A
Project Report
on
Design of low voltage operational amplifier for high
speed ADC
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment for the award of the Degree
Master of Technology
in
Mr.Abhishek C Math
(USN:2BV13LDT02)
Under the guidance of
Dr.Rajshekar.B.Shettar
B. V. BHOOMARADDI COLLEGE OF
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY HUBLI-31
2014-2015
B.V.BHOOMARADDI COLLEGE OF
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY HUBLI-31
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Project report entitled Design of low voltage
operational amplifier for high speed ADC is a bonafide work carried
out by Mr. Abhishek C Mathi bearing (USN: 2BV13LDT02) as a
part of VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYS M.Tech in
VLSI Design and Testing at B. V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering and
Technology, Vidyanagar, Hubli for the academic year 2014-2015.
Dr.Rajshekar.B.Shettar
Guide
Dr.Uma Mudenagudi
Head of the Department
Dr.Ashok Shettar
Principal
External Viva
Name of Examiners
1) ..................
2)..................
ABSTRACT
In this work, a high speed, low power fully differential folded cascode
Operational Amplifier was designed to be used in the A/D converter which
is supplied by 1V. It uses a folded cascode operational amplifier as well
as the gain boosting amplifier to improve the gain. Two fully differential
folded-cascode op amps with continuous time CMFBs are used as auxiliary
op amps to increase the open-loop gain of the main op amp. Common mode
feedback (CMFB) is used to stable the designed op-amp against temperature.
This design has been implemented in 130nm technology in Mentor Graphics.
Spectre simulation shows that the op-amp has the DC gain of greater than
100dB and the unity gain bandwidth greater than 900MHz.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mr.Abhishek C Math
Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2 Objective of the Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.3 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 Literature Survey
2.1 Simple Differential Amplifier . . . . .
2.2 Telescopic cascode op amps . . . . .
2.3 Folded cascode operational amplifier
2.4 Gain boosting Amplifier . . . . . . .
2.5 Two stage OTA . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.6 Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
2
2
2
4
. 5
. 5
. 7
. 8
. 9
. 10
3 Conclusion
14
3.1 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
iii
List of Figures
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
Differential Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telescopic cascode op amps . . . . . . . . . . .
cascode op amp with input and output shorted
PMOS diff pair folded cascode OTA . . . . . . .
NMOS diff pair folded cascode OTA . . . . . .
Gain boosting amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Two stage OTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proposed architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
iv
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 5
. 6
. 7
. 8
. 9
. 10
. 11
. 12
List of Tables
2.1
Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Chapter 1
Introduction
Op Amps play an important role in many analog and mixed-mode applications. The rapid growth of high speed and high resolution applications
such as ADC and DACs results in a necessary demand to the high speed and
high gain amplifiers. The realization of high-gain amplifiers with large GBW
in processes with decreasing supply voltage requires innovative circuit design
techniques and advances in IC process technology. Since op amps are usually employed to implement feedback systems, the open-loop gain of an op
amp determines the precision of the feedback system employing the op amp.
With a very high dc gain needed for precision applications, four approaches
for gain enhancement has received considerable attention for many years.
One is based upon gain multiplication achieved by cascading two or more
lower gain stages. Although high dc gains are achievable, the excess phase
shift introduced by the cascading introduces serious compensation requirements which limit the high frequency performance of cascaded amplifiers in
feedback applications. The second approach achieves gain enhancement by
increasing the output impedance of a basic gain stage. This approach has
proven most effective at achieving high gains and high GBW with favorable power dissipation (for medium accuracy). E. H. Armstrong, first time,
in 1914, presented positive feedback [1] and this method, several times, was
used in op-amps. Using positive feedback, dc gain can be increased a lot, but
it simply, can make op-amp structures unstable. Also, this method can decrease output swing the same as negative feedback in active cascode op-amps
[2]. Another commonly used gain enhancement technique is gain-boosting
[3]. Very high gains are achievable with gain-boosting but it still requires one
level of stacking of devices thereby making it difficult to operate with low
1
1.1
Problem Statement
To desing the low power high speed folded cascode gain boosting amplifier
for1V power supply to achieve a DC gain greater than 100dB and the UGB
grretaer than 900MHz. The design is to be implemented using 130nm technology in MentorGraphics tool. Tool: MentorGraphics Eldo tool.
