a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 24 January 2013
Received in revised form 3 April 2013
Accepted 13 April 2013
Available online 28 April 2013
Keywords:
Edible lms
Wheat starch
Chitosan
Basil essential oil
Thyme essential oil
a-Tocopherol
Citric acid
ABTS
a b s t r a c t
Blend edible lms were prepared from wheat starch (WS) and chitosan (CH) with glycerol as plasticizer.
Four active ingredients (antioxidants) were added, namely basil essential oil, thyme essential oil, citric
acid and a-tocopherol. The starch:antioxidant mass ratio was 1:0.1. Prior to characterisation, the lms
were conditioned at 25 C53%RH as to their structural, mechanical, optical and barrier properties. The
antioxidant capacity of the active ingredients was determined by means of a spectrophotometric method.
The incorporation of antioxidants led to a heterogeneous lm microstructure, mainly in those containing
a-tocopherol, which affected the surface roughness. Yellowness was induced in lms when a-tocopherol
was added and no notable colour changes were observed in the other cases, although all the antioxidants
increased the transparency of the lms. Despite of the fact that the mechanical properties were barely
affected by the incorporation of antioxidants, citric acid promoted an increase in the elastic modulus
but a decrease in lm stretchability. The water vapour barrier properties of the lms were only slightly
improved when citric acid and a-tocopherol were added, whereas the oxygen barrier properties were signicantly improved in all cases. The greatest antioxidant capacity of the lms was reported for lms containing a-tocopherol, which exhibited the highest antioxidant power.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Edible lms or coatings are dened as thin layers of material
suitable for consumption, which act as a barrier against different
agents (water vapour, oxygen and moisture) thus increasing the
shelf-life of the product (Guilbert et al., 1996). Their use is a promising alternative in the eld of food preservation, allowing for the
reduction of waste plastics. Additionally, the incorporation of additives to these coatings, such as antimicrobials or antioxidant
agents, is potentially of interest (Baldwin et al., 1996).
Biodegradable polymers based on natural polysaccharides, particularly starch, can be produced at low cost and on a large scale.
The starch-based materials can reduce the use of non-renewable
resources. Furthermore, starch is one of the most abundant, natural
biopolymers. The starch granule is essentially composed of two
polysaccharides, amylose and amylopectin, and some minor components such as lipids and proteins. This polymer has attracted
considerable attention as a biodegradable thermoplastic polymer
(Angellier et al., 2006). The lms prepared from starch represent
promising applications in food packaging due to their biodegradability, low cost, exibility and transparency. However, several
authors have observed that, despite their ease of preparation,
272
The reactants for the antioxidant capacity assay Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid), K2S2O8 and
ABTS (20 2-azino-bis-[3-etilbenzotiazol-6-sulfonic acid]) were
supplied by SigmaAldrich (Madrid, Spain).
2.2. Experimental design and preparation of the lms
WS was diluted at 1% (w/w) in distilled water, and glycerol was
added in a starch:glycerol ratio of 1:0.15. This dispersion was
heated in a water bath at 95 C for 40 min to promote starch gelatinization. CH (1% w/w) was dispersed in an aqueous solution of
acetic acid (1% v/w) under magnetic stirring at 40 C and
450 rpm for 24 h. The two solutions were mixed in a mass ratio
WS:CH of 4:1. The active ingredients were added at 0.1 g/g of
starch. Hence, ve lm-forming dispersions (FFDs) were obtained,
namely WS:CH (control formulation), WS:CH:B (wheat
starch:chitosan:basil essential oil), WS:CH:Th (wheat starch:chitosan:thyme essential oil), WS:CH:CA (wheat starch:chitosan:citric
acid) and WS:CH:Tp (wheat starch:chitosan:a-tocopherol). All of
these were homogenised using rotorstator equipment (Yellow
Line DL 25 Basic, IKA, Janke y Kunkel, Germany) at 13,500 rpm
for 4 min and degassed at room temperature by means of a vacuum pump. In order to obtain the lms, the amount of FFD that
contain 1 g of solids were cast in framed and leveled polytetrauorethylene (PTFE) plates (150 mm of diameter), thus obtaining 1 g
of solids per plate in all cases. After drying for 48 h at 25 C and
50%RH, the lms were removed from the plates and conditioned
at 5 C58%RH or 25 C53%RH in cabinets containing saturated
solutions of Mg(NO3)2.
