KRISTEN A. MURRAY
September 2007
Abstract
In humour studies research, there have been few attempts to elucidate why black humour was
such a prevalent, powerful force in late twentieth century culture and why it continues to make a
profound impression in the new millennium. As Dana Polan (1991) laments: Rarely have there
been attempts to offer material, historically specific explanations of particular manifestations of
the comic.1 This thesis offers an interdisciplinary analysis of black humour in the late twentieth
century. I contend that the experience of black humour emerges from the intricacies of human
beliefs and behaviours surrounding death and through the diverse rituals that shape experiences
of loss. I suggest that black humour is an attempt to articulate the tension between the haunting
absence and disturbing presence of death in contemporary society. Chapter 1 of this thesis offers
an historical and etymological perspective on black humour. In Chapter 2, I argue that the
increasing privatisation and medicalisation of death, along with the overt mediatisation of death,
creates a problematic juxtaposition. I contend that these unique social conditions created, and
continue to foster, an ideal environment for the creation and proliferation of black humour. In
Chapters 3 and 4, I examine the structures and functions of black humour through three key
theories of humour: incongruity, catharsis and superiority. Chapter 5 looks at ways in which the
experience of black humour creates resolutions and forces dissonances for people entwined with
loss. In this final chapter, I also consider how black humour may help people make meaning
from issues surrounding death. Throughout this theoretical discussion, I interweave the analysis
of a range of scenes from contemporary black comic texts (i.e. plays, screenplays and television
scripts). On the whole, this thesis works towards a more complex, specific understanding of the
phenomenon of black humour within a social context.
Polan, Dana 1991, The Light Side of Genius: Hitchcocks Mr. and Mrs. Smith in the
Screwball Tradition in Comedy/Cinema/Theory, Andrew Horton (Ed.), University of
California Press, Los Angeles, pp. 131-152.
Acknowledgments
I offer my sincere gratitude to those who have encouraged, inspired, cajoled, rallied and
supported me during the decade it took to complete this thesis. Thank you.
To my mother Gail Murray and grandmother Marjorie Fought, for their unwavering, energetic,
affectionate encouragement.
To my father Patrick Murray and brother Gregory Murray, for their constant, accepting, caring
support.
To my sister Erin Murray, whose severe disabilities and joyous resilience sparked my interest in
black humour.
To my extended family Joe Hawes, Sarah DuVall Murray, Barbara Fought, Chuck Fought Jr.
and Nelson Price, as well as Fran, Laurence, Chris, Catherine and Gabrielle Mulcahy for their
warm, thoughtful interest in my work.
To those who are no longer living but who supported my endeavours: Clara and Woody Murray,
Chuck Fought Sr., Jane Murray and Laura Jones.
To my supervisors John McCallum, Jim Davis, Mira Crouch and Philip Bell for taking an active
interest in this thesis. A special thanks to Mira for her thoughtful, insightful input and to Philip
for his humour and dedication in bringing the project to fruition; I am grateful for your guidance.
To Jessica Milner Davis for her continuous support of my enthusiasm for humour studies.
To my friend Julia Mant, who cheerfully proofread the penultimate draft, provided formatting
resources and offered encouragement over the past several years.
To my friends in Australia and in the United States, who have listened patiently to stories of
academia, expressed genuine interest in my thesis and accepted my periods of hermetic
existence.
To the writers, directors and performers who have made me laugh over the years, in the hopes
that you keep sharing your gift. To the scholars whose work led the way in the field of humour
studies, allowing others of us to develop our fascination with this phenomenon.
To my dear husband and best friend, Nicholas Mulcahy, who enriches my life every day. I adore
you and I could not have finished this thesis without you.
And finally, to the baby who has been with me most of this year and who we will soon welcome
into the world. Thank you for the perspective you bring, little one.*
ii
Dedication
iii
Table of Contents
Page Number
Prologue
Chapter 1
Defining Black Humour
Chapter 2
Depicting Death in a Contemporary Context
42
Chapter 3
86
Collisions, Reversals and Repetitions: Structures in Black Comedy
Chapter 4
144
Contusions, Ruptures and Dislocations: Functions of Black Humour
Chapter 5
198
Resolutions and Dissonances: Making Meaning from Black Humour
Bibliography
228
iv
Conventions
I use Australian standard spelling throughout this thesis, even within quotes from American texts
that use different spelling in the original.
Within the Bibliography, I maintain the original spelling in all aspects of the citations. I have
used consistent capitalisation in the titles of articles, books and other resources.
For citations, I use the Harvard method (2002, 6th edition) with particular reference to the
accepted standards of universities in Australia.
In the body of the text, I use the modern format for referencing (Smith, 2000: 301) and (Smith
2000, Alma 1996) instead of the more formal style (Smith, 2000, p. 301) and (Smith, 2000;
Alma, 1996).
For reprinted and translated texts, I list the year of publication of the edition I referenced in the
thesis, not the original year of publication.
I maintain the punctuation, spelling and format within all excerpts from scripts. When providing
excerpts from plays or screenplays, I refer to the corresponding page number, act or scene in the
published text.
When providing excerpts from films or television programs for which the original screenplay is
not available, I refer to the production itself, from which dialogue has been transcribed. I provide
both the year(s) of cinematic release or television broadcast and the year of DVD release.
I use single quotes to draw attention to, or problematise, the definitions of certain words or
phrases. I generally do not use single quotes on subsequent applications of the same term, except
in the etymological discussion in Chapter 1.
I apply the present tense to the discussion of texts from all time periods, regardless of whether
the writer is living or deceased. (I take this approach because the past tense reduces flexibility
and gives permanency to particular interpretations.) I do not alter the verb tense within
quotations of any type unless the change is indicated in brackets.
In reference to scholars, I use the surname only. In reference to writers (i.e. playwrights and
screenwriters) of artistic works, I use the first name and surname on the first reference, then
surname only thereafter.
For ease of access, the Endnotes are provided at the conclusion of each chapter.
List of Texts
In this thesis, I analyse a range of texts that I believe exemplify contemporary black comedy.
These works emanate from theatre, film and television in the years 1970 to 2001.
Preface:
Monty Python Graham Chapman et. al.
Chapter 1:
Chapter 2:
M*A*S*H Ring Lardner, Jr.
Pulp Fiction Quentin Tarantino
Chapter 3:
The Lonesome West Martin McDonagh
Fargo Ethan Coen and Joel Coen
Six Feet Under Alan Ball et. al.
Funny Bones Peter Chesholm and Peter Flannery
Three Days of Rain Richard Greenberg
Absent Friends Alan Ayckbourn
Weekend at Bernies Robert Klane
Loot Joe Orton
The Memory of Water Shelagh Stephenson
The Precious Woman Louis Nowra
Weekend at Bernies Robert Klane
Loot Joe Orton
Waking Ned Devine Kirk Jones
Absolutely Fabulous Jennifer Saunders
Groundhog Day Scott Rubin and Harold Ramis
Better Off Dead Savage Steve Holland
Harold and Maude Colin Higgins
Chapter 4:
Crimes of the Heart Beth Henley
Radiance Louis Nowra
The Memory of Water - Shelagh Stephenson
Absurd Person Singular Alan Ayckbourn
W;t Margaret Edson
Angles in America Tony Kushner
Seasons Greetings Alan Ayckbourn
Out of Sight Scott Frank
Raised in Captivity Nicky Silver
Fred Beatrix Christian
The Big Lebowski Ethan Coen
Last Orders Fred Schepisi, from the novel by Graham Swift
vi
vii
Prologue
In a dark comic sketch from Monty Pythons Flying Circus, a bereaved man enters a
funeral home. He inquires about the services of the establishment because his
mother has just passed away. Well, the undertaker says calmly. We can help you.
We deal with stiffs (Chapman et al. 1989). The grieving customer assumes he has
misunderstood, so he asks again if the funeral home staff can assist.
UNDERTAKER:
Well, there are three things we can do with your Mum. We can
bury her, burn her or dump her.
MAN:
Dump her?
UNDERTAKER:
In the Thames.
MAN:
What?
UNDERTAKER:
Oh, did you like her?
MAN:
Yes!
UNDERTAKER:
Oh well, we wont dump her then. What do you think? We can
bury her or burn her.
MAN:
Well, which do you recommend?
UNDERTAKER:
Well, theyre both nasty. If we burn her she gets stuffed in the
flames, crackle, crackle, crackle, which is a bit of a shock if shes
not quite dead, but quick. Then we give you a handful of ashes,
which you can pretend were hers.
MAN:
Oh.
UNDERTAKER:
Or, if we bury her she gets eaten up by lots of weevils and nasty
maggots, which as I said before is a bit of a shock if shes not quite
dead.
MAN:
I see. Well, shes definitely dead...
(Chapman et al., 1989: 42-43)
This scene between a cynical undertaker and a man carrying a corpse begins with a
seemingly predictable conversation in unfortunate, though relatively common,
circumstances. Yet the undertaker speaks in a surprisingly coarse and factual tone,
as though explaining the eradication of house pests. He treats the dead body as an
inconvenience rather than as a sacred remnant of an individual life.
The undertaker demonstrates a crude sense of realism about loss. He also implies
that death is a routine event, and that it is unnecessary to use euphemisms for it or
hide its repulsiveness. In Monty Pythons unconventional funeral home, grief is
absent and the corpse is a disposable object. The undertaker seems to minimise
death; he reduces its physical importance and emotional weight.
As the scene continues, the undertaker again behaves in a highly unorthodox manner
when he peers at the dead body in the sack and shouts to his assistant, Fred, I think
we have an eater!. The undertaker then suggests they roast the corpse with a few
French fries, broccoli [and] horseradish sauce. This grotesque menu obviously
contravenes the limits of acceptable behaviour surrounding death. The undertakers
transgressive acts contribute not only to the humour within the scene, but also to the
potential offensiveness of it.1 This scene demonstrates how black comedy engages
with social mores related to the end of life. The humour stems from the undertakers
apparent disregard for propriety. Although he seems rude, he is also truthful. (In
reality, there are only a few things one can do with a dead body: bury, burn or dump
it.) In this sense, the undertakers words are both incongruous and logical in relation
to his profession; he is simultaneously pitiless and pragmatic.
As an archetypal example of black comedy, the Monty Python funeral home sketch
raises intriguing questions about contemporary perceptions of death. Does a comic
perspective on death improve, encumber or merely distract from our ability to
grieve? Does comedy about death denigrate those who are dying and bereaved? Or,
does it serve as a robust reminder of our inevitable demise? This scene indicates
how people living in a particular time and place articulate, as well as repress, their
reactions to death.
Because death and bereavement are some of the most emotionally and intellectually
resonant experiences human beings encounter, the potential for comedy surrounding
these experiences may be both diminished and enhanced, depending upon the
perceptions of the individuals involved. Some people feel it is inappropriate to
engage with comedy about death, while others view it as an opportunity to release
tension and relieve the burden of grief. In some instances, black humour suggests
that death is unconscionably terrifying; at other times, it implies that death is
satisfyingly tranquil. Black humour challenges assumptions; it taunts and confronts,
provokes and prevaricates. Yet what makes black comedy funny? Why has it been
so popular in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries? How does the
experience of black humour affect those who engage with it? These questions
underpin this thesis and lead into an examination of humour in general, before
returning to the particular experience of black humour.
Prologue Endnotes
1
The Monty Python team believed this sketch would be censored by the British Broadcasting
Corporation in the early 1970s, so they added booing and other verbal criticisms to the audio track.
The end of the scene calls for actors, posing as members of the studio audience, to rush onto the set
and physically attack the characters. By depicting the limits of black humour within the sketch, the
Monty Python team identified and challenged social boundaries. Their staged self-censorship was
effective; the sketch went to air (Chapman et al. 1989).
The experience of humour seems to emerge from the intricacies of human beliefs
and behaviours and through the diverse institutions, governments, languages and
rituals that people create. Boskin contends that as a cultural index, a reflector of
social change and conflict, humour provides an unusual historical ray into the
complex connection between societys concerns and issues (1997a: 17).
Similarly, Koziski argues that the analysis of humour can provide insights into
the unstated ideas of a society ideas that may not otherwise be visible (1997:
87). In this thesis, I examine links between the experience of black humour and
the social conditions of the late twentieth century. I also investigate ideas about
the structures and functions of black humour. Throughout these discussions, I
interweave analysis of a range of scenes from contemporary black comic plays,
screenplays and scripts. On the whole, this thesis works towards a more
complex, specific and inclusive understanding of black humour within a social
context. To begin, I consider the nature of humour studies research and explain
the interdisciplinary perspective of this thesis.
Another paradoxical aspect of humour and one that undermines the goals of
any humour studies project is that attempts to understand the experience may
minimise the enjoyment of it. Levin writes that inherent in [humours]
pleasurable quality is a tendency to ward off serious treatment, to fight shy of
interpretation, and consequently to defy analysis (1972: 1). Bergson echoes this
point, saying that we shall not aim at imprisoning the comic spirit within a
definition (1956: 61). Since humour is a pleasing and transient encounter, some
people are reluctant to apply the same assiduous inspection used for other
individual and social phenomena. As E. B. White said, Humour can be
dissected as a frog can, but the thing dies in the process and the innards are
discouraging to any but the pure scientific mind (1977: 303).
points out, there is a historical bias against a close and serious consideration of
comedy (1991: 2). Palmer also cites the established paradox [of] taking
humour seriously (1994: 1). The view that humour defies analysis presumes
that it is fragile and vulnerable to scrutiny. Admittedly, the experience of
humour is intricate and elusive. As a result, the research challenges in this field
are numerous, including the isolation of particular aspects of the experience, the
measurement of intensity of the experience and the comparison of different
interpretations of comedy. What exactly is funny about a joke told at a funeral
wake? Is it the cleverness of the verbalisation, the relationship of the comic
material to the circumstances, the opportunity to escape from a sombre mood or
the alcohol that may be consumed? Any or all of these factors contribute to the
perception, or failure, of humour in this situation.
psychology,
sociology,
philosophy,
anthropology,
linguistics,
medicine, public policy, media studies, management and the performing arts.
Until the last decades of the twentieth century, researchers from different
academic disciplines tended to investigate humour according to the established
methodologies of their respective fields (Davis 2003). In general, philosophers
explored broad questions about the nature of the phenomenon, while social
scientists concentrated upon individual and cultural interactions involving
humour. Biologists were concerned with physiological responses to humour.
Literature and theatre scholars wrestled with the concept of comedy and its
manifestation in novels, stories and plays. The results of these various research
projects were, for the most part, disseminated solely within each respective
discipline. This relative insularity meant that scholars were not always aware of
projects undertaken by colleagues in other fields (Palmer 1994, Davis 2003).
However, the past quarter century of humour research has provided an extensive
collection of influential theories, statistical data and compelling textual analyses
across and between different disciplines. Currently, humour studies researchers
operate from a variety of perspectives, yet integrate findings in a combined
format.2 Interdisciplinary research has become an influential strategy in humour
studies, with scholars drawing upon shared concepts, models and metaphors.
Since the phenomenon of black humour is entwined with death, this thesis also
incorporates research from the field of thanatology. As in the field of humour
studies, the past twenty to thirty years have been pivotal for interdisciplinary
research into death, dying and bereavement. These years have seen remarkable
developments in intervention programs associated with loss, such as palliative
care and grief therapy (Rumbold 2000, Jalland 2006). Social scientists, health
service professionals, philosophers, ethicists and other scholars currently work to
articulate diverse and difficult issues surrounding death. Although it is not
possible to do justice to this entire body of work within this thesis, I draw upon
aspects of this research in my analysis of black humour.
highlight different styles and approaches in black comic writing and to enhance
the theoretical discussion in this thesis. The analysis of black comic texts is also
intended to illuminate each text on its own and create links between similar
texts. The scenes included in this thesis depict potent symbols of death (e.g.
corpses, caskets, hospitals, morgues and ashes) as well as rituals associated with
loss (e.g. funerals, burials, wakes). These texts also reveal the diverse ways in
which people respond to grief.
10
This section, and the one to follow, articulate the boundaries of this thesis. To
contain the scope of the project, I limit my analysis to texts that emanate from
the predominantly English-speaking, Western countries of Australia, the United
States, the United Kingdom and Ireland.4 I recognise that the populations of all
four countries are very diverse and that each individual within these populations
may identify with diffuse and overlapping social groups.
In addition, the timeframe of this project is defined as the late twentieth century.
Thus, the comic material I analyse originates in the years 1970 to 2001.5 By
focussing on this period, I am able to examine the nature and influence of black
comedy in theatre, film and television at a time when this form of expression
became extremely popular and prevalent. I am aware that in focusing my
analysis on the last third of the twentieth century, in the countries noted above, I
imply that a significant shift in perception occurred in these regions from the late
1960s onward. As Denzin cautions, attempts at periodisation give the
impression that any historical moment is a massive homogeneity, bounded on
each side by distinct historical markers (1991: 3). Yet the events of the mid
twentieth century, and in particular World War II and its aftermath, had a
profound effect on comedy in the decades that followed. Boskin says that the
comedy of the immediate post-World War II decades expressed as black,
sick and cruel illustrates the complexities by which humour responds to
swift and unsettling changes in society (1997c: 187). He also notes the
relevance of the study of humour in a particular time and place.
11
death in the late twentieth century, across the four countries considered in this
thesis, I do not suggest that these social conditions affect every individual in the
same ways.
In this research, I employ the word society and other collective terms. In doing
so, I recognise that terminology is always in flux; I am particularly aware of the
controversial nature of words that reflect shared experiences. I employ this
terminology not to condense or conceal differences between individuals and
groups, but to reflect the fact that people living in a particular location share
certain aspects of their existence. They have in common a physical landscape
(although it may be extremely diverse across and within various regions), a
government, a tax system, a transport system, an educational system, several
forms of media, usually a language and other elements of social, cultural and
political life. As Kellehear points out:
This thesis draws on texts from each of these four countries noted above,
although the origins of the works are not the focus of my research. I do not
identify or analyse the national origins of the texts I cite, nor do I presume the
work is valued equally by all residents of the region/country in which it was
created.6 The thesis does not attempt to describe the myriad of different cultural,
12
political, gender, sexual and religious issues of all individuals within the
countries covered by this analysis. Within these four countries, people tend to
relocate and travel more often than in previous generations and they have greater
access to data about other regions and countries. Due to these factors, cultural
products such as comic texts are increasingly widely distributed within and
between these countries. In this thesis, therefore, I investigate what appear to be
shared, recognisable experiences of death and grief as well as the expression of
these experiences through contemporary comic writing.
Throughout this thesis, I work with a wide range of contemporary comic texts,
from the realistic to the fantastical. I discuss characters who are highly articulate
and those who are lost for words. I cite scenes about terminal illness, funerals,
burials, wakes and the process of grieving. As noted, this project strives to
clarify the boundaries of black comedy, analyse a representative selection of
contemporary texts and suggest reasons for the power and relevance of black
humour in the late twentieth century.
13
is forced to apply both terms in phrases like an article about humour and
comedy (1994: 2). Yet he is aware of the problematic nature of these
definitions, stating that the distinction is far from watertight (1994: 7).
The uncertainty Palmer articulates is echoed by other scholars in the field. Davis
also recognises the challenges involved in describing humour. She cautions that
the field of humour studies [is] still in its evolutionary phase regarding
terminology, yet she believes it is important to demarcate the key concepts in
humour studies research (2003: x). Davis uses the term comedy to envelop all
types of written or performed material that may be funny, including farce,
parody, satire, black comedy and other styles. She uses the term humour to
cover the origins and effects of laughter. Humour is the general rubric under
which scholars from all disciplines unite their efforts in this field of inquiry
(ibid.).
For the purposes of this research, I make a different distinction between the two
terms. I use the term comedy to refer to an interaction or communication that
may be deemed funny. Comedy can consist of jokes, stories, images, physical
events and texts. The subject matter of comedy may be as wide-ranging as the
style of presentation, which may be verbal, nonverbal, visual or a combination of
these forms. Comedy may elicit familiar responses such as smiling and laughing,
but these effects are not the same as comedy itself; they relate to the overarching
experience of humour. In this thesis, I use the term humour to describe the
experience of perceiving and appreciating an entity as funny. Humour
encompasses the psychological, social and cultural factors related to getting a
joke, as well as the emotional and physiological effects of reacting to it. In light
of these definitions of comedy and humour, I use the term black humour to
refer to the experience, however transient, through which individuals find death
and bereavement funny. I use the term black comedy to describe the complex
set of interactions and communications, including texts, which may give rise to
the experience of black humour. (In practice, black comedy and black humour
14
are intertwined. However, I make the above distinction to increase clarity in the
analysis that follows.)
Differentiating between comedy and humour in this way seems to evoke a social
science model for the phenomenon of humour: comedy serves as a stimulus,
while humour denotes a response. According to proponents of this model,
comedy produces a set of cognitive, emotional and physiological reactions in
individuals who engage with it. In previous decades, the stimulus-response
model was prominent in humour research, especially in work related the notion
of a sense of humour (Chapman and Foot 1977). Yet this application of the
stimulus-response model is not flexible enough for the unpredictability and
variability in the experience of humour. As a result, this model has largely been
superseded by the concept that humour involves a negotiation between
participants (Martin 1998).
This thesis concentrates on written black comedy and does not cover purely
physical black comedy, songs, cartoons or other artwork.7 I also limit the
research to texts concerning the comic treatment of human death, dying and
bereavement. In order to manage the scale of the current project, I do not include
texts related to other experiences such as divorce, disability, dislocation,
discrimination or the loss of material goods or animals. I perceive these
experiences as part of the larger group of subjects that may be recruited into
black comedy. In other words, I recognise the breadth of dark material that may
be made funny, even though I am not including these experiences in this
analysis.
15
The decision to concentrate solely on written black comic texts precludes the
consideration of the many performances based on these texts.8 As discussed
further below, this decision is not intended to minimise the importance of issues
surrounding performance. Rather, this approach is designed to address the key
questions posed in the thesis and to provide shape and focus to the analysis.
The rest of this chapter presents key issues in the study of black humour. First I
offer a short discussion of the reader response theories; this section provides a
background on my approach to the analysis of black comic texts in subsequent
chapters. The two sections thereafter introduce the notion of humour perception
and the three key theories of humour, respectively. The next segment looks at
the etymology of the terms black humour and black comedy. This is followed
by a brief introduction to black comedy in the mid twentieth century the period
just before the timeframe considered in this thesis. The final section of this
chapter sets out the structure for the remaining chapters in the thesis.
The analytical perspective known as reader response theory arose in the late
1960s from a desire to explore and honour the influence of the receiver on the
interpretation of texts. Rather than representing one coherent, unified theory, the
term reader response theory actually consists of a collection of projects, each
of which focus upon different areas of the central concept of the reader as active
interpreter of a text. Some scholars refer to aspects of this work as reception
theory; in addition, there is overlap between the group of reader response
theories and performance theory.
16
17
scripts, the word text suggests both a written document and a production. By
definition, a production involves interpreting or reading a written text. A
production also engenders another evaluative process when an individual or
audience reads the performance. Using a term coined by Marco de Marinis,
Carlson speaks of a spectacle text, or a written text that has been made into a
performance; this distinction creates space for both written and produced works
of art within the term text.9
Bennetts (1990) research applies the principles of the reader response theories
to the analysis of performance. In this performance theory project, Bennett
focuses on challenges and disruptions [to] the codes and conventions which
demand passivity from audiences (1990: 4). Performance theory challenges the
assumption of a passive reader/viewer. This perspective reconfigures the
individual, and the set of individuals that comprise an audience, as essential
participants in the experience of performance. In this sense, Bennett foregrounds
the social construction of performance; she is less concerned with the opinions
of any individual receiver (1990: 184).
18
Kelly applies the specific term personal constructs to the cognitive and
emotional structures that influence peoples thinking and behaviour. He believes
that people erect conceptual frames, then later modify or reinforce them through
subsequent evaluations of their experiences. Through this interactive process,
individuals may change their opinions or confirm their previous beliefs. In
discussing construct theory, Kelly rejects the term subject in favour of the term
participant; he believes this linguistic distinction represents a collaborative
relationship with those involved in research. Throughout the remainder of this
thesis, I employ the term participant to represent the individuals involved in the
19
In general terms, there are three types of participants involved in the experience
of humour: (1) the creators of comic material, (2) the presenters of this material
and (3) the readers of the material.10 These three roles are integral to, and often
overlapping in, the process of forming that which is perceived as funny. In order
to limit the scope of this thesis, I do not concentrate on the first two sets of
participants. As discussed above, neither the creators intention (which cannot
necessarily be elicited, articulated or stabilised), nor the productions of a text,
are the focus of this work.11 Instead, my analysis concentrates upon the readers. I
engage with the texts discussed herein as a reader in an active process of
interpretation.
20
21
Incongruity
Catharsis
Another key theory of humour stems from the notion of catharsis, which has its
origins in the Greek word katharsis meaning to purge or release. Aristotle
(1964a) proposes the catharsis theory in the Poetics, saying that individuals who
engage with drama build up tension regarding the characters and situations
depicted in the text; this tension then dissipates when the dramatic conflict is
resolved. Aristotle writes about catharsis in relation to tragic drama, but he also
applies the theory to comic drama in a treatise called the Coislinian Tractate.13
22
Freud (1960) develops the catharsis theory of humour in Jokes and Their
Relation to the Unconscious, suggesting that participants build up anxiety about
controversial issues within a comic text. He refers to comedy about sensitive
subject matter as tendentious comedy; this includes jokes and stories about
bodily functions (and dysfunctions), sex, money, religion and politics. For
Freud, tendentious comedy also has a purpose: it seeks to provoke discussion, to
challenge beliefs or to titillate. Only jokes that have a purpose run the risk of
meeting with people who do not want to listen to them (Freud, 1976: 132). He
contrasts this style of expression with innocent comedy, which he describes as
inoffensive but not insubstantial. Of these two types, tendentious comedy relates
most closely to the structures, contents and effects of black comedy. Freud
argues that tendentious comedy enables participants to raise challenging issues
in a protected environment. He suggests that people are unconsciously motivated
to experience humour because it alleviates social repression.
In recent decades, scholars have worked with the catharsis theory in a substantial
collection of research projects related to the effects of humour (Moran 1997,
Morrow 1987, Zolten 1992). The concept of catharsis is analysed in greater
depth in Chapter 4, which investigates the possible functions of black humour.
Superiority
23
to laugh at the mistakes and misfortunes of others. Yet in this conception, the
objects of derision are more inept than villainous.
To set the stage for the analysis in subsequent chapters, the following section
presents a brief etymological and historical perspective on black comedy and
black humour. This discussion helps situate this form of expression within the
context of the late twentieth century; it also provides a broader perspective on
my definitions of the terms black comedy and black humour.
In the absence of a specific entry for the combined terms black humour or
black comedy in The Oxford English Dictionary, I consider the interrelated
definitions of the words comedy, humour and black (Simpson 1989).14 The
word comedy comes from the ancient Greek word komoidia, based on the
combination of two Greek terms: komos (revel) and aoidos (singer or minstrel).
Since approximately the sixteenth century, the word comedy has referred to
funny, surprising experiences in everyday life (Simpson, 1989, Vol III: 530).
This meaning of the word suggests informality and a resistance to authority in
24
The word humour stems from the Latin word humor or humere meaning
moisture or fluids. The word originally referred to the concept of different bodily
fluids of a living organism (Simpson, 1989, Vol VII: 485). The Latin root hum
also forms the core of the English words exhume and humility (Simpson,
1989, Vol V: 539, 485). This suggests that the word humour has etymological
connections to the natural life cycle and to the act of grounding ones self in
earthly, realistic matters. Davis argues that the concept of humour contains, at its
core, an awareness of the limitations of physical existence: all human dignity is
at the mercy of the human body and its appetites and needs (2003: 3).
It was not until the seventeenth century that the word humour took on a
meaning associated with comedy and laughter. At this time, the term came to
mean a quality of action, speech, etc. which excites amusement (Simpson,
1989, Vol VII: 486). This definition also includes a reference to a faculty of
perceiving and enjoying what is ludicrous, or of expressing it in speech, writing
or other composition (ibid.). Thus, the concept of humour seems to
encompass various aspects of the natural life cycle.
The literal and figurative meanings of the word black inform the meaning of
the terms black humour and black comedy. The literal meaning of black
stems from the Old English word sweart or swart, which means dark in
colour as well as wicked, malignant (Simpson, 1989, Vol II: 238). The
figurative meaning of black includes a sense of dark or deadly purposes,
malignant; pertaining to or involving death... (Simpson, 1989, Vol II: 239). In
25
the latter part of the sixteenth century, the word became associated with
malevolence. Several decades later, black also came to mean clouded with
sorrow or melancholy; dismal, gloomy, sad (ibid.). This definition suggests a
pessimistic mood and a sense of loss.
It was not until the mid twentieth century that the term black became linked
with both humour and comedy, creating two new terms with contemporary
meanings.15 At this time, the notion of black, or blackness, began to reflect a
sense of the comic and macabre (Simpson 1989, Vol II: 239). The coupling of
black with comedy created an unusual duality: black implied evil, sadness
or loss, while comedy related to justice, celebration and renewal. Thus, the
apparent lack of fit between the words black and comedy now reflects the
inherent incongruity, flexibility and controversy in this form of expression.
As noted previously, descriptive terms related to black humour are not applied
consistently in existing research. A number of terms including tragicomedy,
sick humour and gallows humour are used interchangeably. To address this
ambiguity, I provide below a brief etymological investigation of key terms
related to black comedy and black humour. I then reiterate the way in which
these terms are employed within this thesis.
Because the terms related to black humour arose as labels for particular styles of
expression, it is first relevant to consider these terms in relation to the notion of
genre. Over hundreds of years, the concept of genre has significantly influenced
the way texts are created and perceived, through existing and emerging
definitions of literary and artistic style. In the twentieth century, terms like
tragicomedy and black farce developed as labels for works that did not fit
clearly within previously defined genres. Other terms, such as pastoral
comedy, faded from common usage. This ongoing process of adaptation,
though it extends back to the drama of ancient Greece, has been particularly
evident over the past half century. During this time there have been significant
transformations in the types of texts written for performance. These notable
26
In the latter decades of the twentieth century, scholars challenged the notion of
genre. The idea of formal divisions between styles of expression became less
dominant, even consciously absent, in literary criticism. As conceptual borders
were crossed and new ones constructed, traditional genre terms imparted less
meaning. Currently, some scholars still choose to employ genre names to
describe different styles of expression. Other scholars use genre terms in an
historical context, looking at how texts were received at the time they were
initially created and performed. Writers often use genre labels in either a literal
or ironic manner to provide an indication of the style of work they have
produced.
Contemporary scholars and writers who apply genre labels, particularly terms
related to humour, generally seem to do so with an awareness of the problematic
nature of the concept of genre. Creators and scholars of comic material tend to
recognise, and even exploit, the shifting borders of previous genre definitions.
For example, Davis (2003) asserts that contemporary writers of farce manipulate
the established tenets of that form to reshape it into a multifaceted, postmodern
style of expression. In this manner, the vocabulary related to humour is
continually evolving. Arguably, some contemporary texts resist categorisation
altogether. Feibleman (1964) concedes that traditional genre definitions of
tragedy and comedy may not be useful because some situations contain both
types of experiences.16 Writing in the mid twentieth century, Feibleman signals a
growing awareness of the notion of black humour.
The term tragicomedy is one of the oldest labels connected to the form of
expression now known as black comedy. The term emerged in the latter
sixteenth century to describe works of drama that incorporate elements of both
traditional comedy and tragedy (Simpson 1989). For more than three centuries,
tragicomedy served as the dominant descriptor for written work involving both
27
From the 1960s onward, black comedy became the popular name for the sharp,
cynical humour of the post-war era, whereas tragicomedy came to represent a
simpler, less graphic style of expression. Winston, writing about this shift in
terminology, argues that the nature of tragicomedyis at odds with black
humours violent juxtaposition and combination [of] extremes (1972: 274).
Berger (1998), in a more recent discussion of genre labels, states that the concept
of tragicomedy has evolved to describe a relatively non-contentious form of
writing: one which does not overtly challenge notions of death. Similarly, Cohen
(1997) says that tragicomedy may be differentiated from other forms of
humorous expression by its muted depiction of fear and loss and its comfortable
ending.
Some scholars associate tragicomedy with texts written in the period between
the late sixteenth and mid twentieth centuries. Within this perspective, there
remains a particular focus on tragicomedy from the Renaissance period (Foster
2004). Other scholars view tragicomedy as a modern, even postmodern, style of
writing and therefore connect it with recent texts for performance (Orr 1991).
When the term is used in a contemporary context, it tends to denote writing that
is more affirming than confronting in relation to death. This contrast illustrates a
previous point: that genre terms are continually reconstructed and exist within a
changing, contested space.
28
The term gallows humour developed over a century ago as a label for the witty,
if apocryphal, comments that individuals made prior to their deaths particularly
deaths by execution. This form of comedy was intentional on the part of the
condemned individual; it involved wilful rebellion against the forces of fate. As
noted above and elsewhere in this thesis, I apply the term black comedy to a
wider range of material, including jokes made purposefully or unintentionally by
those experiencing death or observing it (either directly or indirectly).
Freud expresses interest in gallows humour and recounts a joke about a criminal
walking towards the gallows on a Monday morning. Well, the man remarks,
the weeks beginning nicely (1985: 427). According to Freud, gallows humour
is inextricable from the life-threatening situations in which it is created. The
humour stems from the contrast between dire circumstances and superficial
comments about those circumstances.17
Over time, the notion of gallows humour came to refer to a range of ominous
situations, not just those involving death. Today, the term is not as prevalent in
humour research. More than thirty years ago, Esslin (1969) categorised gallows
humour as old-fashioned. He argued that this style of writing was less complex
and dangerous than the black comedy associated with Beckett and other writers
of that period.
Another term associated with black comedy is black farce. Davis (2003) sees
this as a particular type of dark comic writing in which the energy and
experimentalism of farce is combined with situations and information related to
death. Texts labelled as black farce tend to maintain a light, ridiculous tone; they
usually focus less on character development and more on a comic state of affairs.
Breton (1997), as discussed further below, links farce of all types to black
comedy. He believes that farce generally revolves around the threat of death.
Black comedy also shares essential qualities with the grotesque, a form of
literature, art and performance centred on nature and corporeality. The term
29
Bakhtin (1968) sees the grotesque body as the full physical and spiritual
identity of an individual, which encompasses notions of life and death, the
beautiful and the ugly. For Bakhtin, the functions of the body serve as signs of
the ongoing cycle of life and are therefore simultaneously sacred and profane.
He also believes the fallible physical self is an essential element of comedy.
Thus, Bakhtin sees the corpse is a natural part of complete human existence.
Along these lines, Winston identifies the grotesque as a sub-set of black comedy
in which humour arises from damage to the body. This style of writing examines
the ways in which [the body] can be distorted, separated into its component
parts, mutilated and abused (Winston, 1972: 282). The grotesque shares with
black comedy a concern with physical injury, illness, death and corpses.
Similarly, Dundes (1987) links his description of sick humour to comic forms
such as the grotesque, dark humour and gallows humour.
The term satire is also sometimes linked to black comedy. The term stems from
the sixteenth century and generally refers to writing that attempts to convince the
reader to accept a particular viewpoint. Satire employs irony and other devices to
expose vice or to belittle an individual or idea (Simpson 1989). Berger sees
satire as the deliberate use of the comic for purposes of attack (1998: 136). He
believes benevolent satire is an oxymoron (ibid.). In contrast, black comedy
suggests a more open, less directive relationship with participants. Black comedy
usually does not require participants to accept a certain political position before
the humour can succeed; it seems to offer existential possibilities, but does not
focus on persuasion regarding specific issues.
