2006. This was officially submitted as the JAMALI Baseline
Emission Factor by the Director General of Electricity and Energy Utilization, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, to the Chairperson of the
Designated National Authority of Indonesia on 28 April 2006 (Refer Annex 3, Attachment 3.1).
CDM Executive Board
page 39
D. 2.2. Option 2: Direct monitoring of emission reductions from the project activity (values should be consistent with those in section E).
Option 2 is not applied.
D.2.2.1.
ID number
(Please use
numbers to ease
crossreferencing to
table D.3)
Data
variable
D.2.2.2.
Data to be collected in order to monitor emissions from the project activity, and how this data will be archived:
Source
of data
Data
unit
Measured (m),
calculated (c),
estimated (e),
Recording
frequency
Proportion
of data to
be
monitored
How will the data

be archived?
(electronic/
paper)
Comment
Description of formulae used to calculate project emissions (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units
of CO2 equ.):
Option 2 is not applied.
D.2.3. Treatment of leakage in the monitoring plan
D.2.3.1.
If applicable, please describe the data and information that will be collected in order to monitor leakage effects of the
project activity
ID number
(Please use
numbers to
ease crossreferencing to
table D.3)
21. EGyI,
EGyII
Data
variable
Source of data
Data
unit
Measured (m),
calculated (c) or
estimated (e)
Recording
frequency
Proportion
of data to be
monitored
How will the data

be archived?
(electronic/ paper)
Comment
Electricity
quantity
Electricity supplied to
the grid by Unit I and
Unit II
MWh
(m)
hourly
100%
Electronic &
paper
A daily log will also be kept for each of

these units. The reason(s) for any average
daily dispatch less than 90% of the
nameplate rating will be noted in the logs.
CDM Executive Board
page 40
D.2.3. Treatment of leakage in the monitoring plan

D.2.3.1.
If applicable, please describe the data and information that will be collected in order to monitor leakage effects of the
project activity
22. 5YrEGyI,
5YrEGyII
Electricity
quantity
D.2.3.2.
5 Year historical
average electricity
supplied to the grid
by Unit I and Unit II,
based on nameplate
ratings
MWh
(m)
hourly
100%
Electronic &
paper
Description of formulae used to estimate leakage (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units of CO2
equ.)
As per ACM0002: The main emissions potentially giving rise to leakage in the context of electric sector projects are emissions arising due to activities such
as power plant construction, fuel handling (extraction, processing, and transport), and land inundation. Project participants do not need to consider these
emission sources as leakage in applying this methodology. Project activities using this baseline methodology shall not claim any credit for the project on
account of reducing these emissions below the level of the baseline scenario.
Reductions in output from Darajat Units I and II may occur for several reasons: maintenance schedule, changes in the system power factor, equipment failure,
natural decline in the reservoir, management decisions and the existence of the project activity. Any reductions in electricity supplied to the grid from Darajat
Unit I or Unit II that are attributable to the project activity would be leakage. The quantity of electricity supplied to the grid from Darajat Unit I and Unit II
(as referenced in table D.3.) will be compared against five year historic average levels. Deviations from historic average electricity supplied will be evaluated
to determine if they are attributable to the project activity. Leakage MWh is the reduction in electricity supplied from Darajat Units I & II attributable to the
project activity. For the purpose of calculating emissions reductions by the project activity, leakage MWh from Darajat Unit I and Unit II will be deducted
from the total MWh supplied to the grid by the project activity.
D.2.4. Description of formulae used to estimate emission reductions for the project activity (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm,
emissions units of CO2 equ.)
The project activity mainly reduces carbon dioxide through substitution of grid electricity generation with fossil fuel fired power plants by renewable
electricity. The emission reduction ERy by the project activity during a given year y is the difference between the baseline emissions (BEy), project emissions
(PEy) and emissions due to leakage (Ly), as follows:
ERy = BEy - PEy - Ly
CDM Executive Board
page 41
Where the baseline emissions (BEy in metric tons CO2) is the product of the baseline emissions factor (EFy in tCO2equ/MWh, calculated in Step 3), times the
electricity supplied by the project activity to the grid (EGy in MWh):
BEy = EGy EFy
For this geothermal project activity project participants shall account for the following emissions sources22, as applicable:
Fugitive emissions of carbon dioxide due to release of non-condensable gases from produced steam; and
Carbon dioxide resulting from combustion emissions of fossil fuels related to the operation of the geothermal power plant.
D.3.
Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures are being undertaken for data monitored
Data
(Indicate table and
ID number e.g. 3.-1.;
3.2.)
D.2.1.3
Uncertainty level of data

(High/Medium/Low)
Low
Revenue quality metering, but requires routine calibration to meet the requirements of the electricity sales
agreement.
Medium
These are calculated based on data supplied under D.2.1.3 items 5, 6, and 7. Where data under item 5 and 6 is not
directly available, values are calculated in the manner described in Section D.2.1.4.
1. EGy
D.2.1.3
2. EFy & 3. EFOM,y &

4. EFBM,y
D.2.1.3
5. Fi,j,y & i,k,y
D.2.1.3
6. CCi,j,y & i,k,y
D.2.1.3
6b. COEFi,j,y & i,k,y
D.2.1.3
7. GENi,j,y & i,k,y
22
Explain QA/QC procedures planned for these data, or why such procedures are not necessary.
Low
Medium
The fuel consumption data, where available, is cross-checkable with data reported by DJLPE and DJGSDM.
The fuel carbon content data for coal is based on analyses of the different coals combusted in the different coal
fired power plants. IPCC default values resulted in higher carbon contents than what are actually used so this
approach is conservative.
Low
For oil and gas, the IPCC default values are used, converted to the volume units reported in Indonesia.
Low
Provided by the grid operator. This is based on the metering provided at the electricity export point of each
generator. Generally it will be revenue quality metering, which will require routine calibration to meet the
requirements of the electricity sales agreement between the generator owner and the grid operator.
As per ACM0002 fugitive carbon dioxide and methane emissions due to well testing and well bleeding are not considered as they are negligible.
CDM Executive Board

D.3.
page 42
Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures are being undertaken for data monitored
Data
(Indicate table and
ID number e.g. 3.-1.;
3.2.)
D.2.1.3
9 (Year)
Uncertainty level of data

(High/Medium/Low)
Explain QA/QC procedures planned for these data, or why such procedures are not necessary.
Low
This is the data for year of first operation. Some data was supplied by power plant owners, other data assumed by
Project Proponent based on a literature search. For plants constructed before approximately 1996, the year of
first operation does not affect the calculation.
Low
This is the data for whether a plant is low cost/must run or not. Some was data supplied by power plant owners,
other data is assumed by the Project Proponent based on assumptions described in Section D.2.1.4.
D.2.1.1
12. MS,y
Low
The venturi meter is a physical device and the only checking required is the occasional inspection of the internal
dimensions to ensure that wear has not taken place. Routine calibration/checking of the primary measurement
elements (differential pressure transmitter, absolute upstream pressure transmitter and thermocouple) will be
undertaken to ensure that the measurement system is working correctly.
D.2.1.1
13.wMain,CO2
Low
QA/QC procedures cover all aspects of this data including preparation of solutes and titrants, the method of
sampling, the laboratory measurement of dissolved species and condensed steam and the laboratory measurement
of residual quantity and composition.
D.2.1.1
14.wMain,CH4
Low
QA/QC procedures cover all aspects of this data including preparation of solutes and titrants, the method of
sampling, the laboratory measurement of dissolved species and condensed steam and the laboratory measurement
of residual quantity and composition.
D.2.1.1
18. Fi,y
Low
Logging of the fuel used in the project for diesel driven fire pump, diesel driven standby generator and fuels used
in the project vehicle fleet is required for accounting purposes and is therefore captured quite accurately.
D.2.3.1
21. EGyI, EGyII
Low
Revenue quality metering, routinely calibrated to meet the requirements of the electricity sales agreement for
Darajat Unit I and II.
D.2.3.1
22.
5YrEGyI, 5YrEGyII
Low
Revenue quality metering, routinely calibrated to meet the requirements of the electricity sales agreement for
Darajat Unit I and II.
D.2.1.3
9a
(Low Cost/Must Run)
The data used to calculate the combined margin emission factor for the Java-Madura-Bali (JAMALI) interconnected electricity grid has been gathered from a
variety of sources. In the case of data from an official source the quality of this data is accepted on an as-is basis. In some cases it has been possible to
compare the same data from more than one source. Wherever there was a choice, the data which was selected was that which resulted in a more conservative
value for the emission factor (e.g. the use of actual coal carbon content rather than IPCC default values).
CDM Executive Board
page 43
D.4
Please describe the operational and management structure that the project operator will implement in order to monitor emission reductions
and any leakage effects, generated by the project activity
Chevron's efforts to manage and reduce greenhouse gas emissions are built upon the enterprise-wide SANGEA energy and emissions estimating system.
The company began development of the system in 2000 and completed its implementation in 2002. The SANGEA system allows Chevron to account for
and report all known sources of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions, and to estimate energy and fuel use in a comprehensive, systematic
manner.
Chevron also established its first greenhouse gas emissions inventory protocol, which was updated on February 17, 2004, and provides guidelines, sets
boundaries and establishes scope for what to report. It also defines emissions accounting principles and specific terminology for greenhouse gas emissions
accounting and reporting. Together, the Protocol and the SANGEA system form the foundation for greenhouse gas emissions management throughout
Chevron.
Reductions in output from Darajat Units I and II may occur for several reasons: maintenance schedule, changes in the system power factor, equipment failure,
natural decline in the reservoir, management decisions and the existence of the project activity. Any reductions in electricity supplied to the grid from Darajat
Unit I or Unit II that are attributable to the project activity would be leakage. The quantity of electricity supplied to the grid from Darajat Unit I and Unit II
(as referenced in table D.3.) will be compared against five year historic average levels. Deviations from historic average electricity supplied will be evaluated
to determine if they are attributable to the project activity. Leakage MWh is the reduction in electricity supplied from Darajat Units I & II attributable to the
project activity. For the purpose of calculating emissions reductions by the project activity, leakage MWh from Darajat Unit I and Unit II will be deducted
from the total MWh supplied to the grid by the project activity.
The emission reductions from Darajat Unit III are calculated from the product of the combined margin emission factor and the electricity dispatched by
Darajat Unit III, less any CO2equ emissions from the Darajat Unit III project (from CO2 and CH4 in the steam supplied to the project), less any leakage as per
previous paragraph.
Additional to the SANGEA energy and emissions estimating system, CGI will prepare a Monitoring Plan for Emissions Reductions from the Darajat Unit
III Project prior to the commencement of generation of emissions reductions. This will define what variables are to be monitored, how frequently they will be
monitored, how the quality of the variable data gathered will be checked and maintained and archived, and who (within the CGI organization) will be
responsible for the implementation and routine management, reporting and auditing of the ongoing Monitoring Plan. This process will assure the accuracy
and validity of the emissions reductions calculated on a regular basis and submitted to the DOE for CERs Certification.
As mentioned in D2.1, CO2 and CH4 in the steam supplied to the project will be monitored through regular sampling of the steam supplied to the project, as
defined in the Monitoring Plan. The calculation of mass of CO2 and CH4 in the steam supplied to the project involves two main variables: steam flow and
CDM Executive Board
page 44
CO2 and CH4 concentration in the steam flow. Steam flow is measured continuously and stored in a database. The process variables required to measure
steam flow are steam temperature, steam pressure and differential pressure across the venturi flow meter. These parameters are recorded continuously and the
primary elements will be checked and calibrated based on a frequency defined in the Monitoring Plan. Calibration will be carried out by the Darajat Unit III
instrument technicians following a procedure, and to a frequency which will be included in the Monitoring Plan. The CO2 and CH4 concentration in the
steam flow will be analysed from samples taken from the steam line supplying steam to Unit III at the frequency defined in the Monitoring Plan. Such
samples will be obtained using ASTM method E 1675 referred to in ACM0002 and analysed in an accredited laboratory for the constituents of interest, CO2
and CH4 (and CO will be analyzed for as long as it takes to confirm the assumption that this is not present). At each sampling, duplicate samples will be taken
and both will be analysed. If the analysis results of the duplicate samples vary by more than 10%, further samples will be taken until agreement is obtained
within 10%.
To monitor potential leakage associated with Darajat Units I and II, the Monitoring Plan will call for the routine logging of the status of Darajat Units I & II,
as well as the electricity generated by Darajat Unit I & II. The reason for any reduction in gross output more than 10% below the nameplate rating of the unit
will be noted in the log. Whenever the annual output of Darajat Unit I or II is below five year historic average levels (based on nameplate ratings), the unit
log will be examined to determine whether or not the reduction in output is attributable to Darajat Unit III.
The Monitoring Plan will call for review and confirmation that the electrical energy dispatch meters associated with Darajat Units I, II and III are routinely
calibrated. Regular calibration is required by the Electricity Sales Contract covering these three units, and the purpose of the Monitoring Plan will be to focus
regularly on ensuring that this does happen.
D.5
Name of person/entity determining the monitoring methodology:
Mr. Maher Sungkar

Chevron Geothermal Indonesia
Sentral Senayan I
Jakarta 10270
INDONESIA
OE/HES Manager
Ph.:
+62 21 5798 4278
Fax.: +62 21 5798 4477
Email: mahersk@chevron.com
CDM Executive Board
page 45
SECTION E. Estimation of GHG emissions by sources

E.1.
Estimate of GHG emissions by sources:
Greenhouse gas emissions from the Darajat Unit II plant during 2004 have been estimated by CGI at
23,903 tonnes of CO2equ, based on monthly steam production rates and periodic sampling and analysis of
the non-condensable gases contained in the geothermal steam. This information shows that all noncondensable gases (in aggregate) constituted just 0.53% (weight basis) of the steam processed by the
plant (Refer Annex 3, Table 10).
During 2004, Unit II dispatched 793 GWh of electricity (Refer Annex 3, Table 8). In combination with
the estimated emissions presented above, these data indicate an emission factor for 2004 of 30.14 kg
CO2equ/MWh.
Estimation of the CO2 emissions from the proposed Darajat Unit III Project is based on a generation
capacity of 110 MW gross, an average capacity factor over the first seven years crediting period of 93.5%
(resulting in an annual average gross generation of 900,966 MWh) and the emission factor of
0.03014 tonne CO2equ/MWh derived from Darajat Unit II emission records. Hence, the average annual
CO2equ emissions from the proposed Darajat Unit III Project are estimated as:
900,966 MWh generation output x 0.03014 tonne CO2equ/MWh = 27,155 tonnes CO2equ/year
E.2.
Estimated leakage:
Leakage emissions are expected to be zero.

