Aseev

1 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Having shoveled heaps of Internet information on the tornado and tornado technologies provided by
different authors (and believe me, there were quite a lot of them), I feel sort of making a conclusion. At
first sight, it may seem rather pessimistic. Finished devices with clear operating principles or at least
ones functioning in reality, apparently, do not exist. Just look, is it possible to keep in secret the
design of any device of superior capabilities at our time of fully open information? If something like
that were really invented, the smallest details of the design would spread around the world at a
break-neck speed no matter what efforts might have been made to conceal the fact of the invention.
So a particular device is not likely to have ever existed before or be available now regardless of
optimistic reports of individual authors. However, all the above does not mean that the search should
be terminated. And I do not want to say that in the search of perpetual motion only the search itself is
perpetual ! There is, indeed, an example of successful implementation of a super design, but the
inventor is Nature and its invention is a tornado. Plain as it may seem at first sight, it is at the
same time a most complicated phenomenon. A destructively powerful and extremely vivid outburst of
natural energy with a detestable theory of its origination and a recurrently used phrase like this needs
further research. Still, I suggest trying to reproduce something similar! But before doing it we ought to
have some knowledge (or at least our own wrong beliefs)
of principles that lay inside.
Thus we are facing nothing but a modest task: to engineer a tornado. The first technical
implementation that immediately comes to mind is the Ranque vortex tube. This, in my opinion, is an
excellent attempt to implement principles of a natural phenomenon in a small cylinder. The theory of
this tube is poorly substantiated. For more than 70 years all attempts to reach a single agreement on
causes that make the incoming flow split into the hot and the cool flows have failed. And there is more
to it than that! Another most important strangeness (mentioned very seldom) incomprehensible at
first sight is that the cool and the hot flows in the Ranque tube rotate in the opposite directions!
The internal cool flow is faster and can rotate at nearly several million rotations per minute (!) but in
the direction strictly opposite to the external flow. I would like to catch on this to put forward my own
theory of the Ranque-Hilsch tube and hence the theory of the tornado itself.
The postulate is as easy as a pie. External and internal air layers moving forward in the tube respective
each other (remember, hot air in one direction and cool air in the opposite one) will invariably begin to

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

2 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

whirl about due to mutual friction. As a result, these vortices will twist into a whirling spiral by which
the external and the internal cylinders of the whirling air will be separated. The cross section of the
tube will look like the following:

Two cylinders rotating at a breakneck speed in opposite directions form a boundary layer in between.
On the tube cross section it looks like a real ball-bearing with quickly rotating balls that do not change
their positions. I think it is a logically safe graphical explanation of the odd reverse rotation of the
external and the internal flows inside the tube. Nobody can look into the functioning tube, but all these
balls and rolls are likely to be the essential part of the tube giving rise to many of its odd phenomena.
Meanwhile, something very likely (if not exactly the same) is contained in Schaubergers works:

I believe this is actually the CROSS SECTION OF A TORNADO!

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

3 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Based on this model I am going to build my own model of a tornado. Hello, is there anybody to hear?
So, we are going to have a tornado. But first, a couple of words about wrong models. All of them
are more or less similar.

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

4 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

A vivid example (the left and the central pictures) of such a model is the one built by Louis Michaud
(Canada). This model totally ignores the real structure of a tornado (and therefore no worthy result
was obtained using it despite huge efforts, money and time!). I, however, enjoyed the second picture (in
the center) though, probably, not in the sense implied by the author. In my opinion, the right-hand
picture shows a more successful implementation: In a well-developed tornado there is ALWAYS a
considerable flow directed from the CENTER DOWNWARD with the structure and properties
similar to an ordinary water funnel in a bath tub sink. This funnel is just the mobilizing and
shaping structure to attract matter (and energy!) from all sides surrounding the funnel. In
natural conditions the surrounding air would tend to move with all its mass from the periphery
to the central vertical vacuum column to form a grand picture of a developed tornado! To the
right is just what Schauberger used to call a VORTEX TROUTE (vortex throat).
Such is indeed the thing I tried to reproduce in a more correct (from my point of view) picture on the
right (in contrast to the two previous ones)
. As a rule, nobody sees the funnel in the tornado
displayed here since it is hidden by rather opaque masses of a boundary layer. This funnel may be seen