30
Finally, Styan (1968) uses the phrase dark comedy to refer to the incisive,
inventive, even violent writing that emerged in the mid twentieth century. He
contends that this style of expression depicts ambiguity about death in a new and
forceful manner. In dark comedy, the impulse to laugh and the desire to cry are
felt in quick succession, creating an overwhelming emotional effect. Styan also
notes that dark comedy counterpoint[s] the pathetic and the comic within the
same experience by demonstrating their object from more than one angle
(1968: 117). Styan believes dark comedy is an amalgamation of existing genres.
It incorporates diverse approaches and effects, but is primarily concerned with
loss.
For the purposes of this thesis, I have set forth a definition of the terms black
humour and black comedy and have described the boundaries around my
project. However, I am not attempting to establish a permanent or static
definition of these terms. Instead, I take the perspective that genre terms evolve
over time, as does the concept of genre itself. Like any text, this thesis is bound
by the time and location of its creation, as well as current trends in terminology
and theory. I do believe, however, that clear research practice involves the
consistent use of fundamental terms. To this end, I made a distinction between
black comedy and black humour in this chapter and apply that perspective
throughout the thesis. Yet I recognise that the application of these terms may be
31
different for other scholars and writers and that the use of the terms may shift in
the future.
It seems impossible to identify the first text containing black comedy. The desire
to mock death, however expressed, has probably been present in different
cultures for millennia. Centuries before the development of black humour and
black comedy, the impulse to laugh at loss seems to emerge in literature.19
However, this extensive debate regarding the interpretation of texts from
previous centuries in the light of modern sensibilities lies outside the scope of
this thesis. Thus, I begin this introduction to black comic texts in the twentieth
century with the first published use of the term black humour, followed by an
explanation of how I have defined the term within this thesis.
In the latter 1930s, Breton (1997) coined the phrase lhumour noir (black
humour) to describe a dark, surreal style of comic writing that arose during
World War I and developed extensively in the mid twentieth century. In the
years between the wars, Breton collected and analysed literary works that he
believed represented this newly emergent style. Anthologie de lhumour noir
(1997) was published in 1940, just a week before the Nazi invasion of France;
the Vichy government then censored the book and it disappeared. The war
forced Bretons exile in the United States. While overseas, Breton wrote to his
publisher, stressing that the new style of humour he discussed in the anthology
was highly relevant to 1940s Europe. Breton urged his publisher to release the
book in the very period we are living through, [for] I believe that afterward it
would no longer be quite so situated (Polizzotti, 1997: ix). The anthology was
distributed in France in 1945 and finally published in English in 1997.
32
Breton updated the contents of his anthology for a 1966 edition, but died later
that year. In his foreword to this edition, Breton (1997) notes that black comedy
developed extensively in the two decades after the initial publication of his book.
Yet he maintained the belief that black humour was inherently linked to the
period preceding, surrounding and following World War II. In Bretons view,
the years between the wars and a series of significant events including
economic depression, political upheaval and shifting social circumstances
forged a set of conditions that led to the growth and development of this sharp,
unsympathetic form of writing. Black comedy suggests that life is relatively
short, violent and unsatisfying. Nonetheless, much of this material maintains an
energetic, indignant tone. Breton further suggests that black comedy should not
be seen as a genre, but as a perspective a way of understanding the world. He
even personifies black humour, saying that if scholars were able to define it,
imagine the advantage humour would be likely to take of its very definition
(1997: xiv). Attempts to adequately define and contain black humour, Breton
reasons, may be undermined by the rebellious nature of this form of expression.
33
elsewhere, the play received both critical accolades and dismissals when it
premiered. The works non-traditional theatricality (i.e. the absence of a clear
setting, no clear plot, characters who do not undergo change) confused and
angered some participants, while it excited others. The main characters,
Vladimir and Estragon, do not overtly state any of the plays possible
interpretations, nor did Beckett offer explanations at the time of the plays initial
presentation and publication. Waiting for Godot foreshadows Becketts later
work in which he delves further into the futility of life and the disappointments
that originate in human weakness. Becketts work from this period is distinctive
because he captures the emotional and visceral experience of despair in his stage
images and in halting, bitterly funny dialogue (Esslin 1969).
The themes of Waiting for Godot echo the ideas of Camus and Sartre, exponents
of the philosophy of existentialism. Their perspective which seemed urgent,
natural and necessary in the light of two highly destructive wars articulates a
sense of hopelessness and ennui. These three writers, in addition to numerous
others, contribute the body of work known as the Theatre of the Absurd, a
general term for writing associated with the fatalism and cynicism of the mid
twentieth century. The list of playwrights considered central to the Theatre of the
Absurd is subjective, but Cohen (1997) includes Jean Genet, Eugne Ionesco,
Freidrich Duerrenmatt, Harold Pinter and Edward Albee. Esslin (1969) believes
that the Theatre of the Absurd extends beyond the boundaries of comedy or
tragedy to encompass texts that deal with death in a surreal, but not necessarily
funny, manner.
34
Pattie (2000) notes that the Theatre of the Absurd represents more of a
conceptual grouping than a consolidated, focused movement. The texts
considered to fit this descriptor are loosely tied together by a common rejection
of a world run on rational principles (Pattie, 2000: 114). The phrase Theatre of
the Absurd implies adherence to a political or social agenda, but it is also an
expression of emptiness; this style of writing reflects a loss of belief.
The major social movements of the 1950s and 1960s campaigns to enhance the
rights of minority groups, to recognise and respect indigenous people, to
improve working conditions and healthcare, to mainstream disabled individuals
and to integrate education were also forces in shaping the texts of the latter
twentieth century. In conjunction with the significant changes in opinions and
practices wrought by these movements, there was a noticeable shift towards a
more permissive, perhaps pessimistic, style of writing and performance.
The new style of writing that emerged in the mid twentieth century seemed
unfathomable to those who had studied literature and theatre in prior decades.
Writing in the 1960s, Lauter wonders, What critic a hundred years agocould
have anticipated todays sick humour and murderously funny British
comedies? (1964: xxiv). Berger describes this style of writing as a
distinctively modern comic sensibility which is witty, sardonic, very much
detached (1998: 215). Similarly, Horton links the changes in comic writing
from the 1950s onward to an increasingly fragmented sense of the old order
after World War II (1991: 15).
35
Thesis Structure
This thesis is presented in five chapters. The first chapter comprises this
introduction, which lays the groundwork for the analysis to follow. The
following chapter offers a discussion of the social context of black humour in the
late twentieth century. In this analysis, I consider the factors that formed a
unique and fertile environment for the proliferation of black comedy. To better
comprehend the experience of black humour in context, I look at the ways in
which death is sequestered, yet at the same time publicised, in contemporary
society. I suggest that this juxtaposition creates tensions that erupt in black
comedy.
In the next two chapters, I employ the three key theories of humour
incongruity, catharsis and superiority to analyse black comic texts and to
investigate the experience of black humour. More specifically, Chapter 3
examines the structures of black comedy through the incongruity theory of
humour. In particular, I consider the different ways in which elements in a comic
text may be juxtaposed against one another. I express these contrasts through the
metaphors of collisions, reversals and repetitions. Chapter 4 considers the
possible functions of black humour through the catharsis and superiority theories
of humour. More specifically, I reflect on the experience of finding death funny
and how that affects participants beliefs and behaviours surrounding loss. I
present this discussion through the metaphors of contusions, ruptures and
dislocations. In both these chapters, I assemble and analyse a diverse collection
of black comic texts from the late twentieth century.
The final chapter brings together the concepts addressed previously in the thesis.
In particular, I attempt to articulate the interconnectedness of the three theories
of humour and the diverse range of physical tropes that depict the experience of
black humour. As in the other chapters, this discussion incorporates the analysis
36
In short, the impetus for this thesis stems from the dearth of research specifically
focused on black humour. Although there is a small body of extant work in this
area, an examination of this research also reveals omissions. Much of this work
has concentrated solely on jokes (Boskin 1997c, Davies 1982, Dundes 1997,
Morrow 1987) or on the improvised use of black comedy in emergency
situations (Moran 1990, Maeve 1998, Schulman-Green 2003). Currently, there is
no recent English-language anthology of contemporary black comic texts for
performance. In addition, there have been few attempts to elucidate why black
humour was such a prevalent, powerful part of late twentieth century culture and
why it continues to make a major impression in the new millennium. As Polan
laments: Rarely have there been attempts to offer material, historically specific
explanations of particular manifestations of the comic (1991: 140-1). This
thesis seeks to make a contribution within that space through an interdisciplinary
analysis of the phenomenon of black humour in the late twentieth century.
37
Chapter 1 Endnotes
1
The current breadth of humour studies research means that a list of scholars engaged in this
work is too extensive to provide here. However, many of these individuals are referenced in this
thesis. (Please also see endnote 2, below.)
2
Humour studies research is represented in publications devoted to humour in particular
Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research as well as in journals and monographs
from other disciplines such as the arts, social sciences and biological sciences. The field of
humour studies is also the focus of numerous conferences and associations, most notably the
events of the International Society for Humor Studies.
3
I read hundreds of texts before selecting the thirty-six examples in this thesis. I do not suggest
that the thesis contains all the works that may be relevant to the discussion, but it includes what I
believe to be a representative sample of voices in contemporary black comic writing.
4
Although a wide variety of languages are spoken throughout these countries, I write in English
using texts from that language. This choice is not intended to minimise the importance of
creative or critical contributions made in different languages. In addition, the decision to narrow
the scope of the thesis to these four countries does not imply a heightened importance for these
countries or an acceptance of the hegemonic histories of these parts of the world.
5
The scholarly work I employ in working with this comic material stems from a much wider
period (i.e. philosophical writings of Ancient Greece through to social science projects and
literary and film criticism of the early twenty-first century).
6
This thesis does not attempt to identify a sense of humour for a particular region or country.
For research in that area see Ziv (1988) and Davies (1998).
7
My use of the term black comedy does not refer to the writing or performance of comic work
by people of colour. I am highly respectful of other scholars decisions to employ that term to
distinguish the origins of comic material. However, I have chosen not to highlight the race,
gender or other defining qualities of the writers and scholars whose work I investigate in this
thesis.
8
The texts discussed in this thesis have generated a vast number of performances. For example,
Beth Henleys play Crimes of the Heart has been produced thousands of times over the past
twenty years. It is not feasible for this thesis to offer an analysis of these innumerable
performances. Instead, I offer my interpretation of this and other comic texts as written works of
art. Analysing texts in this manner is an established method of research in various fields,
including literary criticism, theatre studies, folklore studies and sociology.
9
Other scholars prefer to use the term pre-text for written plays, screenplays and scripts and the
term text for performances. I do not employ that terminology in this thesis, but instead use the
term text to refer to written works of art.
10
To reiterate, I use the word reader to refer to individuals who engage with comic material
through any of their senses.
11
It is not possible to cover the oeuvre of each writer whose work is included in this thesis, or to
discuss the full range of criticism surrounding the selected texts. As stated, it also not feasible to
consider all productions and performances of these texts.
12
I acknowledge that each individuals level of connection or involvement with the experience
of humour may vary. In addition, the number of people simultaneously engaged in the
experience of humour ranges from one (e.g. a joke created and enjoyed by one person) to
millions (e.g. a production broadcast to a wide audience). This factor affects the perception of
humour, but is linked to issues of presentation and reception, which are not the focus of this
thesis.
13
Not all scholars agree that Aristotle wrote this treatise. However, similarities in focus and style
lead many experts to surmise that the work is his. This debate is not central to this thesis, but I
include the treatise for its significance in understanding the concept of humour in Greece in the
fourth century B.C.E..
14
To date, The Oxford English Dictionary Additions Series (Simpson 1997) contains no
additions or emendations to the words comedy, humour or black.
15
The Macquarie Dictionary offers a definition of the combined term black comedy as a form
of expression characterised by an underlying pessimism or bitternessdealing with a tragic or
gruesome subject (Delbridge et al.,1991: 181). This dictionary also offers a figurative meaning
38
of black as superficially humorous but pursuing an underlying theme related to the darker side
of life (1991: 180). Both these definitions seem overly restrictive; they imply that black comedy
is merely a faade that covers exigent issues associated with death.
16
Feibleman describes a scene from Alice in Wonderland (Carroll 2004) in which Alice
experiences the strange transformation of a baby into a pig, then encounters the bewildering
Cheshire Cat. Feibleman points out that this convoluted scene does not fit easily into one single
literary genre. He says that we may see the actual situation as comedy or as tragedy; for in fact
it is both (1974: 474).
17
Both Critchley (2002) and Colletta (2004) note that Freuds explanation of gallows humour
also involves the efforts of the super-ego to control the id. Freud believes that, in these moments
of humour, the super-ego (i.e. parent figure) refuses to let the id (i.e. child figure) react to the
execution with pure emotion.
18
Winston makes specific reference to Styan as one of several scholars who modifies an existing
genre label to match the new mode of communication now commonly known as black comedy.
19
For example, some contemporary literary critics perceive black humour in particular ancient
Greek tragedies, such as Euripedes Medea (1994). This stems from both the characters
emotional intensity, as well as their callous indifference, in the face of death. For example, when
Medeas servant informs her that she has successfully murdered her ex-husbands new wife, as
well as her own two sons, she says Good news!...How did they die? Was it really so horrible, so
vile? The worse it was, the more I want to hear (1994: 39). McLeish and Raphael describe
moments like this as brutal comedy (1994: x).
Other critics find black humour in Renaissance drama, especially in Christopher Marlowes The
Jew of Malta (1969), which details the vengeful murders of the wealthy, scheming Barabas. This
play is often described as a black comedy because Barabas jokes about his terrible deeds and
finds increasingly clever ways to dispatch his perceived enemies. After devising a complicated
mass murder, he says slyly: Will this not be brave? (1969: 427).
Similar dark comic undertones appear in the anonymous play The Arden of Feversham (1984),
dated from approximately 1592, which details the murder of a prominent merchant at the hands
of his wife Alice and her lover. The play has been attributed to a number of prominent
playwrights of the period including Marlowe, Kyd and Shakespeare but authorship remains
unknown. In this play, Alice and her hired assassins repeatedly fail to kill Arden. They succeed
at the end of the play and are quickly apprehended. Their ineptitude may be perceived as darkly
comic.
Scholars also point to moments of bleak humour in Shakespeare (1982). One of the most
commonly cited examples is the gravediggers scene in Hamlet, in which the clown/gravedigger
gives witty, elusive answers to Hamlets questions. In addition, the Porter at the castle gate in
Macbeth recounts the numerous different professions of people that wind up in hell. In another
dark scene from Richard III, King Richard duplicitously woos Princess Anne, whose husband he
has just killed. The same play contains two dim-witted murderers who bicker about how they
should execute George, Duke of Clarence. In Titus Andronicus, General Titus laughs out loud
when he discovers that his sons have been murdered. Titus enemys sons rape and maim his
daughter, Lavinia, then crack jokes about her dire condition. Bate interprets these scenes as a
glorious comic parody of tragic plays in the late sixteenth century (1995: 121). He contends
that Titus Andronicus in contrast to its reputation as a primitive example of Shakespeares
writing is a clever and well-structured dark comedy. Yet Ellis questions whether Shakespeares
plays contain black humour. He notes that marrying comedy with violence in Elizabethan
drama is a complicated business, due to a lack of knowledge about the perceptions of
readers/viewers at that time (2001: 388). Ellis suggests that it may be speculative to read black
comedy into texts from previous centuries, yet it is also difficult not to do so give a
contemporary perspective on violence and loss.
20
A strong, dark voice associated with black comedy began to emerge before the two World
Wars within a small number of texts. For example, John Millington Synges 1907 play The
Playboy of the Western World depicts the underlying violence in Irish culture at the turn of last
century. In this text, Christy Mahon a young, impoverished farmer appears at a pub in a
village on the coast of country Mayo. He explains his disheveled appearance by saying he has
just murdered his father in the fields after being threatened by the old man. When Christy
39
receives unexpected attention, he elaborates on the story. The gory and heartless details of the
murder ignite passion and admiration in the villagers. Christy revels in his new fame for twentyfour hours until his robust father arrives at the pub to bring his son back to the family farm. In
this work, Synge demonstrates peoples gullibility and desire for prurient details. Although
Synges work was not identified as black comedy at the time, it tends to be discussed in these
terms today. Llewellyn-Jones (1997) points out that the plays strange blend of mirth and horror
contributes to its charm as well as its controversial history. The first audience to the play (in
Dublin in 1907) broke into a riot which ended the performance. The protest was apparently
ignited by issues of national politics and regional stereotypes more than by the plays dark
humour (Llewellyn-Jones 1997).
40
In this chapter, I discuss various factors that may have contributed to the
popularity and proliferation of black comedy in contemporary society.1 I consider
how changes in the information, practices and institutions surrounding death may
have heightened the desire to make fun of it. I also look at how death is depicted
in the contemporary media and how these stories and images shape peoples
perceptions of mortality. I examine these depictions of death because the media,
in all its iterations, has exerted a major cultural force over recent decades. In this
discussion, I focus on news and entertainment because these entities are
perceived and interpreted in a public context; they are shared cultural artefacts
that reveal the curious, changing ways in which people process loss. I argue that
the media-rich environment of the late twentieth century has been particularly
conducive to the growth and development of black comedy.
This chapter is predicated on the notion that individuals interact with society in a
multifaceted, contested and continuous manner. This concept, which is central to
contemporary critical thought, helps describe the ongoing arbitration between
individuals and social forces. By approaching the phenomenon of humour from
this standpoint, I acknowledge the contribution of postmodern critical theory. Yet
42
this expansive body of work is not the focus of this thesis. Instead, my research
design is based around the key extant theories of humour. My decision to shape
the thesis in this manner is not intended to minimise the relevance of
postmodernism, or to suggest that critical theory lacks relevance to my project,
but it is designed to address specific questions and contain the scope of the
project. As Denzin notes, the terms postmodern and postmodernism speak to
at least four interrelated phenomena [that are woven] into complex,
contradictory fields of experience (1991: 3). It is not feasible to consider the
implications of different strands of postmodern theory in relation to the key
questions in the thesis.
43
were particularly devastating and pervasive (Jalland 2006). Recent events such as
wars, famines, political assassinations, civil and human rights movements,
political debates, religious movements and medical advances have significantly
influenced peoples perceptions of, and practices related to, death. Yet these
transformations did not occur at clearly defined moments; the changes associated
with these events stirred, accelerated, slowed and sparked erratically. In this
chapter, I look at beliefs and behaviours associated with death in the late
twentieth century. I also explore the link between cultural meanings of death and
experiences of black humour. As Giddens says, one of the distinctive features of
modernity is an increasing interconnection betweenglobalising influences on
the one hand and personal dispositions on the other (1991: 1).
Death is one experience with which all individuals are forced to engage. Death
is an essential feature of the human condition and it frequently demands our
complete attention (Mellor and Shilling, 1993: 411). Experiences of loss
constitute some of the most prominent, lasting memories people carry. People
encounter death in diverse ways: through the passing of a loved one, through a
disaster, within the context of work, or through a personal illness causing an
increased awareness of the brevity of life. People also connect to ideas about
death through creative works. There are countless images of violence and loss in
contemporary cultural products: theatre, film, television, dance, art, video games
and the news.
44
Yet the denial of death, however intricately conceived and practised, ignores a
fundamental tenet of the organic system: that death is necessary to the
continuation of life. Bauman calls death the ultimate incongruity because it
juxtaposes the free, rational, abstract human mind with the crude limitations of
the human body (1992: 1). These contradictions illustrate a certain irrationality in
relation to loss. For example, people may sense that their minds and spirits are
capable of unspecified longevity, but that their physical forms disappoint. Crouch
and Huppauf write that death intrudes into human thought in a myriad of ways
(1985: xi). Reminders of mortality emerge unexpectedly and engender complex
responses.
45
and Aged Care, 2000: 1). Due to the uncertainty and discomfort elicited by the
notion of mortality, death has been isolated from other aspects of living (ibid.).
Most people living in contemporary society do not encounter death in their
everyday lives; more commonly, people gain information about death through the
media. Although that information tends to be highly detailed and replete with
personal stories, the virtuality of the connection serves to distance people even
further from the experiences surrounding loss. This reveals a contradiction in
contemporary perceptions of death: although people may acknowledge that death
is inevitable, and they know a great deal about how death occurs, they tend to
separate it out and suppress discussion of it (Giddens 1991). People are reluctant
to wrestle with experiences that disturb their predictable, contained view of their
place in the world, or what Giddens calls their ontological security (1991: 36).
Many individuals feel unprepared when death occurs (Department of Health and
Aged Care, 2000: 1). Although the physical causes of death and images of violent
death are featured prominently in the media, the existential facets of death are
not. People have greater access to objective, statistical information about death
(i.e. medical/physical, governmental) than to subjective information about it (i.e.
spiritual, communal) (Bauman 1992, Giddens 1991, Kellehear 2000). Without the
promise of a meaningful public discourse on death, bereaved individuals may
have to investigate and evaluate their own resources for the emotional aspects of
46
loss. The bereaved may experience a paralysis of will that the ordinary
conventions of day-to-day life usually keep successfully at bay (Giddens, 1991:
3, 37). Although people may acknowledge the death of a loved one, and may be
able to conceive of their own mortality, they may not possess the resources to
deal with these experiences effectively.
One of the possible reasons for this cognitive and emotional paralysis may be the
complex contradiction between the visibility and secrecy of death in
contemporary society. On one hand, death seems to be denied and concealed; on
the other, it seems to be acknowledged and publicised. The next three main
sections of this chapter are devoted to this contradiction and its relevance to the
experience of black humour. First, I look at how death is contained within the
professional domain; second, I consider how death is secularised. Finally, I look
at how death is mediatised in contemporary society. Within this discussion I
include the analysis of two black comic texts.
Medicalising Death
In previous generations, within the countries studied in this thesis, the elderly and
the terminally ill were usually cared for at home by family members. In general,
people knew death close at hand; it was a common event in all age groups
(Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, 2000: 1). Today, it is
mainly the elderly who remember when death was a regular part of both familial
and communal life.
47
age went from 59 years to 81 years for women and 55 years to 76 years for men.
This improvement was similarly pronounced in Great Britain and the United
States over the same period (Najman 2000; National Statistics UK 2000; U.S.
Census Bureau 1999).5
One reason for this change is that death became increasingly medicalised. Instead
of caring for the dying at home, most people relegated these tasks to professional
organisations (e.g. hospitals and hospice care facilities). From approximately
1970 onward, the vast majority of deaths in Australia, Great Britain, Ireland and
the United States occurred within sanctioned institutions. This shifting social
practice placed death in a professional rather than personal space. Jalland notes
that by the last thirty years of the twentieth century, a particular combination of
complex forces was creating a massive challenge for society (2006: 207). The
ageing of the population, in addition to the heightened medicalisation of the
process of dying, meant that death became an alien experience dominated by
doctors [and] detached from everyday life (ibid.). The effect of this societal shift
was to render death almost invisible, secluding it from the community (Lee,
2002). Nuland describes this as a move towards the method of modern dying,
where [death] can be hidden, cleansed of its organic blight, and finally packaged
for modern burial (1997: xv). Currently, more than eighty percent of people in
the United States and Australia die in hospitals; the rest pass away in nursing
homes or hospices (Nuland 1997, Stevens et al. 2000). In Australia, less than
one per cent of people over the age of sixty-five years die by choice in their own
homes (Stevens et al., 2000: 180). Although a terminally ill or elderly person
may wish to remain in the home during the process of dying, this does not
necessarily transpire (Campbell et al. 2000). In contemporary society, people in
the general population rarely witness a death or see a dead body (Kellehear
2000). This means that even some doctors and other health professionals at
least in the early stages of their careers have never seen a person die (Holloway
1996).
48
Modern hospitals and nursing homes tend to shield patients and their families
from the complexities of dying (Nuland 1997, Jalland 2006). People tend to
abdicate responsibility for their health, transferring their sense of control to the
medical system a strategy that can be both reassuring and frightening. To
alleviate anxiety, people want to entrust their lives to the cult of specialists
(Bauman, 1992: 23). Bauman argues that many people, when faced with
mortality, experience diffuse feelings of helplessness and incompetence which
demand permanent assistance of people in the know (ibid.). Kellehear echoes
this point, saying that the last several decades heralded a major period of patient
passivity (2000: 6). People have come to see death as a failure of health and not
as a natural or divine outcome of life (Kellehear, 2001: 509). Many people place
an extensive, perhaps excessive, sense of trust in the medical system to help fight
life-threatening diseases, despite the fact that death must occur at some point in
time. Fighting death is meaningless. But fighting the causes of dying turns into
the meaning of life (Bauman, 1992: 7; italics in the original).
The medical system, and to an extent the media, foster the impression that death
is caused by the failure of a specific organ or body part. While this perspective is
logical within a medical context, it also suggests that death as such is inevitable;
but each concrete instance of death is contingent (Bauman, 1992: 8). This view
of death may manifest itself in a conceptual separation of the diseased parts of the
body; the body parts become entities to be attacked and defeated, rather than
components of a complex and natural physical life. This emphasis on overcoming
disease, Bauman argues, is simply a way of saying I would rather die of that than
this or I would rather die then than now (1992: 10). The medicalisation of
death carries with it a deceptive sense of hope: people believe they can
continuously postpone death with better health practices, pharmaceuticals,
surgery and other treatments. In the coming years, cloning and human stem cell
research may also significantly change peoples perspectives on death.
49
This preoccupation with youth is not restricted to the medical system, but extends
to its imitators, such as the cosmetics industry. Modifications to the face and
body, to emulate the appearance of youth, have become commonplace. Through
its marketing, the cosmetic industry says that people can do something about
ageing and dying. As a result, the vast majority of faces in the media have been
altered (either surgically or digitally). This sets up an artificial public image for
the process of ageing. With these modifications, the physical body becomes a
project: a work perpetually in progress. The implication is that the natural body
with its variations, vulnerabilities and inevitable decline is not acceptable.
Ageing and dying are frequently perceived as suspicious, rather than being
ordinary aspects of human existence (Bauman, 1992: 20). Along these lines,
50
Gorer argues that the process of ageing is considered as disgusting as the natural
processes of copulation and birth were a century ago (1995: 20). This set of
circumstances does not encourage people to prepare for dying; people who are
busy trying to extend their lives will have little opportunity to contemplate their
future as old or infirm individuals. Mellor and Shilling predict the effects of this
avoidance: The more people prioritise [a connection between] self-identity and
the body, the more difficult it will be for them to cope with the idea of the self
ceasing to exist (1993: 414).
The twentieth century was the first period in which an individual was more likely
to die in old age than in infancy (Jalland 2006). As a result of improved health
practices, the process of dying now takes longer than ever before. In Australia,
the vast majority of people die slowly rather than suddenly. Many people have, or
will have, significant, if not major, disabilities that require medical care and
continuing community support (Najman, 2000: 33). This trend is set to continue
in Australia, Great Britain and the United States: if life expectancy continues to
increase and the birth rate declines or stabilises at its current level, the percentage
of elderly people in the population will increase markedly after the year 2010
(Najman 2000). It is not clear how society will care for a sizable proportion of
people who are in the process of dying, grieving or both.
Over the past three decades, however, there have been significant developments
in hospices and home-based care programs for the dying.6 These efforts offer an
alternative to a medicalised passing in hospital. In 1986 the World Heath
Organisation published a definition of palliative care which recognised that the
psychological, social and spiritual problems associated with dying, as well as the
control of pain, are paramount (Maddocks 1996: 61). In addition, the
development of professional bereavement therapy and the publication of
influential books on bereavement have changed peoples understanding of the
effects of loss (Jalland 2006). These resources, such as Kubler-Ross (1969) On
Death and Dying, have had a significant social impact.
51
52
(sitting and watching television) and the deceased mother (lying in a casket in the
same location). The casket becomes an obstacle to the surviving family members.
Today, people tend to be uncomfortable with the idea of a corpse in their private
home. Instead, the dead body is something that should be disposed of
immediately, albeit carefully and thoughtfully, so that living memories of the
deceased individual can continue. Over recent years, it has become less common
to view a casket, open or closed, at any time in the grieving process. More often
than not, the body of the deceased is not present at the event that marks its
demise. As often as not, the dead are unwelcome at their own obsequies
(Mellor, 1993: 22). Crouch (2004) argues that the practice of not having a casket
at a memorial service symbolically hides the corpse and thereby denies the
permanency of death. In the absence of a body, bereaved individuals may have
difficulty acknowledging the loss. The disposal [of the corpse] is hedged about
with ritual to fence in the dangers it signifies (Crouch, 2004: 1).
Another shift in practices associated with death, and one which also seems to
depersonalise the corpse, is the marked increase in cremations. At the beginning
of the twentieth century, there were no crematoria in Australia. It was not until
after World War II that the practice of cremation gained acceptance (Nicol 2000).
Jalland (2006) argues that veterans memories of dead soldiers, rotting on the
ground on a battle site, may have led them to choose cremation for themselves
and their loved ones in subsequent decades. Nicol notes that cremation was seen
53
as more hygienic than burial in the early twentieth century. During this period,
heightened awareness of public health issues [affected] the policies adopted with
regard to the disposal of human remains (Nicol, 2000: 97). It also appears that a
decline in organised religion, discussed further below, may have influenced the
growing acceptance of cremation because a number of religions do not deem the
practice acceptable.7 Thus, people may be more likely to choose cremation if they
are not affiliated with any particular religious group. Through a combination of
these social forces, the percentage of deceased people being cremated in Australia
rose to over fifty percent by the end of the twentieth century. At this time in Great
Britain, the percentage was approximately seventy percent; in the United States it
was twenty-five percent (Nicol 2000; Mitford 2000).
54
look another cultural shift that affects contemporary perceptions of death: the
diminishing influence of organised religion.
Secularising Death
In previous centuries, organised religion played a primary role in shaping
peoples beliefs about death by providing a sense of meaning for loss (Jalland
2006). Many religious teachings and services were, and are, intended to help
explain death and ameliorate the distress associated with it. Religion tends to
provide a communal context for death, conceptualising it as a necessary and
continuous aspect of the natural life cycle. One of the other main concerns of
religion is the life of the soul after death. As discussed further below, this focus
on eternal spiritual existence has influenced practices associated with the demise
of the human body, including medical interventions, palliative care, funerals and
the handling of corpses.
During the twentieth century, most individuals living in Australia, the United
Kingdom, Ireland and the United States were aligned with the Christian tradition,
although other religious groups also had a major impact on beliefs and
behaviours associated with death: Judaism, Islam, Buddhism and other systems
of religious thought permeated the collective culture in these four countries. From
approximately the middle of the twentieth century onward, however, religion has
been a less powerful cultural force than it was previously (Aries 1981, Jalland
2006). During this time, the percentage of people involved in organised religion
declined markedly; people living in the Anglophone world have been
renegotiating their relationship with organised religion (Kellehear, 2001: 508).8
For example, in the 1990s, the number of Australians who stated that they did not
belong to any religious group increased by thirty-five percentage points (A.B.S.
Year Book Australia 2003: online). Mellor and Shilling point to an overall
reduction in the scope of the sacred; they see this shift away from organised
religion as one of the major sociological changes of the twentieth century (1993:
413).
55
One of the results of increased secularism has been that many people lack a
means of containing [death] in an over-arching, existentially meaningful, ritual
structure (Mellor and Shilling, 1993: 427). In turn, the increasing power of the
health care system has obscured the role of the church (Rumbold 2000). This
shift from a communal, religious perspective to a more individual, medical one
emphasises the physical reality of death, rather than its spiritual meaning.
Currently, the clinical aspects of individuals dying and grieving dominate social
consciousness, individualising and marginalising traditional religious practices
and beliefs (Rumbold, 2000: 286). In addition, pastoral care for the terminally ill
has become less religious (Rumbold 2000). Previously, pastoral carers generally
worked within the context of a particular faith to help people cope with death.
Today, pastoral care tends to represent a wide range of perspectives. It requires
an eclectic approach, including traditional pastoral discourses, an active search
for alliances with new spiritualities, and an exploration of non-clinical health
paradigms (Rumbold, 2000: 286). This increased spiritual relativism represents
a major cultural change in relation to death.
56
mourn a loved one and to adjust to that persons disappearance from the
community. These services usually focussed on the communal experience of
living and dying (Jalland 2006). Over the past two to three decades, however,
funeral practices have changed markedly; they are now less entwined with
organised religion and more focussed on the characteristics and achievements of
a particular deceased individual. The shift away from religion has changed
contemporary memorial services. Currently, funerals range from traditional
religious rituals to secular events to any combination of these (Mellor and
Shilling 1993, Rumbold 2000). Contemporary funerals, if they are in honour of
an individual who is not famous, are likely to be private, personal occasions
rather than public, community events. These services generally seem little
concerned with the nature of human existence and the life of the soul after death.
Instead, they seem focussed on providing a diverse and animated record of an
individual life (Crouch 2004).
57
Another service which has recently emerged within the death industry is the
funeral planner. This individual is akin to a party or wedding consultant, but
specialises in funerals.11 This service can be purchased either before death
(similar to purchasing a burial plot while still alive), or a relative/friend may
subscribe to the service after the loss of a loved one. The funeral planner
professionalises duties that were previously accomplished by the community of
friends and relatives that surrounded the bereaved. The market for this service
58
may not only be wealthy individuals; it also seems to be aimed at those who do
not want to deal directly with the issues and tasks that accompany death.
On the other hand, globalisation of the funeral industry may encourage more
personalised memorial events. Companies like SCI capitalise on peoples desire
to individualise and localise death by offering a multitude of funeral options.
Increasingly, the bereaved choose from various service frameworks and slot in
the songs, texts and images that befit their loved one. Through this process, the
notion of a funeral becomes flexible, private and specific, in contrast to the
public, timeless emphasis of traditional religious services. Kellehear suggests that
a growing emphasis on choice, discernment and privacy has effectively brought
death out of the communal sphere (2001: 509).
Mediatising Death
While the preceding discussion focussed predominantly on the ways in which
death is kept private and separate from everyday life, this section looks at how
death is made public and visible. The following discussion investigates media
coverage of death in recent decades. How is death depicted in the media? How
might images of violence and corpses affect peoples perceptions of death?
59
The overwhelming majority of deaths presented in the media (both in news and
fictional entertainment) are caused by violence. Geoffrey Gorer writes that while
natural death [has become] more and more smothered in prudery, violent death
has played an ever-growing part in the fantasies offered to mass audiences
(1995: 21). Although violent or sudden deaths represent only a small percentage
of actual deaths per annum around six percent in Australia the scenarios
presented on television (in both fictional and realistic material) focus on sudden,
tragic, multiple deaths (Najman 2000). Television, print and internet media rarely
cover a story about a single, natural death unless the person was a public figure.
Jalland (2006) points out that when media coverage is predominantly given to
deaths from disasters, wars and outbreaks of disease, it can be difficult for people
to grieve the loss of a individual a loved one whose life was not deemed worthy
of publicity.
60
The media do take an interest, however, when several individuals are killed in
related circumstances or within the same incident (Fought 2002, pers. comm, 18
March). This gives the impression that death is largely a function of crime,
addiction, accidents and natural disasters. As a result, people tend to overestimate
the likelihood that they will be harmed by violence or disasters. The prevalence
of death-related images and stories in the media seems to magnify peoples fears
in relation to sudden and violent death (Gorer 1995).
News coverage has also become more concerned with the personal than with the
social or political (Hijer 2004). Individual stories of loss tend to pique peoples
interest and are simple to follow; these incidents also seem specific and situated,
so they may feel less threatening to readers/viewers/listeners. Finally, individual
stories seem contained and isolated, so they require less collective responsibility
to address the conditions of trauma. This tendency to individualise death seems to
reflect the highly focussed, self-referential nature of contemporary society.
