Anda di halaman 1dari 4

Case 3:14-cv-03872-M Document 22 Filed 02/04/15

Page 1 of 4 PageID 303

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
JAY AUBREY ISAAC HOLLIS
Individually and as Trustee of the
JAY AUBREY ISAAC HOLLIS
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST,

)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of
)
the United States; B. TODD JONES,
)
Director of the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco )
Firearm and Explosives,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
__________________________________________)

Case No.3:14-cv-03872-M

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO


DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMES NOW, Plaintiff Jay Aubrey Isaac Hollis, Individually and as Trustee of the Jay
Aubrey Isaac Hollis Revocable Living Trust, by and through undersigned counsel, and files this,
his Response in Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary
Judgment. In accordance with LR 7.1 and 7.2, this response is accompanied by a brief that sets
forth Plaintiffs contentions of facts and law, argument and authorities.

Case 3:14-cv-03872-M Document 22 Filed 02/04/15

Page 2 of 4 PageID 304

SUMMARY
Defendants argument that machineguns are dangerous and unusual do not apply in the
instant case, as that argument merely refers to a time, place and manner restriction on the carrying
of firearms. Likewise, Defendants ban on entire category of firearms is unconstitutional pursuant
to U.S. v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) and District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).
The ban contained in 922(o) places a substantial burden on protected Second Amendment
conduct and serves no compelling government interest. Therefore, Plaintiff prays that Defendants
Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment be denied.

This, the __4th___ day of February, 2015.


Respectfully submitted,

_/s/ Stephen D. Stamboulieh_____


STEPHEN D. STAMBOULIEH
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
Of Counsel:
Stephen D. Stamboulieh
Stamboulieh Law, PLLC
P.O. Box 4008
Madison, MS 39130
(601) 852-3440
stephen@sdslaw.us
MS Bar No. 102784
Alan Alexander Beck
Law Office of Alan Beck
4780 Governor Drive
San Diego, CA 92122
(619) 971-0414
alan.alexander.beck@gmail.com
CA Bar No. 276646
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Elisha M. Hollis
Attorney At Law

Case 3:14-cv-03872-M Document 22 Filed 02/04/15

P.O. Box 1535


Greenville, TX 75403
Tel: (903) 450-2473
Fax: (903) 200-1290
elishahollis@gmail.com
TX Bar No. 24083189

Page 3 of 4 PageID 305

Case 3:14-cv-03872-M Document 22 Filed 02/04/15

Page 4 of 4 PageID 306

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Stephen D. Stamboulieh, hereby certify that the above Plaintiffs Response in Opposition
to Defendants Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment has been filed
electronically with the Clerk of this Court, which sends notification of such filing to all counsel of
record in this case.
/s/ Stephen D. Stamboulieh
Stephen D. Stamboulieh
Stamboulieh Law, PLLC
P.O. Box 4008
Madison, MS 39130
(601) 852-3440
stephen@sdslaw.us
MS Bar No. 102784

Anda mungkin juga menyukai