Would you be interested in the inside scoop on goals at work? Would you like to know what we knew
about goals 40 years ago, versus what we know now? Would it surprise you to know that all that stuff
about SMART goals is only partially correct? In fact the whole premise for goals is based on shaky
ground. So what if I set the record straight based upon actual data? If you keep reading, I promise to
make this white paper to the point and very applicable to using goals at work this year. Lets check off
whats been discovered about goals and well finish with a quick cheat sheet to use going forward.
40 Years Ago: This is a summary of what we knew from research on goals at work as of 1975(1)
1. Goals work. Production is significantly higher when work is structured around goals.
2. Goals require buy-in and follow-up. Performance only improves for employees when they
accept the goals, and when they are supported and encouraged by their superiors.
3. Goals are self-fulfilling for high-achievers. Goals work best for people who have a previous track
record of success, people that are already high achievers, and are self- confidant. Belief about
ability to accomplish a goal is self-fulfilling. If you dont think of yourself as successful, you
wont be.
What we know as of 2015: Ive broken this down into 5 key themes, so its easy to remember.
The Efficacy of Smart (specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, time bound) Goals (2)
1. Although the acronym of SMART has a lot of common sense to it, there appears to be
insufficient data to confirm that SMART characteristics are tied to improved performance.
The whole process of setting goals based upon SMART definitions is a well-intentioned
methodology, but the SMART characteristics do not appear to be the critical characteristics
correlated with goal achievement or improved performance at work.
2. What does have research behind it is the concept that goals have to have emotions behind
them or they dont drive behavior. There are three emotions in particular that need to be
aroused at work to support goals having an impact. Goals with the following emotions attached
directly impact work behavior:
a. The first emotion is the anticipation of feeling very good, not just positive, but inspired
to accomplish something really meaningful.
b. The second emotion is one of being challenged by the stretch of the goal and
aspiration.
c. The third emotion is a link to helping. We have to feel like it is really going to help, and
even this drives goal behavior even stronger if it feels like we need to help in a way
thats absolutely necessary.
achieving goals. In at least one study, it served to make the talkers less likely to follow
through on the steps needed to reach a goal.
b. How are we being explicit about the assumptions behind a strategic goal and
testing/verifying that our assumptions are correct?
c. What are we going to do next, based upon the test results? Build it in actionable terms.
References
1. Latham, & Yukls A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations. You can
find it in the Academy of Management Journal 18.4 (1975): 824845;
http://www.managepro.com/what-the-research-says-about-you-goals/
2. http://www.managepro.com/most-of-what-youve-read-about-smart-goals-is-wrong/
3. http://www.managepro.com/what-makes-us-follow-through/
4. http://www.managepro.com/the-secret-to-raising-your-game/
5. http://www.managepro.com/the-hazards-of-talking-about-your-goals/
6. http://www.managepro.com/smart-goals-hard-goals-and-lost-goals/
7. http://www.managepro.com/category/strategicplanning/