Giddens (1991) argues that peoples concern with uniqueness and selfpreservation is a major characteristic of life in the late twentieth century. The
foregrounding of the personal in news stories about death also pertains to the
types of victims who receive attention. Hijers (2004) research suggests that,
over the past two decades, stories about death have focussed on individual
civilians and have displayed increasingly brutal images.
61
Another influential aspect of the news coverage of death is that stories are
depicted in quick succession, often without coverage of the consequences.
Information about death and disasters sweeps rapidly across the globe, and
therefore seems omnipresent in world news. Viewers/readers/listeners are
constantly entreated to notice, to participate briefly in stories about death, and
then to allow the losses to slip smoothly into the stream of information received
each day. Bauman points out that in the contemporary media, deaths are usually
episodes [or] occurrences with no history and no follow up, one-off happenings
(Bauman, 1992: 30). In a sense, people in contemporary society are never not
invited to grieve. As a result, death may become only momentarily meaningful.
There are so many deaths in the news that viewers need to dismiss the losses
almost as swiftly as they are presented. Most often, viewers are given information
only about the victims demise, not their actual lives, so both victims and
survivors soon seem anonymous.
Yet the media rely upon tragedy for news. Images of trauma are part of our
political economy. Papers are sold, television programs gain audience shareand
prizes are awarded through the appropriation of images of suffering (Kleinman
and Kleinman, 1997: 8). Langer says that television news must include stories
[about death, accidents and disasters] in order to retain its modus operandi
(1998: 75, italics in the original). Events as major as the terrorist attacks on the
World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001 are covered so extensively that they
become what Volkan calls a chosen trauma (2003: 218). These types of events
garner extensive emotional, political and financial attention. Other tragedies, such
as the schoolyard murders of four children and a teacher in 1998 in Arkansas,
have fewer victims and therefore make the front page only once. Tragedies like
this fade from consciousness and wash into the sea of anguish reported in each
days news. Stories of single deaths receive even less coverage in the mainstream
media. Ordinary people who pass away quietly each day are not part of collective
cultural experience, except in the obituaries. This creates an unrealistic contrast:
the deaths (from natural causes) of anonymous, single individuals are sheltered
from public view, while the deaths of numerous individuals at once, or
62
Over the past decade, peoples exposure to death via the media has become
increasingly vivid (Kearl 1989: 23). To continue holding [peoples] interest,
Kearl observes, the entertainment industry must constantly outdo itself
(ibid.). Furthermore, information about death is now available twenty-four hours
per day on television and radio news programs, on the internet and in fictional
entertainment. With the advent of new technologies related to preserving
material, people can now view and personalise images of deaths at any time, in
public or in private, by replaying the scenes an infinite number of times (Bauman
1993, Kearl 1989). Access to violent video games and television programs
focussing on forensics means that people may more quickly and easily enter into
the intimate details of pain and misfortune (Kleinman and Kleinman, 1997: 1).
In short, people living in contemporary society may engage with the details of
death in a continuous, virtual environment. Although the deaths depicted may be
fictional, these media provide a superfluity of death images.
As noted above, the sheer number of deaths people are exposed to in the media,
and the intensity of their presentation, may be overwhelming. Furthermore, if an
individual chooses to engage with one disastrous situation, that concern may still
be present when the next tragedy strikes. Bauman believes the main function of
the news is to chase yesterdays news off and to be driven away by tomorrows
news (1992: 29). Thus, deaths in the media tend to become part of a continuous
parade of individuals with distressing histories. This was particularly evident in
the news coverage of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. News coverage
of these events was intense, graphic and pervasive. In the days and weeks
following the attacks, pictures and narratives of loss were ubiquitous. On the day
of the attacks and for several days thereafter, television networks repeatedly
showed the second jet crashing into the World Trade Center. The news coverage
63
of September 11 had an unsettling fictional quality. The plane crashing into the
tower reminded people of images they had seen in films with an apocalyptic tone
(Erth 2002).
What are the effects of intensive or long-term exposure to media stories about
death? Research on the media coverage of the September 11 attacks reveals that
many thousands of people felt distressed upon encountering recurrent images of
death and destruction. Erths (2002) review of this work cites a significant
positive correlation between the duration and intensity of exposure to media
coverage and symptoms of stress and depression. (Most studies in this area
measured symptoms via the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV definition of
PTSD, or Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, and MDD, or Major Depressive
Disorder; other studies used alternative indicators of distress.) The correlation
between viewing hours and levels of distress does not necessarily indicate
causation. Although research shows that PTSD and MDD can be caused or
exacerbated by graphic images of death, it also suggests that people who are more
prone to MDD, or tend to be more affected by violent images, may also be drawn
to watch more television coverage (Erth 2002, Pfefferbaum et al. 2002).
Pfefferbaum et al. note that peoples responses to initial media coverage of a
tragedy may simply reflect [the] horror of the event itself; it is difficult to
separate out these factors in research (2002: 307). The experience of learning
about multiple, violent deaths through the media may now be considered a risk
factor for PTSD in both adults and children. Thus, Erth (2002) calls for a
reconsideration of the notion of trauma to include not only firsthand experience
of death but also media exposure to real, graphic stories and pictures of death.
Despite the magnitude of media coverage of the events of September 11, there
was remarkably little public debate about the effects of these explicit images of
death and stories of loss. There were discussions and research projects within the
academic community, but these findings were rarely discussed in a broad public
forum. There were, however, efforts to construct media guidelines for parents and
broadcasters in relation to children because there is now no question that
64
Hijer (2004) describes the ways in which people distance themselves from
media stories of death. One method, which is a conscious process for some
individuals and unconscious for others, involves [rejecting] the truth claim of
the reporting (Hijer, 2004: 524). In this response, people decide that news
stories are exaggerated or fabricated so that they are less affecting. Other
individuals choose to believe that the victims of tragedy induced the disastrous
circumstances themselves and do not deserve sympathy. Each of these responses
negates the sense of collective global compassion (Hijer, 2004: 515). People
habituate to data about death and, as a result, the desire to help fades over time.
Empathy fatigue seems to be inversely proportional to efficacy, or the ability to
change tragic circumstances. People disconnect when they feel ineffectual in the
face of suffering (Hijer 2004).
65
personal losses. Black comedy exploits this sense of confusion and apprehension.
In this sense, black comedy is both a product of, and a contributing factor in, the
simultaneous sequestration and saturation of images of death. I suggest that
participants get black comedy because they understand the circumstances
surrounding the death depicted in a text, but they are able to place distance
between themselves and the loss. The contemporary media shape this situation;
they provide both the death-related stories/images and the sense of virtuality. In
the social circumstances of the late twentieth century, therefore, people are
ideally situated to perceive and appreciate black comedy. (I return to this
assertion at the end of this chapter, but first I illustrate the juxtaposition with a
key example of contemporary black comedy.)
The black humour in the screenplay for the film MASH emerges more from a
series of juxtapositions between scenes, rather than from the witty one-liners
characteristic of the screenplays for the subsequent television series M*A*S*H
(1972-1983). In one scene from the film, the surgeons are tangled in the triage of
dozens of dying bodies. They rush from patient to patient, stemming the flow of
blood and making urgent decisions about medication and intervention. Later in
the same day, the surgeons create schemes to catch their female colleagues in the
66
nude. On another occasion, the surgeons and nurses take time off to drink beer
and lounge by the river in the sun. Suddenly they are strafed by gunfire and
scramble behind rocks to survive. These sharp shifts between deadly destruction
and the affirmation of life, between utter dismay and delight, create black
comedy.
In another scene, the surgeons find that their arterial clamps are inadequate and
blood spurts up from a soldiers neck like a ghastly fountain. The surgeons and
nurses, sticky from the blood, have to improvise a solution. In this moment, the
natural, organic side of humanity overwhelms the technical, inanimate side; the
medical staff have to acknowledge that they will not always defeat death. When
these situations occur, the ability to joke about death enables the characters to
gain perspective, ameliorate tension and increase their stamina for future work.
Dickstein (1993), in analysing a range of novels from the 1960s (although not
specifically the original 1968 novel of MASH), highlights the pervasiveness of
black comedy in these texts. He says that black comedy is pitched at the
breaking point where moral anguish explodes into a mixture of comedy and
terror, where things are so bad you might as well laugh (1993: 127).
After many months at war, Hawkeye learns that he and fellow surgeon Augustus
Duke Forrest have fulfilled their tour of duty. Hawkeye bursts into the operating
theatre to inform his buddy of the good news.
HAWKEYE:
We can go home now.
DUKE:
Now?
HAWKEYE:
Anytime we want.
DUKE:
Can we get outta this guys brain first?
(1970)
67
When the film MASH was released in 1970, the parallels between the Korean and
Vietnam wars were obvious. Director Robert Altman intended for MASH to
resonate with current events. Many individuals, distressed by the war-related
deaths they witnessed in the news and within their communities, participated in
anti-war protests. Other individuals were part of pro-military rallies. On both
sides there was a deep sense of concern surrounding the seeming impossibilities
of winning the war. As a result, people may have been especially receptive to the
irreverence, melancholy and ambiguity in this text. MASH was a highly popular
and profitable film; it also won critical acclaim and awards. In the context of the
late 1960s and early 1970s, the black comedy in MASH was perceived as
refreshing and empowering. It seems that the mixture of farce, violence and
hysteria in [the texts of this period] stems from the wars, riots, movements,
assassinations,
conspiracies
[and]
much
subtler
and
less
spectacular
Hijer (2004), although she does not comment on black comic texts, draws a link
between media coverage of death and the tendency for people to vacillate
between engagement with, and disengagement from, this information. She
highlights the feeling of desensitisation that stems from extensive media exposure
to trauma. Hijer describes the experience of empathy as a series of waves.
68
People feel empathetic towards victims, then tend to feel exhausted by news of
continuous sadness, so they retreat. Before long, another disaster beckons their
attention and they experience a fresh surge of empathy; this feeling then loses its
potency as well. The following section considers some of the social and cultural
effects of this cycle in contemporary society. In particular, I work with the notion
of coolness, one of the cultural options for individuals living in a society which
has a problematic relationship to death. In this discussion, I link the concept of
coolness to contemporary black comedy.
69
The twin threats of death and grief are difficult to grasp for those living in the
peaceful suburbs. For those who do not experience actual threats to their survival,
coolness is about becoming powerful within a social network.14 People who lead
relatively protected lives, and particularly those who are young, tend to engage
with images and narratives about death vicariously through the media. They may
adopt a cool attitude by watching news and entertainment containing
information about death and by imitating the behaviour of others. This cool
comportment seems to involve a sense of psychosocial detachment; the
individual is of the metropolis, yet rides slightly above it. The quality of being
cool seems yoked with the latter twentieth century (Harris 1999). This point is
also relevant to the early twenty-first century because these issues have
continued, even magnified, over the past several years. As Denzin describes it,
the public self and its masks are increasingly defined by a media-oriented mass
culture in which youth, health and sexuality have taken on premium values
(1991: 5). In contemporary society, cool people are perceived as unconventional,
cynical, indifferent and knowing.
Being cool about death involves being calm, distant, unafraid and clever in the
face of violence and loss. Instead of being shocked by death, cool people seem to
know what to do. In this sense, coolness is a vital element in many black comic
texts. Boskin (1997) points out that comedy from the latter twentieth century
tends to be urban in focus, partly due to the influence of immigrants from Europe
and African Americans from the American South who moved into the cities in
significant numbers from the 1960s onwards. Boskin characterises contemporary
comedy as aggressively witty and sly, prodding and absurdist, bordering on
catastrophe and gallows, and representative of the underdog (1997: 122).
The current social phenomenon of the Darwin Awards reveals peoples appetite
for cool, violent black comedy.15 Structured as a contest (with no prizes), the
Darwin Awards publicise the actions of people who have unintentionally killed
themselves in bizarre ways (Northcutt 2000). The Darwin Awards are named
after Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution.16 The winners are given their
70
awards posthumously because they are said to have reduced the average level of
ineptitude in the collective gene pool. The awards are reported as a long list of
unfortunate individuals; each name is accompanied by a graphic description of
the persons death. Recent winners include a man shot dead while trying to rob a
gun store with a knife, a terrorist who misunderstood the timing of the bomb he
was carrying and a zookeeper killed by a quarter-tonne of elephant excrement.
In response to the first question, participants may simply enjoy the frisson of
these graphic incidents. Participants may also seek to release anxiety surrounding
death, especially in an environment in which they feel they cannot openly discuss
their losses. The Darwin Awards seem to provide a culturally acceptable avenue
for information about death. In addition, participants may use these stories to
reassure themselves that premature death affects only to those who make foolish
decisions. These possible explanations relate to the three key theories of humour
incongruity, catharsis and superiority each of which is discussed further in the
following chapters.
In relation to the second question above, the Darwin Awards provide a prominent
indicator of how death is perceived and communicated in contemporary society.
It may be that the Darwin Awards function as a collective response to constant,
pointless violence depicted in the news. The Darwin Awards may also provide an
anonymous way of discussing death, and in particular death that is sudden,
71
The appeal of the Darwin Awards may also be related to Mellors (1993) notion
of the simultaneous absence and presence of death in contemporary society. Due
to the invisibility of real, personal death, participants may seek an unconventional
forum for the expression of objective, even scientific, details of fatal events. For
example, in one story a man lights a bowl of gunpowder with a blowtorch. In
another, a man causes a devastating explosion by combining red phosphorus and
iodine (ingredients used to make illegal drugs) into an empty film canister, which
he hides in his pocket. While these stories have a prurient allure, they also focus
attention on the mechanics of death. Drawing on Bauman (1992), I suggest that
the Darwin Awards reconfigure death as both specific and contingent. This makes
death seem less threatening and therefore funnier.
72
In the first scene, Vincent and Jules casually discuss hamburgers and sex on their
way to a pre-arranged murder. Driving along with automatic weapons in the boot
of their vehicle, the two professional hit men appear to be two average
commuters on the way to work. During the hit, Jules brings up trivial issues and
thereby taunts his prey. He inquires about the type of hamburgers the young men
are eating and remarks upon the hairstyle of another boy before killing him. You
ever had a Big Kahuna burger? he asks. The victims are too terrified to reply.
Me, I cant usually eat em because my girlfriends a vegetarianbut I sure love
the taste of a good burger (Tarantino, 1994: 26). Jules and Vincent are so
accustomed to killing that they conduct casual conversations before and after the
murders. Ellis points out that the ordinariness of this subject matter means that
readers/viewers can build a connection with the hit men. Jules and Vincent seem
like regular guys; they cannot be comfortably dismissed as a race apart (2001:
386). Thus, the scene creates a troubling continuity between normal life and [the
hit mens] unusual profession (ibid.).
The mens conversations reveal a detached attitude towards death. This attitude,
in turn, creates a sense of incongruity because the mens position defies social
mores about the sanctity of human life. These men seem cool because they are
not concerned about the personal risks they take or the destruction they wreak;
they see murder as just one aspect of their jobs. This creates a juxtaposition
between how most people react to violent death and how these men respond.
Participants may experience black humour through this surprising, confronting
contrast. Yet within the reality of the text, the characters do not find their
73
situation funny. The black humour in Pulp Fiction is not intentionally created by
the characters; it emerges from peoples perceptions of the characters words and
actions in relation to death. (This issue is discussed further in the following
chapter on incongruity.)
VINCENT:
I just accidentally shot Marvin in the throat.
JULES:
Why the fuck did you do that?
VINCENT:
I didn't mean to. I said it was an accident.
JULES:
I've seen a lot of crazy-ass shit in my time...
VINCENT:
Look! I didn't mean to shoot the son-of-a-bitch, the gun just
went off, don't ask me how!
JULES:
Look at this mess! We're driving around on a city street in
broad daylight -VINCENT:
-- I know, I know, I wasn't thinking about the splatter.
JULES:
Well, you better be thinking about it now, motherfucker! We
gotta get this car off the road. Cops tend to notice shit like you
driving a car drenched in fuckin' blood.
(Tarantino, 1994b: 141-143)
74
Tarantino raises the stakes in this scene: the men who seemed imperturbable are
not cool enough. Jules boss calls in Mr. Winston Wolf, known as The Wolf, an
expert in cleaning up disasters that involve the disposal of a corpse. He arrives in
a tuxedo with the details of the upcoming operation written neatly on a pad of
paper: "1 body (no head)" (152). The Wolf's professionalism is in contrast with
the vile nature of his task. He remains completely calm when he sees the dead
body in the car. He then directs the two hit men to mop up Marvin's remains.
While doing so, they blame each other for the gross task, completely disregarding
the loss of human life.
JULES:
I will never forgive your ass for this shit. This is some fuckedup repugnant shit.
VINCENT:
Jules, did you ever hear the philosophy that once a man admits
hes wrong, hes immediately forgiven for all wrongdoings?
JULES:
Man, get outta my face with that shit. The motherfucker who
said that never had to pick up itty-bitty pieces of skull with his
fingers on account of your dumb assIn fact, what the fuck
am I doin in the back? [You] should be on brain detail
(Tarantino, 1994: 158-9)
Lewis points out that this type of black comedy reduces the human body to the
level of charred protoplasmic filth (1997: 267). A act that destroys the corpse
also obfuscates the individuality of the victim (ibid.). In Pulp Fiction, Marvin
becomes an anonymous, unrecoverable entity. The text does not provide any
further information about the effects of Marvins death on his family and friends.
In order to perceive the black humour in this scene, participants cannot think or
feel too much about those effects, either. The experience of black humour seems
to require a suspension of sympathy (Lewis, 1997: 268). Lewis asserts that
when participants perceive black humour, they temporarily refuse to empathise
with their fellow human beings.
75
As the clean-up operation continues in the next scene, Jules and Vincent slip
outside their normal roles. The two cynical hit men suddenly seem like confused,
squeamish teenagers. In the bathroom, Jules yells at Vincent for drying his
bloody hands on a white towel.
JULES:
Youre supposed to wash em first.
VINCENT:
You watched me wash em.
JULES:
I watched you get em wet.
VINCENT:
I washed em. Bloods real hard to get off
JULES:
I used the same soap you did and when I finished with that
towel it didnt look like a fuckin Maxi Pad.
(Tarantino, 1994: 145-146)
Throughout the clean-up, the Wolf orders Jules and Vincent around like naughty,
muddy children. They are forced to stand nude in their friends back garden while
The Wolf hoses them down. In this scene, neither Jules nor Vincent fits the
stereotype of a gun for hire. Although they appear to be a powerful team in the
first scene, their inability to deal with the grotesque realities of a riddled corpse
reveals that they are not entirely in control of death. The hit men are cool, yet not
cool enough. The black comedy in this scene stems from the hit mens fading
bravado, which is in contrast to the Wolfs equanimity.
Mr. Wolf dispenses with all remnants of the dead body. This process may be seen
as a metaphor for the privatisation and medicalisation of death in contemporary
society. In this scene, the loss of life is treated quickly and effectively by a
trained clinician. The effect is that death seems minimised, even entirely absent,
from the situation. Yet at the same time, the saturation of blood, skin and bone in
the car (which Jules nervously drives around Los Angeles in broad daylight)
76
symbolises the mediatisation of death. The hyper-cool hit men cannot cope with
the pervasiveness of the mess they have created; the realities of the corpse
overwhelm them. Thus, death seems highly present in the situation. As discussed
further below and in the following chapter, this is strange juxtaposition between
the absence and presence of death shapes the black comedy in this and other
texts from the late twentieth century.
In another darkly comic scene from Pulp Fiction, a professional boxer called
Butch returns to his apartment to find a submachine gun on the kitchen counter.
He knows he is being tracked by a hired killer, but he does not know where the
hit man is. When Butch hears a noise in the bathroom, he quickly picks up the
gun. Vincent opens the bathroom door and Butch slaughters him. The scene
contains several juxtapositions: Vincent's location (sitting on the toilet as opposed
to keeping watch), his treatment of a weapon (leaving the gun unattended several
meters away, instead of being vigilant with it), and his death at the hands of the
man he was supposed to kill. Another comic contrast emerges from Butchs
response to the submachine gun. Despite the fact that he just killed a man the
night before and proceeds to kill two more that day, Butch is wary of the
powerful weapon. His lack of familiarity with the gun means that he is as
surprised as his victim when Vincent flies backwards from the force of twenty
bullets. Each of these incongruous pairings creates the potential for black
humour.17
In some ways, Pulp Fiction appears to minimise the impact of violence; it makes
death seem quick, insignificant and surreal. The text does not provide background
on the murdered characters, nor indicate the consequences of these deaths. Thus,
the murders are self-contained incidents, almost violent games, and therefore
seem simple and dismissible. When The Wolf is asked who the dead body was in
the car, he answers: Nobody wholl be missed (1994: 157). There is a clinical
frigidity to these deaths. With the exception of the accidental shooting of Marvin,
the murders are not considered unethical, problematic or disruptive and they are
not re-evaluated afterwards. The customary emotions associated with death
77
sadness, anger and remorse are missing from these scenes. In some ways, death
seems to be denied, hidden and unmourned.
In other ways, Pulp Fiction places death in the foreground. Virtually every main
character in the text (except The Wolf) faces his/her own death on at least one
occasion: Jules, Vincent, Butch, Marsellus, Marsellus wife Mia and two thieves
called Pumpkin and Honey Bunny all narrowly escape a sudden and unpleasant
demise. (Vincent is not as fortunate the second time, when Butch kills him.)
Death is a driving force for these characters; they run from it, to a certain extent,
but they also chase after it. In this way, the notion of death, in all its unwieldy
complexity, is both very present in, and very absent from, this text. While death
serves as a powerful, visceral presence in each of the interlocking stories, the
issues associated with loss (e.g. funerals, burials, cremations, financial
responsibilities and relationship changes) are never overtly discussed.
Pulp Fiction and the Darwin Awards exemplify the key issues discussed in this
chapter. Pulp Fiction, in particular, shows how people sequester death and
simultaneously revel in it; (this may be true for both characters and participants
who engage with the text). The black humour in this text emerges through a
powerful juxtaposition between the overt and hidden aspects of death. The
following section looks more closely at the contradiction between the absence
and presence of death in contemporary society.
78
Death is always a part of peoples lives, but its not an organic part
of life anymore in this culture, so our relationship to it is quite
different... Now people who die are put away from the family. We
have systems instead of rituals; its more disorientating.
(1998: 2)
In drawing upon the work of Walter (1991), Mellor notes that individuals in
contemporary society are caught between two conflicting traditions: (a) their
inherited knowledge of a time when death was romanticised and grief was overt,
and (b) a contemporary society in which death is sequestered and grief is
abnegated (1993: 412).
In this chapter, I set forth the argument that contemporary social attitudes and
practices surrounding death, in combination with the pervasiveness of media
information about death, create a problematic juxtaposition. People living in
79
contemporary society have a sense of knowing and yet not knowing death, a
sense of engaging with it and retreating from it. As people attempt to make
meaning from death and grief, they encounter contradictory notions. On one
hand, there is the perception that grief should not be discussed, nor corpses
viewed, lest the visible confirmation of death diminish the celebration of a
deceased persons life. As noted previously, many memorial services now ignore
the eternal, communal aspects of death and instead serve as sunny summaries of
peoples lives. In this way, people maintain a kind of disconnect with real death.
On the other hand, there is an awareness that death is ever-present and therefore
the realities of loss should be acknowledged. It is almost impossible to avoid
stories about, and images of, death. In news broadcasts and in entertainment
(especially television, films and video games), people are killed with chilling
regularity. Kearl points out that the staple of death is essential to the success of
the news (1989: 24). Films render intense, calibrated visions of destruction.
People who engage with these texts and images are thrown into the midst of
death, saturated in its furore and gore, but spared its finality. (As noted above,
these cultural artefacts may show consequences for the perpetrators of violence,
but rarely for its victims.) There are no efforts to conceal loss in these contexts;
the number of deceased individuals serves as a measure of an events importance,
even its allure. In contemporary culture, death is a commodity.
80
At the same time, black humour seems to require enmeshment with death. As
noted above, people living in contemporary society are bombarded with images
and information about the failure of the human form. People use this information
to understand black humour, to place themselves in a space where they are
emotionally and intellectually prepared to laugh at death. I believe that the
increased medicalisation and secularisation of death sets up a situation in which
people can be irreverent in relation to death.
I contend that black comedy became increasingly popular and prevalent in the
late twentieth century as a response to the juxtaposition between the absence and
presence of death. Black comedy seems appealing because it enables people to
wrestle with death indirectly, to play with the concept of loss. It seems that the
experience of black humour emerges from, and in turn shapes, a sense of
uncertainty surrounding death. I suggest that black comedy is part of a complex,
ongoing process of articulating perceptions of loss; it is an attempt to describe the
meaning of existence within the unique circumstances of contemporary society.
As discussed further in the following two chapters, black comedy is replete with
contrasts; it is both offensive and harmless, ridiculous and profound. In Chapter
3, I consider the structures of black comedy using the incongruity theory of
81
82
Chapter 2 Endnotes
1
As discussed in the preceding chapter, I am cognisant of the implications of using the term
contemporary society in reference to the modern Anglophone world. I apply this phrase in order
to highlight the shared aspects of culture in the countries-of-origin for the texts I examine in the
thesis: Australia, Great Britain, Ireland and the United States. By using this phrase, I do not
suggest that each of these countries possesses a unified, identifiable, single culture only that
people within and between these national groups have in common certain aspects of their lives,
which in turn influence their perceptions of death. Kellehear notes that, in relation to death, the
"shifts in demography and epidemiology in Australia parallel [similar changes] in Europe and the
United States" (2000: 10).
2
I recognise that there are a number of issues within each of the areas of inquiry I identify in this
chapter, and that any one of these issues could be the core of another project. To contain the scope
of the thesis, I limit the discussion to a concise consideration of particular issues within each of
these questions. As with any project, I also acknowledge that there is room for additional analysis
in future research.
3
In Discipline and Punish, Foucault describes a collective, prurient interest in death and how, in
previous centuries, people reveled in public executions. However, as executions moved away
from slow, public torture towards the ideal of a swift, private death, the theatrical representation
of pain was excluded from punishment (1977:14). This meant that death (in the form of capital
punishment) became sequestered. The privatisation of death is discussed further in this chapter of
the thesis, although the present work concentrates upon ideas and images related to natural,
accidental, homicidal and suicidal deaths rather than capital punishment.
4
Although Jallands (2006) research focuses on Australia, her work also refers to social
conditions that were present at the same time in the United Kingdom, Ireland and the United
States.
5
Life expectancy is predicted to increase in the coming years, albeit at a slower rate. However,
for certain social groups within these larger populations, these statistics are not representative. For
the Indigenous people of Australia, life expectancy remained disturbingly low at the end of the
twentieth century: 56 years for men and 63 for women (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2003).
This statistic was echoed in the relatively short average life span of men, especially, in some
regions of the United States. Native American men had a life expectancy of only 56 years, and
African-American men less than 60 years (C.J. Murray et al. 1998).
6
In Australia, recent efforts to develop more diverse hospice programs have led to a modest
increase in the percentage of people who receive palliative care in a home environment, usually
from family members (Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care 2000). The hospice
movement seeks to provide carers with community support and information about their roles in
the lives of the infirm.
7
For those following Islam, for example, it is generally preferable that a deceased person is
buried on the day of death and that the body is touched only by another Muslim. Cremation is not
allowed (Taylor and Box 1999). Within Judaism, death is generally viewed a natural occurrence
that requires acceptance. Like many other religions, the Jewish faith believes that the body must
return to the earth intact. Therefore, cremation is usually not permitted. In Buddhism, the body is
a sacred and spiritual whole; until recently, autopsies were not allowed. Buddhist funeral services
are to be conducted as soon as possible after the passing of an individual; these rituals are
intended to send the spirit from the body to the eternal spiritual realm (Taylor and Box 1999). In
most Christian denominations, burial and cremation are acceptable because the soul is believed to
have departed the body after death. The concept of passing from earthly life into spiritual peace is
considered to be a desirable transition from an imperfect existence. The resurrection of the Christ
figure is seen to represent the life cycle. In the spiritual beliefs of many indigenous people, there
is a significant emphasis on the natural cycle of the living world. Most indigenous cultures have
favoured burial in previous generations. Both the Aboriginal communities of Australia and the
Native American communities of the United States celebrate the symbolic stories of natural
creation and the spirits dwelling within nature that influence all facets of daily life. The
Indigenous people of Australia have a particularly complex and meaningful relationship with
ancestral spirits, which shapes their perceptions of death. The imagery and cultural practices of
Native Americans also involve a profound respect for the life cycle of the earth.
83
In 1901, ninety-eight percent of the Australian population had an affiliation with a Christian
denomination (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2003). During that time, the remaining two percent
were made up of Buddhists, Hindus and members of the Aboriginal community. By 2001,
however, just sixty-eight percent of people noted a Christian affiliation, while five percent cited
other religions such as Judaism, Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism. Sixteen percent of Australians
stated that they did not have a religion; this percentage has risen steadily since the early 1970s
(ibid.). Jalland describes Australia as a secular society that tends to privatise dying and grieving
[and] minimise rituals (2006: 4). In the United States, about eighty-three percent of people
aligned themselves with one of the Christian denominations, two percent of the population were
Jewish and six percent of the population were members of another religious faith (United States
Census 1999). About eight percent of the population stated that they had no religion. These
numbers may not be entirely accurate, as federal law in the United States prohibits the mandatory
collection of this information.
9
Following the terrorist bombing in Bali in October 2002, there were public observances in
stadiums and parks across Australia. (These venues were selected partly because many of the
Australian victims were members of regional football clubs.) At a memorial event in the Domain,
a large park in Sydney, performers dressed like angels walked through the crowds as music
played on large speakers. This presentation seemed more akin to the opening ceremony of the
Olympics than to a traditional memorial service. One attendee described the location of the event
by saying, The Domain is our cathedral (Jopson and Bradley 2002).
10
This companys standard procedure is to purchase family-owned funeral homes and keep the
original name, thereby preserving the illusion that healthy competition exists between locally
owned businesses. Service Corporation Internationals anti-competitive business strategies are
difficult to detect because the company does not place its insignia anywhere within its funeral
homes (Mitford 2000).
11
For example, a company called Everest Funerals allows clients to ring for a funeral planning
meeting. The consultant then helps the bereaved plan a funeral service, select a casket, cemetery
or crematorium and notify relevant organisations. The consultant supposedly elicits the best price
for the various services associated with death; he/she also discusses a wish list with the client, so
that if there is a memorial service, the clients expectations are met.
12
In writing about new technologies at the beginning of the 1990s, Denzin does not yet anticipate
the internet. Drawing upon the work of Baudrillard, Denzin says that the ubiquitous technologies
of the late twentieth century create an ecstasy of communication which delights in the spectacle
itself and finds pleasure in the pornography of excess that flows from the medias desire to tell
everything (1991: 8). His point seems very prescient in light of the profound influence of the
internet on contemporary life.
13
Gender and age are significant variables in relation to empathy. Women and the elderly tend to
be more sensitive to the distress of other people; they place themselves in the victims
circumstances more easily and register a stronger desire to help. Men are more likely to find a
justification for the victims situation, thereby reducing the need for empathy (Hijer 2004).
14
On average, young people process ten million advertisements before they are 18 years old
(Kearl 1995). These messages tell adolescents that coolness is a way of fitting in with their peers.
Coolness is depicted in advertisements for clothes, shoes, personal care products and music.
These images often depict "youths hanging out on street corners...hurling insults, blocking our
way, daring us to pass" (Harris, 1999: 40). The process of commercialising cool - a global
marketing effort which affects even those genuinely immersed in the dangerous situations that
engender coolness - places a price tag on individual identity, on becoming someone with style and
presence, someone who stands out from the crowd. In this way, companies create trends, exploit
them and move on to the next new thing. Coolness is, by definition, elusive: once a particular
entity is deemed cool, it is mass-produced and then is no longer desirable. In this sense, there is a
kind of nihilism associated with coolness (Harris 1999).
15
The popularity of The Darwin Awards is evidenced by thousands of references on websites, a
feature film, calendars and books. Northcutt (2000) has written four volumes in an expanding
series that details these awards. Key websites include <www.darwinawards.com> and
<www.officialdarwinawards.com>
84
16
The Darwin Awards do not promulgate a scientifically accurate version of Darwins theory of
evolution; they attribute the phrase survival of the fittest to Darwin, although this was coined by
Henry Spencer.
17
The black humour in this scene exists solely for participants engaged with the text; the
characters do not perceive these situations as funny. In the following two chapters, I look further
at differences between the characters and participants perceptions of black humour in particular
texts.
85
In the preceding chapters I provide a context for the analysis of black humour in
the late twentieth century. In this chapter, and the one to follow, I analyse black
humour using the concepts of structure and function. These interconnected
notions which relate to how comedy is constructed and what effects it creates
underpin much of the work in contemporary humour studies research. Palmer
(1994) devotes a chapter to each of these concepts in Taking Humour Seriously.
Numerous other scholars including Boskin (1997c), Carroll (1991), Davis
(2003), Nelson (1990) and Winston (1972) work with the concepts of structure
and/or function in connection with their selected comic examples.
This chapter works with both the concept of structure in black comedy and with
actual black comic texts of the late twentieth century. Throughout this discussion,
86
I interweave humour research and comic texts to illustrate my key points about
structure.1 In the first section below, I consider the broad concept of humour in
relation to the notion of structure. In the second section, I discuss the
development of the incongruity theory of humour. The placement of incongruity
as the first theory discussed in this thesis reflects my view that it is the most
influential of the three concepts in relation to black comedy. Every example of
black comedy, both within this thesis and in my general research experience,
contains some element of incongruity. Through laughter, participants approach
and retreat from death in surprising, disturbing ways.
I recognise that these section and chapter divisions form useful, but not
impermeable, categories through which to develop a deeper understanding of
black humour. In creating these divisions, I am aware that the notion of structure
is linked to the idea of function. Thus, I make a distinction between these parts of
the thesis in order to enhance the clarity of analysis rather than to erect a barrier
between complementary concepts. As Nelson sees it, the relation between all
three main theories is best described as one of overlap, rather than mutual
exclusion (1990: 7). In Chapter 5, I discuss the areas of intersection between the
incongruity, catharsis and superiority theories of humour. Each of these theories
foregrounds a different, yet interdependent, aspect of the experience of black
humour. I believe that all three theories are critical to an overall understanding of
the phenomenon.
87
The title of this section, It Hit Me, relates to a commonly used phrase to denote
both the sensation of getting humour and to the structure of comic material.
When people speak of the moment in which they understand and respond to
humour, they often say that the joke hit them. Amongst writers and performers
of comedy, a punchline is said to slay, kill, or knock over the participants.
Thus, the structure of comedy produces the impression of an impact or
impingement. Thus, the concept of impact informs the thematic divisions of the
subsequent sections in this chapter; these sections revolve around the idea of
collisions, reversals and repetitions.
88
In this thesis, the second meaning of the term structure pertains to the
institutions, practices and beliefs of individuals within a social group. The
cultural, political and/or religious activities of a particular group shape
expectations and interpretations of behaviour. For instance, religious services are
predominantly serious rituals in most cultures; these events are generally devoid
of sarcastic or demeaning remarks. The intrusion of rude comments in that
context seems incongruous and therefore may be perceived as funny, offensive,
or both. This meaning of the word structure therefore points to the restraints
and allowances operating within and between social groups.