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

5 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

only in photographs and video movies of the most transparent tornadoes (shown many times on
many pages of the website)
. Nobody has ever had a wish to look inside a tornado too. And we will
hardly hear from those who did look inside True, there are very small and rare bits of evidence left
by observers who chanced to survive. Such things happened when the tornados trunk mercifully
jumped over the heads of unwanted observers. What did they happen to see then inside the trunk?
Firstly, an incredibly blue sky very high above. Secondly, a black-gray solid rotating cylinder with
lightning flashes at the sides. I would venture a remark: a tornado is not just whirling air columns.
It is, in fact, two huge air cylinders inserted into one another and rotating with different
velocities (2-fold difference) in one direction. Moreover, the outside tornado cylinder is
represented by spiral rolls (please forgive me for this incorrect comparison) of the boundary layer
bundles. Such ball-bearing rolls are rotating at a relatively low speed, while in the internal area
there are rotating air masses similar to a funnel outgoing from a bathtub. And while watching a tornado
we actually see an interim layer brought about by the rotating air cylinders inserted into each
other! (let me repeat, with the two-fold difference in the rotation velocities). There are lots
of such pictures on Internet sites, just look, for instance, at the ones below:

Now it is high time to propose a design of a tornado generator based on the above principle. The unit
is ABC simple. We may arbitrarily call it a tornado brewing pot.

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

6 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

The simplicity of the design is really striking. It can be made of two small washbowls (acting as
dielectrics), the upper bowl having a hole with a flared metal part inserted into it. Thus we have a
high-velocity electrical motor with a centrifugal turbine sort of a car turbocharger type. For example,
one of such turbines 10-20 cm in the diameter is capable of rotation at 180 K rpm!!!

However, I do not think we will ever need such a velocity. I suggest being limited by Schaubergers
parameters, i.e. a 15-20 cm turbine rotating at 15-20 K rpm, with the external diameter of the whole
structure being 50-100 cm. The rpm velocity is high but quite realistic.
Let us start rotating it very slowly. At a low rotation speed an internal self-eversible torus is developed
whose movement I tried to explain repeatedly on pages of this website. The figure (or the body, to be
more exact) is remarkable in itself and, in my opinion, prone to self-acceleration.

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

7 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

As the rotation velocity increases, the flow gives up looping and the Coandas effect displays itself in
all its beauty. May I remind you that it means a jet flow of liquid or gas getting attached to a nearby
surface. This is why air begins to attach itself to the throat as it moves outside. But Nature hates
emptiness, and soon outside air starts to be sucked in through the center to make up for the air that
escaped from the pot. Two counterflows are developed one incoming in the center and the other
outgoing at the periphery. And the two flows are not mutually friendly; they rub against one another
producing multiple whirls. It comes about like this:

As the velocity increases still more, the whirls acquire a specific shape and are transformed into the
air rolls that I depicted at the beginning of this page. In the long run everything is converted into
something similar to what I depicted, and I think this is a jump-like (!) process, as shown below:

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

8 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

The incoming (sucked in) air in the center, rotating spiral rolls of the air flow (red), the outgoing air at
the periphery (blue). Now please refer to the animated picture of the cross-section A-A below:

A real tornado may have a similar cross section. Moreover, it is at the same time an electrostatic
generator with the rotation center as the minus and the periphery as the plus. Reaching the
breakdown voltage results in lightning strikes that have an additional turning effect on the rolls (see
the operating principles of a PFT motor described in detail at Naudins site). Probably, these are the
lightnings described by casual observers who chanced to look into the tornados trunk from below.
Incidentally, the same is mentioned by pilots of aircraft who happened to fly over the tornados eye
from above. The fact that a tornado is an electrical machine is confirmed by the picture below:

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

9 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

I believe the mutual electrical attachment of the peripheral plus and the central minus is the
main reason for the tornado trunks stability. And it is quite likely V. Atsyukovskys model of
the tornado structure which, in principle (!), contradicts to all generally accepted models is true.
The essence of the model is very simple:
There is a powerful downward flow in the center of a well-developed tornado
(exactly like the funnel in a bathtub).
The end of the flow impacts the earth followed by an implosive emission of
energy.
The flow slews upward (with a mandatory surf at the tornados foot).
The twisted air masses move upwards in a rope-like flow
Watching a tornado we see only a thin-walled cylinder of the boundary layer!
In motion this boundary layer gets as strong as armor.
The external atmospheric pressure compresses the dynamic cylinder and
narrows the rotation radius of air masses making them rotate faster.
There is heat and electricity exchange between the huge vertically extended
dynamic cylinder and the environment.
Given below is a structure of a typical tornado in interpretation of L. Fominsky:

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

10 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

In seems to me that we can finally come to a stationary power generating system with direct energy
pick-up between the grounded motor and the flared metal throat (the unit actually consuming only
air and water!)

The above can be understood as a huge vertical air shaft for rotation of a giant vortex! Or: A
looped air toroid (tornado), actually a huge open Ranque tube.
The conversion of thermal energy of the environment into mechanical and, finally, electrical
energy is quite a worthy weapon in fighting the global warming!
ANATOMY OF A TORNADO

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

11 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

From storm to major event: how havoc happens

1. Warm, moist air at the surface rises rapidly, creating an updraft.
2. Falling rain evaporates, cooling the air around it.
3. The wall cloud rotates as it's hit with winds from opposite directions.
4. As the rotation intensifies, a visible funnel drops out of the clouds.
5. A prominent overshooting top forms when the updraft is very strong.
6. Powerful updrafts give hail time to form.
7. A dust shroud is kicked up by the tornado's strong winds at ground level.
8. Central downdrafts appear in some tornadoes.
9. Tornadoes generator.
I am expecting a question: why are there only 5 balls in my ball bearing?
The answer exposes in full glory the theory of Valery Shikhirin whose findings are accessible from the
same site with adjacent buttons. He associates them with the number of rolls in a tornado. Indeed,
make use of the following link to see pictures of a most powerful typhoon Isabel taken from space
in the period of its maximum activity (incidentally, typhoons Ivan, Katerina and others have the
same structure).

http://www.enterprisemission.com/hurricane3.htm (Only the link is published here not

to infringe the copyright)
At that site the so called Tornados Devil Star is described. Moreover, no less intriguing information
has appeared in the Internet of late! A number of experiments with the Newtons bucket (Arent all
these names remarkable!) were conducted in Professor Bohrs laboratory in Denmark. Let me remind
you that the Newtons bucket in such experiments is a usual cylindrical vessel (30 cm in diameter and
of the same height) filled with water the bottom of which is rotated by a motor (i.e. there is a flat
round organic glass disk attached to the bottom). So, the lab experiments show that during rotation the

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

12 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

bottom of the vessel is capable of self-organization and acquires the appearance of absolutely
well-defined geometrical figures from a triangle to a hexagon, according to Danish researchers. And
one of the most stable figures turned out to be a pentagon! This is the central photograph of the tests
(top view), which is actually the process I would like to repeat either with water or with air.

In the center we see the organic glass bottom of the vessel rotating at about 300 rpm. The cycling
water follows the trajectory of a rotating self-eversible torus I am constantly speaking about wherever
I can. The star in the center of the vortex is absolutely still at a certain bottom rotation velocity.
From the videoroll of that site one can clearly see the flows circulating in the following way:

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

13 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Still more intriguing are drawings made by witnesses of a tornado that occurred in the city of Ivanovo
in 1984. One of them is a print of the tornado effect manifested by a felled forest when a twister
suddenly descended from a thunderstorm cloud to the earths surface and made a little stop before
moving further crashing everything on its way.

Just because of this my animated picture above (see the A-A cross-section, the flow from the tornado pot) has 5
ball-bearing rolls. Moreover, taking into account the results of the Danish experiment, the final design of the
optimized tornado pot is transformed into something I tried to depict below (the pots cross-section + the
removed upper part). Try to look at the flows as at a three-dimensional image! Arent we going to have a
sufficiently logical and well-balanced picture? The area of the central input orifice is equal to the area of the 5
output nozzles.

Frankly speaking, I have spent too much of the sites space trying to express my ideas. However, the design
principles I am promoting are not as simple as they might seem at first glance. If I begin just to describe what, in my
opinion, goes on inside this structure, then the site will expand multifold and the essence will be lost in the ocean of
words. Therefore, I am just going to mention effects and fields of physics that I believe are present here.
mechanics, centrifugal forces (elements of the curvilinear movement theory, gyroscopes);
electricity and magnetism (electrostatics, balloelectricity, centrifugal charge separation, the
magnetic field of rotating charged particles, the ESD theory, MHD generators, Lorenz forces);
aero-hydrodynamics including Bernoullis, Coandas, Magnuss law effects;
thermal capacity, heat exchange (just think of unusual water properties!);
exotic phenomena like the PFT motor operation, transformation of the boundary layer into an
ascending spiral, acceleration of axial vortex motion by the Browning motion ordering (!);
Ranque-Hilsch.
A detailed investigation into the above issues and phenomena is a task for hundreds of research laboratories for
decades to come. Therefore I suggest the easiest way out modeling.
Here so far the focus has been made on the description of an alternative energy source. It is easy to understand
that simply by turning such unit upside down we may obtain an alternative flying vehicle. Such as the below
lampshade with one big central nozzle and 5 small peripheral nozzles.

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

14 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Many readers might think I am repeating myself.

Indeed, some of my colleagues made individual attempts to manufacture, at my suggestion, similar devices. Look at
the picture of one of such units.

After the startup of the electrical motor (running at 10 K rpm and having a small turbine on the 70 mm shaft) a
seemingly paradoxical thing occurred: the device got sucked (and very firmly at that!) to the floor.
Does it mean the attempt to make a gas toroid has failed? Alas, what I suggested was not correctly understood (I
dont want anybody to take offence!). By centrifugal forces the air was simply swept away from under the

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

15 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

potential flying saucer and the device was pressed to the floor by atmospheric pressure. Though, perhaps, a pretty
good device for walking on the ceiling might have been obtained.
However, our final goal is different: to obtain a universal alternative flying vehicle by harnessing the tornado
and making it tame. Therefore, we are going to update the design fundamentally taking into account the
negative experience.

The name a flying lampshade will, probably, fit best of all. A similar one hangs before my eyes in my bedroom.

But to be more precise, this is actually an open-type Ranque tube. Its resemblance to Schaubergers Repulsin
is also obvious. My opponents will immediately have a question: where does the lift come from if the central
incoming flow is equal to the peripheral outgoing flow and hence the resultant impulse will be zero?
Not entirely so To be more exact, it is entirely different. Non-compensated centripetal forces appear as the
air flows around the lower part of the dome. These are the very forces that press a pilot into an aircrafts seat
when he loops the loop. In this very manner an aircraft decelerates by reversal of the engine or with the drag
parachute during landing. Based on this very principle a Pelton bucket turbine works in hydropower
engineering. To add all the effects I tried to describe earlier for the power system, what a splendid apparatus
could be fabricated for the needs of the Emergency Ministry!
A few words about the design details:
Dimensions:
Many people believe that dimensions of a soliton (an aerial toroid) are discrete and have specific relations between
the outer diameter and the inner diameter (the eye diameter). On my own behalf, I would add that the number of
bundles-vortices that make such a toroid is also discrete. In the example based on the Danish experiments I suggest
a 5-roll design with the outer diameter of about 60cm (according to Alexander Makhov, one of the discrete torus
sizes close to this figure is almost exactly 70 cm), the eye diameter in this case is about 10 cm.
Materials:
I suggest using epoxy to make a light-weight and durable package. The flares of the incoming and outgoing flows
should conduct current in which case we may hopefully obtain a high-voltage potential!
Working medium:

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

16 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

It may be water, air. In this situation the working medium volume is greater than the dimensions of the device
itself. The device, one could say, is open-type with intensive energy exchange with the environment.
Turbine:
It is one of the most interesting issues. In my proposals I completely ignore Viktor Schaubergers wave turbine,
pipe turbine, horny turbine. I simply regard all the above as absolutely useless technologically superfluous
things.
However, I do not want to ignore the working medium trajectories that Viktor Schauberger (together with
Professor Poppel, his follower from Stuttgart) tried to obtain. I mean the sophisticated curve below:

What I do disregard are sophisticated methods of obtaining such trajectories
Probably, the most successful version is the turbine of a usual car turbocharger capable of producing something
alike.

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

17 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Or even the one like this, homemade (!!!)

And even such a star turbine (literally, the top of manufacturability and operation reliability!). Moreover,
providing a capability to enable the Magnus effect:

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

18 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

What I mean is: the design of the turbine is not the main thing! It is the working medium trajectory that really
matters! The principal task is to generate the below air toroid based on one of our available designs (the picture is
provided by the courtesy of Gaby Muller and taken from her site.

The Motor
I believe a very powerful motor is not needed; rather it should have a high rotation velocity (just like it was in
Schaubergers design). When the air toroid rotation is looped the flows become odd such that they have higher
angular and rotation velocities and enable self-acceleration of the design when flowing to the center. I draw you
attention to the table below that lists motors used mainly in aircraft modeling. However, even an electrical saw
motor might come in handy.

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

19 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

And this photodocument is sort of a joke (from a series of well-known photos by Billy Meyer). The joke, though,
is very true to life (below is not just a picture push to see the VIDEO)...