E.3.
The sum of E.1 and E.2 representing the project activity emissions:
The sum of E.1 and E.2 is estimated to be approximately: 27,155 tonnes CO2equ per year.
E.4.
Estimated anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases of the baseline:
The baseline emissions (BEy in metric tons CO2) are the product of the baseline emissions factor (EFy in
tCO2equ/MWh, calculated in Step 3), times the electricity supplied by the project activity to the grid (EGy
in MWh):
BEy = EGy EFy
Where
EGy = 900,966 MWh/annum
EFy = 0.728 tonnes CO2equ/MWh
The estimated gross annual baseline emissions are = 655,903 tonnes CO2equ.
E.5.
Difference between E.4 and E.3 representing the emission reductions of the project activity:
The emissions reductions ERy by the project activity during a given year y is the difference between the
baseline emissions (BEy), project emissions (PEy) and emissions due to leakage (Ly), as follows:
ERy = BEy - PEy - Ly
The emissions reductions are expected to be 628,748 tonnes CO2equ/annum.
CDM Executive Board

E.6.
page 46
Table providing values obtained when applying formulae above:
Table E.6. Emissions Reductions

Year
Annual
First crediting
period (7 years)
Estimation of
project activity
emissions (tonnes
CO2equ)
27,155
Estimation of
baseline
emissions (tonnes
CO2equ)
655,903
Estimation of
leakage (tonnes
CO2equ)
0
Estimation of
emissions
reductions
(tonnes CO2equ)
628,748
190,085
4,591,321
4,401,236
CDM Executive Board
page 47
SECTION F. Environmental impacts

F.1.
Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including transboundary impacts:
The proposed Darajat Unit III Project is designed to contribute to the supply of electricity in the JAMALI
Interconnected Grid system and generate electricity from clean and environmentally-friendly resources.
The plant will be located in Garut, West Java adjacent to the existing Darajat Unit II plant and will utilize
existing transmission lines, steam lines, and wells. There will be little added environmental impact to the
existing plant site and infrastructure. In the steam field, three existing outlying wells will be connected
by two steam pipelines to the existing steam system supplying Unit II. There will be some environmental
effect due to construction but this will be minimised and is covered by existing Environmental
Management and Monitoring Guidelines already approved for the project.
The development activities will consist of three activity phases, namely construction, operational, and
post operational phases.
An Environmental Impact Assessment prepared for the facility predicted a number of impacts which are
outlined below. There were several areas where the facility was expected to have impacts, potentially
affecting the physiography and geology, hydrology and water quality, land space and soil, flora and
fauna, and air quality of the site. These impacts would be due to: 1) land clearing and preparation and
drilling of production wells during the construction phase (there are no new wells for Unit III), 2) plant
operation, including make-up production and reinjection wells and 3) the post-operational or
decommissioning phase.
Based on these predictions, these impacts were mitigated through
implementation of an Environmental Management and Monitoring Guideline which is regularly reported
to the Government environmental body.
Mitigation Measures: The purpose of an Environmental Management and Monitoring Guideline is to
limit the negative significant impacts while increasing the positive impacts.
A technological approach is required in handling/minimizing negative impacts caused by development
activities of geothermal steam field during construction, operational, and post operational phases. The
technological approach previously used to minimize negative impacts for Darajat Units I & II, and which
will be used for Darajat Unit III where applicable, is as follows:
Avoiding slope cutting that will increase local slope angle beyond 50%, cascade, drainage, and
revegetation on original soil. These measures are conducted to prevent the possibility of erosion
caused by changes in land form.
Using directional drilling method to minimize land use
Construction of rain drainage with a slight slope. Construction of cascade in the channel system and
conduct a routine cleaning and construct an over flow equipped with a water gate.
Maintenance of standby diesel generator machinery according to the applied standard to ensure
normal condition that can minimize impacts on air quality, especially during the operational phase.
Utilization of silencer to reduce noise intensity caused by drilling and well production testing
activities.
Conduct management of drilling waste for both liquid and solid waste. Wastewater from drilling,
after sedimentation, will be reused for drilling, while drilling sludge and cutting wells settled must be
further handled.
Maintenance of condensate wastewater reinjection system.
Addition of traffic signs at traffic jam and main accident sensitive locations, especially at access roads
leading to the project site. Execution must be coordinated with related institutions to avoid traffic
jams and accidents.
Reforestation of project area during post operational phase will recover land fertility through top soil
richening will also reduce the occurrence of soil erosion and it is expected to recover until a permitted
level of erosion.
CDM Executive Board
page 48
F.2.
If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host
Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental
impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party:
The new Unit III will be located adjacent to the Darajat Unit II plant and will utilize existing transmission
lines and wells. This part of the project will therefore have little added environmental impact to the
existing plant site and infrastructure. Three existing outlying wells will be connected by two steam
pipelines to the existing steam system supplying Unit II which will also be used to supply steam to Unit
III.
The incremental environmental impacts of the proposed Darajat Unit III Project are expected to be minor
and mitigated through implementation of an Environmental Management and Monitoring Guideline
which is regularly reported to the Government environmental body.
Construction Phase by placing the new power plant unit adjacent to the existing Darajat Unit II
plant and utilizing the existing infrastructure there will be negligible environmental impacts on the
hydrology and water quality and aquatic biota. Measures include: ensure that work opportunities for
the local citizens are maximized and that there is regular supervision of workers; prevent land
subsidence caused by land clearing; anticipate the possibility of erosion and sedimentation caused by
land clearing; reduce erosion of land surface and anticipate the deterioration of surface water quality;
identify negative impacts on vegetation; identify success level of management on water quality;
monitor the level of noise intensity and assure that the rock muffler is properly functioning; identify
community changes especially changes in species composition, species diversity and fauna
population; detect changes in groundwater quality.
Land Clearing and Preparation the proposed Darajat Unit III power plant will be located adjacent to
the existing Darajat Unit II plant, therefore, little additional land clearing or preparation will take
place for the new facility.
Drilling of Production Wells no new wells are expected to be drilled for the initial operation of Unit
III. Make-up wells will be required in the future to support operation of the power plant units.
Connection of three existing wells - construction of the two steam pipelines will require some land
clearing in steep forested areas. Careful attention to the pipeline design and careful consideration of
the construction methodology will minimise the potential adverse impacts. During construction the
work will be closely monitored by CGI and the relevant authorities to ensure that adverse impacts are
minimised.
Operational Phase of Steam Field Requires attention on the air quality (H2S) concentration and
management, no significant impact is expected on physiography and geology, hydrology, fauna, and
aquatic biota.
Plant Operation Requires attention on the NCG emissions, air quality and H2S concentration, and
noise. The plant is not expected to have significant negative impacts on ambient air quality,
physiography and geology, hydrology and water quality, fauna, and aquatic biota.
Post-Operational Phase no significant impacts are expected.
A complete Environmental Impact Assessment (ANDAL) and Environmental Management and

Monitoring Plans were prepared for Darajat Unit III in accordance with Indonesian laws. Adherence to
the requirements of these plans will be ongoing.
CDM Executive Board
page 49
SECTION G. Stakeholders comments

G.1.
Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:
A stakeholder consultation was held in the multifunction room, Pendopo Bupati, Garut on 19th November
2003. The meeting was advertised in national and regional newspapers (Jakarta Post, Kompas and
Pikiran Rakyat) in both English and Bahasa Indonesia on the 12th November and the 19th November 2003.
In addition to the advertisements, CGI (then Amoseas Indonesia, Inc.) sent invitations to several specific
stakeholders including: the Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Energy, PLN, universities (including
Garut University), NGOs (including the Rural Community Network) as well as regional and community
leaders. Over 200 people attended the meeting which was conducted in Bahasa Indonesia.
The format of the meeting was:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Welcome & Introductions

Brief remarks about the proposed Darajat Unit III Project by CGI & Government officials
Project overview
Questions & Answers
The meeting was videotaped.

G.2.
Summary of the comments received:
Overall the local community was supportive of the proposal to expand the Darajat plant. The majority of
the questions related to the economic and community aspects of the project, such as the number of jobs
that would be created, empowerment of the local community, new local business and community
development projects, and local government tax revenues generated. The questions asked addressed
social, economic, and environmental considerations:
Social
How many local people are working with CGI, what is the percentage?
Will local people be given the opportunity to work in the new project?
How will CGI transfer technology to vocational schools present in the regency and enable the
people of Garut to acquire new skills.
Is it possible to implement social projects in other locations instead of Kecamatan Pasirwangi?
Could street lighting be installed along roads in the Pasirwangi district? This would help reduce
road accidents and crime.
Economic
How does CGI participate in to local government (Garut) income Contribution?
What is the expected tax revenue for local government (Garut)?
Environmental
What are the negative impacts of CGIs activities? An accurate environmental impact assessment
should be submitted prior to the licensing of the Darajat Unit III Project.
CDM Executive Board

G.3.
page 50
Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:
All the questions and comments were addressed at the meeting to the satisfaction of those who attended:
Social
Mr. Hidayat Yusuf (Chevron Geothermal Indonesia, Ltd) projected increased construction activities
that require more workers. CGI and the contractor selected to build the Darajat Unit III Project will
initiate coordinating measures on manpower recruitment. The contractor will refer to the local Office
of Manpower and the Garut Regency administration as the need arises. Employment requirements
will be adjusted to the expertise and skills needed for every type of work, including knowledge on
industrial safety. CGI will ask the contractor to provide training on skills and industrial safety to
prospective workers.
Mr. Hidayat Yusuf stated that CGI had assisted in the provision of street lighting along certain roads
in Garut Regency. He said that CGI made the contribution after the Garut Regency administration
claimed that traffic accidents and acts of crime occurred frequently on sections of those roads. The
street lighting, he said, would reduce vehicular accidents and street crimes. Mr. Hidayat Yusuf noted
that the local government must be consulted on any assistance that CGI wishes to extend. The
foregoing is especially true when it comes to establishing priorities.
Mr. Hidayat Yusuf said that the Darajat Unit III Project would be built by a contractor selected based
on an open bidding. CGI will pay the contractor upon completion of the project. Therefore,
additional workers recruited during construction of Unit III are those of the contractor rather than of
CGI.
Most of the workers employed by the Darajat project hailed from Garut and the surrounding areas.
CGI will request the Darajat Unit III Project contractor to give priority to local recruits who possess
the required skills and knowledge on industrial safety.
In the past CGI implemented community development programs in areas around its operations. The
programs sought to empower local economic initiatives. In the future, the programs will be stepped
up to meet present needs. However, there are no figures as yet on the extent of the programs.
CGI also contributed to improvements of educational facilities and development of instruction
programs. They include construction of new facilities and renovations of existing schools in areas
around its operations. CGI also contributed to improve teachers capacities and assisted more than
1,100 pupils. These activities represented contributions to human resources development in areas
around Darajat.
Economic
CGI has complied with all government regulations, particularly on remittance of taxes to the central
government of the Republic of Indonesia. These tax remittances undoubtedly represent portions of
the contributions made by Chevron Geothermal Indonesia, Ltd to local revenues. CGI will comply if
the central government directs that tax payments be made directly to Garut regency administration
based on the sharing of revenues between the central government and regional administrations.
Environmental
An Environmental Impact Assessment has been prepared for the project. As Unit III will utilize
existing transmission lines, steam lines, and wells there will be little added environmental impact to
the existing plant site and infrastructure.
CDM Executive Board
page 51
Annex 1
CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
Organization:
Street/P.O.Box:
Building:
City:
State/Region:
Postfix/ZIP:
Country:
Telephone:
FAX:
E-Mail:
URL:
Represented by:
Title:
Salutation:
Last Name:
Middle Name:
First Name:
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
Direct tel:
Personal E-Mail:
Chevron Geothermal Indonesia, Ltd

Sentral Senayan I
Jakarta
-10270
Indonesia
+62 21 573 1020
+62 21 5798 4477
--Maher Sungkar
OE/HES Manager
Mr
Sungkar
-Maher
Operational Excellence / Health Environment & Safety
-+62 21 5798 4477
+62 21 5798 4278
mahersk@chevron.com
Organization:
Street/P.O.Box:
Building:
City:
State/Region:
Postfix/ZIP:
Country:
Telephone:
FAX:
E-Mail:
URL:
Represented by:
Title:
Salutation:
Last Name:
Middle Name:
First Name:
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
Direct tel:
Personal E-Mail:
Chevron Limited
1 Westferry Circus
-London
-E14 4HA
UK
---www.chevron.com
The Company Secretary
-----Legal
--+44 20 7719 5124
--
CDM Executive Board
page 52
Annex 2
INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING.
There is no public funding for this project.
CDM Executive Board
page 53
Annex 3
BASELINE INFORMATION
The combined margin emission factor for the JAMALI interconnected electricity grid is calculated in the
MICROSOFT EXCEL spreadsheet JAMALI_Baseline_15June06.xls. A text only version of the
spreadsheet has been submitted for registration together with this PDD.
A listing of all the individual tabs (pages) within the spreadsheet appears at the end of this Annex 3.
Printed versions of the following tabs (pages) from the spreadsheet are directly attached to the PDD in
this Annex 3:
Process
Process used in calculating the JAMALI Baseline Emission Factor.
Table 1.
JAMALI Grid, 2000. Electricity produced and fuel consumed, according to Electricity
and Energy Statistics produced by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources,
Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization.
Table 2.
Table 3.
Table 4.
Table 5.
Table 6.
Calculation of Fuel-Specific CO2 Emission Rates from Fossil Fuel Combustion.
Table 7.
Calculation of Operating Margin Emission Factor based on DJLPE Statistics.
Table 8.
Calculation of Baseline Emission Factor, JAMALI Interconnected Electricity

Transmission Grid, Average Operating Margin Method.
Table 9.
RUKN (National Electricity Plan) 2005-2025. JAMALI Interconnected Grid.
Table 9a.
RUKN (National Electricity Plan) 2005-2025. JAMALI Interconnected Grid. (Graphs).
Table 10.
Non-condensable Gas Emissions from Geothermal Power Plants.
Attachment 3.1 Submission of the JAMALI Baseline Emission Factor by the Director General of
Electricity and Energy Utilization (DJLPE) of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Resources, to the Chairperson of the Designated National Authority of Indonesia, letter
1393/45/600.6/2006 dated 28 April 2006.
CDM Executive Board
page 54
List of tabs (pages) in the spreadsheet JAMALI_Baseline_31May06.xls.