Along these lines, Waugh (1984) articulates how the process of reading
contemporary texts involves participants awareness of established social norms
as well as their knowledge of other texts. Waugh (1984) suggests that seemingly
realistic situations (e.g. a day at the office, a family holiday dinner) serve as a
platform for comic experimentation. Without this sense of familiarity for
participants, the ensuing dislocations might be either totally meaningless or
utterly confusing (1984: 18). In The Lonesome West by Martin McDonagh
(1999), two adult brothers called Coleman and Valene live together in a modest
house in rural Ireland in the 1980s. The domestic setting of this play appears to
be quite conventional, like many other twentieth century stories of families on
the land. Yet in the first scene it becomes apparent that the brothers fight
constantly and ruthlessly, almost to the death. They insult each other and destroy
property. In addition, Coleman murders their father an act that Valene agrees
to conceal from the police. Following yet another violent showdown, in which
89
Valene and Coleman point weapons at each other, Valene reminds Coleman that
the local priests dying wish was for them to reconcile.
COLEMAN:
Well, did we ask [Father Welsh] to go betting his soul on us?
No Sure a fiver wouldve been overdoing it on us, much less
his soul. And whats wrong with fighting anyways? It does
show you care, fighting doesDont you like a good fight?
VALENE:
I do like a good fight, the same as that. Although I dont like
having me dog murdered on me, and me fecking dad murdered
on me.
COLEMAN:
And Im sorry for your dog and dad, Valene. I am sorryThe
same goes for your stove and your poor figurines tooMaybe
we can glue some of them together. Do you still have the
superglue?
VALENE:
I do have me superglue, although I think the tops gone hard.
COLEMAN:
Aye, thats the trouble with superglue.
VALENE:
Ah, the house insurancell cover me figurines anyway
COLEMAN:
OhDo you remember a couple weeks ago you asked me did I
go stealing your insurance money and I said no, I paid it in for
you?...Pause. I didnt pay it in at all. I pocketed the lot of it,
pissed it up a wall.
Valene, seething, darts for the gun. Coleman dashes out through
the front door.
(McDonagh, 1999: 194-196)
Throughout this text, participants encounter a dark world of patricide and
attempted fratricide. The Lonesome West invites participants to make surprising,
disturbing connections that do not follow traditional patterns of behaviour. The
bucolic setting increases the sense of incongruity in the brothers actions. As
Waugh says, contemporary texts may rupture the conventional linguistic
90
contracts that certify and/or disguise orthodox social practices (1984: 12). In
addition, the multiple cultural references contained in contemporary texts force a
kind of momentary re-reading of previous texts; these references offer both
innovation and familiarity through [the] reworking and undermining of familiar
conventions (Waugh, 1984: 12).
Drawing on Waughs work, Mamber (1991) coins the term radical metacinema
to describe the way participants read a film text in the late twentieth century. He
believes this process involves the wholesale incorporation of source materials
from outside the created fictional work (1991: 79).2 Like Waugh, Mamber
highlights the self-consciousness of contemporary film; he demonstrates how
participants apply a range of shared social and cultural references to their
engagement with a film text. Mamber also shows how extensive, repetitive
cultural references become a form of parody.3
The concept of cultural references embedded in texts and the way these
references inform participants interpretations is relevant to the study of black
comedy. This thesis is predicated on the idea that all black comedy contains
some common elements, which stem from a shared social context. I discuss some
of these cultural references (e.g. funeral homes, hospitals, memorial services) in
connection with black comic texts. This analysis works to support my previous
assertion that black humour is both personal and social in nature.
91
92
Aristotle (1964) first describes a link between comedy and incongruity in his
Poetics. He notes that human expectations are often contradicted by experience.
The resulting sense of surprise, when it is not painful or threatening, is often
humorous. Aristotle (1984) also touches upon the notion of incongruity in The
Rhetoric, saying that the reversal of an expectation may be interpreted as funny.
In other words, participants hold a relatively stable set of expectations about a
particular issue, situation or group of people. Comedy presents information that
93
Yet the feeling of surprise is not necessarily enough to generate humour. Kant
suggests that comic material must have something in it capable of momentarily
deceiving us (1952, 54). Then, when our concerns and confusions dissolve, the
mind looks back in order to try it over again and thus [the mind is] put in
oscillation (ibid.). To summarise Kants view, participants make an effort to
understand the incongruities in the comic material and this process produces
94
fatigue but also affords recreation (Kant, 1952: 55). In addition, Kant
reasons, a shift in hypothesis in the opposite direction (from a positive
perspective towards a more serious one) may generate discomfort or frustration
rather than humour.
95
Bergson then points out that people make mistakes; they tend to be stubborn,
rigid and frail. These errors give the impression that a human being is like an
unreliable piece of equipment: the attitudes, gestures and movements of the
body are laughable in exact proportion as that body reminds us of a mere
machine (1956: 79). Bergson describes this comparison as something
mechanical encrusted on the living (1956: 84). According to this version of the
incongruity theory, participants understand humour by applying a conceptual
template to one or more elements within a situation, then evaluating the gaps
between the template and the actual situation. On this point, Bergson
demonstrates his concern with the possibilities and limitations of the human
form. He extends this observation about the rigidity of the body, saying that
humour arises any time a person gives us the impression of being a thing
(1956: 97). Thus, Bergson believes that humour emerges from the juxtaposition
between an ideal and an interpretation of reality. This explanation is focussed on
a conceptual structure that participants apply within a process of comparison.
96
Each of the scholars discussed above speaks to the role of incongruity in the
structure of comedy. Aristotle, Kant, Schopenhauer and Bergson are particularly
concerned with how comedy presents contradictions that are based on
participants preconceptions about individuals, groups and situations. In moving
through the possible meanings of these incongruities, participants may question
their existing attitudes and practices. This process of re-evaluation is part of the
complex experience of humour.
In the following sections, I revisit the ideas articulated by these scholars and
introduce the work of contemporary researchers. More specifically, I apply
different theorists concepts of structure to the phenomenon of black humour. I
also consider individual and societal expectations surrounding loss in relation to
black comic texts. I look at participants perceptions from a theoretical
standpoint, rather than analysing actual recorded responses to these elements
when performed on stage or screen. In this discussion, I am concerned with how
ideas, actions and emotions clash within the experience of black humour. In
97
In the screenplay for the film Fargo, a policewoman called Marge Gunderson
learns of a triple murder in her tiny hometown of Brainerd, Minnesota. Marge is
called out early in the morning, following a huge snowstorm, to investigate the
crime scene. After she assesses the locations of the three bodies one cop and
two civilians she summarises her perspective for her colleague, Lou.
MARGE:
Okay, so we got a trooper pulls someone over, we got a
shooting, and these folks drive by, we got a high-speed pursuit,
ends here, and this execution-type deal.
98
LOU:
Yah.
MARGE:
Id be very surprised if our suspect was from Brainerd.
LOU:
Yah.
(Coen and Coen, 1996: 42)
Because very few dramatic events occur in Brainerd, Marge assumes that the
killers have passed through town. This situation sets up the films first conceptual
collision: a rift between the perceived peacefulness of a small rural community
and the random gruesomeness of the homicides. The local police in Brainerd are
so unaccustomed to criminal investigations that they make ludicrous errors. Only
Marge has the insight to analyse the crime with rapid lucidity. In leading the
investigation, she asks her colleague to check the dead troopers ticket citation
book.
LOU:
Last vehicle he wrote in was a tan Ciera at 2:18am. Under
the plate number he put DLR I figure they stopped him or
shot him before he got a chance to finish fillin out the tag
numberSo, I got the state lookin for a tag startin DLR.
They dont got no match yet.
MARGE:
Im not sure I agree with you a hunnert percent on your
policework there, Lou.
LOU:
Yah?
MARGE:
Yah, I think that vehicle there probly had dealer plates. DLR?
LOU:
Oh. . . Geez.
(Coen and Coen, 1996: 45)
99
In another key scene, the two men who have perpetrated the murders get into an
argument. The more violent of the two men, Grimsrud, rarely speaks. His partner
in crime, Carl, talks incessantly. The contrast between the two men is both
chilling and terribly comic.
CARL:
You never been to Minneapolis?
GRIMSRUD:
No.
CARL:
Would it kill you to say something?
GRIMSRUD:
I did.
CARL:
No. First thing youve said in the last four hours. Thats a,
thats a fountain of conversation, man. Thats a geyser. I mean,
whoa, daddy, stand back, man. Shit, Im sitting here driving,
man, doin all the drivingand you cant say one fuckin thing
in the way of conversation.
Grimsrud smokes, gazing out the window.
Well, fuck it. I dont have to talk either, man. See how you like
it.
Carl looks at Grimsrud for a reaction.
100
Just total fuckin silence. Two can play at that game, smart
guy. Well just see how you like it.
He drives.
(Coen and Coen, 1996: 20)
The two men are hardened criminals, yet they both get upset about quite minor
issues, such as poor television reception or a bit of noise. The mens sensitivity
and impulsivity is strangely funny because they are like children. The criminals
become violent over tiny personal insults, yet take the lives of innocent people
without remorse. Carl jokes about a man he has just killed by saying, The last
guy who thought [I] was a jerk is dead now (1996: 88). This flagrant disregard
for social rules contributes to the black comedy in this scene, even though the
characters do not register any humour in their situation.
In a later scene, Carl returns from collecting ransom money for a botched
kidnapping. When he walks into the cabin where the two men have been hiding,
he sees that Grimsrud has murdered the kidnap victim: She started shrieking,
you know (Coen and Coen, 1996: 45). Carl ignores this event, even though the
dead body in the corner marks the sixth murder that he and Grimsrud have
committed in the past few days. Instead, Carl focuses on dividing the cash and
getting medical attention for the gunshot wound in his face. (This injury occurred
when he killed the man dropping off the ransom. Before dying, the man got off
one shot at Carl.) When Carl first greets Grimsrud, he points to his own face and
laughs: You should she zhe uzher guy! The one-way conversation that ensues
is obscured by Carls face wound, but the discussion involves a dispute over the
previously stolen vehicle, an Oldsmobile Ciera.
CARL:
Well, I gotta muddy. He is plunking down eight bank-wrapped
bundles on the table. All of it. All eighty gran. Forty for you,
forty for meAdiosh. You can have my truck. Im takin a
Sheira.
GRIMSRUD:
We split that.
101
CARL:
HOW THE FUCK DO WE SHPLIT A FUCKIN CAR? Ya
dummy! Widda fuckin chainsaw?...NO FUCKIN WAY!... I
WENTN GOT DA FUCKIN MONEY. I GET SHOT
FUCKIN PICKIN IT UP! I BEEN UP FOR THIRTYSHIKSH FUCKIN HOURZH. IM TAKIN THAT FUCKIN
CAR
Carl pulls out a gun.
ARE WE SHQUARE?
Grumsrud says nothing. Disgusted, Carl pockets the gun and
heads for the door.
Fuckin ash-hole...
Outside, Carl walks toward the car. Behind him we see the cabin
door opening. Grimsrud is bounding outholding an axe.
Grimsrud swings overhand, burying the axe in Carls neck.
(Coen and Coen, 1996:
100-101)
Although the community of Brainerd is overwhelmed by the bizarre violence that
strikes their town, Marge remains calm. The third interesting conceptual collision
in this text is between the mad, chaotic behaviour of the murderers and Marges
warm, sincere, balanced approach to her work. Despite the fact that she is several
months pregnant, Marge pursues each lead with energetic diligence. In the days
that follow the triple murder, Marge gathers further information and narrows in
on the two men who are responsible. While circling in her patrol car, she sees a
Ciera parked in front of an isolated cabin. She approaches on foot and sees
Grimsrud, who is in the process of putting Carls body through a wood-chipper
machine. Marge yells out Stop! Police! but Grimsrud does not hear her (105).
Finally the criminal sees Marge and starts running slowly through the deep snow.
Marge shoots and wounds Grimsrud in the leg, then apprehends him on her own.
Rather than displaying horror at what he has done, Marge seems bemused as she
drives Grimsrud to the police station.
102
MARGE:
I guess that was your accomplice in the woodchipper.
Grimsruds head bobs with the bumps in the road; otherwise he is
motionless, reactionless, scowling and gazing out.
And those three people in Brainerd.
No response. Marge, gazing forward, seems to be talking to
herself.
And for what? For a little bit a money Theres more to life
than a little money, you know.
She glances up in the rear-view mirror.
Dont you know that? And here ya are. . . and its a beautiful
day . . .
Grimsruds hollow eyes stare out.
Well. . . I just dont unnerstand it.
(Coen and Coen, 1996: 107)
While this scene may not seem particularly funny, it does indicate how the black
comedy works in other scenes within Fargo. Marges sincerity and equanimity
create a moving juxtaposition to Carl and Grimsruds anger and impulsivity. It is
as though Marge functions in a different plane of existence; she finds it nearly
impossible to comprehend how the criminals could be so destructive, both to
themselves and others.
This point about Marges sense of distance from the criminals relates to
Koestlers (1975) work on incongruity in humour. He applies the idea of
conceptual matrices, or planes of thought, to the process of perceiving humour.
Koestler theorises that peoples expectations of the world coalesce around
established points of reference (such as the social practices associated with
death). Participants then use these points of reference to make comparisons
between their expectations and the situations presented in a text. Koestler sees
these points of reference as associative contexts, which are like a web of
cognitive and emotional structures. The points of reference within these
103
104
In the final scene of the film, Marge and her husband Norm do precisely the
opposite of the situation described above. They take something that seems trivial
(in this case, a recognition given to one of Norms paintings) and treat it with
great reverence. This incongruity gives the scene a sweet, gentle comic quality.
NORM:
They announced it . . . Three-cent stamp.
MARGE:
Your mallard?
NORM:
Yah.
105
MARGE:
Norm, thats terrific!
Norm tries to suppress a smile of pleasure.
NORM:
Its just the three-cent Hautmans blue-wing teal got the
twenty-nine cent. People dont much use the three-cent.
MARGE:
Oh, for Petes of course they do! Every time they raise the
darned postage, people need the little stamps!
NORM:
Yah.
MARGE:
When theyre stuck with a bunch a the old ones.
NORM:
Yah, I guess.
MARGE:
Thats terrific. Im so proud a you, Norm.
(Coen and Coen, 1996:
110-1)
In comparison to the previous scene, this moment is full of peace and genuine
affection. Even the language these characters use creates a clear juxtaposition
from the previous scene with the two criminals, in which every second word was
an expletive. As Koestler notes, comic effects are produced by the sudden
clash of incompatible matrices (1975: 42). In Fargo, Marge Gundersons
perspective on life collides with that of the murderers and the man who plans the
original kidnapping. This experience causes Marge to consider the randomness of
death and the sickness of murder. Yet she concludes that, despite the temporary
invasion of terror, her world is alright. One of her final lines in the text is: Heck,
were doin pretty good, Norm (111).
106
humour in Six Feet Under emerges from the characters attempts to deal with the
constant presence of death. In one episode, an apprentice mortician called Arthur
is left in charge of the funeral home while the owners, brothers David and Nate
Fisher, are away. Arthur places the corpse of an extremely obese man on a
trestle, awaiting the arrival of an extra-large coffin. In the middle of the night, the
weight of the corpse overwhelms the trestle and the body falls to the floor. The
efforts of four people Arthur, two other members of the Fisher family and their
friend Russell are unsuccessful in lifting the corpse back onto the platform.
Dead weight is the hardest kind of weight to move, Arthur warns (2001-2005).
In their efforts to relocate the extremely heavy corpse, the Fishers and their
friends falter and drop the body on the floor again. Arthur then spends the early
hours of the morning reconstructing the deceased mans face, as the fall
dislocates his nose.
The dark comedy in this scene stems from the juxtaposition between the four
living bodies and the corpse. The characters strength and flexibility contrasts
with the immobility of the corpse (which, in turn, would have possessed these
qualities when the man was alive). This issue relates to Bergsons version of the
incongruity theory of humour, which says that participants make comparisons
between an actual body and an ideal template. When the body fails to operate
effectively, and it seems like an inadequate machine, participants may find the
situation funny. The laughable element, Bergson suggests, consists of a
certain mechanical inelasticity, just where one would expect to find the
wideawake adaptability and the living pliableness of a human being (1956: 6667). In this scene from Six Feet Under, the characters are aware of the problems
the corpse presents, but do not find the situation funny because they are under
considerable professional pressure; they must have the obese mans body fully
prepared for the open-casket funeral the following morning. Although the
characters take this situation seriously, participants may see it as comic because
the Fisher familys attempts to lift the corpse are awkward, uncomfortable and
ridiculous a kind of ghastly slapstick.
107
Another aspect of the comic incongruity in this scene grows out of the contrast
between the Fisher familys complacency and Russells shock. The Fishers are
accustomed to seeing dead bodies and hardly notice this nocturnal drama. They
calmly discuss different strategies for lifting the body as though it were a load of
potting soil. While they are debating what to do next, Russell stares blankly at
the crumpled corpse on the floor. Im starting to get a little freaked out now, he
mumbles (2001-2005). The stark difference in perspective between the Fisher
family and Russell evokes Koestlers concept of separate associative contexts. As
noted above, Koestler says that participants may experience humour when they
make a connection, or biosociation between two separate thought processes
(35). In relation to this scene, Russell conceives of the corpse within one plane of
thought (i.e. a frightening, foreign object), while the Fishers perceive it in
another (i.e. an object that they must prepare for display in their business). The
black humour in this scene grows through the contrast between the Fisher
familys tolerance of death and Russells squeamishness.
In another episode of Six Feet Under, the funeral home receives the body of a
baker who has died by accidentally cutting himself to pieces in a machine. When
Nate and David try to reconstruct the corpse for the funeral, they cannot find one
of the feet. The two men search their entire premises for the missing appendage.
David, speaking as though he is addressing a child, accuses his brother of losing
the foot while picking up the remains at the bakery. Come on now, Nate, is
there anywhere else you could have left it? (2001-2005).
This scene presents a juxtaposition between a very unusual item (a severed foot)
and the banal way in which David discusses it. By asking casually about the foot,
David treats an item that is normally sacred as an item that is trivial. The Fisher
brothers lack of respect for the dead bakers remains may seem incongruous,
even offensive, to participants. At the same time, this type of macabre
conversation is not unusual for these characters within the reality of the text. At
any particular time, the Fisher familys large old house contains many bodies and
pieces of machinery related to preparing corpses; it also holds boxes of ashes,
108
memorabilia from the deceased and the occasional severed limb. Thus,
participants who are familiar with the characters may perceive that, although
their actions and attitudes seem incongruous with that of society in general,
David and Nate are behaving in a manner that is consistent with their personal
and professional lives. In this way, the humorous narrative oscillates between
two frames of reference (Koestler, 1975: 38).
A severed foot is also a crucial plot element a black comic film called Funny
Bones (1995). At the beginning of the film, a man is killed when he falls off a
ship into the rotating propeller during a botched drug deal. Days later, the mans
severed foot washes up on the beach near an amusement park in Blackpool,
England. A little boy finds it, picks it up and brandishes it at local merrymakers.
The manager of the amusement park, Jim Minty, is worried about the effect of
this grisly incident on his business, so he tries to downplay the event to the press:
Its just a foot. Itll blow over. A one-off. (1995). Later, when another foot
washes up on the beach, Jim must confront the press again.
REPORTER 1:
I thought you said it was a one-off.
JIM:
Well, it is a one-off. The feet match. One person.
REPORTER 2:
Two feet, though.
JIM:
Well, obviously. Everyones got two feet. Does anyone know
anybody who hasnt got two feet?
ALL REPORTERS (in unison):
Yes!
(1995)
The reporters outwit the slippery Jim Minty by recognising that the dead man
does not, in fact, have two feet. This moment, which is indicative of much of the
wacky comedy in Funny Bones, shows how two contrasting worlds collide. The
severed feet disrupt the gleeful faade of the amusement park; they also reveal
109
the corruption of Blackpools police chief, who is involved in the drug ring. The
feet generate momentary black humour for a few people, including the reporters,
the little boy who finds the first foot and a young local vaudeville performer,
Jack Parker, who was a relative innocent in the drug deal. Other characters,
however, do not find the lopped limbs funny. These individuals tend to express
disgust, fear or grief. (The latter is strongly articulated by the dead mans family.)
Yet participants who engage with this scene may enjoy the juxtaposition between
an amusement park and a dismembered corpse. The feet are so out of context, so
disconnected from their original purpose within the body as a whole, that the
scene is brutally ridiculous.
The scenes discussed in this section show how diverse ideas about death collide
within black comedy. In these texts, characters articulate their various
perspectives on some of the common elements in black comedy: corpses,
funerals, homicide and grief. Not only are the characters views different from
one another, but their attitudes and practices are also at odds with social norms.
In Six Feet Under, David and Nate are amused by a fatal accident in which a
woman accidentally electrocutes herself in the bathtub with hair curlers. In
Fargo, Marge looks at the bodies of two murdered young people and says Aw,
geezOkay. Wheres the [dead] trooper? Her colleague answers that the third
body is up the road. Marge kneels near the corpses to let a wave of morning
sickness pass, then says Now Im hungry again. (1996: 42-3).
In many black comic texts, like those discussed here, death occurs in a
ridiculous manner and is never dignified (Winston, 1972: 283). As a result, the
characters approach to the loss of life is unconventional. Unlike most people in
contemporary society, these individuals are forced into a close relationship with
death. Rubin refers to this type of comic incongruity as a clash of modes
(1997: 43.) He also says that incongruity illuminates the shortcomings of both
modes (ibid.). In other words, black comedy allows participants to question the
information they receive. This type of material may raise controversial issues
about fate and the purpose of existence. Why are innocent people murdered?
110
When does death become routine? What is the meaning of life if no one misses
you when you are gone? Both Bergsons (1956) notion of a conceptual template
and Koestlers (1975) idea of associative contexts suggest that black comedy
invites participants to make comparisons between their personal death-related
beliefs and the perspectives and situations presented in a text. The collision
between these points of view that is, the areas where these concepts cause
friction and fracture has the potential to evoke black humour. As Winston
describes it, death is the ultimate disjunction in a [form of expression] that
dwells on violent incongruities (1972: 483).
Reversals
This section looks at another aspect of incongruity within black comedy: the
reversal of expectations. Within this structural theme, participants encounter
information about death that is the opposite of what they expect; there is a
switch, or inversion, of social rules about the loss of life. Participants are exposed
to surprising ideas, beliefs or behaviours that challenge convention and
manipulate stereotypes. The controversy surrounding these reversals may prompt
participants to consider the differences between the elements that have been
inverted. When participants judge the reversal to be interesting rather than
threatening, they tend to find it funny (Mulkay 1988).
In Richard Greenbergs play Three Days of Rain (1999), a wealthy young man
called Walker flees from New York to Europe. Even after he hears of his famous
fathers death, Walker does not communicate with his family and does not attend
111
the funeral. When he finally returns to New York, his only sister Nan is shocked
and angered at Walkers selfish behaviour. (This marks the second time Walker
has disappeared for a prolonged period.) Nan suddenly realises that a years
worth of worrying and grieving for her brother was unnecessary, even silly. The
brother she considered dead is now alive; the relationship she mourned must now
be resumed. This reversal is not funny to Nan, but Walker jokes about it
compulsively.
NAN:
I thought you were dead this time. . . I was certain of it, this
time
WALKER:
Im
NAN:
There were things to think of at the funeral other than your
absence, Walker. Did you ever consider us for a moment in the
last year? Do you have any idea what it was like? [We] hired
detectives. It cost us a fortune. We learned nothing. For such a
fuck-up youre incredibly gifted at getting lost. Where were
you?
WALKER:
Italy. Beat.
NAN:
Just Italy?
WALKER:
Yes, I know. Anything short of Jupiter must sound prosaic after
all youve been throughI know its the most obvious place
those detectives must have been quite second-rate; anyway,
well, Id been told nobody goes there anymore an enormous
lie, by the way so I decided to try it out
NAN:
You just walked out of your apartment you abandoned
WALKER:
It just happened[but] I did go to the cemetery Its nice
where [Dad] is, isnt it? Under that tree, right by the water. I
just sort of showed up with my rucksackId brought a
candle. Id decided to have a private ceremony. Luckily, it was
112
raining, the candle, the wick wouldnt light. So I just sat on that
big boulder by his grave, getting wet and chatting away like a
moron. The dead man said nothing. So like the living Now
[Im] here. Home to you.
NAN:
I could strangle you with my bare hands.
(Greenberg, 1999: 10-12,
italics in the original)
Later, on the same day, Nan discusses the situation with her lifelong friend, Pip.
Although Walker is clearly alive, these scenes reveal how his loved ones
perceive the instant reversal of fortune.
PIP:
Its the same thing all over again, Nan.
NAN:
I know.
PIP:
I mean, when Walker was gone, all I could remember was all
the great things about him which when you think about it is a
pretty meagre amount of material to be spread out over a year
NAN:
I yes
PIP:
Youd think returning from the dead would be characterimproving, but I mean: Look at him!
(Greenberg, 1999: 24)
It is difficult for Pip and Nan to understand and accept what has happened.
Without warning, the prodigal son, once presumed lost, is now found. Pip, who
had been worried about Walker for over a year, feels deceived. Neither Pip nor
Nan find the situation humorous, yet participants who engage with this text may
find it funny. Walkers Lazarus-like appearance in New York, in addition to his
attempts at conviviality, bring a farcical quality to the scene. Although farce is
not the focus of this thesis, Davis (2003) describes two key qualities of
contemporary farce that seem pertinent to these scenes from Three Days of Rain.
113
First, farce from the late twentieth-century tends to move towards existential
angst and bitter black humour (Davis, 2003: 16). Second, farce seems to turn
inward upon itself to examine its own theatricality (ibid.). The character of
Walker enacts both of these qualities when orchestrating his reversal of fortune.
Absent Friends takes place across two hours on a Sunday afternoon. Ayckbourn
makes stage time equal to real time, a technique which contains and intensifies
the play. This structure also has a natural, accessible quality that seems to invite
participants to connect with Colin as he relates his emotional journey. Before
Colin arrives, the friends reassure each other that Colin will avoid the subject of
death. I dont think hell want to talk about Carol...Hell want to forget says
Marge (Ayckbourn, 1975: 115). The characters speculate about other possible
topics of conversation, but remain concerned that death will be on the agenda. I
dont know what to say to him, groans John. I hate death. Gives me the creeps.
Dont talk about it. His wife Evelyn laughs at him. Death, death, death, she
taunts (ibid.).
Despite their stated fear of mortality, the hosts discuss death many times as they
prepare for the party. Marge comments upon the cause of Carols demise: Id
hate to drown. Pause. I dont mind anything else. Poison, hanging, shooting
thats never worried me but Id hate to drown. You look so awful afterwards
114
(Ayckbourn, 1975: 109). Other characters in this scene question the purpose of
the upcoming social gathering.
PAUL:
I cant see what good this is going to do for him. Coming round
here talking to us about it.
DIANA:
He probably wont want to.
PAUL:
Then what else is there to talk about? Its just embarrassing
isnt it? ...
JOHN:
As long as he doesnt start talking about death, I dont mind. If
he starts on about death or dying, Im off.
(Ayckbourn, 1975: 118-119)
Once he arrives and greets his friends, Colin immediately offers a complex
description of his grief, affirming both the joy of Carols existence and the
devastation her death invoked. Colin is the most balanced, articulate, peaceful
character in the play. He also shows an awareness of the boundaries of his grief.
[Just] because Ive been denied my own happiness, he states, I dont envy or
begrudge you yours (133). The other characters are shocked into silence.
Although Colin is not aware of it, they are all trapped in loveless marriages. He
therefore unwittingly highlights their unhappiness and denial. Did I say the
wrong thing? Colin wonders aloud (134).
115
Colins repetition of the word dead is natural to him, but it provokes the other
characters. John, in particular, feels highly uncomfortable. In these
circumstances, the word dead becomes like a punchline, creating comic
possibilities with each utterance.
The assembled friends, given an opportunity to discuss important life issues, are
unable to explore their emotions. His friends not only fail to comfort Colin, they
seem in need of therapy themselves. The characters unravel as they recognise the
contrast between their own unhappiness and the simple peace Colin has attained.
Colins openness is surprising; he seems at peace with his situation, partly
because of the meaning that grief has brought to his life. As discussed further
below, Bakhtins work on the medieval carnival offers insight on this point.
Bakhtin suggests that death is not the end of an individuals existence, but the
moment of spiritual release (1968).
The community events of the medieval carnivals were earthy and vigorous; they
involved food and alcohol, games, music, pranks and sensual gratification.
Bakhtins work emphasises both the fervour and the restraint involved in
carnivals. In medieval times, as in many contemporary celebrations around the
116
world, the carnivals were associated with the days before Lent (and in particular
Mardi Gras or Fat Tuesday); these events provided a temporary lifting of social
barriers. During the annual celebrations, people enacted roles that represented the
converse of their traditional positions in society. These events foreground the
low, the self-indulgent, the grotesque [and] the body in all its corporeality
(Palmer, 1994: 50). In these celebrations, two commonly reversed roles were the
king and the pauper. The villagers were allowed to elect their own king and
temporarily grant this person the privileges of royalty. At the conclusion of the
carnival, the person who had been acting as king was dethroned and beaten
[and] dressed as a clown; the game was then complete (Palmer, 1994: 130). For
this limited period, the world seemed topsy-turvy, a term Bakhtin borrows from
W.S. Gilbert, the famous nineteenth century British lyricist.
For Bakhtin, the medieval carnival is a powerful symbol of peoples full and rich
engagement with fundamental life experiences. He depicts the carnival as a time
when the body became engorged and the senses overwhelmed. Bakhtin describes
the verbal comedy of the medieval carnival as completely liberated speech that
ignores all norms, even those of elementary logic (Bakhtin, 1968: 422). This
short period involved a temporary fragmentation of established institutions. By
reversing positions of power, the carnival questioned established social norms
(Morson and Emerson 1990). Bakhtin notes that these symbolic changes in status
create the potential for humour. Overall, Bakhtins analysis of carnival reveals
the ways in which social roles may be reversed, reinstated and even strengthened
through comedy.
Louis Nowras play The Precious Woman (1981) demonstrates the concept of
social reversal in the context of black comedy. In the first scene, set in China in
1920, a fictional ruler called Governor Teng is mortally wounded by a gunshot
from his angry mistress. The Governor remains alive for a few hours, fading in
and out of consciousness. To quell rumours about his demise, government
officials decide to photograph him in official dress. Two of the Governors
servants are asked to prepare the body for photographs, but while doing so they
117
make fun of his limp, dying body. The servants are particularly irreverent
towards Governor Teng because he was a hated dictator.
SERVANT 1:
Hes damn heavy.
SERVANT 2:
Its like trying to dress an octopus.
They stare at him critically.
SERVANT 1:
Like a baby.
Although Governor Tengs eyes are open, he doesnt appear to be
aware of what is happening...Servant 2 moves his index finger over
his lips to make baby sounds.
SERVANT 2:
Itchie, kitchy koo . . .
SERVANT 1:
You stupid? What if he recovers? He might remember you
doing that.
SERVANT 2:
Hell never recover... Shit, I think he pissed himself.
SERVANT 1:
Just a little.
SERVANT 2:
I dont want to change him again. Grabbing a perfume bottle.
Spray this perfume on him, between his legs.
Chi Yu, a government official, enters.
CHI YU:
Smells like a brothel. Never mind. Strap him in the chair.
(Nowra, 1981: Sc.5)
In this scene, the servants actions invert the usual positions of power. Because
Governor Teng is comatose, the servants are able to toy with his body as though
it were a puppet. The servants exuberant, childlike teasing of the ruler is in sharp
118
contrast to their normal behavior towards him. This interaction illustrates the
notion of topsy-turvy in black humour. According to Bakhtin (1968), a sudden
reversal in social roles creates a comic contrast; this change serves to liberate
people and engender laughter and pleasure. In this scene from The Precious
Woman, the lowly gain precedence over the powerful, creating a reversal in
hierarchy. Instead of Governor Teng shouting orders at the servants, they
verbally taunt the dictator and physically manipulate his body.
Another disruption of the established social system occurs when the unconscious
Governor loses control of his bladder and urinates in his clothes. The servants
insult his masculinity by applying a womans perfume to his body. They refuse
to show respect to the Governor, which represents a complete turnaround. The
servants, as well as the participants who engage with this text, perceive that these
behaviours do not match social expectations. Thus, both the characters and
participants may find bleak humour in the scene.
As the play progresses, a photographer enters with the Governors wife, Su-Ling
Teng, and a government official called Chi Yu. These three work to capture a
dignified expression on Governor Tengs face.
PHOTOGRAPHER:
His eyes are rolling around too much.
CHI YU:
What will we do?
PHOTOGRAPHER:
Stand behind me and snap your fingers when I tell you. It
works with babies and geriatrics. All right . . . Now!
Teng looks in the direction of the noise; the photographer takes his
picture.
Again...
MRS. SU-LING TENG:
Hes never been treated like this.
119
CHI YU:
Be patient Mrs. Teng...
Teng smiles unconsciously at some inner joke.
PHOTOGRAPHER:
Do you want him like that?
CHI YU:
No, he should be earnest...Councilor Wa, just before the picture
is taken can you lean over and pinch him?
MRS. SU-LING TENG:
No, stop it. You cant treat him like this.
CHI YU:
We have to convince the rebels, Mrs. Teng.
MRS. SU-LING TENG:
...All right.
(Nowra, 1981: Sc. 5)
Chi-Yu and the photographer continue their routine of pinching the Governor
until all the necessary photographs have been taken. This scene, which ends with
Governor Tengs death, also disempowers the government officials and Su-Ling
Teng because they cannot control the situation.
120
Later in the play, Governor Tengs son takes control and proves to be a more
ruthless dictator than his father. The two servants return to their established roles
by serving the new Governor, who tightens the stranglehold on the countrys
working people. This return to absolute authority in is in keeping with Bakhtins
concept of the temporary nature of the carnival. In this play, the servants had
only a short-term license to tease the ruler of China. The government then
reasserts its power and enforces the social restrictions that people experienced
prior to the assassination of the first Governor. In relation to black comedy,
Bakhtins perspective on the carnival implies that humour may not be as
liberating as it seems. The conditions that facilitate social reversals, and in turn
humour, may represent a time-bound opportunity for participants to question
authority but may not instigate long-term social change.
121
him in a golf cart and shove him over a balcony. The corpse also appears to
dance, have sex and water ski. Weekend at Bernies makes no attempt at realism;
the corpse looks healthy after each episode of violent activity and is never
affected by rigor mortis.
The main source of black comedy in this text is the reversal between a live body
and a corpse.7 Dozens of people assume that Bernie is just busy, or perhaps in a
pensive mood, when they see him (that is, his dead body) propped up on a chair
near the pool. The comedy also stems from the unnatural flexibility and
movement of the corpse. Larry and Richard attach strings to Bernies sleeve,
thereby making it appear as though he is waving to passers-by. They also tie him
into a boat, giving the impression that hes steering around the lake. Another
form of reversal in this text is the way that Larry and Richard defile Bernies
corpse. Social mores around death would dictate that the men inform Bernies
relatives of his passing, respect the corpse and attend the memorial. Instead, the
mens self-interest exceeds their sense of duty to the deceased.
The orchestrated antics of the inert corpse represent the inverse of Bergsons
theory. Instead of something mechanical encrusted on the living, it is as
though something living is encrusted upon the dead (1956: 84). Bernies corpse
is not stiff and still; it is not at rest. Larry and Richard make the corpse seem
elastic and dynamic as it travels in various vehicles all over the estate. The
situations described above are shocking, but they are also in keeping with the
selfish desperation of the two young men. Their ambition is established in the
first scene, when Larry and Richard discuss how a visit to their boss mansion
might help their careers. In addition, the others characters are so focussed on
themselves that they do not register the fact that Bernie is decidedly out of sorts.
The dead man gag continues until the end of the film, leaving the option for an
even less plausible sequel. In short, Weekend at Bernies (1989) illustrates a
relatively common device in black comedy: a case of mistaken identity between
a corpse and a living body (Nelson 1990).
