RESEARCH ARTICLE
Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patch for Controlled Release of
Fluocinolone Acetonide
Joshi DM, Patel S, Moin MK, Patel AK, Patel VM
Pharmaceutics Department, A.P.M.C. College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research,
Motipura, Himatnagar 383001, Gujarat
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research was to design matrix type of transdermal patch of Fluocinolone
acetonide. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone K-30 (PVP K-30) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was used in fixed
ratio of 2:5 throughout the study and was concluded from preliminary study. Single layer matrix was
chosen for providing 24 hrs of continuous release. Solvent casting method was used for preparation
of patches. 3 level 2 factor full factorial designs was applied for optimization of batch for optimising
amount of poly ethylene oxide ( Polyox WSR 1105) and Propylene Glycol (PG). The effects of
polymer type, polymer ratio, permeation enhancer, plasticiser on drug release were evaluated by invitro release using treated cellophane paper by using Franz diffusion cell. In addition various other
characterizations like appearance, folding endurance, tensile strength, % moisture content, % drug
content, thickness, flatness was done. ANOVA for Response Surface Quadratic Model for %
cumulative drug release and % moisture content responses applied and found significant for
optimization. From the contour plot and over lay plot range of various amounts of PG and Polyox
found to provide desired responses. Validity of equation was checked by checkpoint batch was true
for present work.
KEYWORDS
Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS), Fluocinolone acetonide, solvent casting method, antiinflammatory.
INTRODUCTION
Mihir D Joshi
Pharmaceutics Department,
A.P.M.C. College of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research, Motipura,
Himatnagar 383001, Gujarat, India.
E-Mail Id: maruti.pharm@gmail.com
Copyright reserved by Journals Club & Co.
so
controlled
release
drug
21
concentration.
rate.
The
controlled
release
estradiol,
fentanyl,
nicotine,
acetonide
(Tripda
Chemicals,
Mumbai),
consumers,
Ahmedabad)
Ethanol
were
(Ureca
obtained
22
Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patch for Controlled Release of Fluocinolone Acetonide
and various amounts of Polyox WSR 1105 and
PG was selected as independent factors for 3
Excipients 4
400 cm-1
Physical Appearance 5
temperature
to
better.
Thickness 6
Patch
were
of each patch.
Weight Uniformity 6
membrane.
Folding Endurance 7
was
gradually
increased
thickness
reported
was
as
the
determined
mean
using
of
five
23
Tensile Strength 8
kg/cm2.
Percentage Elongation Break Test 1
profile) 9
determined
from
the
below
mentioned
formula.
Elongation percentage = (L1-L2) / L2
100
continuously
mentioned formula.
experiment
stirred
using
throughout
magnetic
the
beads.
The
24
Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patch for Controlled Release of Fluocinolone Acetonide
were measured spectro photometrically. The
amount
of drug
permeated
per
square
FA(mg)
PVA(gm) PVPK30
Polyox
PG
Ethanol
Water
F1
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.10
0.3
10
F2
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.25
0.3
10
F3
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.40
0.3
10
F4
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.10
0.6
10
F5
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.25
0.6
10
F6
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.40
0.6
10
F7
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.10
0.9
10
F8
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.25
0.9
10
F9
2.0
0.5
0.2
0.40
0.9
10
micron.5, 11
0.190-0.320 kg/cm2.
As the hydrophilic
25
other
properties.
Adhesion
was
simply
qualitative. 6,14,15
16, 17, 18
were
done
by
using
Shimadzu
1700
Spectrophotometer.
checked
for
both
response
and
found
values.
