Keywords: job performance, job satisfaction, leadership behavior and organizational culture
The development of education quality must be supported by the
human resource which is able to do the main task and its function
professionally. For teachers to be result(s) oriented, they need to be
knowledgeable about the subject content, committed to achieve the
aims of national education (Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan,
2008). However, facts on ground indicate that there still exists low
teacher performance in Sukabumi and this phenomenon is attributed
to human resource management. Results from previous findings
shows that from 493 teachers, 148 teachers or 30% make syllabus
and lesson planning, 128 teachers or 26% use variant methods in
implementing the learning teaching activities, other teachers use
speech method, and only 74 teachers or 15% implement the national
education curriculum. Situation in the field demonstrates that 65% of
the total number of techer's activelly takes professional development
seminars and workshops (Bagian Kepegawaian Dinas Pendidikan
Kota Sukabumi. September 2012).
One factor that researchers identify as critical to fostering
improved school academic achievement is the leadership ability to
motivate teachers (Rowan, Chiang, & Miller, 1997). Studies
indicated that the principal has a key role in initiating and affecting
the level of teacher motivation demonstrated in the school.
Ultimately, how well a leader supports and encourages teacher
motivation may directly affect the degree of school academic
achievement that occurs in the school (Weller & Weller, 2000;
Williams, 2000).
Increasingly, the literature from educational leadership and
business portray the importance of examining motivation within the
framework of organizational culture to determine the quality and
development of private and public institutions (Owens, 1991).
Organizational culture is a component of organizational climate, and
refers to the ways of thinking that are characteristic of the group of
Correspondence should be sent to Karantiano Sadasa, Study
Program of Educational Management, Pakuan University, Bogor,
West Java Province, Indonesia
1638
Method
3
4
5
6
7
8
Range
Mean
Median
Mode
Standard Deviation
Variance
42
151.88
154
155
9.47
89.73
60
138.27
138.41
137
11.09
123.03
50
135.79
135
133
9.52
90.73
53
151.94
152
152
9,36
87.67
The study population was civil servant teachers from all government
owned Junior High Schools in Sukabumi. In order to obtain a
representative sample of respondents for the study, certified teachers
were obtained through proportional random sampling techniques
totaling to 221 (Sugiyono, 2005).
Instruments
Table 2: Coefficients
Participants
Procedure
The subjects were individually administered the above mentioned
measures under the supervision of the researcher. The subjects were
well instructed and the investigator established a good rapport with
respondents. These measures were instructed and processed in
Indonesian language. All respondents were contacts in their schools
during free time after making appointment with them. Data collected
were scored and tabulated before statistical analysis, the ratings
given by respondents in usual manner where positive items were
scored in a reverse manner for negative items.
Model
(Constant)
1 X1
X2
Standardized
Coefficients
Std. Error
Beta
24.002
.588
.163
7.464
.059
.050
.585
.190
Sig.
3.216
9.948
3.226
.001
.000
.001
Tstatistics
ttable ( = 0,05)
0.585
0.190
9.948
3.226
1.971
1.971
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized t
Coefficients
31
32
Table 4: Coefficients
Model
Results
To achieve the objectives of the study, correlation and regression was
used to establish the relationship between organizational culture,
leadership and job satisfaction using (SPSS version 20 for Windows)
software program.
Unstandardized
Coefficients
(Constant)
X1
1 X2
X3
Std. Error
Beta
73.070
.100
.357
.206
8.813
.082
.060
.078
.100
.423
.210
8.291
2.122
5.986
2.640
Sig.
.000
.009
.000
.009
a. Dependent Variable: X4
Sr.
1
2
Description
Min
Max
Variable
X1
X2
X3
X4
170
128
100
160
109
159
119
172
taritmathic > ttabel (5.986 > 1,971) and path coefficient score 42 = 0.210 in
which taritmathic > ttabel (2.640 >1.971). The number of unexplained
variance by X1, X2, X3 and X4 variables is 2 =
Therefore, it can be concluded that both analysis in multiple and
partially show that organizational culture, leadership behavior, and
job satisfaction influence the teachers' performances.
