Introduction
452
lately by Lin et al.,[4] in which only four (C-hydroxylated ritonavir, Ndealkylated ritonavir, N-demethylated and deacylated ritonavir) out
of six metabolites were detected when metabolic reaction was carried
out using CYP3A4 puried from expressed Escherichia coli TOPP3 cells.
While carrying out metabolite characterization using mass
spectrometry tools,[2] we conducted investigations in positive
electrospray ionization (+ESI) mode. We found that ritonavir
was dissociated through six principal mass fragmentation routes,
wherein neutral loss of 44 Da was observed in many fragmentation steps. The exact mass of the losses, calculated from the
difference between accurate (observed) masses of the precursor
and the product ions involved, matched best to CO2
(43.9898 Da). The same observation was made even with
metabolites, where loss of 44 Da occurred during MS2, MS3 or
MS4 transitions. This observation was unusual, as the parent drug
and its metabolites were devoid of a terminal carboxylic acid
group. Apart from the neutral loss of CO2, marked differences
were even observed in fragmentation pathways of the drug
and its metabolites, particularly those that had intact N-methyl
Experimental
Chemicals and materials
Pure ritonavir was obtained as a gratis sample from Ranbaxy
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Gurgaon, India). Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-reduced tetrasodium salt (NADPH), testosterone, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate and potassium dihydrogen
phosphate were purchased from HIMEDIA Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.
(Mumbai, India). rCYP3A4 was acquired from BD Gentest, BD
Biosciences (California, USA). A Zorbax Eclipse XDB, C18 column
(250 mm 4.6 mm, 5 ) from Agilent Technologies (Wilmington,
DE, USA) was used for the separation of the drug and its metabolites.
For liquid chromatographymass spectrometry (LCMS) analyses,
high performance liquid chromatography grade acetonitrile (ACN)
from J.T. Baker (Mexico, USA), purchased locally from RFCL Limited,
Mohali, India was used. Ultra pure water was obtained from a water
purication unit (ELGA, Bucks, England).
Instruments
For liquid chromatographyhigh resolution mass spectrometry
(LCHRMS) studies, a 1100 series LC from Agilent Technologies
(Waldronn, Germany) connected to a time-of-ight MS (MicrOTOFQ, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) was used. The entire unit
was operated using Hystar (ver. 3.1) and MicrOTOF control (ver. 2.0)
software. Liquid chromatographymultiple stage mass spectrometry
(LCMSn) data were acquired using Accela LC (Thermo Electron
Corporation, San Jose, USA), which was connected to a linear ion trap
quadrupole mass spectrometer (LTQXL, Thermo Electron Corporation). Instrument control and data collection were carried out by
using Xcalibur software (ver. 2.0.7 SP1). The mass studies were essentially carried out in +ESI mode after optimization of mass operation
parameters. A 5-mM solution of sodium formate (Sigma-Aldrich
Chemicals, Bangalore, India) was used as a calibrant in HRMS studies.
HDXMS studies were conducted on drug using the MS/TOF system.
Methodology
In silico metabolite prediction
An LC method was rst developed for the separation of the metabolites and their characterization by mass tools. To achieve optimal
separation of the analytes from the polar matrix components, a gradient mode was employed, using a mobile phase composed of ACN
and 10 mM ammonium acetate (pH 4.7). The ow rate and column
temperature were 0.4 ml/min and 25 C, respectively. The initial mobile phase ratio of ACN:buffer was 10:90, which was maintained for
rst 5 min and changed to 90:10 in 40 min. It was held at this composition till 45 min, again brought back to initial ratio in 48 min
and was equilibrated for the next 12 min. This gradient LC method
was employed further in LCHRMS and LCMSn studies, which were
conducted on prepared in vitro incubated samples. Positive ionization mode was selected for LC-MS studies on the metabolites.
The metabolites were not detected in negative ionization mode,
probably due to lack of suitable functional groups. The parent itself
also had very low ionization in the negative mode.
