08/03/2014

Perkenalan
Tonang Dwi Ardyanto

Mengapa Harus
Menulis?
Tonang Dwi Ardyanto

Boyolali, 7 Mei 1974

SD Negeri Pranggong (1987)
SMP 2 Surakarta (1990)
SMA 1 Surakarta (1993)
Dokter FK UNS (27/12/1999)
Tottori University Japan (1/9/2006)
SpPK FK UNS (18 Mei 2011)
Satu istri dan tiga anak
Diplomat, Dokter Spesialis Patologi
Klinik, Dosen, Insya Allah Aktivis
Dakwah
08 Maret 2014 - 2

08/03/2014

Manusia dikaruniai akal

Berpikir
Ingin tahu
Terus ingin tahu

Ingin membagi

Komunitas Akademik
Bercermin, mengukur kompetensi diri
Membangun pondasi pengetahuan yang
kukuh
Berkompetisi dan saling melengkapi
menuju konstruksi ilmu

Nobel Story

Nobel Story

1970:

1985:

Eiji Osawa meramalkan struktur karbon baru

Dilaporkan dalam jurnal berbahasa Jepang

RW Hanson meramalkan yang sama

Tidak dilaporkan

1985:
Harold Kroto , James R. Heath, Sean O'Brien,
Robert Curl, dan Richard Smalley mewujudkan
karbon ramalan itu menjadi C 60
Mendapat Nobel tahun 1996

Keichi Tanaka melakukan kesalahan tetapi

memunculkan temuan baru Spektrometer
Dilaporkan dalam 1 jurnal dan 1 konferensi
internasional

2002:
Ada ilmuwan Inggris yang laporan jauh lebih
banyak, tetapi laporan pertama dari Tanaka
Nobel 2002

08/03/2014

The scope of medical writing

Behave ethically

Internal reports

Research ethics declaration of Helsinki, ICH

Regulatory reports

Publication ethics

Conference presentations
abstract
oral presentation
poster
Journal articles
original research paper
review article
case report
letter to editor

Misconduct
Fabrication: making up data or results and recording or reporting
them
Falsification: manipulating research materials, equipment, or
processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the
research is not accurately represented in the research record
Plagiarism: the appropriation of another person's ideas,
processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit

avoid misconduct
protect patients identities
report clearly:
informed consent
any deviation from usual practice
full burden imposed on participants
total risks posed to participants or others
benefits to participants, patients, society

The Seven Deadly Sins

Publish and perish
1. Data manipulation, falsification
2. Duplicate manuscripts
3. Redundant publication
4. Plagiarism
5. Author conflicts of interest
6. Animal use concerns
7. Humans use concerns

Protect patients confidentiality

Clear writing

Beware identifiers:

Keep it simple: use short, familiar words

age, sex, location

Avoid jargon and acronyms

clinical details, test results

Be specific

unusual personal story or

context

Be concrete, not abstract

Say what you mean and mean what you say

photo (even if of a body

part or clinical image)

08/03/2014

The message

What makes a good

research question?

For original research:

FINER criteria
Introduction: why ask this research question?
Methods: what did I do?
Results: what did I find?
and
Discussion: what might it mean?

Feasible (answerable with a robust method)

Interesting
Novel
Ethical
Relevant

Mengapa harus publikasi?

Pijakan ke langkah selanjutnya
Bercermin ke orang lain (bench-mark)
Publish or Perish

5 most important criterias to

accept for publication
The importance, timelines, relevance and
prevalence of problem addressed
The quality of writing style (well written, clear,
straight-forward, easy to follow, and logical)
The study design applied (appropriate, rigorous
adn comprehensive)
The degree to which the literature review as
thoughtfull, focused and up-to-date
The use of sufficiently large sample
(Hoogenboom and Manske, How to Write a Scientific Article, 2012)

5 top reasons for rejecting

manuscripts
Inappropriate, incomplete or insufficiently
described statistics,
Over-interpretation of results
Use of inappropriate, sub-optimal or
insufficiently described populations or
instruments
Small or biased sampels
Text that is poorly written or difficult to follow

(Hoogenboom and Manske, How to Write a Scientific Article, 2012)

08/03/2014

Author versus Reader Behaviour

Author behaviour
Want to publish more
Peer review essential
Other journal functions
crucial
Wider dissemination

Reader behaviour
Want integrated system
Browsing is crucial
Quality information
important
Want to read less

Elsevier study of 36,000 authors (1999-2002) presented by Michael Mabe at

ALPSP Seminar on Learning from users 2003; www.alpsp.org

Nasehat Bijak
Ikatlah Ilmu dengan Menuliskannya
(Ali bin Abi Thalib)

Nasehat Bijak
You are what you write .... You are how you
write....:
Tata bahasa
Logika bahasa
Rasa bahasa

08/03/2014

Jangan
Takut
Menulis