Next, it can be seen clausal form among sub-structure-2 variables,
path coefficient score and correlation coefficient for each path in
Summary of Path Coefficient and Correlation Coefficient and figure
4, are as follows:
Table 5: Summary of Path and Correlation Coefficients in SubStructural-2
Path Coefficient
41
42
43
Taritmathic
ttable ( = 0,05)
0.100
0.423
0.210
2.122
5.986
2.640
1.971
1.971
1.971
According to the result of clausal significance test conducted to substructural-1 model which consists of the influence of organizational
culture toward the job satisfaction (31) and leadership behavior
toward job satisfaction (32), and the test of sub-structural-2 model
which consists of the influence of organizational culture toward
teachers' job performances (31), leadership behavior toward job
satisfaction (32), and the influence of job satisfaction toward
teachers' job performances (43), so the result of test can be
summarized in Table 11 as follows:
1639
1640
Path Coefficients
Among
Variables
Indirect
through X3
Total
Influences
X1 to X4
41
0.100
0.100
0.123
0.223
X2 to X4
42
0.423
0.423
0.040
0.463
X3 to X4
43
0.210
0.210
0.210
X1 to X3
31
0.585
0.585
0.585
X2 to X3
32
0.190
0.190
0.190
Discussion
Results of the present study revealed that organizational culture,
leadership and job satisfaction significantly influence teachers'
performance of junior high schools in Sukabumi, these finding are in
line with most theories of organizational behaviors (Robbins, 2002,
2006, 2008; Slocum, 2011) in which organizational culture is the
soul of all organizational existence which can be the guideline and
base for the members to involve, develop self-potentials, express
ideas and ability for the progress of organization.
Organizational culture in the present study was measured through
indicators of values, tradition, belief, rules, commitment, and
communication pattern, which become the agreed references values
which are understood and implemented in the internal life of
organization (Simanjuntak, 2005).
Leadership behavior of all junior high schools in Sukabumi
influence teachers' job satisfaction. The research also discovered that
leadership behavior will also influence teachers' job satisfaction. As
well as the above described individual factors, the research also
showed that factors at the organization level, such as the
organizational culture, also have an effect on job satisfaction. This
result is consistent with the results of (Gifford et al.). It is important
for school administrators to establish a good organizational
infrastructure in addition to improving the working environment in
1641
1642
Conclusion
Culture within an organization is very important, playing a large role
in whether or not the organization is a happy and healthy place to
work. Through communicating and promoting the organizational
vision to subordinates, and in getting their acknowledgment of the
vision, it is possible to influence their job satisfaction and
performance. When there is good interaction between the leader and
subordinates, there will be contributions to team communication and
collaboration, and encouragement of subordinates to accomplish the
mission and objectives assigned by the organization, which in turn
enhances job satisfaction.
References
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (2008), Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Badan
Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Laporan Ujian Nasional
Tahun Pelajaran. Sistem Informasi Hasil Ujian Nasional. Jakarta, 2008.
Bagian Kepegawaian Dinas Pendidikan Kota Sukabumi. September 2012.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London, UK:
Tavistock.
Burt, R. S., Gabbay, S. M., Holt, G., & Moran, P. (1994). Contingent organization as a
network theory: The culture-performance contingency function. Acta Sociologica,
37(4), 345-370.
DuBrin, A. J. (2012). Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills. Belmont, CA:
Cengage South-Western.
Khan, A. H. (2012), Impact of job satisfaction on employee performance: an empirical
study of autonomous medical institutions of Pakistan. African Journal of Business
Management, 6 (7).
Kopelman, R. E., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1990). The role of climate and culture in
productivity. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 282318). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kotter, J. (2012). Corporate culture and performance. New York, NY: Free Press.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. O. (2012). Educational administration: Concepts and
practices (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Wadsworth.
Liang, T. (2011). Relationship between leadership behaviors and task performance: the
mediation role of job satisfaction and the moderation role of social distance. African
Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5. No.14.
Newstrom, J.W. (2008). Organizational Behavior: Human behavior at work. New
York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Owens, R. (1991). Organizational behavior in education: Instructional leadership and
school reform (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Robbins (2002). Essential of organizational behavior, 5th ed. New Jersey: Printice Hall,
Inc.
Robbins (2006). Organizational Behavior : Concep, Controversies, Aplications. New
Jersey: Printice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs.
Robbins (2008). Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Application, Third
Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall..
Rowan, B., Chiang, F., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees'
performance to study the effects of teachers on student achievement. Sociology of
Education, 70(4), 256-284.
Simanjuntak, P. J. (2005). Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kinerja. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit
Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Slocum (2011). Organizational Behavior, 13thedition. South-Western: Cengage
Learning, USA.
Sugiyono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Vecchio, R. P. (2006). Orgnizational Behavior. Ohio: South Western Thomson Corporation.
Weller, L., & Weller, S. (2000). Quality human resources leadership: A principal'
shandbook. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.