Strategy used for structure elucidation of the metabolites
A generic strategy for the characterization of the metabolites, proposed earlier from our laboratory,[2] was followed in the present
study. The initial step involved the generation of total ion chromatogram (TIC) on rCYP3A4-treated drug sample (including zero
min sample) using LCMS/TOF. It was followed by prediction of
CYP3A4-mediated metabolites by stand-alone computational tool,
like MetaSite. The exact mass of each predicted metabolite and of
those previously reported in the literature were used to generate
post-acquisition extracted ion chromatograms (EICs). The metabolites present in the TIC were identied based on EICs, while the
peaks due to matrix components were segregated by comparison
of the TIC of the sample with the blank (0-min sample). Additionally,
analyses of accurate mass data and monitoring of the characteristic
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
453
S. Jhajra et al.
formed from the molecular ion [M + H]+. Among them, the fragments
of m/z 426 and 296 were most abundant. Some of the fragments were
seen in MSn studies only. The most probable molecular formula for the
ions observed in HRMS studies was calculated from their
accurate masses with the help of an elemental composition
calculator (available from; http://www.wsearch.com.au/Tools/
elemental_composition_calculator.htm). Additionally, HDXMS
studies provided information about the number of labile
hydrogen atoms present in their structures. The whole data are
compiled in Table 1, which also includes HDXMS values, accurate
m/z values for the losses and their probable molecular formulae.
The MSn data, which helped in establishing link among various
observed ions, are listed separately in Table 2. A comprehensive
fragmentation pattern of ritonavir was delineated taking into
account all available data. The same is shown in Fig. 3. Such
comprehensive mass fragmentation of ritonavir is not previously
reported in the literature.
Apparently, the molecular ion of ritonavir ([M + H]+ = m/z 721)
underwent fragmentation through six principal routes to form both
different and common product ions (Fig. 3), highlighting the
protonation at different positions in the drug molecule. Critical
comparison among these routes also revealed that many steps
were essentially similar to each other, with some of them differing
in sequence of losses. The same are individually discussed below:
Route 1: The rst route involved loss of H2O from the parent to
form a product ion of m/z 703, which was attributed to the
protonation of secondary alcoholic group in the drug structure.
The latter underwent further fragmentation through the pathway m/z 703 533 489 347, 250.
Route 2: This route involved cleavage of C30N31 urea amide bond
present in part C of the parent ion to form product of m/z 551,
accompanied with a neutral loss of 1-(2-isopropylthiazol-4-yl)
-N-methylmethanamine, due to the charge present on the tertiary
nitrogen. In this case, the product ion of m/z 533 was formed from
m/z 551 upon the loss of H2O. The latter further followed a
Intens.
+MS2(721.0000), 4.2-4.5min
x10 5
2.5
h
426.1848
2.0
268.1489
q
1.5
0.0
300
500
600
b
677.3316
e d
703.3098
721.3221
[M+H]+
400
606.3119
200
200
533.2236
551.2338
489.2332
507.2438
408.1740
l
n
365.1657
382.1936
296.1434
311.1745
197.0722
250.1560
1.0
0.5
347.1577
700 m/z
454
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
HRMS
data
RDB
Possible
parent ion
721.3221
703.3098
677.3316
606.3119
551.2338
533.2236
507.2438
489.2332
426.1848
408.1740
392
382.1936
365.1657
347.1577
311.1745
C37H49N6O5S2
+
C37H47N6O4S2
+
C36H49N6O3S2
+
C33H44N5O4S
+
C29H35N4O5S
+
C29H33N4O4S
+
C28H35N4O3S
+
C28H33N4O2S
+
C23H28N3O3S
+
C23H26N3O2S
+
C24H30N3O2
+
C22H28N3OS
+
C22H25N2OS
+
C22H23N2S
+
C19H23N2O2
721.3200
703.3095
677.3302
606.3109
551.2323
533.2217
507.2424
489.2319
426.1846
408.1740
392
382.1948
