CHAPTER
NO.
1.1
1.2
1.3
II
III
IV
PAGE
1.4
2.1
2.2
3.1
3.2
NO.
CHAPTER-I
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION:
Among the various business decisions capital budgeting decisions are
critical and crucial decisions. Therefore special care must be taken while taking these
decisions.
2
The scope of the study is limited to collecting the financial data of ULTRATECH
CEMENTS for four years and budgeted figures of each year.
Capital Budgeting means planning for capital assets. Capital Budgeting decisions are
vital to an organization as to include the decision as to:
Weather or not funds should be invested in long term projects such as settings
of an industry, purchase of plant and machinery etc.,
(2)
METHODOLOGY:
At each point of time a business firm has a number of proposals regarding various
projects in which, it can invest funds. But the funds available with the firm are always
limited and are not possible to invest trend in the entire proposal at a time. Hence it is
very essential to select from amongst the various competing proposals, those that gives
the highest benefits. The crux of capital budgeting is the allocation of available resources
to various proposals. There are many considerations, economic as well as non-economic,
7
which influence the capital budgeting decision in the profitability of the prospective
investment.
Yet the right involved in the proposals cannot be ignored, profitability and risk are
directly related, i.e. higher profitability the greater the risk and vice versa there are
several methods for evaluating and ranking the capital investment proposals.
LIMITATIONS:
(1) All the techniques of capital budgeting presume that various investment proposals
under consideration that are mutually exclusive which may not practically be true
in some particular circumstances.
(2) The techniques of capital budgeting requires estimation of future cash inflows
and out flows. The future is always uncertain and the data collected for future may
not be exact. Obviously, the result based upon wrong data can not be good.
(3) There are certain factors like morale of employees, goodwill of the firm, etc.,
which cannot be correctly qualified but which otherwise substantially influence
the capital decision.
(4) Urgency is another limitation in evaluation of capital investment decision.
(5) Uncertainty and risk pose the biggest limitation to the techniques of capital
budgeting.
CHAPTER - II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Data collection:
Primary data: - The primary data is the data which is collected, by interviewing
directly with the organizations concerned executives. This is the direct information
gathered from the organization.
CAPITAL BUDGETING:
A capital expenditure is an outlay of cash for a project that is expected
to produce a cash inflow over a period of time exceeding one year. Examples of projects
include investments in property, plant, and equipment, research and development
projects, large advertising campaigns, or any other project that requires a capital
expenditure and generates a future cash flow.
Because capital expenditures can be very large and have a significant impact on the
financial performance of the firm, great importance is placed on project selection. This
process is called capital budgeting.
KINDS OF CB DECISIONS:
Capital Budgeting refers to the total process of generating, evaluating, selecting and
following up on capital expenditure alternatives basically; the firm may be confronted
with three types of capital budgeting decisions
Accept reject decisions
10
The future benefits will occur to the firm over a series of year.
Importance of Investment Decisions:Investment decisions require special attention because of the following reasons.
Growth
13
Risk
A long-term commitment of funds may also change the risk complexity of the
firm. If the adoption of an investment increases average gain but causes frequent
fluctuations in its earnings, the firm will become more risky. Thus, investment decisions
shape the basic character of a firm.
Funding
Investment decisions generally involve large amount of funds, which make it
imperative for the firm to plan its investment programmers very carefully and make an
advance arrangements for procuring finances internally or externally.
Irreversibility
Most investment decisions are irreversible. It is difficult to find a market for
such capital items once they have been acquired. The firm will incur heavy losses if such
assets are scrapped.
Complexity
Investment decisions are among the firms most difficult decisions. They
are an assessment of future events, which are difficult to predict. It is really a complex
problem to Economic, political, social and technological forces cause the uncertainty in
cash flow estimation.
14
15
Independent investments
Contingent investments
Independent Investments
Independent investments serve different purposes and do not
compete with each other. For example, a heavy engineering company may be
considering expansion of its plant capacity to manufacture additional excavators and
addition of new production facilities to manufacture a new product - light
commercial vehicles. Depending on their profitability and availability of funds, the
company can undertake both investments.
Contingent Investments
16
given. Thus, our discussion in this chapter is confined to the third step.
Specifically, we focus on the merits and demerits of various decision rules.
17
It should consider all cash flows to determine the true profitability of the
project.
It should recognize the fact that bigger cash flows are preferable to
smaller ones and early cash flows are preferable to later ones.
Evaluation criteria
A number of investment criteria (or capital budgeting techniques) are in
use in practice. They may be grouped in the following two categories.
1. Discounted cash flow criteria
Profitability index(PI)
Payback period(PB)
the company they would choose all projects with positive net present values, even if that
value is just $1. On the other hand, if they have limited resources, they will rank the
projects and pick those with the highest NPV's.
The discount rate used most frequently is the company's cost of capital.
Net present value (NPV) or net present worth (NPW)[ is defined as the total present value
(PV) of a time series of cash flows. It is a standard method for using the time value of
money to appraise long-term projects. Used for capital budgeting, and widely throughout
economics, it measures the excess or shortfall of cash flows, in present value terms, once
financing charges are met.
The rate used to discount future cash flows to their present values is a key
variable of this process. A firm's weighted average cost of capital (after tax) is often used,
but many people believe that it is appropriate to use higher discount rates to adjust for
risk for riskier projects or other factors. A variable discount rate with higher rates applied
to cash flows occurring further along the time span might be used to reflect the yield
curve premium for long-term debt.
19
Profitability index
Yet another time adjusted method of evaluating the investment proposals is the
benefit-cost (B/C) ratio or profitability index. Profitability index is the ratio of the present
20
value of cash inflows at the required rate of return, to the initial cash out flow of the
investment.
Evaluation of PI method
Like the NPV and IRR rules, PI is a conceptually sound method of arising
investment projects. It is a variation of the NPV method and requires the same
computations as the NPV method.
