QUESTION 1 PART A
UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN
Markers Comments:
Students still did fairly well in the section. It is worrying that students could get the Predetermined
overhead rate correct, but then did not know how to apply that PREDETERMINED OVERHEAD RATE
(POHR) to the jobs worked on during the year. The application of overheads is recognised by the
following general journal entry: Dr Work in process and Cr Manufacturing overhead (with the
Overhead Applied = POHR X ACTIVITY BASE (direct labour cost) = 150 % of direct labour cost x R4
000 000 = R6 000 000 overheads applied during the year). This led to students not getting the
correct over applied overhead of R170 500 (R6 000 000 R5 829 500 (given)) in part 3 fortunately
the error was carried forward from 2 to 3, 4 and 5. Students failed to balance general ledger
accounts correctly many lost mark here. Students confused with the gross profit mark up on cost
and the gross margin on selling price. Please revise your Financial Accounting 1A notes with regard
to the mark up.
DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING
ACC2022F MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING 1
Class Test 1 24 March 2011
1.
SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
Should you wish to appeal against the making of your test script please complete the appeal
form under Resources on Vula and submit this within one week of receiving your test script. The
closing date for appeals on Class Test 1 is 12h00 on Friday 15 April 2011
2.
Work in Process
4 400 000 Finished goods
4 000 000 Closing balance
13 800 000
6 000 000
28 200 000
Opening balance
3 750 000
1
(R2 100 000 + 13 300 000 1 600 000) 2 (4 000 000 x 150 %) CF
Opening balance
Direct labour
Direct material 1
Manufacturing overhead applied 2
3.
24 450 000
3 750 000
28 200 000
R6 000 000
5 829 500
R170 500
4.
Dr
Cr
Manufacturing overhead CF
Cost of goods sold
170 500
170 500
5.
Work in process and finished goods would have been overstated resulting in cost of goods being
overstated and net profit being understated.
Your lecturers
6.
Price of job No. 345
Direct materials
Direct labour: R90 000 x 100/150
Applied manufacturing overhead
Total cost to manufacture
Add: Mark up (R195 000 x 45 %)
Charge customer on invoice
45 000
60 000
90 000
195 000
87 750
R282 750
7.
Direct labour
Manufacturing overhead (R1 200 000 x150%)
Therefore direct materials
R1 200 000
1 800 000
750 000
R3 750 000
OR BATCH METHOD
QUESTION 1 PART B
Markers Comments:
Students failed to show their workings when calculating total variable costs to determine the
contribution margin and the apportionment between the RadBerry (4/5) and JPhones (1/5). Many
students did not recognise the selling and marketing expenses as part of total fixed costs and
students applied the batch method to calculate the breakeven point in units and did not do well in
their attempts (some examples of the correct batch methods are provided below). Any errors were
carried forward especially in the calculation of the revenue part 2. Students did not know the
degree of operating leverage (DOL). Overall students could have prepared better, hopefully they
will for test 2.
1.
Net profit
R4 200 + 12 560 736
16 760 736
X
Break even units
RadBerry:
JPhone:
RadBerry
R1 200
R1 200 x 4 =
R4 800
R1 056 x 4
R4 224
SP x - VC x FC
=
=
=
=
16 336 x 4
Jphone
R2 500
R2 500 x 1 = R2 500
R2 050 x 1 = R2 050
Total
R7 300
6 274
1 026
65 344 units
16 366 units
Selling Price
Less: Variable costs
Direct Materials:
Radio Transmitter
R400
LCD Display
R292
Casing
R204
GPS
Direct Labour (RadBerry R240 x 30/60) (JPhone
R120
R240 x 45/60)
Packaging
R40
Contribution Margin (CM)
R144
(minus 1 if included fixed manufacturing overheads in contribution margin)
JPhone
R2 500
RadBerry
JPhone
65 344 x R1 200 =
78 412 800
16 336 x R2 500 =
40 840 000
R119 252 800
R650
R750
R310
120
R180
R40
R450
Bonus questions:
4.
Steve Jobs
5.
4% and 50% respectively
= 3.99 (or 4)
13,650
R60.00
14,000
R48.00
4.
Abnormal spoilage
- transferred in
- materials
- conversion costs
430 EU x R26.00
430 EU x R48.00
172 EU x R60.00
14,000
R26.00
Conversion
R
n/a
* 819,000
13,650
Materials
R
n/a
672,000
14,000
70
430
2,500
17,000
(3,000)
14,000
5.
Closing Work in Process
- transferred in
- materials
- conversion costs
2,500 EU x R26.00
2,500 EU x R48.00
1,250 EU x R60.00
R134.00
Total
R
282,000
1,855,000
2,137,000
2. Costs and cost per unit
17,000
2,500
Beg. WIP 1 Feb
Transferred in
R
n/a
364,000
100
100
100
100
100
14,000
70
430
2,500
17,000
Completed (given)
Normal loss (0.5% x 14,000 units)
Closing WIP (balancing figure)
3,000
11,000
Beg. WIP(given)
Transf. Making Dept
100
14,000
14,000
70
430
2,500
17,000
100
100
100
100
Materials
%
EU
Transferred in
%
EU
Physical units (January)- FIFO
3,000 Beg. WIP completed
14,000 Started and completed
QUESTION 2 PART A
60
10
0
40
40
50
Conversion
%
EU
14,000
28
172
1,250
15,450
11,180
20,640
10,320
42,140
65,000
120,000
75,000
260,000
Markers comments:
This was a high level question and on the whole this was well answered. Process costing requires a
good methodical approach and where students did not practice the method they got confused. A
common error was to ignore transferred in costs. If you are the second department in a process
you will always have transferred in equivalent units and costs.
QUESTION 2 PART B
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
We would only drop a segment, division, or product if the company overall profit
increased. This would only happen if the fixed cost savings exceeded the lost
contribution margin.
In make or buy decisions we should consider: Variable costs saved; Fixed costs
saved; Additional contribution margin (from another component) we gain by not
producing this component
A special order is profitable as long as incremental revenues exceed incremental
costs of the order.
In a special order decision normal sales and production should cover the
manufacturing costs
When a constraint is a person or a machine its known as a bottleneck
We decide to process further when the incremental revenue exceeds the
incremental processing costs incurred after the split-off point.
Markers comments:
This was straight from the lectures and unfortunately poorly answered. This unfortunately brought
down the average mark for question 2.
6