By the way, has anybody made any of Schaubergers ideas work? Hm, . Look at a similar option like this:

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

20 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Do you say its simple? It depends. Does anyone want to try? I suppose it might work and be quite interesting at
that
AN ALTERNATIVE FLYING VEHICLE

And I would call this design (top of simplicity and engineering skill!) the
PANDORRAS BOX.

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

21 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Please pay attention to the perfectly matched rotations of the working medium flows:
The outer size of 30-60 cm in diameter seems to be just the thing A car compressor turbine plus a 20-30K rpm
motor (perhaps a high-velocity motor from a construction tool).
And finally, a VIDEOFILE OF A FLIGHT (push the picture below). Fundamentally, this video is a skilful
provocation and forgery, but look how strikingly identical is the thinking mechanism of the majority of people!

It is not unlikely they are also familiar with this website:

The pseudo-UFO joke is worth laughing at, however the device itself proved to be quite real and operable!
It should be only noted that the designers of this model have paid too much attention to appearances and completely
misunderstood the main idea of the design!
And this idea (in my opinion) has not been disclosed. Just like in all Huttons models.

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

22 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Further I would like to present my own vision of the design and explain its principles:

A Tornado Generator
I am not going to repeat myself and assure you that making a
tornado is an easy matter. Nevertheless I suggest trying to
fabricate it by a method that actually ignores all known
methods used by other researchers and focuses on the
following items:
1. An air whirl/twister/tornado can be observed in nature in
a wide range of sizes from several dozens centimeters to
several kilometers. Lets try to engineer the smallest one
and then we will see!
2. The device shell is a rigid composer of the most loaded
and critical part of a tornado - its base (the foot).
3. The device turbine is a normal centrifugal type and has
3 functions:
The process startup (ramping up to the operating mode)
Pick up of excessive energy
Brake (if needed)
4. The vertical water-aerial column with the central TOP-DOWN VACUUM FUNNEL (theoretically
unlimited in size) is the surface of a huge heat exchanger sucking thermal energy from the
environment and simultaneously an acceleration trajectory of the vortex working medium.
5. The umbilical tubes for air and water below are additional process controllers.
6. Ramping up to the operation mode is sure to go in a jump-like manner! Perhaps, this indeed
happened in one of the experiments carried out by Viktor Schaubergers followers (when one
of the models was swept away from the pedestal and hangar roof was pierced through). In this
case an additional and more powerful BRAKE is likely needed!
Somebody will ask: you really say all the above is difficult for implementation? OK, let put it in a
simpler way:
PANDORRA'S BOX-2

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

23 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

Specifically, there are 6 funnels here (the main one is virtual going from the center downward, and the remaining
five funnels are funnel-like shapers of the boundary layer of the tornado placed at the periphery and directed
upward). The resultant dynamic structure is just a civilized tornado, the tamed vortex that can be controlled
in order to structure and pick up energy scattered in space. I would not say that everything is in strict conformity
with Viktor Schaubergers ideas. Perhaps, even contrary to them From his heritage I am taking what I think to be
the main idea: any twisted funnel is completed with an implosive burst!
Probably, the main idea of all known Viktor Schaubergers patents is contained in the schematic drawing below:

I venture to express orally a primitive thought:

Nobody would ever give the name of the perpetual motion machine to a wind mill that makes use of
usual horizontal wind for hundreds of years.
I suggest a similar idea to use the energy of a tornado, i.e. the energy of twisted vertical wind
(push the picture below!):

14.10.2014 23:32

Aseev

24 von 24

http://evgars.com/arsentyev.htm

What is left to do is a mere trifle we have to put one of the devices suggested here into the basis of

such vortex, eliminate the chaotic behavior and unpredictability and begin to control the thing
earlier referred to as a mere accident!
I wish everyone would watch all movies placed at youtube.com by tornado, vortex, dust devil queries. Look
attentively at the videofiles and you will understand that everything works based on the principles I tried to explain
here.
A small comment. All the videofiles of artificial tornadoes look quite impressive. But for me they are not too
convincing! I am impressed only by videos of natural tornadoes and whirlwinds. Because in all of them there is
always:
A CENTRAL DOWNGOING VACUUM BUNDLE AROUND WHICH EVERYTHING IS FORMED (THE
SO CALLED VORTEX THROAT)
Those who will be the first to understand it will receive a KEY TO CONTROL A STABLE TORNADO.

Best regurds Evgeniy Aseev

2014
Freely quoted with reference to the website of the author
, -

14.10.2014 23:32