Like NPV method PI criterion also requires calculation of cash flows and
estimate of the discount rate.
Payback period
The payback period is one of the most popular and widely recognized
traditional methods of evaluating investment proposals. Payback is the number of
years required to cover the original cash outlay invested in a project. If the project
21
generates constant annual cash inflows, the payback period can be computed by
dividing cash outlay by the annual cash inflow.
Evolution of payback:
Many firms use the payback period as an investment evaluation
criterion and a method of ranking projects. They compare the projects payback
with pre-determined standard pay back. The would be accepted if its payback
period is less than the maximum or standard pay back period set by
management as a ranking method. It gives highest ranking to the project, which
has the shortest payback period and lowest ranking to the project with highest
payback period. Thus if the firm has to choose between two mutually exclusive
projects, the project with shorter pay back period will be selected.
Simplicity
The significant merit of payback is that it is simple to understand
and easy to calculate. The business executives consider the simplicity of
method as a virtue. This is evident from their heavy reliance on it for
appraising investment proposals in practice.
Cost effective
Payback method costs less than most of the sophisticated techniques that
22
Short-term
Effects a company can have more favorable short-run effects on
earnings per share by setting up a shorter standard payback period. It
should, however, be remembered that this may not be a wise long-term
policy as the company may have to sacrifice its future growth for current
earnings.
Liquidity
The emphasis in payback is on the early recovery of the
investment. Thus, it gives an insight into the liquidity of the project. The
funds so released can be put to other uses.
In spite of its simplicity and the so, called virtues,
the payback may not be a desirable investment criterion since it suffers
from a number of serious limitations.
. Risk shield
The risk of the project can be tackled by having a shorter standard
payback period. As it may be in a ensured guaranty against its loss. A
company has to invest in many projects where the cash inflows and life
expectancies are highly uncertain. Under such circumstances, pay back
may become important, not so much as a measure of profitability but, as a
means of establishing an upper bound on the acceptable degree of risk.
The discounted pay back period is the no. of. Periods taken in recovering the
investment outlay on the present value basis. The discounted payback period still fails to
consider the cash flows occurring after the payback period.
24
Simplicity
ACCOUNTING DATA
The ARR can be readily calculated from the accounting
data, unlike in the NPV and IRR methods, no adjustments are required to arrive at
cash flows of the project.
ACCOUNTING PROFITABILITY
The ARR rule incorporates the entire stream of income in
the projects. Accounting profits are based on arbitrary assumptions and choices
and also include non-cash items. It is, there fore in appropriate to relay on them
for measuring the acceptability of the investment projects.
ARBITRARY CUT-OFF
25
The firm employing the ARR rule uses an arbitrary cut-off yardstick.
Generally, the yardstick is the firms current return on its assets (book -value).
Because of this, the growth companies earning very high rates on their existing
assets may project profitable projects and the less profitable companies may
accepts bad projects.
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION
Project classification entails time and effort the costs incurred in this exercise
must be justified by the benefits from it. Certain projects, given their complexity and
magnitude, may warrant a detailed analysis; others may call for a relatively simple
analysis. Hence firms normally classify projects into different categories. Each category
is then analyzed somewhat differently.
While the system of classification may vary from one firm to another, the following
categories are found in cost classification.
Mandatory investments
These are expenditures required to comply with statutory requirements.
Examples of such investments are pollution control equipment, medical dispensary, fire
fitting equipment, crche in factory premises and so on. These are often non-revenue
producing investments. In analyzing such investments the focus is mainly on finding the
most cost-effective way of fulfilling a given statutory need.
Replacement projects
Firms routinely invest in equipments means meant to obsolete and inefficient
equipment, even though they may be a serviceable condition. The objective of such
investments is to reduce costs (of labor, raw material and power), increase yield and
improve quality. Replacement projects can be evaluated in a fairly straightforward
manner, through at times the analysis may be quite detailed.
Expansion projects
26
These investments are meant to increase capacity and/or widen the distribution
network. Such investments call for an expansion projects normally warrant more careful
analysis than replacement projects. Decisions relating to such projects are taken by the
top management.
Diversification projects
These investments are aimed at producing new products or services or entering
into entirely new geographical areas. Often diversification projects entail substantial
risks, involve large outlays, and require considerable managerial effort and attention.
Given their strategic importance, such projects call for a very through evaluation, both
quantitative and qualitative. Further they require a significant involvement of the board of
directors.
Miscellaneous projects
This is a catch-all category that includes items like interior decoration,
recreational facilities, executive aircrafts, landscaped gardens, and so on. There is no
standard approach for evaluating these projects and decisions regarding them are based
on personal preferences of top managemen
Introduction
Until now, this web site has broken one of the cardinal rules of financial management.
This page corrects for that problem and presents now, the first part of the subject of
Capital Budgeting.
Many books and chapters and web pages purport to discuss capital budgeting when in
reality all they do is discuss CAPITAL INVESTMENT APPRAISAL. There's nothing
wrong with a discussion of the CIA methods except that authors have a duty to point out
that CIA methods are only one part of a multi stage process: the capital budgeting
process.
A discussion of CIA and nothing else means that capital budgeting decisions are being
discussed out of context. That is, by ignoring the earlier and later parts of capital
budgeting, we are never assess where capital budgeting project come from, how
alternatives are found and evaluated, how we really choose which project to choose
and then we never review the projects and how they have been implemented.
28
Definition
Capital budgeting relates to the investment in assets or an organization that is relatively
large. That is, a new asset or project will amount in value to a significant proportion of
the total assets of the organization.
The International Federation of Accountants, IFAC, defines capital expenditures as
Investments to acquire fixed or long lived assets from which a stream of benefits is
expected. Such expenditures represent an organization's commitment to produce and sell
future products and engage in other activities. Capital expenditure decisions, therefore,
form a foundation for the future profitability of a company.
