Publicat de
Universitatea Tehnica Gh. Asachi, Iasi
Tomul XLVII (LI), Supliment, 2001
Sectia
CONSTRUCTII DE MASINI
errors,
compensation,
measuring
instrument,
1. Introduction
The manufacturing accuracy on machine tools is determined by two
categories of errors [1]:
- Systematic errors, like the tools wear, thermal and elastic deformations of
machine tool, geometric errors and measuring error, outlined errors and dynamic
errors;
- Random errors, due to the tool breaking, errors caused by nonhomogeneus manufactured material, errors caused by programing of machine
tools, eroror of fastening of piece.
With respect to ensure that the processed pieces are in tolerance limit
request by designer, the necessary to make the systematic errors compensation
34
Constructii
and to prevent random errors appearance [2]. Geometric errors belong to the
systematic errors category of machine tools.
2. General Comments on Geometric Error of Machine Tool
Murphy observe in paper [3], geometric errors effects can contribute more
than 40% to the entire sources of machine errors, accordingly to Figure 1.
Alg
Table 1
Key to errors
Linear axis alignments
Ang
Ax
Beta
Clnt
En
de Masini
Ge
Table 1
(continuation)
Machine geometry
Ma
Pch
Pos
Rad
R&F
Sp
Str
Th
Tlt
Tr
XYZ
Linear X, Y, Z axes
35
36
Constructii
de Masini
37
38
Constructii
de Masini
39
(1)
1
0
A=
0
0 0 dx
1
1 0 dy
B=
0 1 dz
0 0 1
0
dx
dy
dz
The position vectors of the sensor scan heads in the S-coordinate system
are:
(2)
When multiplying these vectors by the matrix B the position of the vectors
with respect to the EC coordinate system can be obtained. By finding the
Jacobian and its inverse, the position can be extracted.
4. Conclusions
This method suppose the real time geometric errors measurement and
compensation of machine tools. Through this method application, resulting a
series of advantages:
- Can provide direct error detections;
- Large measurement range;
- Simultaneous detection of three liniar and three angular motions;
40
Constructii
REFERENCES
1. Z e t u D., C a r a t a E., Sisteme flexibile de fabricatie. Ed. Junimea, Iasi, 1998.
2. S a r t o r i S., Z h a n g G X., Geometric Error Measurement and Compensation of
Machines. Annals of the CIRP, 44, 2, pp. 599-609 (1995).
3. M u r p h y S D., In-Process measurement and Control. Textron, Inc. Danville,
Pennsylvania, 1990.
4. Y a m a z a k i K. et al., A study on the Developement of Three Dimensional Linear
Encoder System for In-Process Motion Error Calibration and Compensation of
Machine Tool Axes. Annals of the CIRP, 49, 1, pp. 403-406 (2000).
5. S p i e s A., Lngen in der Ultraprzisionstechnik messen. Feinwerktechnik &
Messtechnik, 98, 10, pp. 406-410 (1990).