BEST OF LUCK
Keep Playing with the Codes in Future also.
Page 2 of 3
Answer Sheet
Problem # 1: 2D Computational Heat Advection (CHA):
a) Plot and discuss the steady state temperature contours for the different advection schemes (3 figures).
b) Plot and discuss the temperature profile at the vertical centerline(x=0.5), T(y), for the different advection
schemes (3 figures).
(a1)
(b1)
(a2)
(b2)
(a3)
(b3)
Fig. 3.1: Steady state temperature contours using the (a1) FOU scheme (a2) SOU scheme (a3) QUICK
scheme. Temperature variation along the vertical centerline using the (b1) FOU scheme (b2)
The plotsSOU
shown
are Temperature
y for x=0.5.
scheme
(b3) QUICKvsscheme
Fou scheme is the most deviating from the analytical solution, whereas quick and sou are closer
approximations to the analytical solution. Quick and sou schemes nevertheless do not show a
continous increasing trend like fou scheme. According to the analytical solution there is a abrupt
change in temperature at the diagonal of the plate.
Page 3 of 3
(a1)
(b1)
(a2)
(b2)
Fig. 3.2: Steady state temperature contours using the (a1) FOU scheme and (a2) QUICK scheme.
Temperature variation at different axial locations using the (b1) FOU scheme and (b2) QUICK
scheme.
Assuming Tinlet=100C and Twall=0. Ycoordinate vs temperature.
Legend used in graphs b1&b2: x/L=0.2(+), 0.4(o), 0.6(*), 0.8(.), 1(x)
The fou scheme gives higher values of steady state temperature for a given point compared to the quick
scheme. The steady state temperature contour shows that the temperature keeps getting closer to the wall
temperature along the length.