Process
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 9a
Table 10
Table A1
Table A2
Table A3
Table A4
Table A5
Table A6
Table A7
Table A8
Table A9
Table B1
Table B2
Table B3
Overview of how the baseline calculation is performed and what assumptions are made
when data is not available from an official source
DJLPE published data for 2000 (fuel consumption & gross electricity generated by PLN
companies, net electricity purchased from IPPs)
DJLPE published [in preparation] data for 2004 (fuel consumption & gross electricity
generated by PLN companies, net electricity purchased from IPPs). Draws on data from
Tables B1/B2/B3.
Carbon emissions from fuel combustion based on IPCC values, specific fuel consumption
for gas and liquid fuels based on PLN P3B dispatch data and DJLPE fuel consumption,
specific fuel consumption for coal plants based on PLN P3B dispatch data and DJGSDM
fuel consumption (reconfirmed by IPPs) and default generation specific carbon dioxide
emission factors based on IPCC reference data and industry-typical heat rates
Calculation of Operating Margin Baseline Emission Factor, using DJLPE Data for Fuel
Consumption & Electricity Produced and IPCC Defaults for Carbon Emission per Fuel
Type
The main calculation sheet for the baseline emission factor
The National Electricity Plan for the JAMALI Grid - Capacity and Energy
The National Electricity Plan for the JAMALI Grid - Capacity and Energy (Same as
Table 9, but formatted to print the graphs)
Non-condensable Gas Emissions from Geothermal Power Plants
JAMALI electricity dispatch data 2000-2004 prepared by PLN P3B Unit Setlemen (the
group responsible to pay all the JAMALI generators for the electricity they dispatched)
Fuel consumption data 1999-2004 as reported by PTPJB
Fuel consumption by PT Paiton Energy Company for the years 2002 until 2005, and
typical coal analyses
Typical analyses for Indonesian coals burnt for electricity production on the JAMALI
grid
Typical analyses of coals produced by PT Bukit Asam
Status low-cost/must-run from PTPJB for their generators
Year of first operation from PTIP for their generators
Year of first operation from PTPJB for their generators
Suralaya coal fired power station coal specification (owned by PTIP)
DJLPE electricity generation data for 2004 for PLN companies
DJLPE PLN electricity purchases from IPPs data for 2004
DJLPE fuel consumption data for 2004 for PLN companies
CDM Executive Board

Legend
JAMALI
IPCC
DJLPE
DJGSDM
PLN
PTIP
PTPJB
PTPMT
IPP
PLN P3B
page 55
Java-Madura-Bali
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization, Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Resources
Directorate General of Geology and Mineral Resources, Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Resources (now DJMBPB, Directorate General of Minerals, Coal and geothermal
Energy)
PT PLN (Persero), the state owned electricity company which owns several generating
companies and manages the JAMALI grid
PT Indonesia Power, a PLN subsidiary generating company
PT Pembangkitan Jawa Bali, a PLN subsidiary generating company
PT Pembangkitan Muara Tawar, a PLN subsidiary generating company
Independent Power Producer, a generator selling electricity to PLN and dispatching this
onto the JAMALI grid
PT PLN (Persero) Penyaluran dan Pusat Pengatur Beban Jawa Bali. The PLN business
unit responsible for managing the JAMALI grid operations, specifically UBS (Unit Bisnis
Setelemen)
Process used in calculating the JAMALI Baseline Emission Factor

Item Description
Sheet reference where assumption used or sheet
where source data is stored
1
Approved Consolidated Methodology (ACM) 0002, Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity
generation from renewable sources is used. Current Version: #5, dated 03 March 2006.
Baseline Emission Factor [tonne CO 2/MWh despatched] = 50% of the Operating Margin Emission Factor plus [item
4] 50% of the Build Margin Emission Factor [item 5].
Operating Margin Emission Factor is based on the Average Operating Margin Emission Factor method because:
'[JAMALI_Baseline_15June06.xls]Table 8'!$AM$225
Data for the Despatch Data Analysis Emission Factor is NOT AVAILABLE
Low-Cost/Must-Run sources [item 9] produce more than 50% of the total JAMALI grid electricity
generated in each of the previous five years for which data is available (2000-2004).
4
Operating Margin Emission Factor = Generation weighted CO 2 mass emissions [item 7]/MWh despatched [item 6]
from all generating sources on the JAMALI grid in the last three years for which data is available (2002-2004).
Build Margin Emission Factor = Generation weighted CO 2 mass emissions [item 7]/MWh despatched [item 6] for
the years 2002, 2003 and 2004 from the set of plants most recently built comprising more than 20% of the total
grid generation (despatch basis) in 2004. When 20% falls on part capacity of a plant, that plant is fully included in
the calculation.
MWh despatched by each source = data provided by PLN P3B for 2000-2004.
Table A1
CO2 mass emissions per source are calculated as follows:

[1] When actual fuel consumption is given by the generator or is available from DJGSDM data and the actual
carbon content of the fuel used by a specific generator is either known or can be estimated [applies to Paiton
PTPJB, Paiton IPP (PEC:2002-2004, JP:2003-2004) and PTIP Suralaya (2003-2004) coal plants]
CO 2 emissions = fuel consumed x actual (or estimated) carbon content [converted to mass carbon per unit of
fuel consumed] x IPCC oxidation factor x 44/12
Table 8, Columns L, P, T, X and AB
[2] When actual fuel consumption is not given by the generator but a generator-specific fuel consumption for
subsequent years is available from DJGSDM or IPP fuel data together with P3B generation data and the actual
carbon content of the fuel used by a specific generator can be estimated [applies to PTIP and IPP coal plants
not included in 7[1]]
CO 2 emissions = lumped specific fuel consumption/MWh x estimated carbon content [converted to mass
carbon per unit of fuel consumed] x IPCC oxidation factor x 44/12 x total MWh despatched by generator
[3] When fuel consumption by a specific generator is known and actual carbon content of fuel is not known
[applies to PTPJB oil and gas plants]
CO 2 emissions = fuel consumed x IPCC default carbon content [converted to mass carbon per unit of fuel
consumed] x IPCC oxidation factor x 44/12
[4] When actual fuel consumption is not given by the generator but a lumped value is available from DJLPE
statistics and actual carbon content of fuel is not known [applies to PTIP and IPP steam oil plants and PTIP
OCGT oil fired plants]
CO 2 emissions = lumped specific fuel consumption/MWh x IPCC default carbon content [converted to mass
carbon per unit of fuel consumed] x IPCC oxidation factor x 44/12 x total MWh despatched by generator
[5] When fuel consumption by generator type or by generator is not known and actual carbon content of fuel is
not known [applies to PTIP open cycle gas turbine and IPP combined cycle gas turbine plants]
CO 2 emissions = IPCC Reference Fuel-specific Carbon Emission Factor* x 44/12 x IPCC oxidation factor** x
industry-typical heat rate*** x total MWh despatched by generator
[6] When geothermal CO 2 emissions per MWh are not known [applies to all geothermal plants except Darajat,
Gunung Salak and Wayang Windu]
CO 2 emissions = Darajat Unit III emissions/MWh x total MWh despatched by generator
[7] For a hydro-electric power plant or a steam turbine in a combined cycle power plant
CO 2 emissions = 0
8
Year of first operation (required for item 5 above)

This is either as provided by the generators or, if the generators did not provide data, assumed by Chevron
based on information available to Chevron (PTPJB and PTIP provided most of this data for their plants). The
data is presented by year and is not further differentiated by month so if more than one generator comes on
line in a year, and any one of these generators tips the 20% required for Build Margin [item 5], all plants in
that year are included in the Build Margin calculation.
Low-cost/Must-run (Yes or No for each generating source) (required for item 3 above)
PTPJB data from Table A6. PTIP data from Table A7.
Used in Table 8, Column H
PTPJB data from Table A6. Used in Table 8, Column AV
This is either as provided by PTPJB or assumed by Chevron on the following basis:
All hydro-electric plants are Yes as they are low cost.
Table 8, Column AV
All IPPs are Yes because they are Must Run (Take or Pay).
Table 8, Column AV
All non-IPP coal plants are Yes because they are either Low Cost or Must Run or both.
Table 8, Column AV
All PTIP thermal plants, excluding Suralaya, are No.
Table 8, Column AV
All PTIP geothermal plants are Yes.
Table 8, Column AV
10
When a liquid fuel is combusted in a gas turbine, but the type of liquid fuel is not known, it is assumed to be
gas/diesel oil per IPCC. When a liquid fuel is combusted in an oil fired boiler, but the type of liquid fuel is not
known, it is assumed to be crude oil per IPCC.
'[JAMALI_Baseline_15June06.xls]Table 6'!$J$42
11
Industry-typical heat rates have been selected based on new plant.
'[JAMALI_Baseline_15June06.xls]Table 6'!$E$62
*
= IPCC Reference CEF (mass carbon contained per unit of fuel energy consumed)
** = mass of carbon emitted per mass of carbon contained
*** = unit of fuel energy consumed per unit of electricity produced
Chevron Geothermal Indonesia Limited
Worksheet: Process
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 1
JAMALI Electricity Statistics. 2000.
Capacity : MW : LPE* Tabel 5

PLN*
IPP**
2,391
150
360
437
1,100
700
4,200
2,460
109
366
280
3,227
2,759
Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
Combined Cycle - Gas
15,492
3,047
Total
2,541
797
1,100
700
6,660
109
366
280
3,227
2,759
18,539
Generation : MWh : LPE* Tabel 10 & Tabel 11

PLN*
IPP*
Total
6,310,072
857,463
7,167,535
2,648,536
2,217,596
4,866,132
5,066,507
5,066,507
3,534,401
3,534,401
26,177,972
5,226,064
31,404,036
102,521
102,521
464,300
464,300
22,284
22,284
4,239,016
4,239,016
18,051,683
18,051,683
66,617,292
8,301,123
74,918,415
* Data from DJ LPE Statistics: "Statistik. Ketenagalistrikan Dan Energi. Tahun 2000. Report No. 14-2001". This appears to be gross [production], rather than
net [despatch].
**Data from PLN P3B [This is 2001 data, not 2000]
JAMALI GRID ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION 2000
Type of Power Plant
MWh 2000
7,167,535
4,866,132
102,521
5,066,507
3,534,401
31,404,036
464,300
4,239,016
22,284
18,051,683
% total
9.6%
6.5%
0.1%
6.8%
4.7%
41.9%
0.6%
5.7%
0.0%
24.1%
Total
74,918,415
100.0%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
10%
24%
0%
6%
0%
7%
5%
6%
1%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
41%
JAMALI GRID ELECTRICITY GENERATION CAPACITY 2000
Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Total
MW 2000
2,541
797
109
1,100
700
6,660
366
3,227
280
2,759
% total
13.7%
4.3%
0.6%
5.9%
3.8%
35.9%
2.0%
17.4%
1.5%
14.9%
18,539
100.0%
Qty
None
None
1,368,176
36,572
11,817,296
28,377
171,669
190
972,987
160,284
Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
2%
15%
14%
17%
4%
1%
6%
4%
2%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
35%
Fuel Used by PLN Plants (According to LPE * Tabel 25

Units
SFC
Units
kiloliters
mmscf
ton
kiloliters
kiloliters
mmscf^
kiloliters
mmscf^
0.2700
0.0103
0.4514
0.2768
0.3697
0.0085
0.2295
0.00888
liter/kWh
mscf/kWh
kg/kWh
liter/kWh
liter/kWh
mscf/kWh
liter/kWh
mscf/kWh
^ These numbers require further clarification
Worksheet: Table 1
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 2

PLN*
IPP**
2,391
150
360
437
1,100
700
4,200
2,460
111
366
280
3,227
2,759
Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
15,494
3,047
Total
2,541
797
1,100
700
6,660
111
366
280
3,227
2,759
18,541

PLN*
IPP*
Total
7,468,888
943,808
8,412,696
2,908,362
3,031,317
5,939,679
5,541,842
5,541,842
3,438,741
3,438,741
25,823,569
8,382,674
34,206,243
84,672
84,672
461,818
461,818
34,686
34,686
4,308,689
4,308,689
18,781,738
18,781,738
68,853,005
12,357,799
81,210,804
* Data from DJ LPE Statistics: "Statistik. Ketenagalistrikan Dan Energi. Tahun 2000. Report No. 14-2001". This appears to be gross [production], rather
than net [despatch].
**Data from PLN P3B
Type of Power Plant
MWh 2001
8,412,696
5,939,679
84,672
5,541,842
3,438,741
34,206,243
461,818
4,308,689
34,686
18,781,738
% total
10.4%
7.3%
0.1%
6.8%
4.2%
42.1%
0.6%
5.3%
0.0%
23.1%
Total
81,210,804
100.0%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Hydro
10%
23%
Geothermal
7%
0%
0%
7%
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
5%
1%
4%
Steam - Coal
43%

Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Total
MW 2001
2,541
797
111
1,100
700
6,660
366
3,227
280
2,759
% total
13.7%
4.3%
0.6%
5.9%
3.8%
35.9%
2.0%
17.4%
1.5%
14.9%
18,541
100.0%
Qty
None
None
1,472,360
34,354
12,039,309
24,486
216,579
156
1,035,664
155,724
Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
Hydro
Geothermal
2%
15%
Diesel
14%
4%
1%
6%
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
17%
4%
2%
35%

Fuel Used by PLN Plants (According to LPE *)

Units
SFC
Units
kiloliters
mmscf
ton
kiloliters
kiloliters
mmscf^
kiloliters
mmscf^
0.2657
0.0100
0.4662
0.2892
0.4690
0.0045
0.2404
0.00829
liter/kWh
mscf/kWh
kg/kWh
liter/kWh
liter/kWh
mscf/kWh
liter/kWh
mscf/kWh
Worksheet: Table 2
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 3

Type of Power Plant
Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
PLN*
2,397
360
IPP**
150
437
Total
2,547
797
PLN*
5,983,130
3,055,700
IPP*
1,014,392
3,041,151
Total
6,997,522
6,096,851
6,000
2,460
8,460
34,279,200
13,615,545
47,894,745
111
111
106,070
106,070
646
646
1,091,080
1,091,080
5,985
5,985
24,272,310
24,272,310
18,546
68,787,490
15,499
3,047
17,671,088
86,458,578
* Data from DJ LPE Statistics: "Statistik. Ketenagalistrikan Dan Energi. Tahun 2000. Report No. 14-2001". This appears to be gross
[production], rather than net [despatch].
**Data from PLN P3B
28%
8%
7%
0%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Type of Power Plant
Steam - Fossil Fuel

Combustion Turbine - Fossil Fuel
Combined Cycle - Fossil Fuel
MWh 2002
6,997,522
6,096,851
106,070
47,894,745
1,091,080
24,272,310
% total
8.09%
7.05%
0.12%
55.40%
1.26%
28.07%
Total
86,458,578
100.00%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Fossil Fuel
1%

56%

14%
4%
1%
32%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
3%
Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Fossil Fuel
Total
Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Diesel
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
MW 2002
2,547
797
111
8,460
646
5,985
% total
13.73%
4.30%
0.60%
45.62%
3.48%
32.27%
18,546
100.00%
Steam - Fossil Fuel

46%

Fuel Used by PLN Plants (According to LPE *, Tabel 20)

Qty Units
SFC
Units
None
None
kiloliters
^^
liter/kWh
kiloliters
^^
liter/kWh
4,017,399
kiloliters
^^
kiloliters
^^
liter/kWh
mmscf
^^
mscf/kWh
159,646 mmscf
^^
mscf/kWh
mmscf
^^
mscf/kWh
11,894,648 ton
^^
kg/kWh
^^ Cannot calculate as either fuel is aggregated, or electricity is aggregated or both
Paiton I (PTPJB)
Paiton II (Jawa Power)
Paiton II (Paiton Energy)
Suralaya (PTIP)
Coal Used and Electricity Produced by PLN & IPP Plants (Coal data according to operators, energy from P3B)
Qty Units
Energy Units
SFC
ton
1 MWh despatched
ton^*^
1 MWh despatched
3,184,193 ton*^*^
6,783,158 MWh despatched
0.469
ton
1 MWh despatched
-
Units
kg/kWh
kg/kWh
kg/kWh
kg/kWh
*^*^ Confirmed by Paiton Energy
Worksheet: Table 3
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 4
Capacity : MW : LPE Tabel 5*

PLN*
IPP**
2,409
150
360
437
1,000
80
800
4,200
2,460
90
548
98
2,718
3,267
150
Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
15,490
3,277
Total
2,559
797
1,080
800
6,660
90
548
98
2,718
3,417
18,767

PLN*
IPP*
Total
4,891,315
497,592
5,388,907
2,803,520
3,334,132
6,137,652
7,721,361
17,666
7,739,027
1,248,690
1,248,690
28,556,367
14,721,651
43,278,018
112,525
112,525
1,651,771
1,651,771
33,917
33,917
6,678,210
6,678,210
17,139,180
533,741
17,672,921
70,836,856
19,104,782
89,941,638
* Data from DJ LPE Statistics: "Statistik. Ketenagalistrikan Dan Energi. Tahun 2000. Report No. 14-2001". This appears to be gross [production],
rather than net (despatch).
**Data from PLN P3B
Type of Power Plant
MWh 2003
5,388,907
6,137,652
112,525
7,739,027
1,248,690
43,278,018
1,651,771
6,678,210
33,917
17,672,921
% total
6.0%
6.8%
0.1%
8.6%
1.4%
48.1%
1.8%
7.4%
0.0%
19.6%
Total
89,941,638
100.00%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
20%
6%
7% 0%
0%
7%
2%
48%
9%
1%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Total
Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
MW 2003
2,559
797
90
1,080
800
6,660
548
2,718
98
3,417
% total
13.6%
4.2%
0.5%
5.8%
4.3%
35.5%
2.9%
14.5%
0.5%
18.2%
18,767
100.0%
14%
18%
4%
0%
6%
1%
14%
4%
3%
36%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Fuel Used by PLN Plants (According to LPE*, Tabel 21

Qty Units
SFC
Units
None
None
2,115,547 kiloliters
0.2740
liter/kWh
12,197 mmscf
0.0098
mscf/kWh
13,294,501 ton
0.4656
kg/kWh
22,715 kiloliters^
0.2019
liter/kWh
611,725 kiloliters
0.3703
liter/kWh
1,051 mmscf^
0.0310
mscf/kWh
0.2513
liter/kWh
141,634 mmscf^
0.00826
mscf/kWh
Paiton I (PTPJB)
Suralaya (PTIP)
Coal Used and Electricity Produced by PLN & IPP Plants (Coal data according to GSDM*, Page 16, confirmed or modified by operators, energy from P3B
Qty Units
Energy Units
SFC Units
2,370,264 ton
0.499 kg/kWh
3,300,000 ton^*^
0.465 kg/kWh
3,615,544 ton*^*^
0.474 kg/kWh
10,821,164 ton
0.485 kg/kWh
*^* Confirmed by Jawa Power, slightly larger than the GSDM value
*^*^ Confirmed by Paiton Energy, slightly larger than the GSDM valu
Worksheet: Table 4
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 5
Capacity : MW : LPE Tabel 5*

PLN*
IPP**
2,409
150
375
437
1,000
80
800
4,200
2,460
104
1,459
40
2,416
3,267
150
Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
16,070
3,277
Total
2,559
812
1,080
800
6,660
104
1,459
40
2,416
3,417
19,347

PLN*
IPP*
Total
5,428,220
693,680
6,121,900
2,988,240
3,504,541
6,492,781
8,294,790
12,077
8,306,867
1,049,840
1,049,840
27,689,950
17,398,415
45,088,365
89,000
89,000
2,043,660
2,043,660
104,200
104,200
12,509,320
12,509,320
12,966,470
693,680
13,660,150
73,163,690
22,302,392
95,466,082
* Data from DJ LPE Statistics: "Statistik. Ketenagalistrikan Dan Energi. Tahun 2004. Report No. 18-2005"[DRAFT]. This appears to be gross
[production], rather than net [despatch].
**Data from PLN P3B
Type of Power Plant
MWh 2004
6,121,900
6,492,781
89,000
8,306,867
1,049,840
45,088,365
2,043,660
12,509,320
104,200
13,660,150
% total
6.4%
6.8%
0.1%
8.7%
1.1%
47.2%
2.1%
13.1%
0.1%
14.3%
Total
95,466,082
100.00%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
14%
0%
6%
7%
0%
13%
2%
48%
9%
1%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Type of Power Plant

Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Total
Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Diesel
MW 2004
2,559
812
104
1,080
800
6,660
1,459
2,416
40
3,417
% total
13.2%
4.2%
0.5%
5.6%
4.1%
34.4%
7.5%
12.5%
0.2%
17.7%
19,347
100.0%
13%
18%
4%
1%
6%
0%
12%
Fuel Used by PLN Plants (According to LPE*, Tabel 21

Qty Units
SFC
Units
None
None
0.2559
liter/kWh
11,219 mmscf
0.0107
mscf/kWh
13,425,337 ton
0.4848
kg/kWh
20,877 kiloliters^
0.2346
liter/kWh
471,057 kiloliters
0.2305
liter/kWh
1,801 mmscf^
0.0173
mscf/kWh
0.1938
liter/kWh
125,673 mmscf^
0.00969
mscf/kWh
4%
8%
34%
Hydro
Geothermal
Diesel
Steam - Oil
Steam - Gas
Steam - Coal
Suralaya
1.031823955
Paiton I (PTPJB)
Suralaya (PTIP)
Coal Used and Electricity Produced by PLN & IPP Plants (Coal data according to GSDM*, Page 16, confirmed or modified by operators, energy from P3B
Qty Units
Energy Units
SFC Units
2,767,434 ton*^
0.540 kg/kWh
3,770,000 ton*^*^
0.465 kg/kWh
4,428,373 ton*^*^
0.476 kg/kWh
10,664,587 ton
0.494 kg/kWh
*^Using PTPJB data as GSDM value is much less than this
*^* Confirmed by Jawa Power, slightly larger than the GSDM value
*^*^ Confirmed by Paiton Energy, slightly less than the GSDM valu
Worksheet: Table 5
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 6
0.892018779
JAMALI Interconnected Electricity Grid - Baseline Emissions

Calculation of Fuel-Specific CO 2 emission rates from Fossil Fuel Combustion
Table 6.1. IPCC Reference Data applicable to Indonesia
IPCC** Indonesia-Specific NCVs
Fuel
IPCC*** Reference CEFs

NCV Units
Crude Oil
Fuel
42.66 TJ/kt fuel
IPCC*^ Reference Oxidation Factors

CEF Units
Crude Oil
20.00 tC/TJ
Fuel
OXID Units
Oil
0.990 None
Natural Gas
42.77 TJ/kt fuel
Natural Gas
15.30 tC/TJ
Natural Gas
0.995 None
Bituminous Coal
23.00 TJ/kt fuel
Bituminous Coal
25.75 tC/TJ
Coal
0.980 None
Gas/Diesel Oil
42.66 TJ/kt fuel
Gas/Diesel Oil
20.20 tC/TJ
Table 6.2. IPCC Reference Data converted to Indonesia-Specific Fuel Consumption Units
Calculated Carbon Emissivities based on IPCC NCV, CEF and OXID
Fuel
Crude Oil
Conversion to JAMALI Consumption Units

CO2 Units
Carbon Units
845 tC/kt fuel
These values used in category 7[3]:

Actual fuel consumption known,
but carbon content not known.
CO2 Units
Factor Units
3097 tCO2/kt fuel
0.0009 kt fuel/kiloliter
Natural Gas
651 tC/kt fuel
2387 tCO2/kt fuel
0.019922 kt fuel/mmscf
Bituminous Coal
580 tC/kt fuel
2128 tCO2/kt fuel
1 kt fuel/kt fuel
Gas/Diesel Oil
853 tC/kt fuel
3128 tCO2/kt fuel
2.787 tCO2/kiloliterMFO
0.0009 kt fuel/kiloliter
2.787
47.562 tCO2/mmscf
47.562
2.128 tCO2/t fuel
2.128
2.815 tCO2/kiloliterHSD
2.815
Applies to PTPJB oil and gas plants
** Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for national Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual. Table 1-2. LHV.
*** Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for national Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual. Table 1-1.

Lumped specific fuel consumption
known, carbon content not known.
*^ Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for national Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual. Table 1-6.
Table 6.3. JAMALI Generation Specific CO 2 Emission Rates based on Lumped Specific Fuel Consumption (SFC) Data and IPCC Values from Table 6.2
Applies to PTIP and IPP steam oil plants and

PTIP OCGT oil fired plants
These values are "looked-up" from the formulae
in Table 8, Columns
JAMALI Generation Specific CO2 Emission Rates. PLN Power Plants. LPE Data
Based on actual specific fuel consumption (SFC) data and IPCC values
Fuel Type
Power Plant
SFC 2000
SFC 2001
SFC 2002
SFC 2003
SFC 2004
Units
Average CO2
Emission Rate.
Not energy
weighted.
Oil
Diesel
Natural Gas
Steam - Boiler
Natural Gas
OCGT
Natural Gas
CCGT
Oil
Steam - Boiler
Oil
OCGT
0.370
0.469 Cannot calculate
0.370
0.230
kiloliter/MWh
1.013
Oil
CCGT
0.230
0.251
0.194
kiloliter/MWh
0.644
Coal
Steam - Boiler
0.451
0.466

Actual fuel consumption known,
carbon content known or estimable.
tCO2/MWh
0.277
0.289
Cannot calculate
Don't use
0.235
kiloliter/MWh
0.751
Don't use
Don't use Cannot calculate
Don't use
Don't use
Don't use
Don't use
Don't use
Don't use
Don't use
Use Default
Don't use
Don't use
Don't use
Don't use
Use Default
0.270
0.274
0.256
Use Default
kiloliter/MWh
Applies to Paiton PTPJB, Paiton IPP (PEC:20022004, JP:2003-2004) and PTIP Suralaya (20032004) coal plants
0.743
0.485
t/MWh
0.994
Is this improved oil consumption due to increased fuel efficiency (matching a 100% energy increase from PLTGUoil)?
Table 6.4. JAMALI Coal Generation Specific CO 2 Emission Rates based on Specific Fuel Consumption (SFC) Data, as-received coal Carbon Contents and IPCC Oxidation Values
JAMALI Generation Specific CO2 Emission Rates. All Coal Plants - PLN, IPP & GSDM Data
Based on actual specific fuel consumption (SFC) data, actual as-received coal carbon content and IPCC value for oxidation
Fuel Type
Power Plant
SFC 2000
SFC 2001
SFC 2002
SFC 2003
SFC 2004
Units
As-received
carbon content of
coal mix used at
plant
Units
Average CO2
Emission Rate.
Not energy
weighted.
Units
Average CO2
Emission Rate.
Not energy
weighted.
Units
Paiton I (PTPJB)
Steam - Boiler
0.499
0.540
t coal (AR)/MWh
0.532
tC/t coal (AR)
1.912
t CO2/t coal (AR)1
0.993
t CO2/MWh
Steam - Boiler
0.465
0.465
t coal (AR)/MWh
0.558
tC/t coal (AR)
2.006
t CO2/t coal (AR)2
0.933
t CO2/MWh
0.474
0.476
t coal (AR)/MWh
0.530
tC/t coal (AR)
1.903
t CO2/t coal (AR)3
0.900
t CO2/MWh
0.485
0.494
t coal (AR)/MWh
0.550
tC/t coal (AR)
1.976
t CO2/t coal (AR)4
0.967
t CO2/MWh
Paiton II (Paiton Energy) Steam - Boiler