365.1682
347.1576
311.1754
2.1
0.3
1.4
1.1
1.5
1.9
1.4
1.3
0.2
0.0
1.2
2.5
0.1
0.9
16.5
17.5
15.5
14.5
14.5
15.5
13.5
14.5
11.5
12.5
10.5
11.5
12.5
9.5
+
[M + H]
+
[M + H]
+
[M + H]
+
[M + H]
a/d
b/d
e/f
+
[M + H]
d/h
f
b/h
k
g/i/l
f/h/c
o
p*
q
q*
r
296.1434
285
268.1489
268
250.1560
C14H22N3O2S
+
C18H25N2O
+
C13H22N3OS
+
C18H22NO
+
C18H20N
296.1427
285
268.1478
268
250.1590
0.7
1.1
3.0
5.5
4.5
9.5
[M + H]
b
o
h
g/l/q
s
t*
197.0722
171
C9H13N2OS
+
C9H15N2S
197.0743
171
2.1
4.5
q
q
[M + H]
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j*
k
l
m
n, n
Losses
H2O
CO2
C4H5NOS
C8H14N2S
C8H14N2S/H2O
C8H14N2S/CO2
CO2/H2O
C14H21N3O2S
C6H13NO2/H2O
C4H5NOS
C14H21N3O2S/CO2
NH3
C6H10N2O2/CH3NO2S/H2O
C9H12N2OS/C4H5NOS/
C14H21N3O2S
C23H27N3O3S
C18H24N4O2S2
CO
C5H6N2O2S
C10H13N3O2S/C4H5NOS/
H2O
C4H9N
C5H9NO
HDXMS
data
Number
of labile
hydrogen(s)
726.3460
706.3179
682.3561
555.2522
535.2304
511.2644
491.2270
431.2131
387.2185
367.1770
348.1622
315.1950
5
3
5
4
2
4
2
5
5
2
1
4
297.1459
269.1510
251.1641
197.0759
* Observed only during MS study (Table 2), hence data other than molecular formulae were not available.
MS stage
Precursor
ion(s)*
721
703
677
606
551
426
296
533
507
408
382
e
268
f
268
489
365
MS
MS
MS
MS
Product ion(s)*
703, 677, 606, 551, 533, 507, 489,
#
#
#
426, 408, 382, 365 , 347 , 311 ,
#
296, 268, 250
533, 489
#
#
#
507, 489, 392, 382, 365 , 285 , 250
#
#
#
311 , 296 , 268
#
533, 507, 489, 408 , 347, 311, 250
e
408, 382, 365, 347, 311, 268 , 250
f
268
#
#
489, 347 , 250
#
#
#
#
489, 392 , 347 , 311 , 250
#
#
347 , 250
#
#
#
365, 347 , 268 , 250
#
250
#
#
197 , 171
#
#
347 , 250
#
#
347 , 250
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
455
pathway m/z 533 489 347, 250, same as Route 1. Along with the
ion of m/z 533, other fragments generated parallely from m/z 551
were of m/z 507, 408, 392, and 311. Of these, the ion of m/z 507
S. Jhajra et al.
Figure 3. Proposed mass fragmentation prole of ritonavir in ESI positive ionization mode.
lntens.
M4
5000
4000
3000
M6
M1
2000
M2
M3
1000
M5
0
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46 Time [min]
456
Figure 4. TIC of ritonavir metabolites after incubation with rCYP3A4. The metabolites were identied based on difference in peaks from the matrix
chromatogram, which is also shown in the gure in red.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
The Q-TOF line spectrum of this metabolite is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. Its HRMS and MSn fragmentation data are listed
in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. This metabolite had a molecular
ion of m/z 582.2816, with the difference of 139.0368 Da from
the parent drug corresponding to C7H9NS, which indicated loss
from Part C of the drug. This was supported by the appearance
of the ion of m/z 426 (Route 4) and also by the lack of the
fragment of m/z 296 (Route 6), which originated from Part A
and B, and C, respectively in the case of the drug. The MS3 and
MS4 fragmentation analysis of another major fragment of m/z
525, which resulted from [M + H]+ after loss of C2H3NO, also
revealed that the metabolism involved Part C of the drug. The
difference of 99 Da between m/z 525 and 426 corresponded to
2-amino-3-methylbutanal, a partial motif of Part C, further conrming
that the site of metabolism was Part C only. The postulated fragmentation pattern of the metabolite is shown in Fig. 6.
Just like the parent drug, the loss of CO2 in this metabolite was
also observed in the sequences: m/z 525481 and m/z 426382
(shown in Fig. 6). These ions of m/z 525 and 426 did not have any
free caboxlic group.
Metabolite M3
This metabolite had an accurate mass of m/z 723.2901 (Table 3),
with the difference of 1.9717 Da from the parent drug
(m/z 721.3184). The possibility of the removal of two hydrogen
atoms was eliminated, as that would have meant a difference
of 2.0156 Da, almost 43.9 mDa away from the observed value.
