com/doc/255198015/Averment-of-Jurisdiction-Quo-Warranto-STRATFORD-BOROUGH-MUNICIPAL-COURT
Exhibit A
STRATFORD BOROUGH MUNICIPAL COURT
PATROLMAN VINCENT. JESS; CHIEF RONALD M. MORELLO; GEORGE MANAGER OF STRATFORD DINER
315 UNION AVENUNE
STRATFORD, NEW JERSEY [08084]
Re: 2C:20 8A; SC:29 1A
Res Judicata
Hagans v Lavine 415 U.S. 533., There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction. Joyce v U.S. 474 2d 215;
The law provides that once State and Federal jurisdiction have been challenged, it must be proven. Main v
Thiboutot 100. S. Ct 2501 (1980); "Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time " and "Jurisdiction, once
challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided". Basso v Utah Power and Light Co. 495 F.2d 906,910.
As all government entities and alleged private corporations must be a creature of the American Constitution, this is a formal
Request and Command for STRATFORD BOROUGH MUNICIPAL COURT and/or Patrolman Vincent. JESS, and all involved said
Officers that responded to the allegations made against an Aboriginal/Indigene, to produce for the record, the physical
documented, certified Delegation of Authority Order, as Proof of Jurisdiction, as required by Law, per Article III, Section 1 of the
United States Republic Constitution. I will allow ten (10) days from the date of this Averment of Jurisdiction Quo Warranto and
Discovery, for the requested, authentic document, with original signatures, to be provided to me for my complete review for my
said Defense in the Outlined, Actual occurrence of the matter as follows:
1.) On 31 January 1435 [M.C.] 2015 [C.C.Y.], I was accused of Theft of Services for my having been forced to desperation due
to conspiracy forcing me to said Homelessness. Therefore, I was on the verge of starvation and sought a meal at
STRATFORD DINER, located on White Horse Pike in Stratford, New Jersey. I was given a meal and I was offered to pay for
the meal. I explained to George, who was the Manager of STRATFORD DINER at the time, that I have / had no money /
finance thus I could not accept his offer to pay under my dire hunger circumstances. In honor, I mentioned to George that I
would be willing to wash dishes or something to allegedly compensate for the said meal. However, George immediately
resorted to threatening me and he called the local said Police, where I was falsely arrested and temporarily detained by
Patrolman V. Jess (Badge Number Unknown).
2.) While at STRATFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, I was falsely identified, even though I carry valid, Allodial, National
identification with me. As a Moroccan National, I am aware of my Substantive Rights, which were clearly violated by
Patrolman Vincent Jess. Before being released, Patrolman Vincent. Jess attempted to contract with me, which I refuse ad
infinitum. In spite of my refusal to contract with STRATFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT and/or STRATFORD BOROUGH
MUNICIPAL COURT, Patrolman Vincent Jess wrote up a fraudulent police report and purposely / intentionally misidentified
me as a corporate construct and/or chattel (slave) property, whereas he purported false charges against my Flesh and Blood
being. I do believe that my rights have been severely violated under Color-of-Law and I am prepared to file suit if all
alleged charges are not immediately dismissed for the record.
Page 1 of 2
https://www.scribd.com/doc/255198015/Averment-of-Jurisdiction-Quo-Warranto-STRATFORD-BOROUGH-MUNICIPAL-COURT
PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENTS All officials are required by federal, state, and municipal law to
provide the name, address and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding company and the policy
number of the bond and, if required, a copy of the policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance.
Failure to provide this information constitutes corporate and limited liability insurance fraud (15 USC) and is Prim a Facie
evidence and grounds to impose a lien upon the official personally to secure their public oath and service of office. (18 USC
912).
"Whoever, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the
United States authorizes an oath to be administered, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any
material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined no more than $2,000.00 or
imprisoned not more than five years or both." 18 U.S.C. 1621
Thank You,
I Am:
Jakeem Farouk El
Cc:
United Nations
High Commissioner for Human Rights
Palais Wilson
International Criminal Court
Luis Moreno-Ocampo
International Court of Justice
William Salaam Hall:El
Peace Palace
The Hague Netherland
Interpol
Lyon, France
Page 2 of 2