17 55-81

2006

Team Accelerated Instruction, TAI

TAI
31
TAI

55

2003

1990
19941992
1998

199619961998

20032004
20021994

2000

56

17 2006

Team Accelerated Instruction, TAI

Slavin, 1985

Slavin, Madden & Leavey, 1983; Slavin et al., 1983; Slavin, 1983; Slavin & Karweit,
1984a; Slavin, Leavey & Madden, 1984; Nichols & Mill, 1993

TAI TAI

Team Accelerated Instruction, TAI

Student Team Learning Methods
team-assisted individualization

Team Accelerated Instruction

Slavin, 1985,
1995

57

individualized learning

19991990

Slavin, 1995

1990Slavin,
1985, 1995

1999

Slavin, 1995
Student Teams-Achievement Divisions, STAD
Teams-Games-Tournament, TGT IIJigsaw II
Learning Together, LT

Group Investigation, GI

Team-Assisted IndividualizationJohnson Johnson1994

positive interdependence

face-to-face interactionindividual accountability

interpersonal and small-group skillsgroup processing

58

17 2006

200320042002
1994Madden & Slavin, 1983; Slavin & Karweit, 1984a; Slavin et al., 1984; Hawkins
et al., 1988; Mevarech, 1991
2000 STAD

self-esteempeer-supportliking of class and of

classmates
Johnson, Johnson, Johnson,
& Anderson, 1976; Ryan & Wheeler, 1977

tutor
Slavin, 1995
TAI

TAI

TAI
Slavin1985,1995

59

TAI
TAI

TAI
Slavin, 1995
routine management
group

parallel
tests

aides
TAI

PressleyGhatala1990

TAI

60

17 2006

William, 1998

TAI

TAI
TAI TAI
1Slavin, Madden, & Leavey, 1983;
Slavin et al., 1983; Slavin, 1983; Slavin & Karweit, 1984a; Slavin, Leavey, & Madden,
1984; Nichols & Mill, 1993 TAI
TAI TAI

TAI
TAI
1

Slavin, Leavey &

Madden
Slavin, 1985

506

3-5

Slavin, Leavey &

Madden
Slavin, 1985

117

3-5

Slavin, Leavey &

Madden
Slavin, 1985
Slavin, Madden &
Leavey
Slavin, 1985

375

4-6

1,371

3-5

61

Slavin, Madden &

Leavey1982a

113

3-5

160

4-6

Oishi Slavin,
1985

120

4-6

TAI

Slavin & Karweit

Slavin,
1985
Slavin, & Karweit,
Slavin,
1985
Slavin 1982

354

4-6

480

3-5

119

3--5

TAI

18

Age
13-15

TAI
TAI

Oishi, Slavin &

Madden
Slavin, 1985

Salend Washin
1988

TAI

31 18
13 6 5 5

62

17 2006

TAI
TAI Nichols Mill
TAI Nichols & Mill, 1993 TAI
Slavin, 1985, 1995
http://www.charlesbridge.com/school/tai.student.htm
2003

TAI
2004
7 8
TAI
TAI
TAI

1. Damon1984

2. Slavin1995 TAI

3.1998

4.

TAI

TAI

TAI

63

2
2
TAI

8TAI

2 TAI

3 TAI

4 TAI

5 TAI

6TAI

7 TAI

1 TAI

TAI

30

64

17 2006

TAI

7
TAI

2004

1.

2.

3.

4. A 10
10 8
8

B A 10
5.

6. TAI

65

TAI
TAI

Trustworthiness
Lincoln Guba trustworthiness
credibility
transferability

dependabilityconfirmability
Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Dezin&
Lincoln, 1994; Maykut & Morehouse, 1994

13

66

17 2006

TAI

TAI

TAI
TAI
7 8 1-2 2
34 11 7 TAI
15
1117

A4 35

TAI

TAIq0608

7 TAI

67

Slavin1985, 1995 TAI

TAI

931105

1.
2. 2 1
2 2
3.
4.
5.

TAI
TAI 8
5 1 2 20
5

8 TAI

TAI
31 TAI
30

68

17 2006

TAI

8TAI

TAI 21
5 4 TAI

6 TAI TAI
q1503

TAI
q1528

TAI
q1512

501
4
TAI

q1524
TAI
q1526 4
q1508

TAI TAI

TAI

q1521TAI
Salend Washin1988 TAI 18 13 15
TAI
TAI

q1505
q1516

TAI

TAI

69

TAI
2TAI

11
q0901

q0903
2
16
q0920q0925
TAI
~
q0930

1996
1996TAI
30 16 TAI
TAI

q0905

q0901

q0909

q0914

2004 STAD
STAD

STAD 8 11 TAI
9 TAI TAI

70

17 2006

3 TAI

29
TAI TAI

14a3

TAI 5 TAI

1998

TAI

4 TAI
TAI 24
3 2

TAIq0608

71

0102

5 TAI

13 q0712
q0718 17
q0714
q0702

Webb
1998
2004

q1505
q1516

72

17 2006

6 TAI

TAI
Slavin, Madden, & Leavey, 1983; Slavin et al., 1983; Slavin, 1983; Slavin & Karweit,
1984a; Slavin, Leavey, & Madden, 1984; Nichols & Mill, 1993 TAI
24 TAI