2.3. Characterisation of the lms
2.3.1. Film thickness
The lm thickness was measured using a Palmer digital
micrometer (Comecta, Barcelona, Spain) to the nearest 0.001 mm.
Four to six random positions were taken from each lm sample
and considered for the mechanical and barrier property assays.
2.3.2. Microstructure of the lms
The microstructural arrangement of the lm components was
studied by combining two techniques: scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). SEM micrographs
of the surfaces and cross-sections of the lms were obtained using
a JEOL JSM-5410 electron microscope (Japan). To observe the sections of the lms, the specimens were cryofractured by immersion
in liquid nitrogen. The samples were mounted on copper stubs,
gold coated and observed using an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
The surface of the lms was analysed by AFM using a Nanoscope III.a, Scanning Probe Microscope (Digital Instruments, Inc.
Santa Barbara, California). For each formulation, three samples
were cut (1 1 cm2). A three-dimensional image of a lm surface
area (50 50 lm2) was obtained in each test, and three images
were captured per formulation. Following the ASME B46.1 (1995)
method, the following statistical parameters describing the surface
roughness were calculated:
Average roughness (Ra): the arithmetic average of the absolute
values of the height deviations with respect to a mean surface (1).
Ra
1 XN
jZ j
J1 j
N
s
PN 2
J1 Z J
Rq
N
1
R0 R Rg
R
2
R0 Rg
p
a2 1
q
2
T i a R0 2 b
R1 a b
C ab
q
2
a2 b
b
hab arctg
a
8
2
273
WVTR
P D LnP p2 =P p1
R T Dz
10
WVP
WVTR
thickness
p2 p3
11
274
and chitosan are compatible polymers, able to form a homogeneous structure. The fact that the two polymers are highly compatible was previously observed by Bonilla et al. (2013). The addition
of active ingredients, which represent almost 7% of the total lm
solids, brought about some structural changes, as a function of
the nature of the added compound(s). Essential oils were integrated into the polymer matrix to differing degrees. The lm with
thyme essential oil (WS:CH:Th) did not show a marked phase separation, and it was only on the lm surface that coated lipid droplets were exhibited, resulting from the coalescence and creaming
of some droplets during the lm drying step; in the cross sections
of the lm, it was barely possible to observe very small lipid droplets. However, the lm with basil essential oil (WS:CH:B) exhibited
phase separation and the creaming of the oil was evident on the
lm surface, while oil droplets could be observed in the cross section of the polymer matrix. The incorporation of citric acid did not
lead to a highly heterogeneous starchchitosan lm (WS:CH:CA)
structure, although the lm surface and cross section appear coarser than for antioxidant-free lms. The greatest irregularities were
observed in the lms with a-tocopherol (WS:CH:Tp), due to its low
miscibility with the polymers and its different interactions with
each one. In fact, cross section micrographs of these lms showed
a two-layer separation: a smooth bottom layer, seeming to contain
a smaller amount of lipids, and a lipid-rich top layer. Likewise, big
droplets of one polymer phase containing a greater or smaller lipid
fraction can be observed in the other. This is especially clear at surface level and could indicate that polymers become more incompatible in the presence of a-tocopherol due to the different
interactions of this lipid with the polymer chains. A similar structural effect was observed for corn starchsodium caseinate blend
lms when a-tocopherol was added (Jimenez et al., 2013).
AFM images were obtained with the aim of quantifying the impact of active ingredients on the surface topography of the lms
(Fig. 3). The corresponding roughness parameters are shown in Table 1. The incorporation of the active compounds did not have a
relevant effect on the topography of the lm surface and, coherently, the roughness parameters were not affected with the only
WS:CH:B
WS:CH:Th
WS:CH:CA
WS:CH:Tp
275
WS:CH
WS:CH:B
WS:CH:Th
WS:CH:CA
WS:CH:Tp
exception of a- tocopherol. WS:CH:Tp lms exhibited a rough surface, with an important increase in all roughness parameters
(p < 0.05), which coincides with the previously described phase
separation phenomena.