122
In Funny Bones (1995), the relatives of the deceased footless man return to
Blackpool and force Jack Parker to find the severed appendages. Jack obliges by
going to the morgue with his half brother Tommy, also a comic performer.
Tommy stays in the car as a lookout while Jack tiptoes through morgue,
searching through all the drawers of bodies. Tommy then sees a policeman enter
the morgue for a routine check of the premises, so Tommy slips into the morgue
to warn his brother. At that same moment, Jack yanks on a sticky drawer in the
morgue and it falls out, thus dropping the corpse into a standing position next to
him. As the corpse begins to topple, Jack grabs it and seems to waltz with it as he
tries to work the corpse back into the drawer. Tommy walks in and sees Jack
hugging the pale, grey corpse. Tommys eyes roll back in his head and he faints
on the icy floor. Jack goes to revive Tommy, then hears the policeman, so he
places Tommys limp body on top of the corpse and slides them both back into
the morgue cabinet. Jack then hides until the policeman leaves. When Tommy
regains consciousness and finds himself inside a drawer, face to face with a
corpse, he screams. This the only vocal sound in the entire scene.
This highly choreographed scene moves at a rapid pace, like an old vaudeville
routine. The physical flexibility of the actors creates a wonderful burlesque
quality. The dead body becomes almost lifelike when it falls out of the drawer
and appears to stand up. In contrast, the live body of Tommy seems dead after he
faints. This situation raises comic questions for the central character, Jack. What
do you do with a corpse that seems movable and active? How do you hide a live
person whose body is stiff? Funny Bones sets up a perfect reversal between dead
and live bodies. As noted above, this reversal relates to Bergsons theory of
incongruity, which says that humour emerges when a body seems as inflexible as
a machine. In the moment when Tommy faints and becomes unresponsive, his
body no longer seems fully human; it is more like a corpse. Yet at the same time,
the nearby corpse has been standing like a live person. Everything is the opposite
of what it should be.
123
Another comic element in this scene is the greyish-blue face of the corpse in
comparison with the red cheeks of the two men, Jack and Tommy. The skin tone
of the corpse is reminiscent of a performer engaged in mime, Japanese Kabuki
theatre, or perhaps a production of Brecht. In addition, the corpse is clearly
played by an actor, which adds another dimension to the comedy; the actor is a
live human being pretending to be a dead body, which seems like a live body. In
general, the presence of an actor playing a corpse within a text or production
makes death seem safe; it is obvious that the actor will be fine when the scene
ends. In this sense, the figure of the [dead or dying] actor becomes associated
with immortality (Nelson, 1990: 74).
Another form of reversal in black comedy occurs when dead bodies are
reconfigured as inanimate objects. Although this is not exactly a reversal, this
situation does represent an incongruous shift in the identity of a corpse. Nelson
describes this change in perspective by saying that the body, which should be
treated with reverence, is treated as an object (1990: 76). In Joe Ortons play
Loot (1993), two bank robbers try to hide their stolen funds in a coffin intended
for burial. Because there is actually a body in the casket (an older woman called
Mrs. McLeavy), the thieves have to quickly camouflage the corpse. Hal, one of
the bank robbers and also Mrs. McLeavys son, enlists the help of his mothers
former nurse, Fay, to wrap the displaced body in a plain mattress cover that is
tied with bandages. When a police investigator called Truscott arrives, the
thieves claim that the corpse is a sewing dummy.
TRUSCOTT:
You claim this object is awaiting transport to a carnival where
it will be used to demonstrate the continuity of British
needlework?
FAY:
Yes.
TRUSCOTT:
Sounds a reasonable explanation. Quite reasonable.
(Orton, 1993: 232)
124
This moment seems darkly comic because of the obvious gap between the
insight a police investigator should possess and the gullibility Truscott
demonstrates. As the scene continues, Truscott again misreads the situation. This
time, he finds the deceased womans artificial eye, which has fallen out onto the
floor. Mr. McLeavy (the deceased womans husband), who is a conspirator in
the bank robbery, tries to explain the wayward eye.
McLEAVY:
Its a marble.
TRUSCOTT:
No. Not a marble. It looks suspiciously to me like an eye...
McLEAVY:
Im not sure that it is an eye. I think its a marble which has
been trod on.
(Orton, 1993: 259)
By creating a new label for the eye, the characters reassign part of the corpse to
the inanimate world. In doing so, they dismiss the traditional notion of the
physical body as a sacred representation of the living person. The body becomes
no different than any other disposable item.
FAY:
As she attempts to carry the corpse.
Im not taking the head end Lovely shaped feet your mother
had. For a woman of her ageThese are good teeth. Are they
National Health?
125
HAL:
No, she bought them out of her winnings. She had some good
evenings at the table last yearThe underwear you can keep.
FAY:
Your mothers underclothes?
HAL:
All good stuff.
FAY:
I couldnt. Our sizes vary.
(Orton, 1993: 224-227)
This scene again relates to the idea of reversal: a human body becomes a thing
and a thing (i.e. a huge bag of money placed in a coffin) becomes like a body.
Mrs. McLeavys corpse is not afforded the dignity due to the deceased. Instead,
her body is seen as a treasure chest to be divided up, or looted, by those who
claim it. Hal also sees the corpse as a disruption to an otherwise clean, successful
robbery. Like the young men in Weekend at Bernies, the characters in Loot
ignore social conventions about death and focus only on their own welfare.
The two old men at the centre of the film Waking Ned Devine (1998) are also
focussed on their personal prosperity at a time of death. Jack OShea and
Michael OSullivan, lifelong friends who live in a tiny village on the Irish coast,
figure out that their neighbour Ned Devine has won the lottery. Ned has not been
seen for days, so Jack and Michael assume he is keeping quiet about the big win.
Jack takes a meal up to Ned and finds him sitting alone with the television
blaring. Ned is stone cold dead with a smile on his face and the winning lottery
ticket in his hand. Jack concocts a plan: he will pose as Ned in order to collect
the winnings. He enlists Michaels support, promising a share of the money.
To make the plan work, the two old friends need Neds corpse to look less
elated. Jack and Michael reason that, given Neds usual gravity, his frozen grin
might give away the secret. So, Jack decides to push Neds face into a more
126
sombre expression. The two old men stare at the dead body for a moment, then
Jack sits across the dead mans legs, preparing to reshape the corpse.
MICHAEL:
Is it necessary, Jackie?
JACK:
Well, its unnatural as it is, Michael.
Jack grabs Neds cheeks and pulls on them.
MICHAEL:
Take hold of his mouth. You wont get rid of a smile by
twistin his cheeks.
JACK:
Youre awful smart. Leave me in peace....
MICHAEL:
What expression were you thinking of?
JACK:
Be quiet, Im trying to
Neds false teeth suddenly pop out, due to manipulations of the
face.
MICHAEL:
Dear God! Here!...
He doesnt want to touch the teeth.
JACK:
Youre panicking me, man.
Jack gets tickled and begins to laugh; giggles give way to guffaws.
Michael remains serious.
MICHAEL:
Watch he doesnt bite again.
JACK:
Oh, shush!
Jack continues to laugh. He finally pops the teeth back in.
127
MICHAEL:
Nah, its not naturalIts in his eyes, Jackie.
Jack pulls Neds eyelids shut.
Aye.
They both nod with satisfaction.
(1998)
This scene contains a reversal between the dead mans natural expression and
the new, artificial one. This opposition creates black comedy, which Jack
perceives during the scene. His urge to laugh probably occurs in parallel with the
perceptions of participants who engage with this text. As Jack acknowledges the
ridiculous nature of the act he is undertaking, he continues to push and pull on
the corpses face. The scene becomes brutally surprising and silly, like a black
farce.
When a lottery inspector plans a trip to meet Ned Devine in person, Jack and
Michael have to admit the truth and request the assistance of every villager to
pull off the hoax. The townsfolk work together and Michael, who pretends to be
128
Ned, convinces the lottery inspector to hand over the cheque. Once the inspector
departs, Jack and Michael divide the winnings equally amongst all the villagers.
Davis notes that although the sense of dominance may switch back and forth
between the characters in a Reversal Farce, eventually justice prevails. The
structure forms the play-frame [for] the comic rebellion in the text (2003: 8).
Although the main characters in Loot and Waking Ned Devine are disrespectful
to the deceased, Bakhtin offers an alternate perspective on these actions. His
concept of the carnival encompasses a sense of the human being in a spiritual
context. Bakhtins idea of the body and in particular the dead body as it returns
to earthly matter is part of the continuation of humanity. In effect, this thinking
neutralises both the terror and importance of the corpse. For Bakhtin, death does
not represent the end of existence, but a meaningful transition. He argues that the
deterioration and death of the body are as important as its birth and development.
He sees the human body as the vibrant centre of an exploratory and celebratory
process which combines all of the natural aspects of human existence. Death is
the necessary link in the process of [human] growth and renewal (1968: 407).
In this sense, Bakhtin rejects any separation of bodily urges and cognitive
processes; this dichotomy categorises the actions of the body as secondary to
cognition. Bakhtin perceives each human being as integrated and independent of
the boundaries of physical body. He argues that our bodies are not the essence of
ourselves, but that the individual soul survives death and becomes part of a
communal spiritual entity.8 As a result, Bakhtin believes, an individual can
laugh at itself dying because it literally has nothing to lose (Morson and
Emerson, 1990: 226). In this manner, Bakhtins re-imagines death; he offers an
alternate perspective on what the loss of physical life means in a larger spiritual
context. He de-emphasises the finality of the physical body and reconfigures
death as natural, inevitable, liberating and eternal. Through death, the self
expands, rejoices, devours and disappears into the whole (Morson and
Emerson, 1990: 229).
129
SAFFRON:
Come on. Youve got something to tell Mum, havent you?
[GRAND]MOTHER:
No, you tell her, dear, youre better at these things. I dont
know why, but I have the feeling I might laugh [and] I do think
it would be rather inappropriate.
SAFFRON:
You tell her, Gran. Itll be all right.
[GRAND]MOTHER:
Edina, dear. Your father is dead.
Edina doesnt react.
SAFFRON:
Crying. Grandad has died Is that all you can do, all you can
say? What does that make you feel? And you can stop
smirking.
EDINA:
Upset, sweetheartI am upset, darling.
Tries to pull the right face.
SAFFRON:
Angrily. Mum! Just go back upstairs and dont come down
until youve really thought about it.
(Saunders, 1994: 31-32)
Edinas indifference to the loss of her father contradicts social expectations about
family relationships and grief. In addition, Edinas mother does not seem terribly
130
upset about the loss; she expresses concern that she may giggle about it on the
very day the death has occurred. Saffron, who is still a teenager, expresses a
more conventional sense of concern. She mourns her grandfathers death and
sends her mother to her room for bad behaviour. This inversion of mother and
daughter roles is a consistent theme throughout Absolutely Fabulous.
In another scene from the same text, Edina contemplates the meaning of her
fathers passing.
131
EDINA:
Snuffling. Ohwell, I suppose it had to hit me sooner or later,
darling, didnt it?
SAFFRON:
Yes.
EDINA:
Actually, darling, its made me think, you know.
SAFFRON:
Good.
EDINA:
I dont want to die! I mean, I dont want to die
SAFFRON:
Mum, we all die.
EDINA:
Yeah, well, I dont want to darling. Honestly when I think of
how much Ive invested in this body, in this life, darling. I
mean, Ive had the best of everything Ive been shaved,
plucked and moisturized, sweetie. This carcass aint croaking
or Ill sue.
(Saunders, 1994: 38-9)
Rather than mourning her father, Edina perseverates on her own mortality. She
whinges like a teenager and is unable to empathise with other characters. As in
the previous scenes, the black comedy in this interaction emerges from the
incongruity between Edinas conduct and general social expectations
surrounding the death of a parent.
132
necessarily generate, the black humour in these scenes. Participants know Edina
will do something awful; anticipating her offence may therefore enhance the
humour when she inevitably disregards social mores. In each of these scenes,
Edina becomes the butt of the joke. Her inability to face the realities of adulthood
makes her seem like an ill-disciplined child. This impression forms a sharp
contrast with Saffron, who organises the entire funeral in honour of her
grandfather.
On the morning of the funeral, Edina gets ragingly drunk with her best friend
Patsy. Arriving at the conclusion of her fathers burial service, Edina stumbles
across the cemetery and falls directly into the grave. Participants who engage
with this scene are likely to posses a general understanding of a graveside service
and carry that concept in their minds. People expect a middle-aged adult to attend
the burial rites of a parent with some degree of respect and sobriety. Instead,
Edina cavorts through the cemetery while her daughter solemnly weeps. In this
particular scene, Edinas fathers funeral masquerades as an ideal funeral; many
of the signifiers of a real funeral are present (i.e. a casket, mourners, a burial plot,
flowers and a priest), but other expected elements (such as Edinas grief) are
entirely absent. The incongruity between the ideal form of a funeral and Edinas
fathers service may lead participants to experience black humour through this
text.
Critchley (2002) echoes this point, saying that the experience of humour seems to
hinge upon both incongruity and congruity. In order for participants to perceive
humour, they need to understand the social forces contained within the comic
stimulus. Boskin describes this as a culture code which is made up of the
customs, symbols and experiences of the people (1997a: 19). This shared
knowledge forms the nexus of communal awareness which underpins the
perception of humour (ibid.). In relation to black humour in particular, people
living in a culture at a particular point in time are likely to share certain
experiences related to death. For example, people may have similar perceptions
of the level of respect appropriate to a religious funeral. They use these
133
In each of the scenes discussed in this section, the reversal of expectations is part
of the structure of the comic text and therefore part of the process of comparison
that leads to the experience of black humour.
Repetitions
In this section, I contend that incongruity in black comedy arises not only from
conceptual collisions and reversals, but also from repetitions. Bergson (1956)
highlights the importance of this concept by saying that the repetition of a
particular element (i.e. a word, phrase, or movement) is in conflict with natural
speech or behaviour and may therefore seem funny. Under normal
circumstances, people are able to adapt to changes in their environment. For
example, when an individual meets an obstacle (literal or metaphorical) in the
road ahead, he/she should change direction to avoid difficulty. Yet this person
may lack insight and flexibility, thereby causing a mishap.
Bergson believes that participants find this type of repetition funny because the
individual performing the actions displays minimal skill or judgment. Bergsons
perspective relates to the incongruity theory of humour because the repetitive
behaviour does not meet with expectations of natural adaptability. Yet this point
also fits with the superiority theory of humour because participants feel they
134
would not make the same mistakes as the individuals depicted in the text. (The
superiority theory of receives attention in the following chapter.)
Repetition creates the surreal black comedy in Groundhog Day (1993). This film
involves a cynical television weatherman called Phil Connors who finds he is
suddenly doomed to relive the same day ad infinitum. Once he experiences the
American tradition of Groundhog Day, on the second of February, Phil cannot go
forward in time. No matter what he does during that day, he finds himself back in
precisely the same circumstances the following morning. The humour emerges
from the contrast between each of the sequential, almost identical, scenes.
Although Phil chooses to do something slightly different each day, his decisions
have no effect the following morning when he encounters the same situation. Phil
is quite confused; his life feels maddeningly familiar, yet also surprisingly
unfamiliar.
The black comic aspects of the text emerge when Phil realises that he may never
move on to the third of February. The time warp is so distressing that Phil
decides to kill himself. He steals a car and drives off a cliff, stands in front of a
speeding truck and jumps off the bell tower of a building. He makes another half
dozen suicide attempts, yet after each incident he wakes up unharmed on the
morning of the same day. At first, Phil does not think his situation is at all
humorous; he is desperate to end his torment. Later, he begins to revel in his
135
violent actions because they lack the obvious consequences. Phils life becomes
like a Warner Brothers cartoon, where characters get into terrible accidents and
survive unscathed.
If Phil did not recover completely each day, the suicide attempts probably would
not be humorous. During the first suicide attempt, participants do not know that
Phil will be safe. When he awakes in precisely the same circumstances, however,
participants receive confirmation of the repetitive structure of Groundhog Day.
This circular pattern gives participants permission to enjoy the increasingly
creative ways in which Phil tries to die.
136
Theres also a sense of repetition in the overall structure of Groundhog Day. The
text creates energy not by following a traditional narrative structure where one
scene leads into another, but by forging an unusual dramatic arc through all the
repetitive scenes put together. Phil does not necessarily progress in his
understanding within each scene, but through a series of almost indistinguishable
scenes, he gains insight on his existence. This pattern gives Groundhog Day a
unique structure, like that of a normal human life.
This representation of the life cycle also relates to Bakhtins notion of carnival.
As noted previously, the medieval carnival gave people an opportunity to
temporarily alter their circumstances. They lost or gained authority and indulged
their senses. In many ways, these experiences mirror Phils attempts to accept his
fate. As he enacts all the possible variations in his monotonous day, Phil learns to
live in a more conscientious manner. Like the participants in medieval carnivals,
Phil resumes his previous life and finds all the inequalities and institutions of
power that existed before his surreal experience. By this point, however, Phil has
a greater capacity to deal with the challenges he faces.
137
door to the garage and pushes him (unnoticed) into a hanging position. Saved by
his family, Lane heads back to school where he is taunted by Roy and other
classmates. He contemplates suicide again while standing on the narrow railing
of a bridge over a road. Just before jumping, Lane sees his friend Charles, who
talks him out of suicide. Charles then pats Lane on the back for reassurance,
which knocks Lane off the bridge and into the bin of a giant rubbish truck.
In both these scenes, black humour arises from the fact that Lane does not intend
to commit suicide at the moment when his life is in danger. He makes inept
attempts at self-harm, then cannot get himself out of the situation. Because other
characters show concern for Lane, and counsel him about his persistently bleak
mood, they do not register the black humour in these scenes; only participants
potentially read the scenes in this way.
The repeated suicide attempts in the black comedy Harold and Maude (1971) are
different than those described in the preceding texts. In this film, an unusual and
lonely young man called Harold Chasen acts out a range of gruesome charades in
which he appears to have committed suicide but has not actually harmed himself
(except in the case of a staged hanging, through which he gives himself a sore
throat). Harold also appears to cut his wrists with a razor blade in the bathtub,
burn himself alive, chop off his head and shoot himself in the face. After the first
incident, Harold reveals to a psychiatrist that he does it because he wants to see
his mothers reaction to his supposed demise. (He can barely endure her cold
attempts to control his life.) Because Harold is completely safe after every
dramatic event, participants may laugh at his repeated and increasingly
complicated attempts to depict suicide.
Harold has another hobby besides creating images of his own death: attending
the funerals of strangers. He regularly sits alone in the back row and leaves
quietly in his black hearse. It is not until Harold befriends an old woman called
Maude, who has infectious energy and insight, that he begins to think about
138
living instead of dying. Without knowing that Harold owns a hearse, Maude
hijacks the vehicle and gives her new friend a lift in it.
139
A later scene in Harold and Maude presents another structural theme discussed
in this chapter: conceptual collisions. Harolds mother, Mrs. Chasen, invites a
young woman to visit Harold in the hopes of sparking a romantic relationship
between the two. Harold sees this as an opportunity to perform yet another mock
suicide stunt. Upon witnessing the violent act, which involves self-immolation,
Mrs. Chasen rolls her eyes in disgust and remains perfectly calm. In contrast, the
young woman collapses with fright. Mrs. Chasen sees the apparent suicide
dramas as part of her sons fascination with morbidity and desire for attention.
The young woman, however, does not have a context for Harolds actions and
believes they are real.
Thus, Harold and Maude (1971) contains each of the structural themes described
in this chapter collision, reversal and repetition often within the same scene
or in quick succession. Each of these aspects of structure relates to the notion of
incongruity in black humour. It seems as though people enjoy experimenting
with the gap between ideal and actual behaviours associated with death. In
essence, the structure of comedy makes it possible for people to speak of the
unspeakable at least for a limited period of time.
The notion of structure is crucial to black comedy. First, black comedy contains
literal structures, or patterns, related to the presentation of information about
death. These patterns involve three main parts: the set up of a situation, the
escalation of conflict, and the punch line or summary of the scene. Within this
structure, seemingly incompatible elements are juxtaposed against each other: a
living body is set against a corpse, a bereaved individual opposes an indifferent
one. The overarching structure described within the examples in this chapter
appears quite consistently within black comedy, as it does in comic writing in
general.
140
The three structural themes discussed in this chapter collisions, reversals and
repetitions - reveal the various ways in which information about death may be
communicated in a comic form. All three themes hinge on the incongruity theory
of humour. As discussed above, Koestlers (1975) work on incompatible
matrices relates to the idea of collisions, while Bakhtins (1968) analysis of the
medieval carnival conveys the notion of reversals. Bergsons (1956) concept of
an ideal template for human behaviour helps explain the theme of repetitions.
While this chapter focuses on the structures in black comedy, the next chapter
concentrates on the functions of black humour by investigating the catharsis and
141
142
Chapter 3 Endnotes
1
As noted previously, this thesis incorporates research on humour and death from a range of
scholars in difference time periods and disciplines. However, the black comic texts are all
selected from the latter third of the twentieth century and, in the case of a few examples, the
beginning of the twenty-first century.
2
Mamber develops the concept of radical metacinema from Waughs notion of radical
metafiction. For further discussion, see Waugh (1984) pages 1-20.
3
The issue of embedded cultural references is complex and could generate more extensive
discussion, but within the scope of this thesis I cannot explore additional critical writings on the
subject. As noted, I focus on shared cultural references associated with death.
4
Schopenhauer (1964) sees the creation of comedy, which he terms wit, as an intentional act.
He contrasts this with folly, which is unintentional, and involves a ludicrous mistake.
5
Koestler uses the terms associative contexts and matrices interchangeably. He does this to
avoid monotonous repetition of the word matrix (1975: 40).
6
Bakhtin originated his theory of carnival in the years prior to World War II and submitted the
work for his doctorate in 1941; the work was not published in English until 1965. Bakhtin
revisited his theoretical work in the latter 1960s and early 1970s and altered his position on some
key issues. These changes in perspective do not greatly influence his analysis of humour.
7
I do not contend that a corpse is automatically funny, nor that it is funnier than other elements
that commonly appear in comic material. I simply suggest that a dead body may be funny in
particular contexts. I argue that corpses create a different kind of funniness, - one which
involves simultaneous connection and disconnection to the deceased. (This point receives further
attention in subsequent chapters.)
8
Bakhtins own physical body he lost his right leg to a bone disease may have fuelled his
pre-occupation with the idea of a collective of souls. The trauma may have shaped his theory of
the imperfect body and the spiritual life he believed extended beyond the physical self (Morson
and Emerson 1990). Bakhtin seemed to find comfort in the belief that the physical body is made
new and whole by the continuing life cycle. (For further discussion of this facet of Bakhtins life,
see Morson and Emerson, 1990: 444 452.)
143
In this chapter on the functions of black humour, I consider issues related to how
participants connect with the characters and situations in a black comic text.
What changes do participants experience through black humour? Do these shifts
in attitude or behaviour endure? The discussion in this chapter focuses on the
processes through which black humour influences emotions and cognitions
associated with death. I examine these issues through two key theories of
humour: catharsis and superiority. Each of these perspectives speaks to the
complex ways in which black humour engrosses and challenges participants.
In the first section below, I work to define the notion of function in relation to
humour. This discussion canvasses the work of various researchers who have
contributed to current thinking in this area. I first touch upon Radcliffe-Browns
(1965) development of functionalism and how it pertains to the study of
humour. In the section that follows, I examine the work of scholars such as
Aristotle (1964a), Hobbes (1994), Schopenhauer (1964), Freud (1960) and
Bakhtin (1968) who originated or enhanced the catharsis and superiority
theories. I look at different aspects of the theories through the work of these
influential thinkers as well as through contemporary humour studies researchers
including Davies (1982, 1998), Lewis (1997) and Moran (1997) who have
questioned and augmented these key perspectives on humour.
144
The title of this section, It Moved Me, stems from a phrase used to describe the
process through which participants engage with, and are affected by, the
experience of humour. People may describe a comic text as provocative,
overwhelming or exhilarating; they may also convey the sense that they
relate to the text. Thus, the various functions of humour seem linked to the
process of engaging with characters, making connections and attempting to
understand the situations depicted in a text. In other words, the experience of
humour seems to involve being moved.
145
Scholars who study black humour draw upon both the catharsis and superiority
to help articulate the functions of this phenomenon. At the same time,
researchers acknowledge the ambiguities involved in identifying and describing
these functions (Lefcourt and Martin 1986, Lewis 1997, Moran 1997). Before
analysing the catharsis and superiority theories and applying these theories to
contemporary black comic texts, I touch on two broad issues associated with the
concept of function in humour research: the functionalist perspective and the
tendency towards the polarisation of functions.
146
147
148
149
care. They note that humour in a medical setting may reduce the power
imbalance between health service providers and patients, thereby facilitating the
interpersonal relationship between these individuals. Humour may also help
patients feel more comfortable and positive about their treatment, which may in
turn improve health outcomes.3 In this sense, Berger, Coulehan and Belling
diffuse the dichotomy between the psychobiological and psychosocial functions
of humour. They argue that humour makes an impression upon participants in
complicated and integrated ways. This type of research heralds a more unified
perspective in humour studies.
Another dichotomy in humour studies research exists between those who believe
comedy is fundamentally radical and those who think it is ultimately
conservative in nature. Writing in the mid-twentieth century, Feibleman argues
that comedy improves the truth of an ideal society by jesting at things which, in
the current society, have come to be taken too seriously (1964: 464). The role
of the comic text, Feibleman continues, is to criticize customs and institutions
which are no longer viable [as well as] those which are still effective (465).
From this perspective, comedy has a corrective, instructive function; it points out
the limitations of current attitudes and practices. In this sense, Feibleman
believes, comedy has an inherently revolutionary nature (472).
Cook (1964) takes the opposite view: that comedy is essentially a conservative
force. Cook believes that comedy provides approval, not disapproval, of present
society (1964: 494). Although it appears to criticise established institutions or
powerful individuals, comedy eventually reinforces the strength of these entities
because it depicts the rationalism of social norms (ibid). From this standpoint,
the purpose of a comic text is to provide a distraction, and perhaps to chide, but
not to overtly attack the society from which the text emerges.
Eidsvik (1991) makes this debate more complex by noting that one persons
challenging, radical joke is another persons boring, conservative jest. He points
out that in regions such as Eastern Europe, which have been defined by
150
151
Relieved of the burden of pity and fear: The Catharsis Theory of Humour
From a contemporary humour studies perspective, the catharsis theory is highly
significant in understanding the functions of humour. While Aristotle originated
the catharsis theory in relation to both comic and tragic material for
performance, Freud modified and expanded upon the concept of catharsis in
connection with comic material. In the latter decades of the twentieth century,
scholars have dissected and developed the catharsis theory; they have also
applied this concept to a myriad of research projects in the arts, social sciences
and biological sciences. 4 Some researchers (Nelson 1990, Berger 1998) devote
attention to Aristotles theory of catharsis and his explanation of how
participants engage with comic texts. Others (Horton 1991, Palmer 1994)
emphasise Freuds notion of catharsis and its account of participants emotional
involvement in the experience of humour. In the discussion below, I outline
Aristotelian and Freudian notions of catharsis, attempting to distinguish between
the two, where relevant. I then analyse contemporary black comic texts in light
of the catharsis theory.
Because Aristotles writings did not survive in their entirety, his work is both
complicated and enlightened by centuries of subsequent interpretation. A
considerable body of scholarship, particularly over the past half-century, focuses
on Aristotles descriptions of tragedy; considerably less is known about his
perceptions of comedy. In the Poetics, Aristotle (1964) discusses catharsis in
connection to tragedy. A more complete manuscript on comedy, probably
152
another part of the Poetics, did not survive intact. Many scholars believe that
Aristotle wrote the fragments of text known as the Tractatus Coislinianus.6
These writings, although incomplete, discuss the catharsis theory in relation to
comedy.
Through
many
interpretations
of
Aristotles
writings,
one
particular
153
This point links to another central aspect of Aristotles catharsis theory: the
"assertion of a social utility for drama" (Orgel, 1995: 141).7 Aristotle (1964)
argues that the strength of dramatic texts lies in their ability to awaken, release
and balance peoples passions. He conceives of catharsis as a remedy for natural
human weaknesses that, without mediation, could prove debilitating. Aristotle
believes that when participants purge excess tension through catharsis, they
achieve a more balanced emotional state a kind of equilibrium. Aristotles
theory of the social utility of drama is based upon his understanding of the
function of texts in peoples lives. Aristotle believes that the emotional benefits
of comedy and tragedy emerge through an individuals identification with
characters and issues presented in a text. As the characters engage with ideas and
emotions, participants feelings become aligned with those of the characters.
These emotions build in intensity until they almost overwhelm both the
characters and the participants. Aristotle views this emotional peak as an
undesirable and disproportionate state. Therefore, it is positive for both
characters and participants to release their excess emotions through the
resolution of the conflict depicted in the text. In Aristotles view, tragic or comic
material does not let our emotions remain enflamed within us, but calls them
forth and expels them; this process gives the emotions "moderate and harmless
exercise, thereby bringing [participants] nearer to the mean in their emotional
responses (Janko, 1987: 61).
Orgel (1995) points out that contemporary scholars tend to disagree about the
specifics of catharsis. Some scholars interpret Aristotles writings to mean that
154
catharsis cleanses emotions that are analogous to those enacted within the comic
or tragic material. In the case of tragedy, the purged emotions may be pity, envy
and fear (Cooper 1922, Halliwell 1987). Aristotle seems to espouse this view
when he writes, catharsis cures evil with evil(Janko, 1987: 60). Other
scholars argue that catharsis creates a broader effect, releasing a variety of
emotions that are associated with, but not identical to, the emotions portrayed in
the comic or tragic material. This perspective stems from Aristotles statement:
...through the arousal of pity and fear affecting the katharsis of such emotions
(Halliwell, 1987: 37). In relation to tragedy, this may relate emotions such as
anger, hatred and selfishness. Janko points out that Aristotle includes other
painful and disturbing emotions in various passages of the Poetics (1987: 83).
Both perspectives on catharsis lead to the same overall result: a process of
emotional cleansing for participants.
155
In the late fifteenth century, Aristotles writings were published in Latin, which
re-awakened interest in his theories. Scholars from different fields of study
examined and interpreted Aristotles work in the following centuries. In the early
twentieth century, Freud developed the notion of catharsis in relation to
individual and social phenomena. In Jokes and Their Relation to the
Unconscious, Freud (1960) focuses upon the role of catharsis in the creation and
appreciation of comedy. His theory of catharsis sets forth a process through
which individuals accrue emotional tension regarding important ideas and
experiences, most of which are inaccessible to the conscious mind. Freud argues
that by perceiving and enjoying humour, participants release accumulated energy
in ways that are both tangible (laughter, smiling) and intangible (psychological
relief). Furthermore, Freud believes that these expressions reveal repressed
thoughts and feelings that would not otherwise emerge into consciousness. Thus,
the process of creating and enjoying humour seems to disinhibit participants.
Freuds version of the catharsis theory of humour emphasises two issues not
directly addressed by Aristotle: intellectual stimulation and emotional repression.
First, Freud believes that part of the pleasure derived from the perception of
humour stems from intellectual activity. Jokes, puns, riddles and double
entendres require cerebral energy to decipher. Freud argues that this type of
comic material elicits pleasure through the cognitive challenges it presents.
Through verbal wit, seemingly unrelated elements are connected via surprising,
clever links. Freud describes this connection as part of a psychic economy in
which intellectual energy is the denomination.9 In this metaphor, participants
release excess cognitive energy when they perceive a short cut between two
points and thus no longer require the same mental effort make sense of the
information. Participants then release the excess energy through a physical
expression, such as a chuckle or smile. According to Freud, this response is in
proportion to the amount of energy released: the "yield of pleasure corresponds
to the psychical expenditure that is saved" (1960: 167).10
156
The differences between Freud and Aristotle, in regard to the catharsis theory,
inform broader questions around the functions of humour. To reiterate, Freud
(1960) conceptualises catharsis as a process that emerges from the participants
subconscious desire to obviate social norms. He believes that participants
157
Although neither the catharsis nor superiority theories were developed in relation
to black comedy, these influential concepts help explain the process of laughing
about death. In the discussion to follow, I apply these theories to contemporary
black comic texts. To further explore the functions of black humour, I divide the
remainder of the chapter into three thematic sections; the first two sections focus
on the catharsis theory, the third on the superiority theory. In these sections, I
consider how participants relate to black comedy. I use medical metaphors
including contusions, ruptures and dislocations to describe the ways in which
participants forge conceptual and emotional connections with characters in black
comedy. These metaphors also illustrate the ways in which the experience of
black humour influences participants. While I recognise the interrelatedness of
the issues discussed in each of these sections, the thematic divisions are intended
to help identify and articulate the functions of black humour.
As discussed in the previous chapter, there are two main ways in which
participants perceive black humour in a text. First, there are comic scenes in
which characters intentionally create and appreciate black comedy that
158
participants comprehend at the same point in the text. In this type of comic
moment, the site of the cathartic experience is located both within the characters
and within the participants. Second, there are scenes in which characters do not
find their situation funny, but participants do. In this situation, participants
engage with characters but do not follow the same cognitive and emotional line.
Thus, the site of catharsis is within the participants; they own the cathartic
experience.13
Aristotles (1964) theory of catharsis is more applicable to the first type of comic
moment, in which the emotions of characters and participants run in parallel. He
believes that emotional purgation occurs when both characters and participants
reach an analogous emotional peak, then release their tension through humour.
This theory works well when characters and participants follow similar
emotional trajectories through the text. Yet in the second type of comic moment,
participants and characters may not reach an emotional crescendo at the same
time, or one group may not perceive humour at all. When only one group
perceives black humour, only that group experiences catharsis. In these types of
comic moments, Aristotles parallel-processing model for catharsis does not
adequately explain the complexities of the experience of humour.
159
Beth Henleys play Crimes of the Heart (1982) contains both types of black
comic moments discussed in this section. In some scenes, the site of catharsis
exists simultaneously in characters and participants; in others, only the
participants perceive the black humour. The play follows the lives of the
McGrath sisters in rural Mississippi. In the first scene, Babe, the youngest of the
three sisters, has just been released on bail for the attempted murder of her
husband. This incident brings the middle sister, Meg, back to her hometown after
several years stint working on the west coast. Babes crime prompts the sisters
reunion and forces them to reevaluate their lives.
Prior to the point where the play commences, the three sisters endure a difficult
childhood: their mother commits suicide and their father deserts them. The eldest
sister, Lenny, stays in the family home and serves as full-time carer for their
ailing grandfather. When Old Granddaddy enters a deep coma from which he is
unlikely to recover, Lenny and Babe wonder how to tell the middle sister, Meg,
about his condition. Meg, who has returned home impoverished, announces that
she is going to visit the opinionated Old Granddaddy and tell him the truth about
160
her failures: And if he cant take it, and if it sends him into a coma, thats just
too damn bad! Suddenly, Lenny and Babe burst out laughing.
BABE:
Youre too late.
Babe laughs hysterically.
LENNY:
Oh, stop! Please!
Lenny continues laughing.
MEG:
What is it? Whats so funny?
BABE:
Still laughing. Its not Its not funny!
LENNY:
No, its not! Its not a bit funny!
MEG:
Well, what is it, then? What?
BABE:
Trying to calm down. Well, its just thatOld Granddaddy
he hes in a coma!
Babe and Lenny break up again.
MEG:
My God! Thats not funny!
BABE:
Calming down. I know, I know. For some reason, it just struck
us as funny.
LENNY:
Im sorry. Its its not funny. Its sad. Its very sad. Weve
been up all night long.
BABE:
Were really tired.
161
MEG:
Well, my God. How is he? Is he gonna live?
Babe and Lenny look at each other.
BABE:
They dont think so!
They both break up again.
LENNY:
I dont know why were laughing like this. Were just sick.