Projects don't just fall out of thin air: someone has to have them. The main point here is
that successful, dynamic and growing companies are constantly on the lookout for new
projects to consider. In the largest organizations there are entire departments looking for
alternatives and opportunities.
2 Look for suitable projects
Once someone has had the idea to invest, the next step is to look at suitable projects:
projects that complement current business, projects that are completely different to
current business and so on. Initially, all possibilities will be considered: along the lines of
a brainstorming exercise.
As time goes by, and as corporate objectives allow, the initial list of potential projects will
be whittled down to a more manageable number.
3 Identify and consider alternatives
Having found a few projects to consider, the organization will investigate any number of
different ways of carrying them out. After all, the first idea probably won't either be the
last or the best. Creativity is the order of the day here, as organizations attempt to start off
on the best footing.
29
As the diagram suggests, at each of these first three stages, we need to consider whether
what we are proposing fits in with corporate objectives. There is no point in thinking of a
project that conflicts with, say, the growth objective or the profitability objective or even
an environmental objective.
A lot of data will be generated in this stage and this data will be fed into stage four:
Capital Investment Appraisal.
4 Capital Investment Appraisal
This is the number crunching stage in which we use some or all of the following methods
Payback (PB)
accounting rate of return (ARR)
Net present value (NPV)
Internal rate of return (IRR)
Profitability Index (PI)
There are other techniques of course; but the technique to be used will depend on a range
of things, including the knowledge and sophistication of the management of the
organization, the availability of computers and the size and complexity of the project
under review.
For more information here, go to my page on CIA once you have finished this page.
5 Analysis of feasibility
Stage four is the number crunching stage. This stage is where the decision is made as to
which project is to be assessed as acceptable. That is, which project is feasible?
In order to choose the project, management needs some hurdles:
What must the payback be
What rate of ARR is acceptable
30
from start to finish: stages 1 - 7 and looks at how it was thought of, analyzed, chosen,
implemented, and monitored and so on.
The purpose of the post audit is to test whether capital budgeting procedures have been
fully and fairly applied to the project under review.
Of course, any weaknesses that might be found during the post audit might be specific to
one project or they might relate to capital budgeting systems for the organization as a
whole. In the latter case, the auditor will report back to his superiors and to management
that systems need to be overhauled as a result of what has been found.
33
CHAPTER III
INDUSTRY/ COMPANY PROFILE
INDUSTRY PROFILE
34
Modern cement
35
Modern hydraulic cements began to be developed from the start of the Industrial
Revolution (around 1800), driven by three main needs:
Hydraulic renders for finishing brick buildings in wet climates
Hydraulic mortars for masonry construction of harbor works etc, in contact with sea
water.
Development of strong concretes.
In Britain particularly, good quality building stone became ever more expensive during a
period of rapid growth, and it became a common practice to construct prestige buildings
from the new industrial bricks, and to finish them with a stucco to imitate stone.
Hydraulic limes were favored for this, but the need for a fast set time encouraged the
development of new cements. Most famous was Parker's "Roman cement." This was
developed by James Parker in the 1780s, and finally patented in 1796. It was, in fact,
nothing like any material used by the Romans, but was a "Natural cement" made by
burning septaria - nodules that are found in certain clay deposits, and that contain both
clay minerals and calcium carbonate. The burnt nodules were ground to a fine powder.
This product, made into a mortar with sand, set in 515 minutes. The success of "Roman
Cement" led other manufacturers to develop rival products by burning artificial mixtures
of clay and chalk.
John Smeaton made an important contribution to the development of cements when he
was planning the construction of the third Eddystone Lighthouse (1755-9) in the English
Channel. He needed a hydraulic mortar that would set and develop some strength in the
twelve hour period between successive high tides. He performed an exhaustive market
research on the available hydraulic limes, visiting their production sites, and noted that
the "hydraulicity" of the lime was directly related to the clay content of the limestone
from which it was made. Smeaton was a civil engineer by profession, and took the idea
no further. Apparently unaware of Smeaton's work, the same principle was identified by
Louis Vicat in the first decade of the nineteenth century. Vicat went on to devise a method
of combining chalk and clay into an intimate mixture, and, burning this, produced an
"artificial cement" in 1817. James Frost,orking in Britain, produced what he called
"British cement" in a similar manner around the same time, but did not obtain a patent
until 1822. In 1824, Joseph Aspdin patented a similar material, which he called Portland
36
cement, because the render made from it was in color similar to the prestigious Portland
stone.
All the above products could not compete with lime/pozzolan concretes because of fastsetting (giving insufficient time for placement) and low early strengths (requiring a delay
of many weeks before formwork could be removed). Hydraulic limes, "natural" cements
and "artificial" cements all rely upon their belite content for strength development. Belite
develops strength slowly. Because they were burned at temperatures below 1250 C, they
contained no alite, which is responsible for early strength in modern cements. The first
cement to consistently contain alite was made by Joseph Aspdin's son William in the
early 1840s. This was what we call today "modern" Portland cement. Because of the air
of mystery with which William Aspdin surrounded his product, others (e.g. Vicat and I C
Johnson) have claimed precedence in this invention, but recent analysis of both his
concrete and raw cement have shown that William Aspdin's product made at Northfleet,
Kent was a true alite-based cement. However, Aspdin's methods were "rule-of-thumb":
Vicat is responsible for establishing the chemical basis of these cements, and Johnson
established the importance of sintering the mix in the kiln.