Suralaya (PTIP)
0.469
Steam - Boiler
Table 6.5. Default Generation Specific CO 2 Emission Rates based on assumed new plant Heat Rates and IPCC emissivity and LHV values
Default Generation Specific CO2 Emission Rates.
Used in the absence of actual fuel consumption data
Fuel Type
Power Plant
LHV Efficiency LHV Heat Rate IPCC Emissivity

[New Plant]
[New Plant]
kgCO2/kgfuel
kJfuel /kgfuel
Natural Gas
Steam - Boiler
36.7%
9,800
2.387
42770
0.547
Natural Gas
OCGT
29.0%
12,400
2.387
42770
0.692
9,800,000 kJfuel/MWhelec
Natural Gas
CCGT
53.7%
6,700
2.387
42770
0.374
0.547 tCO2/MWhelec
Oil
Steam - Boiler
36.4%
9,900
3.097
42660
0.719
Oil
OCGT
29.0%
12,400
3.097
42660
0.900
100 x kJelec/kJfuel
kJfuel /kWh elec
IPCC Lower CO2 Emission

Heat Value
Rate
tCO2/MWh
Oil
CCGT
53.7%
6,700
3.097
42660
0.486
Coal
Steam - Boiler
37.1%
9,700
2.128
23000
0.898
OCGT = Open Cycle Gas Turbine (Combustion turbine without exhaust heat recovery)
CCGT = Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (Combustion turbine with exhaust heat recovery but no supplementary firing in HRSG)
0.000000056 tCO2/kjfuel
These values are used in category 7[2]:

Fuel consumption not known,
but later years generator-specific fuel
consumption is known and
can be used in earlier years,
and carbon content can be estimated.
Applies to PTIP and IPP coal plants
not included in 7[1]

Actual fuel consumption not known,
specific fuel consumption not
known, carbon content not known.
Applies to PTIP OCGT gas plants and one IPP
CCGT gas plant
Worksheet: Table 6
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 7
JAMALI Interconnected Electricity Grid - Baseline Emissions
Calculation of Operating Margin Baseline Emission Factor
Based on ACM0002 - Average Method
Using LPE Data for Fuel Consumption & PLN P3B Data for Electricity Produced, IPCC Defaults for
Carbon Emission per Fuel Type
PLN's Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Coal (PLN)
Emission Factor Units
Consumption Units
t CO2 emitted
2000
11,817,296 t
2.128 tCO2/t fuel
25,148,998
2001
12,039,309 t
2.128 tCO2/t fuel
25,621,476
2002
11,894,648 t
2.128 tCO2/t fuel
25,313,615
2003
13,294,501 t
2.128 tCO2/t fuel
28,292,714
2004
13,294,501 t
2.128 tCO2/t fuel
28,292,714
Natural Gas (PLN)

Consumption Units
t CO2 emitted
2000
197,046 mmscf
47.562 tCO2/mmscf
9,371,863
2001
190,234 mmscf
47.562 tCO2/mmscf
9,047,862
2002
159,646 mmscf
47.562 tCO2/mmscf
7,593,048
2003
154,882 mmscf
47.562 tCO2/mmscf
7,366,464
2004
138,693 mmscf
47.562 tCO2/mmscf
6,596,501
Oil (PLN)
Consumption Units
t CO2 emitted
2000
2,512,832 kiloliter
2.815 tCO2/kiloliter
2001
2,724,603 kiloliter
7,670,516
2002
4,017,399 kiloliter
11,310,097
2003
4,177,045 kiloliter
11,759,545
2004
5,018,021 kiloliter
14,127,128
7,074,322
Total Fossil Fuel

Emissions (PLN)
t CO2 emitted
2000
41,595,182
2001
42,339,853
2002
44,216,760
2003
47,418,723
2004
49,016,343
Independent Power Producer Carbon Dioxide Emissions (including PLN's geothermal emissions)
Geothermal Emissions (PLN & IPP)
IPP Coal Emissions
IPP Natural Gas Emissions
MWh
tCO2/MWh^
t CO2 emitted
MWh
tCO2/MWh
t CO2 emitted
MWh
tCO2/ MWh
t CO2 emitted
2000
4,866,132
0.032
155,716
5,226,064
1.051
5,492,762
2001
5,939,679
0.032
190,070
8,382,674
1.051
8,810,460
2002
6,096,851
0.032
195,099
13,615,545
1.051
14,310,376
2003
6,137,652
0.032
196,405
14,721,651
1.051
15,472,929
533,741
0.374
199,614
2004
6,492,781
0.032
207,769
17,398,415
1.051
18,286,294
693,680
0.374
259,430
^Using the same data as Darajat
Operating Margin Emission Factor, JAMALI Grid, Average Method, LPE Data & Estimated IPP Data [Krakatau excluded]
total MWh
t CO2 emitted
tCO2/MWh
2000
71,639,023
47,243,660
0.659
2001
78,782,567
51,340,383
0.652
2002
84,019,515
58,722,236
0.699
2003
86,997,168
63,287,671
0.727
2004
92,533,658
67,769,836
0.732
Total (all)
413,971,932
288,363,786
0.697
Total ('02-'04)
263,550,341
189,779,742
0.720
CO2 Emissions on JAMALI Grid

80,000,000
tonnes CO2
70,000,000
60,000,000
50,000,000
40,000,000
30,000,000
20,000,000
10,000,000
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Year
This value is not used in the baseline

calculation as it overstates the carbon
emissions by approximately 3.5%
Notes
1
2
Electricity generation (MWh) data is obtained from PLN P3B (refer Table 8)
Fuel consumption data for government-owned electricity generating plants is obtained directly from official Government of
Indonesia data published by the Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization. Refer "Statistics. Electricity and
Energy." 2000-2004. Reports. 14-2001/15-2002/16-2003/17-2004/18-2005.
Refer to Table 6 for Carbon Dioxide Emission Factors based on fuel type.
Worksheet: Table 7
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 8
Data excl. for this year & earlier
Plant Name
Operator
Generator Type & Fuel

Number Not used if actual fuel
consumption is given
SAGULING
SAGULING
PLENGAN
PLENGAN
PLENGAN
PLENGAN
PLENGAN
LAMAJAN
LAMAJAN
LAMAJAN
CIKALONG
CIKALONG
CIKALONG
BENGKOK
UBRUG
UBRUG
UBRUG
KRACAK
KRACAK
KRACAK
P. KONDANG
P. KONDANG
PB. SOEDIRMAN
PB. SOEDIRMAN
PB. SOEDIRMAN
JELOK
JELOK
JELOK
JELOK
TIMO
TIMO
TIMO
GARUNG
GARUNG
KETENGER
KETENGER
KETENGER
KEDUNGOMBO
W. LINTANG
W. LINTANG
Suralaya
Suralaya
Suralaya
Suralaya
Suralaya
Suralaya
Suralaya
PRIOK
PRIOK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
PERAK
PERAK
PRIOK/PEMARON
PRIOK/PEMARON
SUNYARGI
SUNYARGI
SUNYARGI
SUNYARGI
PRIOK (T32)
PRIOK (T32)
CILACAP
CILACAP
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
GILIMANUK
PRIOK
PRIOK
PRIOK
PRIOK
PRIOK
PRIOK
PRIOK
PRIOK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
TAMBAKLOROK
GRATI
GRATI
GRATI
GRATI
GRATI
GRATI
GRATI
GRATI
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
PESANGGARAN
KAMOJANG
KAMOJANG
KAMOJANG
DARAJAT
G.SALAK
G.SALAK
G.SALAK
CIRATA
CIRATA
CIRATA
CIRATA
SUTAMI
SUTAMI
SUTAMI
SENGGURUH
SENGGURUH
SELOREJO
MENDALAN
MENDALAN
MENDALAN
MENDALAN
SIMAN
SIMAN
SIMAN
WLINGI
WLINGI
LODOYO
TULUNGAGUNG
TULUNGAGUNG
GIRINGAN
GIRINGAN
GIRINGAN
GOLANG
GOLANG
GOLANG
NGEBEL
Paiton
Paiton
Paiton
Muarakarang (BBM)
Muarakarang (BBM)
Muarakarang (BBM)
Muarakarang (BBG)
Muarakarang (BBM)
Muarakarang (BBG)
Muarakarang (BBG)
Muarakarang (BBG)
Muarakarang (BBG)
M.Twar Blok-1(BBM)
M.Twar Blok-1(BBM)
M.Twar Blok-2(BBM)
M.Twar Blok-2(BBM)
M.Twar Blok-3(BBM)
M.Twar Blok-3(BBM)
M.Twar Blok-4(BBM)
M.Twar Blok-4(BBM)
GRESIK
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTIP
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPJB
PTPMT
PTPMT
PTPMT
PTPMT
PTPJB
1,2
3,4
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
1
2
3
1,2,3,4
1
2
3
1
2
3
1,2
3,4
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
4
1
2
3
3
4
4
5
1
2
3
4
1
3
1
2
1
2
3
4
1
GT1.1
GT1.2
GT1.3
ST1.0
GT2.1
GT2.2
GT2.3
ST2.0
GT1.1
GT1.2
GT1.3
ST1.0
GT2.1
GT2.2
GT2.3
ST2.0
GT1.1
GT1.2
GT1.3
ST1.0
GT2.1
GT2.2
GT2.3
ST2.0
1,2,3,4,5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3
1
1
2
3
1,2
3,4
5,6
7,8
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
1
2
1-2
1
2
3
4
5
GT1.1
GT1.2
GT1.3
ST1.0
GT1.1-1.2
GT1.3
GT2.1-2.2
ST1.0
GT3.1-3.2
GT3.3
GT4.1-4.2
GT4.3
1-2
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTUc4
PLTUc4
PLTUc4
PLTUc4
PLTUc4
PLTUc4
PLTUc4
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTG
PLTG
PLTG
PLTA
PLTG
PLTG
PLTG
PLTA
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTA
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTA
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTA
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTA
PLTD
PLTD
PLTD
PLTD
PLTD
PLTD
PLTD
PLTP
PLTP
PLTP
PLTP
PLTP
PLTP
PLTP
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTA
PLTUc1
PLTUc1
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTUo
PLTUg
PLTUo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTA
PLTG
PLTG
PLTG
PLTA
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTGo
PLTUg
tCO2/MWh 2005 MW Ex First Year of Full

P3B Operation (Year
Not used if actual
following "Tahun
fuel consumption is
Mulai Operasi")
given
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.967
0.967
0.967
0.967
0.967
0.967
0.967
0.743
0.743
0.743
0.743
0.743
0.743
0.743
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
0.692
0.692
0.692
0.000
0.692
0.692
0.692
0.000
1.013
1.013
1.013
0.000
1.013
1.013
1.013
0.000
1.013
1.013
1.013
0.000
1.013
1.013
1.013
0.000
0.751
0.751
0.751
0.751
0.751
0.751
0.751
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.993
0.993
0.743
0.743
0.743
0.743
0.547
0.743
1.013
1.013
1.013
0.000
0.692
0.692
0.692
0.000
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
0.547
175.18
175.18
1.08
1.08
1.08
2.02
1.61
6.52
6.52
6.52
6.40
6.40
6.40
3.85
5.94
5.94
6.48
6.30
6.30
6.30
4.98
4.92
60.30
60.30
60.30
5.12
5.12
5.12
5.12
4.00
4.00
4.00
13.20
13.20
3.52
3.52
1.00
22.50
9.00
9.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
600.00
600.00
600.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
200.00
50.00
50.00
48.80
48.80
20.03
20.03
20.10
20.10
26.00
26.00
29.00
26.00
21.35
20.10
42.00
42.00
133.80
130.00
130.00
130.00
200.00
130.00
130.00
130.00
200.00
109.65
109.65
109.65
188.00
109.65
109.65
109.65
188.00
100.75
100.75
100.75
159.58
100.75
100.75
100.75
0.00
4.14
6.77
6.77
6.52
6.52
12.39
12.39
30.00
55.00
55.00
55.00
55.00
55.00
55.00
252.00
252.00
252.00
252.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
14.50
14.50
4.48
5.60
5.80
5.80
5.80
3.60
3.60
3.60
27.00
27.00
4.50
18.00
18.00
0.90
0.90
1.40
0.90
0.90
0.90
2.20
400.00
400.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
200.00
200.00
107.86
107.86
107.86
185.00
280.00
140.00
220.00
280.00
143.00
143.00
143.00
143.00
100.00
1986
1987
1922
1922
1922
1962
1930
1925
1925
1925
1961
1961
1961
1923
1924
1924
1950
1927
1927
1958
1955
1955
1985
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1989
1989
1989
1990
1997
1997
1997
1972
1972
1978
1978
1983
1978
1978
1977
1977
1976
1976
1976
1976
2000
2000
1995
1996
1985
1993
1994
1994
1997
1993
1993
1993
1994
1994
1994
1994
1995
1983
1983
1983
1997
1995
1996
1995
1997
1995
1996
1996
1997
2002
2002
2002
2002
1980
1982
1982
1983
1983
1989
1989
1982
1987
1987
1994
1994
1994
1997
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1993
1993
1993
1979
1979
1979
1981
1982
1992
1992
1992
1995
1995
1997
1997
1997
2004
2004
2004
2004
1981
MWh
1,173,415
1,098,372
4,780
4,817
5,067
9,584
6,338
36,362
32,499
37,953
22,161
26,336
27,443
15,962
14,650
15,713
14,670
18,281
21,876
22,037
25,684
25,763
174,910
196,022
192,658
30,492
26,868
27,782
28,541
24,006
26,925
28,520
23,645
24,186
20,504
20,967
3,662
66,712
55,106
56,665
2,119,177
2,127,624
2,117,049
2,441,532
3,564,710
4,041,535
3,593,245
319,295
298,674
1,174,549
7,204
2,380
2,705
1,291
2,188
2,527
352
206
2,186
10,344
17,266
23,286
90,083
180,688
51,819
957,322
904,463
661,606
1,113,084
838,536
755,277
959,575
1,211,094
478,945
328,028
255,042
285,666
112,530
169,194
284,485
259,489
8,381
19,788
30,896
1,170
31,820
1,544
6,481
14,667
197,565
449,869
298,999
401,533
380,331
358,824
233,319
223,928
279,272
389,437
377,095
162,002
203,184
157,112
45,576
41,577
31,839
1,734
40,806
15,310
31,218
24,219
25,473
25,010
99,115
74,516
38,834
82,841
82,328
6,042
5,999
4,517
5,111
5,068
4,386
9,778
2,105,433
2,540,850
468,297
425,427
496,731
995,028
1,014,732
717,590
475,274
740,887
621,149
143,127
39,245
32,079
552,374
Fuel Conversion req'd if