3.2. Optical properties
The lm gloss is related to the surface morphology (SnchezGonzlez et al., 2010b) and generally, the smoother their surface,
the glossier the lms are. The gloss values at 60 are shown in Table 1. This angle was selected following norm ASTM D523 (1999). A
signicant reduction in gloss (p < 0.05) was observed to take place
after the addition of every active ingredient, but mainly after those
which were lipid in nature. Essential oils and a-tocopherol provoked a reduction in the gloss of the WS:CH lms of over
50%,which is coherent with the less miscible nature of these compounds with the polymers and the subsequent effect of the dispersed particles on the lm surface. Although AFM did not detect
a signicantly higher degree of roughness in lms with essential
oils, this could be due to the low mechanical resistance of the lipid
droplets at the surface, which made it impossible to detect during
the surface scanning of the probe.
Table 2 shows the lightness, chroma and hue of the lms. The
incorporation of the antioxidants did not affect these variables very
markedly. However, the most intense yellow colour and the highest chroma were observed in lms containing a-tocopherol. As a
consequence, the whiteness index was the lowest in these lms.
Typical spectra of the internal transmittance of the lms between 400 and 700 nm are shown in Fig. 4. There were similarities
not only between the shape of the spectra of lms with antioxidants, but also between these and that of the WS:CH lm, which
is coherent with the slight colour differences observed for every
lm. However, it was found that all the antioxidants brought about
some increase in the internal transmittance values. This could be
explained by the formation of a less compact structure, with a lower refraction index, which, in turn, became less opaque. This is
coherent with the measured lm thickness (Table 3) which reveals
that thicker lms were obtained when antioxidants were present
in their formulation, despite the constant amount of solid per surface unit. This effect that the compact nature of the matrix had on
the lm transparency was partially mitigated in the case of the lm
containing a-tocopherol, due to the greater light dispersion provoked by the more heterogeneous lm structure.
3.3. Mechanical properties
Mechanical parameters, elastic modulus (EM), and tensile (TS)
and deformation (E, %) at break are shown in Table 3 for every lm
obtained. The mechanical behaviour of WS:CH lms is similar to
that reported by Bonilla et al. (2013) for lms of similar composition. The incorporation of active ingredients had variable effects on
the mechanical parameters, depending on their specic nature and
effects on the lm microstructure. Thyme essential oil did not signicantly affect the mechanical response of the lms, apart from a
slight decrease in stretchability. The lms containing basil essential oil or a-tocopherol showed some increase in EM and TS, as
compared to WS:CH lms, with no effect on the elongation at
break. On the other hand, the addition of citric acid led to an in-
276
WS:CH
WS:CH:Th
WS:CH:B
WS:CH:Tp
WS:CH:CA
Table 1
Average roughness (Ra), rootmeansquare roughness (Rq), relative difference
between the real and the geometric surface area (ISAD) and gloss at 60 of the lms.
Mean values and standard deviation in brackets.
Samples
Rq (nm)
WS:CH
WS:CH:B
WS:CH:Th
WS:CH:CA
WS:CH:Tp
147
109
212
109
486
(41)ab
(35)a
(42)b
(23)a
(125)c
Ra (nm)
ISAD (%)
Gloss (60)
113 (38)ab
85 (27)a
172 (37)b
86 (18)a
371 (124)c
0.8 (0.3)a
1.4 (0.2)ab
1.22 (0.07)ab
0.89 (0.03)a
4 (3)b
51
19
13
31
13
(16)c
(14)a
(2)a
(18)b
(3)a
Table 2
Lightness (L), hue (hab ), chroma (C ab ) and whiteness index (WI) values of the lm.
Average values and standard deviations in brackets.
Samples
WS:CH
WS:CH:B
WS:CH:Th
WS:CH:CA
WS:CH:Tp
L
hab
a
82 (2)
88 (3)b
84.4 (0.4)ab
86.9 (0.6)b
83.0 (0.4)a
96.6
98.2
95.2
97.8
89.5
(0.6)
(0.9)a
(0.2)a
(0.6)a
(0.6)a
C ab
WI
10.3 (0.9)a
11 (5)a
12.8 (0.6)ab
10.0 (0.4)a
15.7 (0.9)b
79 (2)ab
84 (6)b
79.8 (0.6)ab
83.5 (0.5)b
76.8 (0.9)a
277
Table 5
Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) expressed as the amount (mg) of the
dry lm or compound which gives the same absorbance reduction as 1 mM Trolox
solution.
