and Patsies
Islam and the West at War, reads a recent New York Times headline.
It would certainly seem that way if one were to take at face value the putrid assertions of
Western governments that are not particularly known for their honesty or integrity. But astute
observers of history and geopolitics can spot a deception when they see one, and the latest
theatrical performances being marketed to the masses as real, organic occurrences remind
one of a Monty Python sketch.
In the past week we have witnessed a number of expedient events that were
designed to legitimize the Wests imperialist foreign policies in the minds of the
masses. On Feb. 15 the Islamic State (also known as ISIS) released another highly
choreographed and visually striking video depicting the beheading of 21 Egyptian
Coptic Christians. Shortly following the videos release, the Egyptian dictator Abdel
Fattah el-Sissi launched air strikes against ISIS targets in Libya where the
execution video was allegedly filmed, although experts are now saying that the
production was faked.
ISISs continued provocations in the form of carefully crafted, emotionally
impactful execution videos (real or faked), such as the recent immolation of a
caged Jordanian pilot, cannot possibly be the work of rational actors seeking a
military victory in any capacity. The videos only ever work to ISISs disadvantage,
solidifying the resolve of their current coalition opponents as well as creating new
enemies upon every release.
Sixty-two countries and groups are presently fighting in the dubious coalition
against ISIS, most of which have modern militaries with advanced air and ground
forces. Why in the world does ISIS continue to entice more countries to join the
already over-crowded alliance against them? Why a group that purports to want to
establish a state which will ostensibly govern millions of people is deliberately
seeking more and more enemies and a constant state of war with them beggars
belief.
Does ISIS think it can do battle with the whole planet and achieve victory,
culminating in world domination? How do people who harbor such ridiculous
delusions have the wherewithal and resources at their disposal to organize and
recruit thousands of fighters from around the world to an utterly ludicrous cause
doomed to sheer failure? How can this be anything but a contrived prank of an
operation?
The only logical conclusion that many analysts have come to is that ISIS does not
represent a grassroots, organic movement, but rather operates entirely as a cats
paw of Western foreign policy in the Middle East and North Africa, which is
concurrently under the domination of Israel. ISISs actions expressly benefit
Muslims least of all and Israel/the West most of all, the extent of which increases
with every new atrocity and outrage ISIS inflicts upon innocents in Iraq and Syria
that gets endless play in Western media. In fact, the Western medias obsession
with ISIS is in and of itself an effective form of PR for the group. Western media
outlets are consciously performing an unqualified service for ISISs recruiting
efforts by affording the terrorist group premium level branding that will attract
criminally-inclined degenerates, Wahhabist religious zealots and disaffected,
suicidal lowlifes from around the world to join a cause predestined to abject
failure.
This senile ISIS vs. The World spectacle is little more than a melodramatic
screenplay engineered in a boardroom by professional propagandists and
marketing aficionados. It resembles a classic problem, reaction, solution dialectic
of deceit. Who in their right mind believes the rancid mythology surrounding this
orchestrated good vs. evil Hollywood blockbuster?
Proxy Warriors: Cannon Fodder for the Empire
The West is not sincerely at odds with ISIS nor is it seeking to degrade and
destroy the group, as US President Barrack Obama claims. One piece of
information that undermines this good cop/bad cop puppet show is the Wests
clandestine support of ISIS beginning with the artificial uprising in Libya. In 2011,
the West openly sought to depose Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi, and did
so by backing ISIS and al-Qaeda-affiliated rebel groups to do it. The maniac rebels
who sodomized and then murdered Gaddafi in the street like a dog were hailed
as freedom fighters by the repellant thugs in Washington, Paris and London, and
were fully aided and abetted with NATO air strikes against Gaddafis forces. The
rebel victory in Libya was only made possible through Western military
intervention. We came, we saw, he died,said Obamas former Secretary of State
Hilary Clinton in reference to the assassination of Gaddafi by Washingtons foot
soldiers, cackling like a witch at the demise of the Libyan potentate.
In a Nov. 19, 2014, article for Global Research, analyst Tony Cartalucci noted that
the so-called rebels NATO had backed [in Libya] were revealed to be terrorists
led by Al Qaeda factions including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and AlQaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). During the manufactured uprising
Gaddafi routinely declared in public speeches that al-Qaeda was leading the way.
Gaddafi blames uprising on al-Qaeda, read one Al Jazeeraheadline from
February 2011. A March 2011 Guardian report spoke of how hundreds of
terrorists and is even seeking to take out the popular Basij (voluntary) forces from
the battlefield against the Takfiris so that the problem with ISIL remains unsolved
in the near future. General Massoud Jazayeri, the Deputy Chief of Staff of Irans
Armed Forces, called the US-led coalition against ISIS a farce. The US and the socalled anti-ISIL coalition claim that they have launched a campaign against this
terrorist and criminal group while supplying them with weapons, food and
medicine in Jalawla region (a town in Diyala Governorate, Iraq). This explicitly
displays the falsity of the coalitions and the US claims, the general said.
The US military claims these air deliveries are mistakenly ending up in ISISs
possession and that they were intended for Kurdish fighters, but such a ridiculous
assertion rings hollow among the true opponents of ISIS Iran, Syria, Hezbollah
and Shiite volunteers in Iraq. Meanwhile, the laughable nature of Washingtons
anti-ISIS gambit is underscored by the fact that its initial air strikes against ISISs
stronghold in Raqqa, Syria, in September 2014 did little more than destroy a
bunch of empty buildings. CNN let slip that ISIS fighters had evacuated their
command centers in the city 15 to 20 days before US air strikes commenced,
indicating that they were probably tipped off. A Syrian opposition activist told ARA
News that the targeted places [in Raqqa], especially refineries, were set on fire,
pointing out that IS militants evacuated their strongholds in the last two days to
avoid the U.S.-led strikes.
The Hidden Hand of Zionism
The sham rebellion in Syria was devised and executed by outsiders to serve a
nefarious anti-Syrian agenda. All of this seems very confusing if one doesnt take
into consideration the destructive proclivities of the state of Israel in the region.
Israel has essentially used the United States as a cats paw in the Middle East,
manipulating Americas Leviathan military to smash up her enemies. The
formidable Israeli lobby inside the US and its neoconservative lackeys who are a
dominant force in the war-making apparatus of the US Military Industrial Complex
is a key factor driving the Washington foreign policy establishments intransigent
approach to the Middle East. When it comes to Middle East policy, the Israelis
always get their way. America is a thing you can move very easily in the right
direction, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu once bragged. Dont worry about
American pressure on Israel. We control America, the former Israeli PM Ariel
Sharon boasted.
The destruction of Iraq, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Egypt and other Middle
Eastern and North African states is a long-standing Zionist policy plan dating back
to the 1950s. In 1982 a stunning Israeli strategy paper was published which
outlined with remarkable candor a vast conspiracy to weaken, subjugate and
ultimately destroy all of Israels military rivals. Thedocument was called A
Strategy for Israel in the 1980s, authored by Oded Yinon, a prominent thinker in
Israeli Likud circles. In the vein of the Ottoman millet system, Yinon envisioned the
dissolution of Israels neighbors and a new Middle East made up of fractured and
fragmented Arab/Muslim countries divided into multiple polities along ethnic and
religious lines. In Yinons mind, the less unified the Arabs and Muslims are the
better for Israels designs. Better yet, have the Arabs and Muslims fight each other
over land and partition themselves into obscurity. Yinon suggests a way to
accomplish this, primarily by instigating civil strife in the Arab/Muslim countries
which will eventually lead to their dismemberment.
In the document, Yinon specifically recommended:
Lebanons total dissolution into five provinces serves as
a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt,
Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already
following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq
later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such
as in Lebanon, is Israels primary target on the Eastern
front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military
power of those states serves as the primary short term
target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic
and religious structure, into several states such as in
present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shiite Alawi
state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area,
another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern
neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe
even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in
northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the
guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long
run, and that aim is already within our reach today.
He later singled out Iraq as Israels most formidable enemy at the time, and outlined its
downfall in these terms:
want Assad to go. Oren further remarked with glee about the total capitulation of
the Gulf sheikhdoms Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to
Israels itinerary vis--vis Syria, Iran and the Palestinian issue, observing that in
the last 64 years there has probably never been a greater confluence of interest
between us and several Gulf States. With these Gulf States we have agreements
on Syria, on Egypt, on the Palestinian issue. We certainly have agreements on Iran.
This is one of those opportunities presented by the Arab Spring.
Roland Dumas, Frances former foreign minister, confirmed Israeli intrigue behind
Syrias internal woes. In a June 15, 2013, article for Global Research, journalist
Gearid Colmin quotes Dumas who told a French TV channel that the turmoil
in Syria, which has cost the lives of more than 100,000 Syrians, was planned
several years in advance. Dumas claimed that he met with British officials two
years before the violence erupted in Damascus in 2011 and at the meeting they
confessed to him that they were organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria.
When asked for his support in the endeavor, Dumas declined, saying, Im French,
that doesnt interest me. Dumas further pinpointed the architects of the madness
as Israeli Zionists, suggesting that the Syria destabilization operation goes way
back. It was prepared, preconceived and planned [by the Israeli regime]. Dumas
noted that Syrias anti-Israel stance sealed its fate in this respect and also revealed
that a former Israeli prime minister once told him well try to get on with our
neighbours but those who dont agree with us will be destroyed.
Israel planned this war of annihilation years ago in accordance with the Yinon
Plan, which advocates balkanization of all states that pose a threat to Israel,
writes Gearid Colmin in the aforesaid piece. The Zionist entity is using Britain
and France to goad the reluctant Obama administration into sending more
American troops to their death in Syria on behalf of Tel Aviv.
Colmin argues that the West are doing [Israels] bidding by attempting to drag
[the United States] into another ruinous war so that Israel can get control of the
Middle Easts energy reserves, eventually replacing the United States as the ruling
state in the world. It has also been necessary for Tel Aviv to remain silent so as not
to expose their role in the revolutions, given the fact that the Jihadist fanatics
dont realize they are fighting for Israel.
ISIS: A Repository of Patsies for the False Flaggers
At long last, this brings us to the second phase of the ISIS psyop: scaring
Westerners into submission.
Its no coincidence that the notorious belligerence of ISIS in its quest for a
caliphate aligns perfectly with the neocon agenda which aims to inculcate in the
minds of the masses the myth of a clash of civilizations between the West and
Islam. In its official magazine, Dabiq, ISIS ideologues advanced a parallel attitude
with the neocon desire for a civilizational conflict. Is that merely happenstance? Or
has ISIS been manufactured by the neocons to serve as the ultimate boogeyman
and straw man caricature of Islamic radicalism?
The godfather of neoconservatism, Leo Strauss, espoused a dogma of deception,
stipulating that in order to corral society behind the wishes of an elite vanguard
an external enemy must be fashioned. This enemy could be real, but enemies
usually exist in the eye of the beholder and in the minds of those seeking
opposition. Strauss made it clear that if this societal enemy did not exist or was
not formidable enough to generate an adequate amount of fear required to
paralyze and manipulate the masses, then one should be invented or inflated and
then advertised to the populace as a real, pressing danger.
For the neocons, this phantom nemesis forms the crux of their strategy of
subjugation. Without it, the public would never consent to their lunatic foreign
policies, nor would anyone feel threatened enough to willingly relinquish their
freedoms in the name of security. This is what ISIS is all about.
As demonstrated earlier, ISIS was cultivated by our own governments to
destabilize and ultimately overthrow various regimes in the Middle East and North
Africa that fell astray of the Globalist-Zionist program. The Western media has
purposely marketed the ISIS brand across the globe, making it a household
name. The Zionist globalists built up ISIS to do their bidding abroad, but despite
media sensationalism the group is not nearly strong enough to pose any serious
threat to Western countries. So while ISIS represents no legitimate military threat
to the West, its global reputation for brutality and obscene violence is seen as a
fantastic propaganda tool to frighten Western populations into consenting to the
extirpation of their freedoms at home.
The Zionist globalists have put that carefully crafted ISIS image to work, fabricating
a series of perfectly timed terror events inside Western countries which have
been used to curtail freedoms under the guise of keeping us safe from the
terrorists. What the gullible commoners dont realize is that these terrorists are
controlled by our own governments and are being wielded against us to vindicate
this point every single day with a manifold of new freedom-busting laws that they
pass using the comical excuse of protecting us from their own Frankenstein.
Thats the simple truth of the matter that the neocon false flaggers seek to
suppress at all costs as they desperately hold up the faade of their artificial
power which will inevitably collapse under its own weight.
Copyright 2015 Brandon Martinez
Brandon Martinez is an independent writer and journalist from
Canada who specializes in foreign policy issues, international
affairs and 20th and 21st century history. He is the co-founder of
Non-Aligned Media and the author of the 2014 books Grand
Deceptions and Hidden History.
If you found this article useful, considering contributing to NonAligned Media. Also visit our books page.