William Aspdin's innovation was counter-intuitive for manufacturers of "artificial
cements", because they required more lime in the mix (a problem for his father), because
they required a much higher kiln temperature (and therefore more fuel) and because the
resulting clinker was very hard and rapidly wore down the millstones which were the
only available grinding technology of the time. Manufacturing costs were therefore
considerably higher, but the product set reasonably slowly and developed strength
quickly, thus opening up a market for use in concrete. The use of concrete in construction
grew rapidly from 1850 onwards, and was soon the dominant use for cements. Thus
Portland cement began its predominant role. it is made from water and sand
Portland cement
Cement is made by heating limestone (calcium carbonate), with small quantities of other
materials (such as clay) to 1450C in a kiln, in a process known as calcination, whereby a
molecule of carbon dioxide is liberated from the calcium carbonate to form calcium
oxide, or lime, which is then blended with the other materials that have been included in
the mix . The resulting hard substance, called 'clinker', is then ground with a small
amount of gypsum into a powder to make 'Ordinary Portland Cement', the most
commonly used type of cement (often referred to as OPC).
Portland cement is a basic ingredient of concrete, mortar and most non-speciality grout.
The most common use for Portland cement is in the production of concrete. Concrete is a
composite material consisting of aggregate (gravel and sand), cement, and water. As a
construction material, concrete can be cast in almost any shape desired, and once
hardened, can become a structural (load bearing) element. Portland cement may be gray
or white.
Portland cement blends
These are often available as inter-ground mixtures from cement manufacturers, but
similar formulations are often also mixed from the ground components at the concrete
mixing plant.
Portland blastfurnace cement contains up to 70% ground granulated blast furnace slag,
with the rest Portland clinker and a little gypsum. All compositions produce high ultimate
strength, but as slag content is increased, early strength is reduced, while sulfate
resistance increases and heat evolution diminishes. Used as an economic alternative to
Portland sulfate-resisting and low-heat cements.
Portland flyash cement contains up to 30% fly ash. The fly ash is pozzolanic, so that
ultimate strength is maintained. Because fly ash addition allows a lower concrete water
content, early strength can also be maintained. Where good quality cheap fly ash is
available, this can be an economic alternative to ordinary Portland cement.
Portland pozzolan cement includes fly ash cement, since fly ash is a pozzolan, but also
includes cements made from other natural or artificial pozzolans. In countries where
volcanic ashes are available (e.g. Italy, Chile, Mexico, the Philippines) these cements are
often the most common form in use.
38
Portland silica fume cement. Addition of silica fume can yield exceptionally high
strengths, and cements containing 5-20% silica fume are occasionally produced.
However, silica fume is more usually added to Portland cement at the concrete mixer.
Masonry cements are used for preparing bricklaying mortars and stuccos, and must not
be used in concrete. They are usually complex proprietary formulations containing
Portland clinker and a number of other ingredients that may include limestone, hydrated
lime, air entrainers, retarders, waterproofers and coloring agents. They are formulated to
yield workable mortars that allow rapid and consistent masonry work. Subtle variations
of Masonry cement in the US are Plastic Cements and Stucco Cements. These are
designed to produce controlled bond with masonry blocks.
Expansive cements contain, in addition to Portland clinker, expansive clinkers (usually
sulfoaluminate clinkers), and are designed to offset the effects of drying shrinkage that is
normally encountered with hydraulic cements. This allows large floor slabs (up to 60 m
square) to be prepared without contraction joints.
White blended cements may be made using white clinker and white supplementary
materials such as high-purity metakaolin.
Colored cements are used for decorative purposes. In some standards, the addition of
pigments to produce "colored Portland cement" is allowed. In other standards (e.g.
ASTM), pigments are not allowed constituents of Portland cement, and colored cements
are sold as "blended hydraulic cements".
Very finely ground cements are made from mixtures of cement with sand or with slag or
other pozzolan type minerals which are extremely finely ground together. Such cements
can have the same physical characteristics as normal cement but with 50% less cement
particularly due to their increased surface area for the chemical reaction. Even with
intensive grinding they can use up to 50% less energy to fabricate than ordinary Portland
cements.
Non-Portland hydraulic cements
Pozzolan-lime cements. Mixtures of ground pozzolan and lime are the cements used by
the Romans, and are to be found in Roman structures still standing (e.g. the Pantheon in
Rome). They develop strength slowly, but their ultimate strength can be very high. The
39
hydration products that produce strength are essentially the same as those produced by
Portland cement.
Slag-lime cements. Ground granulated blast furnace slag is not hydraulic on its own, but
is "activated" by addition of alkalis, most economically using lime. They are similar to
pozzolan lime cements in their properties. Only granulated slag (i.e. water-quenched,
glassy slag) is effective as a cement component.
Supersulfated cements. These contain about 80% ground granulated blast furnace slag,
15% gypsum or anhydrite and a little Portland clinker or lime as an activator. They
produce strength by formation of ettringite, with strength growth similar to a slow
Portland cement. They exhibit good resistance to aggressive agents, including sulfate.
Calcium aluminate cements are hydraulic cements made primarily from limestone and
bauxite. The active ingredients are monocalcium aluminate CaAl 2O4 (CaO Al2O3 or CA
in Cement chemist notation, CCN) and mayenite Ca12Al14O33 (12 CaO 7 Al2O3 , or C12A7
in CCN). Strength forms by hydration to calcium aluminate hydrates. They are welladapted for use in refractory (high-temperature resistant) concretes, e.g. for furnace
linings.
Calcium sulfoaluminate cements are made from clinkers that include ye'elimite
(Ca4(AlO2)6SO4 or C4A3
strength, high-late strength mineral in Portland cement) are formed without the formation
of excessive amounts of free lime. As with any natural material, such cements have
highly variable properties.
Geopolymer cements are made from mixtures of water-soluble alkali metal silicates and
aluminosilicate mineral powders such as fly ash and metakaolin.
