Experimental study and CFD approach for scroll type expander used in
low-temperature organic Rankine cycle
Jen-Chieh Chang a, Chao-Wei Chang b, Tzu-Chen Hung c, *, Jaw-Ren Lin d,
Kuo-Chen Huang e
a
Graduate Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
Institute of Mechatronic Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
d
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Taoyuan Innovation Institute of Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan
e
Kwan Chiu Radio Mfg. Co. Ltd, Taoyuan, Taiwan
b
c
h i g h l i g h t s
Scroll expanders with various built-in volume ratios were experimentally studied.
ORC efciency of 7.77% was obtained at system temperature difference of 60.6 C.
The internal behaviors of scroll expander have been numerically investigated.
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 15 January 2014
Accepted 21 August 2014
Available online 30 August 2014
This study focuses on experimental test of scroll type expanders in low-temperature organic Rankine
cycle (ORC) system. In this circuit, lubricant has been mixed with R245fa as working uid. In this
experiment, two scroll expanders with different built-in volume ratio have been experimentally tested.
Main test parameters considered are the pressure difference and the rotational speed of the expanders. It
is found that the expander performance could be signicantly improved when bigger built-in volume
ratio is used. However the internal leakage and friction loss are vital factors to inuence expander
performance. The maximum shaft power output by expander of 1.77 kW and deliver electricity by
generator of 1.375 kW. A Computational Fluid Dynamics approach (CFD) has been employed for preliminary investigation on the thermal-hydraulic behavior of the scroll type expanders. The simulation
result shows that unbalance pressure distribution were occurred in the expander by means of top scroll
wrap has been modied.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Organic Rankine cycle
Low-temperature
Scroll expander
Built-in volume ratio
CFD
1. Introduction
The issues, like consumption of fossil fuels and CO2 caused
global warming, have seriously started threatening this planet in
the recent decades. Therefore, power generation using organic
Rankine cycle (ORC) in recovering low-grade energy sources, which
have been always ignored, has been paid much attention more and
more. In recent years, some ORC systems beyond 100 kWe are
available on the market for the heat recovery or geothermal power
plant. Even so, there are still tremendous amount of scattered lowgrade but available energy all over the world, such as industrial
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 886 2 2771 2171x2021; fax: 886 2 2731 7191.
E-mail addresses: tchung@ntut.edu.tw, smallstst@gmail.com (T.-C. Hung).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.08.050
1359-4311/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Nomenclature
h
k
m_
P
T
t
V
.
V
_
W
enthalpy, kJ/kg
thermal conductivity, W/m K
mass ow rate, kg/s
pressure, bar
temperature, C
time, s
volume, mm3
velocity vector
work, kW
Greek symbols
h
efciency
r
density, kg/m3
m
dynamic viscosity, N s/m2
Subscript
exp
in
out
abs
d
s
th
V
expander
inlet
outlet
absolute
discharge
isentropic
theoretical
volumetric
1445
Table 1
List of experimental performances on ORC system.
Authors
Nguyen et al. [19]
Kang [20]
Pei et al. [21]
Li et al. [22]
Li et al. [23]
Qiu et al. [8]
Peterson et al. [12]
Kane et al. [13]
Lemort et al. [14]
Quoilin et al. [17]
Declaye et al. [24]
Manolakos et al. [25]
Saitoh et al. [26]
Wang et al. [9]
Zheng et al. [10]
Working
uid
Temperature
range ( C)
Type of
expander
hexp (%)
n-Pentane
R245fa
R123
R123
R123
HFE-7000
R123
R123/R134a
R245fa
R123
R245fa
R134a
R113
R245fa
R245fa
31e81
37.4-85.4
28.2e101
14e119.6
3.8e99.5
46.2e118.6
35.3e168.9
7e165
68.4e139
25e130s
26.6e97.5
37e60
35e136
14e115
23e87.7
Turbine
Turbine
Turbine
Turbine
Turbine
Multi-vane
Scroll
Scroll
Scroll
Scroll
Scroll
Scroll
Scroll
Rolling-piston
Rolling-piston
49.8
82.2
62.5
58.53
68
53.92
49.9
67
71.03
68
75
50
65
45.2
43.3
Max.
1446
It seems that positive-displacement type expander is a relatively favorable expansion machine for small-scale ORCs because
it has characteristics of small ow rate and high built-in volume
ratio. However, to the authors' knowledge, it should be properly
mixed with moderate lubricant especially during high rotational
speed. Up to now, only few researchers used the lubricant in the
ORC cycle [12,13,15,23]. Since the lubricant has advantages such
as sealing and lubricating the moving part of the expander, the
present cycle has been lled by a mixture of R245fa and lubricant at a moderate concentration in order to satisfy smooth
operation of the expanders. Fig. 2 shows the picture of experimental layout of the system and geometries of scroll expanders.
Comparing both expanders, the scroll wrap of Vr3 has longer
crank angle and with modication in scroll tip, which effects
would be numerically simulated to compare the expansion
behavior.
