Case #20

Clarion Printing House vs. NLRC

June 27, 2005
Facts:
Respondent Miclat was employed as probationary employee by petitioner Clarion. Then, the
whole EYCO Group of Companies, of which Clarion was part, was put under receivership
rehabilitation. Miclat was terminated as part of cost-cutting measures by petitioner. Miclat
therefore filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against Clarion. Meanwhile, a temporary
partial shutdown of some of the operations of the Company was implemented. The labor
arbiter found that Miclat was illegally dismissed and directed her reinstatement. By
Resolution, NLRC affirmed. CA sustained the resolutions of the NLRC.
Issue:
Whether or not nominal damages may be awarded?
Ruling:
The Supreme Court deemed it proper to award the amount equivalent to Miclats one month
salary as nominal damages to deter employers from future violations of the statutory due
process rights of employees. Therefore, Php 6,500.00 was awarded as nominal damages for
non-compliance with statutory due process.