Dr Sangeeta Desai
Renal vein usually retracts and may give false impression of margin involvement, if the
tumour is in close proximity.
Essential features that must be documented in a histology report
Tumor type, favorable/ unfavorable histology
Extent of invasion, capsular invasion, status of renal sinus
Vascular / lymphatic emboli
Tumor kidney interface, nephrogenic rests
Margins
Lymph nodes number, metastasis +/-
Wilms tumour
Accurate staging and histology are very important since the therapeutic protocols are
stage related. Hence clinical stage determined by imaging and the operating surgeon
and pathologic stage determined by systematic gross and histologic examination are of
utmost importance.
Gross
There is nothing distinctive about gross features of WT. However, bilaterality,
multicentricity and renal vein thrombosis are more common in WT than in other renal
tumours.
Microscopy
Histology of WT is a recapitulation of nephrogenesis and aberrant epithelial and /or
mesenchymal differentiation. Depending on the predominance of the blastemal,
epithelial and mesenchymal elements, WT is characteristically described as tri-, bi- or
mono- phasic. Subtypes are classical triphasic (59%), blastemal predominant (25%),
epithelial predominant (8%) and mesenchymal predominant (8%). The predominant
pattern is the one which is noted in > 80% tumor. In pre-chemothrapy era, these
subtypes were important as the blastemal tumors fared badly; however in todays
chemotherapy era blastema is chemo sensitive while epithelial dominant tumors are
resistant to treatment
The reporting pathologist should be aware of nuclear details of blastema, since this
knowledge helps distinguish blastemal WT from the other NWT particularly on
aspiration cytology and biopsy. In blastemal cells, the ratio of length of the nucleus to
its width is <3; whereas in the cells of the mesenchymal elements the ratio is >3.
Anaplasia in WT
Anaplasia is rare in WT cases <2 years of age.
Criteria for anaplasia are as follows: 1. Macronucleation: At least 3 fold nuclear
enlargement as compared with the nuclei of adjacent tumour cells which belong to the
same lineage. 2. Hyperchromasia 3. Markedly enlarged multipolar mitotic figures. The
diagnosis of anaplasia is made when all the three criteria meet and on scanner or low
power since the hyperchromatic enlarged nuclei stand out.
Anaplasia is classified as focal and diffuse. WT without anaplasia or with focal
anaplasia in any stage or diffuse anaplasia is stage I is categorized as tumour of
favourable histology (FH). Diffuse anaplasia in stage II, III, and IV is categorized as
anaplastic morphology, which denotes unfavourable histology (UH).
Please refer to the Suggested references for details on Anaplasia.
Staging of WT
Confirming or extending the clinical stage is one of the most important objectives of
pathologic study of the nephrectomy specimens. A case of stage I WT is converted to
stage II if the completely excised tumour is found: a. to extend into the perirenal soft
tissues or b. into the renal sinus lymphatics or blood vessels.
Stage II is converted to stage III if the tumour is found to be at the surgical resection
margin or lymph node metastasis.
Stage I WT with FH represents a WT, which is confined to the kidney and is completely
resected. It is associated with over 90% survival. However, relapse does occur in a few
patients with stage I FH WT. In recent years, two parameters, <550 g nephrectomy
specimen and age < 2 years have been correlated with the least possibility of relapse.
Gross
MN is usually large relative to the infant's kidney. Externally, the surface of the tumor
and kidney is smooth and the renal capsule and calyceal systems are stretched over
the tumor. The surface may be bosselated. The cut surface resembles that of a
leiomyoma: firm, whorled or trabeculated, and light colored. The tumor is
unencapsulated, typically interdigitates with the surrounding kidney, and may extend
into surrounding tissues. Renal vein invasion also occurs occasionally. Cysts,
hemorrhage, and necrosis are present in a minority of cases, particularly those that are
cellular on microscopic examination.
Microscopy
The classical pattern of MN is a moderately cellular proliferation of thick interlacing
bundles of spindle cells with elongate nuclei which usually infiltrate renal and perirenal
tissues. Entrapment of glomeruli and renal tubules is common. Mitotic figures are
usually in the range of 0 to 1 per 10 high power fields. Islands of cartilage and foci of
extramedullary hematopoiesis are present in some tumors.