3. Mathematic model and numerical approach
3.1. Fundamental equations
The state of the working uid in the cycle could be determined
by any two intensive thermodynamic properties:
x f 2; f
(1)
Table 3
Basic parameters of the scroll expanders.
Measure device
Range
Accuracy
Symbols
Pressures
Refrigerant ow rate
Temperature
Rotational speed
0-30 bar
1.9e37.9 L/min
160 to 400 C
10 to 99,999 RPM
Basic circle
radius (mm)
Wrap
height
(mm)
Pitch
(mm)
Wall
thickness
(mm)
Suction
volume
(cm3/rev)
Built-in
volume
ratio ()
Vr2
Vr3
3.21
2.59
33
41
20.17
16.27
4.58
4.0
40.81
35
2.12
2.95
1447
_ exp
W
m_ hexp;in hexp;out
(2)
hexp
hexp;in hexp;out
hexp;in hexp;out;s
(3)
hV
m_ th
m_ actual
(4)
Continuity equation:
.
vr
V$ r V 0
vt
(5)
Momentum equation:
1
0 .
.
.
vV .
@
V V$ V A VP mV2 V
r
vt
(6)
Energy equation:
.
v
rh V$ rV h V$ kVT
vt
(7)
1448
Table 4
Mesh independent test of CFD simulation.
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Mesh#
99,406
154,730
234,512
0.07157
0.07189
0.07197
4.10
4.08
4.08
4. Results
4.1. Experimental performance
In the experiment, the steady-state operating points were
remained for at least 20 min to record the data in order to evaluate
the overall performance with parameters such as system pressure
difference and the rotational speed of expanders. The rotational
speeds of expanders are adjusted through the resistor values of
power resistors. During all tests conditions, the superheating at the
expander inlet is maintained at 3 1 K, which value is adjusted by
means of given heat source and system ow rate.
According to the theory of error propagation, the root-sumsquare method was implemented to calculate measurement uncertainty. In the following equation, uR means the uncertainty; the
variable R is calculated as function of the uncertaintiesuxi [39].
"
uR
L
X
vR
i1
vxi
2 #0:5
u xi
(8)
Fig. 6 shows the efciency of scroll expanders versus the rotational speed at different pressure difference between inlet and exit
of the expander. Pexp,in and Pexp,out represents the pressures at the
inlet and exit of the expander, respectively. Since the load of the
expander is adjusted by power resistors, the rotational speeds of
the expander can hardly be precisely predicted. As indicated in this
gure, the curves of the efciency of Vr2 expander have similar
trend over the rotational speed. It exhibits a maximum isentropic
efciency as expanders are operated at lower rotational speed. This
implies the fact that at higher rotational speed, the internal friction
loss of the scroll wrap and bearing losses would simultaneously
increases. As indicated in the gure, the isentropic efciency
slightly decreases as inlet pressure of the expander increases,
because a greater interior leakage occurs in the expansion
Fig. 5. Comparison of mass ow rate between experimental data and CFD simulation
at pressure difference of expander of 5.2 bars.
Fig. 6. Variation of expander isentropic efciency versus rotational speeds for Vr2 and
Vr3 at different operational pressure differences.
1449
Fig. 8. Performance with respect to the pressure difference of two expanders under
two specic rotational speeds.
smaller pressure difference. Results indicate that when the operation pressure is low, low rotational speed is preferred. Due to that
Vr3 one has greater built-in volume ratio, the inuence of the
rotational speed has the similar trend like that of Vr2. However, as
the pressure difference is greater than about 6 bars, the rotational
speed should be changed to higher value. Otherwise, the internal
leakage would be enhanced to cause a lower efciency for the
expander. Therefore, as pressure difference is operated under the
condition of more than 6 bars, the rotational speed may be
controlled above 2400 RPM to ensure proper performance.
Fig. 9 compares the power produced by two Vr expanders at
pressure difference of 5.2 bars. As rotational speed is increased, i.e.,
the increasing of ow rate, the power produced by expander would
be raised. The maximum power by Vr2 is 1.34 kW at operational
parameter of rotational speed of 2920 RPM and mean inlet pressure
of 7.4 bars, with corresponding electricity delivered by generator of
1 kWe. It can be seen that as rotational speed of Vr3 is higher than
around 2300 RPM, the expander performance would be signicantly higher than Vr2 because of bigger built-in volume ratio.
Under this pressure difference, a maximum shaft power by Vr3 is
1.43 kW and electricity generated by generator of 1.1 kW at rotational speed of 3052 RPM. The mean generator efciency was
measured around 70% overall test conditions.
Fig. 9. Variation of power and electricity delivery versus rotational speed of expanders
at pressure difference of 5.2 bars.
1450
Fig. 10. Pressure distribution during a cycle of Vr3 expander via CFD simulation: (a)
suction process, (b) suction completed, (c) expansion completed, (d) discharge process.