tCO2 (If fuel
Consumed
consumption is
fuel q'ty shown.
Refer Table 6 given, formula uses
Table 6, otherwise it
uses column F)
2,049,441
2,057,610
2,047,383
2,361,188
3,447,405
3,908,540
3,475,002
237,109
221,795
872,220
7,299
2,411
2,741
1,308
2,217
2,561
357
209
2,215
10,480
17,493
23,593
91,270
183,070
52,503
662,622
626,035
457,938
580,403
522,774
664,181
485,259
332,352
258,405
114,014
171,425
288,236
8,491
20,049
23,211
879
23,905
1,160
4,869
11,019
5,955
13,559
9,012
12,102
11,304
10,665
6,935
2,262,503 t CO2/t coal (AR)1
4,325,918
4,368 tCO2/kiloliterHSD
412,151 tCO2/kiloliterMFO
12,297
1,148,832
13,742 tCO2/mmscf
653,594
562,632
MWh
1,494,079
1,491,515
5,798
5,643
4,167
11,119
7,004
46,972
41,365
26,951
31,755
25,460
30,372
17,522
20,273
20,566
19,735
25,449
20,598
27,033
24,399
24,504
189,156
213,639
208,140
27,861
25,699
29,302
25,203
24,660
26,694
23,510
22,212
21,496
21,676
21,202
2,266
73,970
62,120
64,788
2,542,201
2,313,740
1,985,604
2,253,745
3,481,300
3,859,153
3,502,477
264,532
244,440
1,162,504
218,035
48,016
7,779
25
2,116
2,528
9,097
6,694
2,136
8,814
10,029
16,518
36,332
41,427
202,062
135,058
851,495
827,741
509,843
1,034,743
809,586
907,556
736,226
1,131,809
248,623
43,902
384,883
322,953
395,513
286,235
476,905
549,525
52,908
119,959
5,388
19,254
1,585
1,061
17,500
20,646
49
11,749
14,231
227,407
393,402
434,248
445,022
445,106
440,635
357,128
260,233
276,357
536,632
522,965
175,722
168,402
144,763
46,693
48,189
28,155
2,737
28,476
25,689
28,700
23,104
24,129
22,405
83,940
87,785
38,525
80,653
84,266
7,265
7,306
4,190
4,478
4,129
9,298
2,350,354
2,139,931
510,097
529,956
521,597
1,073,210
892,606
701,996
713,787
674,902
1,057,904
633,231
307,682
226,370
-

tCO2 (If fuel
Consumed
consumption is
fuel q'ty shown.
uses column F)
2,458,545
2,237,602
1,920,263
2,179,581
3,366,741
3,732,160
3,387,221
196,441
181,521
863,275
161,912
35,656
7,881
26
2,143
2,561
9,217
6,782
2,165
8,931
10,161
16,736
36,811
41,974
204,726
136,838
589,372
572,931
352,894
560,364
628,176
509,588
251,901
44,481
389,958
400,728
290,009
483,192
53,606
121,541
5,459
1,191
797
13,147
15,510
37
8,827
10,691
6,854
11,857
13,088
13,413
13,229
13,096
10,614
2,219,589 t CO2/t coal (AR)1
4,243,866
19,735
1,277,961
tCO2/mmscf
12,317 tCO2/mmscf
585,818
640,342
MWh
990,572
1,316,128
4,576
4,152
4,785
7,691
6,308
32,026
35,388
17,760
23,647
17,007
22,680
14,421
21,144
17,424
21,752
27,789
17,115
27,148
22,659
22,748
115,694
115,929
126,463
22,250
20,184
20,913
20,588
17,846
18,784
22,801
15,180
15,105
19,881
20,142
59,777
61,280
57,245
1,281,976
2,461,963
2,537,539
2,719,176
4,149,579
3,132,048
4,035,707
254,843
256,122
1,022,805
7,396
183,719
60
7,999
20,870
22,009
12,513
9,452
29,446
13,301
93,991
126,050
182,618
509,711
943,042
658,483
728,557
1,104,244
810,850
716,739
663,434
1,064,827
356,332
166,511
501,449
502,474
482,390
333,466
391,256
556,310
122,901
309,594
200,169
27,900
57,760
28,843
29,595
14,079
14,285
247,321
458,024
435,863
425,057
432,315
430,105
461,426
293,521
202,590
372,962
419,468
169,610
175,535
135,255
38,255
43,691
26,744
15,504
9,680
27,740
29,940
18,363
23,355
23,375
82,345
73,932
38,309
60,557
59,997
6,178
6,157
798
4,130
4,070
3,586
9,114
1,769,499
2,382,513
496,279
566,959
435,958
854,950
1,089,656
659,094
709,958
684,210
956,997
788,105
350,020
295,249
-

tCO2 (If fuel
Consumed
consumption is
fuel q'ty shown.
uses column F)
1,239,790
2,380,947
2,454,036
2,629,696
4,013,029
3,028,981
3,902,903
189,247
190,196
759,534
5,492
136,429
61
8,104
21,145
22,299
12,678
9,576
29,834
13,476
95,230
127,712
185,026
516,431
652,738
455,777
504,279
561,239
496,099
459,204
361,030
168,706
508,060
488,750
337,863
396,415
124,521
313,675
202,808
28,268
58,522
21,668
22,233
10,577
10,732
7,454
13,805
13,137
12,811
12,849
12,783
13,714
2,121,797 t CO2/t coal (AR)1
4,056,887
11,726
1,293,977
tCO2/mmscf
9,980 tCO2/mmscf
474,667
779,208
MWh
721,152
1,054,569
2,540
1,893
4,693
9,196
3,934
23,073
28,743
17,643
23,118
13,217
15,252
11,156
18,903
18,871
19,177
23,442
7,782
26,050
22,579
22,659
144,964
113,697
156,480
24,411
21,555
22,956
20,557
18,802
21,987
24,011
17,297
11,573
22,688
22,382
48,198
51,204
48,452
2,895,861
2,625,679
2,625,806
2,468,326
4,105,522
3,599,866
3,998,130
318,360
319,636
1,113,843
211,509
149,061
20,427
28,071
42,758
58,993
8,786
21,919
14,051
41,963
39,711
226,543
221,730
609,119
807,711
939,744
951,891
1,120,143
861,482
711,258
583,622
1,044,658
336,483
479,915
266,712
495,540
439,247
269,463
306,767
420,657
212,480
288,995
296,719
82,294
91,979
137,485
29,677
15,978
16,178
926
12,925
15,223
250,911
432,451
459,255
432,841
373,843
327,708
375,955
265,762
103,714
252,647
273,967
126,966
159,222
107,485
36,401
33,666
21,601
18,246
3,039
28,050
27,701
15,903
20,227
20,236
64,424
64,894
37,126
62,107
54,273
5,512
5,531
3,386
3,537
3,084
7,990
2,391,908
2,359,634
561,327
527,446
553,009
480,297
1,052,247
668,374
723,927
762,091
1,065,060
851,608
34,618
404,571
35,189
-

tCO2 (If fuel
Consumed
consumption is
fuel q'ty shown.
uses column F)
2,515,019
2,515,019
2,515,019
2,515,019
3,772,528
3,772,528
3,772,528
236,414
237,362
827,140
157,066
110,692
20,696
28,441
43,322
59,771
8,902
22,208
14,237
42,516
40,234
229,530
224,653
617,150
559,067
650,455
658,863
596,285
492,305
403,961
340,919
486,243
270,228
445,038
273,016
310,811
215,282
292,805
300,631
93,192
139,297
30,068
12,004
12,154
696
9,710
11,436
7,562
13,034
13,842
13,046
11,111
9,740
11,174
2,370,364
4,532,149
5,662
1,441,358
tCO2/mmscf
6,394 tCO2/mmscf
304,110
585,065
MWh
1,149,737
834,327
4,876
3,184
4,533
10,652
2,472
34,411
28,460
24,287
25,068
16,880
19,567
14,430
20,657
20,563
22,308
25,296
13,584
31,183
24,856
18,959
153,818
130,280
148,620
21,893
23,086
24,227
23,379
20,002
22,355
23,674
30,838
1,852
24,984
20,348
64,103
44,884
41,260
2,450,688
1,970,214
2,420,249
2,472,291
4,021,292
3,906,484
4,336,995
286,659
351,827
965,502
226,648
193,799
74,706
23,323
70,864
31,819
8,623
21,563
19,383
52,714
35,491
264,988
229,826
699,000
650,105
738,452
667,761
1,000,433
685,849
865,996
891,791
1,182,996
454,292
425,678
260,051
545,602
389,725
430,443
421,027
554,804
224,908
54,152
410,962
233,690
142,264
47,797
173,231
6,655
3,813
12,659
23,088
7,669
12,314
247,810
459,163
433,622
453,050
435,831
420,690
378,010
264,400
274,217
297,818
252,403
147,513
167,299
127,903
34,273
34,941
23,281
6,970
36,018
35,814
16,380
20,786
21,192
64,726
82,114
37,551
52,967
56,560
6,734
6,744
4,000
3,554
3,587
8,081
2,546,770
2,582,002
576,774
525,121
465,465
926,173
755,806
651,556
358,882
522,241
553,370
1,242,581
618,499
1,006,663
170,684
275,695
155,994
290,015
128,011