Were just awful!
(Henley, 1982: 84-85)
In this scene, Lenny allows the laughter to erupt; she embraces the
uncontrollable silliness of the scene. Following Megs defiant comment, Lenny
and Babe generate black comedy to dissipate their stress and anxiety.
Participants who engage with Crimes of the Heart may connect with the sisters
and follow their emotional arc through this scene, thereby releasing similar
emotions to those displayed by the characters. This interpretation of the scene
fits with Aristotles version of catharsis theory.
In other black comic scenes in this text, the characters do not find their situation
amusing, nor do they consciously use black comedy to address their concerns.
For example, at one point Meg asks Babe why she shot her husband. Babe
replies: I just didnt like his looks. (Henley, 1982: 14). Instead of condemning
her sister, Meg concurs: "I don't like his looks either.". Meg does not appear to
be making a joke; instead she voices acceptance of Babes actions, however
misguided. In relating this incident to Lenny, Meg adds: "There are plenty of
good sane reasons to shoot a person, and I'm sure Babe had one" (Henley, 1982:
14). When participants register black humour in this scene, their perceptions
diverge from those of the characters. Janko (1987) suggests that Aristotles
concept of analogous emotional processes in catharsis does not encompass this
type of comic moment.
162
In a subsequent scene, Babe tries to kill herself using the familys small gas
oven, but Meg comes home and rescues her. Still terrified that she will face a life
term in goal, Babe tries to hang herself from a bedroom light fixture. Her weight
pulls the fixture completely out of the ceiling. Babe then walks dejectedly down
the stairs with the rope still around her neck, trailing a chandelier and bits of
plaster. This bizarre moment may enable participants to release the tension they
developed surrounding Babes suicidal intentions. Participants may also replace
a solemn image with an absurd one; the idea of a woman attempting suicide is
supplanted with the vision of Babe, disappointed but decidedly safe, in her
sisters living room. When Meg interrogates Babe about why she tried to kill
herself twice in twenty-four hours, Babe simply replies: I dont know, Meg. Im
having a bad day (Henley, 1982: 100). This example illustrates a potential
discrepancy between the perceptions of participants and characters. Freuds
perspective on catharsis helps explains the black humour in the scene; he
contends that participants enjoy the opportunity to engage with a taboo subject
(in this case, death) within a protected context. Because Babe is safe with her
sisters nearby, participants have permission to laugh at her nave, inept attempts
at self-harm.
In the final scene of the play, the sisters reunite over Lennys belated birthday
cake. They look at photos in a family album and speak calmly about their
mothers suicide. In this interaction, the characters again use black comedy to
release the stress associated with their losses. Through engagement with Crimes
of the Heart, participants may perceive black humour in parallel with the
characters, but also may interpret black humour separately from the characters.
In Louis Nowras play Radiance (1993), the characters are active players in their
grief, using black comedy to examine their experiences of loss. This text features
three sisters, Indigenous Australians from Queensland, who generate black
comedy to help them manage the aftermath of their mothers death. The sisters
come together for the first time in several years to attend their mothers funeral.
The reunion forces the sisters to evaluate their relationships and carve out new
163
identities. They must also struggle with long-standing resentments and jealousies
stemming from the poverty in which they grew up and from which only one of
them has escaped. When the play begins, Mae, the middle sister, is exhausted
from her role as caregiver for her senile mother. Upon her mothers death, Mae
arranges a simple funeral and cremation and invites only her two absent sisters,
Cressy and Nona. The two women arrive in town the day of the funeral, bringing
with them memories and hopes associated with their family of origin.
Nona, the youngest of the three, initiates a discussion of her mothers death:
What did [mum] die in? When I die, I want to look a beautiful corpse. The sort
that turns every man into a necrophiliac (Nowra, 1993:
Following a chastisement from her more mature siblings, Nona asks: Where did
she die?...What were her last words?. Gurgle, gurgle replies Mae (ibid.).
Despite her weariness, Mae generates humour in this situation. This quip shows
Maes willingness to look at her mothers passing from a nontraditional
perspective; it also indicates that Mae sees the death as both horrible and natural.
Her use of black comedy seems to dissipate tension in this situation.
Later in the scene, the other two sisters joke about their mothers forthcoming
funeral. In dressing for the event, Cressy dons a distinguished hat and boasts:
Well kill em at the funeral (ibid.). Nona tries on a number of sexy dresses for
the service, hinting that she will feel better if she looks better. However, due to
hasty packing, Nona lacks the suitable undergarments for the service. Her
revealing attire distracts the Catholic priest who conducts the funeral. The
awkwardness of the funeral combines two tendentious subjects: sex and death.
Yet Mae, Cressy and Nona talk about these subjects in a way which is
surprisingly informal and direct. The scenes black humour arises not only from
the sisters open discussion of the restricted topics, but also from the
inappropriateness of the two topics together; this combination means that the
sisters violate more than one social rule simultaneously.14
164
Mae, Cressy and Nona are the sole participants in their mothers funeral. The
priest has little meaningful to say, as he hardly knows the deceased and he is
nervous around the provocative Nona. The church is nearly empty, there are no
memorial flowers or gifts and the guests have mixed feelings about the deceased.
These failings are not the sisters fault, but simply factors associated with the
fragmentation of their family and their mothers disengagement from the
community. As a result, the sisters take their mothers ashes back home and
create their own memorial - full of humour and affection - in the hours following
the church service. After a few glasses of wine and the recounting of childhood
stories, Nora raises the practical issue of their mothers remains.
NONA:
What should we do with mum?... Bringing out a vase. What
about this? We can see them... Come on, lets stick her in the
vase. She liked vases.
MAE:
Youre going to put her in there?
NONA:
No, too creepy. You or Cressy will do it.
CRESSY:
Why do you want to put her in there?
NONA:
Because, its so much better than the box. When we take her to
the island [to scatter her], think how good shell look.
(Nowra, 1993: Act I, Sc. 3)
165
The women argue about the proper place for the ashes, each grabbing at the
container. As they wrestle with it, they accidentally spill the contents all over
themselves and the floor. The three sisters are covered in ashes. There is a
stunned silence.
NONA:
Youve spilt mum on the floor...Oh my God, look what weve
done to mum...
She bursts into laughter.
MAE:
Weve scattered her.
CRESSY:
What are we going to do, shes everywhere?...Looking at her
dress. Im going to have to explain to the laundry: Thats no
stain, thats my mum.
They all burst into laughter, then stop.
NONA:
We cant leave her on the floor. We have to clean her up.
CRESSY:
We cant pick her up, its impossible
(Nowra, 1993: Act I, Sc. 3)
Finally, the three women agree to use a vacuum cleaner to gather the ashes. They
then deposit the contents of the vacuum cleaner bag into an empty licorice tin
labeled with the brand name Radiance. I bet you half mums ashes is lint and
dust, Nona complains. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust, responds Mae (ibid.).
The Radiance label on the tin is a symbol for the strength and warmth that
emanates from these women. As they talk through the night, both terrible and
wonderful stories emerge. Cressy eventually admits to being raped at age twelve
and giving birth to Nona (who was raised to believe Cressy was her older sister).
This revelation is horrific, but it opens up the possibility of renewal and
166
development in the relationship between the two sisters. As these stories unfold,
so do the womens skills for surviving loss. Black comedy serves as a unique
form of discourse; it is a method for dissipating anger, relinquishing grief and
reestablishing identities.
Faced with giving up their mothers old house (she was in debt to a dishonest
lover), and sensing their mothers ghostly presence, the sisters burn down the
house on the night of the funeral. They laugh triumphantly as it glows and
crumbles. The fire gives them control over their circumstances and justice
against their mothers oppressor. Through the twenty-four hour period depicted
in Radiance, the three women go through a process of self-examination and
rejuvenation. The characters use of black comedy is a key part of this process;
their jokes reveal a willingness to consider alternate perspectives on death. Both
Aristotles and Freuds versions of catharsis theory help explain how the
characters make peace with their losses by releasing the stress associated with
grief. The black humour in this text may assist participants to move through a
similar process.
TERESA:
[They] said, shes worse, youd better get up to the hospital. I
said, shes dead isnt she, you dont phone at three in the
167
Mary then recounts how Teresa rang her to report their mothers passing. Teresa
was nervous and suddenly blurted out: Guess what?! Mary dissects the
conversation in front of Teresa.
MARY:
There should be a set form. Like those books on wedding
etiquette. Sudden Death Etiquette. Lesson One. Breaking the
news. Phrases to avoid include: Guess what?
TERESA:
I was distraught, I wasnt thinking properly
MARY:
I thought youd won the lottery or something.
(Stephenson, 1997: 11)
168
In this scene, the characters acknowledge social rules surrounding death and
grief. They both have a sense of the ideal responses at the time of death and Mary
uses this information to create black comedy. This eases her own frustrations,
though not necessarily Teresas. (Teresa seems to feel more shamefaced than
amused.)
In these scenes from The Memory of Water, the characters intentionally create
black comedy to ameliorate their distress, but their efforts at humour are not
always appreciated by other characters. This makes the connection between
characters and participants more complex. Participants have to choose a character
with whom to identify; participants cannot simply follow the emotional line of all
the characters in the scene. If a participant relates to the sister who is creating
black comedy in that scene, then the participant may experience laughter and
catharsis. If a participant empathises entirely with the sister who is insulted, the
scene may not seem funny. Neither Aristotle nor Freud comment on this type of
comic moment in relation to catharsis theory, yet both versions of the theory state
that, when a participant connects with a character, that character serves as a
conduit for the experience of catharsis. Thus, the cathartic process is possible if a
participant engages with the character who enacts black comedy; this may occur
regardless of whether other characters register the humour in that scene. The
above examples from The Memory of Water reveal subtle influences on the site
of the cathartic experience.
169
pursue her own interests, Eva decides to jump out her kitchen window just
before a Christmas party at her home. While she is on the ledge, a well-meaning
friend guides her back down. Eva then tries to stab herself by running onto a
large kitchen knife protruding from a drawer. When this fails, Eva sticks her
head in the oven. She is about to turn on the gas when one of the party guests,
Jane, enters the kitchen and presumes Eva is cleaning the oven.
JANE:
Are you alright?...Now you sit down here. Dont you worry
about that oven now...No point damaging your health for an
oven, is there?... Never say Im not a good neighbour - shall I
have a go at it for you?
(Ayckbourn, 1979: Act 2)
Jane finds the cleaning substance and puts her own head in the oven to scrub. In
the process, she becomes blind to Evas needs. Still determined to kill herself,
Eva swallows a handful of sedatives. She drops the bottle, however, and loses
most of the pills down the kitchen sink. As she probes the drain with a utensil,
Janes husband Sidney enters. Unaware of Evas motivations, he quickly offers
to fix the problem.
SIDNEY:
Now then. Ill show you [what to do for a clogged drain].
Always useful to know. Paper?
He picks up Evas latest suicide note.
Nothing vital, is it . . .? Now then.
He glances curiously at it, then turns it over and starts to draw his
diagram on the back.
(Ayckbourn, 1979: Act 2)
While Sidney works on the blocked sink, Eva decides to hang herself. Unseen by
other characters, she ties herself to the kitchen light fixture and accidentally pulls
it out of the ceiling. Another party guest, Ronald, comes in and offers to repair
the damaged electrical connection, not realising Evas plight. Ronald shocks
himself and slumps unconscious on the floor. Finally, after five failed suicide
170
attempts, Eva gives up. The few sedatives she managed to swallow make her too
sleepy to concoct any further plans.
In this scene, the characters never acknowledge the potential for black humour.
They eventually realise Eva is suicidal, but they view the situation very seriously
and express concern about her well-being. Thus, participants may follow a
different emotional trajectory through this text. Participants are likely to accrue
tension in response to Evas desire to harm herself, but may subsequently feel a
sense of relief when they recognise that she is secure.15
171
The previous section demonstrates that a participant and a character may respond
differently to the same situation in a black comic text. This divergence implies
that participants do more than shadow the emotions of the characters. It seems as
though participants perceive black humour not only when their emotions
replicate those of the characters, but also when participants make unique
connections between their own experiences and those of the characters. In
relation to black comedy, participants may personalise the subject matter by
remembering their own bereavement. They may also generalise the death-related
subject matter, seeing the greater social implications of the losses depicted in the
172
text. In this sense, the experience of catharsis through black humour seems to
engage a variety of concepts and emotions related to death.
I have chosen the metaphor of ruptures to describe certain types of black comic
moments involving emotional identification. This term speaks to the pain that
black comedy calls forth, both for characters and participants. As discussed in
previous chapters, death intervenes in peoples lives, often without warning, and
causes rips and splits in the fabric of existence. Black comedy reminds us of
these traumatic ruptures, perhaps even reopens the wounds, yet it may also offer
an opportunity for cleansing and healing through catharsis. This section on
emotional identification in catharsis includes texts in which characters lives are
torn by terminal illness. By engaging with these dark comic moments,
participants may generate different feelings from those expressed by the
characters. In some cases, participants may not have direct experience with
terminal illness, but they may still perceive black humour in characters jokes.
This type of emotional identification in which participants seem to understand
the characters situation but may not react to it in the same way suggests that
catharsis involves more than a collinear emotional process. In making
connections with the characters, participants may recruit emotions that exist
around the text but are not depicted in it. Participants seem to do this by holding
various situations the ones in the text and the ones they understand or have
personally experienced in their minds simultaneously. It seems as though
catharsis gives participants the opportunity to see death within a larger context.
Margaret Edsons Wit (written as W;t) follows the life of a fictional literature
professor called Vivian Bearing who contracts terminal cancer.16 This illness
causes an irreversible rupture in Vivians life; it marks the end of her academic
career as well as the realisation that she will be alone in her death. In a series of
monologues and flashbacks, Vivian describes her oncology treatment as well as
her childhood, university years and teaching experiences. One of Vivians
strategies for coping with the radical change in her life is to create black comedy
about her condition.
173
VIVIAN:
Once I did the teaching. Now I am taught. This is much easier.
I just hold still and look cancerous. It requires less acting every
time.
(Edson, 1999: 37)
The journey from professor to patient is painful for Vivian, both physically and
emotionally. She expresses irritation when the medical staff ask How are you
feeling today? when she is obviously terminally ill. Im waiting for the
moment when someone asks me this question and Im dead, she remarks. Im
a little sorry Ill miss that (Edson, 1999: 5).
After a difficult round of tests, Vivian comments on her cancer treatment. Her
self-conscious comments reveal a keen awareness of the gravity of her illness.
VIVIAN:
My next line is supposed to be something like this: It is such a
relief to get back to my room after those infernal tests. This is
hardly true. It would be a relief to be a cheerleader on her way
to Daytona Beach for Spring Break. To get back to my room
after those infernal tests is just the next thing that happens.
(Edson, 1999: 53)
174
Vivian jokes about this situation to distract herself from the trauma of her
treatment, yet she also draws attention to herself as a participant in a challenging
scene from her own life. It is clear that Vivian devises black comedy for personal
purposes; no other characters hear her remarks. This bleak humour seems to help
Vivian cope with imminent death. The humour also enables Vivian to articulate
the loneliness that invades the closing scene of her life. As she faces the moment
of death, Vivian remarks that she can no longer narrate the play and has to defer
to the doctors, for whom she holds little regard. These are my last coherent
lines, she admits. Ill have to leave the action to the professionals (72). These
jests serve to minimise Vivians distress. She seems to experience catharsis
through black humour; this process appears to dissipate her fear and anger
regarding her fate. Nelson says that, when we laugh about our own death, the
laughter returns us to childishness, which brings with it a fresh perspective on
life (1990: 87). He adds that it is exciting to cast off, for awhile, our adult,
mature attitudes to these eternal human concerns. [This] temporary release leads
to a new acceptance (1990: 88).
175
the beginnings of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s in the United States. At the
centre of this intense play is young man called Prior who, like Vivian in W;t,
uses black comedy to banish the terror of terminal illness. When he discovers a
purple lesion on his arm, Prior quips that he has Lesionnaires Disease instead
of AIDS.
PRIOR:
Im a legionnaire. The Foreign Lesion. The American Lesion
LOUIS:
Stop.
PRIOR:
My troubles are lesion
LOUIS:
Will you please stop.
PRIOR:
Dont you think Im handling this well?
(Kushner, 1993: 21)
Priors sense of humour allows him to voice his resilience to his illness. Yet
other characters do not often laugh at Priors improvisations. (In this sense,
some of the comic moments in Angels in America are similar to The Memory of
Water. When there is disagreement between characters regarding black humour,
participants have to choose a character with whom to identify.)
As the disease progresses, Prior still cracks jokes, but there is a darker tone to
his list of symptoms. In the following scene, he gives a medical summary to
Emily, a nurse.
PRIOR:
[Im a] pharmaceutical miracle. Lazarus breathes again.
EMILY:
Looking good. What else?
176
PRIOR:
Ankles sore and swollen The nauseas mostly gone with the
little orange pillsMy eye doctors says everythings OK, for
now, my dentist says Yuck! when he sees my fuzzy tongue,
and now he wears little condoms on his thumb and
forefinger My glands are like walnuts, my weights holding
steady So, I guess Im doing OK. Except for of course Im
going nuts.
EMILY:
We ran the toxoplasmosis series and theres no indication
PRIOR:
I know, I know, but I feel like something terrifying is on its
wayI am generally known, where I am known, as one cool,
collected queen. And I am ruffled.
(Kushner, 1993: 97-8)
When his partner Louis leaves him, Prior is home alone throughout the process
of dying. On the night he dies, Prior sees an angel with huge silver wings burst
into his bedroom through the ceiling. The angel masks everything in bright light.
Prior takes in the spectacle and says: Very Steven Spielberg (Kushner, 1993:
118).
Prior generates black comedy from the time he becomes ill until the end of his
life. He intentionally uses this form of expression to try to close the ruptures that
AIDS creates in his life (e.g. his broken body, his lost relationships). Participants
may not relate directly to Priors losses, but may nonetheless experience
catharsis through their connection to this character. Participants may empathise
with Priors desire to push death away, to confirm the capabilities he possessed
before he became ill. They recognise the desperation and frustration Prior feels
when facing death at a young age. In this sense, participants responses to
Angels in America are shaped by Priors journey, but their feelings may not be
precisely the same as his.
177
ways to relate to these characters. Participants may connect with Prior and other
characters in Angels in America, then may experience and discharge their
emotions related to loss. Yet what is the nature of the emotional identification in
these scenes? Do participants feel precisely the same as Prior? It seems unlikely,
unless participants have personally experienced the same situation.18 By
engaging with the text, however, participants may evoke related emotions.
Freuds version of catharsis theory seems broad enough to explain these
variations within the process of catharsis. By contrast, a strict interpretation of
Aristotles version that catharsis involves the purgation of the same emotions
as depicted by the characters offers less flexibility.
The investigation of the functions of humour in this chapter leads to the third
influential theory of humour: superiority. The notion of superiority considers the
way individual participants feel about themselves in relation to others; it also
encompasses the way participants within social groups regard people from
different groups. More specifically, the superiority theory of humour suggests
that a statement, idea or action is funny when it inflates our perceptions of
178
ourselves and diminishes our view of others. Palmer describes this notion as the
inferiority of the real identity, meaning that people may attempt to cover or
enhance their sense of self by making themselves seem dominant over others
(1994: 102). The discussion of the superiority theory in this section follows the
approach taken above in the analysis of the catharsis theory.
The superiority theory of humour helps explain why most comic material is, to
differing degrees, caustic and critical in nature. This theory also provides insight
into why there is usually a butt, or victim, of a joke. By engaging with comedy,
people often glorify themselves and vilify others; they may also employ selfdeprecation. This relates to Palmers comment that comedy always involves
belittlement [and] may be used for egotistical purposes (1994: 103). In this way,
comedy serves to reinforce participants perceptions of themselves as discerning,
elevated individuals. In essence, the superiority theory says that participants
actively use comic material to support or enhance their perceptions of
themselves.
Although Aristotle (1964) does not specifically articulate the superiority theory,
he does state that comedy serves to educate participants by demonstrating how,
and how not, to act. By conforming to the models presented in a text, and by
releasing emotions through the process of catharsis, individuals who engage with
comedy become more like the ideal citizen: a balanced, rational human being
whose behaviour fits defined moral standards (Aristotle 1964). In general, Greek
comedy of the fourth century B.C.E. focuses on the fallibility of individuals in
the lower socioeconomic strata. The targets of this comedy are usually people
179
who are inept or uneducated rather than villainous. In this sense, Greek comedy
supports the social hierarchy of the time by depicting the superiority of the upper
classes. The comic drama of the Roman Empire also focuses on the adventures
of servants and others without privileges. In Roman comedy, however, slaves
often outwit their masters. Plays like Plautus (1971) Pseudolus and The
Menaechmus Twins show that intelligence is more important than birthright.
This emphasis on innate talent represents a shift away from the character types
of Greek comedy (Cohen 1997). In Roman comedy, laughter emerges from a
sense of superiority, but this perspective is based more upon the qualities of the
individual rather than his/her place in society.
Hobbes (1997) is credited with setting forth the superiority theory of humour
more than three centuries ago in Leviathan. Since then, contemporary humour
studies researchers, including Davies (1982) and Dundes (1987), have developed
the theory further and applied it to a range of projects. Currently, the superiority
theory attracts less analytical attention than either of the other two main theories
of humour: catharsis and incongruity (Palmer 1994). In this chapter, I attempt to
demonstrate that the superiority theory, although seemingly less complex than
the other two theories, offers insight into the phenomenon of black humour.
180
Baudelaire also advocates the superiority theory of humour, saying that laughter
is born of [humanitys] conception of [its] own superiority (1956: 117). He
believes that the perception of humour involves selfish attitudes toward other
human beings. By laughing at someone who has slipped on the footpath,
Baudelaire notes, people demonstrate a lack of concern for that persons welfare.
Even though they know the fallen individual may be injured, laughter burst[s]
forth from the spectator, sudden and irresistible (1956: 116). Baudelaire reasons
that in the mental attitude of the one who laughs, [there is] a certain
unconscious sense of pride (ibid.). It seems to be part of human nature to
document superiority over individuals who seem less capable.20 The superiority
theory holds that people purposefully erect and maintain a gap between
themselves and others because they enjoy the sense of security this disparity
provides. Furthermore, people may engage with comedy to reinforce this
division and create a clear, enduring hierarchy.
Although
Hobbes
and
Baudelaires
theoretical
observations
predate
In this section I suggest that participants use black comedy to assert their ability
to survive. Participants laugh at less fortunate individuals who succumb to death.
They also joke about death in order to minimise the power that their mortality
181
As discussed previously, one way in which people distance themselves from loss
is to make death seem specific and contingent (Bauman 1992). Although people
recognise the inevitability of death, many believe that they can play a role in the
timing and nature of that event. Because black comedy often involves mistakes
and ineptitude in relation to the physical body, participants are able to identify
the precise, and sometimes preventable, causes of death. In this sense, black
comedy is defensive; it reinforces participants perceptions of self-determination
and exorcises their general fear of mortality. Some examples of black comedy,
such as those discussed below, draw heavily upon a sense of superiority. In these
texts, participants are likely to feel more capable and cogent than the characters;
some participants may relish that sensation. Overall, the superiority theory of
humour points to an unflattering human motivation for the creation and
appreciation of black comedy.
182
in a chair near the front door on Christmas Eve, holding a gun. Eventually, he
falls asleep in this position. On Christmas morning, a young family friend called
Clive decides to leave the home due to embarrassment over his improprieties the
previous evening. Noticing a thick layer of snow just outside the window, Clive
dons a woolly balaclava and gloves. As he opens the front door to depart, Harvey
awakens and suddenly shoots Clive. The whole family rushes downstairs.
Bernard, citing his medical training, takes control of the situation.
BELINDA:
Is he alive, Bernard, that's what we want to know. Is he alive?
BERNARD:
Please would you stand back? Well clear. Thank you.
He examines Clive.
NEVILLE:
I'd better phone [the ambulance] anyway. Oh God, what's the
number?
RACHEL:
Well?
BERNARD:
I'm afraid this man is dead.
NEVILLE:
Oh dear heaven...
BERNARD:
I'm sorry.
He moves away. There is silence, then a moan from Clive.
NEVILLE:
No hes not [dead], hes still alive...
BERNARD:
Dear God, what a failure. I can't even get that right.
(Ayckbourn, 1982, scene 7)
In this scene, Clive's unexpected but welcome outcry allows participants to
release tension over what appeared to be a terrible situation. Yet the characters
183
do not laugh at this time; they are still shocked and concerned about Clives
possible injuries. Bernards propensity for misdiagnosis explains the otherwise
implausible scenario of a dead man coming back to life.
This point relates to the Darwin Awards, discussed in Chapter 2. The superiority
theory of humour implies that people laugh at the winners of these awards
because they cannot imagine killing themselves accidentally in such obtuse and
abasing ways. There is a sense of cruelty to the Darwin Awards; every death is
accompanied by a conceptual accusation, as though the victim is on trial for
imbecility after his/her demise. In order to perceive this as black humour,
participants have to suspend their concern for the families and friends of the
184
Nicky Silvers Raised in Captivity also involves a freak accidental death. In this
play, a young man called Sebastian returns home for the funeral of his mother.
Standing alone in a cemetery, he muses about the cause of his mothers passing.
A sense of superiority over death and corpses is also central to Bea Christian's
play Fred (2000) in which a young woman called Pam finds a dead man in her
back yard. The man is carrying no identification and is not missed by friends or
family members in the ensuing weeks. During the process of identifying the
body, Pam names the corpse Fred. This act signifies her refusal to
depersonalise the corpse. Instead, she endows the deceased man with qualities of
the living. He looks so lonely, so sadHe has kind eyes and [a] puzzled little
frown (Christian, 1998: 13). Conversely, Pams sister Monica dislocates herself
from the body. Monica visually dissects and critiques his physique and refuses to
call him by the name Fred.
185
PAM:
I think hes really handsome.
MONICA:
Well
PAM:
He is.
MONICA:
Yeah, but hes really short.
PAM:
ish.
MONICA:
Not ish He gets his nails manicuredTiny, ickle hands
(ibid.)
The other characters, including a police investigator and a doctor, perceive the
corpse as an object rather than a sacred entity. When they make degrading
comments about the deceased man, Pam insists that he was one of us
(Christian, 1998: 3). The other characters feel protected from loss by their youth,
health and success. Yet Pam reminds the other characters that death could just as
easily strike them at any time.
The police autopsy involves dividing the corpse into dozens of tiny parts. In this
manner, the body is destroyed twice: once by death and once after death. Since
no one comes forward to identify the man, the little bags of body parts are placed
in a coffin. Pam insists that her friends gather together to farewell Fred. These
characters debate whether a segmented corpse is a genuine representation of a
deceased individual.
BARRY:
I like the bags, somehow I feel closer to him than ever before.
MONICA:
Thats if hes in the bags
186
DR:
Of course he is; theyre meticulously labeled.
ANT:
Are you sure this is hygienic?...
MONICA:
Its probably someones laundry.
PAM:
He is so in the bags. He is. I looked.
DR:
You opened the bags of Fred?
ROD:
Oh for heavens sake what next.
PAM:
I had to, I had to see.
(Christian, 1998: 75-6)
Unlike the other characters in this scene, Pam refuses to feel superior to the dead
man because he was murdered and abandoned. Pams attempts to give the man
an identity are touching, yet comic in their futility.
This scene also illustrates how Pams friends use black comedy to define their
social group. They create the sense that they are witty, urbane and untouchable;
they do not allow themselves to become connected to Fred. As a result, Pam is
excluded and must quietly contemplate the meaning of this loss. She eventually
acknowledges that death can be untimely and anonymous. Yet Pams dedication
to Fred seems to reconstruct his death into a loss that is meaningfully mourned
by a stranger.
Comedy frequently raises issues that define social groups: attitudes towards
relationships, families, education, money, religion, food, alcohol/drugs, clothing,
bodily functions and sex. The comedy of a particular group addresses the
features of [that] value system (Palmer, 1994: 62). Davies (1982, 1998)
research looks specifically at how participants use comedy to define themselves
187
and the boundaries of their social groups.21 He believes that comic material
about a particular social group reveals a collective awareness of the
characteristics valued by that group. Drawing on Bergsons (1956) ideas about
the social censure associated with comedy, Davies shows how ridicule helps to
maintain group identity. He argues that members of a social group use comedy
to define their interests and to create a sense of superiority over other individuals
and groups. By mocking peripheral and ambiguous groups, [participants]
reduce ambiguity and clarify boundaries or at least make ambiguity appear less
frightening (Davies, 1982: 400). In this manner, comedy serves to reinforce the
beliefs, practices and institutions of the group that generates the material.
188
called Walter and Dude face the unexpected death of their close friend Donny.
The three mates, who have spent many years avoiding work and bowling
together, become unwittingly embroiled in a criminal scheme. Their
misadventures lead them to be ambushed in a car park by four angry nihilists.
Walter dispenses with the attackers, but the shock of watching hand-to-hand
combat gives Donny a fatal heart attack. Since Donny has no immediate family,
Walter and Dude must handle the funeral arrangements. They arrange a simple
cremation, then visit the mortuary to collect the ashes. In the austere office of the
funeral director, Walter and Dude negotiate the cost of services.
FUNERAL DIRECTOR:
I assume this will be credit card?
WALTER:
Clears his throat upon seeing the price. Points at one item on
the bill. What's this?
FUNERAL DIRECTOR:
That's for the urn.
WALTER:
Don't need it. We're scattering the ashes.
FUNERAL DIRECTOR:
Yes, so we were informed. However, we must transmit the
remains to you in a receptacle.
WALTER:
This is 180 dollars.
FUNERAL DIRECTOR:
It is our most modestly-priced receptacle.
WALTER:
180?
FUNERAL DIRECTOR:
They range up to 3000 dollars.
DUDE:
Can we rent it from you?
189
FUNERAL DIRECTOR:
Sir, this is a mortuary, not a rental house.
WALTER:
Look, just because we're bereaved doesn't make us saps!
FUNERAL DIRECTOR:
Sirs, please lower your voices.
DUDE:
Don't you have something else that we can put him in?
FUNERAL DIRECTOR:
That is our most modestly-priced receptacle.
WALTER:
Shouting. God dammit! Realising he is in a mortuary and
speaking more quietly. Is there a Ralphs [grocery store]
around here?
(Coen and Coen 1998)
In the next scene, Walter is in a car park holding a large coffee tin full of ashes.
His method of capturing Donny's remains from the avaricious funeral director is
not depicted, but Walter and Dude clearly operate at the periphery of mainstream
society. They do not have jobs and their only focus in life is bowling; they tend
to fail at almost everything except their pastime. In this manner, the scene
pinpoints the parameters of acceptability. In comparison to Dude and Walter,
participants may perceive themselves to be more enlightened, resourceful and
respectful than these characters. The participants sense of superiority may cause
them to laugh at the two misfits.22
After securing the ashes in the coffee tin, Walter and Dude travel to the seashore
in Southern California. There, Walter delivers a eulogy while Dude looks on in
silence.
Donny was a good bowler and a good man. He was one of us. He
was a man who enjoyed the outdoors and bowling... And so,
Theodora Donald Karobotsas, in accordance with what we think
your dying wishes might well have been, we commit your final
190
Following the eulogy, Walter attempts to scatter the ashes. A strong coastal wind
carries them backwards onto Dude. Covered from top to toe in remains, Dude
stares at Walter.
WALTER:
Oh shit. Dude, I'm sorry. God damn wind.
He tries to brush the ashes off Dude.
DUDE:
Dammit Walter, everything's a fuckin' travesty with you, man.
WALTER:
I'm sorry.
DUDE:
What was that shit [you said]?
WALTER:
Dude, I'm sorry.
They hug.
... Let's go bowling.
(Coen and Coen 1998)
Throughout The Big Lebowski, Walter and Dude seem feckless, almost
ridiculous. They cannot pull off a simple memorial service without a colossal
gaffe. Yet Walter and Dude do not intend to be disrespectful to the deceased;
191
they are simply caught in unfamiliar and difficult situations. Thus, participants
may distance themselves from the characters without feeling disdain for them.
Walter and Dude seem outlandish, inappropriate and pitiable, yet also
sympathetic. This multifaceted relationship between participants and characters
suggests that black comedy often involves more than a sense of superiority.
Participants may feel better than the characters, but may also understand and
respond to the text in other ways. Thus, I believe that each of the three theories of
humour resonates strongly with black comedy. (This point is discussed in the
following chapter.)
As in The Big Lebowski, the characters in Last Orders (2001) are likable but
fairly incapable when asked to memorialise a departed friend. In this film, three
old men from South London drive to Margate Pier to scatter the ashes of their
lifelong friend, Jack. After driving and reminiscing for hours, Ray, Vic and
Lenny arrive at the pier and climb out of the car with the box of remains. In their
nervousness and inebriation, they fail to notice the strong sea breezes. The ashes
are blown backwards onto them, sticking to their clothes, skin and hair. Despite
their best intentions, these characters like the bowling buddies in The Big
Lebowski and the sisters in Radiance make a mess of their loved ones final
request. Participants may feel superior to the characters in Last Orders because
the old mens haphazard attempts at reverence seem inadequate. This perception
of superiority contributes to a dislocation, or divide, between the participants and
the characters. Yet in the moments after the ashes are dispersed, the men realise
their mistake and laugh at the absurdity of the situation. In this part of the scene,
participants may feel a sense of relief, in parallel with the characters, as both
groups recognise the black humour.
The superiority theory of humour is also relevant to the analysis of other black
comic texts discussed in this thesis. The sisters in Crimes of the Heart and
Radiance, with the exception of Cressy, are amusing partly because they are
nave. In Pulp Fiction (Tarantino 1994), Vince is funny because his dim wit gets
him into continuous trouble. Eva in Absurd Person Singular (Ayckbourn 1975)
192
and Lane in Better Off Dead (1985) are too inept to take their own lives.
Participants may see themselves as more skilled and less vulnerable than these
characters; participants may therefore feel empowered to laugh at the
misfortunes of others. The texts discussed in this section illustrate that black
comedy is variable and complex; it does not operate in a single dimension. In
relation to this phenomenon, the three theories of humour may be best
understood in concert rather than in isolation.
Both the catharsis and superiority theories of humour help explain how
characters in a text, as well as participants who engage with that text, use black
comedy as a technique for coping with death. These two theories also reveal the
ways in which the experience of black humour moulds, enhances and disrupts
peoples relationships.
The catharsis theory helps articulate how black humour reduces emotional
tension, both for participants and characters. Although the site of the cathartic
experience is an issue for interpretation, it seems that participants and characters
may experience black humour either separately or simultaneously. In this sense,
the participants responses to black comedy are not yoked to the responses of the
characters. This point is also relevant to the issue of emotional identification in
catharsis. When engaging with a black comic text, participants may recruit
emotions that are very similar to those depicted by the characters. However,
participants may also bring a range of experiences, ideas and emotions to the
text. These personal and social histories enable participants to connect to the
characters through emotions that are analogous, but not necessarily identical, to
those enacted in the text.
The superiority theory reveals how black humour heightens participants selfregard by critiquing the behaviour of others. The sense of superiority that black
comedy produces may make participants feel impervious to death. As noted
193
previously, black comedy tends to make death seem specific and contingent
because the deceased are presented as stupid or unsophisticated. Another aspect
of the superiority theory emerges in how characters use black comedy to mock
death itself. For participants, this function of black humour is less about feeling
better than other individuals and more about feeling superior to fate, God or
some other representation of the cosmos. Through black humour, both characters
and participants assert their courage in the face of mortality.
194
Chapter 4 Endnotes
1
Radcliffe-Browns (1965) work demonstrates that individuals within these particular social
groups form special connections called joking relationships; this refers to a time-limited but
intense social familiarity. These joking relationships permit unusual communication including
but not limited to bold personal statements, bodily functions and sexualised physical actions as
part of accepted cultural practice.