Thus an alternate possibility was considered, which involved
demethylation followed by hydroxylation, or vice versa. The only
facile site for demethylation existed in Part C of the structure of
drug. The same was supported by HRMS (Table 3) and MSn
fragmentation data (Table 4), wherein all the fragments
containing Part C also had the same mass difference of
~1.9717 Da. For example, the line of m/z 296 (Route 6) seen in
the drug was replaced in the spectrum of the metabolite by line
of m/z 298, highlighting the involvement of hydroxylation and
demethylation. Due to this reason only, the fragment of m/z
298 showed a facile loss of H2O to generate a product ion of
m/z 280. On other hand, the ion of m/z 426 (Route 4) that
originated from Parts A and B remained same as the drug. The
structure and fragmentation pathway of this metabolite are
shown in Fig. 7.
Again, similar to the parent drug, this metabolite also showed
loss of CO2, which happened during conversion of ion of m/z 426
to product of m/z 382 (shown in Fig. 7).
Metabolite M4
The accurate mass difference of metabolite M4 against the drug
was 15.9922 Da (~16 Da), which pointed towards its generation
upon metabolic oxidation or hydroxylation of the drug. The Q-TOF
line spectrum of this metabolite is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2.
The corresponding HRMS and MSn data are listed in Tables 3 and
4, respectively. The [M + H]+ of the metabolite fragmented to give
ions of m/z 426 and 312, as compared to m/z 426 and 296 (Route
6) in the case of the drug (Fig. 3). The ion of m/z 426 (Route 4) in
the metabolite had a fragmentation pattern similar to that observed
in the drug, revealing no metabolic changes in Parts A and B. The
appearance of an ion of m/z 312, with a mass of 16 Da higher than
the characteristic ion of m/z 296 in the drug, clearly indicated that
Part C of the drug was involved in the oxygenation process.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
457
Metabolite M2
458
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
M4
M3*
M2
M1
Meta-bolite
[M + H]
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
h
i
+
[M + H]
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
+
[M + H]
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
+
[M + H]
a
b
c
d
e
Line No.
580.3307
463.2680
410.2438
392.2273
375.2089
347.2138
296.1397
285.1928
268.1527
268.1527
250.1611
582.2816
525.2553
507.2478
481.2506
463.2543
426.1866
408.1709
382.1847
365.1572
347.1428
311.1678
285.1851
268.1664
250.1611
723.2901
525.2553
507.2478
426.1867
311.1790
298.1117
280.1203
250.1510
737.3106
719.2957
551.2352
533.2241
507.2478
426.1857
MS/TOF data
+
C32H46N5O3S
+
C27H35N4O3
+
C24H32N3O3
+
C24H30N3O2
+
C24H27N2O2
+
C23H27N2O
+
C14H22N3O2S
+
C18H25N2O
+
C18H22NO
+
C13H22N3OS
+
C18H20N
+
C30H40N5O5S
+
C28H37N4O4S
+
C28H35N4O3S
+
C27H37N4O2S
+
C27H35N4OS
+
C23H28N3O3S
+
C23H26N3O2S
+
C22H28N3OS
+
C22H25N2OS
+
C22H23N2S
+
C19H23N2O2
+
C18H25N2O
+
C18H22NO
+
C18H20N
+
C36H47N6O6S2
+
C28H37N4O4S
+
C28H35N4O3S
+
C23H28N3O3S
+
C19H23N2O2
+
C13H20N3O3S
+
C13H18N3O2S
+
C18H20N
+
C37H49N6O6S2
+
C37H47N6O5S2
+
C29H35N4O5S
+
C29H33N4O4S
+
C28H35N4O3S
+
C23H28N3O3S
580.3316
463.2704
410.2438
392.2333
375.2067
347.2118
296.1427
285.1961
268.1696
268.1478
250.1590
582.2745
525.2530
507.2424
481.2632
463.2526
426.1846
408.1740
382.1948
365.1682
347.1576
311.1754
285.1961
268.1696
250.1590
723.2993
525.2530
507.2424
426.1846
311.1754
298.1220
280.1114
250.1590
737.3150
719.3044
551.2323
533.2217
507.2424
426.1846
Error in mmu
12.5
12.5
10.5
11.5
12.5
11.5
5.5
7.5
8.5
4.5
9.5
13.5
12.5
13.5
11.5
12.5
11.5
12.5
10.5
11.5
12.5
9.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
16.5
12.5
13.5
11.5
9.5
5.5
6.5
9.5
16.5
17.5
14.5
15.5
13.5
11.5
RDB
[CH2]
+[O]
+[O],
[C7H9NS]
[C5H3NO2S]
Metabolic change
S. Jhajra et al.
f
g
h
i
j
+
[M + H]
a
b
c
+
[M + H]
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
Line No.