tCO2 (If fuel
Consumed
consumption is
fuel q'ty shown.
uses column F)
2,478,628
2,478,628
2,478,628
2,478,628
3,717,941
3,717,941
3,717,941
212,873
261,266
716,982
168,308
143,915
75,691
23,631
71,798
32,238
8,736
21,847
19,639
53,409
35,959
268,482
232,856
708,216
449,978
511,128
462,199
474,719
599,409
617,264
460,281
431,290
263,480
394,863
436,117
426,578
227,873
54,865
416,381
144,140
48,427
175,515
5,000
2,864
9,510
17,345
5,761
9,251
7,469
13,839
13,069
13,655
12,954
12,504
11,235
5,291,349
5,566
1,390,530
tCO2/mmscf
6,022 tCO2/mmscf
286,417
968,684
279,330
158,050
293,838
129,699
MWh
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.1
Cat7.1
Cat7.1
Cat7.1
Cat7.1
Cat7.1
Cat7.1
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.7
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.7
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.7
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.7
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.7
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.6
Cat7.6
Cat7.6
Cat7.6
Cat7.6
Cat7.6
Cat7.6
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.7
Cat7.1
Cat7.1
Cat7.1
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.7
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.3
Cat7.7
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
Cat7.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,564,710
4,041,535
3,593,245
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
352
206
0
0
0
0
0
0
51,819
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
285,666
0
0
0
259,489
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
233,319
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
39,245
32,079
0
0
0
0
% total kWh
18.2%
20.7%
18.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
1.5%
1.3%
1.2%
0.2%
0.2%
1996
tCO2
MWh
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,447,405
3,908,540
3,475,002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
357
209
0
0
0
0
0
0
52,503
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,935
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,136
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
% total kWh
0.0%
1997
tCO2
MWh
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,165
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,452
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27,900
57,760
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
% total kWh
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
1999
1999
tCO2
MWh
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,576
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28,268
58,522
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,786
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
91,979
137,485
29,677
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
% total kWh
0.0%
0.5%
0.7%
0.2%
tCO2
MWh
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,902
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
93,192
139,297
30,068
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,623
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
142,264
47,797
173,231
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
275,695
155,994
290,015
128,011
m
m
% total kWh
0.0%
0.7%
0.2%
0.8%
1.3%
0.7%
1.4%
0.6%
1999
tCO2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,736
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
144,140
48,427
175,515
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
279,330
158,050
293,838
129,699
"Low-Cost/
Must-Run"?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
kWh kWh "LowCost /MustRun"
1,173,415
1,098,372
4,780
4,817
5,067
9,584
6,338
36,362
32,499
37,953
22,161
26,336
27,443
15,962
14,650
15,713
14,670
18,281
21,876
22,037
25,684
25,763
174,910
196,022
192,658
30,492
26,868
27,782
28,541
24,006
26,925
28,520
23,645
24,186
20,504
20,967
3,662
66,712
55,106
56,665
2,119,177
2,127,624
2,117,049
2,441,532
3,564,710
4,041,535
3,593,245
0
0
319,295
298,674
1,174,549
0
0
7,204
2,380
2,705
1,291
2,188
2,527
352
206
2,186
10,344
17,266
23,286
90,083
180,688
51,819
957,322
904,463
661,606
1,113,084
838,536
755,277
959,575
1,211,094
478,945
328,028
255,042
285,666
112,530
169,194
284,485
259,489
8,381
19,788
0
0
0
0
0
0
30,896
0
1,170
31,820
1,544
6,481
14,667
197,565
449,869
298,999
401,533
380,331
358,824
233,319
223,928
279,272
389,437
377,095
162,002
203,184
157,112
45,576
41,577
31,839
1,734
40,806
15,310
31,218
24,219
25,473
25,010
99,115
74,516
38,834
82,841
82,328
6,042
5,999
4,517
5,111
5,068
4,386
9,778
2,105,433
2,540,850
0
468,297
425,427
496,731
995,028
1,014,732
717,590
475,274
740,887
621,149
143,127
0
39,245
32,079
0
0
0
0
1,173,415
1,098,372
4,780
4,817
5,067
9,584
6,338
36,362
32,499
37,953
22,161
26,336
27,443
15,962
14,650
15,713
14,670
18,281
21,876
22,037
25,684
25,763
174,910
196,022
192,658
30,492
26,868
27,782
28,541
24,006
26,925
28,520
23,645
24,186
20,504
20,967
3,662
66,712
55,106
56,665
2,119,177
2,127,624
2,117,049
2,441,532
3,564,710
4,041,535
3,593,245
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
197,565
449,869
298,999
401,533
380,331
358,824
233,319
223,928
279,272
389,437
377,095
162,002
203,184
157,112
45,576
41,577
31,839
1,734
40,806
15,310
31,218
24,219
25,473
25,010
99,115
74,516
38,834
82,841
82,328
6,042
5,999
4,517
5,111
5,068
4,386
9,778
2,105,433
2,540,850
0
468,297
425,427
496,731
995,028
1,014,732
717,590
475,274
740,887
621,149
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
tCO2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,049,441
2,057,610
2,047,383
2,361,188
3,447,405
3,908,540
3,475,002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,955
13,559
9,012
12,102
11,304
10,665
6,935
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,325,918
0
12,297
1,148,832
0
0
653,594
562,632
1,207,736
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,494,079
1,491,515
5,798
5,643
4,167
11,119
7,004
46,972
41,365
26,951
31,755
25,460
30,372
17,522
20,273
20,566
19,735
25,449
20,598
27,033
24,399
24,504
189,156
213,639
208,140
27,861
25,699
29,302
25,203
24,660
26,694
23,510
22,212
21,496
21,676
21,202
2,266
73,970
62,120
64,788
2,542,201
2,313,740
1,985,604
2,253,745
3,481,300
3,859,153
3,502,477
0
0
264,532
244,440
1,162,504
218,035
48,016
7,779
25
2,116
2,528
9,097
6,694
2,136
0
8,814
10,029
16,518
36,332
41,427
202,062
135,058
851,495
827,741
509,843
1,034,743
809,586
907,556
736,226
1,131,809
248,623
43,902
384,883
322,953
395,513
286,235
476,905
549,525
52,908
119,959
5,388
19,254
0
0
0
0
1,585
1,061
17,500
20,646
49
11,749
14,231
227,407
393,402
434,248
445,022
445,106
440,635
357,128
260,233
276,357
536,632
522,965
175,722
168,402
144,763
46,693
48,189
28,155
2,737
28,476
25,689
28,700
23,104
24,129
22,405
83,940
87,785
38,525
80,653
84,266
7,265
7,306
0
4,190
4,478
4,129
9,298
2,350,354
2,139,931
0
510,097
529,956
521,597
1,073,210
892,606
701,996
713,787
674,902
1,057,904
633,231
0
307,682
226,370
0
0
0
0
1,494,079
1,491,515
5,798
5,643
4,167
11,119
7,004
46,972
41,365
26,951
31,755
25,460
30,372
17,522
20,273
20,566
19,735
25,449
20,598
27,033
24,399
24,504
189,156
213,639
208,140
27,861
25,699
29,302
25,203
24,660
26,694
23,510
22,212
21,496
21,676
21,202
2,266
73,970
62,120
64,788
2,542,201
2,313,740
1,985,604
2,253,745
3,481,300
3,859,153
3,502,477
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
227,407
393,402
434,248
445,022
445,106
440,635
357,128
260,233
276,357
536,632
522,965
175,722
168,402
144,763
46,693
48,189
28,155
2,737
28,476
25,689
28,700
23,104
24,129
22,405
83,940
87,785
38,525
80,653
84,266
7,265
7,306
0
4,190
4,478
4,129
9,298
2,350,354
2,139,931
0
510,097
529,956
521,597
1,073,210
892,606
701,996
713,787
674,902
1,057,904
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
tCO2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,458,545
2,237,602
1,920,263
2,179,581
3,366,741
3,732,160
3,387,221
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,854
11,857
13,088
13,413
13,229
13,096
10,614
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,243,866
0
19,735
1,277,961
0
0
585,818
640,342
1,372,395
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
990,572
1,316,128
4,576
4,152
4,785
7,691
6,308
32,026
35,388
17,760
23,647
17,007
22,680
14,421
21,144
17,424
21,752
27,789
17,115
27,148
22,659
22,748
115,694
115,929
126,463
22,250
20,184
20,913
20,588
17,846
18,784
22,801
15,180
15,105
19,881
20,142
0
59,777
61,280
57,245
1,281,976
2,461,963
2,537,539
2,719,176
4,149,579
3,132,048
4,035,707
0
0
254,843
256,122
1,022,805
7,396
183,719
60
0
7,999
20,870
22,009
12,513
9,452
0
29,446
0
13,301
93,991
126,050
182,618
509,711
943,042
658,483
728,557
1,104,244
810,850
716,739
663,434
1,064,827
356,332
166,511
501,449
502,474
482,390
333,466
391,256
556,310
122,901
309,594
200,169
0
27,900
57,760
0
0
0
0
28,843
29,595
0
14,079
14,285
247,321
458,024
435,863
425,057
432,315
430,105
461,426
293,521
202,590
372,962
419,468
169,610
175,535
135,255
38,255
43,691
26,744
15,504
9,680
27,740
29,940
18,363
23,355
23,375
82,345
73,932
38,309
60,557
59,997
6,178
6,157
798
4,130
4,070
3,586
9,114
1,769,499
2,382,513
0
496,279
566,959
435,958
854,950
1,089,656
659,094
709,958
684,210
956,997
788,105
0
350,020
295,249
0
0
0
0
990,572
1,316,128
4,576
4,152
4,785
7,691
6,308
32,026
35,388
17,760
23,647
17,007
22,680
14,421
21,144
17,424
21,752
27,789
17,115
27,148
22,659
22,748
115,694
115,929
126,463
22,250
20,184
20,913
20,588
17,846
18,784
22,801
15,180
15,105
19,881
20,142
0
59,777
61,280
57,245
1,281,976
2,461,963
2,537,539
2,719,176
4,149,579
3,132,048
4,035,707
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
247,321
458,024
435,863
425,057
432,315
430,105
461,426
293,521
202,590
372,962
419,468
169,610
175,535
135,255
38,255
43,691
26,744
15,504
9,680
27,740
29,940
18,363
23,355
23,375
82,345
73,932
38,309
60,557
59,997
6,178
6,157
798
4,130
4,070
3,586
9,114
1,769,499
2,382,513
0
496,279
566,959
435,958
854,950
1,089,656
659,094
709,958
684,210
956,997
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
tCO2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,239,790
2,380,947
2,454,036
2,629,696
4,013,029
3,028,981
3,902,903
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,454
13,805
13,137
12,811
12,849
12,783
13,714
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,056,887
0
11,726
1,293,977
0
0
474,667
779,208
1,265,619
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
721,152
1,054,569
2,540
1,893
4,693
9,196
3,934
23,073
28,743
17,643
23,118
13,217
15,252
11,156
18,903
18,871
19,177
23,442
7,782
26,050
22,579
22,659
144,964
113,697
156,480
24,411
21,555
22,956
20,557
18,802
21,987
24,011
17,297
11,573
22,688
22,382
0
48,198
51,204
48,452
2,895,861
2,625,679
2,625,806
2,468,326
4,105,522
3,599,866
3,998,130
0
0
318,360
319,636
1,113,843
211,509
149,061
0
0
20,427
28,071
42,758
58,993
8,786
0
21,919
14,051
41,963
39,711
226,543
221,730
609,119
807,711
939,744
951,891
1,120,143
861,482
711,258
583,622
1,044,658
336,483
479,915
266,712
495,540
439,247
269,463
306,767
420,657
212,480
288,995
296,719
82,294
91,979
137,485
29,677
0
0
0
15,978
16,178
926
12,925
15,223
250,911
432,451
459,255
432,841
373,843
327,708
375,955
265,762
103,714
252,647
273,967
126,966
159,222
107,485
36,401
33,666
21,601
18,246
3,039
28,050
27,701
15,903
20,227
20,236
64,424
64,894
37,126
62,107
54,273
5,512
5,531
0
3,386
3,537
3,084
7,990
2,391,908
2,359,634
0
561,327
527,446
553,009
480,297
1,052,247
668,374
723,927
762,091
1,065,060
851,608
34,618
404,571
35,189
0
0
0
0
721,152
1,054,569
2,540
1,893
4,693
9,196
3,934
23,073
28,743
17,643
23,118
13,217
15,252
11,156
18,903
18,871
19,177
23,442
7,782
26,050
22,579
22,659
144,964
113,697
156,480
24,411
21,555
22,956
20,557
18,802
21,987
24,011
17,297
11,573
22,688
22,382
0
48,198
51,204
48,452
2,895,861
2,625,679
2,625,806
2,468,326
4,105,522
3,599,866
3,998,130
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250,911
432,451
459,255
432,841
373,843
327,708
375,955
265,762
103,714
252,647
273,967
126,966
159,222
107,485
36,401
33,666
21,601
18,246
3,039
28,050
27,701
15,903
20,227
20,236
64,424
64,894
37,126
62,107
54,273
5,512
5,531
0
3,386
3,537
3,084
7,990
2,391,908
2,359,634
0
561,327
527,446
553,009
480,297
1,052,247
668,374
723,927
762,091
1,065,060
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
tCO2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,515,019
2,515,019
2,515,019
2,515,019
3,772,528
3,772,528
3,772,528
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,562
13,034
13,842
13,046
11,111
9,740
11,174
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,532,149
0
5,662
1,441,358
0
0
304,110
585,065
1,324,643
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,149,737
834,327
4,876
3,184
4,533
10,652
2,472
34,411
28,460
24,287
25,068
16,880
19,567
14,430
20,657
20,563
22,308
25,296
13,584
31,183
24,856
18,959
153,818
130,280
148,620
21,893
23,086
24,227
23,379
20,002
22,355
23,674
30,838
1,852
24,984
20,348
0
64,103
44,884
41,260
2,450,688
1,970,214
2,420,249
2,472,291
4,021,292
3,906,484
4,336,995
0
0
286,659
351,827
965,502
226,648
193,799
0
0
74,706
23,323
70,864
31,819
8,623
0
21,563
19,383
52,714
35,491
264,988
229,826
699,000
650,105
738,452
667,761
1,000,433
685,849
865,996
891,791
1,182,996
454,292
425,678
260,051
545,602
389,725
430,443
421,027
554,804
224,908
54,152
410,962
233,690
142,264
47,797
173,231
0
6,655
3,813
12,659
23,088
0
7,669
12,314
247,810
459,163
433,622
453,050
435,831
420,690
378,010
264,400
274,217
297,818
252,403
147,513
167,299
127,903
34,273
34,941
23,281
6,970
0
36,018
35,814
16,380
20,786
21,192
64,726
82,114
37,551
52,967
56,560
6,734
6,744
0
4,000
3,554
3,587
8,081
2,546,770
2,582,002
0
576,774
525,121
465,465
926,173
755,806
651,556
358,882
522,241
553,370
1,242,581
618,499
1,006,663
170,684
275,695
155,994
290,015
128,011
1,149,737
834,327
4,876
3,184
4,533
10,652
2,472
34,411
28,460
24,287
25,068
16,880
19,567
14,430
20,657
20,563
22,308
25,296
13,584
31,183
24,856
18,959
153,818
130,280
148,620
21,893
23,086
24,227
23,379
20,002
22,355
23,674
30,838
1,852
24,984
20,348
0
64,103
44,884
41,260
2,450,688
1,970,214
2,420,249
2,472,291
4,021,292
3,906,484
4,336,995
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
247,810
459,163
433,622
453,050
435,831
420,690
378,010
264,400
274,217
297,818
252,403
147,513
167,299
127,903
34,273
34,941
23,281
6,970
0
36,018
35,814
16,380
20,786
21,192
64,726
82,114
37,551
52,967
56,560
6,734
6,744
0
4,000
3,554
3,587
8,081
2,546,770
2,582,002
0
576,774
525,121
465,465
926,173
755,806
651,556
358,882
522,241
553,370
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
tCO2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,478,628
2,478,628
2,478,628
2,478,628
3,717,941
3,717,941
3,717,941
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,469
13,839
13,069
13,655
12,954
12,504
11,235
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,291,349
0
5,566
1,390,530
0
0
286,417
968,684
957,847
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Annex 3. Table 9
RUKN (National Electricity Plan) 2005-2025
JAMALI Interconnected Grid
Year>>
Existing
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
730
50
10
945
720
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
200
1460
60
660
400
730
730
200
1000
1000
400
1000
660
500
660
500
1320
1320
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
1000
600
1000
1320
1320
1320
2000
2000
2000
Committed Capacity Additions (MW)

PLN
Private
OCGT
CCGT
Geothermal
Steam
CCGT
Geothermal
1920
Planned Capacity Additions (MW)

OCGT
CCGT
Geothermal
Steam
Hydro
Nuclear
120
290
145
275
400
180
730
500
1200
400
600
1000
1320
1000
1320
2640
2640
1320
1000
1000
2000
1000
2000
2640
Total Annual Capcity Additions (MW)

Hydro
OCGT
CCGT
Steam
Geothermal
Nuclear
Totals
Cumulative
2,559
876
5,985
8,460
797
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
875
1920
120
0
0
0
325
0
300
0
0
0
1345
0
180
0
0
0
1450
500
0
0
0
200
1460
660
60
0
0
400
730
1200
0
0
500
0
730
660
0
0
500
200
1000
660
0
0
0
0
1000
1320
0
0
0
400
1000
1320
0
0
0
0
0
1320
0
0
0
400
0
1320
0
1000
0
0
1000
2640
0
1000
0
0
0
2640
0
2000
0
0
1000
1320
0
1000
0
0
0
0
0
2000
0
0
0
2640
0
0
0
600
0
1320
0
2000
0
0
1000
1320
0
2000
0
600
1000
1320
0
2000
18,677
Existing
18,677
2005
18,677
2,915
2006
21,592
625
2007
22,217
1,525
2008
23,742
1,950
2009
25,692
2,380
2010
28,072
2,330
2011
30,402
1,890
2012
32,292
2,360
2013
34,652
2,320
2014
36,972
2,720
2015
39,692
1,320
2016
41,012
2,720
2017
43,732
4,640
2018
48,372
4,640
2019
53,012
3,320
2020
56,332
2,000
2021
58,332
2,640
2022
60,972
3,920
2023
64,892
4,320
2024
69,212
4,920
2025
74,132
2,559
876
6,860
10,380
917
-
2,559
876
7,185
10,380
1,217
-
2,559
876
8,530
10,380
1,397
-
2,559
876
9,980
10,880
1,397
-
2,559
1,076
11,440
11,540
1,457
-
2,559
1,476
12,170
12,740
1,457
-
3,059
1,476
12,900
13,400
1,457
-
3,559
1,676
13,900
14,060
1,457
-
3,559
1,676
14,900
15,380
1,457
-
3,559
2,076
15,900
16,700
1,457
-
3,559
2,076
15,900
18,020
1,457
-
3,559
2,476
15,900
19,340
1,457
1,000
3,559
2,476
16,900
21,980
1,457
2,000
3,559
2,476
16,900
24,620
1,457
4,000
3,559
2,476
17,900
25,940
1,457
5,000
3,559
2,476
17,900
25,940
1,457
7,000
3,559
2,476
17,900
28,580
1,457
7,000
3,559
3,076
17,900
29,900
1,457
9,000
3,559
3,076
18,900
31,220
1,457
11,000
3,559
3,676
19,900
32,540
1,457
13,000
40,776
4,231
28,492
2,829
17,347
47,223
4,105
28,730
3,300
16,839
46,304
5,342
31,353
5,891
18,383
47,130
6,168
34,948
8,136
19,298
50,209
6,181
41,319
8,149
19,003
54,134
6,059
47,793
8,500
18,778
61,440
6,007
51,438
8,448
18,929
66,546
6,776
55,789
9,217
19,797
71,516
7,410
61,382
9,851
20,731
80,111
7,332
65,646
9,773
20,345
88,975
7,524
70,840
9,965
20,897
98,808
8,685
72,581
11,126
22,834
93,675
100,197
107,273
115,680
124,861
135,264
146,262
158,125
170,890
183,207
198,201
214,034
107,637
8,842
73,341
11,283
22,898
5,664
229,665
123,942
7,802
76,162
10,243
21,100
7,252
246,501
140,621
7,136
75,163
9,577
19,869
11,842
264,208
149,342
7,184
79,615
9,625
19,716
17,146
282,628
152,163
10,006
83,848
12,447
23,731
19,968
302,163
170,024
10,521
84,621
12,962
24,292
20,484
322,904
179,661
11,487
86,857
13,928
26,323
26,705
344,961
189,103
12,256
92,391
14,696
27,278
32,730
368,454
198,542
13,022
98,709
15,463
29,023
38,752
393,511
Cumulative Annual Planned Capacity by Power Plant Type
Hydro
OCGT
CCGT
Steam
Geothermal
Nuclear
MW
2,559
876
5,985
8,460
797
-
2,559
876
5,985
8,460
797
-
Total Annual Planned Electricity Generation by Fuel Type

GWh
Coal
Water
Natural Gas
Geothermal
Oil
Uranium
Total
Cumulative Annual Planned Electricity Generation Mix by Fuel Type

2005
43.5%
4.5%
30.4%
3.0%
18.5%
0.0%
7.5%
92.5%
Coal
Water
Natural Gas
Geothermal
Oil
Uranium
Renewable
Not-Renewable
2006
47.1%
4.1%
28.7%
3.3%
16.8%
0.0%
7.4%
92.6%
2007
43.2%
5.0%
29.2%
5.5%
17.1%
0.0%
10.5%
89.5%
2008
40.7%
5.3%
30.2%
7.0%
16.7%
0.0%
12.4%
87.6%
2009
40.2%
5.0%
33.1%
6.5%
15.2%
0.0%
11.5%
88.5%
2010
40.0%
4.5%
35.3%
6.3%
13.9%
0.0%
10.8%
89.2%
2011
42.0%
4.1%
35.2%
5.8%
12.9%
0.0%
9.9%
90.1%
2012
42.1%
4.3%
35.3%
5.8%
12.5%
0.0%
10.1%
89.9%
2013
41.8%
4.3%
35.9%
5.8%
12.1%
0.0%
10.1%
89.9%
2014
43.7%
4.0%
35.8%
5.3%
11.1%
0.0%
9.3%
90.7%
2015
44.9%
3.8%
35.7%
5.0%
10.5%
0.0%
8.8%
91.2%
2016
46.2%
4.1%
33.9%
5.2%
10.7%
0.0%
9.3%
90.7%
2017
46.9%
3.8%
31.9%
4.9%
10.0%
2.5%
8.8%
88.8%
2018
50.3%
3.2%
30.9%
4.2%
8.6%
2.9%
7.3%
89.7%
2019
53.2%
2.7%
28.4%
3.6%
7.5%
4.5%
6.3%
89.2%
2020
52.8%
2.5%
28.2%
3.4%
7.0%
6.1%
5.9%
88.0%
2021
50.4%
3.3%
27.7%
4.1%
7.9%
6.6%
7.4%
86.0%
2022
52.7%
3.3%
26.2%
4.0%
7.5%
6.3%
7.3%
86.4%
2023
52.1%
3.3%
25.2%
4.0%
7.6%
7.7%
7.4%
84.9%
2024
51.3%
3.3%
25.1%
4.0%
7.4%
8.9%
7.3%
83.8%
2025
50.5%
3.3%
25.1%
3.9%
7.4%
9.8%
7.2%
82.9%
2006
11.9%
4.1%
31.8%
48.1%
4.2%
0.0%
16.1%
83.9%
2007
11.5%
3.9%
32.3%
46.7%
5.5%
0.0%
17.0%
83.0%
2008
10.8%
3.7%
35.9%
43.7%
5.9%
0.0%
16.7%
83.3%
2009
10.0%
3.4%
38.8%
42.3%
5.4%
0.0%
15.4%
84.6%
2010
9.1%
3.8%
40.8%
41.1%
5.2%
0.0%
14.3%
85.7%
2011
8.4%
4.9%
40.0%
41.9%
4.8%
0.0%
13.2%
86.8%
2012
9.5%
4.6%
39.9%
41.5%
4.5%
0.0%
14.0%
86.0%
2013
10.3%
4.8%
40.1%
40.6%
4.2%
0.0%
14.5%
85.5%
2014
9.6%
4.5%
40.3%
41.6%
3.9%
0.0%
13.6%
86.4%
2015
9.0%
5.2%
40.1%
42.1%
3.7%
0.0%
12.6%
87.4%
2016
8.7%
5.1%
38.8%
43.9%
3.6%
0.0%
12.2%
87.8%
2017
8.1%
5.7%
36.4%
44.2%
3.3%
2.3%
11.5%
86.2%
2018
7.4%
5.1%
34.9%
45.4%
3.0%
4.1%
10.4%
85.5%
2019
6.7%
4.7%
31.9%
46.4%
2.7%
7.5%
9.5%
83.0%
2020
6.3%
4.4%
31.8%
46.0%
2.6%
8.9%
8.9%
82.2%
2021
6.1%
4.2%
30.7%
44.5%
2.5%
12.0%
8.6%
79.4%
2022
5.8%
4.1%
29.4%
46.9%
2.4%
11.5%
8.2%
80.3%
2023
5.5%
4.7%
27.6%
46.1%
2.2%
13.9%
7.7%
78.4%
2024
5.1%
4.4%
27.3%
45.1%
2.1%
15.9%
7.2%
76.9%
2025
4.8%
5.0%
26.8%
43.9%
2.0%
17.5%
6.8%
75.7%
Cumulative Annual Planned Capacity Mix by Power Plant Type
Hydro
OCGT
CCGT
Steam
Geothermal
Nuclear
Renewable
Not-Renewable
Existing
13.7%
4.7%
32.0%
45.3%
4.3%
0.0%
2005
13.7%
4.7%
32.0%
45.3%
4.3%
0.0%
18.0%
82.0%
Worksheet: Table 9
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 9
RUKN (National Electricity Plan) 2005-2025
JAMALI Interconnected Grid
Planned Gnerating Capacity (MW). JAMALI Grid. 2005-2025

80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Existing
Planned Generation Mix (Electrical Energy). JAMALI Grid. 2005-2025

100%
90%
80%
Uranium
70%
Oil
60%
Geothermal
50%
Natural Gas
40%
Water
30%
Coal
20%
10%
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
0%
Planned Generation Mix (Installed Electrical Capacity). JAMALI Grid. 2005-2025

100%
90%
80%
Nuclear
70%
Geothermal
60%
CCGT
50%
40%
OCGT
30%
Hydro
20%
Steam
10%
Worksheet: Table 9b
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Existing
0%
15 June 2006
Annex 3. Table 10. Non-condensable Gas Emissions from Geothermal Power Plants
Table 10.1. Darajat Unit II
DARAJAT NCG ANALYSES RESULTS 2004
LOCATION
Water
WHP
Gas
(Barg)
Fraction
Vapor
DATE
CO2
H2S
NH3
Ar
N2
CH4
H2
Total Gas in Steam

CO2 / H2S
MMOLES / MOLE TOTAL GAS
mmol /
100mol
WT%
Unit II Interface
17-Feb-04
14.80
0.0022
N/A
887.78
67.63
0.95
0.05
7.47
1.32
34.80
13.13
221.9
0.514
Unit II Interface
5-Mar-04
14.81
0.0022
N/A
878.94
74.64
0.55
0.05
9.35
1.51
34.95
11.78
220.61
0.509
Unit II Interface
5-Mar-04
14.81
0.0022
N/A
873.17
78.44
0.72
0.05
9.01
1.53
37.08
11.13
222.33
0.512
Unit II Interface
5-Mar-04
14.81
0.0023
N/A
860.73
81.99
0.78
0.06
10.67
1.81
43.97
10.50
230.21
0.525
Unit II Interface
16-Jun-04
14.69
0.0023
N/A
879.20
75.14
0.54
0.05
7.62
1.28
36.16
11.70
232.91
0.538
Unit II Interface
17-Sep-04
14.68
0.0022
N/A
872.54
82.62
0.83
0.03
7.35
1.32
35.32
10.56
218.33
0.503
Unit II Interface
23-Dec-04
14.63
0.0026
N/A
915.30
43.90
1.23
0.03
5.33
1.27
32.95
20.85
264.25
0.62
881.09
44
72.05
34
0.80
17
0.05
39.9
8.12
28
1.43
16
36.46
2
Average
Molecular Weight
0.531
Totals
product 38768.1196 2449.70606 13.5816729 1.87195171 227.247588 22.9356202 72.9217906 41556.3843

% (wt)
93.2904
5.8949
0.0327
0.0045
0.5468
0.0552
0.1755
100.000
Global warming potential
1
0
0
0
0
21
0
Eqyivalent %age
93.2904
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.1590
0.0000
94.4494
Total steam consumed in 2004
Total CO2 equivalent produced
Total electricity
4,764,469 tonne
23,903 tonne
793,062 MWh
0.0301400 tonne CO2/MWh
Table 10.2. Gunung Salak Units 1, 2 & 3

Gunung Salak - Recent Data
Units 1-3
Lbs CO2
Per 1000 pounds/hr steam
Lbs CH4
3.74
0.011
340
Table 10.3. Gunung Salak Units 4, 5 & 6

Units 4-6
Lbs CO2
Per 1000 pounds/hr steam
Lbs CH4
20.5
0.12
170.833333
Table 10.4. Wayang Windu Unit 1

Wayang Windu - Assumed Data
% NCG
Per 100 kg/s steam to plant
%CO2
1
CO2/CH4
93% 214.629243
Worksheet: Table 10
15 June 2006
CDM Executive Board
page 56
Annex 4
MONITORING PLAN
The requirements of ACM0002 (Version 6) are followed. Refer to Section D.

CDM PDD DRJ 15june06

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

CDM PDD DRJ 15june06

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

General description of project activity

Application of a baseline methodology

Duration of the project activity / Crediting period

Application of a monitoring methodology and plan

Estimation of GHG emissions by sources

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

SECTION A. General description of project activity

Title of the project activity:

Darajat Unit III Geothermal Project.

Description of the project activity:

Purpose of Project Activity:

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

A summary of the four national criteria is given below:

The scope of evaluation is the area directly impacted by the project.

To promote implementation of programs on energy diversification or conservation

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

Name of Party involved

The Government of Indonesia

The Government of the United

Private and/or public entity(ies)

Chevron Geothermal Indonesia,

PT. Darajat Geothermal

Chevron Limited (registered in

Kindly indicate if the Party

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

Technical description of the project activity:

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity:

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

A.4.4. Brief explanation of how the anthropogenic emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse

The proposed project activity is not undertaken as a CDM project activity

Refer to Footnotes 12 and 13.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting

Annual estimation of emission reductions in

Total estimated reductions (tonnes CO2equ)

Total number of crediting years

7 years (first crediting period)

Annual average estimated reductions (tonnes

A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity:

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

SECTION B. Application of a baseline methodology

This methodology is applicable to capacity additions to grid-connected renewable power generation

Version 6 dated 19 May 2006. Downloaded from:

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02

CDM Executive Board