2
The breadth and complexity of the debate on functionalism, and the field of social theory more
generally, is beyond the scope of this thesis. This brief discussion is intended to highlight the
influence of the functionalist school of thought without distracting from the main issues in this
chapter.
3
Berger, Coulehan and Belling (2004) do not attempt to measure health outcomes in a
quantitative manner, but instead provide qualitative descriptions and guidelines for the types of
humour that emerge from interactions between health care providers and patients. The
researchers emphasise that comic material created within a medical setting should focus on
connecting with, rather than avoiding, issues that are difficult for the patient.
4
Humour studies research on the catharsis theory is so extensive that it is not possible to canvass
that body of work thoroughly in this chapter. As noted, my focus is the functions of black
humour.
5
Although the dramatists of Ancient Greece transcribed their texts, Aristotle and his
contemporaries received drama almost entirely through stage performance. As discussed in
Chapter 1 (see especially references to Susan Bennett) contemporary scholars use the notion of
text to refer to written works as well as performances of written or unwritten works.
Participants read written texts as well as live and recorded texts. In this thesis, I analyse written
texts intended for performance. I recognise that there are important differences between the
written and performed works, yet I assume that both offer an opportunity for significant
emotional connections. The differences between these experiences are not the focus of this
thesis.
6
Although some scholars (Ford 1995) express caution about interpreting Aristotles ideas about
comedy and catharsis given only a short segment of writing, other scholars argue that the
fragments in the Tractatus Coislinianus are entirely compatible with the Poetics and therefore
offer a convincing version of Aristotles views (Cooper 1922, Janko 1987).
7
Aristotles view that comedy and tragedy have a clear purpose directly refutes Platos belief
that drama is unrealistic and non-rational (Janko 1987). Plato believes that drama appeals to the
expressive, instinctual elements of human experience instead of the intellectual aspects, which he
values highly.
8
Jankos translation utilises brackets to indicate potential replacements for words missing from
the treatise.
9
I use Freuds notion of psychic economy in a metaphorical, psychological sense as opposed to
a literal, physiological sense. In this thesis, I do not enter the debate about how, or whether, to
measure physical changes that may occur during laughter. Instead, I conceive of catharsis theory
as an influential and useful perspective in understanding black humour.
10
In this regard, Koestlers (1975) version of the incongruity theory, as discussed in the previous
chapter, is indebted to Freuds catharsis theory. Both concepts centre on the notion of the
conservation of mental energy through the experience of humour.
11
Freuds theoretical emphasis on repression was clearly shaped by the social structures of
Austrian society in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. The strict proprieties of the
Victorian era convinced Freud that the enjoyment of comedy originates in its capacity to evade
social rules. [Jokes] draw pleasure from a source which [an] obstacle has made inaccessible
(1960: 144). Freud believes that the relative force of the obstacle, or repression, is equal to the
amount of energy released upon the removal of this obstacle. Thus, the more controversial the
subject matter in a joke, the more exhilarating and hilarious it is.
12
It is anachronistic to seek the notion of the unconscious in Aristotles work because the
Ancient Greeks did not conceive of the human mind in this way. Aristotle describes a more
straightforward relationship between participants and their perceptions of the characters and
situations in a text.
195
13
A variation on this second type of comic moment occurs when the characters enjoy black
humour within the reality of the text, but participants do not find the situation funny. This creates
a bifurcation between participants and characters. In this type of scene, catharsis seems to occur
for the characters, but not the participants. I do not analyse this type of scene in this thesis
because the situation may stem from issues of performance rather than from qualities within the
style and structure of the text. As noted, the discussion of issues associated with the production
or performance of comic texts is beyond the scope of this thesis.
14
Both the incongruity and catharsis theories of humour apply to this scene from Radiance
(Nowra 1993). The subject matter contradicts social expectations about funerals, which may lead
to the perception of black humour. This humour then may help to release the characters and
participants stress. (As noted, the following chapter looks at areas of overlap between the three
main theories of humour.)
15
Freuds (1973) notion of the death instinct is relevant to the interpretation of black comedy
about attempted suicide. Freud argues that the death instinct is present in every vital process
and is characterised by an organisms desire to reestablish the inorganic [non-living] state
(1973: 140). Freud does not claim that death is the entire focus of life, only that the inevitability
of death informs and shapes human existence. He believes our awareness of death is inextricable
from our connection to life. Freud describes the death instinct as a kind of aggressiveness that
has been internalized (1973: 142). By this, Freud implies that individuals have a powerful
predisposition to enact their frustrations upon themselves. He argues that self-destructive
behaviour reveals an unconscious sense of guilt about continued survival (ibid). Although
individuals may recognise their own unhappiness and therefore contemplate suicide, they do not
necessarily realise the motivations behind their self-destructive thoughts. Freuds theory of the
death instinct, although it sheds light on the possible functions of black humour, is not as
influential as the catharsis theory.
16
The plays title seems to refer to Vivians area of expertise: the poetry of John Donne and his
acuity in working with the most confounding of human questions. In addition, the word wit
reflects Vivians need to keep mentally sharp while undergoing humiliating, excruciating cancer
treatments. Finally, the title highlights Vivians dark sense of humour, which she believes
mirrors Donnes comic tone in his sonnets. This humour leads Vivian to a sense of acceptance
regarding her death.
17
In 1999, the Ensemble Theatre in Sydney produced W;t with the actress Sandy Gore as Vivian.
In my informal interview with Ms. Gore (18 May 2000), she told me that a significant number of
terminally ill cancer patients and their families attended the production. Several of these
individuals spoke with her afterwards about what the play meant to them, and their loved ones, as
they attempted to cope with their illness and/or grief.
18
The notion of an analogous emotional connection is also relevant to Peter Nichols play A Day
in the Death of Joe Egg (1967) about a couple trying to cope with their severely disabled child.
The play is mentioned here because it was quite influential at the time of its premiere and
publication in 1967 (Hiley 1978). (The end of the 1960s coincides with the beginning of the time
period considered in this thesis.) The play is not discussed in detail in the thesis because it does
not involve a dead or dying individual, although it does involve attempted murder. In this play, a
school teacher called Brian and his wife Sheila develop peculiar patterns of behaviour that help
them cope with the strain of their daughter Joes disabilities: they create and perform comedy
routines, which are like old vaudeville stage shows. These private scripts focus upon Joes
delayed development and inadequate medical care. Brian and Sheila take on the voices of
numerous doctors and social workers who have interacted with Joe over the years. The parents
also create a fictional life for Joe outside her crippled existence. They write dialogue for her,
pretending that she is adventurous, rebellious and studious. The title of the play carries a double
meaning: it represents both the symbolic normal day that Joe will never enjoy, as well as the
actual day on which the play occurs. The setting of A Day in the Death of Joe Egg regional
England in the mid 1960s implies that Brian and Sheila may not have had an opportunity to
articulate their emotions over Joes condition. The constraints of English middle-class culture
force the couple to devise their own strategies for coping in the absence of close friends,
relatives, neighbours or counsellors to assist them. Following the performance of one of these
sketches, Sheila directly addresses participants: I join in these jokes to please him. If it helps
196
him live with her I cant see the harm, can you? (Nichols, 1967: 44). In this moment, Sheila
reveals that Brian needs the emotional catharsis that these repetitive performances provide. Later
in the play, Brian tries to euthanise his daughter through an overdose of medicine. To hide his
actions from Sheila, Brian carries Joe throughout the house, hiding her in different rooms, then
moving her again. The scene becomes a shocking black farce, with doors opening and slamming,
as well as characters disappearing, re-emerging and yelling at each other. Joe comes close to
death, but is revived following a trip to hospital. A few hours later, Brian claims to be going out
momentarily, but he deserts his wife and child. The final scene suggests that, for Brian, the
process of catharsis through black humour is an insufficient coping strategy. The comic material
he creates serves to manifest and dissipate his stress to a certain extent, but the final scene reveals
that catharsis through black humour is not a panacea. It is relevant to note that Peter Nichols
created this play in response to the personal experience of raising a disabled child. Nichols says
the writing process went very quickly because the subject matter was so powerful (Hiley,
1978: 15).
19
See endnote 9 for clarification of my perspective on the notion of catharsis.
20
Baudelaire also links laughter to the notion of sin. He believes that the sense of infinite
grandeur that humour provides is yoked with the infinite wretchedness of human beings in
comparison to God (1956: 117).
21
Davies primary research interest is jokes rather than texts for performance. Although he does
not write specifically about black comedy, his findings are applicable to various types of
material. Due to the specific focus of this thesis, as well as the breadth and volume of Davies
research, his work cannot be fully detailed here.
22
Most examples of black comedy may be analysed using more than one of the three key
theories of humour. In this scene from The Big Lebowski, black humour stems not only from
superiority but also from incongruity. The supposed sanctity of the mortuary is juxtaposed
against Walters blasphemy, while the funeral director's ornate urn sits in contrast to the plain red
coffee tin. In addition, the black humour in this scene may be partially explained by the catharsis
theory. Participants may generate emotional tension in the scene involving Donnys death, then
may release these feelings through the subsequent scenes with Walter and Dude. As noted, the
next and final chapter of this thesis touches upon the interrelationship of the three theories of
humour.
197
To recapitulate, the first two chapters of this thesis investigate ideas about black comedy
and black humour, as well as contemporary attitudes towards, and depictions of, death. In
these chapters, I consider the questions: What is black humour? Why is it popular and
resonant at this time? In Chapter 1, I provide an overview of the development of the
form of expression known as black comedy. I differentiate between the terms black
comedy and black humour in order to focus my analysis. I identify black comedy as
the written, visual or auditory texts that deal with death in a potentially amusing manner.
I reserve black humour for the experience of perceiving and appreciating these texts.1
This distinction helps pinpoint the difference between structural and functional issues in
my analysis.
In Chapter 2, my key point is that black humour is a complex cognitive and emotional
experience that is shaped by, and in turn influences, contemporary attitudes and practices
associated with death. I argue that there is a powerful juxtaposition in late twentieth and
early twenty-first century Western societies between the unspoken absence and overt
presence of death. In many ways, the end of human life is private, sequestered and
secularised. Yet at the broader social level, it is also communal, publicised and
mediatised. I believe this set of circumstances fosters the creation and proliferation of
black comedy as a unique, intricate and controversial form of expression.
These first two chapters of the thesis set the stage for the analysis to follow. The third and
fourth chapters examine structural and functional issues related to the phenomenon of
black humour. In this work, I apply the three key theories of humour - incongruity,
catharsis and superiority to black humour. Interwoven through these chapters are
analyses of a range of scenes from black comic plays, scripts and screenplays. These
discussions address the questions: How does black humour work? What does it do for
participants? In Chapter 3, I discuss the ways in which information about death is
198
The central argument from these two chapters is that the incongruities, uncertainties and
anxieties surrounding death generate and configure the experience of black humour.
These conflicts around loss spark a process of evaluation for participants a process that
may have a variety of effects. Black humour may create resolution, heighten emotional
pain, release tension, shift perspectives, deepen disconnections, reinforce beliefs or have
little impact at all; it may also merge some of these effects, so that the experience seems
strange and ambiguous, even if it is pleasing. The three theories of humour incongruity,
catharsis and superiority help illuminate the process through which people experience
black humour, although none of the three theories in isolation offers an entirely
satisfactory explanation of the phenomenon.
In this final chapter, I seek to integrate my primary points from previous chapters. The
first section below speaks to the areas of overlap between the three key theories of
humour. To this end, I analyse a black comic scene using all three approaches. In the
section that follows this discussion, I consider the ways in which black comedy may
facilitate resolution and yet create dissonance for participants. The third part of this
chapter reviews the physical metaphors that scholars employ to describe humour and,
more specifically, black humour. Lastly, I discuss how participants seem to use the
experience of black humour to make sense of death. As in the preceding chapters, my
research combines theoretical discussion with the analysis of black comedy texts. I bring
199
together the excerpts in this thesis firstly because they help illustrate my theoretical
argument and secondly because, to my knowledge, there is currently no published
collection of texts of this type.2 I believe these black comic scripts, drawn from theatre,
film and television in the late twentieth century, deserve focused analytical attention.
Finally, my main purpose throughout this thesis is to develop a richer picture of black
humour in the late twentieth century.
Most examples of black comedy may be analysed through either the incongruity,
catharsis or superiority theories of humour. Humour studies scholars often use only one
theory exclusively, or use the theories successively to analyse different texts. Yet these
three theories overlap and therefore seem complementary rather than mutually exclusive.
In this section, I apply each of the three theories to the same black comic text in order to
highlight the interrelatedness of these concepts.
As in many of the texts discussed in previous chapters, there may be more than one
explanation for the bleak hilarity in Mairtin McDonaghs A Skull in Connemara (1999).
The play stimulates powerful questions about death. What rules apply to the handling of a
buried corpse? If faced with the sight of a loved ones skeleton, how would we respond?
How can people cope when they are repeatedly exposed to the macabre? A Skull in
Connemara is disturbing, yet there is also a haunting emotional resonance a kind of
cold truth about the brevity of life which this material exposes.
The following scene offers a dark comic frame through which to view the characters
attitudes towards death. In their conversations about corpses, the characters employ
language and images that are fractious, rebellious and merciless. At the same time, the
excerpt below reveals how the characters use black comedy to cope with the stress of
their charnel work. This scene also allows participants to feel more knowledgeable and
capable than the characters. Given these complex and numerous areas of conceptual and
200
emotional conflict, I apply all three theories of humour to this play and work with the
areas of intersection between the theories.
A Skull in Connemara follows two Irish gravediggers called Mick and Mairtin as they
exhume corpses from an overcrowded church cemetery. (The parish has a process of
rotating burial plots, so that every corpse is dug up after seven years to make room for a
new one.) Mick, the older of the two gravediggers, has been doing this work for years.
Mairtin is on his first day at the job. In the following scene, Mick is particularly tense
because his deceased wifes burial plot is due to be dug up imminently. As the scene
begins, Mick is standing waist-deep inside a dark grave, lifting out loads of dirt with a
shovel. Mairtin is resting against a headstone.
Sound of Micks shovel hitting the rotten wood at the bottom of the
grave.
MAIRTIN:
Are you through to him?
MICK:
Pass me the sack down.
Mairtin jumps up from where he is and looks down into the grave.
Sound of Mick jimmying rotten wood apart with his shovel
Mairtin moves around a little to get a better view of the corpse.
MAIRTIN:
Ah yi yi, look at that one. Who is he? Glances behind [at the
headstone]. Daniel Faragher. Never heard of him.
MICK:
I knew him to say hello to.
MAIRTIN:
Would you recognise him? (Mick looks at Mairtin as if hes
stupid.) Not from his bare skull, no, of course. Although he still
has a lock of hair there, now. He looks like a big dolly.
MICK:
A what?
201
MAIRTIN:
A big dolly. Like girls do play with.
MICK:
The girls wont be playing with this dolly.
MAIRTIN:
I know that, sure. Im only saying
MICK:
And pass me the sack for the fiftieth time.
Mairtin goes off mumbling behind the headstones.
MAIRTIN:
Ill pass you the fecking sack . . .
[He] returns with a large, dirty cloth sack half-full of the bones
and skulls of two corpses.
MAIRTIN:
Pass your skull to me, Mick. Just to compare, now.
Mick tosses Mairtin the skull with the lock of hair on it, then starts
placing the bones from the grave into the sack, keeping a quiet eye
on Mairtin as he idles around with the skulls, placing them against
his chest like breasts at one point, kissing them together at another.
MAIRTIN:
Sure skulls are great oul things. Its hard to believe you have
one of these on the inside of your head.
MICK:
Its hard to believe you have one of them anyways, and the
brain to go with it Kissing skulls together. Like an oul
schoolgirl.
MAIRTIN:
Pause. When do oul schoolgirls kiss skulls together, sure?
MICK:
Pause. Im just saying, like.
MAIRTIN:
202
203
MICK:
Thats the reason you dont know, so. Isnt it illegal in the
Catholic faith to bury a body with the willy still attached? Isnt
it a sin in the eyes of the Lord?
MAIRTIN:
Incredulous. No . . .
MICK:
Dont they snip them off in the coffin and sell them to tinkers
as dog food?
MAIRTIN:
Horrified. They do not . . .
MICK:
And during the famine didnt the tinkers stop feeding them to
their dogs at all and start sampling the merchandise
themselves?
MAIRTIN:
They did not now, Mick.
MICK:
You would see them riding along with them, munching ahead.
MAIRTIN:
No . . .
MICK:
Thats the trouble with young people today. They dont know
the first thing about Irish history.
(McDonagh, 1999: 84-86)
By engaging with this scene, participants are likely to perceive a gap between how the
characters should handle the skeletons, and how they do treat these remains. This
juxtaposition between expected and actual behaviour invites participants to make
comparisons and judgments about social mores related to death. According to the
incongruity theory, participants experience humour when they acknowledge, appreciate,
and possibly resolve, apparent incompatibilities within a text. In relation to the scene
above, participants may perceive black humour by comparing their expectations about the
treatment of human remains to Mairtins antics with the skulls. Participants may also
204
laugh at the gap between Micks preposterous story and actual church practices. In
considering these juxtapositions between social norms and the characters actions,
participants may form the view that they are superior to Mairtin and Mick (e.g. more
intelligent, successful and judicious, less nave, nescient and impulsive). Thus, inherent in
the comparisons participants make is a set of judgments about abilities of the characters.
While the incongruity theory suggests that participants compare social norms to elements
within a text, the superiority theory implies that participants compare themselves directly
to the characters. In both cases, participants align their idealised expectations with their
perceived realities. Thus, both the incongruity and superiority theories of humour involve
a process of evaluation. Although the focus is slightly different, the two theories may be
seen as complementary. From this perspective, participants who engage with A Skull in
Connemara may understand and appreciate the silly irreverence of Mairtins macabre
mime, while at the same time feel disdain for him.
The process of comparison described above also overlaps with the catharsis theory. As
discussed previously, Freud (1960) distinguishes tendentious comedy from innocent
comedy, as potentially offensive material. He believes that tendentious comedy is created
in order to provoke; it presents ideas, actions or situations that break social rules.
According to Freuds version of the catharsis theory, participants who engage with
tendentious comedy build up emotional tension surrounding the subject matter. This
tension may then be released through laughter and other manifestations of humour. Yet
how do participants determine whether tendentious comic material is funny? This seems
to occur through a process of comparison that is analogous to the process articulated in
the discussion of the incongruity and superiority theories of humour. Participants engage
with a text, then assess whether the information presented matches with social norms and
personal expectations. If not, the material may be perceived as controversial and therefore
potentially funny, offensive, or both. This gap between the ideal and actual may lead
participants to a heightened emotional state, which then dissipates through the experience
of humour. In this respect, all three key theories of humour rely upon a process of
comparison.
205
In addition, participants may find that Micks gruesome guile allows them to feel better
about themselves in relation to the foolish Mairtin. Participants may feel assured, and
perhaps less anxious, when they compare their lives to those of the characters. For
example, participants know it is unlikely that they will be confronted with the awful task
of exhumation; they know they are likely to have better ways to make a living. In this
sense, the superiority theory allows for the dissipation of emotional tension, which marks
an area of overlap with the catharsis theory. Participants may enhance their sense of
control, at least in the short term, by feeling superior to people who are facing death or by
releasing anxiety about death or by doing both simultaneously.
However, one of the differences between the three theories is the extent to which each
perspective allows for, or predicts, a sense of resolution. The incongruity theory implies
that black humour may involve the resolution of a conceptual gap between conflicting
elements within a text. According to this perspective, elements that seem impossibly
linked (e.g. the Catholic Churchs policy on removing genitalia from a corpse) may
eventually seem reasonable (i.e. when seen as a ploy to tease the miscreant Mairtin). The
catharsis theory, on the other hand, suggests that participants release tension through
black humour and thereby achieve a kind of emotional equilibrium. In relation to A Skull
in Connemara, Freuds version of catharsis theory suggests that participants may feel
uncomfortable with Micks grotesque story, but may discharge this anxiety by laughing at
how the tale challenges taboos about death and religion. Participants may also relate to
Micks desire to joke his way through a gory evening of work. Both of these
206
Although these differences seem to render the theories incompatible, the concepts do not
address the same aspects of the experience of humour. The incongruity theory looks more
at how participants comprehend black humour through the conceptual structures within a
text, whereas the catharsis and superiority theories relate mainly to how participants
process the emotional aspects of black humour. Thus, the three theories are compatible in
certain respects, even though they speak to different factors within the experience of
black humour.
Taken together, the three key theories of humour represent the best conceptual tools
researchers currently have for analysing the phenomenon of humour. More specifically, I
argue that these three theories also enlighten the experience of black humour. Yet the
theories do not necessarily answer the question of whether participants perceive the
experience of black humour as more resolved, close-ended and finite, or more
disintegrated, open-ended and continuous. In the following section, I consider how black
humour may create both these sets of effects.
Resolutions
The notion of resolution is influential in humour studies research (Bergson 1956, Dundes
1987, Koestler 1975, Suls 1983). This concept suggests that the process of getting a joke
involves the comprehension of confusing or challenging information. With black comedy,
this process often involves confronting the physicality of the corpse and making sense of
disparate notions of loss.
207
A scene from David Williamsons (1980) play Travelling North illustrates the concept of
resolution in black comedy. In this moment, an elderly orchestral conductor called Frank
dies from a heart attack while sitting in his favourite chair. Half an hour later, as his
family and friends gather around to discuss the funeral arrangements, Franks chair shifts
and his feet suddenly move. His friend Saul and wife Frances are shocked. The characters
then realise that the chairs footrest has slipped down. They burst into laughter. Saul
identifies the mistake and also honours Frank by saying: My God. I thought for a second
that the old boy had come back. Much as I loved him, I couldnt have taken another three
years (Williamson, 1980: 88).
In this scene, the apparent movement of Franks body is incompatible with his death.
When the characters and participants learn that the chairs faulty footrest was to blame,
they comprehend that both scenarios can logically co-exist. In addition, those who loved
Frank acknowledge that it is possible to grieve his death, while at the same time feel
208
slightly relieved that the old curmudgeon is gone. As noted previously, Koestler describes
this moment of insight as bisociation, meaning that two conflicting notions fuse
together, while retaining aspects of their original meaning (1975: 35).
In the American television series Monk (2002-2006), a police detective called Adrian
Monk suffers from obsessive-compulsive disorder. This condition irritates his colleagues
immensely but contributes to his forensic insights because Monk has an incredible ability
to recall minute details. Despite his previous dismissal from the police force for
psychiatric reasons, Monk is brought back as a consultant to solve murder cases.
In one episode, Monk attends the funeral of political candidates bodyguard who was
killed in the line of duty. The case is less than straightforward, so Monk slips into the
church balcony in order to observe the funeral guests. In leaning forward for a better
view, he drops his house keys and they fall into the open coffin of the bodyguard. Since
Monk is deeply attached to the key ring it was a gift from his late wife he is desperate
to retrieve the keys before the coffin is sealed at the end of the service. He hesitates to
interrupt the funeral because the politician, the media and hundreds of bereaved guests are
in attendance. So, the obsessively clean Monk opens a container of dental floss that he
carries at all times. He unravels several meters of it, attaches a bent paper clip and lowers
it from the balcony towards the open coffin. When he believes he has captured the keys,
he gives the line a strong tug. Instead of grabbing the keys, however, Monk hooks the
dead mans sleeve and jerks his entire arm up out of the coffin into full view. For a
209
moment, it looks as though the dead man is waving. The guests are understandably
shocked; the funeral crumbles into disarray.
The explanation for this bizarre incident is similar to the scene from Travelling North: a
deceased persons body is moved by an external force. As in the previous scene with a
moving corpse, the comic moment in Monk requires resolution; two seemingly
incompatible concepts a dead man seems alive again are reduced to one reasonable
explanation. This scene also has the potential to precipitate catharsis. Participants may
have accumulated emotional tension surrounding the death of the bodyguard and may feel
relief and pleasure at the dissipation of these feelings through laughter. In addition, the
scene may generate a sense of superiority. Participants may feel themselves to be more
insightful and less gullible than the characters who assumed the dead man was waving.
Participants may therefore enjoy the characters mistakes and bask in the heightened selfregard this perspective provides. Thus, all three theories of humour incongruity,
catharsis and superiority shed light on this scene from Monk.
Thus, a conceptual resolution seems to contribute to the perception of black humour, but
it is not the sole process shaping that experience. Because resolution involves the
evaluation of various elements within the comic text, the connections participants make
may dissolve and reform. An incongruous situation may appear to be resolved, yet may be
disrupted again by a subsequent interpretation. Palmer suggests that cognitive resolution
does not entirely eliminate incongruity. Instead, he contends, the perception of humour
involves a bifurcated logical process through which participants are aware of both the
inconsistencies and the connections between juxtaposed elements (1994: 96). Thus, the
sense of resolution involved in black humour seems somewhat tenuous and unstable. This
point leads into the next section on dissonances, which looks at how black comedy resists
resolution.
210
Dissonances
Winston argues against the ubiquity of comic resolution. He says black humour is
opposed to simplistic thinking (1972: 270). Instead, he suggests that black comedy
works by verbally yoking disparate concepts without attempting to reconcile them
(ibid.). He suggests that participants who engage with black comedy are uneasily
suspended between disgust and amusement, between emotional involvement and
detachment (1972: 284). For Winston, the perception of black humour involves
conceptual and emotional flexibility. Through the process of evaluating dark comic
material, participants encounter multiple viewpoints on the issues and situations involved.
Participants expectations about death may change as they gain additional information
through a text. As a result, participants may not resolve the incongruities found in black
comedy; they may instead embrace a kind of energetic, vacillating perspective on death
and the social conventions surrounding it.
Nelson (1990) points out that participants may resolve the conceptual incongruities in
black comedy, but still not find the text funny. For these individuals, personal and social
sensitivities towards the subject matter may outweigh the pleasure involved in perceiving
black humour. Nelson suggests that individuals who have been least successful in
mastering [a] particular fear may find it impossible to laugh (1990: 8).
Morrow (1987) argues that although participants may understand black comic material,
they do not necessarily accept the implications of the joke. People may feel very
concerned about the social conditions, institutions and practices that relate to the deaths
described within the material. Morrow says that black comedy, and in particular jokes
about terminal illnesses and fatal disasters, do not lead to resolution. Black comedy may,
however, help people to process tragedy more effectively, in both a psychological and
social sense. Through the experience of black humour, participants may move from the
anger of disillusionment to the resigned adaptation of living with our very fallible
systems (1987: 264).
211
The John Wayne Principle by Tony McNamara (1997) is a challenging black comic text
that resists resolution. In this bleak, satirical Australian play, two siblings lose their moral
fortitude when tempted by the inheritance of a massive fortune. Robbie and Serena, both
in their late twenties, take over a large company from their father after he attempts
suicide. Neither of the siblings hold any affection for the older man, who is a powerful,
self-obsessed corporate tycoon. The play begins on the day their father tried to shoot
himself in the head. He does not die, but the resulting injury sends him into a coma.
Robbie and Serena then visit their father in hospital.
ROBBIE:
How is he?
SERENA:
Comatose with half his face missing, and yet weve never got
along so well. Have we Dad? They say he might be able to hear
us, so be as rude as possible.
ROBBIE:
I cant believe hes alive.
SERENA:
Yeah, for a perfectionist he really botched this one.
ROBBIE:
Any chance hell come out of it?
SERENA:
Itd be a miracle, but the devil works in mysterious waysThis
is about as charming as he gets, so enjoy it while it lasts. Dad,
the prodigal sons come back with his wife. Finally, you two
are face to face again and hes missing his.
ROBBIE:
Give it a rest, Serena
SERENA:
Poignant moment is it?
ROBBIE:
No, not really. But if he flatlines Id like to hear it
(McNamara, 1997: 3-4)
212
In subsequent scenes, Robbie and Serena wrangle for control of their fathers enormous
business interests. They argue bitterly, but realise that they both want to succeed where
their father assumed they could not. This is the essence of the plays title, which stems
from the clich attributed to John Waynes cowboy persona: A mans gotta do what a
mans gotta do. Ultimately, the siblings agree to share the ownership and management of
their fathers corporation, HEL. They realise that the only way to proceed with their
aspirations is to ensure their father will not return from his unconscious state, so they go
back to visit him in hospital.
ROBBIE:
I have no hard feelings, I guess thats what Im here to say.
And that Ive got a problem only you can help with. Think of it
as working together, a new experience, our first father-son
thing. We probably shouldve done some fishing Dad, might
have helped.
Serena enters as he says the last sentence and stands beside him.
Robbie turns off the [life support] machine. They watch as he
flatlines.
SERENA:
Hed be so proud.
(McNamara, 1997: 53)
In this final scene, Robbie and Serena euthanise their father. The characters defy social
mores (and the law) in refusing to show concern for their father. This deathbed scene is
devoid of sentimentality, which reveals that in the weeks since their fathers attempted
suicide, Robbie and Serena have become more like him. They devolve into the person
213
they most detest. Thus, the black comedy in this play is created by Robbie and Serena, but
also operates at the expense of these two characters.
The John Wayne Principle highlights challenging issues in contemporary culture. What
drives peoples rampant materialism and narcissism? What makes people callous about
the loss of life? In this play, the characters actions reveal a socially aberrant perspective
on death. At the same time, the characters perspective seems consistent with the
coolness of contemporary culture. The siblings are pragmatic and unsentimental; they
believe it is logical to put their deceptive father out of his misery in order to simplify their
situation and enhance their assets. Yet they forget that, by taking this path, they may die
in the same circumstances as their father: moneyed but despised.
To summarise, black humour may involve a conceptual resolution, which in turn leads
participants to a different, and relatively coherent, perspective on death. Black humour
may also agitate and interrogate notions of loss without offering clear conclusions; this
may leave participants with a sense of dissonance and disequilibrium. Either way, the
perception of black humour involves an ability, and willingness, to continuously reassess
beliefs, attitudes and experiences associated with death. Seen in this light, the experience
of black humour opens up a kind of conceptual and emotional space that is less
vulnerable to social criticism; this experience permits experimentation at least
temporarily.
214
In addition, participants who appreciate black humour seem able to juggle various
possibilities, to withhold judgment and to allow incompatibilities to co-exist. Participants
operate in this liminal space even when the potentialities presented appear to be mutually
exclusive. The experience of black humour prompts compelling questions and
evaluations that, at the very least, place death in the foreground at both the personal and
social levels. I suggest that the experience of black humour is active and affecting for
participants, yet also equivocal and fleeting.
215
exerted upon a taut barrier of convention. This conceptual battle may result in increased
resistance (that is, the reinforcement of established conventions), or it may result in
change (the redefinition of boundaries to include new experiences). This metaphor
implies that black humour involves a degree of flexibility in the repositioning of personal
and social boundaries surrounding death.
Bergson (1956) also employs the notion of flexibility in his analysis of humour. He notes
that formal institutions (such as hospitals, schools, government departments and religious
organisations) engage in routinised activities and rituals, yet these entities often lack the
flexibility to serve the diversity and unpredictability of peoples lives. Bergson believes
that these inadequacies make institutions susceptible to ridicule. By highlighting frailties
within the establishment, black comedy offers the opportunity for a re-evaluation of
attitudes and practices associated with institutions. In addition, black comedy highlights
the breakdown of the human body. As noted previously, Bergson espouses the idea that
the human body [is] laughable in exact proportion as that body reminds us of a mere
machine (1956: 79). When applied to black comedy, this notion suggests that death
makes the body seem like a broken machine. Therefore, the corpse can be funny because
it is unresponsive and stiff. (This relates to the discussion in Chapter 3 of the unmovable
obese corpse in Six Feet Under.)
Bergson (1956) applies a more active physical metaphor in his description of humour as a
transformation related to music and sound. The perception of humour is possible,
Bergson believes, by transposing the natural expression of an idea into another key
(1956: 140). In this metaphor, Bergson sees keys, or musical subsystems, as different
ways of presenting the same essential elements. This metaphor sets cognitive and
emotional elements into particular positions that can be adjusted while maintaining the
relationship between these elements. The notion of transposition points to changes in the
tone and feeling of an entity, but not its crucial elements.
216
In keeping with this notion of forward movement, Winston (1972) uses a corridor
metaphor as a physical representation of black humour. According to this view, the
experience of black humour invites participants to travel up and back along a onedimensional line between disinterest and engagement. As participants advance, retreat,
and advance again, they gain information about the death-related elements in the text.
According to Winston, participants are unlikely to hold a static, stable conceptual
position when engaging with black comedy because this form of expression tends to
encourage, then discourage, involvement. This metaphor speaks to the textual unfolding
of information in a black comic text. The resulting stop-and-start feeling involved in the
experience of black humour creates a kind of psychological slippage: previous positions
wear away and new perspectives are entrenched. Winston suggests that this conceptual
erosion is accompanied by a sense of uncertainty and disorientation. Black humour
prompts shifts in participants beliefs and emotional states; it disturbs our certainty of
moral and social values and challenges our sense of a secure norm (Winston, 1972:
273).
Along these lines, Bergson (1956) and Koestler (1975) use the physical metaphor of
oscillation. They describe a sense of movement back and forth between two incompatible
poles, or entities. In relation to black comedy, the metaphor of oscillation suggests that
participants may be attracted, then repulsed, as they interact with the death-related
217
element in a comic text. This push-pull tension is arguably more pronounced in black
comedy than in other forms of expression because death is so confrontational. According
to the oscillation metaphor, black humour represents a way of being both engaged with,
and disengaged from, ideas about death.
Lauter (1964), on the other hand, uses the physical metaphor of a rigid surface or plate
that is fractured by the variation of everyday experience. "Comedy answers to [the]
human condition by breaking through the mechanical, stiff crust, restoring the flexibility
which is life" (1964: 376). Lauter employs a related metaphor centering on dissolution.
He believes that the perception of humour causes a softening or weakening of established
rules. These two metaphors, of breakage and dissolution, imply that comedy creates and
contributes to a sense of cognitive and emotional freedom. Lauter argues that this
openness allows "even hostile events [to be] perceived as amusing and passing" (1964:
376).
The perception of humour is also frequently described through violent metaphors. These
comparisons invoke the terminology of war with words like attack, destroy, slay,
kill, level, explode and murder; these are all considered highly positive slang
descriptions of the effect comedy has upon participants. The performance of comedy also
recruits the language of weaponry with the terms hit, bombard and rapid-fire. In
keeping with this perspective, Berger (1998) employs an invasion metaphor in which
comedy threatens participants sense of comfort. The invasion metaphor suggests that
participants must be forced, rather than charmed, into challenging their established beliefs
218
and behaviours. The aggressive language of this metaphor highlights the conflict between
participants perceptions and the information presented in comic material.
Overall, these metaphors tend to depict humour, and more specifically black humour, as
an active encounter a way of traversing an area or shaping an environment. Each of
these metaphors is useful in understanding the phenomenon of black humour. Perhaps the
most important aspect of this discussion of metaphors is the idea that black humour
posses the potential to move, or affect, participants and their society. Yet how extensive
and enduring are these influences? Humour studies researchers tend to endorse one of
two viewpoints on this issue. The first perspective is often referred to as the safety valve
effect (Zijderveld 1983). The second perspective, which does not have a consistent label
within humour studies research, is what I term the passport effect.
Zijderveld (1983) applies the metaphor of a safety valve to describe how the perception
of humour releases participants anxieties. According to this perspective, participants
who connect with comic material are able to wrestle with attitudes and practices that are
not part of their normal existence. For a limited period of time, social barriers are lifted
and participants are allowed to laugh at controversial subject matter. Following this
liberating encounter, however, previous social conditions are reestablished and rules are
reinforced (Lauter 1964, Zijderveld 1983).