26
Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patch for Controlled Release of Fluocinolone Acetonide
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
F9
Physical
appearance
++
+++
++
+++
+++
+
++
++
+
Thickness
(m)
(n=3)
31010
3507.56
3805.77
3205.90
3607.88
3905.77
32010
3605.77
40010
Weight Uniformity
(mg)
(n=3)
5860.98
6941.96
8561.74
6040.85
7221.45
9252.06
6351.61
7801.56
9862.12
Folding
Endurance
(n=3)
1973.14
1652.12
1261.8
2305.65
1742.77
1433.1
2106.21
1904.26
1397.83
Tensile
strength
(kg/cm2) (n=3)
% Elongation
at break (n=3)
% Moisture
content (n=3)
% Drug
content
(n=3)
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
F9
0.3200.19
0.2800.32
0.2300.20
0.3050.15
0.2550.22
0.1900.12
0.2870.14
0.2430.29
0.1950.13
14.210.57
15.090.34
15.980.45
18.240.32
19.340.25
20.220.13
24.210.34
25.110.56
25.8714
4.140.68
10.11.15
21.21.88
5.20.87
12.11.2
22.32.32
6.80.68
15.20.95
23.11.45
96.241.23
98.461.05
98.050.97
99.140.78
97.351.18
100.241.86
96.970.88
98.231.13
95.781.54
27
Time
(Hrs)
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
7.190.71
7.900.85
7.190.96
7.191.08
8.620.91
9.670.98
10.421.02
10.390.85
11.110.77
11.171.26
14.081.73
14.830.98
15.551.04
15.580.63
14.861.63
18.591.56
20.061.02
19.371.36
17.931.71
20.061.54
22.371.46
23.880.89
23.841.85
21.621.63
23.880.53
27.572.48
29.071.32
29.072.12
26.820.56
29.071.88
32.112.4
34.330.86
32.891.68
31.361.12
33.612.01
35.900.86
38.151.42
37.371.63
34.431.75
37.401.66
40.371.02
42.631.23
41.871.96
36.711.68
41.871.44
10
44.882.62
47.130.96
44.952.16
41.121.45
45.662.03
11
49.390.84
51.641.56
48.671.85
44.191.85
49.421.85
12
52.461.53
57.591.98
53.862.45
47.201.75
52.462.45
18
68.401.65
75.092.16
69.182.46
64.582.37
69.122.48
24
81.331.54
88.092.26
79.211.75
78.292.06
79.932.56
Time
(Hrs)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
18
24
F9
0
7.902.01
9.700.42
14.080.35
17.871.02
23.060.86
26.160.36
29.170.56
33.611.01
37.400.86
41.160.65
45.631.22
47.981.3
56.700.56
61.411.1
28
Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patch for Controlled Release of Fluocinolone Acetonide
Fig 1d : Contour Plot Showing the Effect of X1 and X2 on % Cumulative Drug Release
Design-Expert Software
Factor Coding: Actual
% drug release
Design Points
88.16
% drug release
0.90
70
65
62.3
0.80
X1 = A: Amount of Polyox
X2 = B: amount of PG
B: amount of PG
75
0.70
80
0.60
0.50
85
0.40
0.30
0.10
0.17
0.25
0.33
0.40
A: Amount of Polyox
29
Design-Expert Software
Factor Coding: Actual
Overlay Plot
Overlay Plot
0.90
% drug release
moisture content
Design Points
0.80
B: amount of PG
X1 = A: Amount of Polyox
X2 = B: amount of PG
0.70
0.50
% drug release:
moisture conten
X1
X2
0.40
86.970
8.316
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.17
0.25
0.33
0.40
A: Amount of Polyox
moisture content
0.90
4.14
0.80
X1 = A: Amount of Polyox
X2 = B: amount of PG
B : am ount of P G
0.70
10
0.60
15
20
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.10
0.17
0.25
0.33
0.40
A: Amount of Polyox
Fig If : Overlay Plot Shows Optimal Area of Factor Can be Used for Desired Response
CONCLUSION
From the various amount of Polyox and PG,
formulation.
30
Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patch for Controlled Release of Fluocinolone Acetonide
7. Dr. Reddy. A. In vitro characterization and
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
wishes
to
acknowledge
Tripda
REFERENCES
Delivery
System-
Design
and
M.,
&
and
In
Vivo
Evaluation
Membrane-Moderated
of
Transdermal
A.
R.
innovation, 5-12.
3. Wokovich,
Prodduturi
S.
Transdermal drug
Journal
of
Pharmaceutics
and
delivery
system:
Biopharmaceutics , 18.
4. Anthony, C., Moffat, & David. M. Clarkes
1046.
Release, 1-15.
5. Trivedi, D. G. (2011).
Preparation and
of
M.Pharm
University, p.78.
326.
evaluation
of
transdermal
Desloratadine,
6. Dinesh,
S.,
(Thesis
&
Sairam.
patch
of
R.
(2012).
13. Guidance
for
Industry,
Topical
14. Tan, H. S., & Pfister, W. (1999). Pressuresensitive adhesives for transdermal drug
31
drug
delivery
system
32