Executive Summary:
The full-wave rectifier circuits purpose is to create maximum efficiency from electric current flow in
order to deliver maximum power. While it may seem complicated at first glance, the concept is fairly
simple. All circuits have a source which generates a voltage, which is needed in order for them to work.
There are two types of voltage sources: those which use direct current (DC) and those that use alternating
current (AC). In this case, we are using an AC supply. AC supplies create a waveform that generally
look something like what you see in the picture below.
One problem with this type of waveform is that only part of it is in the positive direction (above the xaxis) while the rest is in the negative direction (below the x-axis). The negative parts of the waveform
work against the positive parts, making the overall power supply much less than what we might want.
For example, if you were to sail a boat against the wind, the wind would slow you down since it is
blowing in the opposite, or negative, direction. This makes the boats overall distance over a period of
time less than it ought to be. However, what if there was a way to change the direction of the wind so that
it blew in the same direction as the boats direction of travel, so that it would actually increase your speed
and overall distance covered in the same timeframe? In terms of power transform, that is the exact
purpose of the full-wave rectifier. The circuit takes all the negative parts of the waveform and flips them
to positive, so that all of the waveform is working in the same direction. This maximizes the efficiency of
the power transferred. The picture below shows the transformation of the original AC waveform to the
desired waveform generated by the full-wave rectifier.
Essentially, the arrangement of the diodes (which only allow current to pass in one direction) ensures that
each polarity segment of the AC input signal will take a different path in the circuit. Those two separate
paths are then combined at a common point to produce a signal of only one polarity. In this circuit, that
common point is the center diode.
There are many ways in which this circuit can be built, however we chose to place the components onto a
prototyping board. A prototyping board is a thin board with holes arranged through its surface. On one
side of the board, the holes are surrounded by a copper trace. Each component was placed on the board in
accordance with the design, with its connections routed through the holes, and then soldered into place.
The excess length on each connection lead was clipped and saved. Once every component was in place,
the proper connections between them were made. For components that were in close proximity to each
other (such as the LEDs), spare leads were formed into jumpers that were soldered to the connection
points of each component. For longer lengths, wire was used. A picture of the top and bottom final
construction can be seen below:
Once the board was constructed, it was tested using the Tigerpaw Workstation. The Tigerpaw
Workstation consists of a standard PC with a Quansar Q4 hardware control board installed. It boots into a
real-time control environment called xPC, which is controlled by a laptop running MATLAB. The
workstation is known as the target, and the laptop the host. The host computer is able to send programs to
the target and receive information back. In this experiment, however, the host computer only sent output
to the target (sample waves to test for proper rectification). This is known as open-loop control.
A test program was developed that would utilize the Q4 board to generate several signals: a normal sine
wave, a square wave centered at 0 V, a square wave with a minimum of 0 V, and a triangular wave
centered at 0 V. Each waveform was 4 V peak-to-peak and 5 Hz.
The output of the Q4 board on the target PC had to be amplified in order to supply enough current to the
circuit. Although the external amplifier's gain was only set to 1, or unity gain, its high input resistance
ensured that the Q4 board only had to supply a minimal amount of current. The output of the Q4 board
was attached to the amplifier, which was in turn connected to our rectifier circuit.
Once the connections were properly made, the circuit was tested using the output waveforms. The
frequency of the waves was set to 5 Hz, so that the signal path could be directly observed through the
LEDs. For each waveform, three signals were captured with the oscilloscope: the input waveform, and the
signals observed from both the anode and cathode of the center diode in the rectifier. The signal observed
at the cathode was subtracted from the signal at the anode to obtain the rectified output.
Results and Discussion
This experiment required that the full wave rectifier be built and properly linked to the computer.
All of the discussion related to this topic is covered in the Materials and Methods section of this report.
As far as results are concerned, the rectifier worked exactly as expected. The following images were
taken from the oscilloscope and demonstrate the correct operation of the rectifier. All original waveforms
are shown first, with the rectified signal following. The rectified signal needed to be measured using two
channels. The orange and blue waveforms shown in the rectified picture are the two measured waveforms.
The red waveform is the combination of the two signals, the output waveform of our rectifier.
Sine Wave
These waveforms correctly show the operation of the rectifier All negative values are rectified to form a
fully positive waveform, just as you would expect. We did note that the LEDs required a higher current
to be turned on than the specified input signals could supply. This was easily fixed by increasing the input
voltage supplied through our xPC module. Once the current was high enough to drive the LEDs, the
lights started blinking.
Conclusion
The system appears to be a very powerful and flexible tool. It is capable of hard real time feedback and
provides consistent execution times. This gives the user precise control of the system components such as
motors. The software lets you simulate the system you are trying to design and provides a visual
representation. Matlab is used in place of C/C++ to simplify the programming process. Writing the driver
codes from scratch would require days of work, diverting attention away from the more important lessons.
Normally you would expect to see an expensive stand-alone system with specialized capabilities. Because
of this, however, a compromise is made in regards to its size and portability. In order to use this system
the user needs a laptop with Matlab/Simulink, a workstation, interface board, and an amplifier. It is
widely accepted that the more parts a system requires to perform a function, the more susceptible it will
be to failure. As many of the groups have discovered with the bridge circuit experiment, this system is no
exception. There were many areas left vulnerable to human error. It must be noted that this would leave to
an unfair assessment of the system since there was no formal training in its setup and use. Provided better
training, the experiment would have been far more productive. The largest consumer of time had to be
setting up the laptops. Because there are such a wide variety of laptops being used by students,
considerable trial and error was required to find the right combination of software what would work with
the multiple boot disk versions floating around. In summation, this experiment did very little in
demonstrating the potential of the Q4, but it is clear that it will be a very effective tool for the design
project.
ABET
Pts
Outcomes
10
20
30
40