Several other contemporary scholars advocate the safety valve perspective on humour.
Polan (1991) argues that, in general, humour is not a revolutionary force; it is primarily
concerned with entertainment and diversion, so it poses no challenge to existing
institutions and class structures.5 Berger (1998) says that humour seems to grant
participants temporary license to act outside of mainstream social practices. He does not
necessarily believe that comedy has the power to change established beliefs and practices.
Lauter (1964) cautions against assigning too much reformative power to the process of
humour perception. It seems unlikely, he states, that humour can "eliminate the very
foibles which it makes capital" (1964: xxiv). Similarly, Horton suggests that although
comedy may appear to alter social conditions, eventually order is restored and the rules
219
of society are maintained" (1991: 11). According to the safety valve perspective, humour
permits anarchy only within a limited temporal structure; participants test social
boundaries rather than modify them.
The safety valve perspective suggests that black humour is an appealing experience
because it permits the evasion of social taboos and the dissipation of uncomfortable
emotions.6 Yet this release of energy does not seem to alter the conditions that caused the
initial tension to accumulate. After the safety valve returns to its initial position,
participants are faced with the residual pains and tensions of their existence. Therefore,
this interpretation of black humour represents a provisional rather than permanent
solution to the difficulties that death and grief elicit.
Other scholars (Paul 1991, Dundes 1987) offer a different perspective on the longevity of
the effects of humour. They describe the experience as more of a passport, or a
passageway allowing movement from one conceptual position to another. According to
this interpretation, the experience of humour instigates a process through which people
question themselves and their society. This process may lead to significant and sustained
changes in participants beliefs and behaviours. Paul (1991) acknowledges that powerful
individuals, and the institutions to which they belong, are often apprehensive about the
anarchic qualities of humour. However, he believes this fear is a sign of the power that
humour exerts.
The passport perspective suggests that the experience of black humour may allow
participants to reshape attitudes and practices associated with mortality and may enable
them to cope more effectively with their losses. The passport imagery invokes a sense of
discovery, of finding new possibilities beyond old assumptions. In this sense, the passport
viewpoint is more optimistic and less conservative than the safety valve interpretation. In
an attempt to reconcile these two positions, Horton says that humour can be "conservative
or subversive or even both at once, depending on the audience and context" (1991: 4).
Horton also notes that, due to the constantly shifting nature of social attitudes and
220
Although the majority of humour studies scholars seem to advocate the safety valve
perspective, I suggest that the passport perspective deserves further attention, particularly
in relation to black humour. Through this thesis, I argue that the popularity and
pervasiveness of black comedy in contemporary culture highlights the relevance and
influence of this form of expression. I believe that black comedy has grown from a style
that simply highlights death and breaks taboos into a form that criticises social mores and
evokes alternate perspectives. Furthermore, I suggest that black comedy influences
individual beliefs and social rituals associated with death; these changes are then
expressed through black comedy.
The next and final section of the thesis looks at how people attempt to make meaning
from loss and how the experience of black humour may influence this process.
Facing death, whether it is ones own demise or that of a loved one, is a devastating and
demanding experience for most individuals. Bereavement is usually characterised by an
attempt to make sense of the loss, to place it in some kind of meaningful context.
Neimeyer emphasises that bereaved individuals often engage in a protracted and painful
quest for meaning (2005/6: 37). Drawing on extensive scholarship in this area,
Neimeyer (1996) says that the process of coming to terms with death occurs
predominantly through narrative schemata. People tend to use stories, ideas and images to
understand themselves as well as the social and cultural plot of which [they] are a part
(1996: 361). Maeve (1998) points out that it is not only the dying and bereaved that need
to make sense of death, but also the health professionals who care for them. Maeve
describes nurses attempts to deal with constant death as weaving a fabric of moral
meaning through stories of individual patients (1998: 1140). Neimeyer (1996)
221
demonstrates how death causes disruption to these narratives, leaving people feeling
fragmented, bewildered even dissociated from their own existence.
Extant humour studies research in the area of black comedy suggests that people use this
form of expression to cope more effectively in situations where death is present or
implied. Emersons (1969) research reveals that health practitioners utilise black comedy
in their hospital rounds, both with patients and other medical staff. The health
practitioners purposefully engage in black comic jokes and stories in order to raise
sensitive topics and release tension. Emerson argues that black comedy shifts the
boundaries of acceptable conversation and thereby opens the door to concepts that were
previously constrained. Health practitioners and their clients share complicity for rule
violations which potentially can be extended to allow for forthright discussions about
death (Emerson, 1969: 180). Similarly, Schulman-Green (2003) cites humour as one of
the strategies physicians use to cope with the constant discomfort and distress that
accompanies the care of fatally injured and terminally ill patients. Lefcourt and Shepherd
(1995), working in a related area, consider how black humour affects peoples
receptiveness to discussions of mortality. The researchers suggest that that the experience
of laughing at loss moderat[es] the emotional responses of those who are anxious about
222
death (1995: 135). Lefcourt and Shepherd believe that black humour enables people to
embrace alternatives around death (e.g. organ donation) that previously seemed too
distressing to contemplate. Thus, the experience of black humour may initiate a process
of negotiation that opens up, and potentially maintains, access to new or unconventional
perspectives on death. Humour can be used to directly subvert well-established rules of
behaviour by raising taboo topics that remain on the agenda (Palmer, 1994: 61). In this
manner, black comedy may evade the social boundaries that would otherwise prevent,
postpone, minimise or contain the overt discussion of death and grief; it seems to provide
a safe format for difficult encounters with mortality.
Morans (1990, 1997) research on the communications of emergency staff and fire
fighters indicates that black humour serves as a coping strategy during and after deathrelated experiences. Interviews with emergency workers reveal that black comedy helps
to verbalise concerns and release stress (Moran 1990, Melby 2001). These studies suggest
that emergency workers purposefully use black comedy to bring their experiences into a
communal context. These individuals may be signalling to others that they recognise the
horrors of their work (Moran, 1997: 36). Research by stedt-Kuki and Isola suggests
that the use of comedy in a hospital setting, whether or not the material relates to death, is
a strategy to create efficient interaction between nurses and patients and to provide an
outlet for feelings that might otherwise be difficult to express (2001: 457). Similarly,
Maeve cites nurses intentional engagement with black comedy to help manage the
darker aspects of nursing (1998: 1139). Overall, Moran believes that there is
considerable scope for [black] humour to act as a positive, healthy coping strategy in
emergency work (1997: 30). She cautions, however, that research into the therapeutic
benefits of black humour is inconclusive: an important delineation needs to be made
between a healthy use of humour and humour that is used to mask feelings [that] will
cause later distress (Moran, 1997: 36).
On the whole, current research demonstrates that, at both the individual and social levels,
black comedy serves as a potent articulation of diverse cognitions, emotions and practices
surrounding death. By engaging with black comedy, participants may challenge and
223
acknowledge pain, ridicule or advocate religion, define the boundaries of a social group,
and resuscitate or reject personal relationships. Black humour can make the issues
associated with death seem communal and manageable instead of isolating and
threatening. In essence, participants may actively use the experience of black humour to
reconceptualise the meaning of death.
Yet the question arises: why do people need to wrestle with death in this unusual way in
the late twentieth century? I contend that black humour is both a manifestation of, and a
contributing factor to, the indeterminate, questioning nature of contemporary life. As
discussed previously, late twentieth century culture may be characterised by a sense of
social uncertainty and flux, a feeling of dissatisfaction with the status quo and a deep
concern with individual uniqueness (Giddens 1991). Although Giddens does not
specifically discuss the phenomenon of humour, he emphasises the active role people
play in making meaning from their experiences. At the same time, people are involved in
reading and constructing collective representations: Individuals contribute to, and
directly promote, social influences that are global in their consequences and implications
(Giddens, 1991: 2).
Thus, I argue that the social conditions of the late twentieth century contributed to the
development and proliferation of black comedy. I theorise that the popularity of black
comedy is heightened by an increased ability to access information about death and a
decreased involvement with actual death. This operates in combination with frequent
exposure to explicit stories and images of dead and dying bodies in the media.
Consequently, individuals in contemporary society may be educated about the causes of
death and the concept of grief, but are not often witnesses to real death or dead bodies,
unless they work in particular professions (Bauman 1992). This set of social conditions
makes death seem simultaneously absent and present (Mellor 1993). It seems as though
death is both silenced and publicised, both hidden and exhibited, in contemporary culture.
As a result of this juxtaposition, people may have more personal and social tension
surrounding death; they may feel confused about how to understand loss and connect to
224
those who are dying or grieving. Since the issues surrounding death tend to be
emotionally and cognitively challenging, black comedy may generate particularly high
levels of controversy. I suggest that people purposefully create and engage with black
comedy in order to articulate the anxieties and ambiguities they feel surrounding death. In
writing about this process, I am aware that black comedy generated in realistic
circumstances, such as that documented by Schulman-Green (2003) and Moran (1990,
1997), is different from black comedy created by writers of texts intended for
performance. The black comedy used by individuals within a death-related situation tends
to be more informal and particular. This material may not be interpreted as funny by
those outside the situation (Ryan 1997). In addition, the primary purpose of this material
is to create narratives, ameliorate tension and perhaps foster an acceptance of loss. Black
comic texts, on the other hand, tend to be more formally constructed. Their purpose may
be to entertain and inform rather than provide coping strategies for grief, but the
characters within the reality of the text may use black comedy to alleviate stress just as
people do in their everyday lives. Furthermore, black comic texts are generally
reproducible and intended to be funny to wide range of participants.
Although there are differences between the two types of black comedy I discuss in this
thesis, both are embedded in the social circumstances of the late twentieth century. Thus,
I argue that both forms are a response to, and a factor that contributes to, the
absence/presence contradiction discussed above. I suggest that the current conditions
surrounding death serve to foster the creation and appreciation of black comedy and, in
turn, the constant presence of black comedy in cultural products of the late twentieth
century makes this form of expression a more acceptable strategy for the articulation of
beliefs and emotions related to loss. By laughing about death through black comedy,
people may release some of their anxiety and sadness. One of the outcomes of this
process may be that people may be that people gain and express new insights into
bereavement. Another outcome is that, due to the reduction in stress, people are less
inclined to address the underlying problems surrounding death in contemporary society.
Black comedy may provide a momentary escape, but the absence/presence juxtaposition
remains as problematic as it was previously.
225
Thus, I do not imply that the experience of black humour is always an effective strategy
for understanding and managing the complexities of death. As noted previously, I see
black humour as an interactive negotiation, not a pre-determined response to a stimulus.
Some participants who experience black humour may find it stimulating, insightful and
transformative, while others may find it cold, purposeless and offensive. I suggest that
black comedys relevance comes from the possibilities it engenders rather than the
answers it provides. Black comedy seems to elude the obvious despair of death by
presenting options some wild and improbable, others subtle and sincere. Through
engagement with these possibilities, participants they may approach the subject of death
with a more flexible, honest, critical perspective. In this respect, black humour may
enable people to make meaning from loss.
In conclusion, black humour may provide participants with an opportunity to turn the
most painful of human experiences into something new not necessarily something
clearer, happier or less ominous, but something different. In this sense, the experience of
black humour may create, complicate, amend or defer the sadness surrounding loss. Yet
the experience of black humour does not eradicate the absence/presence juxtaposition,
nor does it resolve all of peoples questions surrounding death. In this sense, the
experience of black humour may offer a precarious optimism: a sense that life will
inevitably end in death, but that this reality is tolerable when considered in the broader
context of human existence. Crouch and Hppauf caution that the history of
[humanitys] attempts to come to terms with death is a succession of obvious failures
(1985: 2). The phenomenon of black humour may be one of those enervating failures or
perhaps it is a strange and astonishing success.
226
Chapter 5 Endnotes
1
As established at the beginning of this thesis, I have chosen to focus on written texts that are intended for
performance in theatre, television or film. I do not consider issues related to production or performance of
these texts. I have narrowed the scope of the texts selected for analysis in this thesis to include only works
created in the later third of the twentieth century which deal with human death and dying.
2
My research has not uncovered any anthologies of black comic texts in the late twentieth century, either
using complete works or scenes. In the absence of this type of published work, I spent the past decade
reading, viewing and collecting black comic scripts for inclusion in this thesis. Inherent in my passion for
these texts as written works of art is also a desire to see the texts in production. As noted previously,
however, the presentation and reception of black comedy is not the focus of this thesis.
3
Koestler theorises that the path between these conceptual points is rapidly eclipsed through the experience
of humour, thus eliminating the need to traverse the surface area of these planes with detailed explanations
of potential connections. This concept is indebted to Freuds (1960) notion of psychic expenditure.
4
Again, I do not suggest that there is one consistent, coherent experience of culture for all people of a
certain age living in a particular country in the late twentieth century. I refer to the collective merely to
reflect the shared aspects of social existence at this point in time.
5
Polan (1991) analyses contemporary comedy by applying Jean Paul Sartre's writings on humour. Sartre
discusses how members of the bourgeoisie class in Europe used comedy to criticise social conditions and
therefore make possible their own ascension to power. Once in that position, the bourgeoisie were as fearful
of anarchic comedy as their predecessors. This point relates to the superiority theory, which implies that
participants establish and reinforce social boundaries because it gives them a sense of security and
superiority in relation to others.
6
In this respect, the safety valve perspective is similar to the catharsis theory: both advance the idea that
humour releases tension. However, the safety value perspective is more social in nature, while the catharsis
theory is more psychological (i.e. focused on the individual level of experience).
227
Bibliography
Anonymous
1984, The Arden of Feversham, Martin White (Ed.), W. W. Norton & Company, New
York.
Aristotle
1964a, Poetics in Theories of Comedy, Paul Lauter (Ed.), S.H. Butcher (Tr.), Anchor
Books, Doubleday & Company, Garden City, New York, pp. 9-20.
Aristotle
1964b, Coislinian Tractate in Theories of Comedy, Paul Lauter (Ed.), Lane Cooper
(Tr.), Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Garden City, New York, pp. 21-3.
Aristotle
1984, The Rhetoric and The Poetics of Aristotle, E.P. Corbett (Tr.), McGraw-Hill, New
York.
stedt-Kuki, Pivi and Arja Isola
2001, Humour Between Nurse and Patient, and among Staff: Analysis of Nurses
Diaries, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 452-458.
Australian Bureau of Statistics
2003, YearBook Australia 2003, Australian Bureau of Statistics report no. 1301.0,
Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, viewed on 20 August 2003,
<http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/C054EB06576C20B8CA256CAE000FC5
C1?Open>
Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care
2000, National Palliative Care Strategy: A National Framework for Palliative Care
Service Development, report prepared by the Commonwealth Department of Health
and Aged Care, Commonwealth of Australia, Publications Production Unit, Canberra.
Ayckbourn, Alan
1975, Absent Friends in Three Plays, Grove Press, New York, pp. 97-156.
Ayckbourn, Alan
1975, Absurd Person Singular in Three Plays, Grove Press, New York, pp. 13-95.
Ayckbourn, Alan
1982, Seasons Greetings, Samuel French, London.
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1968, Rabelais and His World, Helene Iswolsky (Tr.), Massachusetts Institute of
Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Barrick, Mac
1997, The Helen Keller Joke Cycle in The Humour Prism in Twentieth Century
America, Joseph Boskin (Ed.), Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan, pp.
195-207.
Barthes, Roland
1997, Image, Music, Text, Stephen Heath (Tr.), Hill and Wang, New York.
Bate, Jonathan
228
1995, Introduction in Titus Andronicus, Jonathan Bate (Ed.), The Arden Shakespeare,
Routledge, London, pp. 1-121.
Baudelaire, Charles
1956, The Essence of Laughter in The Essence of Laughter and Other Essays, Journals
and Letters, Peter Quennell (Ed.), Gerard Hopkins (Tr.), Meridian Books, New York,
pp. 107-130.
Bauman, Zygmunt
1992, Survival as a Social Construct, Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 9, pp. 1-36.
Becker, Ernest
1997, The Denial of Death, Touchstone Press, New York.
Beckett, Samuel
1954, Waiting for Godot, Grove Press, New York.
Bennett, Susan
1990, Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception, Routledge, London.
Berger, Jeffrey, Jack Coulehan and Catherine Belling
2004, Humor in the Physician-Patient Encounter, Archives of Internal Medicine,
Vol.164, pp. 825-830.
Berger, Peter
1998, Redeeming Laughter, Walter de Gruyter Inc. Press, Hawthorn, New York.
Bergson, Henri
1956, Laughter in Comedy, Wylie Sypher (Ed.), Presses Universitaires de France (Tr.),
Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 61-190.
Better Off Dead
1985, DVD recording of film released in 2002, Savage Steve Holland (Dir.), Gil Frieson
and Andrew Meyer (Exec. Prod.), Savage Steve Holland (Writ.), John Cusack and
David Odgen Stiers (Act.), A & M Films, Paramount DVD, 97 min.
Boskin, Joseph
1997a, Humor and History in The Humour Prism in Twentieth Century America,
Joseph Boskin (Ed.), Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 17-27.
Boskin, Joseph
1997b, The Urban Landscape in The Humour Prism in Twentieth Century America,
Joseph Boskin (Ed.), Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 117-123.
Boskin, Joseph
1997c, The Giant and the Child: Cruel Humor in American Culture in The Humour
Prism in Twentieth Century America, Joseph Boskin (Ed.), Wayne State University
Press, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 187-194.
Breton, Andr
1997, Anthology of Black Humour, Andr Breton (Ed.), Mark Polizzotti (Tr.), City
Lights Books, San Francisco.
229
Carlson, Marvin
1989, Places of Performance: The Semiotics of Theatre Architecture, Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Carroll, Lewis
2004, Alice in Wonderland, Gramercy, New York.
Carroll, Nol
1991, Notes on a Sight Gag in Comedy/Cinema/Theory, Andrew Horton (Ed.),
University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp. 25-42.
Chapman, Graham, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones and Michael Palin
1989, The Funeral Parlour in Monty Pythons Flying Circus: Just the Words, Volume
II, Methuen, London, pp. 42-3.
Chapman, Anthony J. and Hugh Foot
1977, Its a Funny Thing, Humour, Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christian, Beatrix
1998, Interview with Beatrix Christian, EXSTCE, Rachel Hennessey (Ed.), December
19, Vol. 16, No 4, pp. 1-3.
Coen, Ethan and Joel Coen
1998, The Big Lebowski. Faber and Faber, London.
Coen, Ethan and Joel Coen
1996, Fargo. Faber and Faber, London.
Cohen, Robert
1997, Theatre, Fourth Edition, Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountain View,
California.
Colletta, Lisa
2003, Dark Humor and Social Satire in the Modern British Novel, Palgrave Macmillan,
New York.
Cook, Albert
1964, The Nature of Comedy and Tragedy from The Dark Voyage and the Golden
Mean in Theories of Comedy, Paul Lauter (Ed.), Anchor Books, Doubleday &
Company, Garden City, New York, pp. 475-496.
Cooper, Lane
1922, An Aristotelian Theory of Comedy, Harcourt Brace and Company, New York.
Coser, R. L.
1959, Some Social Functions of Laughter, Human Relations, Vol.12, pp. 171-181.
Critchley, Simon
2002, On Humour, Routledge, London.
Crouch, Mira
2004, Last matters: The latent meaning of contemporary funeral rites' in Making Sense
of Dying and Death, Andrew Fagan (Ed), Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York.
Crouch, Mira and Hppauf, Bernd
230
231
1994, Euripedes Medea, Kenneth McLeish and Frederic Raphael (Tr.), Nick Hern
Books, London.
Feibleman, James K.
1964, The Meaning of Comedy in Theories of Comedy, Paul Lauter (Ed.), Anchor
Books, Doubleday & Company, Garden City, New York, pp. 461-474.
Feifel, Herman
1977, New Meanings of Death, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Fish, Stanley
1980, Is There a Text in this Class?, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
Fisher, Lucy
1991, Sometimes I Feel Like a Motherless Child: Comedy and Matricide in
Comedy/Cinema/Theory, Andrew Horton (Ed.), University of California Press, Los
Angeles, pp. 60-78.
Ford, Andrew
1995, Katharsis: The Ancient Problem, in Performativity and Performance, Andrew
Parker and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (Eds.), Routledge, London, pp. 109-132.
Foster, Verna A.
2004, The Name and Nature of Tragicomedy, Ashgate Publishing, Burlington, Vermont.
Foucault, Michel
1977, Discipline and Punish, Alan Sheridan (Tr.), Penguin Books, London.
Freud, Sigmund
1960, Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, James Strachey (Tr.), Hogarth
Press, London.
Freud, Sigmund
1976, Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, Vol. 6, Angela Richards (Ed.),
James Strachey (Tr.), Penguin Books, London.
Freud, Sigmund
1973, New Introductory Lecture on Psychoanalysis, Vol. 2, Angela Richards (Ed.),
James Strachey (Tr.), Penguin Books, London.
Freud, Sigmund
1985, On Humour in The Penguin Freud Library, Vol. 14 (Art and Literature), Angela
Richards (Ed.), James Strachey (Tr.), Penguin Books, London, pp. 426-433.
Fry, William
1971, Laughter: Is it the Best Medicine?, Stanford M.D., Vol. 10, pp. 16-20.
Fry, William
1994, The biology of humor, Humor, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 111-126.
Funny Bones
1995, DVD recording of film released 2003, Peter Chesholm (Dir.), Nicholas Frye
(Exec. Prod.), Peter Chesholm and Peter Flannery (Writ.), Hollywood Pictures, Walt
Disney Video/DVD, 128 min.
Giddens, Anthony
232
1991, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Stanford
University Press, Stanford, California.
Gorer, Geoffrey
1995, The Pornography of Death in Death: Current Perspectives, John Williamson
and Edwin Shneidman (Eds.), Mayfield Publishing Company, London, pp. 18-22.
Greenberg, Richard
1999, Three Days of Rain in Three Days of Rain and Other Plays, Grove Press, New
York, pp. 1-86.
Groundhog Day
1993, DVD recording of film released in 2001, Harold Ramis (Dir.), C.O. Erickson
(Exec. Prod.), Danny Rubin (Writ.), Bill Murray and Andie MacDowell (Act.),
Columbia Pictures, Sony Pictures DVD, 101 min.
Halliwell, Stephen
1987, The Poetics of Aristotle, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill,
North Carolina.
Harold and Maude
1971, DVD recording of film released in 2000, Hal Ashby (Dir.) Colin Higgins,
Mildred Lewis, Charles Mulvehill (Prod.), Colin Higgins (Writ.), Bud Cort and Ruth
Gordon (Act.), Paramount Pictures, Nickolodeon DVD, 91 min.
Harris, Daniel
1999, Coolness, The American Scholar, Autumn, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp.39-50.
Henley, Beth
1982, Crimes of the Heart, The Viking Press, New York.
Hiley, Jim
1978, Liberating Laughter, Plays and Players, March, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp.14-17.
Hobbes, Thomas
1997, Leviathan, Michael Oakeshott (Ed.), Touchstone, New York.
Hijer, Birgitta
2004, The Discourse of Global Compassion: The Audience and Media Reporting of
Human Suffering, Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 513-531.
Holloway, Alison
1996, What Is a Good Death? A Doctors View in An Easeful Death: Perspectives on
Death, Dying and Euthanasia, John Morgan (Ed.), The Federation Press, Sydney, pp.
39-45.
Horton, Andrew
1991, Introduction in Comedy/Cinema/Theory, Andrew Horton (Ed.), University of
California Press, Los Angeles, pp. 1-21.
Howarth, Glennys
2000, Australian Funerals in Death & Dying in Australia, A. Kellehear (Ed.), Oxford
University Press, Melbourne, pp. 80-91.
Jalland, Pat
2006, Changing Ways of Death in Twentieth-century Australia: War, Medicine and the
Funeral Business, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney.
233
Janko, Richard
1987, Aristotle: Poetics, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Jopson, Debra and Michael Bradley
2002, Thousands Mourn in Sydney Cathedral in The Sydney Morning Herald
newspaper, News section, 21 October, viewed on 22 October 2002,
<www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/10/20/1034561390118.html>
Kant, Immanuel
1952, The Critique of Judgment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kearl, Michael
1925, Death in Popular Culture in Death: Current Perspectives, John Williamson and
Edwin Shneidman (Eds), Mayfield Publishing Company, London, pp. 23-30.
Kellehear, Alan
2000, The Australian Way of Death: Formative, Historical and Social Influences in
Death & Dying in Australia. A. Kellehear (Ed.), Oxford University Press, Melbourne,
pp. 1-13.
Kellehear, Alan
2001, The Changing Face of Dying in Australia, Medical Journal of Australia, Vol.
175, pp. 508-510.
Kelly, George
1955, The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vols I and II, Norton Press, New York.
Kleinman, Arthur and Joan Kleinman
1997, The Appeal of Experience; The Dismay of Images: Cultural Appropriations of
Suffering in Our Times, in Social Suffering, Arthur Kleinman, Veena Das and
Margaret Lock (Eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 1-23.
Koestler, Arthur
1975, The Act of Creation, Picador Edition, Pan Books Limited, London.
Koziski, Stephanie
1997, The Standup Comedian as Anthropologist: Intentional Culture Critic in The
Humour Prism in Twentieth Century America, Joseph Boskin (Ed.), Wayne State
University Press, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 86-114.
Kubler-Ross, Elizabeth
1969, On Death and Dying, Macmillan, New York.
Kushner, Tony
1993, Angels in America, Part I: The Millennium Approaches, Theatre Communications
Group, New York.
Lahr, John
1993, Introduction in Joe Orton: The Complete Plays, Methuen, London, pp. 7-28.
Langer, John
1998, Tabloid Television, Routledge, London.
Last Orders
234
2001, DVD of film released in 2002, Fred Schipisi (Dir.), Fred Schipisi and Elizabeth
Robinson (Prod.), Fred Schipisi and Graham Swift (Writ.), Michael Caine and Bob
Hoskins (Act.), Columbia Tristar, Sony Pictures DVD, 109 min.
Lauter, Paul
1964, Introduction in Theories of Comedy, Paul Lauter (Ed.), Anchor Books,
Doubleday & Company, Garden City, New York, pp. xv-xxvii.
Lee, Felicia R.
2002, Long Buried, Death Goes Public Again in The New York Times newspaper,
Health section, 4 November, viewed 6 November 2002,
<http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9C00E5DD163EF931A3
5752C1A9649C8B63>.
Lefcourt, Herbert and R. Shepherd
1995, Organ Donation, Authoritarianism and Perspective-Taking Humor, Journal of
Research in Personality, Vol. 29, pp. 121-38.
Lefcourt, Herbert and Rod Martin
1986, Theoretical Approaches to the Study of the Sense of Humor in Humor and Life
Stress: Antidote to Adversity. Herbert Lefcourt and Rod Martin (Ed.), Springer-Verlag,
New York, pp. 1-14.
Levin, Harry
1972, Introduction in Veins of Humor, Harry Levin (Ed.), Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1-16.
Lewellyn-Jones, Margaret
1997, Introduction in The Playboy of the Western World, Nick Hern Books, London,
pp. v-xv.
Lewis, Paul
1997, The Killing Jokes of the American Eighties, Humor, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 251283.
Maddocks, Ian
2000, Palliative Medicine in Australia in Death & Dying in Australia, A. Kellehear
(Ed.), Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp. 243-254.
Maeve, M. Katherine
1998, Weaving a Fabric of Moral Meaning: How Nurses Live with Suffering and
Death, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, pp. 1136-1142.
235
236
237
Northcutt, Wendy
2000, The Darwin Awards, Dutton, New York.
Nowra, Louis
1981, The Precious Woman, Currency Press, Sydney.
Nowra, Louis
1993, Radiance, Currency Press, Sydney.
Nuland, Sherwin B.
1997, How We Die, Vintage, London.
Ochberg, Frank
2002, 9-11 Reactions: An Interview with Frank Ochberg, Gift from Within
organization, viewed on 18 Jul 2002, <www.giftfromwithin.org>
ONeill, Patrick
1993, The Comedy of Entropy: The Contexts of Black Humor in Black Humor:
Critical Essays, Alan R. Pratt (Ed.), Garland Publishing, London, pp. 61-88.
Orgel, Stephen
1995, The Play of Conscience, in Performativity and Performance, Andrew Parker
and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (Eds), Routledge, London, pp. 133-151.
Orr, John
1991, Tragicomedy and Contemporary Culture: Play and Performance from Beckett to
Shepard, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Orring, Elliott
1997, The People of the Joke: On the Conceptualization of a Jewish Humor in The
Humour Prism in Twentieth Century America, Joseph Boskin (Ed.), Wayne State
University Press, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 134-144.
Orton, Joe
1993, Loot in Joe Orton: The Complete Plays, Methuen, London, pp. 193-275.
Out of Sight
1998, DVD recording of film, Steven Soderburgh (Dir..), Barry Sonnenfeld and John
Hardy (Exec. Prod.), Scott Frank (Writ.), George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez (Act.),
Jersey Films, Universal Pictures, 123 min.
Palmer, Jerry
1994, Taking Humour Seriously, Routledge, London.
Pattie, David
2000, The Complete Critical Guide to Samuel Beckett, Routledge, London.
Paul, William
1991, Charles Chaplin and The Annals of Anality in Comedy/Cinema/Theory, Andrew
Horton (Ed.), University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp. 109-130.
Pfefferbaum, Betty, Rose L. Pfefferbaum, Carol S. North and Barbara R. Neas
2002, Does Television Viewing Satisfy Criteria for Exposure in Posttraumatic Stress
Disorder? Psychiatry, Winter, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 306-309.
Plautus
1971, The Meneachmus Twins & Two Other Plays, Lionel Cassson (Ed.., Tr..), W.W.
Norton & Company, New York.
238
Polan, Dana
1991, The Light Side of Genius: Hitchcocks Mr. and Mrs. Smith in the Screwball
Tradition in Comedy/Cinema/Theory, Andrew Horton (Ed.), University of California
Press, Los Angeles, pp. 131-152.
Polizzotti, Mark
1997, Introduction in Anthology of Black Humour, Andr Breton (Ed.), Mark
Polizzotti (Tr.), City Lights Books, San Francisco, pp. v-xi.
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R.
1965, Structure and Function in Primitive Society, The Free Press, Macmillan
Publishing Company, New York.
Rubin, Lewis D., Jr.
1997, The Great American Joke in The Humour Prism in Twentieth Century America,
Joseph Boskin (Ed.), Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 33-45.
Rumbold, Bruce
2000, Pastoral Care of the Dying and Bereaved in Death & Dying in Australia, A.
Kellehear (Ed.), Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp. 284-297.
Ryan, Cynthia
1997, Reclaiming the Body: The Subversive Possibilities of Breast Cancer Humor,
Humor, Vol. 190, No. 2, pp. 187-205.
Saunders, Jennifer
1994, Death in Absolutely Fabulous 2, BBC Books, London, pp. 27-51.
Saylor, Conway F., Brian L. Cowart, Julie A. Lipovsky, Crystal Jackson, and A.J. Finch, Jr.
2003, Media Exposure to September 11: Elementary School Students Experiences and
Posttraumatic Symptoms, The American Behavioral Scientist, August, Vol. 46, No. 12,
pp. 1622-1642.
Schopenhauer, Alfred
1964, The Word as Will and Idea in Theories of Comedy, Paul Lauter (Ed.), Anchor
Books, Doubleday & Company, Garden City, New York, pp. 355-377.
Schulman-Green, Dena
2003, Coping Mechanisms of Physicians who Routinely Work with Dying Patients,
Omega, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 253-264.
Shakespeare, William
1982, Hamlet in The Illustrated Stratford Shakespeare, Chancellor Press, London, pp.
799-831.
Shakespeare, William
1982, MacBeth in The Illustrated Stratford Shakespeare, Chancellor Press, London, pp.
776-798.
Shakespeare, William
1982, Richard III in The Illustrated Stratford Shakespeare, Chancellor Press, London,
pp. 552-584.
Shakespeare, William
1982, Titus Andronicus in The Illustrated Stratford Shakespeare, Chancellor Press,
London, pp. 678-700.
239
Silberman, Isaac N.
1987, Humor and Health: An Epidemiological Study, The American Behavioral
Scientist, Vol., 30, No. 3, pp. 100-112.
Simpson, J.A. (Ed.)
1989, The Oxford English Dictionary, Volumes I - XX, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Simpson, J.A. (Ed.)
1997, Oxford English Dictionary Additions Series, Volume III, Clarendon Press,
Oxford.
Six Feet Under
2001-2005, DVD recording of television series released 2006, seasons 1-5, Alan Ball et
al. (Dir.), Alan Ball (Exec. Prod.), Alan Ball et al. (Writ.), Frances Conroy and Peter
Krause (Act.), Home Box Office DVD.
Stephenson, Shelagh
1997, The Memory of Water, Dramatists Play Service, New York.
Styan, J.L.
1968, The Dark Comedy, Cambridge University Press, London.
Suls, Jerry
1983, Cognitive Processes in Humor Appreciation in Handbook of Humor Research,
Vol. 1, P. McGhee and J. Goldstein (Eds.), Spring-Verlag, New York, pp. 39-58.
Synge, John Millington
1997, The Playboy of the Western World, Nick Hern Books, London.
Sypher, Wylie
1956, Introduction in Comedy, Wylie Sypher (Ed.), John Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore, pp. vii-xvi.
Tarantino, Quentin
1994, Pulp Fiction, Faber and Faber, London.
Taylor, Andrew and Margaret Box
1999, Multicultural Palliative Care Guidelines, Palliative Care Australia, Melbourne.
Thorson, J. and F. Powell
1992, A Revised Death Anxiety Scale, Death Studies, Vol. 16, pp. 507-521.
United States Census
1999, United States Census Bureau, reports viewed on 18 October 2002,
<http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-1995_2000.html>
Volkan, Vamic D.
2003, Traumatized Societies in Violence or Dialogue, Sverre Varvin and Vamik D.
Volkan (Eds.), International Psychoanalytical Association, London, pp. 217-236.
Waking Ned Devine
1998, DVD recording of film released in 1999, Kirk Jones (Dir.), Alexandre Heylen and
Stephen Margolis (Exec. Prod.), Kirk Jones (Writ.), Ian Bannen and David Kelly (Act.),
Dendy Films, 20th Century Fox DVD, 91 minutes.
Walter, Tony
1991, Modern Death: Taboo or Not Taboo, Sociology, Vol. 25, pp. 293-310.
240
Waugh, Patricia
1984, Metafiction: Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction, Methuen, London.
Weaver, James and Dolf Zillmann
1994, Effect of humor and tragedy on discomfort tolerance, Perceptual and Motor
Skills, April, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 632-634.
Weekend at Bernies
1989, DVD recording of film released in 2005, Ted Kotcheff (Dir.), Victor Drai (Prod.),
Robert Klane (Writ.), Jonathan Silverman and Andrew McCarthy (Act.) Gladden
Entertainment Corporation, MGM DVD, 97 min.
White, E. B.
1977, Essays of E.B. White, Harper Collins, New York.
Williamson, David
1980, Travelling North, Currency Press, Sydney.
Williamson, John B. and Edwin S. Shneidman
1995, Introduction in Death: Current Perspectives, Fourth Edition, J. B. Williamson
and E. S. Shneidman (Eds), Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountainview, California,
pp. 1-8.
Winston, Mathew
1972, Humour Noir and Black Humor in Veins of Humor, Harry Levin (Ed.), Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 269-284.
Zijderveld, Anton C.
1983, The Sociology of Humor and Laughter, Current Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp.
1-103.
Ziv, Avner
1988, National Styles of Humor, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut.
Zolten, J. Jerome
1992, Joking in the Face of Tragedy in Black Humour: Critical Essays, Alan R. Pratt
(Ed.), Garland Publishing, New York, pp. 303-311.
241