382.1848
312.1349
294.1275
284.1394
250.1610
737.3057
442.1728
296.1387
268.1463
707.3042
525.2550
507.2477
481.2662
426.1865
382.1970
365.1571
311.1677
282.1271
268.1559
250.1610
MS/TOF data
C22H28N3OS
+
C14H22N3O3S
+
C14H20N3O2S
+
C13H22N3O2S
+
C18H20N
+
C37H49N6O6S2
+
C23H28N3O4S
+
C28H35N4O3S
+
C13H22N3OS
+
C36H47N6O5S2
+
C28H37N4O4S
+
C28H35N4O3S
+
C27H37N4O2S
+
C23H28N3O3S
+
C22H28N3OS
+
C22H25N2OS
+
C19H23N2O2
+
C13H20N3O2S
+
C18H22NO
+
C18H20N
10.0
2.7
0.4
3.3
2.0
9.2
6.7
4.0
1.5
0.2
2.0
5.3
3.0
2.0
2.2
11.0
7.7
0.0
13.7
2.0
Error in mmu
* These metabolites were conrmed to be second generation based on HR-MS data; all other metabolites were rst generation products.
indicates addition, while ( ) indicates loss of the respective moieties and mass. Unpredicted represents more than one metabolic changes.
M6
459
M5
Meta-bolite
Table 3. (Continued)
10.5
5.5
6.5
4.5
9.5
16.5
11.5
5.5
4.5
16.5
12.5
13.5
11.5
11.5
10.5
11.5
9.5
5.5
8.5
9.5
RDB
[CH2]
+[O]
Metabolic change
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
S. Jhajra et al.
n
MS : precursor
ion(s)*
2
M1
MS : 580
M2
MS : 410
3
MS : 296
3
MS : 285
4
MS : 392
4
a
MS : 268
4
b
MS : 268
2
MS : 582
M4
MS : 525
3
MS : 426
4
MS : 507
4
MS : 481
4
MS : 382
4
c
MS : 311
4
MS : 285
4
MS : 268
2
MS : 723
3
MS : 525
3
MS : 426
3
MS : 298
4
MS : 311
2
MS : 737
3
M5
MS :
3
MS :
3
MS :
4
MS :
2
MS :
551
426
312
533
737
567
523
442
296
268
707
525
426
282
M3
M6
MS :
3
MS :
3
MS :
3
MS :
4
MS :
2
MS :
3
MS :
3
MS :
3
MS :
Product ion(s)*
#
460
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
Figure 5. Proposed mass fragmentation pattern of metabolite M1 of ritonavir in ESI positive ionization mode.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
461
S. Jhajra et al.
462
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
Figure 7. Proposed mass fragmentation pattern of metabolite M3 in ESI positive ionization mode.
463
Figure 8. Proposed mass fragmentation pattern of metabolite M4 in ESI positive ionization mode.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
S. Jhajra et al.
Figure 9. Proposed mass fragmentation pattern of metabolite M5 in ESI positive ionization mode.
464
Figure 10. Proposed mass fragmentation pattern of metabolite M6 in ESI positive ionization mode.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
Figure 11. Plausible reaction pathways for the loss of CO2 through the rearrangement (pathway A) and ionneutral mechanism (pathway B). The 3D
optimized geometries for whole reaction pathway are given in Supplementary Figs. 45. All values are in kcal/mol.
TS2
TS1
TS4
TS3
Figure 12. 3D optimized geometries of transition states involved in reaction pathways A and B. Dashed lines represents bond distances in unit.