COMPANY PROFILE
41
ULTRATECH CEMENT:
UltraTech Cement Limited has an annual capacity of 18.2 million tonnes. It manufactures
and markets Ordinary Portland Cement, Portland Blast Furnace Slag Cement and
Portland Pozzalana Cement. It also manufactures ready mix concrete (RMC).
UltraTech Cement Limited has five integrated plants, six grinding units and three
terminals two in India and one in Sri Lanka.
UltraTech Cement is the countrys largest exporter of cement clinker. The export markets
span countries around the Indian Ocean, Africa, Europe and the Middle East.
UltraTechs subsidiaries are Dakshin Cement Limited and UltraTech Ceylinco (P)
Limited.
The roots of the Aditya Birla Group date back to the 19th century in the picturesque town
of Pilani, set amidst the Rajasthan desert. It was here that Seth Shiv Narayan Birla started
trading in cotton, laying the foundation for the House of Birlas.
Through India's arduous times of the 1850s, the Birla business expanded rapidly. In the
early part of the 20th century, our Group's founding father, Ghanshyamdas Birla, set up
industries in critical sectors such as textiles and fibre, aluminium, cement and chemicals.
As a close confidante of Mahatma Gandhi, he played an active role in the Indian freedom
struggle. He represented India at the first and second round-table conference in London,
along with Gandhiji. It was at "Birla House" in Delhi that the luminaries of the Indian
freedom struggle often met to plot the downfall of the British Raj.
Ghanshyamdas Birla found no contradiction in pursuing business goals with the
dedication of a saint, emerging as one of the foremost industrialists of pre-independence
India. The principles by which he lived were soaked up by his grandson, Aditya Vikram
Birla, our Group's legendary leader.
Aditya Vikram Birla: putting India on the world map
A formidable force in Indian industry, Mr. Aditya Birla dared to
42
dream of setting up a global business empire at the age of 24. He was the first to put
Indian business on the world map, as far back as 1969, long before globalisation became
a buzzword in India.
In the then vibrant and free market South East Asian countries, he ventured to set up
world-class production bases. He had foreseen the winds of change and staked the future
of his business on a competitive, free market driven economy order. He put Indian
business on the globe, 22 years before economic liberalisation was formally introduced
by the former Prime Minister, Mr. Narasimha Rao and the former Union Finance
Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh. He set up 19 companies outside India, in Thailand,
Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Egypt.
Interestingly, for Mr. Aditya Birla, globalisation meant more than just geographic reach.
He believed that a business could be global even whilst being based in India. Therefore,
back in his home-territory, he drove single-mindedly to put together the building blocks
to make our Indian business a global force. Under his stewardship, his companies rose to
be the world's largest producer of viscose staple fibre, the largest refiner of palm oil, the
third largest producer of insulators and the sixth largest producer of carbon black. In
India, they attained the status of the largest single producer of viscose filament yarn, apart
from being a producer of cement, grey cement and rayon grade pulp. The Group is also
the largest producer of aluminium in the private sector, the lowest first cost producers in
the world and the only producer of linen in the textile industry in India.
At the time of his untimely demise, the Group's revenues crossed Rs.8,000 crore globally,
with assets of over Rs.9,000 crore, comprising of 55 benchmark quality plants, an
employee strength of 75,000 and a shareholder community of 600,000.
Most importantly, his companies earned respect and admiration of the people, as one of
India's finest business houses, and the first Indian International Group globally. Through
this outstanding record of enterprise, he helped create enormous wealth for the nation,
and respect for Indian entrepreneurship in South East Asia. In his time, his success was
unmatched by any other industrialist in India.
43
That India attains respectable rank among the developed nations, was a dream he forever
cherished. He was proud of India and took equal pride in being an Indian.
Under the leadership of our Chairman, Mr. Kumar Mangalam Birla, the Group has
sustained and established a leadership position in its key businesses through continuous
value-creation. Spearheaded by Grasim, Hindalco, Aditya Birla Nuvo, Indo Gulf
Fertilisers and companies in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Egypt,
the Aditya Birla Group is a leader in a swathe of products viscose staple fibre,
aluminium, cement, copper, carbon black, palm oil, insulators, garments. And with
successful forays into financial services, telecom, software and BPO, the Group is today
one of Asia's most diversified business groups.
Board of Directors
:: Mr. Kumar Mangalam Birla, Chairman
:: Mrs. Rajashree Birla
:: Mr. R. C. Bhargava
:: Mr. G. M. Dave
:: Mr. N. J. Jhaveri
:: Mr. S. B. Mathur
:: Mr. V. T. Moorthy
:: Mr. O. P. Puranmalka
:: Mr. S. Rajgopal
:: Mr. D. D. Rathi
:: Mr. S. Misra, Managing Director
Executive President & Chief Financial Officer
:: Mr. K. C. Birla
Chief Manufacturing Officer
:: R.K. Shah
Chief Marketing Officer
:: Mr. O. P. Puranmalka
Company Secretary
:: Mr. S. K. Chatterjee
Our vision
44
"To actively contribute to the social and economic development of the communities
in which we operate. In so doing, build a better, sustainable way of life for the
weaker sections of society and raise the country's human development index."
Mrs. Rajashree Birla, Chairperson,
The Aditya Birla Centre for Community Initiatives and Rural Development
Making a difference
Before Corporate Social Responsibility found a place in corporate lexion, it was already
textured into our Group's value systems. As early as the 1940s, our founding father Shri
G.D Birla espoused the trusteeship concept of management. Simply stated, this entails
that the wealth that one generates and holds is to be held as in a trust for our multiple
stakeholders. With regard to CSR, this means investing part of our profits beyond
business, for the larger good of society.
While carrying forward this philosophy, his grandson, Aditya Birla weaved in the concept
of 'sustainable livelihood', which transcended cheque book philanthropy. In his view, it
was unwise to keep on giving endlessly. Instead, he felt that channelising resources to
ensure that people have the wherewithal to make both ends meet would be more
productive. He would say, "Give a hungry man fish for a day, he will eat it and the next
day, he would be hungry again. Instead if you taught him how to fish, he would be able to
feed himself and his family for a lifetime."
Taking these practices forward, our chairman
Mr. Kumar Mangalam Birla institutionalised the concept of triple bottom line
accountability represented by economic success, environmental responsibility and social
commitment. In a holistic way thus, the interests of all the stakeholders have been
textured into our Group's fabric.
The footprint of our social work today straddles over 3,700 villages, reaching out to more
than 7 million people annually. Our community work is a way of telling the people
among whom we operate that We Care.
45
Our strategy
Our projects are carried out under the aegis of the "Aditya Birla Centre for Community
Initiatives and Rural Development", led by Mrs. Rajashree Birla. The Centre provides the
strategic direction, and the thrust areas for our work ensuring performance management
as well.
Our focus is on the all-round development of the communities around our plants located
mostly in distant rural areas and tribal belts. All our Group companies - Grasim,
Hindalco, Aditya Birla Nuvo, Indo Gulf and UltraTech have Rural Development Cells
which are the implementation bodies.
Projects are planned after a participatory need assessment of the communities around the
plants. Each project has a one-year and a three-year rolling plan, with milestones and
measurable targets. The objective is to phase out our presence over a period of time and
hand over the reins of further development to the people. This also enables us to widen
our reach. Along with internal performance assessment mechanisms, our projects are
audited by reputed external agencies, who measure it on qualitative and quantitative
parameters, helping us gauge the effectiveness and providing excellent inputs.
Our partners in development are government bodies, district authorities, village
panchayats and the end beneficiaries -- the villagers. The Government has, in their 5-year
plans, special funds earmarked for human development and we recourse to many of
these. At the same time, we network and collaborate with like-minded bilateral and
unilateral agencies to share ideas, draw from each other's experiences, and ensure that
efforts are not duplicated. At another level, this provides a platform for advocacy. Some
of the agencies we have collaborated with are UNFPA, SIFSA, CARE India, Habitat for
Humanity International, Unicef and the World Bank.
Our focus areas
Our rural development activities span five key areas and our single-minded goal here is to
help build model villages that can stand on their own feet. Our focus areas are healthcare,
education, sustainable livelihood, infrastructure and espousing social causes.
46
The name Aditya Birla evokes all that is positive in business and in life. It exemplifies
integrity, quality, performance, perfection and above all character.
Our logo is the symbolic reflection of these traits. It is the cornerstone of our corporate
identity. It helps us leverage the unique Aditya Birla brand and endows us with a
distinctive visual image.
Depicted in vibrant, earthy colours, it is very arresting and shows the sun rising over two
circles. An inner circle symbolising the internal universe of the Aditya Birla Group, an
outer circle symbolising the external universe, and a dynamic meeting of rays converging
and diverging between the two.
Through its wide usage, we create a consistent, impact-oriented Group image. This
undoubtedly enhances our profile among our internal and external stakeholders.
Our corporate logo thus serves as an umbrella for our Group. It signals the common
values and beliefs that guide our behaviour in all our entrepreneurial activities. It embeds
a sense of pride, unity and belonging in all of our 130,000 colleagues spanning 25
countries and 30 nationalities across the globe. Our logo is our best calling card that
opens the gateway to the world.
Group companies
:: Grasim Industries Ltd.
:: Hindalco Industries Ltd.
:: Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd.
:: UltraTech Cement Ltd.
47
Indian companies
:: Aditya Birla Minacs IT Services Ltd.
:: Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Limited
:: Essel Mining & Industries Ltd
:: Idea Cellular Ltd.
:: Aditya Birla Insulators
:: Aditya Birla Retail Limited
:: Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Limited
International companies
Thailand
:: Thai Rayon
:: Indo Thai Synthetics
:: Thai Acrylic Fibre
:: Thai Carbon Black
:: Aditya Birla Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd.
:: Thai Peroxide
Philippines
:: Indo Phil Group of companies
:: Pan Century Surfactants Inc.
Indonesia
:: PT Indo Bharat Rayon
:: PT Elegant Textile Industry
:: PT Sunrise Bumi Textiles
:: PT Indo Liberty Textiles
:: PT Indo Raya Kimia
Egypt
:: Alexandria Carbon Black Company S.A.E
:: Alexandria Fiber Company S.A.E
48
China
:: Liaoning Birla Carbon
:: Birla Jingwei Fibres Company Limited
:: Aditya Birla Grasun Chemicals (Fangchenggang) Ltd.
Canada
:: A.V. Group
Australia
:: Aditya Birla Minerals Ltd.
Laos
:: Birla Laos Pulp & Plantations Company Limited
North and South America, Europe and Asia
:: Novelis Inc.
Singapore
:: Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Pte Ltd. (SSOE)
Joint ventures
:: Birla Sun Life Insurance Company
:: Birla Sun Life Asset Management Company
:: Aditya Birla Money Mart Limited
:: Tanfac Industries Limited
UltraTech is India's largest exporter of cement clinker. The company's production
facilities are spread across eleven integrated plants, one white cement plant, one
clinkerisation plant in UAE, fifteen grinding units, and five terminals four in India and
one in Sri Lanka. Most of the plants have ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001
certification. In addition, two plants have received ISO 27001 certification and four have
received SA 8000 certification. The process is currently underway for the remaining
plants. The company exports over 2.5 million tonnes per annum, which is about 30 per
cent of the country's total exports. The export market comprises of countries around the
Indian Ocean, Africa, Europe and the Middle East. Export is a thrust area in the
company's strategy for growth.
49
UltraTech's products include Ordinary Portland cement, Portland Pozzolana cement and
Portland blast furnace slag cement.
combine chemically with portland cement in the presence of water to form extra strong
cementing material which resists wet cracking, thermal cracking and has a high degree of
cohesion and workability in concrete and mortar.