TAI
TAI
15
5 10
TAI
7
TAI
q1221
4
q1220

805
4
q1214
5

q1201
TAI

TAI

7 TAI

73

TAI

17 6 7

q0803
TAI
q0825
4

,
q0801
Slavin 19821983 TAI MAH
Slavin1983

TAI MAH

17 15
TAI

1 TAI

TAI

TAI
TAI

13
q0208

TAI
q0227

q0230

74

17 2006

q0221 7 TAI

q0202

TAI

q0224 2
q0205
0216
TAI

Slavin, 1985, 1995

TAI
5

TAI
TAI

TAI
21/30 TAI

TAI

TAI

29 TAI
TAI

75

TAI

13/30

TAI
17/30 TAI
TAI

TAI
17 15 TAI

TAI
TAI

TAI
13
9
TAI

TAI
1. TAI
TAI

2.TAI

76

17 2006

3.

4.

1. TAI

2. TAI TAI
3. TAI

2000

2003

1999
33 91
1994

1519-38
1998
1239-72
2004 11
1992

19901215-20

77

1998

1994

2003

2004

2004

23111-136
2002

1996

1998

1990

1996
19-43

Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied

Developmental Psychology, 5, 331-343.
Dezin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. p151.
Hawkins, J. D., Doueck, H. J., & Lishner, D. M. ( 1988). Changing teacher practices in
mainstream classrooms to improve bonding and behavior of achievers. American
Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 31-50.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R. T., Johnson, J. & Anderson, D. (1976). The effects of
cooperative vs. individualized instruction on student prosocial behavior, attitudes
toward learning, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 446-452.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative,
competitive, and individualistic learning(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Natural Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
78

17 2006

Madden, N. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild academic
handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53,
519-569.
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Designing Qualitative Research: An Overview.
Mevarech, Z. R. (1991). Learning mathematics in different mastery environments. Journal of
Educational Research, 84(4), 225-231.
Nichols, J. D., & Miller, Raymond B. (1993). Cooperative Learning and Student Motivation.
Ed359254.
Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learningfrom text.
Educational Psychologist, 25, 19-33.
Ryan, F., & Wheeler, R. (1977). The effects of cooperative and Competitive background
experience of students on the play of a stimulation game. Journal of Educational
Research, 70, 295-299.
Salend, S. J., & Washin, B. (1988). Team-Assisted Individualization with Handicapped
Adjudicated Youth. Exceptional Children, 55(2), n2, p174-180, EJ378875.
Slavin, R. E. (1983). Effects of Cooperative Learning on Mainstreamed Academically
Handicapped Children. Final Report. Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. Center for
Social Organization of Schools. ED249719.
Slavin, R. E. (1985). Team-assisted individualization combining cooperative learning and
individualized instruction in mathematics, In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. H.
Lazarowitz, C. Webb and R. Schmuck(eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to
learn(pp.177-209). New York: Plenum Press.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice. Massachusetts:
Simon & Schuster company.
Slavin, Robert E., et al. (1983). Team-Assisted Individualization: A Cooperative Learning
Solution for Adaptive Instruction in Mathematics. ED232852.
Slavin, R. E., & Karweit, N. L. (1984a). Mathematics Achievement Effects of Three Levels of
Individualization: Whole Class, Ability Grouped, and Individualized Instruction. Johns
Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. Center for Social Organization of Schools. ED242559.
Slavin, R. E., & Karweit, N. L. (1984b). Mastery learning and student teams: A factorial
experiment in urban general mathematics class. American Educational Research

79

Journal, 21, 725-736.

Slavin, R. E., Leavey, M., & Madden, N. A. (1984). Combining Cooperative Learning and
Individualized Instruction: Effects on Student Mathematics Achievement, Attitudes, and
Behaviors. Elementary School Journal 84 (4) p409-422, EJ297102.
Slavin, R. E. Madden, N. A.& Leavey, M. (1983). Combining Student Teams and
Individualized Instruction in Mathematics: An Extended Evaluation. ED231619
Slavin, Robert E., et al. (1982). Effects of cooperative learning and individualized instruction
on the social acceptance, achievement, and behavior of mainstreamed students.
Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools The Johns Hopkins
University. Ed 1.310/2: 223046
William, Y. L. (1998). Teaching Self-Monitoring Skilling in Statistics. Self-Regulated
Learning From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practic(pp. 88-105).

2006 03 23
2006 05 22
2006 06 13

80

17 2006

An Action Research for

Team-Accelerated Instruction in
Mathematics
Ching-Hui Ke
Teacher,
Kung Ming Elementary School
Taichung County

Abstract
Team-accelerated instruction (TAI) is an instructional method that combines
individualized instruction with cooperative learning in mathematics, in which students work
on individualized units in heterogeneous, cooperative learning groups. The purpose of this
action study was to investigate the effects of a TAI mathematic program on a sixth grade
classroom. Eighteen boys and thirteen girls participate in TAI class, each receiving two
units of mathematical courses. The results show that compared with traditional whole-class
instruction, TAI stimulates more interest and willingness to seek help and learn better, and it
also helps to improve the friendship between members. Implications of the TAI approach
for adaptive learning in Mathematics were discussed.
Key words: Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI), Cooperative Learning, Learning in
Mathematics.

81