0.85
Ti
Antioxidant
WS:CH:B
0.80
WS:CH:Tp
WS:CH:CA
B
Th
CA
Tp
WS:CH
WS:CH:Th
0.75
0.70
400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620 640 660 680 700
(nm)
Fig. 4. Typical spectra of internal transmittance (Ti) of the lms.
Table 3
Tensile properties (elastic modulus: EM, tensile strength: TS and deformation: E %, at
break) and thickness of all lms equilibrated at 58% RH. Mean values and standard
deviations in brackets.
Samples
EM (MPa)
WS:CH
WS:CH:B
WS:CH:Th
WS:CH:CA
WS:CH:Tp
1458
1712
1450
1418
1598
(151)a
(46)b
(201)a
(605)a
(106)b
TS (MPa)
E (%)
44 (3)b
54.6 (1.2)c
43 (7)b
34 (12)a
47 (10)b
4.3
4.3
3.6
3.0
4.4
(0.8)b
(0,6)b
(0.6)a
(1.0)a
(1.4)b
Thickness (lm)
52.7 (1.6)a
57 (5)b
55 (11)b
52 (8)a
58 (5)b
Table 4
Moisture content (MC, g water/g dry lm) of lms equilibrated at 25 C53%RH.
Water vapor permeability (WVP, g mm kPa1 h1 m2) of the lms at 58100%RH
and 25 C and oxygen permeability (OP, cm3 mm2 atm1 day1) at 25 C53%RH.
Mean values and standard deviation in brackets.
Samples
WS:CH
WS:CH:B
WS:CH:Th
WS:CH:CA
WS:CH:Tp
WVP 1010
a
18 (2)
19.1 (1.4)a
18.2 (0.5)a
15.6 (1.0)b
15.6 (1.3)b
OP 102
6.7
3.7
3.2
3.8
3.8
(0.7)a
(1.0)b
(0.2)b
(0.7)b
(0.7)b
%MC
8.4 (0.5)a
8,67 (0.13)a
8.62 (0.16)a
8.8 (1.3)a
8.2 (0.3)a
TEAC (mg)
Pure antioxidant
Dry lm
Antioxidant in dry lm
1.93
1.58
1.93
0.54
245
145
177
96
15.9
9.4
11.5
6.2
278
References
Ahn, J.H., Kim, Y.P., Seo, E.M., Choi, Y.K., Kim, H.S., 2008. Antioxidant effect of natural
plant extracts on the microencapsulated high oleic sunower oil. Journal of
Food Engineering 84, 327334.
Angellier, H., Molina Boisseau, S., Dole, P., Dufresne, A., 2006. Thermoplastic starch
waxy maize starch nanocrystals nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 7, 531
539.
ASME B46.1, 1995. Surface Texture: Surface Roughness, Waviness and Lay, An
American National Standard, ASME, New York.
ASTM, 1995. Standard test methods for water vapor transmission of materials.
Standard Designations: E96-95. Annual Books of ASTM, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp.
406413.
ASTM, 1999. Standard test method for specular gloss. In Designation (D523). Annual
Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 06.01. American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, PA.
ASTM, 2001. Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. In
Standard D882. Annual Book of American Standard Testing Methods. American
Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 162170
ASTM, 2010. Standard test method for oxygen gas transmission rate through plastic
lm and sheeting using a coulometric sensor. Designations (3985-05).
Atars, L., Bonilla, J., Chiralt, A., 2010. Characterization of sodium caseinate-based
edible lms incorporated with cinnamon or ginger essential oils. Journal of Food
Engineering 100, 678687.
Atars, L., Prez-Masi, R., Chiralt, A., 2011. The role of some antioxidants in the
HPMC lm properties and lipid protection in coated toasted almonds. Journal of
Food Engineering 104, 649656.
Baldwin, E.A., Nisperos, M.O., Chen, X., Hagenmaier, R.D., 1996. Improving storage
life of cut apple and potato with edible coating. Postharvest Biology and
Technology 9, 15l163.