1.2
To design the low power ,high speed folded cascode amplifier with the gain
boosting amplifier for ADC in 130nm technology. At reduced supply voltages,
output swing becomes an important parameter. At large supply voltages,
there is a trade off among speed, power and gain.
1.3
Methodology
CMFB circuit is done and the behaviour of each unit is verified by transient,
DC and AC analysis.
Chapter 2
Literature Survey
The differential amplifier is an important stage of a very large area of applications, including high-performances analog/mixed ICs, such as operational
amplifiers, voltage comparators, voltage regulators, video amplifiers, modulators and demodulators or A/D and D/A converters. The linearity of the
classical CMOS differential amplifier is relatively poor because of the fundamental nonlinear characteristic of MOS transistors, resulting the possibility
of achieving a relatively good linearity only for a restricted input voltage
range (the amplitude of the input voltage for the classic differential amplifier
using MOS transistors in saturation have to be below a few hundreds of mV).
Five commonly used operational amplifiers architectures are briefly presented here. Advantages and limitations of these architectures are also summarized and some solutions suggested in the literature to overcome these
limitations are also presented.[3] All these commonly used amplifiers shown
in this chapter are fully differential, and might need common mode feedback
circuits in practical applications. The performances of all of these different
commonly used configurations are summed up in Table 2.1. A brief literature review describing previously done work related to high gain operational
amplifier architectures and mechanisms is described in this chapter. Various
methods used for increasing the gain of the amplifier used in the literature
are presented along with the drawbacks of each method. A brief summary
of results from this review is also presented which leads to the motivation
for this particular work. Later in the chapter a brief description of various
operational amplifier parameters that determine the quality and usefulness
of the amplifiers is also provided as a guide. The difference between an Operational Transconductance Amplifier (OTA) and an Operational Amplifier
4
(op-amp) is that the op-amp has got an output buffer so that it is able to
drive resistive loads. An OTA can only drive capacitive loads
2.1
2.2
2.3
We saw that telescopic cascode OpAmps suffer from limited output swing.
Folded-cascode OpAmps allow more swing at the output. Although, this
topology consumes more power than telescopic topology due to its need for
another current source (M3 and M4 act as a current source). This topology
can be implemented either employing PMOS input devices or NMOS input
devices.[5] Each one has its advantages and disadvantages. In Figure 2.4 and
Figure 2.5 two implementation of folded-cascode topology are shown:
It can be seen that voltage swing in folded-cascode topology is higher than
telescopic topology by one overdrive voltage across current source. This gain
is about 2-3 times less the gain of telescopic OpAmps. One reason is the
lower transconductance of PMOS input devices compared to NMOS input
devices. Another reason is appearing of r01 in parallel with r02 , which will
reduce the output impedance of amplifier. One of the important benefits
of folded-cascode OpAmps is that their input CM level range is larger than
that of telescopic OpAmps. Depending on the kind of input device, input
CM level can be very close to one of the supply sources. In case of PMOS
input devices, input CM level can be zero and having NMOS input device,
OpAmp tolerate input CM level equal to . In general the choice of input
device depends on the application. Whether gain is the target or CM level
dictates the input device vdd.
2.4
2.5
2.6
Specification
10
11
12
13
Chapter 3
Conclusion
3.1
Conclusion
14
Bibliography
[1] K. Bult and G. J. G. M. Geelen, A Fast-Settling CMOS OpAmp for
SC Circuits with 90dB DC Gain Chines journal of semiconductors, Vol.
27, No. 5, pp. 778-782, 2006.
[2] A.D. Grasso,S. Pennisi, High-Performance CMOS Pseudo-Differential
Amplifier Circuits and Systems, ISCAS 2005. IEEE InternationalSymposium on, pp. 1569 1572, 23-26 May 2005.
[3] B.J. Hosticka, Improvement of the Gain of CMOS Amplifiers IEEE
Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-14, Issue 6, Dec.1979, pp.11111114. 1996.
[4] Behzad Razavi Design of analog cmos integrated circuits McGrawHill, 2001.
[5] Phillip E. Allen and Douglas R. Holberg CMOS analog circuit Design
McGraw-Hill, 2001.