"As a Group we have always operated and continue to operate our businesses as
Trustees with a deep rooted obligation to synergise growth with responsibility."
Mr Kumar Mangalam Birla, Chairman, Aditya Birla Group
The cement industry relies heavily on natural resources to fuel its operations. As these
dwindle, the imperative is clear alternative sources of energy have to be sought out
and the use of existing resources has to be reduced, or eliminated altogether. Only then
can sustainable business be carried out, and a corporate can truly say it is contributing to
the preservation of the environment.
UltraTech takes its responsibility to conserve the environment very seriously, and its ecofriendly approach is evident across all spheres of its operations. Its major thrust has been
to identify alternatives to achieve set objectives and thereby reduce its carbon footprint.
These are done through:
::
::
::
::
::
::
Waste management
Energy management
Water conservation
Biodiversity management
Afforestation
Reduction in emissions
Importantly, UltraTech has set a target of 2.96 per cent reduction in CO 2 emission
intensity, at a rate of 0.5 per cent annually, up to 2015-16, with 2010-10 as the baseline
year. This will also include CO2 emissions from the recently acquired ETA Star Cement
and upcoming projects.
51
Our strategy
Our projects are carried out under the aegis of the "Aditya Birla Centre for Community
Initiatives and Rural Development", led by Mrs. Rajashree Birla. The Centre provides the
strategic direction, and the thrust areas for our work ensuring performance management
as well.
Our focus is on the all-round development of the communities around our plants located
mostly in distant rural areas and tribal belts. All our Group companies - Grasim,
Hindalco, Aditya Birla Nuvo and UltraTech have Rural Development Cells which are the
implementation bodies.
Projects are planned after a participatory need assessment of the communities around the
plants. Each project has a one-year and a three-year rolling plan, with milestones and
measurable targets. The objective is to phase out our presence over a period of time and
hand over the reins of further development to the people. This also enables us to widen
our reach. Along with internal performance assessment mechanisms, our projects are
audited by reputed external agencies, who measure it on qualitative and quantitative
parameters, helping us gauge the effectiveness and providing excellent inputs.
Our partners in development are government bodies, district authorities, village
panchayats and the end beneficiaries the villagers. The Government has, in their 5year plans, special funds earmarked for human development and we recourse to many of
these. At the same time, we network and collaborate with like-minded bilateral and
unilateral agencies to share ideas, draw from each other's experiences, and ensure that
efforts are not duplicated. At another level, this provides a platform for advocacy. Some
of the agencies we have collaborated with are UNFPA, SIFSA, CARE India, Habitat for
Humanity International, Unicef and the World Bank.
Our vision
"To actively contribute to the social and economic development of the communities
in which we operate. In so doing, build a better, sustainable way of life for the
weaker sections of society and raise the country's human development index."
52
53
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS
&
INTERPRETATION
54
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sales turnover
(revenue)
Other income
3413.73
3629.10
3790.55
4499.67
5500.39
319.29
330.38
316.37
384.48
470.99
Total:
3733.02
3959.48
4106.92
4884.15
5971.38
49.94
110.56
82.25
13.11
14.25
Total:
3782.96
4070.04
4189.17
4897.26
5985.63
Less:
operating 16.56
stock
Other income:
3766.40
49.94
110.56
82.25
13.11
4078.61
4815.01
5972.52
Less:
operating 57.56
expenses
Cash flow before 3708.84
tax:
58.51
83.36
87.18
80.63
3961.59
3995.25
4727.83
5891.89
217.75
244.77
249.19
3777.5
4483.06
5642.70
Less: depreciation
4020.10
194.82
212.60
Taxable income:
3514.02
Less: tax
3.36
11.31
7.29
2.03
3.28
3510.66
3737.68
3770.21
4481.03
5639.42
212.60
217.75
244.77
249.19
3987.96
4725.8
5888.61
Add: depreciation
Cash flow after tax:
3748.99
194.82
3705.48
3950.28
NOTE: (Cash flows after tax has been taken as an initial investment or cash out flows for
the calculation of capital budgeting techniques)
55
YEAR
(Rs. In crorers)
CASH INFLOW CUMULATIVE
CASH FLOWWS
2009-2010
3705.48
3705.48
20010-2011
3950.28
7655.76
2011-2012
3987.96
11643.72
2012-2013
4725.80
16369.52
2013-2014
5888.61
22258.13
56
The above table shows that, the initial investment RS.4451.626 Lacks lies
between first and second years with Rs. 3705.48and 7655.76 lacks
The amount has been recovered in the first year and the remaining
amount in second year (1907.896-1311.533=596.363)
PBP =
1 + 0.1884
1.1884 year
57
(ii)
(iii)
Original investment
-----------------------2
Original investment +scrap value
-----------------------------------------2
Cash flows of the ULTRATECH CEMENTS are shown in cash flow statement. ARR
is calculated as follows:
YEARS
2009-2010
3510.66
20010-2011
3737.68
2011-2012
3770.21
2012-2013
4481.03
2013-2014
5639.42
TOTAL
21139.00
ARR
Total amount
Average Annual EATS = --------------------No of years
21139.00
= -----------------5
Average investment =4451.626
4227.8
ARR = ---------------- X 100
4451.626
= 95%
= 4227.8
Net present value method or NPV is one of the discounted cash flows methods.
The method is considered to be one of the best of evaluating the capital
investment proposals. Under this method cash inflows and outflows associated
with each project are first calculated.
ROLE OF DISCOUNTING FACTOR:
The cash inflows and out flows are converted to the present values using
discounting factor which is the actuary discount factor of Regulated display tool
kit project of ULTRATECH CEMENTS is 8%.