Fig. 11. Pressure distribution during the suction process of Vr2 expander: (a) suction
process, (b) suction completed.
Fig. 13. PeV behavior of Vr3 expander operating at different rotational speeds.
1451
5. Conclusions
This study focuses on the performance investigation of two Vrtype of scroll expanders, which has been tested on ORC system. The
expanders are modied from the refrigerant compressor of automobile HVAC system. Main conclusions are given below:
Fig. 14. Tes diagram with the states of ORC experiment result.
(1) Under a specic pressure difference, the increase in rotational speed of the expander would cause its efciency lower.
However, as lowering shaft speed, the internal leakage would
be increased. Therefore, optimal operational region has to be
identied to achieve better efciency.
(2) PeV diagram from simulation results shows that bigger Vr of
expander can effectively enhance the capability of heat-topower conversion,
(3) So far, a maximum cycle efciency of 7.77% was reached at
the system temperature difference of 60.6 C by the use of
Vr3 expander. Higher ORC efciency is expected by the use of
bigger Vr-type expander greater range in temperature
difference.
(4) Slight deviation exists between the results of experiment and
CFD simulations. CFD simulations indicate that a better
involute scroll wrap could efciently improve the suction
loss. CFD simulation also indicates that the performance of
the expander would be improved by the increase of built-in
volume ratio.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the National Science
Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan for their nancial support
of this research under Contract No. NSC101-2221-E-027-039.
References
Fig. 15. Cycle efciency with respect to the expander pressure difference for different
studies (see Table 5).
Table 5
Some experiment studies for ORC system.
Authors
System
temperature
difference
Working
uid
Power
output (kW)
ORC
efciency (%)
23e87.7
35e168.9
13.2e165
37.4e85.4
28.2e101
26.6e97.5
25.8e86.4
R245fa
R123
R123
R245fa
R123
R245fa
R245fa
0.34
0.256
1.82
32.7
1.36
2.1
1.74
5
7.2
7.4
5.22
6.8
8.54
7.77
[1] T.C. Hung, T.Y. Shai, S.K. Wang, A review of organic rankine cycles (ORCs) for
the recovery of low-grade waste heat, Energy 22 (1997) 661e667.
[2] T.C. Hung, Waste heat recovery of organic Rankine cycle using dry uids,
Energy Convers. Manag. 26 (2001) 239e251.
[3] T.C. Hung, S.K. Wang, C.H. Kuo, B.S. Pei, K.F. Tsai, A study of organic working
uids on system efciency of an ORC using low-grade energy sources, Energy
35 (2010) 1403e1411.
[4] C.R. Kuo, S.W. Hsu, K.H. Chang, C.C. Wang, Analysis of a 50 kW organic Rankine
cycle system, Energy 36 (2010) 5877e5885.
[5] G. Qiu, H. Liu, S. Riffat, Expanders for micro-CHP systems with organic Rankine
cycle, Appl. Therm. Eng. 31 (2011) 3301e3307.
[6] O. Badr, P.W. O'Callaghan, M. Hussein, S.D. Probert, Multi vane expanders as
prime movers for low-grade energy organic Rankine cycle engines, Appl.
Energy 16 (1984) 129e146.
[7] O. Badr, P.W. O'Callaghan, S.D. Probert, Multi-vane expanders: geometry and
vane kinematics, Appl. Energy 19 (1985) 159e182.
[8] G. Qiu, Y. Shao, J. Li, H. Liu, S.B. Riffat, Experimental investigation of a biomassred ORC-based micro-CHP for domestic applications, Fuel 96 (2012)
374e382.
[9] X.D. Wang, L. Zhao, J.L. Wang, W.Z. Zhang, X.Z. Zhao, W. Wu, Performance
evaluation of a low-temperature solar Rankine cycle system utilizing R245fa,
Sol. Energy 84 (2010) 353e364.
[10] N. Zheng, L. Zhao, X.D. Wang, Y.T. Tan, Experimental verication of a rollingpiston expander that applied for low-temperature Organic Rankine Cycle,
Appl. Energy 112 (2013) 1265e1274.
[11] W. Wang, Y. Wu, C. Ma, L. Liu, J. Yu, Preliminary experimental study of single
screw expander prototype, Appl. Therm. Eng. 31 (2011) 3684e3688.
[12] R.B. Peterson, H. Wang, T. Herron, Performance of a small-scale regenerative
Rankine power cycle employing a scroll expander, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part
A Power Energy 222 (2008) 271e282.
[13] M. Kane, D. Larrain, D. Favrat, Y. Allani, Small hybrid solar power system,
Energy 28 (2003) 1427e1443.
[14] V. Lemort, S. Declaye, S. Quoilin, Experimental characterization of a hermetic
scroll expander for use in a micro-scale Rankine cycle, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
Part A Power Energy 226 (2011) 126e136.
[15] R. Bracco, S. Clemente, D. Micheli, M. Reini, Experimental tests and modelization of a domestic-scale ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle), Energy 58 (2013)
107e116.
1452