Optics Communications
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/optcom
Optoelectronic Research Center of Electronic Department, Shiraz University of Technology, Airport Boulevard, Shiraz, Iran
Electronic and Computer Department, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Zand Boulevard, Shiraz, Iran
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 13 November 2012
Received in revised form
13 March 2013
Accepted 24 March 2013
Available online 16 April 2013
Applying the nite element method, microcavity photonic crystal lter with chiral rods is studied and
tuning of its bandwidth and transmission peak under system's stability condition is discussed. In order to
study the tunability of this structure, the effects of variation in its rods electromagnetic parameters on its
ltering operation are analyzed. It is shown that the increase in the rods' relative permittivity cause the
increase of bandwidth and transmission peak, and also decrease the photonic band gap width. On the
other hand, the increase in the rods' relative permeability cause the decrease of bandwidth and
transmission peak, and also increase the photonic band gap width. In both cases, peak wavelength red
shift occurs. The effects of rods chirality on ltering characteristics are studied. The real and imaginary
terms of chirality is introduced respectively as a cause for worsening and bettering ltering nature of
chiral photonic crystal, while they do not have effect on peak wavelength and photonic band gap. The
effect of dispersive chirality model parameters on structure ltering is discussed and a design of chiral
photonic crystal lters with appropriate high peak amplitude and small bandwidth in optical integrated
circuits is proposed.
& 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Finite element method
Photonic band gap material
Chiral photonic crystal
Dispersive chirality
Optical lter
Filter tunability
1. Introduction
Photonic crystals (PCs) have recently had great applications
in different elds of optical communication, radio frequency,
and terahertz integrated circuits. PCs are a new class of optical
devices made by a periodic modulation of refractive index. PC is
highly dispersive, so the rate of its transmission and reection are
strongly dependent on wavelength. The most important effect
resulting from periodicity is the presence of continuous and
bounded ranges in the frequency domain where there is no
possibility of wave propagation in the structure. These ranges are
called photonic band gap (PBG). There is an allowed frequency band
between each two successive PBGs (and vice versa) where wave
propagation would be possible under certain circumstances [1,2].
Due to their ability in controlling the electromagnetic wave propagation, and also integration, these structures have many applications. The most important applications of this type of structures are
lasers with very small threshold current [3], PC bers (PCFs) [4],
waveguides [5], couplers [6], multiplexers [7], resonators [8], and
other optical devices such as tunable lenses [9], polarization
converters [10] and PC MachZehnder interferometer [11].
Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 711 7266262; fax: +98 711 7353502.
E-mail addresses: a.mehr@sutech.ac.ir (A. Mehr), emami@sutech.ac.ir
(F. Emami), mohajeri@shirazu.ac.ir (F. Mohajeri).
0030-4018/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2013.03.046
2. Theory
2.1. Structure description
As shown in Fig. 1 the proposed structure is designed so that
chiral rods with the radius r and the separation P are embedded in
achiral waveguide. The cavity length, formed by defect, is denoted
by D.
The dielectric silicon waveguide with a predened index of n2, a
constant length L and width of W along x and y, respectively, is
surrounded by air with a width of H. The air layers decrease the
radiation losses [39]. Assume that, the structure in innite along
the z direction so that the variations for each eld components are
considered to be zero along this direction. It is desirable to have
no any reected waves from the structure edges in an innite PC
which could be interfere with the incident eld. Therefore,
absorbing boundary conditions are considered for this simulation
around the main structure. The outer layer is covered by perfect
magnetic conductor (PMC). To reduce the interferences between
incident wave and reected wave from rods, the rods are embedded
far from the exciting source. In this structure and with an innite
dimension, in such a way that there is no any reected electromagnetic wave from the structure edges, perfectly matched layers
(PMLs), with a thickness of , are used. The refractive indices of
these layers are matched with the neighboring layers; at the end of
the dielectric waveguide with n n2 and air with n1.
Dene as the distance from the PML edge. To diminish the
electromagnetic waves inside these layers, the electrical conductivity must be chosen as [40]
s sm
2
89
3a
B
jE
BPE
3b
D C Ej H
4a
c0
B C H j
E
c0
4b
p
In these equations is chirality factor, and c0 1= 0 0 is the
speed of light in vacuum. The relation between permittivity,
permeability, and chirality of these two models are as follows [41]:
BPE C ;
BPE C 2 =c0 2 C ;
=c0 C
90
Table1
Simulation parameters.
Parameter
Value
Description
n1
n2
L
W
P
D
H
K
0
1
3.4
6200 nm
434 nm
364.25 nm
503.75 nm
558 nm
77.5 nm
310 106
1550 nm
0.4 pm2
1
7:23 m
following equation:
!
js 1
2
H z r k0 H z 0
r
0
10
p
Z C =C of rods and reduce of its difference with waveguide's
characteristic impedance. So, the transmission peak is increased
with the increase of relative permittivity of rods.
This gure also shows that the increase in relative permittivity
of PC rods not only increases the peak value, but also it causes the
shift of peak wavelength to the higher wavelengths. This shift is
acceptable similar to shift of the reection peak wavelength of
Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) with the increase of effective refractive
index (neff) based on its relation as [44]
B 2nef f
11
91
12
92
Fig. 9. Transmission peak of CPC versus real part of chirality factor, peak wavelength
is constant and equal to 1604.3 nm.
Fig. 10. FWHM of CPC versus real part of chirality factor, peak wavelength is
constant and equal to 1604.3 nm.
Fig. 11. Transmission of CPC versus peak wavelength for different imaginary parts
of chirality factor.
Fig. 12. FWHM of CPC versus peak wavelength for different imaginary parts of
chirality factor.
k 2k
j2k k
2k 2
13
Fig. 13. Real and imaginary part of dispersive chirality factor versus wavelength,
parameters of Condon model are k 0.025 fs , k 0.5, k 1.55 m.
93
Fig. 14. Transmission pulse of CPC versus wavelength for parameters of Condon
model as k 0.025 fs , k 0.5, k 1.55 m; Wave propagation is shown at
21550 nm, 1 1650 nm.
Fig. 15. (a) Transmission peak, (b) FWHM of CPC versus resonant wavelength;
other parameters of the Condon model are k 0.5 , k 0.025 fs.
94
4. Conclusion
Fig. 16. (a) Transmission peak, (b) FWHM of CPC versus damping factor; other
parameters of the Condon model are k 1.55 m , k 0.025 fs.
Fig. 17. Transmission peak, (b) FWHM of CPC versus magneto electric coupling
factor; other parameters of the Condon model are k 0.5 , k 1.55 m.
95