The rate of return is considered as cut off rate or required rate or rate
generally determined on the basis of cost of capital to allow for the risk element
involved in the project.
60
61
CFATS
(Rs. In lakhs)
PVIF @ 10%
PVS
2009-2010
3705.48
0.909
3368.28
20010-2011
3950.28
0.826
3262.93
2011-2012
3987.96
0.7513
2996.15
2012-2013
4725.80
0.683
3227.72
2013-2014
5888.61
0.620
3650.90
TOTAL:
16505.98
4451.62
12054.98
ACCEPT-REJECT CRITERION:
The accept -reject decision of NPV is very simple. If the NPV is positive then the
project should be accepted and if NPV is negative then the project should be
rejected
i.e .If
NPV > 0
(ACCEPT)
and
NPV < 0
(REJECT)
IRR is the rate the sum of discounted cash inflows equals the sum of
discounted cash outflows. It equals the present value of cash inflow to present value
of cash outflows.
In this method discount rate is not known, but the cash inflows and cash
out flows are known. It is the rate of return, which equates the present value of cash
inflows to out flows or it, is the rate of return, which renders NPV TO ZERO.
Higher NP
IRR= R +
---------------------------- XR1
Difference of P V s.
63
FORMULATION OF STEPS:
STATEMENT OF SHOWING CALCULATION NPV @88%,89%,90% UNDER
IRR METHOD
(R s corers)
YEARS
Annual
Discount
Discount
Discount
CFA Ts
Rate-88%
Rate-89%
Rate-90%
PVF
PV
PVF
PV
PVF
PV
2009-2010
3705.48
0.5405 2002.81
0.5291
1960.56
0.526
1949.08
20010-2011
3950.28
0.2921 1153.87
0.2799
1105.68
0.277
1094.22
2011-2012
3989.96
0.1579 630.01
0.1481
590.91
0.145
578.54
2012-2013
4725.80
0.0858 405.40
0.0783
370.03
0.076
359.16
2013-2014
5888.61
0.0461 271.46
0.0414
243.78
0.040
235.54
4463.55
4270.96
4216.54
DECISION:
Since the initial investment RS.4451.626 lacks is lies between 88% and 89% the
company ULTRATECH can determine the IRR as 88.5%
Hence IRR=88.5%
64
ACCEPT-REJECT CRITERION:
IRR is the maximum rate of interest, which an organization can afford to pay
on capital invested in, is accepted if IRR exceeds the cutoff rates and rejected if it
is below the cutoff rate.
The cutoff rate of ULTRATECH CEMENTS is 10%, which is less than the
IRR i.e 88.5% Hence the acceptance of ULTRATECH CEMENTS is quiet a
good investment decision taken by management.
Profitability index
65
CALCULATIONS OF BCR:
STEP1: Calculations of cash flows after taxes
STEP2: Calculations of Present values of cash inflows @10%.
STEP3: Application of the formula.
CFATS
3705.48
PVIF @ 10%
0.909
PVS
3368.28
20010-2011
3950.28
0.826
3262.93
2011-2012
3989.96
0.751
2996.15
2012-2013
4725.80
0.683
3227.72
2013-2014
5888.61
0.620
3650.90
TOTAL:
16505.98
Profitability index
16505.98
= -----------------4451.62
Hence PI = 3.707 years.
66
= 3.707
ACCEPT-REJECT CRITERION:
There is a slight difference between present value index method and
profitability index method. Under profitability index method the present value of cash
inflows and cash outflows are taken as accept-reject decision.
I.e. the accept reject criterion is:
If Profitability Index
Profitability Index
> 1 (ACCEPT).
< 1
(REJECT).
67
CHAPTER - V
FINDINGS
SUGGESTIONS
CONCLUSIONS
FINDINGS:
68
1. It is observed that the company is able to increase its profits from year
to year.
2. The Gross profits from 2009 to 2014 increased from year to year
3. It is observed that the companies net worth is increasing considerably.
4. By observing the sources & applications, it is clear that the company is actively
increasing or standardizing its operations.
6. Since the initial investment RS.4451.626 lacks is lies between 88% and 89% the
company ULTRATECH can determine the IRR as 88.5%
69
SUGGESTIONS
1. There are various developments taking in the industry to challenge so as
to the company should develop as a full fledged research and developed
department for bringing technological changes and improvements in its
design & process.
2. The management has physically verified the stock of finished goods and
work-in-progress at the end of the year.
3. Company needs to identify the potential business revenue generation
which results to profit on operations.
4. In respect of service activities, there is a reasonable system of recording
receipts, issues and consumption of materials and stores of allocation of
materials consumed to the relative job. Commensurate with its size and
nature of its business.
70
CONCLUSIONS
The budgeting exercise in ULTRATECH also covers the long term capital
budgets, including annual planning and provides long term plan for application of
internal resources and debt servicing translated in to the corporate plan.
The scope of capital budgeting also includes expenditure on plant betterment, and
renovation, balancing equipment, capital additions and commissioning expenses
on trial runs generating units.
To establish a close link between physical progress and monitory outlay and to
provide the basis for plan allocation and budgetary support by the government.
The manual recommends the computation of NPV at a cost of capital / discount
rate specified from time to time.
A single discount rate should not be used for all the capacity budgeting projects.
The analysis of relevant facts and quantifications of anticipated results and
benefits, risk factors if any, must be clearly brought out.
Feasibility report of the project is prepared on the cost estimates and the cost of
generation.
71
ABBREVIATIONS
PI
Profitability index.
CB
Capital budgeting
CFS
Cash flows.
CCFS
EAT
EBIT
CFAT
PVS
PVIF
PBP
Payback period.
ARR
NPV
IRR
B/C
72
BIBLIOGRAPHY
73
BIBLIOGRAPHY
WEBSITES
www.google.com
www.ultratech Cements.com
www.wickipedia.com
74