Another, more common, pattern consists of a densely cellular proliferation of polygonal
cells with mitotic figures in the range of 8-30 per 10 high power fields, and often
pushing borders. This pattern has been called cellular MN. Cysts are common in this
pattern. The classical and cellular patterns often are mixed in the same tumor. Age and
completeness of resection are the primary risk factors for adverse outcome of MN, and
not histopathologic pattern.
There are cases which display overlap of cellular variant of MN and spindled variant of
CCSK, which suggests pathogenetic relationship between the two.
Differential diagnosis
MN usually is easily diagnosed when the histology and patients age are considered.
Preoperatively treated WT with stromal predominance may be confused with
congenital mesoblastic nephroma. This problem can usually be resolved by the
providing attention to the age, bilaterality, identification of blastema, nephrogenic rests
and tumour border.
CCSK
Originally called "bone-metastasizing renal tumor of childhood", CCSK is responsible
for maximum diagnostic discrepancies due to overlapping and variant patterns and is a
highly malignant neoplasm resistant to conventional therapy for WT, but often
responsive to doxorubicin-containing regimens. Thus, it is of considerable therapeutic
importance that CCSK be correctly diagnosed.
Pathology of Renal Tumors
Gaya Prasad Memorial Pathology Symposium
APCON 2005, Indore; 2nd December, 2005
Occurring in the same general age range as WT, CCSK comprises approximately 6%
of pediatric renal tumors. Most are diagnosed in patients between 12 and 36 months of
age. Approximately 66% of the patients are male. The propensity for metastasis to
bone and unusual sites is marked.
Gross
The appearance of the cut surfaces of this tumor is variable: it may be homogeneous,
gray and lobular or variegated, including firm gray whorled tissue and light pink soft
areas. Occasionally, the tumor may produce abundant mucin which gives a slimy
glistening appearance. Most appear well-circumscribed. Cysts ranging from a few
millimeters to centimeters in diameter are present in approximately a third of cases.
Often, the tumor weighs more than 500 g. Bilaterality has not been reported.
Microscopic
At low magnification, CCSK usually consists of a monotonous sheet of cells with lightly
staining cytoplasm. At higher magnification, the cells are arranged in cords separated
by septa composed of spindle cells with dark nuclei and a distinctive branching pattern
of small blood vessels. The cells in the cords have pale or vacuolated cytoplasm and
indistinct borders. Despite the name, the cytoplasm of CCSK is usually much less clear
than that of clear cell RCC and cytoplasmic clarity should not be relied upon to
establish the diagnosis. The nuclei contain finely dispersed chromatin and the nucleoli
are small. A characteristic feature is the infiltrative border between the CCSK and the
surrounding renal parenchyma.
Confusing variant patterns occur, including epithelioid, spindle cell, myxoid, cystic,
hyaline sclerosis, palisading and monstrocellular. The tumor should be sampled
generously to find classical areas.
Differential diagnosis
The distinctive vascular pattern and nuclear features of CCSK are often helpful in
distinguishing it from WT. However, in addition, some important points are as follows:
CCSK is unilateral and unicentric with infiltrative borders, unassociated with syndromes
and precursor lesions, blastema and nonrenal elements such as cartilage or muscle
are not found in CCSK and sclerotic stroma is uncommon in WT before therapy.
Exceptionally, CCSK may contain foci in which the cells have prominent nucleoli,
similar to those of RTK; other areas with classic pattern and lack of extreme
invasiveness, typical of CCSK usually will clarify the diagnosis.
Rhabdoid tumor of kidney (RTK)
The most malignant renal neoplasm of childhood, RTK is usually diagnosed in
advanced stage and metastasizes widely and causes death within 1 year of diagnosis.
The patients usually are very young at the time of diagnosis (NWTS median age 11
Pathology of Renal Tumors
Gaya Prasad Memorial Pathology Symposium
APCON 2005, Indore; 2nd December, 2005
months, and rare after 3 years) and there is a 1.5:1 predominance of boys to girls.
Associations with embryonal tumors of the central nervous system, neurovascular
hamartoma, paraneoplastic hypercalcemia and chromosome 22q11-12, 11p15.5
abnormalities have been reported.
Gross
RTK lacks the appearance of encapsulation often seen in cases of WT or CCSK. The
tumors usually are located medially in the kidney and the renal sinus and pelvis are
almost always infiltrated. They are typically yellow-gray or light tan friable tumors with
indistinct borders. Necrosis and hemorrhage are common.
Microscopy
RTK is typically diffuse and monotonous with poorly defined border. It consists of
medium or large polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, round nuclei
with thick nuclear membranes and large nucleoli. It is the resemblance of the
cytoplasm of these cells to differentiating rhabdomyoblasts which gave the tumor its
name. However, the resemblance to skeletal muscle is merely superficial and if definite
evidence of differentiation toward skeletal muscle is present, the tumor is not a
rhabdoid tumor. Often, the cytoplasm contains a large eosinophilic globular inclusion
which displaces the nucleus. Electron microscopy has shown that these consist of
aggregates of whorled filaments. As more cases have accrued to the NWTS, a wide
range of patterns has been appreciated, including sclerosing, epithelioid, spindle cell,
lymphomatoid, vascular, pseudopapillary, and cystic. Typically, these patterns are
mixed with the common pattern and with each other. The characteristic nuclear
features of large centrally placed nucleoli and thick nuclear membranes are usually
retained.
Differential diagnosis
A wide variety of renal and extrarenal tumors may mimic rhabdoid tumor in routine
sections. Cases of WT, congenital MN, RCC, urothelial carcinoma, collecting duct
carcinoma, oncocytoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and
lymphoma have been confused with RTK. Filamentous cytoplasmic inclusions or
conspicuous macronucleoli are the misleading features in most cases. Conventional
light microscopy is able to clarify most cases, but electron microscopy and
immunohistochemistry are sometimes necessary to show the characteristic features of
the mimics and exclude RTK. Occasionally, blastemal cells contain inclusions
suggestive of rhabdoid tumor, but the presence of characteristic aggregates of
blastema, such as nodules or serpentine groupings, clarifies the diagnosis.
RCC
Pathology of Renal Tumors
Gaya Prasad Memorial Pathology Symposium
APCON 2005, Indore; 2nd December, 2005
MST is unencapsulated and superficially infiltrates among renal structures. They tend
to infiltrate beneath the urothelium of the renal calices or pelvis. The general
appearance is of a variably cellular proliferation of spindle cells with tapered nuclei and
delicate cytoplasmic processes. The cells surround blood vessels or entrapped renal
tubules, forming hypocellular myxoid onion skin nodules. Entrapped renal tubules show
cystic change, epithelial hyperplasia; entrapped glomeruli show juxtaglomerular
hyperplasia; and entrapped arterioles may show angiodysplasia. Heterologous
differentiation toward glia, cartilage, and neuroectoderm may also be present.
MST is typically immunoreactive to CD34.
Molecular data have revealed that metanephric stromal tumor may represent the
biphasic middle portion of the spectrum of tumors with purely mesenchymal,
mesoblastic nephroma at one end and completely epithelial tumor, metanephric
adenoma at the other end.
Suggested References
1. Charles AK, Vujanic GM, Berry PJ. Renal tumours of childhood. Histopathology
1998; 32: 293-309.
2. Argani P, Perlman EJ, Breslow NE, Browning NG, Green DM, D'Angio GJ,
Beckwith JB. Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney: a review of 351 cases from the
National Wilms Tumor Study Group Pathology Center. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;
24: 4-18.
3. Argani P, Antonescu CR, Illei PB, Lui MY, Timmons CF, Newbury R, Reuter VE,
Garvin AJ, Perez-Atayde AR, Fletcher JA, Beckwith JB, Bridge JA, Ladanyi M.
Primary renal neoplasms with the ASPL-TFE3 gene fusion of alveolar soft part
sarcoma: a distinctive tumor entity previously included among renal cell
carcinomas of children and adolescents. Am J Pathol 2001;159:179-92.
4. Argani P, Hawkins A, Griffin CA, Goldstein JD, Haas M, Beckwith JB, Mankinen
CB, Perlman EJ. A distinctive pediatric renal neoplasm characterized by
epithelioid morphology, basement membrane production, focal HMB45
immunoreactivity, and t(6;11)(p21.1;q12) chromosome translocation. Am J Pathol
2001;158:2089-96.
5. Beckwith JB. National Wilms Tumor Study: an update for pathologists. Pediatr
Dev Pathol 1998; 1:79-84.
6. Faria P, Beckwith JB, Mishra K, Zuppan C, Weeks DA, Breslow N, Green DM.
Focal versus diffuse anaplasia in Wilms tumor--new definitions with prognostic
significance: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Am J Surg
Pathol 1996; 20:909-20.
10
Fig 6. Mesoblastic_nephroma
11
12
13