Bonilla, J., Atars, L., Vargas, M., Chiralt, A., 2012. Effect of essential oils and
homogenization conditions on properties of chitosan-based lms. Food
Hydrocolloids 26 (1), 916.
Bonilla, J., Atars, L., Vargas, M., Chiralt, A., 2013. Properties of wheat starch lmforming dispersions and lms as affected by chitosan addition. Journal of Food
Engineering 114 (3), 303312.
Butler, B.L., Vergano, P.J., Testin, R.F., Bunn, J.N., Wiles, J.N., 1996. Mechanical and
barrier properties of edible chitosan lms as affected by composition and
storage. Journal of Food Science 61, 953955.
Dutta, P.K., Tripathi, S., Mehrotra, G.K., Dutta, J., 2009. Perspectives for chitosan
based antimicrobial lms in food applications. Food Chemistry 114, 11731182.
Fabra, M.J., Talens, P., Gavara, R., Chiralt, A., 2012. Barrier properties of sodium
caseinate lms as affected by lipid composition and moisture content. Journal of
Food Engineering 109 (3), 372379.
Guilbert, S., Gontard, N., Gorris, L.G.M., 1996. Prolongation of shelf-life of perishable
food products using biodegradable lms and coatings. LebensmittelWissenschaft und-Technologie 29 (1,2), 1017.
Gutirrez, J., Barry-Ryan, C., Bourke, P., 2008. The antimicrobial efcacy of plant
essential oil combinations and interactions with food ingredients. International
Journal of Food Microbiology 124, 9197.
Hutchings, J.B., 1999. Food Colour and Appearance. Aspen Publishers, Maryland.
Jimenez, A., Fabra, M.J., Talens, P., Chiralt, A., 2013. Physical properties and
antioxidant capacity of starch-sodium caseinate lms containing lipids. Journal
of Food Engineering 116, 695702.
Kumar, M.N.V.R., 2000. A review of chitin and chitonan applications. Reactive and
Functional Polymers 46 (1), 127.
Mc Hugh, T.H., Avena-Bustillos, R., Krochta, J.M., 1993. Hydrophobic edible lms:
modied procedure for water vapor permeability and explanation of thickness
effects. Journal of Food Science 58 (4), 899903.
Parra, D.F., Tadini, C.C., Ponce, P., Lugo, A.B., 2004. Mechanical properties and water
vapor transmission in some blends of cassava starch edible lms. Carbohydrate
Polymers 58, 475481.
Pastor, C., Snchez-Gonzlez, L., Chiralt, A., Chfer, M., Gonzlez-Martnez, C., 2013.
Physical and antioxidant properties of chitosan and methylcellulose based lms
containing resveratrol. Food Hydrocolloids 30, 272280.
Perez-Gag, M.B., Krochta, J.M., 2001. Lipid particle size effect on water vapor
permeability and mechanical properties of whey protein/beeswax emulsion
lms. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49 (2), 9961002.
Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang, M., Rice-Evans, C., 1998.
Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decoloration
assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 26, 12311237.
Reddy, Narendra, Yang, Yiqi, 2010. Citric acid cross-linking of starch lms. Food
Chemistry 118 (3), 702711.
Snchez-Gonzlez, L., Gonzlez-Martnez, C., Chiralt, A., Chfer, M., 2010a. Physical
and antimicrobial properties of chitosan-tea tree essential oil composite lms.
Journal of Food Engineering 98 (4), 443452.
Snchez-Gonzlez, L., Chfer, M., Chiralt, A., Gonzlez-Martnez, C., 2010b. Physical
properties of edible chitosan lms containing bergamot essential oil and their
inhibitory action on Penicillium italicum. Carbohydrate Polymers 82, 277283.
Sanchez-Gonzalez, L., Vargas, M., Gonzlez-Martnez, C., Chiralt, A., Chfer, M.,
2011a. Use of essential oils in bioactive edible coatings. Food Engineering
Reviews 3, 116.
Sanchez-Gonzalez, L., Gonzlez-Martnez, C., Chiralt, A., Chafer, M., 2011b. Effect of
essential oils on properties of lm forming emulsions and lms based on
hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and chitosan. Journal of Food Engineering 105
(2), 246253.