(Pathway B)
(Pathway A)
80
70
Energy (kcal/mol)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
+
Figure 13. Potential energy surface for the reaction pathways A and B involving the loss of CO2 from the precursor ion. Energy of I1 in closed con+
formation was taken under consideration. The energies are in kcal/mol relative to the precursor ion (PI1 ).
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
465
S. Jhajra et al.
Summary
Figure 14. Model structures used for analysis of differential fragmentation behaviour of ritonavir and its metabolites by using DFT.
Table 5. Relative energy (RE) and proton afnity (PA) values (kcal/mol)
of different ions calculated using B3LYP/6-31 + g(d) level of theory
RE
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
14a-N29
+
14a-N31
+
14b-N29
+
14b-N31
PA
Gas
phase
Solvent
phase*
Gas
phase
Solvent
phase*
0.57
0.00
0.00
10.68
9.68
0.00
0.00
7.83
220.83
221.45
220.53
209.68
242.75
252.47
251.04
243.27
466
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms
The present study provides extensive biotransformation-related information on ritonavir, along with extensive mass fragmentation
pathways of the drug and its all six CYP3A4 generated metabolites.
The metabolites formed were deacylated ritonavir (M1), N-dealkylated
ritonavir (M2), N-demethylated C-hydroxylated ritonavir (M3),
C-hydroxylated ritonavir (M4 and M5) and N-demethylated ritonavir
(M6) of which two were new. The unusual CO2 loss during mass fragmentation of ritonavir was analyzed for possibility of rearrangement
as well as ion-neutral complex mechanism through DFT. Although
the initial step for protonation appeared to favour pathway A
(rearrangement mechanism), favourable activation barriers found on
the reaction pathway of ionneutral mechanism suggest that this
pathway is credible for CO2 loss, as justied by DFT. In addition, the
difference in fragmentation pathways of ritonavir and its metabolites
(M1 to M6) could be ascribed to difference in the proton afnity
values on N29 and N31 centres, again justied by DFT modelling.
Acknowledgements
Authors want to acknowledge Bristol Myers Squibb, Bangalore,
India for providing fellowship and nancial assistance to one of
the authors (Shalu Jhajra). Authors also acknowledge Ninad
Varkhede (Biocon-Bristol Myers Squibb Research Center (BBRC,
Bangalore)), Ravi Shah (BBRC, Bangalore) and reviewers of this
manuscript for their valuable suggestions.
References
[1] B. Prasad, S. Singh. Identication of rat urinary metabolites of rifabutin
n
using LCMS and LCHR-MS. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 41, 173.
[2] B. Prasad, A. Garg, H. Takwani, S. Singh. Metabolite identication by
liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.
2011, 30, 360.
[3] B. Prasad, S. Singh. In vitro and in vivo investigation of metabolic fate
of rifampicin using an optimized sample preparation approach and
modern tools of liquid chromatographymass spectrometry.
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2009, 50, 475.
[4] H.-l. Lin, J. DAgostino, C. Kenaan, D. Calinski, P. F. Hollenberg. The effect of ritonavir on human CYP2B6 catalytic activity: Heme modication contributes to the mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2B6
and CYP3A4 by ritonavir. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2013, 41, 1813.
[5] R. G. Parr, W. Yang. Density-functional theory, Oxford university
press: New York, 1989.
[6] A. D. Becke. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact
exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
[7] C. Lee, W. Yang, R. G. Parr. Development of the Colle-Salvetti
correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electrondensity. Phys. Rev. B. 1988, 37, 785.
[8] M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R.
Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H.
Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino,
G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda,
J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai,
T. Vreven, J. A. Montgomery Jr., J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark,
J. J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N. Staroverov, R. Kobayashi,
J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar,
J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J. M. Millam, M. Klene, J. E. Knox,
J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann,
O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, R. L. Martin,
K. Morokuma, V. G. Zakrzewski, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg,
S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, . Farkas, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz,
J. Cioslowski, D. J. Fox. Gaussian 09: EM64L-G09RevB.01, Gaussian Inc.:
Wallingford CT, 2010.
[9] A. P. Scott, L. Radom. Harmonic vibrational frequencies: An evaluation of Hartree-Fock, Mller-Plesset, quadratic conguration interaction, density functional theory, and semiempirical scale factors.
J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502.
Supporting information
Additional supporting information may be found in the online
version of this article at the publishers web site.
467
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms