The Dehumanisation of

the Masses:

Population Control & Reduction

Based on a interview with Qadosh Erectus

Visit: http://www.instituteofsocialsurvivalism.org
 The Dehumanisation of the Masses:
Population Control & Reduction
[The following interview, undertaken in late December 2009, was extracted from Thus Speaks Qadosh
Erectus: Political Thoughts For a Sane Society and distributed as a separate publication.]

Interviewer: The Copenhagen summit has recently finished and turned into a bit of a fizzer in
regards to reaching a legally binding climate change deal. Did this surprise you?

QE: Yes to tell the truth I was moderately surprised but most happy that it was a fizzer to
use your words. But no doubt officials are already working behind the scenes to iron
out the problems that arose so I would suspect that in the not too distant future
another summit will be held. If people want this to fail they had better become better
organised because United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has publicly
1
admitted that the agenda behind the Copenhagen summit and the climate change
fraud is the imposition of a global government and the end of national sovereignty.
Sadly many people fail to understand that global governance will develop out of any
future agreement on emissions and they also fail to understand that policies shall
certainly be introduced to reduce world population numbers.

Interviewer: From news reports we are given the impression that it was China’s fault that a binding
agreement wasn’t reached at the Copenhagen summit. Do you believe what we are
told is factual?

QE: Negotiation is about give and take - compromise. If parties sit down to negotiate a
deal you can not in all fairness lay the blame at the feet of one party if an agreement
is not reached. The so-called sticking point is that China wants consumer countries to
take responsibility for the carbon emissions generated in the manufacture of goods,
2
not the producer countries that export them. According to Mr Li, an official with
China's National Development and Reform Commission and climate change
negotiator; "As one of the developing countries, we are at the low end of the
production line for the global economy. We produce products and these products are
consumed by other countries … This share of emissions should be taken by the
consumers, not the producers." Now according to Oslo's Centre for International
Climate and Environmental Research in Norway, a third of all Chinese emissions are
linked to exports, with nine per cent caused by exports to the US, and six per cent
from producing goods for Europe.

Interviewer: Do you think that a compromise will be reached between the West and China that
consumers should carry the burden of emissions?

QE: I would be very surprised if a future agreement is not reached because of China’s
stance. In fact I would go as far to say that there is a segment in the West that may
have helped to orchestrate the failure of an agreement at the Copenhagen summit
because the Chinese way is what they desire.

Interviewer: If such an agreement is reached wouldn’t this imply that everything produced would
be given a carbon foot-print?

QE: Yes, that is how I would interpret it.

Interviewer: You mentioned population reduction…I haven’t heard about such plans?
3
QE: I was reading about the front-page commentary in the Vatican newspaper
L'Osservatore Romano that took the Copenhagen summit to task over its "nihilism,"
and consequent emphasis on population control and de-industrialisation. The article
quoted Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, who is the President of the Vatican Bank as stating that;
"Nihilistic thought, with its rejection of any objective truth and values causes serious
damage when applied to economics." Tedeschi recalled as an example the
"disastrous consequences" of Malthus' argument that population growth causes
poverty, as well as the theory that the economy is morally autonomous, which he said
has led to an "overly consumerist and materialistic" mentality. He went on to say that,
when applied to environmental issues, nihilism produces "even more serious
damage." In this case it leads to the attempt "to solve climate problems - where much
confusion reigns - through lowering the birth rate and de-industrialization, rather

2
 than through the promotion of values that lead the individual to his original dignity."
[Emphasis added]

Interviewer: In regards to Tedeschi’s statement opposing the lowering of the birth-rate…do you
believe that there is a problem of over-population in the world?

QE: Firstly, what do you mean by over-population? What standard do you apply in
reaching a conclusion there are too many people? Do you apply the criteria of (a) the
world’s ability to produce enough food to feed everyone or (b) the ability of each
individual country to feed its people?

If we apply criterion (a) then we apparently do not have over-population in the world
as the world has the capability to produce enough food to feed a far larger population
of people. If on the other hand we apply criterion (b) then there are a number of
countries in the world that lack this ability for various reasons.

Then of course if we apply a different criterion, that of a “standard of living”, then we

can come to a different conclusion depending on what is meant by “standard of living”.
What standard do we apply? Do we apply standard in the US or perhaps Europe, or
maybe the standard in China or India?

What is wrong with the standard of living of some herdsman in Africa living a nomadic
lifestyle? They have no need of electricity and all the mod-cons that rely on electricity.
What is wrong with the standard of living of an Amazon Indian living a simple lifestyle
on what the jungle provides?

Whose standard do we apply?

So what standard do we apply? Do we allow the controllers of Capital like the

Rothschilds and Rockefellers to set the standard? What God given right have they
been given to set the standard especially taking into consideration it has been these
types of people that have contributed greatly to many of the world’s problems.

The whole world over-population myth is a propaganda exercise

created by people with a Master Plan

Interviewer: Do you believe that there is an optimum world population and if so what would it be?

QE: It is something for each individual country to figure out, not some over-paid and well-
fed controller of Capital or Global Bureaucrat.

Now every country should have the ability to feed its own; this includes the ability to
put aside surplus to see them through periods of unsettled seasons that would affect
their food production. If a country has this ability it would be logical to conclude it does
not have a population problem.

Interviewer: I would have to assume that you do not believe the world has an over-population
problem. Would I be correct?

QE: The problem is that over-population catastrophists have been predicting doom and
gloom for centuries. Now before I go further I would I to quote the following:

"What most frequently meets our view (and occasions complaint), is our
teeming population: our numbers are burdensome to the world, which can
hardly supply us from its natural elements; our wants grow more and more
keen, and our complaints more bitter in all mouths, whilst Nature fails in
affording us her usual sustenance. In very deed, pestilence, and famine, and
wars, and earthquakes have to be regarded as a remedy for nations, as the
4
means of pruning the luxuriance of the human race."

Now this quote did not come from Thomas Malthus, whose Essay on Population in the
late eighteenth century is the seminal work to which much of the modern concern
about overpopulation can be traced. It did not come from Botero, a sixteenth-century
Italian whose work anticipated many of the arguments advanced by Malthus two

3
 centuries later. Neither is it is not found in the more modern catastrophist works such
5 6
as The Limits to Growth and Beyond the Limits.

No this quotation was penned by Tertullian, a resident of the city of Carthage in the
second century AD, when the population of the world was about 190 million, or only
three to four percent of what it is today. And the fear of overpopulation did not begin
with Tertullian as I understand that similar concerns were expressed in the writings of
Plato and Aristotle in the fourth century B.C., as well as in the teachings of Confucius
in the sixth century B.C.

While the facts show that the world has experienced population expansion that began
in the eighteenth century resulting in a six fold increase in population over the next
200 years most people fail to realise that the six fold increase in world population was
dwarfed by the eighty-fold increase in world output. As real incomes rose, people
were able to live healthier lives. Infant mortality rates plummeted and life expectancies
soared.

If we look back to 1900 the average world life expectancy was about 30 years, but in
1993 it was just over 65 years so over a period of ninety years life expectancy has
doubled.

Now the most startling revolution in the 20th century was one of health. Where a
century ago, almost any disease could kill someone in a matter of days, these
diseases are now routinely cured. Where once someone could hope to live into their
60s, people now routinely live well into the 70s, 80s, and even 90s. I believe that the
political economist Nicholas Eberstadt sums it up nicely when he stated that it is not
that people "reproduce like bunnies" rather that they "no longer die like flies."

It is not that people "reproduce like bunnies" rather that they

"no longer die like flies."

While we are still bombarded with propaganda from the over-population catastrophists
they fail to inform people that presently more than 80 countries have achieved what is
known as below replacement fertility, the point at which women are having so few
children, generally thought to be below 2.1 children per woman, that countries are no
longer replacing themselves. The UN predicts that every nation on earth, with the
exception of a few African nations, will reach below replacement fertility within the
next twenty years.

Interviewer: I never knew that.

QE: People also fail to realise while population growth peaked at 2.1 percent per year in
the late 1960s it has declined to its present rate of 1.14 percent. There is no doubt
that this trend will continue since, according to the latest information supplied by the
World Health Organization, the total fertility rates - the number of births per woman -
declined from 4.5 in 1970 to just 3.3 in 1990. That is exactly fifty percent of the way
toward a fertility rate of 2.1 which would eventually bring population growth to a halt. It
is interesting to note that presently [2009] the current World Total Fertility Rate is now
2.58 so the “population explosion” has begun to fizzle.
7
The Economist, a UK publication, recently had an interesting article on below
replacement fertility that in part stated:

“Today’s fall in fertility is both very large and very fast. Poor countries are
racing through the same demographic transition as rich ones, starting at an
earlier stage of development and moving more quickly. The transition from a
rate of five to that of two, which took 130 years to happen in Britain - from
1800 to 1930 - took just 20 years - from 1965 to 1985 - in South Korea.
Mothers in developing countries today can expect to have three children.
Their mothers had six. In some countries the speed of decline in the fertility
rate has been astonishing. In Iran, it dropped from seven in 1984 to 1.9 in
2006 - and to just 1.5 in Tehran. That is about as fast as social change can
happen.”

Interviewer: So it looks like there really isn’t any so-called population problem?

4
 OVER-POPULATION IS A MYTH

QE: Well before I go further I should explain that the term total fertility rate is used to
describe the total number of children the average women in a population is likely to
throughout her life. Associated with total fertility rate is the concept of replacement
rate. The replacement rate is the number of children each woman needs to have to
maintain current population levels or what is known as zero population growth. In
developed countries, the necessary replacement rate is about 2.1. Since replacement
can not occur if a child does not grow to maturity and have their own offspring, the
need for the extra point one child - a 5% buffer - per woman is due to the potential for
death and those who choose or are unable to have children. In less developed
countries, the replacement rate is around 2.3 due to higher childhood and adult death
rates.

You understand what I am saying?

Interviewer: Yes.

QE: Now referring back to your question. I believe I would disagree with you on that. I just
mention that the world appears to be heading for a birth-rate that well lead to a decline
in population. What people fail to realise is that if birth rates fall too far below
replacement levels this is going to create very serious problems leading to a rapidly
aging population that turns the demographic pyramid on its head.

If birth rates fall below replacement levels then this is a recipe

for social disaster as many economies will be able to afford to
support the older people

Look at this map of the world and you well get a better understanding of the situation.

Now the statistics used here are a few years out of date but they serve the purpose
for the subject we are discussing.

Now the countries highlighted in red have fertility rates of less then two which places
them below replacement, the countries highlighted in yellow have a fertility rate of
about two which places them on or below the replacement rate. The countries
highlighted in green have a fertility rate of three to four while the countries highlighted
in blue have a fertility rate of four or more. While most of the countries highlighted in
blue fall within the African continent people should remember that these African
countries have (a) a high infant mortality rate and (b) many of these countries have an
Aids problem that is predicted to decimate many of them.

5
Interviewer: Yes I comprehend the point you made. But surely with the right economic policies and
financial incentives people could be encouraged to at least have enough children to
keep the population stable?

QE: One would hope so. I would like to add that is what the economic policies contained in
Social Survivalism are designed to do. But encouraging couples to have larger
families aside, there appears to be a much more serious problem that has to do with
the apparent rise in both female and male infertility rates in the industrialised
countries. I should point out when I say infertility I mean the inability to become
pregnant or the ability to father a child.

Dr. Doris J. Rapp MD one of the worlds leading Paediatric Allergists and
Environmental Physicians says that by 2045 only 21% of the men on the entire planet
8
will be fertile.

By 2045 only 21% of the men on the entire planet will be fertile.
Doris J. Rapp MD "Is This Your Childs World" page 501

Interviewer: Growing infertility rates? What countries are affected?

QE: I already mention Europe but the problem is also affecting North America, Australia
and also New Zealand. As I mentioned it was predicted that within fifty years males in
Europe will be sterile and I would assume the same outcome in North America,
Australia and New Zealand.

I remember reading an article a while ago that pointed out that the ratio of male to
female children being born is also being affected. Apparently the number of male
children being born is starting to decline compared to the number of female children
born. Now something is drastically wrong and yet the problem is completely ignored. If
a farmer was facing this same decline in fertility amongst his livestock alarm bells
would be going off and the government would be spending money on investigating the
cause of the problem.

Interviewer: These facts surprise to say the least. But is it really as bad as you put it?

QE: Let’s look at some facts to give an idea on the seriousness of the developing situation:

 The Internet Journal of Urology 2004: Volume 2 Number 1 had an article

entitled “The sperm count has been decreasing steadily for many years in
Western industrialised countries: Is there an endocrine basis for this
decrease?” which states "If the decrease in sperm counts were to continue at
the rate that it is then in a few years we will witness widespread male
infertility.” [Emphasis added]
 An article in the New Scientist [January 1998] entitled "Confused fish" states;
"...children of older mothers having boys of lower fertility because of damage
to mitochondrial DNA, according to Justin St. John of the Sheffield Jessop
Hospital for Women."
 A documentary produced by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation entitled
"The Disappearing Male" stated that the quality of sperm is declining and that
“eighty-five per cent of the sperm produced by a healthy male is DNA-
damaged.” [Emphasis added]
 “LONDON. NEW research has confirmed fears that men are becoming less
fertile. The study shows a halving of sperm production in 10 years. Scientists
made the discovery after post-mortem studies of mostly middle-aged men
from Finland who died between 1981 and 1991. During that time the
proportion of men who had the normal biological processes leading to sperm
production fell from 56.4 per cent to 26.9 per cent. During the same period
there was a significant increase in the number of cases of ‘spermatogenic
arrest’, or men who did not have any mature sperm cells. The incidence of
complete spermatogenic arrest rose from 8 per cent to 20 per cent, and of
partial spermatogenic arrest from 31.4 per cent to 48.5 per cent. The weight
of the men's testicles had also diminished during the 10 years. Earlier
studies had already indicated a long-term lowering of both sperm, in quantity
and quality. A British study last year showed that men born in the 1970s
produced on average 25 per cent fewer sperm than those born in the 1950s.

6
 An annual decline of 2 per cent suggested that boys born 60 years from now
9
could be infertile. – PA”
 “Research into declining male fertility was controversial because the results
relied on sperm counts made on semen samples, which are notoriously
unreliable. But researchers led by Jarkko Parjarinen of the University of
Helsinki avoided the problem by examining We stffl tissue from the testes,
taken at post-mortem from 528 middle-aged Finnish men who died suddenly
in either 1981 or 1991. Among the men who died in 1981, 56.4 per cent had
normal, healthy sperm production. By 1991, however, this figure had
dropped dramatically to 26.9 per cent. The average weight of the men’s
testes decreased over the decade, while the proportion of useless, fibrous
tissue increased, says a paper from the Finnish team in the 4 January issue
10
of the British Medical Journal.”
 "The average sperm count of men may have fallen by as much as 29 per
11
cent over the past 12 years, according to a large new UK study."
 “A survey of 1,350 sperm donors in Paris found a decline in sperm counts by
around 2% each year over the past 23 years, with younger men having the
12
poorest-quality semen”
 “Results from a study of sperm counts among men attending Scottish fertility
clinics between 1989 and 2002 were announced recently at the fourth joint
meeting of the Association of Clinical Embryologists and the British Fertility
Society, 5-6 January 2004. The SPIN (Semen Parameters in the Northeast)
study measured sperm counts in more than 16,000 semen samples from
over 7,500 men attending the Aberdeen Fertility Centre. They found that
among men with sperm counts within the normal range (above 20 million
sperm per millilitre), the average sperm count had fallen over 14 years from
around 87 million sperm per ml to 62 [million] sperm per ml. Although still
well within normal parameters, this decrease represented a 29% drop in
13
average sperm levels over this period.”
 “Today the numbers of infertile men are much higher than it was during the
last decade. The recent Male Fertility Study, compiled by Norwich Union
Healthcare indicates that 2.5 million British men are affected. It is estimated
14
that one in 10 male has infertility problem due to low sperm count.”
 “In a well-respected study published in Environmental Health Perspectives,
an American reproductive epidemiologist named Shanna Swan published
work confirming that sperm counts are dropping by about 1.5 percent a year
in the United States and 3 percent in Europe and Australia, though they do
not appear to be falling in the less-developed world. This may not sound like
a lot, but cumulatively - like compound interest - a drop of 1 percent has a big
15
effect.”
 “The quality of New Zealand men’s sperm has halved in two decades – the
most dramatic drop of any Western country. . . A gathering of international
fertility researchers in Brisbane [were] told the sperm count carried by the
average New Zealand man decreased from about 110 million to 50 million
16
per millilitre between 1987 and 2007”

While falling fertility among males is happening there are other factors arising that
also impact on reproduction:


17
In an article in The Journal of the American Medical Association
researchers from the World Resources Institute in Washington, DC, show
that the number of male births in several industrialized nations has declined
significantly in the past few decades. Devra Lee Davis and colleagues
examined data from Denmark, the Netherlands, Canada and the US, and
found similar declines in the sex ratio, or the number of male births per
female births, in these countries.
 Damaged sperm have been linked to a 300% increase in testicular cancer - a
form of cancer that affects young men in their 20s and 30s.
 The number of boys born with penis abnormalities and genital defects has
increased by 200% in the past two decades.
 Boys have a higher incidence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,
learning disabilities, Tourett's syndrome, cerebral palsy and dyslexia.
 Boys are four times as likely to be autistic.

Now all the facts I have just given are easily verified.

7
 "If the decrease in sperm counts were to continue
at the rate that it is then in a few decades we will
witness widespread male infertility.”
Interviewer: I must say I had no idea on how serious this problem of infertility is.

QE: Well there is also the problem of female infertility. It is estimated that female
reproductive problems account for 40 percent of all infertility cases facing couples. Of
course it has been the trend for women to wait until their thirties before starting a
family; this of course reduces their chances of conceiving as a woman’s fertility peaks
around the age of 19-24, and generally declines after 30.

A woman’s fertility starts declining as early as her late 20s – not in her 30s as
was previously thought, according to a study published in Human
Reproduction, Europe’s leading journal of reproductive medicine.
“Female Fertility Starts Declining From 20s”
http://www.aphroditewomenshealth.com/news/20020401195016_health_news.s
html

Numerous studies have documented the increased risk for miscarriage and increase
in infertility as women age. As women age the incidence of chromosomally abnormal
eggs increases dramatically; poor egg quality results in poor embryo quality, which
reduces the chances of becoming pregnant and having a successful outcome. Also
male children born to older women tend to have a lower fertility because of damage to
mitochondrial DNA.

It is also interesting to note that male children born to older women tend to have a
lower fertility because of damage to mitochondrial DNA.

Interviewer: Mitochondrial DNA…?

QE: Mitochondrial DNA is maternally inherited - inherited from the mother

Interviewer: You mentioned in the section "Domination: Obsession & Power " that fluoride has
been shown to cause hormone disruption and low sperm counts. Do you believe that
fluoride is playing a major part in the decline of fertility?

QE: Firstly, it should be explained that there are two types of fluoride. Calcium fluoride,
which appears naturally in underground water supplies, is relatively benign. However,
too much consumed daily can lead to bone or dental problems. Calcium is used to
counter fluoride poisoning when it occurs. This redeeming factor indicates that the
calcium in naturally formed calcium fluoride neutralizes much of fluoride's toxic
effects.

On the other hand, the type of fluorides, fluorosilicate acid, sodium silicofluoride, and
sodium fluoride, added to water supplies and toothpaste, etc, are industrial waste
products of the nuclear, aluminium, and now mostly the phosphate industries. Now
when I use the term fluoride it covers all the three types that occur as waste products
from the various industries just mentioned.

While both types of fluoride, the naturally occurring calcium fluoride and the industrial
waste fluorides all contain fluoride, they are in fact totally different chemical
compounds, therefore the effects on the human body will be different. In fact it has
been claimed that industrial waste fluoride is 85 times more toxic than natural
18
occurring calcium fluoride. This was proven in a scientific study done some years
ago called "Comparative Toxicity of Fluorine Compounds." After this study was
completed, this statement was made:

"…this meant a daily intake of approximately 40 mg/kg of fluorine from

sodium fluoride as compared with 3400 mg/kg from calcium fluoride.
Therefore, from the standpoint of lethal concentrations and amount of

8
 fluorine necessary to cause growth inhibition, wide differences in toxicity of
some of the compounds of fluoride were noted."

There is strong evidence that fluoride is a contributor but I believe that there are a
number of other contributing factors playing a part.

Interviewer: You say strong evidence…I gather you have done research into this subject.

QE: Yes I have over the last several years.

Interviewer: Could you give some highlights from your investigation to back up your claims?

QE: Sure…no problem.

The following is an extract from a document released by the (US) National Federation
of Federal Employees entitled "WHY EPA'S HEADQUARTERS UNION OF
19
SCIENTISTS OPPOSES FLUORIDATION":
20
“In 1995, Mullenix and co-workers showed that rats given fluoride in
drinking water at levels that give rise to plasma fluoride concentrations in the
range seen in humans suffer neurotoxic effects that vary according to when
the rats were given the fluoride - as adult animals, as young animals, or
through the placenta before birth. Those exposed before birth were born
hyperactive and remained so throughout their lives. Those exposed as young
or adult animals displayed depressed activity. Then in 1998, Guan and co-
21
workers gave doses similar to those used by the Mullenix research group
to try to understand the mechanism(s) underlying the effects seen by the
Mullenix group. Guan's group found that several key chemicals in the brain -
those that form the membrane of brain cells - were substantially depleted in
rats given fluoride, as compared to those who did not get fluoride.”

The article then goes on to state some startling facts:

“In support of this concern are results from two epidemiology studies from
22 23
China, - that show decreases in I.Q. in children who get more fluoride
than the control groups of children in each study. These decreases are
about 5 to 10 I.Q. points in children aged 8 to 13 years.

“Another troubling brain effect has recently surfaced: fluoride's interference

with the function of the brain's pineal gland. The pineal gland produces
melatonin which, among other roles, mediates the body's internal clock,
24
doing such things as governing the onset of puberty. Jennifer Luke has
shown that fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland and inhibits its
production of melatonin. She showed in test animals that this inhibition
causes an earlier onset of sexual maturity, an effect reported in humans as
well in 1956, as part of the Kingston/Newburgh study, which is discussed
below. In fluoridated Newburgh, young girls experienced earlier onset of
menstruation (on average, by six months) than girls in non-fluoridated
25
Kingston. ” [Emphasis added]

Now 125 years ago, the average American girl reached puberty at age 17 but
26
presently the average age is below 10 - and dropping with every month that passes.
It is not only the US that has experienced a lowering in the age of girls attending
puberty at an increasingly younger age. The magazine New Zealand Listener had an
article "Growth spurt" which stated "that the average age of puberty has crept down"
in New Zealand and that: "According to the Ministry of Health, puberty starts for New
27
Zealand girls some time between nine and 14."

9
Of course there is the problem of precocious puberty which involves a "growing
number of young children beginning puberty early. They are getting breasts,
beginning menstruation and growing sexual hair as young as three or four-years-old,
28
some even sooner."

Now to the average person this may not sound all that much to get worried about, but
taking into consideration that a woman has only so many fertile years it would be
logical to conclude that the earlier that a female reaches puberty – the beginning of
fertility – the earlier in life her fertility will start declining.

And while on the subject of female reproductive health; State University of New York
researchers in the USA found more premature births in fluoridated than non-
fluoridated upstate New York communities, according to a presentation made at the
American Public Health Association’s annual meeting on November 9, 2009 in
29
Philadelphia.

In a research document entitled "Influence of Fluoride Intake on Reproduction in Mice"

by H. H. Messer, et al, the researchers state the following:

"Female mice were fed a low fluoride diet (0.1 to 0.3 ppm fluoride) plus
drinking water containing 0, 50, 100 or 200 ppm fluoride as sodium fluoride.
Toxic effects of fluoride were evidenced by retarded growth and impaired
reproduction in mice with intakes of 100 and 200 ppm fluoride, and the
higher level resulted in a high mortality rate (50% deaths in 5 weeks). Mice
with a low fluoride intake developed signs of fluorine deficiency, with a
progressive development of infertility in two successive generations.
Growth rate and litter size were not affected by the low fluoride intake, but
the percentage of mice producing litters was lower, and the age at delivery of
the first litter was greater than in mice receiving 50 ppm fluoride." [Emphasis
added]
30
Another group of researchers reported:

“Decrease in male reproductive potential was observed in rats and rabbits

after exposure to fluoride (Kumar & Susheela 1994, 1995; Narayana &
Chinoy 1994; Zhang et al. 2000; Collins et al. 2001). Besides decreased
sperm count, sperm motility, the sperm viability and HOS sperm coiling
percentages were also adversely affected in NaF-exposed rats. These
changes were greater in rats exposed to higher dose of NaF. The decreased
testicular steroidogenic enzyme activity levels may lead to decreased
steroidogenesis in experimental rats, which in turn may suppress the
reproductive activities in the male rats." [Emphasis added]

While much evidence is there to condemn fluoride as dangerous and it does in fact
impact on human fertility we can not lay the blame for all the rise of infertility in the
31
industrialised world at the feet of this chemical. A Reuter’s article in April 2009, "First
European evidence for earlier female puberty" stated:

"NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Girls are beginning to grow breasts at an

earlier age, and starting their periods sooner too, new research from
Denmark shows.

"The findings back up recent studies that found earlier breast development in
American girls over the past several years, but still can't answer the question
of why this might be happening, Dr. Lise Aksglaede of Rigshospitalet in
Copenhagen, the lead researcher on the study, told Reuters Health. 'At this
point, we don't know what is happening, and that is also what worries us.’

"Aksglaede noted that she and her colleagues have seen an increasing
number of girls with precocious puberty, meaning sexual maturation
beginning before age eight."

It should be pointed out that Norway does not add fluoride to its drinking water,
32
although some sources of drinking water does have naturally accruing fluoride
concentrations ranging with time from 1.4 to 2.4 ppm, the authorities in the Nordic
33
countries recommend the use of fluoride toothpaste twice a day.

10
Interviewer: What other chemicals cause or have been implemented in impairing fertility?

QE: I believe that one of the main causes of concern is a number of chemicals used in a
large range of plastic items. One group of chemicals are called phthalates.
[Pronounced "THAL-ates"] Phthalates, or phthalate esters, are esters of phthalic acid
which are oily, colourless liquids that have been used as plasticizers - added to
plastics to increase their flexibility, transparency, durability, and longevity. These
chemicals are found in many thousands of plastic items from products as vinyl flooring
and seat coverings, raincoats, shower curtains, garden hoses, a variety of hospital
equipment, children’s toys and items such as teething rings for children. They are
even used in sex toys, in the coatings of pharmaceuticals to create "enteric" coatings
and in the plastic linings of food and beverage cans. Phthalates are also used to “fix”
scents in products such as lotions, shampoos, soaps, and cosmetics.

There are numerous types of phthalates used. I believe there are about two dozen
common phthalates used, eight-ten phthalate aka 810P, butylbenzyl phthalate aka
BBP, di-n-butyl phthalate aka DBP, diethyl phthalate aka DEP, diisobutyl phthalate
aka DIBP, diisohexyl phthalate aka DIHP, diisononyl phthalate aka DINP, dimethyl
phthalate aka DMP, and dipropyl phthalate aka DPP, and the list goes on.

Another dangerous chemical used in a number of plastics is called Bisphenol A, which

is commonly abbreviated as BPA. Unlike phthalates, which are found in soft plastic
products, BPA is found in hard plastics like baby bottles and plastic containers such
as plastic water bottles. It is also used in the plastic linings of food and beverage cans.

Phthalates are easily released into the environment because there is no covalent
bond between the phthalates and plastics in which they are mixed. As plastics age
and break down the release of phthalates accelerates. But what is not generally
known by the public is that phthalates are Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals aka EDC’s
which interfere with the function of sex hormone receptors in humans.

Hundreds of animal studies have demonstrated that phthalates can damage the liver,
kidneys, lungs and reproductive system, especially the developing testes. They can
be absorbed through the skin, inhaled as fumes, ingested when they contaminate
food or when children bite or suck on toys, and are inadvertently directly administered
to patients from PVC medical devices.
34
As stated in the 2002 “Aggregate Exposures to Phthalates in Humans” report:

“Reports in the scientific literature over the past 10-15 years have raised
additional concerns. Developing organisms are uniquely vulnerable to
phthalate exposures, and in particular, the developing male reproductive
tract appears to be the most sensitive organ system. Abnormal
development of the testes, penis, and other components of the male
reproductive tract occurs at levels of exposure that are hundreds or
thousands of times lower than those necessary to cause damage in
adults.” [Emphasis added]

In animal tests, DBP - dibutyl phthalate - has been shown to produce detrimental
35
effects. The US based Environmental Working Group , a non-profit environmental
research organization, found that:

“DBP is a developmental and reproductive toxin that in lab animals causes a

broad range of birth defects and lifelong reproductive impairment in males
[when] exposed in utero and shortly after birth. DBP damages the testes,
prostate gland, epididymus, penis, and seminal vesicles. These effects
persist throughout the animal's life."

In fact men who enjoy chugging down a can of beer or sucking on bottled water might
be feeling the after effects in the bedroom if what a group of Chinese researchers
found is correct.

Interviewer: What do you mean?

QE: As I mentioned before that the plastic linings of food and beverage cans contain BPA.
Researchers in China conducted a five year study of 634 male workers from four
Chinese factories where exposure to BPA was significant. Researchers then

11
 compared the incidence of sexual dysfunction among these men with a control group
who did not have workplace exposure to BPA. The result: The men who were
exposed to the BPA were four times more likely to suffer from erectile dysfunction and
seven times as likely to have difficulty with ejaculation. Moreover, it didn't take long
periods of exposure for the sexual problems to kick in. Indeed, men who worked in the
factories only a matter of months appeared to be as affected as those who spent
36
years being exposed to the chemical. I wonder if this is the reason for the noticeable
increase in advertising offering men the opportunity to pop a pill to help them with
erectile dysfunction, a disorder that has become one of the many epidemics in our
new plastic world.

Interviewer: So you are saying that food stored in plastic can becomes contaminated with the
chemicals contained in plastics?
37
QE: An interesting article "Are Plastic Food and Beverage Containers Safe?" by James
Ferrel mentions a study released in 2003 by Croatian scientists:

"In 2003 a group of Croatian scientists reported that phthalates in plastics

dissolved in various solutions. They used a variety of plastic items, including
plastic food containers. After 10 days of sitting in distilled water, an average
of 55.4 mg/ of phthalates from each kilogram of plastic ‘migrated’ into the
water. To a lesser degree the phthalates from plastics dissolved into acetic
acid 3% (44.4 mg/kg) and 10% ethyl alcohol (32.3 mg/kg)."

The article then points out:

"Fatty foods in plastic containers are even more problematic, as fats are
absorbed differently and carry their phthalate solvents into our bodies more
easily. Phthalates bio-accumulate because of their fat solubility. Phthalates
concentrate in such fat organs in our bodies such as brains, prostates,
testicles, ovaries, breasts and, unfortunately, breast milk. (The other popular
food alternatives for infants are worse. Commercial baby formulas are loaded
with the manmade phthalates.)"

It is also interesting to note that a study examining the association between

employment in the plastics industry and infertility found higher incidences of infertility
38
among women working in the plastics industry.

Not only can phthalates apparently affect women’s fertility but if expectant mothers
are exposed to this chemical during pregnancy, they may then feminize their unborn
male babies.
39
A BBC News article last November covering research at the University of Rochester
in the UK showed that two types of phthalates can affect boys play behaviour and can
make boys more like girls. Elizabeth Salter-Green, head of the British group
CHEMTrust, called the chemicals “true gender benders”, and said parents should be
concerned about the impact on their children. The news item stated that there "are
many different types and some mimic the female hormone oestrogen." and that:
"Phthalates have the ability to disrupt hormones" and "impact on the developing brain,
by knocking out the action of the male hormone testosterone."

The Telegraph, a UK publication, also had an article on the above research and
stated: “Scientists at the University of Rochester in New York discovered that boys
born to women exposed to phthalates had smaller penises and other feminisation of
40
the genitals.”

12
 One must wonder what researchers would find if they investigated the relationship of
the impact of these chemicals in regards to sexual orientation in males and whether
there was a connection between these chemicals and what appears to be the
increasing incidence of homosexuality; it would be logical to conclude that feminised
males would be more susceptible to a homosexual lifestyle.

Interviewer: So you think that phthalates could affect a child’s sexual orientation as it develops?

QE: I suspect there could very well be a connection.

While a number of phthalates have a feminising effort on boys there is a growing body
of scientific evidence suggesting that the other chemical I previously mentioned
Bisphenol A, commonly referred to as BPA, is masculinising girls.
41
One of the latest studies involving BPA reported by USA Today stated:

"In the study of 249 pregnant women, the first to examine the effects of BPA
on children's behavior, researchers found that girls whose mothers had the
highest levels of BPA during pregnancy were more aggressive and
hyperactive at age 2 than other girls. Findings appear today in the journal
Environmental Health Perspectives.

"Girls were more likely to be aggressive if their mothers had high levels of
BPA - an estrogen-like chemical used in many consumer products - early in
pregnancy or at about 16 weeks, the study says."

While BPA apparently makes young females more aggressive it is interesting to note
that the above study showed “evidence of increased depression and anxiousness
42
among BPA-exposed boys.”

Interviewer: How long has BPA been used in plastics?

QE: I believe that BPA was invented 1891 but it wasn't until the 1930’s that scientists
discovered that BPA was an artificial estrogen and its use soon after began as a
pharmaceutical hormone. Another drug, diethylstilbestrol aka DES was invented in
1938 which was a stronger estrogen mimic then BPA; in 1941 the US FDA approved
DES which resulted in BPA being shelved. I believe in was in the early 1950’s that it
was discovered that adding BPA to certain plastics gave them strength and thus BPA
once again had a commercial use.

It should be noted that BPA has been suspected of being hazardous to humans since
the 1930s and yet it appears that this was kept from the public’s attention until recent
times when independent researchers learnt of BPA’s insidious influence upon the
human body.

Some type 3 plastics Some type 7 plastics

may leach bisphenol A may leach bisphenol A

Interviewer: You say “insidious influence” could you elaborate briefly?

13
QE: I will give you a few highlights from what researchers have discovered which you can
easily verify:

 Low doses of the environmental contaminant bisphenol A (BPA), widely used

to make many plastics found in food storage containers, including feeding
bottles for infants, can impair brain function, leading to learning disabilities
and age–related neurodegenerative diseases, according to Yale researchers
and colleagues. "These data heighten concerns about the potential long–
term consequences of human BPA exposure," said Neil J. MacLusky of
Helen Hayes Hospital, who conducted the study with Csaba Leranth, M.D.,
professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive
Sciences and in the Department of Neurobiology at Yale School of Medicine.
Leranth's group, which also included Tibor Hajszan, M.D., a research
scientist at Yale, found that low doses of BPA in female rats inhibit
estrogen–induction of synaptic connections in the hippocampus, an
area of the brain involved with expression of sexually differentiated
43
behaviours, as well as with formation and retention of memory.
[Emphasis added]
 Hugh Taylor, MD, professor and chief of the reproductive endocrinology
section at Yale University School of Medicine and his co-workers at Yale
injected pregnant mice with a low dose of BPA on pregnancy days 9 to 16.
After the mice gave birth, the scientists analyzed the uterus of female
offspring and extracted DNA. They found that BPA exposure during
pregnancy had a lasting effect on one of the genes that is responsible
for uterine development and subsequent fertility in both mice and
humans (HOXA10). Furthermore, these changes in the offspring's
44
uterine DNA resulted in a permanent increase in estrogen sensitivity.
[Emphasis added]
 The contaminant bisphenol-A (BPA)--widely used to make many plastics
found in food storage containers and dental products - can have long-term
effects in female development, according to a recent study by Yale School of
Medicine researchers. . . Taylor explained that if pregnant women are
exposed to the estrogen-like properties found in BPA, it may impact female
reproductive tract development and the future fertility of female foetuses
the mother is carrying. In addition to this new link to fertility and
reproductive health, previous findings by Csaba Leranth, M.D., also in Yale
Ob/Gyn, found that low doses of BPA in female rats inhibited estrogen
induction in the brain. This can lead to learning impairment and, in old age,
45
the onset of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease.
[Emphasis added]
 Bisphenol A, a chemical widely used in plastics and known to cause
reproductive problems in the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to it, also
has been found to retard the growth of follicles of adult mice and hinder their
production of steroid hormones, researchers report. Their study is the first to
show that chronic exposure to low doses of BPA can impair the growth
and function of adult reproductive cells. The researchers will describe
their findings this month at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of
Reproduction. A healthy, mature follicle, called an antral follicle, includes a
single egg cell surrounded by layers of cells and fluid which support the egg
and produce steroid hormones, said University of Illinois veterinary
biosciences professor Jodi Flaws, who led the study with graduate student
Jackye Peretz. "These are the only follicles that are capable of ovulating and
so if they don't grow properly they're not going to ovulate and there could be
fertility issues," Flaws said. "These follicles also make sex steroid hormones,
and so if they don't grow properly you're not going to get proper amounts of
these hormones." Such hormones are essential for reproduction, she said,
"but they're also required for healthy bones, a healthy heart and a healthy
46
mood." [Emphasis added]
 When it comes to Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure from polycarbonate plastic
bottles, it's not whether the container is new or old but the liquid's
temperature that has the most impact on how much BPA is released,
according to University of Cincinnati (UC) scientists. Scott Belcher, PhD, and
his team found when the same new and used polycarbonate drinking bottles
were exposed to boiling hot water, BPA, an environmental estrogen, was
released 55 times more rapidly than before exposure to hot water.
"Inspired by questions from the climbing community, we went directly to tests
based on how consumers use these plastic water bottles and showed that

14
 the only big difference in exposure levels revolved around liquid temperature:
Bottles used for up to nine years released the same amount of BPA as new
47
bottles." [Emphasis added]
 A new study from Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) researchers
found that participants who drank for a week from polycarbonate bottles - the
popular, hard-plastic drinking bottles and baby bottles - showed a two-thirds
increase in their urine of the chemical bisphenol A (BPA). Exposure to BPA,
used in the manufacture of polycarbonate and other plastics, has been
shown to interfere with reproductive development in animals and has
been linked with cardiovascular disease and diabetes in humans. "We
found that drinking cold liquids from polycarbonate bottles for just one week
increased urinary BPA levels by more than two-thirds. If you heat those
bottles, as is the case with baby bottles, we would expect the levels to be
considerably higher. This would be of concern since infants may be
particularly susceptible to BPA's endocrine-disrupting potential," said Karin
B. Michels, associate professor of epidemiology at HSPH and Harvard
48
Medical School and senior author of the study. [Emphasis added]
 In 1988, Patricia Hunt was conducting a routine experiment in her lab at
Case Western Reserve University when she ran into an unforeseen
complication. All of a sudden, the geneticist noticed that 40 percent of the
eggs of mice in her control group - the group she was not experimenting on -
had defects in chromosome behaviour, the kind of defects that can lead to
genetic errors like Down syndrome in humans, and that normally occur in
just 1 to 2 percent of all mouse eggs. . . Ultimately, Hunt and her colleagues
traced the problem back to the plastic cages the mice inhabited. Just before
the spike in egg abnormalities, they discovered, a lab technician had
accidentally washed the cages with a harsh detergent that caused the plastic
49
to begin breaking down. [Emphasis added]
 Researchers at Yale School of Medicine now have a clearer understanding
of why synthetic estrogens such as those found in many widely-used plastics
have a detrimental effect on a developing foetus, cause fertility problems,
as well as vaginal and breast cancers. . . Pregnant women are frequently
exposed to other similar substances with estrogen-like properties, such as
Bisphenol-A (BPA). BPA is found in common household plastics and has
recently been linked to long-term fertility problems. Like DES, these other
substances may also impact female reproductive tract development and the
50
future fertility of female foetuses. [Emphasis added]

It is also interesting to note that an association between BPA and an increased risk of
51
miscarriage has also been found. BPA exposure is linked to an error in cell division
called aneuploidy, which causes 10-20% of all birth defects in people, including Down
Syndrome. In studies with mice, BPA causes aneuploidy even at extremely low
52
doses. Now I should explain that aneuploidy is an error in cell division that results
in cells having the wrong number of chromosomes. In some cases there is a missing
chromosome, while in others an extra. Most cases of aneuploidy result in
spontaneous miscarriage of the foetus, but those babies that survive to birth after
aneuploidy are born with birth defects.

Interviewer: Surely with all the evidence available manufacturers using BPA would be looking for a
safe alternative and be warning consumers of the dangers?

QE: Maybe so in a perfect world. For a start the global production of bisphenol A in 2003
53
was estimated to be over 2 million tonnes and that the amount of BPA used in the
54
US is equivalent to six pounds per habitant per year thus the production of BPA is a
multi-billion dollar industry and its continued production and use is supported by some
very powerful interests. Of course the manufacturers of BPA and those with a vested
interest in its use have responded to concern about health risks by criticizing the
evidence as controversial, limited and overblown.

Take for example an article that appeared in The Washington Post exposing how big
businesses interests were planning a strategy to counteract a growing public concern
over the dangers associated with BPA.

"According to internal notes of a private meeting, obtained by The

Washington Post, frustrated industry executives huddled for hours Thursday
trying to figure out how to tamp down public concerns over the chemical
bisphenol A, or BPA. The notes said the executives are particularly

15
 concerned about the views of young mothers, who often make purchasing
decisions for households and who are most likely to be focused on health
concerns. . . Industry representatives weighed a range of ideas, including
‘using fear tactics [e.g. 'Do you want to have access to baby food
anymore?' as well as giving control back to consumers (e.g. you have a
choice between the more expensive product that is frozen or fresh or
foods packaged in cans) as ways to dissuade people from choosing
BPA-free packaging,' the notes said...The attendees estimated it would cost
$500,000 to craft a message for a public relations campaign, according to
the notes. ‘Their 'holy grail' spokesperson would be a 'pregnant young
mother who would be willing to speak around the country about the
55
benefits of BPA,' the notes said." [Emphasis added]

The leaked Coca Cola memo can be found here

http://www.ewg.org/files/BPA-Joint-Trade-Association.pdf
[May need to copy and paste the URL into your browser]

Independent Science Shows Harmful Effects from BPA

while Industry claims there is none

Interviewer: Are you claiming that vested interests are hiding the dangers of BPA from the
public…surely a number of people would consider such a statement as outrageous?

QE: An outrageous statement…well to the naïve person it may appear so, but if one has a
understanding of how all these big businesses are linked to those powerful elites
pushing for population reduction then it does not appear to sound all that outrageous
at all. Now whether or not there is a conspiracy on behalf of these elites to cover up
the impact of these estrogen type chemicals I am unable to say with any certainty as I
have not researched that angle. But never-the-less one should not dismiss such a
possibility taking into account the links between the main manufactures of BPA in the
US such as, Bayer MaterialScience, Dow Chemical Company, SABIC Innovative
Plastics - formerly GE Plastics - Hexion Specialty Chemicals, and Sunoco Chemicals
and their link to such organisations as the Council on Foreign Relations and the
Trilateral Commission; organisations that, as I have previously stated, support and
promote population reduction.

Now when we look at phthalates we find also that the manufacturing of this group of
chemicals is also a multibillion dollar enterprise. If we look at Western Europe for
example we find that over one million tons of phthalates are produced there each
56
year. Of course any talk of phthalates being dangerous to humans is vigorously
countered by vested interests in the manufacturing and marketing of phthalates. A
good example would be when researchers discovered a link between prenatal
exposure to the phthalates DEHP and DBP. The European Council for Plasticisers
and Intermediates, aka ECPI, issued a press release stating that this research
“claiming to show prenatal exposure to DEHP and DBP has feminising effect on
57
young boys should be treated with extreme caution”.

Interviewer: What is the ECPI exactly?

QE: It is a Brussels-based trade association representing the common interests of

European manufacturers of plasticisers. The ECPI's membership consists of nine
major European manufacturers such as Arkema, BASF AG, Evonik Oxeno GmbH,
ExxonMobil Chemical in Europe, OXEA GmbH, Oxochimie, and Perstorp Oxo AB. Of
course it should be realised that the ECPI is just a public relations front, or if you wish
to be blunt a propaganda organisation, for a much larger trade body the CEFIC - the
European Chemical Industry Council - which represents the views and interests of the
European chemical industry at a European Union level.

Of course a quick study of the seven major European manufacturers of phthalates I

just mentioned reveals that at least some of the top executives and major share-
holders in these companies have a close relationship to such organisations as the
Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the
Bilderberg Group. Of course I have to emphasise again that these organisations I just

16
 mention, the Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral
Commission, are all obsessed with population reduction.

Interviewer: How extensive are these connections?

QE: During my research I stumbled across a number of interesting connections but as of

yet I have not had the time to do an in-depth investigation.

Interviewer: Do you intend to follow this up?

QE: If or when I get the time I most probable will; at the moment though I haven’t the time
as I am involved in a number of other projects.

Interviewer: You stated that BPA apparently makes young females more aggressive …now I’m a
bit confused here. I thought that the male hormone testosterone is usually associated
with aggression…can a compound that is estrogenic increase aggressiveness in
females?

QE: Although estrogen is often considered a “female hormone,” it actually helps to

“masculinise” the male brain around the 11th and 12th weeks of pregnancy. The New
58
American quotes Louann Brizendine, a neuropsychiatrist and author of the book,
“The Female Brain” on this subject: “In the developing brain, timing is everything.”
Brizendine goes on to say; “I'm worried that tiny amounts of this stuff [BPA], given at
just the wrong time, could partly masculinise the female brain.”

Interviewer: But what you have just stated would it be too far fetch to consider that man-made
chemicals could also be increasing the incidence of lesbianism?

QE: That is a very good point. I remember stating in the "Questions & Answers: August
2007" that according to research “polycystic ovarian syndrome is twice as common in
lesbians.” When I was doing research into the impact of the various chemicals used in
plastics I remembered that “polycystic ovarian syndrome” seem to play a role in
lesbianism so I did a bit of checking and discovered a few interesting facts that
seemed to point to such a connection.

[NOTE: Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (pronounced pah-lee-SIS-tik) is also referred to

as Polycystic Ovarian Disease and Polycystic Ovary Disease]

An association between BPA exposure polycystic ovarian syndrome has been made
59
by Dr. Hugh S. Taylor, M.D., of Yale University, USA.

Japanese scientists found that women with polycystic ovarian syndrome had higher
serum levels of BPA relative to women with normal ovarian function, and that there
were positive correlations between BPA concentrations and androgen levels
60
(Takeuchi et al. 2006).

Taken in its totality, the range of toxic effects linked to BPA is startlingly similar to the
litany of human health problems on the rise or common across the population,
including breast and prostate cancer, diabetes, obesity, infertility, and polycystic
61
ovarian syndrome (Myers 2007).

Regarding the link between polycystic ovarian syndrome and lesbianism?

Researchers have found the first evidence that a common cause of infertility in
women is more prevalent amongst lesbians than heterosexuals, and they suggest that
the biochemical disorder associated with the condition might contribute to the
women's sexual orientation. . . Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is the
commonest cause of ovarian dysfunction in women and is caused by an imbalance of
sex hormones. One of the main features of PCOS is hyperandrogenism [male steroid
hormones in women causing excess facial and body hair, deepening of the voice and
loss of breast tissue] and now that the researchers have discovered the increased
prevalence of PCOS amongst lesbian women they hypothesize that
62
hyperandrogenism could be contributing to the women's sexual orientation.

Researchers found that the prevalence of PCO [polycystic ovaries] was 32% in
63
heterosexual women and 80% in lesbian women.

17
 [Note: The term 'polycystic ovaries' describes the ovaries, as seen on the ultrasound
scan. Many women have ovaries that are polycystic, but do not have any of the other
symptoms or hormone findings as described previously]

Now I have mentioned a few studies done on the connection between BPA and
polycystic ovarian syndrome.

The connection between it all is just a matter of connecting the dots. Well we know
that BPA’s are gender benders and we also know that BPA’s are linked to polycystic
ovarian syndrome and that the incidence of polycystic ovarian syndrome is much
higher among lesbian women. I believe a strong case exists that lesbianism to a large
degree is created due to one or more chemical contaminants.

Interviewer: Do you have any idea on how widespread polycystic ovarian syndrome is?
64
QE: According to the US based Hormone Foundation: "As the leading cause of
infertility and the most common hormone disorder among women of childbearing age
(15-45) Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) affects as many as 7 million women in
the United States alone." The Foundation also list some of the symptoms associated
with polycystic ovarian syndrome such as:

 Irregular menstrual cycles - Fewer periods than normal or periods marked by

heavy or excessive bleeding
 Infertility - Polycystic Ovary Syndrome inhibits a woman’s ability to form eggs
in a normal way, which may lead to an inability to conceive
 Unwanted body or facial hair growth - Because Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
involves the excess production of androgens, it can lead to thicker and
darker facial hair as well as increased hair growth on other parts of the body
 Weight gain - Another common symptom of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome is
that women gain weight easily while having difficulty taking it off
65
Another article this time in the UK online magazine Healthy states that: “PCOS is
the most common hormonal disorder in women of childbearing age. Up to one in four
women in industrialised countries has certain features of the condition and most
of them don’t even know it. Symptoms of PCOS typically start in puberty and continue
through adulthood, and can range from very mild to severe.” [Emphasis added]

Interviewer: You state a strong case exists that lesbianism to a large degree is created due to one
or more chemical contaminants. Do you have any other evidence based on research
to add apart from the connection with polycystic ovarian syndrome?

QE: A while ago I came across two interesting documents by the Karolinska Institute in
Stockholm, Sweden. In one study using positron emission tomography the
researchers studied responses to a testosterone derivative in men's sweat, called
AND, and an estrogen-related compound in women's urine, called EST on
heterosexual men and women and homosexual men and lesbian women.
66
In the 2006 study the researchers discovered that when heterosexual women and
homosexual men smelled AND their brains showed activity in the anterior
hypothalamus, a region of the brain that is highly involved in sexual behaviour but
EST only produced activity in the olfactory region of their brains which is the area that
processes smells. But when heterosexual men smelled AND it only produced activity
in the olfactory region of their brains while EST produced activity in the anterior
hypothalamus.
67
In a second study done in 2007 on lesbian women and positron emission
tomography the researchers discovered in contrast to heterosexual women, lesbian
women processed AND stimuli by the olfactory networks and not the anterior
hypothalamus. Furthermore, when smelling EST, they partly shared activation of the
anterior hypothalamus with heterosexual men. The article states that the data
supported the researchers’ “previous results about differentiated processing of
pheromone-like stimuli in humans and further strengthen the notion of a coupling
between hypothalamic neuronal circuits and sexual preferences.”

Interviewer: You say that when smelling EST, they partly shared activation of the anterior
hypothalamus with heterosexual men. Any ideas on why this should be so when the

18
 results from tests with homosexual men and heterosexual men and women were so
cut and dry?

QE: Interesting point. In regards to lesbian women showing similar brain activity to
68
heterosexual men when they inhaled EST the lead researcher, Ivanka Savic, stated:
"We can't say whether the differences are because of pre-existing differences in their
brains, or if past sexual experiences have conditioned their brains to respond
differently." Now this bit about brain conditioning which implies a psychological
manipulation ring a bell in my mind regarding what the molecular geneticist and
researcher Angela Pattatucci said about lesbianism being “culturally transmitted”.

If it is true that lesbianism can be “culturally transmitted” this would mean, in some
women at least, that lesbianism is brought about by psychological conditioning and is
not chemically driven.
69
In regard to this I found a statement by Dr. Dean Hamer, who was at the time, chief
of gene structure and regulation at the Laboratory of Biochemistry at the National
Cancer Institute in the USA, quite revealing when he said: “Women tend to be more
sexually fluid. We've interviewed lesbians who have always identified as lesbian but
who fantasize about men.” If what Dr. Hamer says is correct in that women “tend to be
more sexually fluid” this would give weight to Angela Pattatucci’s statement that
lesbianism can be “culturally transmitted”.

Interviewer: What is the anterior hypothalamus?

QE: The anterior hypothalamus is part of the hypothalamus. The hypothalamus is located
below the thalamus, just above the brain stem. In humans, it is roughly the size of an
almond that contains a number of small nuclei with a variety of functions. One of the
most important functions of the hypothalamus is to link the nervous system to the
endocrine system via the pituitary gland.

Interviewer: Right…I understand.

70
QE: The published results from the 2006 study done by the Karolinska Institute involving
lesbian women states:

“In animals, the choice of sexual partner is highly influenced by signals from
sex-specific pheromones. These signals are processed by specific nuclei
located in the anterior hypothalamus, identified as male and female mating
centers. A lesion of the respective mating center as well as impairment of
pheromone transduction may alter the coital approach in a sex-specific way.
For example, electrolytic lesion of the preoptic area is reported to shift the
mean preference of male ferrets away from the estrous females to the stud
males. Male rats are found to reduce their coital behavior after destruction of
the preoptic area and show more interest in stimulus males than receptive
females. Female ferrets, however, preferred females after destruction of the
ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus and did not allow males to intromit,
whereas female rats increased the proportion of female approaches after
kindling of the preoptic area.” [Emphasis added]

[The preoptic area is a region of the hypothalamus. According to the MeSH

classification, it is considered part of the anterior hypothalamus.]

19
 [The ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus is a nucleus of the middle hypothalamus,
the largest cell group of the tuberal region with small-to-medium size cells.]

Now it was this reference to damage to the “preoptic area” changing the sexual
orientation of animals that made me think about the possibility of damage to the
hypothalamus in humans also affecting their sexual orientation.
71
I came across an article in The Advocate that mentioned a study by Simon LeVay
that showed that the anterior hypothalamus was twice as large in straight men as in
72
gay men. I tracked an article down relating to this research and it stated that LeVay
had “found that a particular cluster of cells in the forefront of the hypothalamus was,
on average, less than half as large in the brains of homosexual men as in their
heterosexual counterparts.” It also mentioned that “the hypothalamus is known as the
seat of the emotions and sexual drives.”

Now being cautious I looked for more similar research to see that if after researchers
had reached the same conclusion. I found an interesting article entitled
73
"Homosexuality: Nature or Nurture" by Ryan D. Johnson that mentioned two other
studies. One in 1990 by D.F. Swaab who “became the first to document a
physiological difference in the anatomical structure of a gay man's brain. Swaab found
in his post-mortem examination of homosexual males' brains that a portion of the
hypothalamus of the brain was structurally different than a heterosexual brain. The
hypothalamus is the portion of the human brain directly related to sexual drive and
function.” The other study by scientist Laura S. Allen around the same time as
Swaab’s also made a similar discovery.

Now it appeared logical to me that if the anterior hypothalamus plays a part in sexual
preference, to consider the possibility that the anterior hypothalamus could be
compromised by chemicals originating outside of the body i.e. Endocrine Disrupting
Chemicals.
74
A bit of searching found an interesting study by L. Monje, et al, which examined the
effects of neonatal exposure to the endocrine disruptor bisphenol A, also referred to
as BPA, on the hypothalamic circuitry controlling the female sexual behaviours of
adult rats. The study concluded that; “Our results show that BPA permanently alters
the hypothalamic estrogen-dependent mechanisms that govern sexual behavior
in the adult female rat.” [Emphasis added]
75
Another study by T. Funabashi, et al, dealing with rats stated; "The present study
suggests that BPA influences reproductive functions, including sexual behaviour
even in adulthood, by altering the PR system in the hypothalamus." [Emphasis
added]
76
In the article by Ryan D. Johnson which I mentioned previously he states:

“The neuroendocrine viewpoint's basic hypothesis is that sexual orientation

is determined by the early levels (probably prenatal) of androgen on relevant
77
neural structures. If highly exposed to these androgens, the fetus will
become masculinized, or attracted to females. This research was conducted
on rats at Stanford. The adult female rats that received male-typical
levels of androgens sufficiently early in development exhibited male
symptoms of attraction. The same was true in the reverse when applied to
the male subjects. The female exposed to high levels of the hormone
exhibited high levels of aggression and sexual drive toward other
females, eventually trying to mount the other females in an act of
reproduction. In the males, the subject who received deficient levels of
androgen became submissive in matters of sexual drive and
reproduction and were willing to receive the sexual act of the other
78
male rat. ” [Emphasis added]

Even though the researchers used rats it should be remembered that the
hypothalamus has the same function in all mammals.

The hypothalamus has the same function in all mammals

Interviewer: What are androgens?

20
QE: Androgens come in two chief forms, testosterone and androstenedione, that
stimulates or controls the development and maintenance of masculine characteristics
in vertebrates by binding to androgen receptors.
79
Now another researcher, A.E. Taylor states :

"Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common reproductive disorder that

is first clinically diagnosable approximately 3 years after menarche. Women
with PCOS have exaggerated gonadotropin secretion, with an elevated
LH/FSH ratio, as well as an increased frequency and amplitude of LH
pulsations. Since the elevated pulse frequency is a marker of unusually rapid
hypothalamic GnRH secretion, these results imply a defect at the level of
the hypothalamus." [Emphasis added]

It was on reading this and taking into account that it has been claimed that up to one
in four women in industrialised countries has certain features of polycystic ovary
syndrome that I wondered about the effects this would have on male-female
relationships.

Interviewer: What do you mean by this?

80
QE: I know for example women in the US initiate divorce twice as often as men and that
men are initially more negative about divorce than women and devote more energy in
attempting to salvage the marriage. The numbers of female solo parents has
increased dramatically over the last three decades or so. Women have become more
aggressive…I suppose some people might use the term “more liberated”.

Interviewer: Are there any “safe levels” regarding Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals?

QE: Research has shown that Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - EDC's - like hormones
themselves require very minute amounts to have physiologic impact. Now it should be
heeded that EDC's are active in parts per trillion! For example, the usual adult
maintenance dose of levothyroxine, a synthetic form of thyroxine to replace depleted
natural thyroid hormone in hypothyroidism, is I believe 1.6 micrograms per kilo of
body weight a day. Now I remember reading somewhere that American children can
consume several milligrams of phthalate each day. Now a milligram is a thousand
times as much as a microgram. Why would anyone consider that a dose in the
milligrams of a known EDC would be safe, especially for a child or developing
foetus?

Animal testing has shown that exposure to even small amounts of BP, as an example
- lower than the levels found in the typical human - can lead to prostate cancer and
breast cancer. Of course the companies involved in the manufacture and selling of
these EDC’s claim that low level exposure is safe but a number of researchers claim
the opposite.

Of course what we have to take into consideration is the fact that humans are
exposed to more than one endocrine disruptor at a time and, therefore, that
synergistic effects cannot be excluded. As an example research done by the USA

21
Environmental Protection Agency’s Health and Environmental Effects Research
Laboratory found that mixing together two types of phthalates at theoretically safe
levels triggered mutations in the reproductive organs of rat foetuses. Now from what I
understand mixtures of phthalates are commonly found in many products including
children's toys.

Now what would the effects be from the contamination of three or four different
phthalates; would the synergistic effect be far greater then the results of just
combining two? Looking at the research done, although it could be claimed it is
limited, I would have to err on the side of safety and say that no safe level of
contamination can be set. The only safe and sane course of action is an immediate
ban of the use of these EDC’s in products that come into contact with food or products
or are handled by the general population. If it was feasible then the use of these
chemicals in other products should be banned or strict safety measures implemented
to ensure that these materials are handled safely by people using them. The health of
society and that of future generations should be of paramount importance.

Oops…nearly forgot. Then we have the influence of soy and soy containing foods and
their proven gender bending effects. Now one good article on soy is "Soy is making
81
kids 'gay'” by Jim Rutz. I will quote a few of the eye-opening points raised by him:

 The root sex problem is that soy is loaded with isoflavones, plant estrogens that
operate like human female estrogen, which occurs naturally in our bodies, male
and female. These "phytoestrogens" cause serious developmental problems.
They're only 1/1,000th to 1/1,200th the potency of human estrogen, ounce for
ounce, but it's common for babies to consume them in such large quantities that
they overwhelm their bodies' delicate testosterone-estrogen balance, leaving their
victim – male or female – with a wild variety of lifelong symptoms, sometimes
82 83 84 85
even disfigurement. - - -
 Toxicologists estimate that an infant fed exclusively on soy formula is getting the
86
equivalent of three to five birth control pills per day. One study found that soy-
fed babies had 13,000 to 22,000 times more estrogen in their blood than milk-fed
87
babies.
 One percent of U.S. girls are now growing breasts or pubic hair before age three.
By age eight, either of these two abnormalities is appearing among 14.7 percent
88
of white girls and a staggering 48.3 percent of black girls. Why so many black
girls? Probably because they are more likely to be given soy infant formula. They
are being robbed of their girlhood. Soy formula-fed girls are also more likely to
have lifelong menstrual problems (primarily longer and more painful periods),
89
hormonal changes associated with infertility, and other health problems.
 The situation is just as bad for boys. Boy babies fed soy formula may go into
puberty late or not at all. Some of these boys are so feminized that their breasts
grow but their penises don't. Some mature into adults with penises not much
bigger than the ones they were born with! Others might look normal and go
through puberty on time, but can't father children because their sperm are too few
90
in number or poor swimmers and thus unable to fertilize eggs.
 Paediatricians are seeing so many over-estrogenized boys today with breasts,
delayed puberty and /or behavioural problems that they've come up with the
terms "Developmental Estrogenization Syndrome" and "Testicular Dysgenesis
91
Syndrome"
 It's not just the sex organs that are affected during the key developmental phases
of pregnancy and infancy. The brain, too, can be irrevocably changed by excess
estrogens, which suppress testosterone. That may contribute to altered sexual
behaviour and sexual preference. Estrogenized males of many species are more
likely to suffer from ADD/ADHD and even to perform more like females on
92 93 94
tests. - -
 One out of every 125 male babies is now born with the once-rare condition called
hypospadias, a gruesome malformity of the penis in which the urethra opening
95
lies somewhere along the underside of the penile shaft instead of at its end.
The penis is also shorter – 2.6 inches shorter in the more severe cases. Overall,
the malformity is associated with homosexuality; one small study showed that 7.6
percent of the control (healthy) subjects were exclusively homosexual compared
with 20.3 percent of those with hypospadias (plus another 15.5 percent who were
96
bisexual).

Now I have given what I consider the major points on the dangers of soy in a
condense form. If you wish to educate yourself further I would suggest starting at a

22
 New Zealand site called SoyOnLine or visit the US site called The Weston A. Price
Foundation.

http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz/

http://www.westonaprice.org/splash_2.htm
Now the ability of soy to decrease Testosterone levels has been well demonstrated.
One study displayed a 76% reduction of Testosterone production in men, after
97
ingestion of soy protein over a brief period of time. In yet another study, an inverse
association was found between soy protein intake and Testosterone levels in
98
Japanese men.
99
In both men and women high estrogen creates infertility.

Now if shooting blanks is worrisome, how about being unable to shoot at all? Two
other recently published papers reveal that at least one soy component clearly impairs
erectile function in animals -and may do so in men as well. The studies, published in
the Journal of Andrology and Urology respectively, looked at the effect of daidzein on
the sexual function of male rats. Moderate doses of the phyto-estrogen administered
either in youth or adulthood significantly affected the quality of their erections. Among
other changes, the daidzein-exposed males produced less testosterone, had softer
erections, and experienced biochemical changes to their penile tissues that left these
tissues less elastic and less capable of complete blood engorgement. The studies,
published in the Journal of Andrology and Urology respectively, looked at the effect of
daidzein on the sexual function of male rats. Moderate doses of the phyto-estrogen
administered either in youth or adulthood significantly affected the quality of their
erections. Among other changes, the daidzein-exposed males produced less
testosterone, had softer erections, and experienced biochemical changes to their
penile tissues that left these tissues less elastic and less capable of complete blood
engorgement. While acknowledging that rat results do not always directly translate to
humans, the authors of the first study suggest that this time there's reason to believe
they will. They cite, among other things, a ten percent higher incidence of erectile
dysfunction in Chinese men known to consume high amounts of soy compared with
100
men who avoid it.

Studies show an alarming number of men who, post puberty, never develop an
101
increase in the flaccid size of their penis. Patients with hypospadias have a total
flaccid penile length of less than 4 centimeters. This has serious implications in
reproduction and in self-esteem for males. In reproduction, when the shaft of the penis
is longer, sperm have less of a distance to travel post ejaculation. This is a problem
that comes to fruition only after puberty; thus, ingestion of phytoestrogens even after
birth, during the pre-pubertal years, can cause reduced development of the penile
102
shaft.

Soy can cause gynecomastia which is the development of abnormally large mammary
103
glands in males resulting in breast enlargement.

Now just recently I found out that the chemicals in soy can also cause "significant
104
testicular cell death."

Interviewer: If soy is as bad as you have stated why is it promoted as being healthy? Also we are
told that soy has always been part of the Asian diet.

QE: Of course those with a vested interest in the promotion of soy will present a different
picture and come-up with all sorts of statistics to create confusion over the claims that

23
 soy is harmful in the quantities being consumed in the West. While male fertility has
been in decline in the West for several decades the levels of soy have risen steadily in
the Western diet since the nineteen-forties. The soy industry has developed into a
multi-billion dollar enterprise with soy-based products found in two-thirds of
manufactured food including biscuits, sweets, pasta and bread, according to the
105
Institute of Food Research in Norwich in the UK. . Sixty percent of the refined foods
106
in U.S. supermarkets now contain soy and the percentage is rising. Australia and
New Zealand also appear to be on par with the UK and the US.

Researchers have shown that isoflavones in soy mimic the female sex hormone
estrogen, and that these isoflavones found in soy are Endocrine Disrupting
Chemicals; there is no doubt about this fact. Now we are meant to believe that if a
male consumes Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals this will not have any affect while he
is developing in his mother's womb, or if he consumes Endocrine Disrupting
Chemicals while growing up this won't have any effect on him? I'm afraid the evidence
from independent researchers shows there is a danger not only to the male but also
the female in regards to these EDCs. So who do we listen to when fears are raised
over its safety; those with a vested interest in the product or independent researchers
who have no vested interest in the product?

Now that bit about the Asian diet. The Asians never ate as much soy as Westerners
think. People in some Asian countries have consumed soy but this was only in small
portions as a condiment or a supplement with a meal i.e. soy sauce, miso, and natto,
etc. Traditionally, soy plants were ploughed under in fields as fertilizer and soy was
only consumed in quantity by the poor in times of famine.

Writings about the soybean date back to 3000 B.C., when the Emperor of China listed
the virtues of soybean plants for regenerating the soil for future crops. Note his
praises centred on the root of the plant, not the bean. About 1000 B.C. the Chinese
discovered that the process of fermentation neutralised the toxins present and made
the nutrients in the beans available to the body; this process lead to the creation of the
still popular foods tempeh, miso, natto, and of course soy sauce. Some time later
another process was discovered that involved coagulating soy, which left most of the
toxins in the discarded liquid, and then pressing the resulting curds into blocks. The
end product was tofu.

It should be noted that the fermentation process only neutralises the natural toxins or
"anti-nutrients" which are potent enzyme inhibitors that block the action of trypsin and
other enzymes needed for protein digestion; the fermentation process does not
neutralise the isoflavones in soy that mimic the female sex hormone estrogen. The
same with the process for coagulating soy; this process removes most of the natural
toxins found in soy but does not remove the isoflavones found in soy.

Now it is my understanding that up to relatively modern times the only time Asians ate
unprocessed Soya beans was in an act of desperation during periods of famine.

Interviewer: So fermented products made from Soya beans are not harmful?

QE: With fermented soy foods, a little goes a long way. The nutrients found in miso,
tempeh, and natto can be beneficial in the moderate amounts found in the typical
Asian diet, but have the potential to do harm in higher amounts. In China and Japan,
about an ounce of fermented soy food is eaten on a daily basis. When fermented soy
foods are used in small amounts they help build the inner ecosystem, providing a
wealth of friendly micro-flora to the intestinal tract that can help with digestion and
107
assimilation of nutrients, and boost immunity. Of course nowadays the biggest
problems associated with fermented soy products comes from the origin of the soy
itself as a major percentage of Soya beans grown are now genetically modified and it
is possible that this unnatural modified products may have unknown long-term
consequences on fertility.

Interviewer: If the decline in fertility is as serious as it appears why isn’t action being done to
investigate its cause and try to reverse the trend before it’s too late?

QE: Why solve this “problem” when the intention is to drastically reduce the world’s
population numbers? Now before I go further let’s take a quick look at how soy was
introduced into the diet of the Western world.

24
 On of the first Westerners to spend a significant amount of time in East Asia studying
soy foods was a Dr. Artemy Alexis Horvath, a Russian scientist. In 1923 Horvath
joined the staff of the Peking University Medical College (PUMC) established by the
Rockefeller Foundation. Working under a Rockefeller grant, he was put in
charge of a new soybean research laboratory and program, which soon began to
108
generate a number of publications on soy foods and nutrition. Horvath was the
author of numerous “scientific” articles about soy foods and wrote a number of books;
his most famous “The Soybean as Human Food,” published in Peking in 1927. In
1927 Horvath moved to the USA where he joined the research staff of the
Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research at Princeton, New Jersey. It is interesting
109
to note that some of his work there was done with the Department of Animal
110
Pathology. He became a consultant to many soy foods producers and soybean
processors and he went on to be a member of the American Soybean Association and
a special associate member of the National Soybean Processors Association.

Interviewer: You say that Dr. Horvath was Russian? It’s not a very Russian sounding name.

QE: Dr. Horvath was born in Russia but from what I understand the surname Horvath is
Jewish. Now according to the SoyInfo Center, in the US, Horvath worked steadily to
help introduce soy-foods, especially soy flour and oil to America and goes on to say
that Horvath had deep knowledge on the subject of Soya beans. Apparently
Horvath‘s research was quite extensive because in 1926 he published "Changes in
the Blood Composition of Rabbits Fed on Raw Soybeans," in which is mentioned the
fact that rabbits developed kidney swelling when fed a diet of soaked raw soybeans.

The interesting question now arise as to why The Rockefellers would finance a
researcher to write various publications praising the virtues of a bean that at the time
was used as an industrial crop in the US? After all it was not like the US was short of
food and needed a miracle crop to fight-off starvation, in fact at this time the US was
producing more food than it could consume.

Interviewer: An industrial crop?

QE: Up until the nineteen-thirties Soya beans were grown for their oil which was used for a
number of industrial purposes.

Now the now questions arise: Did Horvath with his deep knowledge on the subject of
Soya beans know that soy reduced fertility and could cause infertility? Did Horvath
with his deep knowledge on the subject of Soya beans know that soy had a feminism
effect on males and could affect a male’s sexual orientation? Was this the reason why
the Rockefeller Foundation financed Horvath’s research in China and later on in the
US?

"It is widely known throughout Asia that when a woman does

not want to have sexual relations with her husband any more,
she feeds him more and more tofu! Monks in monasteries
needing to be celibate are urged to eat more tofu and soy
products. In Asia, it is common knowledge that soy reduces
sexual urge and ability.”
William Wong ND, PhD. "The Zardoz Effect: The Epidemic of Male Infertility."
http://www.mikemahler.com/articles/wong6.html

It is interesting to note that the decline in fertility in the West did not start until after the
introduction of soy. It is also interesting to note that as soy consumption has increased
since the seventies so has infertility and the apparent increase in sexual disorientation
and sexual abnormality. This is backed-up by a Japanese researcher, M. Fukutake,
who makes a connection between consumption of soy products and a decrease in
111
sperm counts. In his 1996 paper, wherein he noted the fact that affluent nations
with increasing reductions in sperm counts have been consuming increasing
quantities of soy and products containing soy.

It is interesting to note that soy protein has been pushed as the solution to low-cost
112
feeding of the masses. Of course we know the contempt the Rockefellers and their
ilk have towards the Masses e.g. dumb, stupid animals, useless eaters, tacky poor
people – the bottom feeders at the wrong end of the wealth pyramid.

25
 In 1960 a good sperm count was considered to be 120 million
sperm per millilitre of seminal fluid. Anything lower than that
and a man was considered to be only marginally fertile. These
days, things have become so bad that a man is considered
fertile if he has only 20 million sperm per millilitre of ejaculate!
William Wong ND, PhD. "The Zardoz Effect: The Epidemic of Male Infertility."
http://www.mikemahler.com/articles/wong6.html

Now you might be prepared to give the Rockefellers the benefit of the doubt, but I am
too cynical to do so, especially knowing the history of the Rockefellers and their
connections to eugenics and population control.

Interviewer: Well…based on my knowledge of the Rockefellers and what you have stated
previously about population reduction I can see the logic in your conclusion.

By 2045 only 21% of the men on the entire planet will be fertile.
Doris J. Rapp MD "Is This Your Childs World" page 501

QE: Now I am not claiming that soy is solely responsible for the decline in fertility; the
evidence also points to the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals found in plastics are also
contributing factors.

Taking the rate of decline in fertility over the last two decades it would not be
unreasonable to consider the possibility of a synergistic effect between the
consummation of products containing soy and the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in
plastic. Whether studies have been done regarding this I do not know. I certainly
haven’t come across any such research during my investigations.

Oops nearly forgot to mention that artificial sweeteners have also been associated
with infertility.

Aspartame, also known under the brand names as Equal, NutraSweet, Equal-
Measure, Spoonful, has been shown in a number of studies to “reduced fertility in both
males and females - shrunken testes and ovaries were seen in the original studies by
the makers of aspartame... we see reduction in the gonadotrophins-ICSH, FSH, LH
113
and prolactin. In addition there are direct effects on the sperm and ova."

Splenda also known as sucralose has been linked to increased male infertility and in
experiments has caused infertility issues in both male and female rats.

Aspartame was invented by the G D Searle Co. acquired by Monsanto in 1985

Splenda was co-developed by Tate & Lyle and Johnson & Johnson

Interviewer: But I thought that Splenda is made from ordinary cane sugar?

QE: Splenda is in fact a synthetic chemical made from sucrose a.k.a. sugar by adding
three chlorine molecules to the sucrose molecule. So in fact Splenda is a synthetic
sugar molecule that does not occur in nature, and therefore your body does not
possess the ability to properly metabolise it.

Now I don't wish to come across as being paranoid but when one investigates the
history of the companies involved in soy, the promotion of fluoridation, and artificial
sweeteners in the US, one discovers a connection with various private organisations
that also support population reduction, such as the Council on Foreign Relations. If we
look further we see a connection between these private organisations, the wealth
elite, and the various foundations promoting population reduction under the guise of
"reproductive health" i.e. abortion, sterilization, and contraception, long with "gay
rights". Now when one connects all the dots a certain picture is formed...now is this
picture incorrect...I mean is this just coincidence or does this picture reflect an
agenda?

As I said before why solve this “problem” of falling infertility and sexual dysfunction
when the intention is to drastically reduce the world’s population numbers? After all,

26
 all we hear is that the world has a PROBLEM because there are too many people.
114
Even recently an article in the Dominion Post on a newly released UN Population
report stated “urgent action has to be undertaken to reduce fertility rates.” Now I would
like to comment on this article and then I would like to explain the hidden purpose
behind the plans to reduce CO2 emissions.

Interviewer: Please go ahead.

QE: The article based on the UN Population report stated: “It revealed that, contrary to
received wisdom, rates of unintended pregnancies were higher in rich countries than
in poor ones. In Europe, the United States, Australia, Canada, Japan and New
Zealand, an average of 41 per cent of pregnancies were unintended…” Now the
purpose of any propaganda is to mislead and this statement even though it might be
factual certainly misleads people into thinking that these countries have a population
problem when in fact all these countries have a low birth-rate well below replacement
rate. But I must give credit where credit is due at least the report admitted that Japan’s
population was expected to fall even though it did not acknowledge that Japan’s birth-
rate has been below replacement levels for sometime. But on the other hand it stated
that the US population was expected to increase without mentioning that the US birth-
rate is below replacement levels and that this increase would come from immigration.

Now the article had four paragraphs that I found most revealing:

1. BRITAIN: Investing in birth control to reduce population growth could be

more effective in cutting greenhouse gas emissions than building wind
turbines or nuclear power stations. [Emphasis added]
2. The report said reducing population growth would allow the 2050 target for
global average emissions per person to be increased significantly above
two tonnes. [Emphasis added]
3. “No human is genuinely carbon neutral,” the report said. “Therefore,
everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in
some way. Each birth results not only in the emission attributable to
that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her
descendents.” [Emphasis added]
4. The report said that population growth was only beginning to be
recognised as an important topic in international negotiations on climate
change. [Emphasis added]

The claim in the report that “population growth was only beginning to be recognised
as an important topic” is blatantly untrue as the whole climate change issue right from
its conception was a tool to be used to reduce population numbers.

Of course when this is supported by influential writers such as Diane Francis one
begins to get an uneasy feeling and begins to wonder where this is all leading,
115
especially when she states that a "planetary law, such as China's one-child policy"
is needed and nothing "will work unless a China one-child policy is imposed." Now
notice the she says "planetary law”.

"Socialism should make it possible to regulate the reproduction of human

beings. We should be able to produce human beings under a quota system,
just as we produce bicycles and tons of steel."
Vice Premier Chan Muhua, Head of China's Family Planning Board, 1979
Steven W. Mosher “Broken Earth: The Rural Chinese”
Chen Muhua's quote is on page 224.

If one does an in-depth study on how the over-population myth developed one must
conclude that the pre World War Two eugenics movement has been repackaged and
presented as saving the world from the ravages of over-population. The whole man-
made climate warming myth is just a cloak to disguise the real purpose which is the
introduction of a programme of depopulation on a global scale.

Let’s put it this way. If the main players promoting the reduction of carbon dioxide
output were Nazis who believe in reducing the numbers of “the tacky poor people" -
you know “undesirables” - and the result of the plan they promoted enhanced their
agenda to reduce the number of “undesirables” then the Left would be up in arms
doing their best to derail the plan along with exposing the Nazis as barbaric. But alas

27
 because this plan is hidden under layers of noble causes and promoted by powerful
people who have virtually unlimited wealth at their disposal to propagandize their
ambitions as a noble course; people who can afford to purchase the best PR people
money can buy to front their program, thus many are blinded to the true nature and
goals of the plans to reduce CO2 output. The Left and the environmentalists have
been duped as “useful idiots”, as Lenin would say, and thus are blinded to the fact that
they are being used.

The plan to reduce carbon dioxide output is nothing more then a cover for what can
only be referred to as the Final Solution; a hidden plan to reduce the numbers of the
“tacky poor” people in the world.

“The notion that the world would be a much better place if all the tacky poor
people in it would simply control their reproductive urges is hardly new. It has
long been accepted wisdom among social elites. And while no one could deny
that Vice President Al Gore is - by birth, upbringing and lifestyle - a full fledged
member of the American aristocracy, it was still strange to hear just how blunt
Mr. Gore is prepared to be on the subject of what to do to get rid of extra
people.” [Emphasis added]
THE WASHINGTON TIMES, October 9, 1997

Alas, once the need to reduce CO2 is accepted and policies introduced to bring about
this reduction, this will slowly lead to the introduction of draconian measures. The
world will eventually become a global concentration camp, with an elite governing
body, an administrative bureaucracy, along with its police enforcing the “law” and
keeping order amongst the inmates. Of course your social status in this concentration
camp will depend on your personal allotment of carbon credits which will depend on
your submissiveness and usefulness to the Elites running the Global System.

Interviewer: Isn’t that a rather…emotive and a rather extreme statement to make?

QE: It may well be that I spoke in an emotional way but that shouldn’t distract from the
points I put across. In regards to the statement being extreme…well…the reality of a
situation when put bluntly can sound rather extreme to some people especially if they
have no understanding or only a little knowledge of the matter being discussed.

In regards to the average person’s knowledge on the long term impact on their lives
from the Master Plan to reduce CO2 output…they have no comprehension.

Have the politicians told the people that the only way CO2 reduction can be
implemented is by limiting the carbon footprint of each individual? Has it been
explained that the only way this can be accomplished is by issuing a certain number
of carbon credits to each individual and tracking their use through a Carbon Card? Do
people realise that such a Carbon Card will be in effect an IDENTIFICATION CARD?
The only question that now needs answering is whether this ID card will be controlled
through a national database or a global database? My feeling is that this Carbon Card
will eventually be tied into a global database

Do people realise that when such a card is introduced it will not be possible to
purchase anything without first presenting your Carbon Card to allow the carbon
footprint of the item purchased to be deducted from their carbon allowance?

Taking this a bit further then it would be logical for all businesses to be issue with a
carbon identification number to track their carbon footprint, meaning that a business
would not be able to trade, i.e. buy and sell, without joining and being compliant to
such a scheme.

Of course thinking logically the next step would be do away with cash and have a
cashless society in which the Carbon Card is used for all transactions thus eliminating
fraud within the system and forcing compliance upon everyone.

Now I suppose what I have just stated would be considered a rather wild and extreme
statement to make…but hey, before rejecting what I say, let’s consider a few facts
plus look at some highlights from a number of news items and statements from
influential people on this matter.

28
 Firstly let’s start with John P. Holdren, who was on December 20, 2008, appointed by
US President Obama as Director of the White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-
Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. In the book
"Ecoscience: Population, Resources and Environment," last revised in 1977, which
Holdren co-authored together with co-authors Paul and Anne Ehrlich, he advocates
some rather extreme totalitarian measures to control the population. Some of the
points in the book:

 Social pressures on both men and women to marry and have children must
be removed. Page 786
 The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put
into the nation's drinking water or in food. Pages 787 – 788
 Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to
or not. Page 837
 People should be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility.
Page 838
 He seems to support what he refers to as a Planetary Regime to control the
development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural
resources, renewable or non-renewable. He hints at this Planetary Regime
being given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the
world and that the Regime should have power to enforce the agreed limits.
Pages 942 – 943

Now in an earlier booklet published in 1971, co-authored with Malthusian population

alarmist Paul Ehrlich, Holdren predicted that global over-population was heading the
Earth to a new ice age unless the government mandated urgent measures to control
population, including the possibility of involuntary birth control measures such as
forced sterilization.

It is most interesting to note that John P. Holdren is a member of the Council on

116
Foreign Relations From 1991 to 2005, Holdren served as a member of the Board
of Trustees of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, helping shape
that foundation’s programs on international peace and cooperation, environment, and
117 118
population with a special focus on Mexico, Nigeria, and Russia.

Now since I have mentioned the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation it
should be noted that this same organisation along with the Ford Foundation and the
Rockefellers gave financial assistance to the Chinese in the form of research grants
to help the Chinese formulate and implement their one child policy.

That aside it should be of interest to note that Holdren also sat on the international
advisory board of Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs along side
Tom Foley who is the North American chairman of the Trilateral Commission, John
M. Deutch who was a former US Director of Central Intelligence, and Nathaniel
119
Rothschild.

Regardless if the alarm bells were rang over global cooling or global warming the
underlying concern was and still is over-population and the only solution to the
problem was and still is the reduction of population numbers. Now this man Holdren
currently holds a very high advisory position in the US government and he has
expressed views that are held by many powerful and influential people in the world.
What is also of significance is that Holdren talks of the need for a “Planetary Regime”
to control population in his book “Ecoscience"

Now this “Planetary Regime” talked about by Holdren over three decades ago
appears to be on the verge of becoming a reality if what Lord Christopher Monckton
claims is correct.

Interviewer: Who is Lord Christopher Monckton?

QE: He is a British politician, business consultant, policy adviser, writer, columnist,

inventor, and hereditary peer. He served as an advisor to Margaret Thatcher's policy
unit in the 1980s and invented the Eternity puzzle at the end of the 1990s. More
recently, he has attracted controversy for his public opposition to the mainstream
scientific consensus on climate change.

29
 120
As I was about to say… Monckton has warned that the Copenhagen climate
change treaty represents a global government power grab on an “unimaginable
scale,” which mandates the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal
raft of new taxes including two percent levies on both GDP and every international
financial transaction. He is quoted as saying; “Once again they are desperately trying
to conceal from everybody here the magnitude of what they’re attempting to do – they
really are attempting to set up a world government,” adding that the word
“government” was no longer used but the process of further centralization of power
into global hands was clearly spelled out in the treaty.

Now Monckton's mention of power grab on an “unimaginable scale,” brings to mind

that Simon Linnett, the Executive Vice-Chairman of Rothschild, was pushing back at
the beginning of 2008 when he called for a new international body, the World
Environment Agency, to regulate carbon trading. In a paper entitled "Trading
121
Emissions - Full global potential", for the Social Market Foundation, Linnett argued
that the international problem of climate change demands an international solution
and that unless governments ceded some of their sovereignty to a new world body
122
that the global carbon trading scheme could not be enforced and regulated.

Now at this point I feel that I have to repeat what I have stated at an earlier time to
press home a point about the hoax of man-made climate change and its connection to
reducing population numbers.

As I stated in the section “Climate Change” the Director of the Carnegie Institution’s
Department of Global Ecology, Christopher Field, had been elected co-chair of
Working Group 2 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He was formerly
a coordinating lead author on the 2007 IPCC report, Impacts, Adaptation, and
Vulnerability to Climate Change but now Field will be leading the group as they
develop their next major report on climate change impacts, adaptation, and
vulnerability, due in 2014.

Now since this Carnegie Institution is supplying the head bureaucrat who is playing
a major role in shaping policy that is going to affect most people throughout the world I
gave a brief rundown of the Carnegie Institution’s history and the people associated
with it. The highlights are as follows:

 It was a private organisation founded by Andrew Carnegie in Washington in 1902

to fund educational, religious, and political organizations to "cultivate the
international mind" - the Carnegie Institution was just one of twenty-two different
organisations that he created. It should be noted that Andrew Carnegie was a
close associate of the Rockefellers.
 The first head of the Carnegie Institution was Daniel Coit Gilman who established
The Russell Trust in 1856. The Russell Trust is the business name for the Skull
and Bones society. Skull and Bones is a secret society based at Yale University,
in New Haven, Connecticut. Also known as The Brotherhood of Death, also
known as Chapter 322 or simply The Order, the powerful secret society that was
established at Yale University for the elite children or grandchildren of the Wall
Street Banking Establishment. Therefore it is more than a mere student fraternity
for high jinx, as it only recruits from those in their final year at Yale, the potential
business and political leaders, and thereafter meets as a conspiratorial "old boys’
network".
 It is interesting to note that a 1911 study, financed by the Carnegie Institution,
identified eighteen possible methods of implementing eugenics in America and
around the world. Gas chambers were deemed to be the most effective method,
but it was felt that American society was not yet prepared to accept them. Thus, a
number of other eugenic methods were adopted, most notably mass sterilization.
American Eugenics was conceived at the onset of the twentieth century and was
implemented by America’s wealthiest, most powerful, most learned and most
influential individuals and institutions, including the Carnegie Institution and the
Rockefeller Foundation.
 Robert S. Woodward was president of the Institution from 1904 to 1920, and
helped to plan the Second International Congress of Eugenics.
 John C. Merriam was president of the Institution from 1921 to 1938. Merriam was
a founding member of the Galton Society, founded in New York City in 1918; it
was the most overtly racist of the American eugenics organizations.
 Caryl P. Haskins was president of the Institution from 1956 to 1971. Haskins was
a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

30
  Philip Abelson was president of the Institution from 1971 to1978. Abelson was a
member of the United States Association for the Club of Rome.
 Richard A. Meserve became the ninth president of the Carnegie Institution in April
2003, after stepping down as chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission. Meserve is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

But should we be concern about the Carnegie Institution shady history? I suppose
this information taken by it self doesn’t prove any future intention. Now we know that
the Carnegie Institution has a strong influence on the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change and we know that the IPCC is joined at the hip with the United
Nations Organisation Now when we dig deeper and examine the Unite Nations
Organisation we must in all fairness become alert to the possibility that something is
amiss.

For example the first director of UNESCO, Julian Huxley, stated on page 21 of the
publication he authored in 1946, “UNESCO ITS PURPOSE AND ITS PHILOSOPHY”:

"Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for
many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for
Unesco to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care,
and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that
now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable."

UNESCO ITS PURPOSE AND ITS PHILOSOPHY by JULIAN HUXLEY is still

available in its entirety from the Unesco website [LINK]. If this link is dead you
may download the document from here [LINK].

Interviewer: You mention eugenics and population reduction in the same breath…how can you
equate them both?

QE: Because eugenics was repackage and presented as a crusade against “over-
population”.

Interviewer: Why was eugenics repackaged and how was this done?
123
QE: According to James Corbett, at of the end of the Second World War the word
eugenics had become tainted…I suppose it would be better to say the word eugenics
became a dirty word. So a need arose to repackage the whole concept of eugenics
and that is what was done. Now how was this done? For example the American
Eugenics Society morphed into the Population Council, a group set up by John D.
Rockefeller the third, and the British Eugenics Education Society merely changed its
name to The Galton Institute. Of course the old battle of fighting “bad genes” was
dropped for the new crusade launched against “over-population”.

This fact was highlighted by the feminist author Germaine Greer in her book “Sex and
Destiny” when she wrote:

"It now seems strange that men who had been conspicuous in the eugenics
movement were able to move quite painlessly into the population
establishment at the highest level, but if we reflect that the paymasters were
the same - Ford, Mellon, Du Pont, Standard Oil, Rockefeller and Shell -
are still the same, we can only assume that people like Kingsley Davis,
Frank W. Notestein, C.C. Little, E.A. Ross, the Osborns Frederick and
Fairfield, Philip M. Hauser, Alan Guttmacher and Sheldon Segal were
being rewarded for past services." [Emphasis added]

Now take for example the name Frederick Osborn that was just quoted. According to
124
Eugenics Watch he was the dominant figure in the eugenics movement in the
United States. In 1956, he said people "won't accept the idea that they are in general,
second rate. We must rely on other motivation." He called the new motivation "a
system of voluntary unconscious selection." The way to persuade people to exercise
this voluntary unconscious selection was to appeal to the idea of "wanted" children.
Osborn said, "Let's base our proposals on the desirability of having children born in
homes where they will get affectionate and responsible care." In this way, the
125
eugenics movement "will move at last towards the high goal which Galton set for it."

31
Interviewer: Where and when did eugenics originate?

QE: Most people believe that eugenics originated in Nazi Germany but the fact is the
concept of eugenics came out of England and was conceived by an Englishman by
the name of Francis Galton who was the cousin of Charles Darwin, yes the same
Charles Darwin that wrote “Origin of Species” dealing with the Theory of Evolution. It
appears that after Darwin published his “Origin of Species” Galton became fascinated
with the idea that the "survival of the fittest" did not just take place between species,
but within them.

The idea developed into a study of the characteristics of various racial and social
groups with an aim to explaining why the various peoples of the world occupy the
positions they do. Galton invented the term eugenics in 1883 and set down many of
his observations and conclusions in the book "Inquiries into human faculty and its
development".
126
According to James Corbett;

”Unsurprisingly, the promoters of eugenics concluded that the rich and

powerful were rich and powerful because they were genetically superior, and
it offered a simple solution for improving the lot of humanity: make sure that
the affluent upper classes breed as much as possible (preferably within their
own families, in order to preserve their superior stock), and make sure the
lower classes breed as little as possible.”

It is interesting to note that Galton was knighted in 1909 and thereafter bore the title of
Sir Francis Galton, so his views could not have been the repugnant to the British Elite.
This is not all the surprising taking into account that eugenics was not aimed at
royalty, the aristocracy, or the moneyed elite; it was something to be applied against
the Masses, the people at the bottom of the wealth pyramid.

Logo from the Second International Eugenics Conference, 1921, depicting it as a tree
which unites a variety of different fields.

Of course many of the "respectable" organisations leading this battle against the
“burden of over-population” talk of "reproductive health" which is politically correct
slang for contraception, sterilization, and abortion. Organisations such as the
Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Gates Foundation, Kaiser Family
Foundation, WestWind Foundation; the list goes on and on. And what have all
these organisations have in common…for a start they have all been established by
the wealthy elite who consider themselves like some modern day aristocracy, they are
all involved in promoting various environmental issues, and most if not all promote
"gay rights."

32
Interviewer: You state that the wealthy elite consider themselves like some modern day
aristocracy…do you really believe this?

QE: Well I will try and put it in very simple terms so that you can comprehend where I am
coming from so-to-speak.

Through my life I have known a number of people who have come from a working
class background and who were raised in a working class environment. Of course
when they became adults some of them accumulated wealth either from speculative
ventures or because they went into some sort of businesses venture. Now I can
honestly say that without exception all these people who “bettered themselves” now
consider themselves superior then their poorer working class brethren they knew
when they were growing up. They have developed a mentality that an individual’s
status depends on their wealth. Of course they no longer have any desire to live in a
working class area; in fact they want to live in a well-to-do area away from the riff-raff
and amongst the “better” people. Of course when these people with the same status
get together they complain about the taxes they have to pay and moan about the
poorer people in society being a burden on the system.

Now this trait, this feeling of superiority or perceived status based on wealth, is
generally exhibited by most people; of course there are a few rare exceptions put
generally, from my observation, this feeling of superiority derived from wealth appears
to be the rule.

Of course this feeling of superiority based on wealth grows stronger and becomes
more dominate as you rise upwards through the wealth pyramid. Now if you divide this
wealth pyramid I talk about into various levels or strata representing various ranks of
wealth you will find that individuals in the higher levels look upon those in the
preceding levels with some degree of disdain.

Of course the higher up the wealth pyramid the more intense this feeling of superiority
becomes. Of course within the higher levels of the wealth pyramid the individuals
become so full of their perceived importance they believe that they are a sort of
aristocracy and act accordingly. These people honestly feel that they are superior and
the Masses that they dominate are inferior. Doubt what I say…Well let’s take a quick
look to see if there is some substance to what I state.

I suppose we can kick-off with the statement from:

 Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, and patron of the World Wildlife Fund,
wrote in the foreword to Fleur Cowles 1986 book If I Were an Animal; "In the
event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order
to contribute something to solve overpopulation.” Now taking into account
that he has four children one most wonder that if he ever got his wish - as
being reincarnated as a killer virus - if he would target some of his own
children or grandchildren. But I suppose when he made that statement he
was thinking more along the lines of targeting the more “poor tacky people”
in the world.
 And talking of “poor tacky people” brings us to Al Gore. Yes here is a man
with a giant carbon footprint, preaching about the need to reduce population
numbers, and yet lives in a twenty room mansion and has four children.
 David Rockefeller Sr., now deceased, Club of Rome executive member and
founder of the Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations member,
and attendee of various elitist Bilderberg Group meetings; he had six
children.
 Then we have David Lionel de Rothschild; head of Adventure Ecology which
describes itself as "a leader in Education for Sustainable Development".
While Rothschild is presented as an environmental warrior it is interesting to
note that he has three children.
 Next we have the multibillionaire Bill Gates who has three children.
 Next is billionaire Maurice F. Strong, world renown environmentalist and
population reductionist; he has four children.
 And of course we cannot forget to mention CNN founder and multibillionaire
Ted Turner. Turner is a member of the Society of the Pacifica House, the
secret society of Brown University which is very similar to the Skull and
Bones at Yale University; it is interesting to note that Turner is also a long-
time member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Turner is also UN

33
 supporter and founder of the United Nations Foundation. He was quoted
as saying; "Personally, I think the population should be closer to when we
had indigenous populations, back before the advent of farming. Fifteen
thousand years ago, there was somewhere between 40 and 100 million
people. But [population researchers] Paul and Anne Ehrlich have convinced
me that if we're going to have a modern infrastructure, with commercial
airlines and interstate highways around the world, we're going to need about
127
two billion people to support it." In an interview with The Atlanta Journal-
Constitution he stated; "We're too many people; that's why we have global
warming," and that "everybody in the world's got to pledge to themselves that
128
one or two children is it." It should be noted that Ted Turner has five
children.

Now I hope if you forgive me if the saying “Don’t do as I do, DO AS I SAY” pops into
my head. These people are nothing but arrogant, self-centred hypocrites and I believe
that Henry Kissinger, who is often referred to as the New World Order Ambassador,
sums up the real contempt the wealthy elite feel in general towards the Masses when
he stated that; “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in
129
foreign policy.”

"Habit, if not resisted, soon becomes necessity."

St. Augustine

Interviewer: I find it strange that Bill Gates would support “gay rights” I thought that he was
considered relatively conservative?
130
QE: According to LifeSiteNews in July 2007 Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates acquired a
major stake in a homosexual activist publishing company. “SEC Filings reveal that
Cascade Investment, which invests Gates' money, is among a group of investors that
has bought a $26.2 million share in PlanetOut, a publishing company which runs Out
magazine as well as the dating website Gay.com which is used primarily for sexual
"hook-ups" and all-gay RSVP Cruises. . . The online material put out by PlanetOut
also features hard core homosexual pornography.”

Interviewer: I am most surprised…Now I should have asked before so I better ask you now...You
stated that many of the foundations pushing population control and population
reduction also promote “gay right”…why do they promote “gay rights” after all many of
these people who have donated vast sums of money to these foundations don’t
appear to be “gay” as most appear to be married with children?

QE: For a start homosexuals rarely have families thus homosexuality helps to reduce
population growth. Don’t forget these foundations have two prime objectives and they
are to curb population growth and to reduce population numbers. The promotion of
“gay rights” along with homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle fits into and helps the
agenda of these foundations.

The continued promotion of “gay rights” and homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle

also undermines the traditional concept of family and family values which fits in with
their new global values for the Masses. Of course as more and more people are
conditioned into accepting homosexuality as a normal part of society less questions
are asked about what is causing the apparent increasing numbers of homosexuals.

Raise any questions that are considered negative about homosexuality and you are
attacked as homophobic and thus no rational debate or investigation can take place.

Now there is no scientific evidence that sexual orientation can be changed but there is
plenty of evidence to show it can be arranged.

There is no scientific evidence that sexual

orientation can be changed but there is plenty of
evidence to show it can be arranged

34
 Currently there is plenty of scientific evidence that points to the fact that
homosexuality is not genetic but that it is the result of foetal exposure to chemicals,
during a critical time of development, resulting in a retardation of normal sexual
orientation. It would appear to me that if the question of rising homosexual numbers
can not be investigated in a rational manner, without the investigator being verbally
attacked and harassed and made to look unreasonable by being accused of being
homophobic, then the question of chemicals affecting normal sexual orientation would
be unlikely to be pursued with vigour or in a rational manner free of corrupting
influences.

Scientific evidence points to the fact that homosexuality is not

genetic but that it is the result of foetal exposure to chemicals,
during a critical time of development, resulting in a retardation
of normal sexual orientation

Interviewer: Your statement could well be considered paranoid by some people.

QE: Paranoid..? If you have an agenda and you promote something that fits in with your
agenda then I cannot be called paranoid for pointing this out. Cripes if someone saw a
known arsonist with an empty can of fuel in their hands walking away from a burning
building you certainly could not label someone paranoid for thinking the arsonist may
have been involved somehow with the fire. The same applies to the foundations we
were talking about. Look at what they promote and look at the people and
organisations they associate with.

Interviewer: Fair enough…I see the point you make.

“Eugenic goals are most likely to be achieved under another name

than eugenics.”
FREDERICK OSBORN "The Future of Human Heredity" 1968, pp.104

QE: And of course we cannot forget the role the United Nations Organisation has played

If you jog your memory you will remember that I mention in the section “Domination:
Obsession & Power” that in the 1990’s the UN’s World Health Organization launched
a campaign to vaccinate millions of women of child-bearing age in Nicaragua, Mexico
and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45 against tetanus. The strange thing
was that vaccine was not given to men or boys, despite the fact they are also prone to
becoming infected with the tetanus bacterium. Because of that curious anomaly the
Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, became suspicious
and had vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the tetanus vaccine being
distributed by the World Health Organization only to women of child-bearing age
contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone which when
combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman
incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. Now understand…this was no accident…the
only way the hCG contaminate could have got into the tetanus vaccine was if it was
wilfully put there.

Now in the section “Domination: Obsession & Power” also covered the subject of the
World Health Organisation encouraging virologists and molecular biologists to work
with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an immunosuppressive hybrid virus
that would be deadly to humans and I mentioned that William Campbell Douglass,
M.D., in his book, “AIDS: The End of Civilization” bluntly blaming the World Health
Organization for murdering Africa by lacing African vaccines with the AIDS virus.

Now keeping these facts in mind let’s look at some statements emanating from some
influential people pushing the man-made global warming bandwagon and CO2
reduction to see if there is an underlying theme between this and population
reduction.

Interviewer: You have certainly whetted my appetite…so fire away.

QE: Right…as I stated there a number of statements emanating from a number of

influential organisations and individuals who strongly support the reduction in man-

35
 made CO2 output and who in their enthusiasm have given a strong indication to what
future action will need to be taken if the goals that have been set are to be obtained.
Take for example a proposal put forwarded by the Australian Professor Barry Walters.
His proposal, reported in the Medical Journal of Australia, called for parents to be
charged $5000 a head for every child after their second, and an annual tax of up to
$800. He also proposed that couples who were sterilised should be eligible for carbon
credits and went on to state that the “debate [around population control] needs to be
131
reopened as part of a second ecological revolution."
132
It was reported in the UK paper The Sunday Times that Jonathon Parritt, a patron
of the Optimum Population Trust and one of Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s leading
green advisers, has warned that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to
build a sustainable society. He was quoted as calling "for Britain to cut population to
30m - roughly what it was in late Victorian times." Parritt went on to state that: “Each
person in Britain has far more impact on the environment than those in developing
countries so cutting our population is one way to reduce that impact.” Now take note;
he is talking about the need to reduce the UK’s population numbers by over a half.

Now before I go on it should be noted that the Optimum Population Trust counts as
its patrons Jane Goodall who is a member of the Club of Rome, Sir Crispin Tickell
who is also a member of the Club of Rome and former chairman of the Gaia Society,
and Dr. James Lovelock the scientist responsible for the Gaia theory. Another
interesting OPT patron is Partha Dasgupta, who is a university fellow of the
133
controversial Ford and Rockefeller initiated group, Resources for the Future
which was formed in 1952 by the Ford Foundation. That aside I shall continue.

In an article written by Dr. James Lovelock in the UK newspaper The Sunday Times
134
Lovelock states: “The high-sounding and well-meaning visions of the European
Union of ‘saving the planet’ and developing sustainability by using only “natural”
energy might have worked in 1800 when there were only a billion of us, but now they
are a wholly impractical luxury we can ill afford.” He goes on to say: "No voluntary
human act can reduce numbers enough even to slow climate change. Merely by
existing, people and their dependent animals are responsible for more than 10 times
the greenhouse emissions of all the airline travel in the world."
135
In a statement issued in August 2009, the Optimum Population Trust "called on
climate change negotiators to ensure that population restraint policies are adopted
by every state worldwide to combat climate change." In another News Release
136
issued in September 2009 the Optimum Population Trust states: "Contraception is
almost five times cheaper than conventional green technologies as a means of
combating climate change"
137
An article in UK newspaper The Guardian announced a scheme called
“PopOffsets” whereby consumers in the developed world are to be offered a method
of offsetting their carbon emissions by paying for contraception measures in poorer
countries. The article states: “The scheme - set up by [The Optimum Population Trust]
an organisation backed by Sir David Attenborough, the former diplomat Sir Crispin
Tickell and green figureheads such as Jonathon Porritt and James Lovelock - argues
that family planning is the most effective way to reduce the likelihood of catastrophic
global warming.” The article then mentions the cost-benefit “analysis commissioned
by the trust claims that family planning is the cheapest way to reduce carbon
emissions. Every £4 spent on contraception, it says, saves one tonne of CO2 being
added to global warming, but a similar reduction in emissions would require an £8
investment in tree planting, £15 in wind power, £31 in solar energy and £56 in hybrid
vehicle technology.” The article also mentions that calculations “based on the trust's
figures show the 10 tonnes emitted by a return flight from London to Sydney would be
offset by enabling the avoidance of one unwanted birth in a country such as Kenya.”
Of course no mention was made in regards to who did not want this “unwanted
birth”…the mother of the unborn child or Sir David Attenborough and company?

Interviewer: I must admit that this sounds good coming from people who have a lifestyle and
carbon foot-print that most Kenyans can only dream about.

QE: I would have to agree with you. These types would have a carbon foot-print
thousands, if not tens of thousands, times greater then the average Kenyan. No these
people like Attenborough and Co are just arrogant, hypocritical, and self-centred

36
 people who believe that they are superior to the Masses; an attitude most common
among the world’s wealthy elite.
138
Now The Guardian article I just mentioned also stated that UN “scientists” say
global carbon emissions must have reduced by at least 80% by 2050 "meaning the
carbon footprint of each citizen in 2050 will have to be very low."

"Aristocrats have us believing that our planet is dying, pandemics are

forthcoming, nuclear annihilation is probable, and that we must think and do
exactly as they tell us to do in order to survive. . . Aristocrats believe in
supremacy. They always have and they still do. Aristocrats despise the
common man and consider him to be a lesser species, which is why
commoners have been steadfastly and continually used as guinea pigs for
aristocrats and their inventions."
139
Nancy Levant "DEPOPULATION AND THE AMERICAN MUTTS - PART 1"

Interviewer: So if CO2 output is to be reduced so drastically how is it to be accomplished?

QE: As I mentioned before people well be eventually issued with a Carbon Card and a
Carbon Allowance. This Carbon Allowance will have a sinking lid, meaning that over a
period the Carbon Allowance well be steadily reduced.

Interviewer: Are you implying that this Carbon Card well be compulsory?

QE: Of course.

Interviewer: Taking into account that a large segment of population is doubtful about man being
responsible for global warming surely there would be quite an amount of resistance to
the implementation of such a scheme?

QE: It will be announced that everyone is to be issued with this card and at a specified
date in the future it will have to be used. Now the card arrives in the post. You open
the envelope and there is the Card with your name on it including your unique
personal ID number. What are people going to do? Send it back; throw it away? One
day in the near future when the compulsory use of the card arrives very few people
will be able to survive without using the Card. NO CARD - NO FOOD, NO
ELECTRICITY, NO FUEL, and NO TRAVEL.

Of course there well be resistance but with some slick propaganda most people will
willingly or with reservations accept and use the Carbon Card. And in regards to
businesses, well they will have to comply or cease trading.

Of course there well be resistance but with some slick propaganda

most people will willingly or with reservations accept and use the
Carbon Card. And in regards to businesses, well they will have to
comply or cease trading.

Don’t forget that a large percentage of private financial transactions today are with
either credit cards or EFTPOS cards. Of course loyalty cards or reward cards, you
know the different cards that can be swiped when you purchase something giving you
points that can be accumulated and used to purchase items etc, have been around for
a while. Now there is quite a wide acceptance of these cards so people have been
pretty well conditioned in using these cards so the introduction of a Carbon Card
wouldn’t appear to be too strange to many people.

Interviewer: Has there been any mention about this Carbon Card in New Zealand before now…I
mean if it is the intention to introduce such a card in New Zealand one would believe it
would have been mentioned before now?

QE: The only mention I have been able to find on this matter in New Zealand publications
140
was in an article in the Listener about two years ago. Of course the Carbon Card
has been mentioned in a number of countries overseas, especially in the UK. In fact
from what I understand a number of countries are running volunteer schemes, nothing
on a massive scale, but never-the-less a number of schemes are in existence.

37
Interviewer: What you have just stated is rather disturbing.

QE: I think it gives a preview of what is intended to be implemented. And the

implementation of such a scheme is being backed by some very powerful people.

The intention to introduce a Carbon Card has been endorsed by the UK Environment
Secretary David Miliband. It should be noted that David Miliband is the elder son of
Jewish immigrants Marion Kozak and the late Marxist intellectual Ralph Miliband. It
is interesting to note that in December 2007, Miliband stood in for Prime Minister,
Gordon Brown at the official signing ceremony in Lisbon of the EU Reform Treaty,
which was attended by all other European heads of government. This should prove
141 142
his important political ranking. An article on the BBC website in December 2006
had Secretary David Miliband who had commissioned a feasibility study Carbon
"credit cards" as stating that the scheme could be working within five years - 2011 - as
part of a nationwide carbon rationing scheme. The article went on to say that Miliband
insisted that climate change required "cumulative, consistent radicalism" rather than
"one shot wonders". Miliband went on to say that climate change was “the mass
mobilising movement of our age". The “environmental” group Friends of the Earth
was quoted as saying that the principle of using a limited "budget" of carbon per
person was sound.

“The Sierra Club made the Nature Conservancy look

reasonable. I founded Friends of the Earth to make the Sierra
Club look reasonable. Then I founded Earth Island Institute to
make Friends of the Earth look reasonable. Earth First! now
makes us look reasonable. We’re still waiting for someone else
to come along and make Earth First! look reasonable.”
David Brower, quoted by Ron Arnold and Alan Gottlieb in their book “Trashing
the Economy” (1993)

“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society,

unless the parents hold a government license... All potential
parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals,
the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for
childbearing.”
David Brower, quoted by Dixy Lee Ray in “Trashing the Planet”

143
An article in November 2009 in the to the UK newspaper The Times stated that the
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee had called on the Government
last year to resume research on a rationing scheme and to be “courageous” in
seeking to overcome likely public hostility to the idea. It said in a report: “Opposition to
personal carbon trading could be reduced if the public could be convinced of three
things. First, that it is absolutely essential to reduce emissions; second, that this can
only be achieved if individuals take personal responsibility for reducing their own
emissions; and third, that personal carbon trading is a fairer and more effective way of
reducing personal emissions than alternatives such as higher taxes.” The committee
concluded: “Widespread public acceptance, while desirable, should not be a pre-
condition for a personal carbon trading scheme; the need to reduce emissions
is simply too urgent.” [Emphasis added]

NO CARD = NO FOOD, NO ELECTRICITY, NO FUEL, and NO TRAVEL

144
Another article in the UK newspaper The Telegraph in November 2009 with the
sub-heading “Everyone in Britain should have an annual carbon ration and be
penalised if they use too much fuel, the head of the Environment Agency will say”,
stated that “Lord Smith of Finsbury believes that implementing individual carbon
allowances for every person will be the most effective way of meeting the targets for
cutting greenhouse gas emissions.” The article quoted Ruth Lea, an economist from
Arbuthnot Banking Group, as saying: "This is all about control of the individual
and you begin to wonder whether this is what the green agenda has always
been about. It's Orwellian." [Emphasis added]

38
 An interesting article on BusinessGreen.com a UK based website stated: “The [UK]
Environment Agency will argue today that carbon rationing is the fairest and most
effective way for the UK to meet its legally binding targets to cut greenhouse gas
emissions.” The article went on to say; “The Agency’s chairman, Lord Smith, will
propose at the organisation's annual conference in London that every citizen be
provided with a "carbon account" and unique number that they submit when buying
carbon-intensive items such as petrol, electricity or airline tickets.” [Emphasis added]

Interviewer: I have to say that I had not heard anything about this at all and I am rather shocked by
your revelations about what is proposed.

QE: Well there are a few more surprises to come.

Interviewer: Please go on.

QE: For a start everything that is manufactured/consumed has a certain carbon foot-print.
In the beginning the Carbon Card may only cover the main items such as food etc but
no doubt as more and more items are added to the list eventually the Carbon Card will
be required for everything an individual needs to survive.

Interviewer: Surely some people would be able to opt out of the system. I mean if you had land
and could grow your own food and supply your own energy needs you would have no
need to accept the Carbon Card?

QE: Hmmm… Yes I know of a few people who believe that can opt out of the system but I
am afraid they are very naïve people. For a start if you lived in a remote part of a third
world country you could get away with it but in the Western World I do not think it will
be possible. Firstly it is not possible to be fully self-contained you will eventually
require something controlled by the system for your survival. Secondly the system will
mark you out as a threat and will eventually weed you out. If you have any livestock
you well be required to pay a carbon tax on these animals and of course to do this you
will require your Carbon Card. If you think that you can operate a system of barter with
others you well be in for another shock because you well be (1) required to pay taxes
on such trade and (2) such transactions would have to be made with the use of your
Carbon Card. Try and circumvent the system and the system will classify you as a
criminal with the full force of the “law” used to bring you to heel. Of course if the
Carbon Card is required to access bank accounts then you have problems paying
rates, land taxes, and what ever other taxes they throw at you. Can’t pay your taxes,
they will sell your land. No, people who believe they can escape the crutches of Big
Brother, when he arrives, are in for a rude awakening.

Mentioning livestock brings me to another part of agenda.

145
There was an interesting article that appeared in the New York Daily Times which
was written by Peter Singer, who is a professor of bioethics at Princeton University, in
the US. He states, "...taxing meat would be a highly effective way of reducing our
greenhouse gas emissions and avoiding catastrophic climate change.” He goes on
to write; "In 2006 the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization surprised
many people when it produced a report showing that livestock are responsible for
more emissions than all forms of transportation combined. It’s now clear that that
report seriously underestimated the contribution that livestock - especially ruminant
animals like cattle and sheep - are making to global warming.” Singer then goes on to
mention that “a more recent report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change has shown, over the critical next 20 years, the methane these animals
produce will be almost three times as potent in warming the planet as the FAO report
assumed. " And his solution to solve this red meat problem was to “start with a 50%
tax on the retail value of all meat, and see what difference that makes to present
consumption habits. If it is not enough to bring about the change we need, then, like
cigarette taxes, it will need to go higher."

Now it should be noted that under the Climate Change Act, Britain is obliged to cut its
146
emissions by 80 per cent on 1990 levels by 2050. This means annual CO2
147
emissions per person will have to fall from about 9 tonnes to only 2 tonnes.
148
In a News Release issued by the UK based Optimum Population Trust on the
highlights of a conference called “Environmentally Sustainable Populations: The
scientific case for population policy - and ways of achieving sustainability” the OPT

39
 stated that to “reduce London’s current ‘food footprint’...to a globally sustainable ‘fair
share’, Londoners would need to eat an estimated 70 per cent less meat.”

So while there is talk about high taxes on red meat in the UK I recently read an article
149
in the Dominion Post regarding a paper by two senior fellows from the Motu
Economic and Public Policy Research which “is New Zealand’s leading non-profit
economic and public policy research institute that carries out high quality, long-term,
socially beneficial research programmes” according to their website. Anyway in the
article this research group stated that a “carbon trading price of $25 a tonne could cut
dairy farms’ profits by 20 per cent, and sheep and beef farms’ profits could fall by 40
per cent.” Of course if profit margins fall the farmers will want more for their product
that is if the consumer can afford the prices being asked. Of course these estimates
are based on $25 per tonne; if the price, because of “market forces”, should go up to
$100 or $150 per tonne the price of red meat well become too expensive for the
average consumer and many farmers well be force of the land.

So to reduce CO2 emissions the Masses have to eat far less red meats thus reducing
the numbers of methane farting animals as methane is causing the planet to heat up.
So since cattle and sheep are so polluting they will be given a large carbon foot-print
along with high retail taxes on their meat. Of course the products such as milk
produced by methane farting animals along with products such as butter and cheese
made from this milk will also incur high taxes.

And just who are the Masses I am talking about…the people on the bottom of the
wealth pyramid of course. The low paid individuals; you know what is referred to as
the useless eaters, the surplus population no longer needed; the people who can ill-
afford to purchase extra Carbon Credits and to pay the high taxes to be placed on
essential food items such as red meat and healthy baby formula. But not to worry
there is always synthetic meat manufactured from soy based protein. Well we know
the results from eating too much soy, don’t we? But hey don’t tell the Masses. Of
course mothers won’t have to worry about not being able to feed their infants if they
are unable to breast-feed; there is always that “healthy” soy milk that is affordable.
And don’t worry about not being able to afford butter there will be plenty of that
“healthy” margarine made from polyunsaturated Soya bean oil with added chemicals
that make it taste just like butter.

Of course once the system is implemented it would be very simple to genetically

modify the Soya bean to artificially lower the already low fertility rates.

Soy for the Masses and prime cuts of beef for the Elite

What was once a minor crop, listed in the 1913 US Department of Agriculture
(USDA) handbook not as a food but as an industrial product, now covers 72
million acres of American farmland. . . Advances in technology make it
possible to produce isolated soy protein from what was once considered a
waste product - the defatted, high-protein soy chips - and then transform
something that looks and smells terrible into products that can be consumed
by human beings. Flavourings, preservatives, sweeteners, emulsifiers and
synthetic nutrients have turned soy protein isolate, the food processors' ugly
duckling, into a New Age Cinderella.
Nexus Magazine, Volume 7, Number 3 (April-May 2000)

Interviewer: Do you think that is possible and do you believe they are capable of doing that?

Abusive Population Control

www.hli.org/files/PLTP%20Abusive%20Pop%20Control.pdf

QE: Well I mentioned in my December 2008 Interview about a small Californian biotech
company called Epicyte that in 2001 announced the development of genetically
engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who
ate it sterile. Now if it can be done with corn I do not see any reason why it couldn’t be
done with the Soya bean. Now do I think they are capable of introducing something
into the food chain to lower fertility? Well they have already done that over six

40
 decades ago with the introduction of the Soya bean into the Western diet. Of course
the question arises would they go further and introduce a genetically engineered
product into the food chain specifically designed to drastically reduce fertility? I am
afraid it has been suggested a number of times before that an additive be placed
either in the water or food to cause general infertility.

In March, 1969, Vice-President of US Planned Parenthood, Frederick Jaffe's

“Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S.” is printed
containing a memo to Population Council president Bernard Berelson. It
includes examples of proposed measures to reduce U.S. fertility, such as
fertility control agents in water supply.

Margaret Sanger
Founder of Planned Parenthood
In Her Own Words
http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm

"Socialism should make it possible to regulate the reproduction of human

beings. We should be able to produce human beings under a quota system,
just as we produce bicycles and tons of steel."
Vice Premier Chan Muhua, Head of China's Family Planning Board, 1979
Quoted by Steven W. Mosher in “Broken Earth: The Rural Chinese” page 224

Interviewer: You have mentioned previously about an agenda to drastically reduce population
numbers. Do you think this will be accomplished by further lowering fertility and the
eventual introduction of licensing to restrict the numbers of those who wish to have
children or do you think that a more draconian approach maybe taken?

Abusive Population Control

www.hli.org/files/PLTP%20Abusive%20Pop%20Control.pdf

QE: I gather by draconian approach you mean the actual killing of people?

Interviewer: Yes.

QE: Firstly there is little doubt in my mind that fertility will be controlled even to the extent
of mass controlled fertility. In regards to a more draconian approach…I suppose to
most people such a proposal would be rather difficult to envisage happening in this
day and age, especially in the Western world. Now can we actually dismiss such a
possibility…I have to say that a person with a basic understanding of the people
pulling the strings of power in the world would have to be very naïve to rule out such
an action.

Interviewer: Could you explain what you mean by that?

QE: I have touched on this before but never-the-less I don’t mind going over it again
briefly.

I mentioned about “The Declaration of a Global Ethic” promoted by the Global Ethic
Foundation which is an attempt to lay the foundation for a new world religion. In 1993
at a forum entitled “Parliament of the World's Religions”, sponsored by the United
Nations, 143 leaders from all of the world's major faiths agreed to and signed this
“Global Ethic”.

Now the Global Ethic seems to contain a rather strange or, as some people have
claimed, a deeper message. It defines those who support the objectives of the
150
Declaration as “authentically human”.

Now the question is; if you support the Global Ethic you are considered “authentically
human” does this mean if you find the Global Ethic in conflict with your own beliefs,
and you reject the Global Ethic because of this, does this make you not “authentically
human” perhaps even “subhuman”?

41
Now the people promoting this New Age crap are not people who can be classified as
nobodies without significance. Many of the people who push this philosophy hold
important and influential positions in the world. An example being Horst Köhler who is
a supporter of the "Declaration Toward a Global Ethic". Köhler was Chairman of the
Executive Board and Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund who
resigned his position at the IMF in March 2004, following his nomination for the
position of President of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Then we have the “Earth Charter” and its "global ethics" which is referred to as the
"New World Ten Commandments" promoted by Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachev
and Stephen Rockefeller.

151
It is interesting to note that in 2003 the Vatican warned against the "global ethics"
which are the origin and core of the Earth Charter. Archbishop Javier Lozano
Barragán, president of the "Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers” warned that
the “global ethic” movement was an eco-religion which holds "sustainable
development" as the highest good. He said it manifests itself "as a new spirituality that
supplants all religions, because the latter have been unable to preserve the
ecosystem." In a word, this is "a new secular religion, a religion without God, or if
you prefer, a new God that is the earth itself with the name GAIA." he stated.
[Emphasis added]

Eugenics and Environmentalism: From Quality Control to

Quantity Control

Then we have the warning from the occultist Barbara Marx Hubbard who is a
“Creative Member” of the Club of Budapest International Foundation which is an
offshoot of the Club of Rome. She is also a member of the World Commission on
Global Consciousness and Spirituality. It is interesting to note that the World
Wisdom Council was initiated by The Club of Budapest International in
association with the World Commission of Global Consciousness & Spirituality.

Now just in case you think that old Hubbard is just a poor nobody ranting and raving
away I will give you a bit of background information on her. In 1970, she co-founded
the Committee for the Future and she is on the “Global Advisory Council” of the
World Future Society. She made political history in 1984 when her name was placed
in nomination for the vice presidency of the United States on the Democratic ticket.

Now Hubbard makes her position quite clear in her book Manual for Co-Creators of
the Quantum Leap. On pages 55-57 she states:

42
 "Humanity will not be able to make the transition from Earth-only to universal
life until the chaff has been separated from the wheat. The great reaper
must reap before we can take the quantum leap to the next phase of
evolution. No worldly peace can prevail until the self-centered members of
the planetary body either change or die. That is the choice. The red
horse is the destruction during the birth process of those who refuse to be
born into God-centered, universal life . . . This act is as horrible as
killing a cancer cell. It must be done for the sake of the future of the
whole." [Emphasis added]

On pages 60-61 Hubbard states:

"We, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the very last moment
before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted
and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer
grow; something must be done before the whole body is destroyed . . . the
self-centered members must be destroyed. There is no alternative. Only
the God-centered can evolve." [Emphasis added]

In The Book of Co-Creation written by Hubbard she states: "One-fourth of humanity

must be eliminated from the social body. . . We are in charge of God's selection
process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse,
Death." [Emphasis added]

Interviewer: What does she mean by “God-centred” and “self-centred”?

QE: Hubbard and company preach that there is no separation between God and you, for
you are God. If you accept this belief you are classified as “God-centred”. It should be
noted that in the occult the only real “sin” is to believe in sin and to believe you are
separate from God. However if you believe that you are not God you are classified as
“self-centred”. Of course it should be realised that Hubbard concept of God is totally
different then the concept held by Christians and Moslems.

The thoughts of a sane

individual or the ravings of a
Psychopath?
“…the self-centered members must be
destroyed. There is no alternative.
Only the God-centered can evolve. . .
One-fourth of humanity must be
eliminated from the social body.”
Barbara Marx Hubbard

So taking into account the character of some of the people involved and the fact that
there is evidence suggesting that these people desire to reduce world population
numbers down to somewhere between five hundred million to two billion one ready
can not rule out the possibility of extreme measures being taken to accomplish this.

Interviewer: But surely in this day and age there is no way that people such as Hubbard could get
their way?

QE: Take into consideration the Holocaust committed in Israel in the 1950's that involved
the deliberate mass radiation poisoning of nearly all Sephardi Jewish youths, an entire
generation.
In a mass atomic experiment done under the disguise for the treatment of ringworm it
was intended that every Sephardi child in Israel was to receive “35,000 times the
maximum dose of x-rays through his head. For doing so, the American government
paid the Israeli government 300 million Israeli liras a year. The entire Health budget
was 60 million liras. The money paid by the Americans is equivalent to billions of
152
dollars today.”

This act of genocide, financed by the USA, was ordered by the light skinned
Ashkenazi Jewish leaders against the darker skinned Sephardi youths because they

43
 were considered inferior. In a documentary shown in Israeli in 2005 a historian who
outlined a history of the eugenics movement declared that the ringworm operation
was a eugenics program aimed at weeding out the perceived weak strains of society.

It is amazing that even among those Jews who believe that they are “the Chosen
People” there are some that consider themselves superior to some of their more dark-
skinned religious brethren.

Then we have Pol Pot who was backed by the USA by proxy through the Chinese.
During his time in power Pol Pot imposed a version of agrarian collectivization
whereby city dwellers were relocated to the countryside to work in collective farms
and forced labour projects - you could say he was a Greenie well ahead of his time.
Under his rule and direction the Khmer Rouge slaughtered an estimated 3 million
people - anyone who did not fit into Pol Pot's New Order was systematically
eliminated.

Now it appears to me that Hubbard and company are not any better then the people
involved in the act of genocide against the Sephardi youths nor are they any better
then Pol Pot's lot. Now if anyone believes that past acts of insane violence could not
possible happen again then I strongly suggest that they study the Milgram experiment
conducted by psychologist Stanley Milgram.

Interviewer: You have talked about a Carbon Card and the possibility that it may have an
international data base. Now I don’t wish to put you in an awkward position but since
we have touched on the subject of religion do you think that this Carbon Card, if it
does eventuate, would fit the description in various religious teachings that refer to the
Mark of the Beast?

QE: There have been many claims on what this so-called Mark of the Beast will be, but
taking the turn of events I would have to say the Carbon Card would be a logical
contender.

It is interesting that you brought up this subject. Now what I find most intriguing is the
fact that while there is talk of reducing carbon dioxide output on one hand on the other
hand everything is given a carbon foot-print; not a carbon dioxide foot-print but a
carbon foot-print. Also in regards to the Carbon Card I discussed; once again it is
referred to as a Carbon Card not a Carbon Dioxide Card. Why on one hand talk about
carbon dioxide and on the other hand talk of carbon; is this a sleight of hand?

At this point it is most interesting to note that the atomic number of carbon is 6. Now
there are 15 known isotopes of carbon of which only three are found in nature, the
rest of the other carbon isotopes are produced in the laboratory i.e. man made.

Of these three naturally occurring carbon isotopes, carbon-12, carbon-13, and carbon-
14, only two, carbon-12 and carbon-13, are classified as stable. Carbon-12 which has
6 neutrons forms 98.93% of the carbon on Earth. Carbon-13 which has 7 neutrons is
formed after a carbon-12 nucleus fuses with a proton to form nitrogen-13 which
eventually decays to form carbon -13, makes up most of the remaining 1.07% of
carbon isotopes.

Carbon-14, which has 8 neutrons makes-up less than one-billionth of carbon on Earth,
is created in the upper atmosphere by interaction of nitrogen-14 with cosmic rays
which then spreads evenly throughout the atmosphere. Now Carbon-14 is an unstable
isotope which eventually decays back to nitrogen-14.

Are you with me so far?

Interviewer: I think so…please carry on.

QE: Now humans are classified as a Carbon-12 life form; taking this fact into consideration
it becomes most intriguing to discover that Carbon-12 has 6 protons, 6 neutrons, and
6 electrons.

Interviewer: 6 protons, 6 neutrons, and 6 electrons? Now I hope I don’t appear to be paranoid if
the number 666 pops into my head?

44
QE: For a start I’m not what would be considered a religious man. Although I believe in the
existence of a higher power I do not belong to any church and the only times I have
been in a church is to either attend a marriage or a funeral. That aside I have to admit
that the Carbon Card certainly made me think about Revelation 13:18; "Here is
wisdom. Let him who has a mind calculate the number of the wild beast, for it is the
number of mankind, and its number is six hundred sixty-six."

I had to think to myself… cripes… now is all this just a coincidence?

Interviewer: Do you think this is just a coincidence?

QE: I truly hope it is. But on the other hand when one back-tracks through all the front
organisations pushing the misinformation on claims that man is responsible for the
climate warming and all the propaganda and hysteria connected with it, then one
discovers people at its root who can only be described as evil and completely devoid
of any empathy towards mankind. So, based on my knowledge, I certainly can not
dismiss it outright so I will just keep an open mind on this for the time being.

Interviewer: I thought Revelation 13:18 stated “the number of a man” but you state “the number of
mankind”?

QE: Most translations read this verse of Scripture as "the number of a man" but it is my
understanding that this is incorrect and that the correct translation is "the number of
mankind" meaning all men and women - humanity.

Interviewer: The verse you quote, from what bible does it come?

QE: The Concordant Literal New Testament.

Interviewer: I have never heard of that version

QE: The Concordant Literal New Testament was the work of a man named A. E. Knoch.
He was born in St. Louis, Missouri in the US in 1874 and died, I believe, in 1965. Now
Knoch, who had an excellent grasp of Greek, believed there were many errors in the
Bible translations of his day and he dedicated much of his life in producing a
translation of the scriptures that he felt to be accurate and free from personal bias.

Interviewer: Are you claiming that they majority of Christians who believe that the verse is “the
number of a man” are wrong?

QE: There are dozens of different English translations of the Bible and each one chooses
different translations of various words to express what the translation's authors felt
were accurate. Now it is estimated that there are approximately 38,000 Christian
153
denominations in the world which includes approximately 1,000 Christian faith
groups in the U.S. and Canada who each believe themselves to be the only true
Christian denomination. Now can you tell me please, leaving out all the various non-
English adaptations, which of these dozens of different New Testament translations
written in English is a complete and accurate version of the original Greek transcripts?

45
 Now it is just not possible for all the dozens of different English translations of the
Bible to be all completely correct as the various authors of the different translations
used various words to express what they felt were accurate. Now is there any English
translation of the New Testament that is a completely true and accurate translation
from the original Greek? To make it a bit more simple has anyone who accepts the
commonly accepted version of Revelation 13:18 taken the time and effort to check its
accuracy or have they just accepted someone’s word that it is accurate?

On the other hand just because the majority believe something true does that make it
true? In our past it was once Church doctrine that the sun revolved around the earth
and if you publicly disputed this belief you ran the risk of being tied to a stake and
burnt alive as a heretic.

Now it is not my intention to get into a debate with you over Scripture. Whether I am
right or wrong, in accepting the Concordant Literal New Testament interpretation of
Revelation 13:18, this shouldn't cloud or impact upon the facts raised on other matters
during our conversation.

Interviewer: No doubt some people well think you are a bit of a crack-pot conceding the possible of
a connection between the Carbon Card and the Mark of the Beast?

QE: I have a very open and enquiring mind and I certainly do not discount something
outright if the evidence suggests otherwise. If people wish to believe that I am a crack-
pot then so be it; it certainly is no skin off my nose.

But before I carry on I have to say that if there is no God then humanity is in very
serious trouble because what I believe that faces humanity further down the track will
need some sort of God-like intervention if the bulk of humanity is to survive.

Interviewer: What are you exactly getting at? What serious trouble?

QE: As I mentioned earlier the male fertility rates are falling at an alarming rate and if this
continues, and there is no reason to doubt that they will continue to fall, then within
thirty years or maybe less most males will be sterile. Now where will this lead us to,
especially if those “people” pushing for Global Governance get their way? After all
these “people” have a general contempt for the Masses.

Interviewer: But why the contempt?

QE: These “people” consider themselves superior and look upon the Masses as a cancer
upon the planet using valuable resources and destroying “their” environment.
Secondly too many people are a potential threat to them because we far outnumber
“them”; far easier to control five hundred million or maybe two billion people then
seven, or eight, or nine billion. Thirdly because of advances in technology and
automation the bulk of the Masses are considered redundant by these “people”, you
know obsolete, not needed.

Interviewer: I get your point.

QE: Good…now where was I…Now as I was saying the fertility rates are falling and what
is being done about it? NOTHING AT ALL. Of course from time to time researchers
raise the alarm but as I said nothing is done.

46
 Of course when a couple wish to start a family and they discover they have a fertility
problem they turn to IVF, or donated sperm, or donated eggs and now donated
embryos. Of course there is always surrogacy, you know a couple pay another
woman to carry their child for them or if you are really trendy and PC you can adopt a
child from one of the third world countries.

People are not questioning why they are infertile and looking for the answers, they just
appear to accept it as part of live. People are slowly being conditioned to accept the
fact that infertility is a part of life.

Now if human breeding is to be regulated in the future, under the guise of cutting CO2
output, and there is evidence to suggest this is the intention, it is more then probably
this will be overseen by a Global Authority as well. Of course the willy-nilly approach
to treating infertility by independent clinics will in all probability become a thing of the
past as a more central approach is taken.

Interviewer: I have an uneasy feeling what you are coming to, especially taking into consideration
the connection you made before regarding eugenics and population control.

QE: You appear to becoming attuned to my thinking. But it is not the issue of eugenics I
was going to rise but the issue of generically modifying humans.

The New Eugenics is not about the survival of the fittest but the
survival of the richest.

Interviewer: Aren’t you crossing into the realms of fantasy?

QE: Am I? I think that if people dismiss such a possibility then they are the ones living in a
fantasy and should wake-up because such experiments are in progress.

As an example a mouse without a father has been created for the first time in an
experiment that shatters the standard scientific belief that mammals of the same sex
cannot produce viable offspring. The mouse was conceived from the unfertilised eggs
of two mothers, making her the first mammal to be born without a male genetic
154
contribution. The point I make here is that if it can be done with a mouse it can be
done with humans. Then we had the news item carried by the BBC in February 2008
claiming that researchers at Newcastle University in the UK have created a human
embryo with three separate parents; the embryos were created using DNA from a
155
man and two women in lab tests. Of course other researchers have gone well
beyond this point.

Interviewer: What do you mean?

156
QE: For years scientists have added human genes to bacteria and farm animals.
Scientists have already begun blurring the line between human and animal by
producing chimeras - a hybrid creature that's part human, part animal. In Minnesota,
pigs are being born with human blood in their veins; and it's not just pig blood cells
being swept along with human blood cells as some of the cells themselves have
merged, creating hybrids. In Nevada, there are sheep whose livers and hearts are
largely human. In California, mice peer from their cages with human brain cells firing
157
inside their skulls. From what I understand researchers intend to create mice whose
158
brains are 100 per cent human.

Chinese scientists at the Shanghai Second Medical University in 2003 successfully

fused human cells with rabbit eggs. The embryos were reportedly the first human-
animal chimeras successfully created. They were allowed to develop for several days
in a laboratory dish before the scientists destroyed the embryos to harvest their stem
159
cells.

Some researchers like Robert Streiffer, a professor of philosophy and bioethics at the
University of Wisconsin in the US, fantasise over a human-chimpanzee chimera
endowed with speech and an enhanced potential to learn - what some have called a
160
"humanzee." Of course there are claims from researchers that if such chimeras
were created they would be given protection. But then we have likes of Harvard
political philosopher Michael J. Sandel stating that the chances are that these hybrid
161
humans would be made to “perform menial jobs or dangerous jobs.”

47
 But creating human-animal chimeras…has raised troubling questions:
What new subhuman combination should be produced and for what
purpose? At what point would it be considered human? And what
rights, if any, should it have?
National Geographic News. January 25, 2005
"Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy"
http://tinyurl.com/3kjah

In February 2007 it was announced in the UK that women "will be able to sell their
162
eggs for scientific research after British regulators give the all-clear." A few months
163
later in September 2007 it was revelled in COSMOS magazine that "Britain's fertility
regulator had decided in principle to allow scientists to create human-animal hybrid
embryos for research purposes." COSMOS went on to state that researchers intend
"transferring nuclei containing DNA from human cells to animal eggs that have had
nearly all their genetic information removed. The resulting embryos are therefore
mostly human, with a small animal component."

Then we have David P. Barash, a professor of psychology at the University of

Washington saying that reproductive facilities should work towards creating a race of
human/chimpanzee hybrids, but, he admits, only because it would offend Christians.
He reveals, however, that his motivation is not a pure interest in advancing science,
but his hatred for “know-nothing anti-evolutionism,” and “religious fundamentalists,”
who hold human life to be sacred. Now note "hatred for those who hold human life
to be sacred." According to an article on the LifeSiteNews website Barash says that
creating animal/human hybrids would effectively quash the belief that “the human
species, unlike all others, possesses a spark of the divine and that we therefore stand
outside nature.” The article quotes Barash as stating: “Should geneticists and
developmental biologists succeed once again in joining human and nonhuman
animals in a viable organism,” then “it would be difficult and perhaps impossible
for the special pleaders to maintain the fallacy that Homo sapiens is uniquely
164
disconnected from the rest of life.” [Emphasis added]

Now thinking of the advancements in technology and the increasing scientific

breakthroughs being made one cannot avoid remembering the words of Aldous
Huxley:

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of

making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears,
so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire
societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them,
but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to
rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by
165
pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."

But today science has made advances further beyond what existed in Huxley’s time.
Why use drugs when genes can be manipulated to produce “compliant” creatures as
166
an article in the UK based Sunday Times has shown to be feasible. It is interesting
to note that the beginning of the article made a reference to Huxley stating: “ALDOUS
HUXLEY may have got it right. In Brave New World, his classic futuristic novel, the
author envisaged a society divided into castes from Alpha at the top to Epsilon at the
bottom.”

According to the article scientists in the USA have discovered that by blocking the
effects of a gene in the brain called D2 in monkeys, the monkeys’ behaviour can be
permanently altered, turning the subjects from aggressive to “compliant” creatures. It
was noted in the article that humans have an identical gene and that “scientists
acknowledge that methods of manipulating human physical and psychological traits
are just around the corner.”

If people hold the view that mankind is just another animal then the bulk of humanity
shouldn’t complain if they end-up being treated like an animal. On the other hand if
people believe that mankind is special and thus have a special status above that of
other life forms on this planet then they had better heed the warning I have given and
take action to protect their status especially taking into consideration that there are

48
 people in the world who believe that they are apart from, and superior to, the rest of
humanity and view people outside of their group as no better than cattle.

Now looking at the evidence presented here and taking into consideration what I have
stated the average person would have to be rather dim-witted if they didn’t feel a bit of
anxiety in regards to what the future holds for them, their family, and humanity in
general.

© Copyright Qadosh Erectus. Permission granted to freely distribute this article for non-
commercial purposes if unedited and copied in full, including this notice. Reproduction of this
article for the purposes of commercial redistribution is prohibited except with written permission
from Qadosh Erectus. No copyright is claimed on the images used in this publication or on the
material quoted.

Contact details: QadoshErectus@gmail.com or PO Box 31-175, Lower Hutt 5011, New Zealand.
1
PrisonPlanet. December 16, 2009. "UN Chief: We Will Impose Global Governance"
http://www.prisonplanet.com/un-chief-we-will-impose-global-governance.html
2
THE AGE [Australia] March 19, 2009. "China's new carbon card"
http://www.theage.com.au/world/chinas-new-carbon-card-20090318-924v.html
3
LifeSiteNews. December 18, 2009. "Vatican Newspaper Slams the Copenhagen Summit over
Population Control, 'Nihilism'"
http://www.vatican.va/news_services/or/or_quo/commenti/2009/291q01b1.html
4
Oslington P. "Economics and religion, Volume 2" pp 79
5
The Limits to Growth is a 1972 book modelling the consequences of a rapidly growing world population
and finite resource supplies, commissioned by the Club of Rome. Its authors were Donella H.
Meadows, Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. The book echoes some of
the concerns and predictions of the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus in An Essay on the Principle of
Population (1798).
6
Beyond the Limits was a 1992 book continuing the modelling of the consequences of a rapidly growing
global population that was started in Limits to Growth. Donella Meadows, Dennis Meadows, and Jorgen
Randers are the authors and all were involved in the original Club of Rome study as well.
7
The Economist "Falling fertily" http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14744915
8
"Is This Your Childs World" by Dorris J. Rapp MD, published by Bantam, page 501
9
Dhushara website http://www.dhushara.com/book/diversit/extra/sperm.htm
10
New Scientist: 11th January, 1997. "Fresh Alarm overThreatened Sperm"
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg15320640.500-fresh-alarm-over-threatened-sperm.html
11
Impact Lab. January 5, 2004. "Sperm Count Dropping Rapidly
http://www.impactlab.com/2004/01/05/sperm-count-dropping-rapidly/
12
The Internet Journal of Urology 2004: Volume 2 Number 1. "The sperm count has been decreasing
steadily for many years in Western industrialised countries: Is there an endocrine basis for this
decrease?" http://tinyurl.com/yf9rceu
13
PHG Foundation. 6 January 2004. "Concern over falling sperm counts in UK men"
http://www.phgfoundation.org/news/1302/
14
MeD INDIA. 13 October, 2005 "The Falling Sperm Count In Men"
http://www.medindia.net/news/The-Falling-Sperm-Count-In-Men-5276-1.htm
15
Slate. May 3, 2006. "What's Really Behind the Plunge in Teen Pregnancy?"
http://www.slate.com/id/2140985/
16
The Dominion Post [NZ]. 21 October, 2008. "Kiwi men’s sperm count drops"
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/archive/national-news/682484
17
JAMA 1998 Apr 1;279(13):1018-23
18
Natural News, June 2, 2009. "A Fluoride-Free Pineal Gland is More Important than Ever"
http://www.naturalnews.com/026364_fluoride_pineal_gland_sodium.html
19
http://www.fluoridation.com/epa2.htm
20
Mullenix PJ, et al. 1995. "Neurotoxicity of sodium fluoride in rats."
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1995 Mar-Apr;17(2):169-77.
21
Guan Z.Z., et al. 1998. "Influence of chronic fluorosis on membrane lipids in rat brain."
Neurotoxicology and Teratology 20 537-542
22
Li XS, Zhi JL, Gao RO. "Effect of Fluoride Exposure on Intelligence in Children."
Fluoride [JOURNAL of the International Society for Fluoride Research] Volume 28 Number 4 November
1995. pp 187-260
23
Zhao, L.B., et al. “Effect of high fluoride water supply on children's intelligence.”
FLUORIDE [QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR FLUORIDE
RESEARCH] Vol.29 No.4 November 1996. pp 187-260
24
Luke, J.A. “Effect of fluoride on the physiology of the pineal gland.” Caries Research 28 204 (1994).
25
Schlesinger, E.R. et al. “Newburgh-Kingston caries-fluorine study XIII. Pediatric findings after ten
years.” JADA 52 296-306 (1956).

49
26
Radiant Health. “Fluoride Causes Hypothyroidism”
http://owen.curezone.com/healing/flouridehypothyroidism.html
27
The New Zealand Listener, April 1-7 2006 Vol 203 No 3438. "Growth spurt"
http://tinyurl.com/yd6gu5l
28
KESQ.COM "'Precocious Puberty': Children Growing Up Too Fast"
http://www.kesq.com/Global/story.asp?s=10241096
29
Hart R, et al. 2009. “Relationship between municipal water fluoridation and preterm birth in Upstate
New York.” Paper 197468 presented at American Public Health Association, Annual Meeting,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. November 9, 2009.
http://apha.confex.com/apha/137am/webprogram/Paper197468.html
30
Pushpalatha T, et al. 2005. "Exposure to high fluoride concentration in drinking water will affect
spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in male albino rats." Biometals 18:207-12.
31
REUTERS, April 27, 2009. "First European evidence for earlier female puberty"
http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE53Q6FD20090427
32
Larsen MJ, et al. "Fluctuation of fluoride concentrations in drinking waters: a collaborative study."
Int Dent J. 1989 Jun;39(2):140-6.
33
Nina J. Wang. PUblic Dental Services, Oslo, Norway. "Government policies on fluoride utilization in
the Nordic countries" Acta Odontologica 1999, Vol. 57, No. 6, Pages 342-347
34
"Aggregate Exposures to Phthalates in Humans" www.ecocenter.org/dust/Phthalate_hcwh.pdf
35
Environmental Working Group. "Beauty Secrets: Health Effects of Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP)"
http://www.ewg.org/node/8173
36
ABC News Men's Health Coverage, November 11, 2009 "Plastic Bottle Chemical Tied to Male
Infertility"
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MensHealthNews/bpa-linked-sexual-dysfunction-men/story?id=9048200
37
Ferrel J. "Are Plastic Food and Beverage Containers Safe?"
http://ezinearticles.com/?Are-Plastic-Food-and-Beverage-Containers-Safe?&id=57347
38
Hougaard KS, et al. 2009. "Increased incidence of infertility treatment among women working in the
plastics industry" PMID: 19429396
39
BBC News, November 16, 2009. "Plastic chemicals 'feminise boys' "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8361863.stm
40
Telegraph [UK] 23 October, 2009. "Why boys are turning into girls "
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthcomment/geoffrey-lean/6418553/Why-boys-are-turning-into-
girls.html
41
USA Today. "Plastic chemical linked aggression in toddler girls"
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-10-06-bpa-pregnancy_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip
42
Canada.com. October 5, 2009. "Girls with prenatal exposure to bisphenol A more aggressive,
hyperactive: Study"
http://www.canada.com/health/Girls+with+prenatal+exposure+bisphenol+more+aggressive+hyperactive
+Study/2069012/story.html
43
ScienceDaily. April 13, 2005. "Chemical Present In Clear Plastics Can Impair Learning And Cause
Disease" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/04/050413090800.htm
44
ScienceDaily. June 12, 2009. "Bisphenol A Exposure In Pregnant Mice Permanently Changes DNA
Of Offspring" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090610124428.htm
45
ScienceDaily. February 15, 2007. "Plastics In Common Household Items May Cause Fertility Defects"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070215145120.htm
46
ScienceDaily. July 9, 2009. "Plastics Chemical, Bisphenol A, Retards Growth, Function Of Adult
Reproductive Cells" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090708101306.htm
47
ScienceDaily. February 4, 2008. "Plastic Bottles Release Potentially Harmful Chemicals (Bisphenol A)
After Contact With Hot Liquids" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130092108.htm
48
ScienceDaily. May 22, 2009. "BPA, Chemical Used To Make Plastics, Found To Leach From
Polycarbonate Drinking Bottles Into Humans"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090521141208.htm
49
NATIONAL WILDLIFE. Feb/Mar 2004, vol. 42 no. 2. "Protecting Yourself From Unsafe Plastics"
http://www.nwf.org/nationalwildlife/article.cfm?articleId=890&issueId=66
50
ScienceDaily. April 2, 2008. "Why Synthetic Estrogens Wreak Havoc On Reproductive System"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080331093530.htm
51
MedPage, February 5, 2009. "Bisphenol A Mimics Estrogen, Phthalates Target Testosterone"
http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/PublicHealth/12767
52
Hunt PA, et al. 2003. "Bisphenol A exposure causes meiotic aneuploidy in the female mouse."
Current Biology 13: 546-553 (2003).
53
Lang IA, et al. September 2008. "Association of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration With Medical
Disorders and Laboratory Abnormalities in Adults" JAMA. 2008;300(11):1303-1310
54
New York Times [USA]. November 7, 2009. "Chemicals in Our Food, and Bodies"
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/opinion/08kristof.html?_r=1
55
The Washington Post. May 31, 2009. "Strategy Being Devised To Protect Use of BPA"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/30/AR2009053002121.html

50
56
Phthalates Information Centre Europe. "Types of Phthalates"
http://www.phthalates.com/index.asp?page=7
57
DEHP Information Centre. November 16, 2009. "Study claiming to show prenatal exposure to DEHP
and DBP has feminising effect on young boys should be treated with extreme caution says ECPI"
http://www.dehp-facts.com/module/news/display/newsdisplay.aspx?news=33
58
New American, October 7, 2009. "Are Hormone-mimicking Chemicals Harming Our Children?"
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/2038-are-hormone-
mimicking-chemicals-harming-our-children
59
MedPage, February 5, 2009. "Bisphenol A Mimics Estrogen, Phthalates Target Testosterone"
http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/PublicHealth/12767
60
Environmental Working Group [USA] "Bisphenol A: Toxic Plastics Chemical in Canned Food: BPA
and human diseases on the rise"
http://www.ewg.org/node/20937
61
Environmental Working Group [USA. March 2007 “A Survey of Bisphenol A in U.S. Canned Foods"
http://www.ewg.org/reports/bisphenola
62
Aphrodite Women's Health. Juy 3, 2003. "Polycystic Ovaries Twice As Common In Lesbians"
http://www.suite101.com/external_link.cfm?elink=%20http://www.aphroditewomenshealth.com/news/20
030603024754_health_news.shtml
63
Ibid
64
The Hormone Foundation. "Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)"
http://www.hormone.org/polycystic_ovary_syndrome.cfm
65
Healthy [UK]. November 28, 2009. "Could you have PCOS?"
http://www.healthy-magazine.co.uk/experts/could-you-have-pcos
66
Savic I, et al. April 2005. "Brain response to putative pheromones in homosexual men"
http://www.pnas.org/content/102/20/7356.full.pdf+html?sid=b153bb89-03b9-420f-9f04-d850e73e7d20
67
Berglund H, et al. March 2006. "Brain response to putative pheromones in lesbian women"
http://www.pnas.org/content/103/21/8269.full.pdf+html?sid=b153bb89-03b9-420f-9f04-d850e73e7d20
68
NewScientist. May 8, 2006. "Clue to sexual attraction found in lesbian brain"
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9125-clue-to-sexual-attraction-found-in-lesbian-brain.html
69
The Advocate (US homosexual & lesbian newsmagazine). February 17, 1998. "Gay for the thrill of it."
Cited at The Free Library.
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Gay+for+the+thrill+of+it.(genetics+and+homosexuality+researcher+Dean.
..-a020368658
70
Savic I, et al. April 2005. "Brain response to putative pheromones in homosexual men"
http://www.pnas.org/content/102/20/7356.full.pdf+html?sid=b153bb89-03b9-420f-9f04-d850e73e7d20
71
The Advocate. July 5, 2005 [US homosexual & lesbian newsmagazine] "Scents and sexuality: this
spring's breakthrough study on how gays and straights respond differently to human smells is only the
latest in a long line of studies suggesting a genetic link to sexual orientation."
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Scents+and+sexuality%3a+this+spring%27s+breakthrough+study+on+ho
w+gays...-a0134170517
72
SCIENCE NEWS. August 31, 1991. "Brain feature linked to sexual orientation”
View @ The Free Library:
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Brain+feature+linked+to+sexual+orientation.-a011315232
73
AllPsych Journal. Johnson R.D. April 2003."Homosexuality: Nature or Nurture"
http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html
74
Monje L., et al. 2009. "Neonatal exposure to bisphenol A alters estrogen-dependent mechanisms
governing sexual behavior in the adult female rat "
Reproductive Toxicology. Volume 28, Issue 4, December 2009, Pages 435-442
75
Funabashi T, et al. 2003. "Bisphenol A increases progesterone receptor immunoreactivity in the
hypothalamus in a dose-dependent manner and affects sexual behaviour in adult ovariectomized rats."
J. Neuroendocrinol. 15:134-140 (2003).
76
AllPsych Journal. Johnson R.D. April 2003."Homosexuality: Nature or Nurture"
http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html
77
Pillard, Richard. “NPR Letters on the Biological Basis of Homosexuality.” Online. 8 April 2003.
Available http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/RootWeb/npr_letters_on_the_biological_ba.htm
78
Ibid.
79
Taylor AE. 2000. "The gonadotropic axis in hyperandrogenic adolescents." PMID: 11117670
80
Mediate.com. June 1997. "Psychological and Emotional Aspects of Divorce" by Kathleen O'Connell
Corcoran. http://www.mediate.com/articles/Psych.cfm
81
WorldNetDaily, December 12, 2006. "Soy is making kids 'gay' by Jim Rutz.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53327
82
Franke, AA, Custer LG et al. "Quantification of phytoestrogens in legumes by HPLC." J Agric Food
Chem, 1994, 42, 1905-13.
83
Markiewicz J, Garey J et al. "In vitro bioassays of non-steroidal phytoestrogens." J Steroids Biochem
Mol Biol, 1993, 45, 5, 399-405.

51
84
Irvine CHG, Fitzpatrick MG, Alexander SL. "Phytoestrogens in soy-based infant foods: concentrations,
daily intake and possible biological effects." Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 1998, 217, 247-253.
85
Setchell KDR, Zimmer-Nechemias L et al. "Exposure of infants to phyto-oestrogens from soy-based
infant formula." Lancet, 1997, 350, 9070.
86
Office of the Swiss Federal Health Service Bulletin #28, July 20, 1992.
87
Setchell KDR, Zimmer-Nechemias L et al. "Isoflavone content of infant formulas and the metabolic
fate of these phytoestrogens in early life." Am J Clin Nutr, 1998, 69 (suppl) 1453S-61S.
88
Giddens, Herman et al. “Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in office
practice.” Study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings Network, 1997, 99, 4, 505-512.
89
WorldNetDaily. December 26, 2006. "The trouble with soy, part 3" by Jim Rutz.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53507
90
Ibid.
91
Baskin, Laurence, ed. “Hypospadias and Genital Development, Advances in Experimental Biology
and Medicine”, vol 545. (N.Y. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2004. The definitive textbook.
92
Hines M. “Hormonal and neural correlates of sex-typed behavioral development in human beings.” In
Marc Haug, ed. “The Development of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior” (Dordrecht, Kluwer
Academic, 1993). 131-147.
93
Harrison PJ, Everall IP et al. "Is homosexuality hardwired? Sexual orientation and brain structure."
Psych Med, 1994, 24, 811-16.
94
Lund TD, West TW et al. “Visual spatial memory is enhanced in female rats.” BMC Neurosci, 2001, 1,
1-13.
95
Baskin, Laurence, ed. "Hypospadias and Genital Development, Advances in Experimental Biology
and Medicine," vol. 545. (N.Y. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2004). The definitive textbook. On
soy and homosexuality, see also: Lephart ED, Setchell KD, Lund TD. “Phytoestrogens: hormonal action
and brain plasticity”. Brain Res Bull, 2005 Apr 15; 65 (3): 193-8. Also see Lephart ED, Rhees RW et al.
“Estrogens and phytoestrogens: brain plasticity of sexually dimorphic brain volumes.” J Steroid Biochem
Mol Biol, 2003 June; 85 (2-5): 299-309.
96
Ibid
97
Zhong, et al. "Effects of dietary supplement of soy protein isolate and low fat diet on prostate cancer."
FASEB J 2000;14(4):a531.11
98
Nagata C, et al. "Inverse association of soy product intake with serum androgen and estrogen
concentrations in Japanese men." Nutr Cancer 2000;36(1):14-8.
99
"The Zardoz Effect: The Epidemic of Male Infertility." By William Wong ND, PhD.
http://www.mikemahler.com/articles/wong6.html
100
Men'sHealth.com. "Is This the Most Dangerous Food for Men?"
http://www.menshealth.com/bestfoods/food_features/Is_This_the_Most_Dangerous_Food_for_Men3.ph
p
101
Irvine CH and others. Phytoestrogens in soy-based infant foods: concentrations, daily intake, and
possible biological effects. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1998 Mar 217:3 247-53.
102
The Weston A. Price Foundation. "The Effects of Antenatal Exposure to Phytoestrogens on Human
Male Reproductive and Urogenital Development" by Bernard Poggi.
http://www.westonaprice.org/soy/phytoestrogens.html
103
Men'sHealth.com. Op. cit.
104
"Bad Protein" by TC
http://www.tmuscle.com/free_online_article/sports_body_training_performance_consumer/bad_protein_
a_testosterone_consumer_report
105
The Guardian [UK]. July 24, 2008. "Health: Soya-based foods may harm male fertility, say scientists"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/jul/24/foodtech.medicalresearch
106
WorldNetDaily. "Soy is making kids 'gay'" by Jim Rutz
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53327
107
PreventDisease. "Fermented Soy Is The Only Soy Food Fit for Human Consumption"
http://preventdisease.com/news/09/020409_soy.shtml
108
SoyInfo Center. “Dr. Artemy Alexis Horvath: Work with Soyfoods”
http://www.soyinfocenter.com/HSS/artemy_horvath.php
109
Ibid
110
Ibid
111
Fukutake M., et al. “Quantification of Genistein in Soybeans and Soybean Products.”
Food and Chemical Toxicology, 1996;34:457-461.
112
Dr. Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD, CCN. "The Whole Soy Story: The dark side of America's favorite health
food."
113
Blaylock, Russell MD, Email Correspondence with Cori Brackett, 2005.
Cited in "Aspartame and Pregnancy" Healthy Holistic Living
http://www.healthy-holistic-living.com/aspartame-and-pregnancy.html
114
The Dominion Post [NZ] November 20, 2009. “Birth control may beat climate change” pp B1
115
Financial Post [USA]. December 8, 2009. "The real inconvenient truth" by Diane Francis
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2314438

52
116
Harvard Science. "John P. Holdren named President-elect Obama’s Science Advisor"
http://tinyurl.com/cqh8ay
117
Ibid
118
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. "Human Rights & International Justice"
http://tinyurl.com/ydl5l2r
119
Wikipedia. "Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belfer_Center_for_Science_and_International_Affairs
120
informationliberation. December 10, 2009. "Monckton: Secretive Copenhagen Treaty Creates
Larcenous Global Government Tax" http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=28252
121
Social Market Foundation. "Trading Emissions - Full global potential" by Simon Linnett, Executive
Vice Chairman of Rothschild. http://www.smf.co.uk/trading-emissions.html
122
The Telegraph [UK]. January 31, 2008. "Carbon trading must be globally regulated"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthcomment/3323732/Carbon-trading-must-be-globally-
regulated.html
123
Corbett Report. December 11, 2009. "Carbon Eugenics" http://tinyurl.com/y8fbvgo
124
Eugenics Watch. "Introduction to Eugenics" http://www.eugenics-watch.com/intro.html#ref2
125
Osborn, Frederick, Galton Lecture, Eugenics Review, 1956-1957, p. 21 -22
126
Corbett Report. December 11, 2009. "Carbon Eugenics" http://tinyurl.com/y8fbvgo
127
Tracey C. Rembert, "Ted Turner: Billionaire, Media Mogul ... And Environmentalist" (Interview), E
Magazine, January/February 1999, Volume X, number 1, p. 10
128
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. April 3, 2008. "Ted Turner: Global warming could lead to
cannibalism" http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/news/stories/2008/04/03/turner_0404.html
129
Quoted in the book Final Days by Woodward and Bernstein.
130
LifeSiteNews. July 5, 2007. "Bill Gates Among Investors with $26 Million Share in Homosexual
Activist Publishing Company"
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/jul/07070509.html
131
news.com.au. December 10, 2007. "Tax babies 'to save planet'"
http://www.news.com.au/tax-babies-to-save-planet/story-e6frfkp9-1111115078151
132
TimesOnLine. March 22, 2009. "UK population must fall to 30m, says Porritt"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5950442.ece?Submitted=true
133
Swans Commentary. August 10, 2009. "The Philanthropic Roots Of Corporate Environmentalism" by
Michael Barker.
http://www.swans.com/library/art14/barker07.html#027
134
Times Online. February 8, 2009. "The fight to get aboard Lifeboat UK"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5682887.ece
135
The Optimum Population Trust. "Population Growth and Climate Change"
www.optimumpopulation.org/submissions/climatechange09.pdf
136
The Optimum Population Trust NEWS RELEASE September 9 2009 "CONTRACEPTION IS
‘GREENEST’ TECHNOLOGY"
http://www.optimumpopulation.org/releases/opt.release09Sep09.htm
137
The Guardian. December 3, 2009. "Rich nations to offset emissions with birth control"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/03/carbon-offset-projects-climate-change
138
Ibid
139
NewsWithViews. November 14, 2006. "DEPOPULATION AND THE AMERICAN MUTTS - PART 1"
http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy66.htm
140
NZ Listener. November 24-30 2007 Vol. 211 No 3524. “On the cards”
http://www.listener.co.nz/issue/3524/columnists/10038/on_the_cards.html;jsessionid=AAD0FB785A1C8
246E4090AC4383D7514
141
Wikipedia. "David Miliband" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Miliband#cite_note-43
142
BBC NEWS. December 11, 2006. "Carbon 'credit card' considered"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/uk_news/politics/6167671.stm
143
The Times [UK]. November 9, 2009. "Carbon ration account for all proposed by Environment
Agency"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6909046.ece
144
The Telegraph [UK]. November 9, 2009. "Everyone in Britain could be given a personal 'carbon
allowance'"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/carbon/6527970/Everyone-in-Britain-could-be-given-a-
personal-carbon-allowance.html
145
NY Daily News. October 25, 2009. "Make meat-eaters pay: Ethicist proposes radical tax, says they're
killing themselves and the planet"
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/10/25/2009-10-
25_make_meateaters_pay_ethicist_proposes_radical_tax_says_theyre_killing_themselves.html
146
Optimum Population Trust NEWS RELEASE. March 26 2009.”SEX IS MAIN CAUSE OF
POPULATION GROWTH”
http://www.optimumpopulation.org/releases/opt.release26Mar09.htm
147
The Telegraph [UK] November 9, 2009. Op. cit.

53
148
Optimum Population Trust NEWS RELEASE. March 26 2009.”SEX IS MAIN CAUSE OF
POPULATION GROWTH”
http://www.optimumpopulation.org/releases/opt.release26Mar09.htm
149
The Dominion Post [NZ]. December 22, 2009. “Change to land tax ‘could reduce bill’ for
Maori”
150
Global Ethic Foundation. "Declaration Toward a Global Ethic"
http://www.weltethos.org/dat-english/03-declaration.htm
151
LifeSiteNews. July 7, 2003. "Canada's Heir-Apparent Prime Minister Courts One-Worlder Maurice
Strong for Advisor"
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2003/jul/03070703.html
152
PRISON PLANET. October 25, 2005. "The Ringworm Children: How the Israeli Government
Irradiated 100,000 Israeli Kids"
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2005/281005ringwormchildren.htm
153
About.com. "Christianity Today - General Statistics and Facts of Christianity"
http://christianity.about.com/od/denominations/p/christiantoday.htm
154
TimesOnLine. April 22, 2004. "The mouse with two mothers . . . but no father"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article831717.ece
155
BBC News. February 5, 2008. "Three-parent embryo formed in lab"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7227861.stm
156
National Geographic News. January 25, 2005. "Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy"
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0125_050125_chimeras.html
157
The Washington Post. November 20, 2004. "Of Mice, Men and In-Between"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A63731-2004Nov19
158
National Geographic News. January 25, 2005. Op. cit.
159
Ibid
160
The Washington Post. November 20, 2004. "Of Mice, Men and In-Between"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A63731-2004Nov19
161
Ibid
162
COSMOS [UK magazine] February 19, 2007. "Women to be paid for eggs"
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/1048
163
COSMOS [UK magazine] September 6, 2007. "U.K. approves human-animal hybrids"
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/1564
164
LifeSiteNews. July 28, 2006. "Psych Prof Advocates Human/Chimp Hybrids – But only to Offend
Christians" http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/jul/06072803.html
165
Aldous Huxley. March 20, 1962 Berkeley Language Center - Speech Archive SA 0269
166
The Sunday Times [UK]. October 17, 2004. "Scientists find way to make us slaves"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article495356.ece

54